Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
What Happens When Food Marketers Require Restrictive Farming Practices?. (2013). Sumner, Daniel ; Saitone, Tina L. ; Sexton, Richard J..
In: 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C..
RePEc:ags:aaea13:151268.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 24

References cited by this document

Cocites: 23

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Andersen L.M. (2011) “Animal welfare and eggs–cheap talk or money on the counter?” Journal of Agricultural Economics 62:565–584.

  2. Aubrey A. (2012) “Antibiotic-Free Meat Business Is Booming, Thanks To Chipotle.” Available at: http://www.npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2012/05/31/154084442/antibiotic-freemeat -business-is-booming-thanks-to-chipotle. May 31. Accessed May 8, 2013.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  3. Brorsen, B., Wade, T. Lehenbauer, D. Li, and J. Connor. (2002) “Economic Impacts of Banning Subtherapeutic Use of Antibiotics in Swine Production.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 34:489–500.

  4. Buhr, B. (2010) “Economic impact of transitioning from gestation stalls to group pen housing in the U.S. pork industry.” (Staff paper P10-4) St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.

  5. Chang J., J. Lusk, and F. Norwood. (2010) “The price of happy hens: A hedonic analysis of retail egg prices.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 35:406–423.

  6. Cheeseman G. (2012) “Safeway Exceeds Cage-Free Eggs Goal.” Available at: http:// www.triplepundit.com/2012/12/safeway-exceeds-cage-free-eggs-goal/. December 26.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  7. Chilton S., D. Burgess, and W. Hutchinson. (2006) “The relative value of farm animal welfare.” Ecological Economics 59:353–363.

  8. Cromwell, G. (2002) “Why and how antibiotics are used in swine production.” Animal Biotechnology 13:7-27.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Glass C., W. Hutchinson, and V. Beattie. (2005) “Measuring the value to the public of pig welfare improvements: a contingent valuation approach.” Animal Welfare 14:61– 69.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  10. Gracia A., M. Loureiro, and R. Nayga Jr. (2011) “Valuing an EU animal welfare label using experimental auctions.” Agricultural Economics 42:669–677.

  11. Hayes, D. and H. Jensen. (2003) “Lessons from the Danish Ban on Feed-Grade Antibiotics.” Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, Briefing Paper 03-BP 41.

  12. Hayes, D., H. Jensen, L. Backstrom, and J. Fabiosa. (2001) “Economic impact of a ban on the use of over the counter antibiotics in U.S. swine rations.” International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 4:81–97.

  13. Hobbs J. (2003) “Traceability and country of origin labeling.” In Policy Dispute Information Consortium 9th Agricultural and Food Policy Information Workshop, Montreal.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Informa Economics. (2010) “Update of Cost Assessments for Country-of-Origin Labeling—Beef & Pork (2009).” Lagerkvist, C., F. Carlsson, and D. Viske. (2006) “Swedish Consumer Preferences for Animal Welfare and Biotech: A Choice Experiment.” AgBioForum 9:51–58.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  15. Larson, B., and J. Kliebenstein. (2003) “Cost of Pork Production with Nonsubtherapeutic Use of Antibiotics,” Swine Research Report, ASL-R1820, Iowa State University, January.

  16. Lemieux, C. and M. Wohlgenant. (1989) “’Ex Ante’ Evaluation of the Economic Impact of Agricultural Biotechnology: The Case of Porcine Somatotropin.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71: 903-914.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  17. Liljenstolpe C. (2008) “Evaluating animal welfare with choice experiments: An application to Swedish pig production.” Agribusiness 24:67–84.

  18. Okrent, A. and J. Alston. (2011) “Demand for Food in the United States. A Review of Literature, Evaluation of Previous Estimates, and Presentation of New Estimates.” Giannini Foundation Monograph 48.

  19. Olynk N., G. Tonsor, and C. Wolf. (2010) “Consumer willingness to pay for livestock credence attribute claim verification.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 35:261–280.

  20. Sumner D., H. Gow, D. Hayes, W. Matthews, B. Norwood, J. Rosen-Molina, and W. Thurman. (2011) “Economic and market issues on the sustainability of egg production in the United States: Analysis of alternative production systems.” Poultry Science 90:241–250.

  21. The Humane Society of the United States. (2013) “Progress for Egg-Laying Hens.” Available at: http://www.humanesociety.org/issues/confinement_farm/timelines/ eggs_timeline.html. April 26. Accessed May 8, 2013.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  22. Tonsor G. and C. Wolf. (2011) “On mandatory labeling of animal welfare attributes.” Food Policy 36:430–437.

  23. Tonsor G., N. Olynk, and C. Wolf. (2009) “Consumer preferences for animal welfare attributes: The case of gestation crates.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 41:713–730.

  24. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (2010) “Certified Organic and Total U.S. Acreage, Selected Crops and Livestock, 1995-2008.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Higher Minimum Quality Standards and Redistributive Effects on Consumer Welfare. (2020). Pachali, Max J.
    In: Marketing Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:39:y:2020:i:1:p:253-280.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Change of Price Premiums Trend for Organic Food Products: The Example of the Polish Egg Market. (2020). Pawlewicz, Adam.
    In: Agriculture.
    RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:2:p:35-:d:315048.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Quantifying the Welfare Effects of Laying-hen Cage Ban. (2020). Vukina, Tomislav ; Oh, Sohae.
    In: 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri.
    RePEc:ags:aaea20:304408.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Social Desirability Bias in Farm Animal Welfare Preference Research. (2020). Boaitey, Albert K ; Minegishi, Kota ; Lai, Yufeng.
    In: 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri.
    RePEc:ags:aaea20:304375.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Consumer Willingness to pay for Organic and Animal Welfare Product Attributes: Do Experimental Results Align with Market Data?. (2020). Yue, Chengyan ; Lai, Yufeng.
    In: 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri.
    RePEc:ags:aaea20:304328.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Consumers Demand for Social Farming Products: An Analysis with Discrete Choice Experiments. (2019). Vecchiato, Daniel ; Tempesta, Tiziano ; Torquati, Biancamaria ; Bugatti, Maria ; Nassivera, Federico.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:23:p:6742-:d:291683.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Hen housing system information effects on U.S. egg demand. (2019). Widmar, Nicole Olynk ; Wolf, Christopher A ; Ochs, Dan ; Lai, John ; Bir, Courtney.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:87:y:2019:i:c:9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Exploring the correlation between self-reported preferences and actual purchases of nutrition labeled products. (2018). Edenbrandt, Anna Kristina ; Smed, Sinne.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:77:y:2018:i:c:p:71-80.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Organic- and Animal Welfare-labelled Eggs: Competing for the Same Consumers?. (2016). Alfnes, Frode ; Gerini, Francesca ; Schjoll, Alexander .
    In: Journal of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:jageco:v:67:y:2016:i:2:p:471-490.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Consumer Responses to Multiple and Superfluous Labels in the Case of Eggs. (2016). Heng, Yan ; Li, Xianghong ; Peterson, Hikaru Hanawa.
    In: Journal of Food Distribution Research.
    RePEc:ags:jlofdr:240708.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Product Bans May Benefit Consumers: Implications from a New Model Of Vertical Product Differentiation. (2015). Inceoglu, Firat ; Doganoglu, Toker.
    In: Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade.
    RePEc:kap:jincot:v:15:y:2015:i:2:p:155-180.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. What is the benefit of organically-reared dairy cattle? Societal perception towards conventional and organic dairy farming. (2015). Christoph-Schulz, Inken ; Weible, Daniela ; Salamon, Petra.
    In: International Journal on Food System Dynamics.
    RePEc:ags:ijofsd:208878.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. What is the benefit of organically-reared dairy cattle? Societal perception towards conventional and organic dairy farming. (2015). Christoph-Schulz, Inken ; Weible, Daniela ; Salamon, Petra.
    In: 2015 International European Forum (144th EAAE Seminar), February 9-13, 2015, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria.
    RePEc:ags:iefi15:206236.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Does Organic Crowding Out Influence Organic Food Demand? – evidence from a Danish micro panel. (2013). Hansen, Lars ; Andersen, Laura ; Lars Gårn Hansen, .
    In: IFRO Working Paper.
    RePEc:foi:wpaper:2013_2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Obtaining reliable Likelihood Ratio tests from simulated likelihood functions. (2013). Andersen, Laura.
    In: IFRO Working Paper.
    RePEc:foi:wpaper:2013_1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Reconsidering the political economy of farm animal welfare: An anatomy of market failure. (2013). Hubbard, Carmen ; Harvey, David.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:38:y:2013:i:c:p:105-114.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Consumer Attitudes toward Farm-Animal Welfare: The Case of Laying Hens. (2013). Heng, Yan ; Peterson, Hikaru Hanawa ; Li, Xianghong.
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:165936.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. What Happens When Food Marketers Require Restrictive Farming Practices?. (2013). Sumner, Daniel ; Saitone, Tina L. ; Sexton, Richard J..
    In: 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C..
    RePEc:ags:aaea13:151268.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. A Holistic Approach to Consumer Research on Expectations Regarding Animal Husbandry. (2012). Weible, Daniela ; Salamon, Petra ; Zander, Katrin ; Christoph, Inken B. ; Buergelt, Doreen .
    In: 2012 International European Forum, February 13-17, 2012, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria.
    RePEc:ags:iefi12:144963.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Consumers’ Preferences for Shell Eggs Regarding Laying Hen Welfare. (2012). Peterson, Hikaru ; Heng, Yan ; Li, Xianghong.
    In: 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington.
    RePEc:ags:aaea12:124592.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Digging deeper: How do different types of organic consumers influence the increasing organic market share?. (2011). Andersen, Laura ; Lund, Thomas Boker .
    In: IFRO Working Paper.
    RePEc:foi:wpaper:2011_15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Consumer Impact of Animal Welfare Regulation in the California Poultry Industry. (2010). Richards, Timothy ; Allender, William J..
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:97856.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-02-12 20:26:39 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.