- Arzoumanidis, I., Salomone, R., Petti, L., Mondello, G., & Raggi, A. (2017). Is there a simplified LCA tool suitable for the agri‐food industry? An assessment of selected tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 149, 406–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.059.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Beckmann, M., Hielscher, S., & Pies, I. (2014). Commitment strategies for sustainability: How business firms can transform trade‐offs into win–win outcomes. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(1), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1758.
- Benini, L., Mancini, L., Sala, S., Manfredi, S., Schau, E. M., & Pant, R. (2014). Normalisation method and data for environmental footprints. Luxembourg: European Union. EUR 26842.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bicalho, T., Sauer, I., Rambaud, A., & Altukhova, Y. (2017). LCA data quality: A management science perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 156, 888–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.229.
Comas Martí, J. M., & Seifert, R. W. (2013). Assessing the comprehensiveness of supply chain environmental strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22, 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1749.
- Ekvall, T., & Weidema, B. P. (2004). System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 9, 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02994190.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- European Commission, 2010a. Joint Research Centre—Institute for Environment and Sustainability: International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook. Analysis of existing Environmental Impact Assessment methodologies for use in Life Cycle Assessment.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- European Commission, 2010b. Joint Research Centre—Institute for Environment and Sustainability: International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook. Framework and Requirements for Life Cycle Impact Assessment Models and Indicators.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- European Commission, 2010c. Joint Research Centre—Institute for Environment and Sustainability: International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook. General guide for Life Cycle Assessment—Detailed guidance., Luxembourg.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- European Commission, 2010d. Joint Research Centre—Institute for Environment and Sustainability: International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook. Specific guide for Life Cycle Inventory data sets.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- European Commission, 2011. Joint Research Centre—Institute for Environment and Sustainability: International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook. Recommendations for Life Cycle Impact Assessment in the European context.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- European Commission, 2013. Commission Reconmmendation of 9 April 2013 on the use of common methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations. Global Reporting Initiative, Sustainability reporting, n.d., Retrieved from https://www.globalreporting.org/information/sustainability‐reporting/.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Goedkoop, M., Heijungs, R., Huijbregts, M., Schryver, A.D., Struijs, J., van Zelm, R., 2009. ReCiPe 2008—A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level. Ministry of VROM, The Hague.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Guillén‐Gosálbez, G., & Grossmann, I. (2010). A global optimization strategy for the environmentally conscious design of chemical supply chains under uncertainty in the damage assessment model. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 34, 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2009.09.003.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Guillén‐Gosálbez, G., & Grossmann, I. E. (2009). Optimal design and planning of sustainable chemical supply chains under uncertainty. AICHE Journal, 55, 99–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.11662.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Hugo, A., & Pistikopoulos, E. N. (2005). Environmentally conscious long‐range planning and design of supply chain networks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 1471–1491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.04.011.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- International Standard Organization, 2006a. ISO 14040: Environmental management, life cycle assessment, principles and framework.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- International Standard Organization, 2006b. ISO 14044: Environmental management, life cycle assessment, requirements and guidelines. ISO.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Laurent, A., Bakas, I., Clavreul, J., Bernstad, A., Niero, M., Gentil, E., … Christensen, T. H. (2014). Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems—Part I: Lessons learned and perspectives. Waste Management, 34, 573–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.045.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mavrotas, G. (2009). Effective implementation of the ε‐constraint method in multi‐objective mathematical programming problems. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 213, 455–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2009.03.037.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Meckenstock, J., Barbosa‐Póvoa, A. P., & Carvalho, A. (2016). The wicked character of sustainable supply chain management: Evidence from sustainability reports. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25, 449–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1872.
- Mota, B., Gomes, M.I., Carvalho, A., Barbosa‐Povoa, A.P., 2017a. LCA in sustainable supply chain design and planning: The impact of goal and scope definition. (under submission).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Mota, B., Gomes, M.I., Carvalho, A., Barbosa‐Povoa, A.P., 2017b. Sustainable supply chains: An integrated modelling approach under uncertainty. Omega (in press).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Oelze, N., Hoejmose, S. U., Habisch, A., & Millington, A. (2016). Sustainable development in supply chain management: The role of organizational learning for policy implementation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25, 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1869.
- Ripa, M., Fiorentino, G., Vacca, V., & Ulgiati, S. (2017). The relevance of site‐specific data in life cycle assessment (LCA). The case of the municipal solid waste management in the metropolitan city of Naples (Italy). Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, Part 1, 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.149.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Speck, R., Selke, S., Auras, R., & Fitzsimmons, J. (2016). Life cycle assessment software: Selection can impact results. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12245.
- Wernet, G., Bauer, C., Steubing, B., Reinhard, J., Moreno‐Ruiz, E., & Weidema, B. (2016). The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): Overview and methodology. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 21, 1218–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367‐016‐1087‐8.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Yang, Y., Heijungs, R., & Brandão, M. (2017). Hybrid life cycle assessment (LCA) does not necessarily yield more accurate results than process‐based LCA. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 237–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.006.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now