Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

create a website
Forest Certification and ISO 14001: Current State and Motivation in Forest Companies. (2016). Puumalainen, Kaisu ; Toppinen, Anne ; Tuppura, Anni.
In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:25:y:2016:i:5:p:355-368.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 16

Citations received by this document

Cites: 68

References cited by this document

Cocites: 31

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Corporate social responsibility: Current state and future opportunities in the forest sector. (2024). Wallace, Lisa ; Villamor, Grace B.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:31:y:2024:i:4:p:3194-3209.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Market-Oriented Mechanisms of Environmental Responsibility and Global Environmental Regulation. (2024). Voropaev, A I ; Shvarts, E A ; Baibar, A S ; Ptichnikov, A V.
    In: Regional Research of Russia.
    RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:14:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1134_s2079970524600549.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Forest certification and its impact on business management and market performance: The key role of motivations. (2024). Siguenza, Waleska ; Zubizarreta, Mikel ; Cuadrado, Jesus ; Arana-Landin, German.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:166:y:2024:i:c:s1389934124001205.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Research approaches to sustainable forest-based value creation: A literature review. (2024). Pykalainen, Jouni ; Hujala, Teppo ; Rusanen, Katri.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:163:y:2024:i:c:s1389934124000753.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Forest bioeconomy at regional scale: A systematic literature review and future policy perspectives. (2023). Cappelletti, Giulio Mario ; Pazienza, Pasquale ; de Lucia, Caterina ; di Letizia, Gerardo.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:155:y:2023:i:c:s1389934123001478.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. How environmental regulations affect corporate innovation? The coupling mechanism of mandatory rules and voluntary management. (2021). Lan, Xiao ; Wang, Zongjun ; Jiang, Zhenyu.
    In: Technology in Society.
    RePEc:eee:teinso:v:65:y:2021:i:c:s0160791x21000506.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Forest Stewardship Council and Responsible Wood certification in the integrated pest management in Australian forest plantations. (2021). Lawson, Simon A ; Wilcken, Carlos F ; Zanuncio, Jose C ; Lemes, Pedro G.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:131:y:2021:i:c:s1389934121001477.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Motives, Barriers, and Expected Benefits of ISO 14001 in the Agri-Food Sector. (2020). Fort, Fatiha ; Carrillo-Labella, Rocio ; Parras-Rosa, Manuel.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:1724-:d:325059.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Time for carbon neutrality and other emission reduction measures at European airports. (2020). Falk, Martin ; Hagsten, Eva.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:29:y:2020:i:3:p:1448-1464.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Eco-certification protocols as mechanisms to foster sustainable environmental practices in telecoupled systems. (2019). Batistella, Mateus ; Bicudo, Ramon Felipe ; James, ; Dou, Yue ; Palmieri, Roberto.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:105:y:2019:i:c:p:52-63.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Frame Analysis of ENGO Conceptualization of Sustainable Forest Management: Environmental Justice and Neoliberalism at the Core of Sustainability. (2018). Stern, Tobias ; Hesser, Franziska ; Imunovi, Nenad.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:9:p:3165-:d:167756.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Disclosure of corporate social responsibility in the forestry sector of the Congo Basin. (2018). Colao, Rui ; Simo, Joo .
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:92:y:2018:i:c:p:136-147.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Assessment of Chain-of-Custody Certification in the Czech and Slovak Republic. (2017). Parobek, Jan ; Paluš, Hubert ; Upin, Mikula ; Dudik, Roman.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:10:p:1898-:d:115888.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Setting Strategies outside a Typical Environmental Perspective Using ISO 14001 Certification. (2017). Chiarini, Andrea.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:26:y:2017:i:6:p:844-854.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Aguilar F, Cai Z. 2010. Conjoint effect of environmental labeling, disclosure of forest of origin and price on consumer preferences for wood products in the US and UK. Ecological Economics 20: 308–318. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.002.

  2. Aguilera RV, Rupp DE, Williams CS, Ganapathi J. 2007. Putting the s back in corporate social responsibility: a multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review 32(3): 836–863. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2007.25275678.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Aguinis H, Glavas A. 2012. What we know and don't know about corporate social responsibility: a review and research agenda. Journal of Management 38(4): 932–968. DOI: 10.1177/0149206311436079.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Amato LH, Amato CH. 2012. Environmental policy, rankings and stock values. Business Strategy and the Environment 21: 317–325. DOI: 10.1002/bse.742.

  5. Armstrong JS, Overton TS. 1977. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research XIV: 396–402.

  6. Auld G, Berstein S, Cashore B. 2008. The new corporate social responsibility. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 33: 413–435. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.environ.32.053006.141106.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Bansal P, Roth K. 2000. Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal 43(4): 717–736. DOI: 10.2307/1556363.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Barla P. 2007. ISO 14001 certification and environmental performance in Quebec's pulp and paper industry. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 53(3): 291–306. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2006.10.004.

  9. Boiral O, Henri J. 2012. Modelling the impact of ISO14001 on environmental performance: a comparative approach. Journal of Environmental Management 99: 84–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.01.007.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Braunsberger K, Buckler B. 2011. What motivates consumers to participate in boycotts: lessons from the ongoing Canadian seafood boycott. Journal of Business Research 64: 96–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.12.008.

  11. Brønn PS, Vidaver‐Cohen D. 2009. Corporate motives for social initiative: legitimacy, sustainability, or the bottom line? Journal of Business Ethics 87: 91–109. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-008-9795-z.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Cashore B, Auld G, Newsom D. 2004. Governing Through Markets: Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non‐state Authority. Yale University Press: New Haven, CT.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Chen J, Innes JL, Kozak RA. 2011. An exploratory assessment of the attitudes of Chinese wood products manufacturers towards forest certification. Journal of Environmental Management 92: 2984–2992. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.07.012.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Chiu S‐C, Sharfman M. 2011. Legitimacy, visibility, and the antecedents of corporate social performance: an investigation of the instrumental perspective. Journal of Management 37(6): 1558–1585. DOI: 10.1177/0149206309347958.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Darnall N, Henriques I, Sadorsky P. 2010. Adopting proactive environmental strategy: the influence of stakeholders and firm size. Journal of Management Studies 47(6): 1072–1094. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00873.x.

  16. Davis K. 1973. The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal 16(2): 312–322. DOI: 10.2307/255331.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Delmas M, Toffel M. 2004. Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework. Business Strategy and the Environment 13: 209–222. DOI: 10.1002/bse.409.

  18. Delmas M. 2001. Stakeholders and competitive advantage: the case of ISO 14001. Production and Operations Management 10: 345–358. DOI: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2001.tb00379.x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Doonan J, Lanoie P, Laplante B. 2005. Determinants of environmental performance in the Canadian pulp and paper industry: an assessment from inside the industry. Ecological Economics 55: 73–84. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.017.

  20. Driscoll C. 2006. The not so clear‐cut nature of organizational legitimating mechanisms in the Canadian forest sector. Business and Society 45(3): 322–353. DOI: 10.1177/0007650306289398.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Eccles RG, Ioannou I, Serafeim G. 2013. The Impact of Corporate Sustainability of Organizational Processes and Performance, Harvard Business School Working Paper 12‐035.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Ervin D, Wu J, Khanna M, Jones C, Wirkkala T. 2013. Motivations and barriers to corporate environmental management. Business Strategy and the Environment 22: 390–409. DOI: 10.1002/bse.1752.

  23. Freeman RE. 1984. Strategic Management: a Stakeholder Approach. Pitman: Boston, MA.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Godfrey PC, Merrill GB, Hansen JM. 2009. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal 30: 425–445. DOI: 10.1002/smj.750.

  25. Guldbrandsen L. 2008. Accountability arrangements in non‐state standards organizations: instrumental design and imitation. Organization 15(4): 563–583. DOI: 10.1177/1350508408091007.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Hansen E, Juslin H. 2011. Strategic Marketing in Global Forest Industries, 2nd edn. Authors’ Academic Press: Corvallis, OR, USA.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Heikkurinen P, Bonnedahl K. 2013. Corporate responsibility for sustainable development: a review and conceptual comparison of market‐ and stakeholder‐oriented strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production 43: 191–198. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.021.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Henriques I, Sadorsky P. 1999. The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Academy of Management Journal 42(1): 87–99. DOI: 10.2307/256876.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Johansson J. 2014. Why do forest companies change their CSR strategies? Responses to market demands and public regulation through dual‐certification. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 57(3): 349–368. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2012.743882.

  30. Kollert W, Lagan P. 2007. Do certified tropical logs fetch a market premium? A comparative price analysis from Sabah, Malaysia. Forest Policy and Economics 9: 862–868. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2006.03.005.

  31. Lee K‐H, Shin D. 2010. Consumers’ responses to CSR activities: the linkage between increased awareness and purchase intention. Public Relations 36: 193–195. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.10.014.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Li N, Toppinen A. 2011. Corporate responsibility and sustainable competitive advantage in the forest‐based industry: complementary or conflicting goals? Forest Policy and Economics 13(1): 113–123. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2010.06.002.

  33. Lozano R. 2013. A holistic perspective on corporate sustainability drivers. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. DOI: 10.1002/csr.1325.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Martínez‐Ferrero J, Frías‐Aceituno JV. 2013. Relationship between sustainable development and financial performance: international empirical research. Business Strategy and the Environment. DOI: 10.1002/bse.1803.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Mikkilä M, Toppinen A. 2008. Corporate responsibility reporting in the world's leading pulp and paper companies. Forest Policy and Economics 10: 500–506. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2008.05.002.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Misani N. 2010. The convergence of corporate social responsibility practices. Management Research Review 33(7): 734–748. DOI: 10.1108/01409171011055816.

  37. Mohr LA, Webb DJ, Harris KE. 2001. Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. The Journal of Consumer Affairs 35(1): 45–72. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6606.2001.tb00102.x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Näsi J, Näsi S, Phillips N, Zyglidopoulos S. 1997. The evolution of corporate social responsiveness: an exploratory study of Finnish and Canadian forestry companies. Business and Society 36(3): 296–321. DOI: 10.1177/000765039703600305.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Nehrt C. 1996. Timing and intensity effects of environmental investments. Strategic Management Journal 17: 535–547. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199607)17:7<535::AID-SMJ825>3.0.CO;2-9.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Nicholls A. 2010. Fair trade: towards an economics of virtue. Journal of Business Ethics 92: 241–255. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-010-0581-3.

  41. Orlitzky M, Schmidt FL, Rynes SL. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: a meta‐analysis. Organization Studies 24(3): 403–441. DOI: 10.1177/0170840603024003910.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Panwar R, Hansen E. 2009. A process for identifying social and environmental issues: a case of the US forest products manufacturing industry. Journal of Public Affairs 9: 323–336. DOI: 10.1002/pa.336.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Papagiannakis G, Voudouris I, Lioukas S. 2014. The road to sustainability: exploring the process of corporate environmental strategy over time. Business Strategy and the Environment 23: 254–271.

  44. Perrini F, Russo A, Tencati A, Vurro C. 2011. Deconstructing the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics 102: 59–76. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-011-1194-1.

  45. Potoski M, Prakash A. 2005. Green clubs and voluntary governance: ISO 14001 and firms’ regulatory compliance. American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 235–248. DOI: 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00120.x.

  46. Purbawiyatna A, Simula M. 2008. Developing Forest Certification. Towards Increasing Comparability and Acceptance of Forest Certification Systems Worldwide, ITTO Technical Series 29.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Ranängen H, Zobel T. 2014. Revisiting the ‘how’ of corporate social responsibility in extractive industries and forestry. Journal of Cleaner Production. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Sæther B. 2000. Continuity and convergence: reduction of water pollution in the Norwegian paper industry. Business Strategy and the Environment 9: 390–400. DOI: 10.1002/1099-0836(200011/12)9:6<390::AID-BSE261>3.0.CO;2-Y.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Sebhatu S, Enqvist B. 2007. ISO14001 as a driving force for sustainable development and value creation. TQM Magazine 19: 468–482. DOI: 10.1108/09544780710817883.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Sharma S, Henriques I. 2005. Stakeholder influence on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal 26: 159–180. DOI: 10.1002/smj.439.

  51. Sharma S, Vredenburg H. 1998. Proactive corporate environmental strategies and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 19: 729–753. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199808)19:8<729::AID-SMJ967>3.0.CO;2-4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Sinclair P, Walton J. 2003. Environmental reporting within the forest and paper industry. Business Strategy and the Environment 12: 326–337. DOI: 10.1002/bse.376.

  53. Stevens JM, Steensma HK, Harrison DA, Cochran PL. 2005. Symbolic or substantive document? The influence of ethics codes on financial executives’ decisions. Strategic Management Journal 26: 181–195. DOI: 10.1002/smj.440.

  54. Suchman M. 1995. Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review 20(3): 571–610. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.1995.9508080331.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Thompson DW, Anderson RC, Hansen EN, Kahle LR. 2010. Green segmentation and environmental certification: insights from forest products. Business and the Environment 19: 319–334. DOI: 10.1002/bse.647.

  56. Tikina A., Innes J. 2008. A framework for assessing effectiveness of forest certification. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 38: 1357–1365. DOI: 10.1139/X08-011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Toppinen A, Cubbage F, Moore S. 2014. Economics of forest certification and corporate social responsibility. In Handbook of Forest Resource Economics, Kant S, Alavapati J (eds). Routledge: London; pp. 444–458. ISBN-13: 978-0415623247.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Toppinen A, Li N, Tuppura A, Xhang Y. 2012. Corporate responsibility and strategic groups in the forest‐based industry: exploratory analysis based on the GRI frame. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 19: 191–205. DOI: 10.1002/csr.256.

  59. United Nations. 2012. The Future We Want, outcome document of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development. http://www.uncsd2012.org/content/documents/727The%20Future%20We%20Want%2019%20June%201230pm.pdf [11 January 2014].
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. van de Ven B, Graafland JJ. 2006. Strategic and moral motivation for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Citizenship 22: 111–123.

  61. Vidal NG, Bull GQ, Kozak RA. 2010. Diffusion of corporate responsibility practices to companies: the experience of the forest sector. Journal of Business Ethics 94(4): 553–567. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-009-0281-z.

  62. Vidal NG, Kozak RA. 2008a. Corporate responsibility practices in the forestry sector. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship 31: 59–75. DOI: 10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2008.au.00009.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Vidal NG, Kozak RA. 2008b. The recent evolution of corporate responsibility practices in the forestry sector. International Forestry Review 10: 1–13. DOI: 10.1505/ifor.10.1.1.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  64. Vogel D. 2005. The Market for Virtue: the Potential and Limits of CSR. Brooking Institution Press: Washington, DC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Vogel D. 2008. Private global business regulation. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 261–282. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.141706.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Vogel D. 2010. The private regulation of global corporate conduct: achievements and limitations. Business and Society 49(1): 68–87. DOI: 10.1177/0007650309343407.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Williams S, Schaefer A. 2013. Small and medium‐sized enterprises and sustainability: managers’ values and engagement with environmental and climate change issues. Business Strategy and the Environment 22: 173–186. DOI: 10.1002/bse.1740.

  68. Zhang Y, Toppinen A, Uusivuori J. 2014. Internationalization of the forest industry: a synthesis of the literature and implications for the future research. Forest Policy and Economics 38(1): 8–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.06.017.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Smallholder farmer resilience to water scarcity. (2022). Roshetko, James M ; Cai, Zhen ; Hendrawan, Dienda ; Aguilar, Francisco X ; Stallmann, Judith.
    In: Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development.
    RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01545-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Reviewing the impacts of eco-labelling of forest products on different dimensions of sustainability in Europe. (2022). Lafortezza, Raffaele ; So, Hau Wing.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:145:y:2022:i:c:s1389934122001642.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Enhancing wood products through ENplus, FSC and PEFC certifications: Which attributes do consumers value the most?. (2022). Brun, Filippo ; Bruzzese, Stefano ; Poratelli, Francesca ; Pippinato, Liam ; Blanc, Simone ; Zanchini, Raffaele.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:142:y:2022:i:c:s1389934122000958.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Analysing the consumer purchasing behaviour for certified wood products in Italy. (2022). Furno, Marilena ; Caracciolo, Francesco ; Panico, Teresa .
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:136:y:2022:i:c:s1389934121002768.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Modelling welfare estimates in discrete choice experiments for seaweed-based renewable energy. (2021). Mariel, Petr ; Demel, Simona ; Longo, Alberto.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0260352.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Italian Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Eucalyptus Firewood. (2020). Pari, Luigi ; Suardi, Alessandro ; Palmieri, Nadia.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:7:p:2629-:d:337378.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Indicators of Consumers’ Preferences for Bio-Based Apparel: A German Case Study with a Functional Rain Jacket Made of Bioplastic. (2020). Menrad, Klaus ; Emberger-Klein, Agnes.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:2:p:675-:d:309711.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. The Eucalyptus Firewood: Understanding Consumers’ Behaviour and Motivations. (2020). Latterini, Francesco ; Suardi, Alessandro ; Palmieri, Nadia ; Pari, Luigi.
    In: Agriculture.
    RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:11:p:512-:d:437624.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Firewood certification programs: Key attributes and policy implications. (2020). Vásquez Lavín, Felipe ; Barrientos, Manuel ; Herrera, Ivan ; Castillo, Alvaro ; Ponce, Roberto D.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:137:y:2020:i:c:s0301421519307463.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. The impact of sustainability in coffee production on consumers’ willingness to pay–new evidence from the field of ethical consumption. (2019). Beham, Florian ; Fuchs, Florian ; Lingnau, Volker.
    In: Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung.
    RePEc:spr:jmgtco:v:30:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s00187-019-00276-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Evaluation of Corporate Social Responsibility by Consumers: Use of Organic Material and Long Working Hours of Employees. (2019). Nakano, Makiko.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:19:p:5219-:d:270047.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Understanding Sustainable Forest Management Certification in Slovakia: Forest Owners’ Perception of Expectations, Benefits and Problems. (2018). Šulek, Rastislav ; Parobek, Jan ; Paluš, Hubert ; Šálka, Jaroslav ; Alka, Jaroslav ; Lich, Jan.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:7:p:2470-:d:157995.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Design of tropical forest conservation contracts considering risk of deforestation. (2018). Aguilar, Francisco X ; Mohebalian, Phillip M.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:70:y:2018:i:c:p:451-462.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Intention to Purchase Sustainable Wood Products: An Empirical Analysis of the Determinants. (2018). Caracciolo, Francesco ; Pagnani, Tiziana ; Panico, Teresa.
    In: International Journal on Food System Dynamics.
    RePEc:ags:ijofsd:277727.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Willingness to Pay for Government-Certified Agri-Products in South Korea. (2017). Lin, Yu-Hsuan ; Kim, Kyungja.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:84100.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Eco-label credibility and retailer effects on green product purchasing intentions. (2017). Cai, Zhen ; Aguilar, Francisco X ; Xie, YI.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:80:y:2017:i:c:p:200-208.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Green Public Procurement of Certified Wood: Spatial Leverage Effect and Welfare Implications. (2017). Brusselaers, Jan ; Buysse, Jeroen ; van Huylenbroeck, Guido.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:135:y:2017:i:c:p:91-102.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. How does consumer knowledge affect environmentally sustainable choices? Evidence from a cross-country latent class analysis of food labels. (2016). Steiner, Bodo ; Grebitus, Carola ; Peschel, Anne ; Veeman, Michele.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:69864.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Towards a common standard – A reporting checklist for web-based stated preference valuation surveys and a critique for mode surveys. (2016). TSAGARAKIS, KONSTANTINOS ; Olsen, Søren ; Menegaki, Angeliki .
    In: Journal of choice modelling.
    RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:18:y:2016:i:c:p:18-50.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Forest Certification and ISO 14001: Current State and Motivation in Forest Companies. (2016). Puumalainen, Kaisu ; Toppinen, Anne ; Tuppura, Anni.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:25:y:2016:i:5:p:355-368.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Environmental Policy in the Nordic Wood Product Industry: Insights Into Firms’ Strategies and Communication. (2016). Räty, Tarmo ; Roos, Anders ; Nyrud, Anders Q ; Toppinen, Anne ; Riala, Maria ; Raty, Tarmo.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:25:y:2016:i:1:p:10-27.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Learning how to choose—effects of instructional choice sets in discrete choice experiments. (2015). Meyerhoff, Jürgen ; Glenk, Klaus.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:41:y:2015:i:c:p:122-142.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Exploring the drivers side of the “blend wall”: U.S. consumer preferences for ethanol blend fuels. (2015). Aguilar, Francisco X. ; Thompson, Wyatt ; Mohebalian, Phillip ; Cai, Zhen .
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:49:y:2015:i:c:p:217-226.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. The Role of the Beneficiary in Willingness to Pay for Socially Responsible Products: A Meta-analysis. (2014). Tully, Stephanie M ; Winer, Russell S.
    In: Journal of Retailing.
    RePEc:eee:jouret:v:90:y:2014:i:2:p:255-274.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Is there a price premium for certified wood? Empirical evidence from log auction data in Japan. (2014). Yamamoto, Yuki ; Takeuchi, Kenji ; Shinkuma, Takayoshi.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:38:y:2014:i:c:p:168-172.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Can household consumers save the wild fish? Lessons from a sustainable seafood advisory. (2013). Villas-Boas, Sofia ; Hallstein, Eric .
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:66:y:2013:i:1:p:52-71.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Consumer stated purchasing preferences and corporate social responsibility in the wood products industry: A conjoint analysis in the U.S. and China. (2013). Aguilar, Francisco X. ; Cai, Zhen .
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:95:y:2013:i:c:p:118-127.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Assessing the total economic value of threatened livestock breeds in Italy: Implications for conservation policy. (2013). Signorello, Giovanni ; De Salvo, Maria ; Drucker, Adam G. ; Zander, Kerstin K. ; Gandini, Gustavo .
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:93:y:2013:i:c:p:219-229.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Price Fairness in the Case of Green Products: Enterprises Policies and Consumers Perceptions. (2013). Achabou, Mohamed Akli ; Dekhili, Sihem.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:22:y:2013:i:8:p:547-560.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Are There Price Premiums for Certified Wood?Empirical Evidence from Log Auction Data in Japan. (2012). Yamamoto, Yuki ; Takeuchi, Kenji ; Shinkuma, Takayoshi.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:koe:wpaper:1209.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-02-12 20:20:07 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.