Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
“MANY‐CITEDNESS”: CITATIONS MEASURE MORE THAN JUST SCIENTIFIC QUALITY. (2021). D'Ippoliti, Carlo.
In: Journal of Economic Surveys.
RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:35:y:2021:i:5:p:1271-1301.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 86

References cited by this document

Cocites: 23

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abbasi, A., Wigand, R.T. and Hossain, L. (2014) Measuring social capital through network analysis and its influence on individual performance. Library & Information Science Research 36: 66–73.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  2. Abramo, G., Cicero, T. and DAngelo, C.A. (2015) Should the research performance of scientists be distinguished by gender? Journal of Informetrics 9: 25–38.

  3. Baccini, A. and De Nicolao, G. (2016) Do they agree? Bibliometric evaluation versus informed peer review in the Italian research assessment exercise. Scientometrics 108(3): 1651–1671.

  4. Baccini, A., Barabesi, L., Khelfaoui, M. and Gingras, Y. (2020) Intellectual and social similarity among scholarly journals: an exploratory comparison of the networks of editors, authors and co‐citations. Quantitative Science Studies 1(1): 277–289.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Baccini, A., De Nicolao, G. and Petrovich, E. (2019) Citation gaming induced by bibliometric evaluation: a country‐level comparative analysis. PLoS One 14(9): e0221212. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221212.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Baldi, S. (1998) Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: a network‐ analytic model. American Sociological Review 63(6): 829–846.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  7. Bertocchi, G., Gambardella, A., Jappelli, T., Nappi, C.A. and Peracchi, F. (2015) Bibliometric evaluation vs. informed peer review: evidence from Italy. Research Policy 44(2): 451–466.

  8. Blanchard, O. (2016) Do DSGE models have a future?. Peterson Institute of International Economics PB 16‐11.

  9. Bornmann, L. and Wohlrabe, K. (2019) Normalisation of citation impact in economics. Scientometrics 120: 841–884.

  10. Bornmann, L., Daniel, H.D. (2008) What do citation counts measure? What do citation A review of studies on citing behavior, Journal of Documentation 64(1): pp. 45‐80.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  11. Bouchaud, J.‐P. (2008) Economics needs a scientific revolution. Nature 455(30): 1181.

  12. Brembs, B., Button, K. and Munafò, M. (2013) Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7: art. 291.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Cainelli, G., Maggioni, M.A., Uberti, T.E. and de Felice, A. (2012) Co‐authorship and productivity among Italian economists. Applied Economics Letters 19(6): 1609–1613.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  14. Camacho‐Miñano, M. and Núñez‐Nickel, M. (2009) The multilayered nature of reference selection. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60(4): 754–777.

  15. Cameron, A.C., Gelbach, J.G. and Miller, D.L. (2008) Bootstrap‐based improvements for inference with clustered errors. Review of Economics and Statistics 90: 414–427.

  16. Cameron, A.C., Gelbach, J.G. and Miller, D.L. (2011) Robust inference with multi‐way clustering. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 29(2): 238–249.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  17. Case, D.O. and Miller, J.B. (2011) Do bibliometricians cite differently from other scholars? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62(3): 421–432.

  18. Chang, C.L., Maasoumi, E. and McAleer, M. (2016) Robust ranking of journal quality: an application to economics. Econometric Reviews 35(1): 50–97.

  19. Chavance, B. and Labrousse, A. (2018) Institutions and ‘Science’: the contest about pluralism in economics in France. Review of Political Economy 30(2): 190–209.

  20. Colussi, T. (2018) Social Ties in Academia: a Friend is a Treasure. The Review of Economics and Statistics 100(1): 45–50.

  21. Corsi, M., DIppoliti, C. and Lucidi, F. (2011) On the evaluation of economic research: the case of Italy. Economia Politica 3: 369–402.

  22. Corsi, M., DIppoliti, C. and Zacchia, G. (2019) Diversity of backgrounds and ideas: the case of research evaluation in economics. Research Policy 48(9). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103820.

  23. Davis, P.M. (2009) Reward or persuasion? The battle to define the meaning of a citation. Learned Publishing 21: 5–11.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. DIppoliti, C. (2020) Democratizing the Economics Debate. Pluralism and Research Evaluation. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  25. DIppoliti, C. and Zacchia, G. (2017) On the efficiency of Italian universities: a comment. Italian Economic Journal 3(1): 113–123.

  26. Ductor, L., Fafchamps, M., Goyal, S. and van der Leij, M.J. (2014) Social networks and research output. The Review of Economics and Statistics 96(5): 936–948.

  27. Ductor, L., Goyal, S., van der Leij, M. and Paez, G.N. (2020) On the influence of top journals. Cambridge‐INET Working Paper n. 2020/15.

  28. Edwards, M.A. and Roy, S. (2017) Academic research in the 21st century: maintaining Scientific Integrity in a climate of perverse incentives and hypercompetition. Environmental Engineering Science 34(1): 51–61.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  29. Ellison, G. (2013) How does the market use citation data? The Hirsch index in economics. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 5(3): 63–90.

  30. Erikson, M.G. and Erlandson, P. (2014) A taxonomy of motives to cite. Social Studies of Science 44: 625–637.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  31. Fafchamps, M., Goyal, S. and van der Leij, M.J. (2010) Matching and network effects. Journal of the European Economic Association 8(1): 203–231.

  32. Fourcade, M., Ollion, E. and Algan, Y. (2015) The superiority of economists. Journal of Economic Perspectives 29(1): 89–114.

  33. Georg, C.‐P. and Rose, M.E. (2016a) Mirror, mirror on the wall, who is the most central of them all? ERSA Working Paper 571, Economic Research Southern Africa, Cape Town.

  34. Georg, C.‐P. and Rose, M.E. (2016b) The importance of informal intellectual collaboration with central colleagues. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2877586.

  35. Goyal, S. (2016) Networks in economics. A perspective on the literature. In Y. Bramoullé, A. Galeotti and B. Rogers (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  36. Goyal, S., van der Leij, M.J. and Moraga‐González, J.‐L. (2006) Economics: an emerging small world. Journal of Political Economy 114(2): 403–412.

  37. Graham, B.S. (2017) An econometric model of network formation with degree heterogeneityy. Econometrica, 85(4), 1033–1063. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA12679.

  38. Hamermesh, D.S. (2018) Citations in economics: measurement, uses, and impacts. Journal of Economic Literature 56(1): 115–156.

  39. Hands, D.W. (2001) Reflection without Rules. Economic Methodology and Contemporary Science Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  40. Heckman, J.J. and Moktan, S. (2018) Publishing and promotion in economics: the tyranny of the top five. NBER Working Papers n. 25093.

  41. Helgadóttir, O. (2016) The Bocconi boys go to Brussels: italian economic ideas, professional networks and European austerity. Journal of European Public Policy 23(3): 392–409.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Hicks, D. and Melkers, J. (2012) Bibliometrics as a tool for research evaluation. In A. Link and Vornatas N. (eds.), Handbook on the Theory and Practice of Program Evaluation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Hicks, D. and Potter, J. (1991) Sociology of scientific knowledge: a reflexive citation analysis or science disciplines and disciplining science. Social Studies of Science 21: 459–501.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  44. Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., Rafols, I. (2015) The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics, Nature, 520, pp. 429–431.

  45. Jackson, M.O., Rogers, B.W. and Zenou, Y. (2017) The economic consequences of social‐network structure. Journal of Economic Literature 55(1): 49–95.

  46. Johnson, B., Oppenheim, C. (2007), How socially connected are citers to those that they cite?, Journal of Documentation, 63, pp. 609–637.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  47. Kim, E.H., Morse, A. and Zingales, L. (2009) Are elite universities losing their competitive edge? Journal of Financial Economics 93: 353–381.

  48. King, D.A. (2004) The scientific impact of nations. Nature 430: 311–316.

  49. King, M.M., Bergstrom, C.T., Correll, S.J., Jacquet, J. and West, J.D. (2016) Men set their own cites high: gender and self‐citation across fields and over time. arXiv, n. 1607.00376, available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.00376.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  50. Krampen, G., Becker, R., Wahner, U. and Montada, L. (2007) On the validity of citation counting in science evaluation: content analyses of references and citations in psychological publications. Scientometrics 71(2): 191–202.

  51. Krugman, P. (2009) How did economists get it so wrong?. The New York Times Magazine, September 2nd.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Letchford, A., Moat, H.S. and Preis, T. (2015) The advantage of short paper titles. Royal Society Open Science 2: art. 150266.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  53. Li, E.Y., Liao, C.H. and Yen, H.R. (2013) Co‐authorship networks and research impact: a social capital perspective. Research Policy 42: 1515–1530.

  54. Macdonald, S. and Kam, J. (2010) Counting footnotes: citability in management studies. Scandinavian Journal of Management 26: 189–203.

  55. MacRoberts, M.H. and MacRoberts, B.R. (1996) Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics 36(3): 435–444.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Mählck, P. and Persson, O. (2000) Socio‐bibliometric mapping of intra‐departmental networks. Scientometrics 49: 81–91.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Mancini, P. (2013) The Italian public sphere: a case of dramatized polarization. Journal of Modern Italian Studies 18(3): 335–347.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Martin, B.R. and Irvine, J. (1983) Assessing Basic Research. Research Policy 12: 61–90.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  59. May, A.M., McGarvey, M.G. and Kucera, D. (2018) Gender and European economic policy: a survey of the views of European economists on contemporary economic policy. Kyklos 71: 162–183.

  60. Moed, E.F. (2005) Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation, Dordrecht: Springer.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  61. Molina, J.A., Alcolea, A., Ferrer, A., Iñiguez, D., Rivero, A., Ruiz, G. and Tarancón, A. (2016) Co‐authorship and academic productivity in economics: interaction maps from the complex networks approach. IZA Discussion Paper, n. 10008, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit, Bonn.

  62. Morresi, O. (2017) How much is CEO education worth to a firm? Evidence from European firms. PSL Quarterly Review 70(282): 311–353.

  63. Necker, S. (2014) Scientific misbehavior in economics. Research Policy 43(10): 1747–1759.

  64. Oswald, A.J. (2007) An examination of the reliability of prestigious scholarly journals: evidence and implications for decision‐makers. Economica 74(293): 21–31.

  65. Perc, M. (2014) The Matthew effect in empirical data. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 11.20140378 http://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0378.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  66. Perry, M. and Reny, P.J. (2016) How to count citations if you must. American Economic Review 106(9): 2722–2741.

  67. Radicchi, F., Fortunato, S. and Castellano, C. (2008) Universality of citation distributions: towards an objective measure of scientific impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 105(45): 17268–17272.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  68. Rafols, I., Leydesdorff, L., OHare, A. and Nightingale, P. and Stirling, A. (2012) How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: a comparison between innovation studies and business & management. Research Policy 41: 1262–1282.

  69. Rodrik, D. (2016) Economics Rules. New York: W.W. Norton.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Romer, P. (2016) The Trouble with Macroeconomics. Mimeo, Stern School of Business, New York University (forthcoming in The American Economist).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  71. Roncaglia, A. (2018) The economists job. PSL Quarterly Review 71(284): 3–8.

  72. Rubinstein, A. (2017) Comments on economic models, economics, and economists: remarks on Economics Rules by Dani Rodrik. Journal of Economic Literature 55(1): 162–172.

  73. Santos Silva, J.M.C. and Tenreyro, S. (2006) The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics 88(4): 641–658.

  74. Science Europe (2020) Position Statement and Recommendations on Research Assessment Processes, July 2020, available at https://www.scienceeurope.org/media/3twjxim0/se-position-statement-research-assessment-processes.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. Seabrooke, L., Ban, C., Helgadóttir, O., Nilsson, E.R. and Young, K. (2015) Embedding group think. Assessing the Spread of Neoliberal Ideas and Influence. Presented at the INET Annual Conference, Paris, April 8‐11. Available at https://www.ineteconomics.org/uploads/papers/Seabrooke-et-al.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  76. Sud, P. and Thelwall, M. (2014) Evaluating altmetrics. Scientometrics 98: 1131–1143.

  77. Todeschini R. and Baccini A. (eds.) (2016) Handbook of Bibliometric Indicators: Quantitative Tools for Studying and Evaluating Research, New York: Wiley.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  78. Tol, R.S.J. (2013) The Matthew effect for cohorts of economists. Journal of Informetrics 7: 522–527.

  79. Uddin, S., Hossain, L. and Rasmussen, K. (2013) Network effects on scientific collaborations. PLoS One 8(2): art. e57546.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. Wallace, M.L., Larivière, V. and Gingras, Y. (2012) A small world of citations? The influence of collaboration networks on citation practices. PLoS One 7(3): art. e33339.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. Wang, D., Song, C. and Barabási, A.‐L. (2013) Quantifying long‐term scientific impact. Science 342: 127–132.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  82. White, H.D., Wellman, B. and Nazer, N. (2004) Does citation reflect social structure? Longitudinal evidence from the ‘Globenet’ interdisciplinary research group. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 55(2): 111–126.

  83. White, M.D. and Wang, P. (1997) A qualitative study of citing behavior: contributions, criteria, and metalevel documentation concerns. The Library Quarterly 67(2): 122–154.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  84. Wilhite, A.W. and Fong, E.A. (2012) Coercive citation in academic publishing. Science 335: 542–543.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  85. Yan, E. and Ding, Y. (2009) Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: a coauthorship network analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60(10): 2107–2118.

  86. Zacchia, G. (2017) Diversity in economics: a gender analysis of Italian academic production. INET Working Paper, n. 2017m, available at https://www.ineteconomics.org/uploads/papers/WP_61-Zacchia-Diversity-Final.pdf.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Study on the predictability of new topics of scholars: A machine learning-based approach using knowledge networks. (2025). Mao, Jin ; Xiao, Lianjie ; Wu, Zhixiang ; Wang, Hao ; Jiang, Hucheng.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:19:y:2025:i:1:s175115772500001x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Hierarchical Bayesian model to estimate and compare research productivity of Italian academic statisticians. (2024). Negri, Ilia ; Mezzetti, Maura.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:129:y:2024:i:12:d:10.1007_s11192-024-05154-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Is the scientific impact of the LIS themes gender-biased? A bibliometric analysis of the evolution, scientific impact, and relative contribution by gender from 2007 to 2022. (2024). Cobo, Manuel J ; Choji, Thamyres T ; Moral-Munoz, Jose A.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:129:y:2024:i:10:d:10.1007_s11192-024-05005-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Does writing style affect gender differences in the research performance of articles?: An empirical study of BERT-based textual sentiment analysis. (2023). Deng, Zhongzhun ; Ma, Yongchao ; Zhang, YI ; Teng, Ying ; Liu, LI.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:128:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s11192-023-04666-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Social determinants of citations: An empirical analysis of UK economists. (2023). Zacchia, Giulia ; Mongeau Ospina, Christian Alexander ; Gobbi, Lucio ; D'Ippoliti, Carlo.
    In: Kyklos.
    RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:76:y:2023:i:4:p:827-858.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. First-author gender differentials in business journal publishing: top journals versus the rest. (2022). Patil, Vivek H ; Joanis, Steven T.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:127:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-021-04235-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Predicting the future impact of Computer Science researchers: Is there a gender bias?. (2022). Kuppler, Matthias.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:127:y:2022:i:11:d:10.1007_s11192-022-04337-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Investigating the mentorship effect on the academic success of young scientists: An empirical study of the 985 project universities of China. (2022). Zeng, Mingbin ; Shang, Jing ; Zhang, Gupeng.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:16:y:2022:i:2:s1751157722000372.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. What should be rewarded? Gender and evaluation criteria for tenure and promotion. (2021). Sanz-Menendez, Luis ; Cruz-Castro, Laura.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:15:y:2021:i:3:s1751157721000675.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Gender differences in research performance within and between countries: Italy vs Norway. (2021). Abramo, Giovanni ; Aksnes, Dag W ; Dangelo, Ciriaco Andrea.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:15:y:2021:i:2:s1751157721000158.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. “MANY‐CITEDNESS”: CITATIONS MEASURE MORE THAN JUST SCIENTIFIC QUALITY. (2021). D'Ippoliti, Carlo.
    In: Journal of Economic Surveys.
    RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:35:y:2021:i:5:p:1271-1301.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Gender bias in patenting process. (2020). Yang, Zhongkai ; Wang, Yukai ; Liu, Lanjian.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:14:y:2020:i:3:s1751157719303724.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Diversity of backgrounds and ideas: The case of research evaluation in economics. (2019). Zacchia, Giulia ; D'Ippoliti, Carlo ; Corsi, Marcella ; Dippoliti, Carlo.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:48:y:2019:i:9:8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Are scientific memes inherited differently from gendered authorship?. (2018). Fontainha, Elsa ; Araújo, Tanya ; Araujo, Tanya.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:117:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2903-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Is predatory publishing a real threat? Evidence from a large database study. (2018). Imasato, Takeyoshi ; Perlin, Marcelo S ; Borenstein, Denis.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:116:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-018-2750-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Do females create higher impact research? Scopus citations and Mendeley readers for articles from five countries. (2018). Thelwall, Mike.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:12:y:2018:i:4:p:1031-1041.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. The Brazilian scientific output published in journals: A study based on a large CV database. (2017). Santos, Andre ; Perlin, Marcelo ; Da Silva, Sergio ; Borenstein, Denis ; Imasato, Takeyoshi.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:79662.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. The specific shapes of gender imbalance in scientific authorships: A network approach. (2017). Fontainha, Elsa ; Araújo, Tanya ; Araujo, Tanya.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:88-102.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The Brazilian scientific output published in journals: A study based on a large CV database. (2017). Santos, Andre ; Da Silva, Sergio ; Imasato, Takeyoshi ; Perlin, Marcelo S ; Borenstein, Denis.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:18-31.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. The north–south divide in the Italian higher education system. (2016). Abramo, Giovanni ; Rosati, Francesco ; Dangelo, Ciriaco Andrea.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:109:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-016-2141-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. The specific shapes of gender imbalance in scientific authorships: a network approach. (2016). Fontainha, Elsa ; Araújo, Tanya ; Araujo, Tanya.
    In: Working Papers Department of Economics.
    RePEc:ise:isegwp:wp172016.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Drivers of academic performance in a Brazilian university under a government-restructuring program. (2016). Rangel, Thiago Fernando ; Clorinda, Maria ; Bini, Luis Mauricio ; Alexandre, Jose.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:10:y:2016:i:1:p:151-161.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Gender differences in scientific performance: A bibliometric matching analysis of Danish health sciences Graduates. (2015). Frandsen, Tove Faber ; Jacobsen, Rasmus Hojbjerg ; Brixen, Kim ; Wallin, Johan A ; Ousager, Jakob.
    In: Journal of Informetrics.
    RePEc:eee:infome:v:9:y:2015:i:4:p:1007-1017.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-07-17 04:37:36 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated July, 2 2024. Contact: Jose Manuel Barrueco.