- (2021), the last term in equation (B.8) is bounded by C2αl(s/3) (1, 1, s) ⤠C2αǫ M C3 s d , C3 s d , s . (B.11) Putting these together, equation (B.8) is bounded by C κM (s/3) + sd b αǫ M (s/3)
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- â 0 (B.15) and QM (θ) is uniformly equicontinuous. The proof of equation (B.15) and the equicontinuity is standard. One can follow, for instance, the proof of Theorem 3 in Jenish and Prucha (2012). Next, I prove the asymptotic normality. The key steps are to prove ⦠â1/2 M p |DM | X iâDM q(Xi, θâ M ) d â N(0, Ik) (B.16) and sup θâÎ |DM | X iâDM âθq(Xi, θ) â ED
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Abadie, A. (2005), Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators. The review of economic studies 72(1), 1â19.
Abadie, A. and Imbens, G. (2002), Simple and bias-corrected matching estimators for average treatment effects. Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research.
Abadie, A., Imbens, G.W., and Zheng, F. (2014), Inference for misspecified models with fixed regressors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 109(508), 1601â1614.
Agarwal, A., Cen, S., Shah, D., and Yu, C.L. (2022), Network synthetic interventions: A framework for panel data with network interference. Tech. rep., arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.11355.
Arkhangelsky, D., Imbens, G.W., Lei, L., and Luo, X. (2021), Double-robust two-wayfixed -effects regression for panel data. Tech. rep., arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.13737.
- Aronow, P.M. and Samii, C. (2017), Estimating average causal effects under general in44 terference, with application to a social network experiment. Annals of Applied Statistics 11(4), 1912â1947.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Athey, S. and Imbens, G.W. (2022), Design-based analysis in difference-in-differences settings with staggered adoption. Journal of Econometrics 226(1), 62â79.
- Auerbach, E. and Tabord-Meehan, M. (2021), The local approach to causal inference under network interference. Tech. rep., arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.03810.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Balzer, L.B., Petersen, M.L., and van der Laan, M.J. (2015), Targeted estimation and inference for the sample average treatment effect. Tech. rep., U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Basse, G.W. and Airoldi, E.M. (2018), Limitations of design-based causal inference and a/b testing under arbitrary and network interference. Sociological Methodology 48(1), 136â151.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Butts, K. (2021), Difference-in-differences estimation with spatial spillovers. Tech. rep., arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.03737.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Clarke, D. (2017), Estimating difference-in-differences in the presence of spillovers. Tech. rep., MPRA Paper No. 81604.
Delgado, M.S. and Florax, R.J. (2015), Difference-in-differences techniques for spatial data: Local autocorrelation and spatial interaction. Economics Letters 137, 123â126.
Di Tella, R. and Schargrodsky, E. (2004), Do police reduce crime? estimates using the allocation of police forces after a terrorist attack. American Economic Review 94(1), 115â133.
- Emmenegger, C., Spohn, M.L., and BuÌhlmann, P. (2022), Treatment effect estimation from observational network data using augmented inverse probability weighting and machine learning. Tech. rep., arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.14591.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Forastiere, L., Airoldi, E.M., and Mealli, F. (2021), Identification and estimation of treatment and interference effects in observational studies on networks. Journal of the American Statistical Association 116(534), 901â918.
- Gallant, A.R. and White, H. (1988), A unified theory of estimation and inference for nonlinear dynamic models. Blackwell.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Ghanem, D., SantâAnna, P.H., and WuÌthrich, K. (2022), Selection and parallel trends.
Hudgens, M.G. and Halloran, M.E. (2008), Toward causal inference with interference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 103(482), 832â842.
Imai, K. and Ratkovic, M. (2014), Covariate balancing propensity score. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B: Statistical Methodology pp. 243â263.
Imbens, G.W. (2004), Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: A review. Review of Economics and statistics 86(1), 4â29.
Jardim, E., Long, M.C., Plotnick, R., Van Inwegen, E., Vigdor, J., and Wething, H. (2022), Minimum-wage increases and low-wage employment: Evidence from seattle. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 14(2), 263â314.
Jenish, N. and Prucha, I.R. (2009), Central limit theorems and uniform laws of large numbers for arrays of random fields. Journal of econometrics 150(1), 86â98.
Jenish, N. and Prucha, I.R. (2012), On spatial processes and asymptotic inference under near-epoch dependence. Journal of Econometrics 170(1), 178â190.
- Jin, Y. and RothenhaÌusler, D. (2023), Tailored inference for finite populations: conditional validity and transfer across distributions. Biometrika p. asad022.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kojevnikov, D., Marmer, V., and Song, K. (2021), Limit theorems for network dependent random variables. Journal of Econometrics 222(2), 882â908.
Leung, M.P. (2022), Causal inference under approximate neighborhood interference. Econometrica 90(1), 267â293.
Ma, X. and Wang, J. (2020), Robust inference using inverse probability weighting. Journal of the American Statistical Association 115(532), 1851â1860.
Man, Y., SantâAnna, P.H., Sasaki, Y., and Ura, T. (2023), Doubly robust estimators with weak overlap. Tech. rep., arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08974.
Manski, C.F. (1993), Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. The review of economic studies 60(3), 531â542.
Manski, C.F. (2013), Identification of treatment response with social interactions. The Econometrics Journal 16(1), S1âS23.
Newey, W.K. (1991), Uniform convergence in probability and stochastic equicontinuity.
- Newey, W.K. and McFadden, D. (1994), Large sample estimation and hypothesis testing.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- q(Xi, θ) p â 0 (B.13) follows from Lemma 4.1 and Theorem 3.1 in Kojevnikov et al. (2021). Next, sup θâÎ |DM | X iâDM q(Xi, θ) â ED
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- q(Xi, θ) p â 0 (B.14) follows from Corollary 3.1 in Newey (1991) and equation (B.13) under condition (v). Also, ED q(Xi, θ) is uniformly equicontinuous. Let QÌ(θ) = |DM | X iâDM q(Xi, θ)â² b Ψ |DM | X iâDM q(Xi, θ). Finally, we need to show sup θâÎ |QÌ(θ) â QM (θ)| p
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Qu, Z., Xiong, R., Liu, J., and Imbens, G. (2022), Efficient treatment effect estimation in observational studies under heterogeneous partial interference. Tech. rep., arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.12420.
Rambachan, A. and Roth, J. (2022), Design-based uncertainty for quasi-experiments. Tech.
- Rambachan, A. and Roth, J. (2023), A more credible approach to parallel trends. Review of Economic Studies p. rdad018.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- rep., arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.00602.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Roth, J. (2022), Pretest with caution: Event-study estimates after testing for parallel trends. American Economic Review: Insights 4(3), 305â22.
Roth, J. and SantâAnna, P.H. (2023), When is parallel trends sensitive to functional form? Econometrica 91(2), 737â747.
- SaÌvje, F. (2023), Causal inference with misspecified exposure mappings: separating definitions and assumptions. Biometrika .
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- SaÌvje, F., Aronow, P., and Hudgens, M. (2021), Average treatment effects in the presence of unknown interference. Annals of statistics 49(2), 673.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
SantâAnna, P.H. and Zhao, J. (2020), Doubly robust difference-in-differences estimators. Journal of Econometrics 219(1), 101â122.
Xu, R. and Wooldridge, J.M. (2022), A design-based approach to spatial correlation. Tech.