Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

create a website
Stochastic choice and preference reversals. (2020). Garagnani, Michele ; Buckenmaier, Johannes ; Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos.
In: ECON - Working Papers.
RePEc:zur:econwp:370.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 76

References cited by this document

Cocites: 62

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Attentional shifts and preference reversals: An eye-tracking study. (2021). ALS-FERRER, CARLOS ; Jaudas, Alexander ; Ritschel, Alexander.
    In: Judgment and Decision Making.
    RePEc:jdm:journl:v:16:y:2021:i:1:p:57-93.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Alós-Ferrer, C., D.-G. Granić, J. Kern, and A. K. Wagner (2016). Preference Reversals: Time and Again. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 52(1), 65–97.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Alós-Ferrer, C., E. Fehr, and N. Netzer (2020). Time Will Tell: Recovering Preferences when Choices are Noisy. Journal of Political Economy forthcoming.

  3. Andersen, S., G. W. Harrison, M. I. Lau, and E. E. Rutström (2006). Elicitation Using Multiple Price List Formats. Experimental Economics 9(4), 383–405.

  4. Apesteguı́a, J. and M. A. Ballester (2018). Monotone Stochastic Choice Models: The Case of Risk and Time Preferences. Journal of Political Economy 126(1), 74–106.

  5. Atkinson, A. C. (1996). The Usefulness of Optimum Experimental Designs. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 51(1), 59–76.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Attema, A. E. and W. B. Brouwer (2013). In Search of a Preferred Preference Elicitation Method: A Test of the Internal Consistency of Choice and Matching Tasks. Journal of Economic Psychology 39, 126–140.

  7. Azrieli, Y., C. P. Chambers, and P. J. Healy (2018). Incentives in Experiments: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Political Economy 126(4), 1472–1503.

  8. Ballinger, T. P. and N. T. Wilcox (1997). Decisions, Error and Heterogeneity. Economic Journal 107(443), 1090–1105.

  9. Bateman, I. J., R. T. Carson, B. Day, M. Hanemann, N. Hanley, T. Hett, M. J. Lee, G. Loomes, S. Mourato, E. Ozdemiroglu, D. W. Pearce, R. Sugden, and J. Swanson (2002). Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual. Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar.

  10. Bateman, I., B. Day, G. Loomes, and R. Sugden (2007). Can Ranking Techniques Elicit Robust Values? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 34(1), 49–66.

  11. Beauchamp, J. P., D. J. Benjamin, D. I. Laibson, and C. F. Chabris (2019). Measuring and Controlling for the Compromise Effect when Estimating Risk Preference Parameters. Experimental Economics forthcoming.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Bellemare, C., S. Kröger, and A. van Soest (2008). Measuring Inequity Aversion in a Heterogeneous Population Using Experimental Decisions and Subjective Probabilities. Econometrica 76(4), 815–839.

  13. Bleichrodt, H. and J. L. Pinto Prades (2009). New Evidence of Preference Reversals in Health Utility Measurement. Health Economics 18(6), 713–726.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Bordalo, P., N. Gennaioli, and A. Shleifer (2013). Salience and Consumer Choice. Journal of Political Economy 121(5), 803–843.

  15. Bostic, R., R. J. Herrnstein, and R. D. Luce (1990). The Effect on the PreferenceReversal Phenomenon of Using Choice Indifferences. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 13, 193–212.

  16. Bruner, D. M. (2017). Does Decision Error Decrease with Risk Aversion? Experimental Economics 20(1), 259–273.

  17. Butler, D. and G. Loomes (1988). Decision Difficulty and Imprecise Preferences. Acta Psychologica 68(1-3), 183–196.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Butler, D. J. and G. Loomes (2007). Imprecision as an Account of the Preference Reversal Phenomenon. American Economic Review 97(1), 277–297.

  19. Butler, D. J. and G. Loomes (2011). Imprecision as an Account of Violations of Independence and Betweenness. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 80, 511–522.

  20. Butler, D., A. Isoni, G. Loomes, and K. Tsutsui (2014). Beyond Choice: Investigating the Sensitivity and Validity of Measures of Strength of Preference. Experimental Economics 17(4), 537–563.

  21. Camerer, C. F. (1989). Does the Basketball Market Believe in the ‘Hot Hand’. American Economic Review 79, 1257–1261.

  22. Cappellari, L. and S. P. Jenkins (2003). Multivariate Probit Regression Using Simulated Maximum Likelihood. The Stata Journal 3(3), 278–294.

  23. Casey, J. T. (1991). Reversal of the Preference Reversal Phenomenon. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 48(2), 224–251.

  24. Collins, S. M. and D. James (2015). Response Mode and Stochastic Choice Together Explain Preference Reversals. Quantitative Economics 6(3), 825–856.

  25. Cubitt, R. P., A. Munro, and C. Starmer (2004). Testing Explanations of Preference Reversal. Economic Journal 114(497), 709–726.

  26. Cubitt, R. P., D. Navarro-Martinez, and C. Starmer (2015). On Preference Imprecision. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 50(1), 1–34.

  27. Dashiell, J. F. (1937). Affective Value-Distances as a Determinant of Aesthetic Judgment-Times. American Journal of Psychology 50, 57–67.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Davidson, D. and J. Marschak (1959). Experimental Tests of a Stochastic Decision Theory. In W. Churchman and P. Ratoosh (Eds.), Measurement: Definitions and Theories, Volume I, Part I, pp. 233–269. New York: Wiley.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Delquié, P. (1993). Inconsistent Trade-Offs Between Attributes: New Evidence in Preference Assessment Biases. Management Science 39(11), 1382–1395.

  30. Dubourg, W. R., M. W. Jones-Lee, and G. Loomes (1994). Imprecise Preferences and the WTP-WTA Disparity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 9(2), 115–133.

  31. Ford, I., B. Torsney, and C. J. Wu (1992). The Use of a Canonical Form in the Construction of Locally Optimal Designs for Non-Linear Problems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 54(2), 569–583.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Goldstein, W. M. and H. J. Einhorn (1987). Expression Theory and the Preference Reversal Phenomena. Psychological Review 94(2), 236–254.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Greiner, B. (2015). Subject Pool Recruitment Procedures: Organizing Experiments with ORSEE. Journal of the Economic Science Association 1, 114–125.

  34. Grether, D. M. and C. R. Plott (1979). Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon. American Economic Review 69(4), 623–638.

  35. Halton, J. H. (1960). On the Efficiency of Certain Quasi-Random Sequences of Points in Evaluating Multi-Dimensional Integrals. Numerische Mathematik 2(1), 84–90.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Hershey, J. C. and P. J. H. Schoemaker (1985). Probability versus Certainty Equivalence Methods in Utility Measurement: Are They Equivalent? Management Science 31(10), 1213–1231.

  37. Hey, J. D. and C. Orme (1994). Investigating Generalizations of Expected Utility Theory Using Experimental Data. Econometrica 62(6), 1291–1326.

  38. Holt, C. A. (1986). Preference Reversals and the Independence Axiom. American Economic Review 76(3), 508–515.

  39. Holt, C. A. and S. K. Laury (2002). Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects. American Economic Review 92(5), 1644–1655.

  40. Johnson, E. J. and D. A. Schkade (1989). Bias in Utility Assessments: Further Evidence and Explanations. Management Science 35(4), 406–424.

  41. Karni, E. and Z. Safra (1987). ‘Preference Reversal’ and the Observability of Preferences by Experimental Methods. Econometrica 55(3), 675–685.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Laming, D. (1985). Some Principles of Sensory Analysis. Psychological Review 92(4), 462–485.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Lichtenstein, S. and P. Slovic (1971). Reversals of Preference Between Bids and Choices in Gambling Decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 89(1), 46–55.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Lindman, H. R. (1971). Inconsistent Preferences Among Gambles. Journal of Experimental Psychology 89(2), 390–397.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Lipkus, I. M., G. Samsa, and B. K. Rimer (2001). General Performance on a Numeracy Scale Among Highly Educated Samples. Medical Decision Making 21(1), 37–44.

  46. Loomes, G. (2005). Modelling the Stochastic Component of Behaviour in Experiments: Some Issues for the Interpretation of Data. Experimental Economics 8(4), 301–323.

  47. Loomes, G. and G. Pogrebna (2017). Do Preference Reversals Disappear When We Allow for Probabilistic Choice? Management Science 63(1), 166–184.

  48. Loomes, G. and R. Sugden (1995). Incorporating a Stochastic Element into Decision Theories. European Economic Review 39(3–4), 641–648.

  49. Loomes, G. and R. Sugden (1998). Testing Different Stochastic Specifications of Risky Choice. Economica 65(260), 581–598.

  50. Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Wiley.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Maafi, H. (2011). Preference Reversals Under Ambiguity. Management Science 57(11), 2054–2066.

  52. McFadden, D. L. (2001). Economic Choices. American Economic Review 91(3), 351– 378.

  53. Moffatt, P. G. (2005). Stochastic Choice and the Allocation of Cognitive Effort. Experimental Economics 8(4), 369–388.

  54. Moffatt, P. G. (2015). Experimetrics: Econometrics for Experimental Economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Morrison, G. C. (1998). Understanding the Disparity between WTP and WTA: Endowment Effect, Substitutability, or Imprecise Preferences? Economics Letters 59(2), 189–194.

  56. Mosteller, F. and P. Nogee (1951). An Experimental Measurement of Utility. Journal of Political Economy 59, 371–404.

  57. Moyer, R. S. and T. K. Landauer (1967). Time Required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality. Nature 215(5109), 1519–1520.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Oliver, A. (2013). Testing Procedural Invariance in the Context of Health. Health Economics 22(3), 272–288.

  59. Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy – Psychophysics Software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 162(1), 8–13.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Pommerehne, W. W., F. Schneider, and P. Zweifel (1982). Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon: A Reexamination. American Economic Review 72(3), 569–574.

  61. Safra, Z., U. Segal, and A. Spivak (1990). Preference Reversal and Nonexpected Utility Behavior. American Economic Review 80(4), 922–930.

  62. Schkade, D. A. and E. J. Johnson (1989). Cognitive processes in preference reversals. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 44(2), 203–231.

  63. Schmidt, U. and J. D. Hey (2004). Are Preference Reversals Errors? An Experimental Investigation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 29(3), 207–218.

  64. Seidl, C. (2002). Preference Reversal. Journal of Economic Surveys 16(5), 621–655.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Silvey, S. D. (1980). Optimal Design: An Introduction to the Theory for Parameter Estimation, Volume 1. New York: Chapman and Hall.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Slovic, P. and S. Lichtenstein (1968). Relative Importance of Probabilities and Payoffs in Risk Taking. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph 78(3, Part 2), 1–18.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Stalmeier, P. F. M., P. P. Wakker, and T. G. G. Bezembinder (1997). Preference Reversals: Violations of Unidimensional Procedure Invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23(4), 1196–1205.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Train, K. E. (2003). Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  69. Trautmann, S. T., F. M. Vieider, and P. P. Wakker (2011). Preference Reversals for Ambiguity Aversion. Management Science 57(7), 1320–1333.

  70. Tversky, A. (1969). Intransitivity of Preferences. Psychological Review 76, 31–48.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Tversky, A. and R. H. Thaler (1990). Anomalies: Preference Reversals. Journal of Economic Perspectives 4(2), 201–211.

  72. Tversky, A., P. Slovic, and D. Kahneman (1990). The Causes of Preference Reversal. American Economic Review 80(1), 204–217.

  73. Vieider, F. M. (2018). Violence and Risk Preference: Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan, Comment. American Economic Review 108(8), 2366–2382.

  74. Wichmann, A. F. and N. J. Hill (2001). The Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 63(8), 1293–1313.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  75. Wilcox, N. T. (2008). Stochastic Models for Binary Discrete Choice Under Risk: A Critical Primer and Econometric Comparison. In J. C. Cox and G. W. Harrison (Eds.), Risk Aversion in Experiments, Volume 12 of Research in Experimental Economics, pp. 197–292. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. Wilcox, N. T. (2011). Stochastically More Risk Averse: A Contextual Theory of Stochastic Discrete Choice Under Risk. Journal of Econometrics 162(1), 89–104.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Strength of preference and decisions under risk. (2022). Garagnani, Michele ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:64:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s11166-022-09381-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Updating stochastic choice. (2021). Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Mihm, Maximilian ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos.
    In: ECON - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:econwp:381.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Happy times: identification from ordered response data. (2020). Netzer, Nick ; Liu, Shuo.
    In: ECON - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:econwp:371.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Stochastic choice and preference reversals. (2020). Garagnani, Michele ; Buckenmaier, Johannes ; Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos.
    In: ECON - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:econwp:370.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. An economist and a psychologist form a line: What can imperfect perception of length tell us about stochastic choice?. (2020). Smith, John ; Duffy, Sean.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:99417.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Multinomial logit processes and preference discovery: outside and inside the black box. (2020). Marinacci, Massimo ; Cerreia-Vioglio, Simone ; Maccheroni, Fabio.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:igi:igierp:663.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Multinomial logit processes and preference discovery: outside and inside the black box. (2020). Rustichini, Aldo ; Marinacci, Massimo ; Maccheroni, Fabio ; Cerreia-Vioglio, Simone.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2004.13376.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Strength of preference and decision making under risk. (2019). Garagnani, Michele ; Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos.
    In: ECON - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:econwp:330.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Judgments of length in the economics laboratory: Are there brains in choice?. (2019). Smith, John ; Gussman, Steven ; Duffy, Sean.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:93126.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Rational Inattention when Decisions Take Time. (2019). Woodford, Michael ; Hebert, Benjamin M.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:26415.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Testing the Drift-Diffusion Model. (2019). Strzalecki, Tomasz ; Fudenberg, Drew ; Strack, Philipp ; Newey, Whitney K.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1908.05824.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Procedures for eliciting time preferences. (2016). Mittone, Luigi ; Mariotti, Marco ; Manzini, Paola ; Freeman, David.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:126:y:2016:i:pa:p:235-242.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Heterogeneity in risk attitudes across domains: A bivariate random preference approach. (2015). Moffatt, Peter ; conte, anna ; Riddel, Mary .
    In: Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS).
    RePEc:uea:wcbess:15-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Average player traits as predictors of cooperation in a repeated prisoners dilemma. (2014). Jones, Garett ; Al-Ubaydli, Omar ; Weel, Jaap .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:55383.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. A reconsideration of gender differences in risk attitudes. (2014). Filippin, Antonio ; Crosetto, Paolo.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:gbl:wpaper:2014-01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Comparing Decisions under Compound Risk and Ambiguity: The Importance of Cognitive Skills. (2014). Prokosheva, Sasha .
    In: CERGE-EI Working Papers.
    RePEc:cer:papers:wp525.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. An experimental approach to valuing information. (2014). Tonsor, Glynn ; Schroeder, Ted ; Lusk, Jayson ; Klain, Tyler J..
    In: Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:agecon:v:45:y:2014:i:5:p:635-648.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Risk aversion relates to cognitive ability: Fact or Fiction?. (2013). Wengström, Erik ; Tyran, Jean-Robert ; Holm, Hakan ; Andersson, Ola ; Wengstrom, Erik.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:kud:kuiedp:1310.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The Role of Emotions on Risk Preferences: An Experimental Analysis. (2013). Nardi, Chiara ; Levati, Maria ; conte, anna.
    In: Jena Economic Research Papers.
    RePEc:jrp:jrpwrp:2013-046.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. In sickness but not in wealth: Field evidence on patients? risk preferences in the financial and health domain. (2013). Stavropoulou, C ; Miraldo, M ; Galizzi, M.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:imp:wpaper:12579.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Attitudes towards Risk of Forest Dependent Communities - Evidence from Andhra Pradesh. (2013). Sundar, B. ; Virmani, Vineet .
    In: IIMA Working Papers.
    RePEc:iim:iimawp:12147.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Risk Aversion Relates to Cognitive Ability: Fact or Fiction?. (2013). Wengström, Erik ; Tyran, Jean-Robert ; Holm, Hakan ; Andersson, Ola ; Wengstrom, Erik.
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:hhs:iuiwop:0964.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Intertemporal Choice Shifts in Households: Do they occur and are they good?. (2013). Carlsson, Fredrik ; Yang, Xiaojun .
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0569.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Human capital investment by the poor: Informing policy with laboratory experiments. (2013). Montmarquette, Claude ; Eckel, Catherine ; Johnson, Cathleen .
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:95:y:2013:i:c:p:224-239.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Experimental methods: Eliciting risk preferences. (2013). Imas, Alex ; gneezy, uri ; Charness, Gary.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:87:y:2013:i:c:p:43-51.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. A Study of Outcome Reporting Bias Using Gender Differences in Risk Attitudes. (2013). Filippin, Antonio ; Crosetto, Paolo ; Heider, Janna .
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_4466.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Gender Differences in Risk Aversion: Do Single-Sex Environments Affect their Development?. (2013). Nolen, Patrick ; Cardona-Sosa, Lina ; Booth, Alison.
    In: Borradores de Economia.
    RePEc:bdr:borrec:786.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Risk and Time Preferences of West African Cattle Farmers. (2013). Waibel, Hermann ; Liebenehm, Sabine.
    In: 53rd Annual Conference, Berlin, Germany, September 25-27, 2013.
    RePEc:ags:gewi13:156110.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. The incorporation of subjective risks into choice experiments to test scenario adjustment. (2013). Shaw, Douglass W. ; Cerroni, Simone ; Notaro, Sandra ; Raffaelli, Roberta .
    In: 2013 Second Congress, June 6-7, 2013, Parma, Italy.
    RePEc:ags:aiea13:149894.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Time Preference and Technology Adoption: A Single-Choice Experiment with U.S. Farmers. (2013). Duquette, Eric ; Higgins, Nathaniel ; Horowitz, John.
    In: 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C..
    RePEc:ags:aaea13:150719.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Human capital investment by the poor: Informing policy with laboratory experiments. (2012). Montmarquette, Claude ; Eckel, Catherine ; Johnson, Cathleen .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:47782.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Risk Aversion: Experimental Evidence from South African Fishing Communities. (2012). Visser, Martine ; Burns, Justine ; Brick, Kerri .
    In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:94:y:2012:i:1:p:133-152.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Characterizing commercial cattle farms in Namibia: risk, management and sustainability. (2012). Quaas, Martin ; Baumgärtner, Stefan ; Baumgaertner, Stefan ; Olbrich, Roland .
    In: Working Paper Series in Economics.
    RePEc:lue:wpaper:248.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Taxes, minimum-quality standards and/or product labeling to improve environmental quality and welfare: Experiments can provide answers. (2012). marette, stéphan ; Disdier, Anne-Célia.
    In: Journal of Regulatory Economics.
    RePEc:kap:regeco:v:41:y:2012:i:3:p:337-357.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. An experimental investigation on optimal bankruptcy laws. (2012). Spallone, Marco ; Di Cagno, Daniela.
    In: European Journal of Law and Economics.
    RePEc:kap:ejlwec:v:33:y:2012:i:1:p:205-229.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Estimating the relationship between rate of time preferences and socio-economic factors in Russia. (2012). Sheluntcova, Maria ; Kossova, Tatiana.
    In: HSE Working papers.
    RePEc:hig:wpaper:23/ec/2012.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Intra-household decisions making on intertemporal choices: An experimental study in rural China. (2012). Carlsson, Fredrik ; Yang, Xiaojun .
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0537.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. How do consumers in developed countries value the environment and workers’ social rights in developing countries?. (2012). marette, stéphan ; Disdier, Anne-Célia.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:37:y:2012:i:1:p:1-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. The regulation of non-point source pollution and risk preferences: An experimental approach. (2012). Requate, Till ; Camacho Cuena, Eva ; Camacho-Cuena, Eva.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:73:y:2012:i:c:p:179-187.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Does Good Advice Come Cheap?: On the Assessment of Risk Preferences in the Lab and in the Field. (2012). Leuermann, Andrea ; Roth, Benjamin .
    In: SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research.
    RePEc:diw:diwsop:diw_sp475.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Does good advice come cheap? - On the assessment of risk preferences in the lab and the field. (2012). Leuermann, Andrea ; Roth, Benjamin .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:awi:wpaper:0534.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Accounting for farmers’ risk preferences in investigating land allocation decisions in marginal environments: a test of various elicitation measures in an application from Vietnam. (2012). Keil, Alwin ; Nielsen, Thea .
    In: 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil.
    RePEc:ags:iaae12:126054.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Risk Aversion: Experimental Evidence from South African Fishing Communities. (2011). Visser, Martine ; Burns, Justine ; Brick, Kerri .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:rza:wpaper:227.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Within-subject Intra- and Inter-method consistency of two experimental risk attitude elicitation. (2011). Dulleck, Uwe ; Fell, Jacob ; Fooken, Jonas.
    In: NCER Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:qut:auncer:2011_5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Risk preferences under heterogeneous environmental risk. (2011). Quaas, Martin ; Baumgärtner, Stefan ; Haensler, Andreas ; Baumgaertner, Stefan ; Olbrich, Roland .
    In: Working Paper Series in Economics.
    RePEc:lue:wpaper:208.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Heterogeneity in Risky Choice Behavior in a Broad Population. (2011). Wengström, Erik ; von Gaudecker, Hans-Martin ; van soest, arthur ; Wengstrom, Erik.
    In: American Economic Review.
    RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:101:y:2011:i:2:p:664-94.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Patience, cognitive skill and coordination in the repeated stag hunt. (2010). Jones, Garett ; Al-Ubaydli, Omar ; Weel, Jaap .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:27723.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Bounding Preference Parameters under Different Assumptions about Beliefs: a Partial Identification Approach. (2010). Kröger, Sabine ; Bissonnette, Luc ; Bellemare, Charles ; Kroger, Sabine.
    In: Cahiers de recherche.
    RePEc:lvl:lacicr:1017.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Rationality on the rise: Why relative risk aversion increases with stake size. (2010). Epper, Thomas ; Bruhin, Adrian ; Schubert, Renate ; Fehr-Duda, Helga.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:40:y:2010:i:2:p:147-180.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. ‘Give me a chance!’ An experiment in social decision under risk. (2010). Le Lec, Fabrice ; Krawczyk, Michal ; LeLec, Fabrice .
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:13:y:2010:i:4:p:500-511.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  51. Bounding preference parameters under different assumptions about beliefs: a partial identification approach. (2010). Kröger, Sabine ; Bissonnette, Luc ; Bellemare, Charles ; Kroger, Sabine.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:13:y:2010:i:3:p:334-345.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  52. The irrelevant-menu affect on valuation. (2010). Sonsino, Doron.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:13:y:2010:i:3:p:309-333.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  53. Preference heterogeneity in experiments: Comparing the field and laboratory. (2010). Rutstrom, Elisabet ; Lau, Morten ; Harrison, Glenn ; Andersen, Steffen.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:73:y:2010:i:2:p:209-224.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  54. Would consumers value food-away-from-home products with nutritional labels?. (2009). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Lazaridis, Panagiotis ; Drichoutis, Andreas.
    In: Agribusiness.
    RePEc:wly:agribz:v:25:y:2009:i:4:p:550-575.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  55. Choices under Risk in Rural Peru. (2009). Galarza, Francisco.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:17708.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  56. Are risk preferences stable? Comparing an experimental measure with a validated survey-based measure. (2009). Mellor, Jennifer ; Anderson, Lisa.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:39:y:2009:i:2:p:137-160.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  57. Learning from mistakes: What do inconsistent choices over risk tell us?. (2009). Petrie, Ragan ; Jacobson, Sarah.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:38:y:2009:i:2:p:143-158.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  58. Changing the probability versus changing the reward. (2009). Bruner, David.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:12:y:2009:i:4:p:367-385.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  59. Individual and Couple Decision Behavior under Risk: The Power of Ultimate Control. (2008). Ziegelmeyer, Anthony ; Picard, Nathalie ; de Palma, André.
    In: Papers on Strategic Interaction.
    RePEc:esi:discus:2006-22.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  60. Individual and Couple Decision Behavior under Risk:The Power of Ultimate Control. (2007). Ziegelmeyer, Anthony ; Picard, Nathalie ; de Palma, André.
    In: THEMA Working Papers.
    RePEc:ema:worpap:2007-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  61. Risk aversion and embedding bias. (2006). Silvestre, Joaquim ; bosch-domènech, antoni ; Bosch-Domenech, Antoni.
    In: Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:upf:upfgen:934.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  62. Too much cocited documents. This list is not complete

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-12 21:21:34 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.