Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Geographical clustering and the effectiveness of public innovation programs. (2016). Rammer, Christian ; Crass, Dirk ; Aschhoff, Birgit .
In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
RePEc:zbw:zewdip:16083.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 5

Citations received by this document

Cites: 76

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Why are there so few hard facts about the impact of cluster policies in Germany? A critical review of evaluation studies. (2021). Rothgang, Michael ; Lageman, Bernhard ; Scholz, Anne-Marie.
    In: Review of Evolutionary Political Economy.
    RePEc:spr:revepe:v:2:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s43253-021-00034-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Innovationstätigkeit der Unternehmen in Ostdeutschland seit der Wiedervereinigung: Studie im Auftrag der Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation. (2020). Rammer, Christian ; Gottschalk, Sandra ; Trunschke, Markus.
    In: Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem.
    RePEc:zbw:efisdi:72020.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Den Strukturwandel meistern. Jahresgutachten 2019/20. (2019). Wieland, Volker ; Truger, Achim ; Schnabel, Isabel ; Schmidt, Christoph M ; Feld, Lars P.
    In: Annual Economic Reports / Jahresgutachten.
    RePEc:zbw:svrwjg:201920.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. THE POTENTIAL FOR CLUSTER IMPLEMENTATION IN THE ROMANIAN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM. (2019). Morrescu, Cristina ; Tefan, Simona Ctlina ; Popa, Ion ; Gora, Ana Alexandra.
    In: Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE.
    RePEc:rom:mancon:v:13:y:2019:i:1:p:436-447.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Geographical clustering and the evaluation of cluster policies: introduction. (2019). Rothgang, Michael ; Graf, Holger ; Cantner, Uwe.
    In: The Journal of Technology Transfer.
    RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:44:y:2019:i:6:d:10.1007_s10961-018-9666-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Aerts, K., T. Schmidt (2008), Two for the price of one? Additionality effects of R&D subsidies: a comparison between Flanders and Germany, Research Policy 37, 806– 822.

  2. Almus, M., D. Czarnitzki (2003), The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms' innovation activities: the case of Eastern Germany, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 21, 226–236.

  3. Aschhoff, B. (2010), Who gets the money? The dynamics of R&D project subsidies in Germany, The Journal of Economics and Statistics 230(5), 522–546.

  4. Asheima, B.T., L. Coenen (2005), Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters, Research Policy 34(8), 1173–1190.

  5. Audretsch, D., P. Stephan (1996), Company-scientist locational links: the case of biotechnology, American Economic Review 86(3), 641–652.

  6. Audretsch, D.B., E.E. Lehmann, S. Warning (2005), University spillovers and new firm location, Research Policy 34, 1113–1122.

  7. Audretsch, D.B., M.P. Feldman (1996), R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production, American Economic Review 83, 630–640.

  8. Audretsch, D.B., M.P. Feldman (2004), Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation, in J.V. Henderson, J.F. Thisse (eds.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Dordrecht: Elsevier, 2714–2735.

  9. Baptista, R., G.P. Swann (1998), Do Firms in clusters innovate more?, Research Policy 27(5), 525–540.

  10. Beaudry, C., S. Breschi (2003), Are firms in clusters really more innovative? Economics of Innovation and New Technology 12(4), 325–342.

  11. Bersch, J., S. Gottschalk, B. Müller, M. Niefert (2014), The Mannheim Enterprise Panel (MUP) and Firm Statistics for Germany, ZEW Discussion Paper No. 14-104, Mannheim.

  12. Berube, C., P. Mohnen (2009), Are firms that received R&D subsidies more innovative?, Canadian Journal of Economics 42(1), 206–225.

  13. Boschma, R. (2005), Proximity and innovation. A critical assessment, Regional Studies 39, 61–74.

  14. Branstetter, L.G., M. Sakakibara (2002), When do research consortia work well and why? Evidence from Japanese panel data, American Economic Review 92(1), 143–159.

  15. Breschi, S., F. Malerba (2001), The geography of innovation and economic clustering: some introductory notes, Industrial and Corporate Change 10(4), 817–833.

  16. Colombo, M.G., C. Franzoni, R. Veugelers (2014), Going radical: producing and transferring disruptive innovation, The Journal of Technology Transfer (DOI 10.1007/s10961-0149361 -z).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  17. Cooke, P. (2001), Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy, Industrial and Corporate Change 10(4), 945–974.

  18. Crépon, B., E. Duguet, J. Mairesse (1998), Research, innovation and productivity: an econometric analysis at the firm level, Economics of Innovation and New Technology 7(2), 115–158.

  19. Czarnitzki, D., B. Ebersberger, A. Fier (2007), The relationship between R&D collaboration, subsidies and R&D performance: empirical evidence from Finland and Germany, Journal of Applied Econometrics 22(7), 1347–1366.

  20. Czarnitzki, D., C. Lopes-Bento (2012), Evaluation of public R&D policies: a cross-country comparison, World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development 9(24) , 254–282.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  21. Czarnitzki, D., C. Lopes-Bento (2013), Value for money? New microeconometric evidence on public R&D grants in Flanders, Research Policy 42, 76–89.

  22. Czarnitzki, D., C. Lopes-Bento (2014), Innovation subsidies: Does the funding source matter for innovation intensity and performance? Empirical evidence from Germany, Industry and Innovation 21(5), 380–409.

  23. Czarnitzki, D., H. Hottenrott (2009), Are local milieus the key to innovation performance?, Journal of Regional Science 49(1), 81–112.

  24. Eickelpasch, A., M. Fritsch (2005), Contests for cooperation—A new approach in German innovation policy, Research Policy 34(8), 1269–1282.

  25. Falck, O., S. Heblich, S. Kipar (2010), Industrial innovation: direct evidence from a clusteroriented policy, Regional Science and Urban Economics 40, 574–582.

  26. Feldman, M.P., D.B. Audretsch (1999), Innovation in cities: science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition, European Economic Review 43(2), 409–429.

  27. Florida, R. (2002), The economic geography of talent, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92(4), 743–755.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  28. Folta, T., A.C. Cooper, Y. Baik (2006), Geographic cluster size and firm performance, Journal of Business Venturing 21(2), 217–242.

  29. Frietsch, R., M. Schüller (eds.) (2010), Competing for Global Innovation Leadership: Innovation Systems and Policies in the USA, EU and Asia, Stuttgart: Fraunhofer IRB Verlag.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  30. Fromhold-Eisebith, M., G. Eisebith (2005), How to institutionalize innovative clusters? Comparing explicit top-down and implicit bottom-up approaches, Research Policy 34(8), 1250–1268.

  31. Gerlach, H., T. Rønde, K. Stahl (2009), Labor pooling in R&D intensive industries, Journal of Urban Economics 65(1), 99–111.

  32. Glaeser, E., H. Kallal, J.A. Scheinkman, A. Shleifer (1992), Growth of cities, Journal of Political Economy 100, 1126–1152.

  33. Harhoff, D., J. Henkel, E. von Hippel (2003), Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: how users benefit by freely revealing their innovations, Research Policy 32(10), 1753– 1769.

  34. Heckman, J. (1979), Sample selection bias as a specification error, Econometrica 47(1), 153– 161.

  35. Helsley, R.W, W.C. Strange (2002), Innovation and input sharing, Journal of Urban Economics 51(1), 25–45.

  36. Hospers, G.-J., P. Desrochers, F. Sautet (2009), The next Silicon Valley? On the relationship between geographical clustering and public policy, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 5, 285–299.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  37. Hottenrott, H., C. Lopes-Bento (2014), (International) R&D collaboration and SMEs: the effectiveness of targeted public R&D support schemes, Research Policy 43, 1055– 1066.

  38. Hussinger, K. (2008), R&D and subsidies at the firm level: an application of parametric and semiparametric two-step selection models, Journal of Applied Econometrics 23(6), 729–747.

  39. Jacobs, J. (1969), The Economy of Cities, New York: Random House.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  40. Jaffe, A.B. (1989), Real effects of academic research, American Economic Review 79(5), 957–970.

  41. Jaffe, A.B., M. Trajtenberg, R. Henderson (1993), Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations, Quarterly Journal of Economics 63, 577– 598.

  42. Klepper, S. (2010), The origin and growth of industry clusters: the making of Silicon Valley and Detroit, Journal of Urban Economics 67, 15–32.

  43. Kortum, S, J. Lerner (2000), Assessing the contribution of venture capital to innovation, RAND Journal of Economics 31(4), 674–692.

  44. Krugman, P. (1991), Increasing returns and economic geography, Journal of Political Economy 99, 483–499.

  45. Kukalis, S. (2010), Agglomeration economies and firm performance: the case of industry clusters, Journal of Management 36(2), 453–481.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  46. Lach, S. (2002), Do R&D subsidies stimulate or displace private R&D? Evidence from Israel, Journal of Industrial Economics 50(4), 369–390.

  47. Love, J.H., S. Roper (2001a), Location and network effects on innovation success: evidence for UK, German and Irish manufacturing plants, Research Policy 30(4), 643–661.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Love, J.H., S. Roper (2001b), Outsourcing in the innovation process: locational and strategic determinants, Papers in Regional Science 80(3), 317–336.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Maillat, D. (1995), Territorial dynamic, innovative milieus and regional policy, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 7, 157–165.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  50. Mansfield, E. (1995), Academic research underlying industrial innovations: sources, characteristics, and financing, Review of Economics and Statistics 77(1), 55–65.

  51. Marshall, A. (1890), Principles of Economics, London: Macmillan.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  52. Martin, R., P. Sunley (1998), Slow convergence? The new endogenous growth theory and regional development, Economic Geography 74(3), 201–227.

  53. Martin, R., P. Sunley (2003), Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea?, Journal of Economic Geography 3, 5–35.

  54. McCann, B., T.B. Folta (2011), Performance differentials within geographic clusters, Journal of Business Venturing 26, 104–123.

  55. McDonald, F., D. Tsagdis, Q. Huang (2006), The development of industrial clusters and public policy, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 18, 525–542.

  56. Nishimura, J., H. Okamuro (2011a), R&D productivity and the organization of cluster policy: an empirical evaluation of the Industrial Cluster Project in Japan, Journal of Technology Transfer 36(2), 117–144.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Nishimura, J., H. Okamuro (2011b), Subsidy and networking: the effects of direct and indirect support programs of the cluster policy, Research Policy 40, 714–727.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. OECD and Eurostat (2005), Oslo Manual. Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd Edition, Paris: OECD.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  59. Perroux, F. (1950), Economic spaces: theory and application, Quarterly Journal of Economics 64, 90–97.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  60. Peters, B., C. Rammer (2013), Innovation panel surveys in Germany, in F. Gault (ed.), Handbook of Innovation Indicators and Measurement, Cheltenham and Northhampton: Edward Elgar, 135-177.

  61. Porter, M.E. (1998), Clusters and competition: new agendas for companies, governments, and institutions, in M.E. Porter (ed.), On Competition, Cambridge: Harvard Business School Publishing, 197-287.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  62. Rammer, C., D. Crass, T. Doherr, M. Hud, P. Hünermund, Y. Iferd, C. Köhler, B. Peters, T. Schubert (2016), Innovationsverhalten der deutschen Wirtschaft - Indikatorenbericht zur Innovationserhebung 2015, Mannheim: Centre for European Economic Research.

  63. Roper, S., J.H. Love, B. Ashcroft, S. Dunlop (2000), Industry and location effects on UK plants’ innovation propensity, The Annals of Regional Science 34(4), 489–502.

  64. Sakakibara, M. (2001), The diversity of R&D consortia and firm behaviour: evidence from Japanese data, The Journal of Industrial Economics 49(2), 181–196.

  65. Saxenian, A. (1991), The origins and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley, Research Policy 20, 423–437.

  66. Saxenian, A. (1994), Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Schmoch, U. (2008), Concept of a Technology Classification for Country Comparisons. Final Report to the World Intellectual Property Office (WIPO), Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Schmoch, U., F. Laville, P. Patel, R. Frietsch (2003), Linking Technology Areas to Industrial Sectors. Final Report to the European Commission, DG Research, Karlsruhe et al.: Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  69. Shefer, D., A. Frenke (1998), Local milieu and innovations: some empirical results, The Annals of Regional Science 32(1), 185–200.

  70. Sorenson, O., T. Stuart (2001), Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments, American Journal of Sociology 106, 1546–1588.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  71. Tödtling, F., M. Trippl (2005), One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach, Research Policy 34(8), 1203–1219.

  72. Takalo, T., T. Tanayama, O. Toivanen (2013), Estimating the benefits of targeted R&D subsidies, Review of Economics and Statistics 95(1), 255–272.

  73. Tallman, S., M. Jenkins, N. Henry, S. Pinch (2004), Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage, Academy of Management Review 29, 258–271.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  74. Uyarra, E., R. Ramlogan (2016), The impact of cluster policy on innovation, in J. Edler, P. Cunningham, A. Gök, P. Shapira (eds.), Handbook of Innovation Policy Impact, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 196–225.

  75. van der Panne, G. (2004), Agglomeration externalities: Marshall versus Jacobs, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14, 593–604.

  76. Wallsten, S.J. (2000), The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: the case Small Business Innovation Research Program, RAND Journal of Economics 31(1), 82–100.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Does government support for private innovation matter? Firm-level evidence from two catching-up countries. (2017). Tandoğan, Vedat ; Szczygielski, Krzysztof ; Pamukçu, Mehmet ; Grabowski, Wojciech ; Tandogan, Vedat Sinan ; Pamukcu, Mehmet Teoman .
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:46:y:2017:i:1:p:219-237.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Geographical clustering and the effectiveness of public innovation programs. (2016). Rammer, Christian ; Crass, Dirk ; Aschhoff, Birgit .
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:16083.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. The contribution of different public innovation funding programs to SMEs export performance. (2016). Rammer, Christian ; Liu, Rebecca .
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:16078.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Explaining firm sensitivity to R&D subsidies within a dose-response model: The role of financial constraints, real cost of investment, and strategic value of R&D. (2016). Cerulli, Giovanni ; Poti, Bianca .
    In: DEM Working Papers.
    RePEc:trn:utwprg:2016/09.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Firm Subsidies and the Innovation Output: What Can We Learn by Looking at Multiple Investment Inputs?. (2016). Sembenelli, Alessandro ; Cosconati, Marco .
    In: Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti.
    RePEc:spr:italej:v:2:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s40797-015-0025-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Long run effect of public grants on the R&D investment: A non-stationary panel data approach. (2016). Kao, Chihwa ; Álvarez, Inmaculada ; Alvarez, Inmaculada C ; Romero-Jordan, Desiderio.
    In: Efficiency Series Papers.
    RePEc:oeg:wpaper:2016/04.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. The impact of public support on firm propensity to engage in R&D: Spanish experience. (2016). Huergo, Elena ; Trenado, Mayte ; Ubierna, Andrs .
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:113:y:2016:i:pb:p:206-219.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. University–industry collaboration and firms’ R&D effort. (2016). Scandura, Alessandra.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:45:y:2016:i:9:p:1907-1922.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. The allocation and effectiveness of China’s R&D subsidies - Evidence from listed firms. (2016). Boeing, Philipp.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:45:y:2016:i:9:p:1774-1789.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Additionality or crowding-out? An overall evaluation of public R&D subsidy on private R&D expenditure. (2016). Parrotta, Pierpaolo ; Lhuillery, Stephane ; Sala, Davide ; Marino, Marianna.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:45:y:2016:i:9:p:1715-1730.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Government-subsidized R&D and firm innovation: Evidence from China. (2016). Guo, Di ; Jiang, Kun.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:45:y:2016:i:6:p:1129-1144.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Radical or incremental: Where does R&D policy hit?. (2016). Schenker-Wicki, Andrea ; Lopes-Bento, Cindy ; Beck, Mathias .
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:45:y:2016:i:4:p:869-883.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Bridging science and technology through academic–industry partnerships. (2016). Chai, Sen ; Shih, Willy .
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:45:y:2016:i:1:p:148-158.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Public subsidies for SME research and development: Empirical evaluation of collaborative versus individual place-based programs. (2016). Zazzaro, Alberto ; Pennacchio, Luca ; Bellucci, Andrea.
    In: Mo.Fi.R. Working Papers.
    RePEc:anc:wmofir:133.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Impact Evaluation of the Brazilian crop insurance public program “Proagro Mais”. (2016). BRAVO-URETA, BORIS ; Oate, Carlos Andres ; Ozaki, Vitor Augusto .
    In: 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts.
    RePEc:ags:aaea16:236096.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. R&D subsidies and firms cost of debt. (2015). Hottenrott, Hanna ; Demeulemeester, Sarah.
    In: DICE Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:dicedp:201.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. The Role of Firm RD Effort and Collaboration as Mediating Drivers of Innovation Policy Effectiveness. (2015). POTI, Bianca ; Gabriele, Roberto ; Cerulli, Giovanni.
    In: DEM Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:trn:utwpem:2015/01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. UK and EU subsidies and private R&D investment: Is there input additionality?. (2015). Ugur, Mehmet ; Solomon, Edna ; Trushin, Eshref.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:68009.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Demand-side vs. supply-side technology policies: Hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the policy mix. (2015). Raiteri, Emilio ; Guerzoni, Marco.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:44:y:2015:i:3:p:726-747.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Can R&D subsidies counteract the economic crisis? – Macroeconomic effects in Germany. (2015). Nulsch, Nicole ; Ludwig, Udo ; Brautzsch, Hans-Ulrich ; Loose, Brigitte ; Gunther, Jutta.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:44:y:2015:i:3:p:623-633.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. The impact of R&D subsidies during the crisis. (2015). Hussinger, Katrin ; Hud, Martin.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:44:y:2015:i:10:p:1844-1855.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Radical or incremental: Where does R&D policy hit?. (2014). Schenker-Wicki, Andrea ; Beck, Mathias ; Lopes-Bento, Cindy .
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:14106.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Staging innovation projects: (when) does it pay off?. (2014). Hünermund, Paul ; Hunermund, Paul ; Andries, Petra .
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:14091.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. The impact of R&D subsidies during the crisis. (2014). Hussinger, Katrin ; Hud, Martin.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:14024.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. The Effects of the Government Research and Development Support Policies on the Local Firms Innovative Performance. (2014). Cho, Deokho ; Choi, Kyung Hee.
    In: ERSA conference papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa14p6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. ROMANIA’S R&D AND INNOVATION POTENTIAL AT EU LEVEL AND THE MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS FOR SMEs. (2014). LAVRIC, Victor .
    In: Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE.
    RePEc:rom:mancon:v:8:y:2014:i:1:p:718-726.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. The impact of R&D subsidies on R&D employment composition. (2014). Garcia-Quevedo, Jose ; Afcha, Sergio.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ieb:wpaper:2013/6/doc2014-22.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. The impact of technology intermediaries on firm cognitive capacity additionality. (2014). Spithoven, Andre ; Knockaert, Mirjam ; Clarysse, Bart.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:81:y:2014:i:c:p:376-387.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. (International) R&D collaboration and SMEs: The effectiveness of targeted public R&D support schemes. (2014). Hottenrott, Hanna ; Lopes-Bento, Cindy .
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:43:y:2014:i:6:p:1055-1066.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. A dynamic auction for multi-object procurement under a hard budget constraint. (2014). Giebe, Thomas ; Ensthaler, Ludwig .
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:43:y:2014:i:1:p:179-189.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Crowding-in of complementary contributions to public goods: Firm investment into open source software. (2014). Thomes, Tim ; Ressner, Ludwig ; Schmidtke, Richard ; Reisinger, Markus.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:106:y:2014:i:c:p:78-94.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Absorptive capacity from foreign direct investment in Spanish manufacturing firms. (2014). Rosell-Martinez, Jorge ; Sanchez-Sellero, Pedro ; Garcia-Vazquez, Jose Manuel .
    In: International Business Review.
    RePEc:eee:iburev:v:23:y:2014:i:2:p:429-439.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Evaluation of Public R&D Policy: A Meta-Regression Analysis. (2014). SATTIN, JEAN-FRANCOIS ; Negassi, Syoum .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:dlw:wpaper:14-09..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. (International) R&D collaboration and SMEs: The effectiveness of targeted public R&D support schemes. (2013). Hottenrott, Hanna ; Lopes-Bento, Cindy .
    In: DICE Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:dicedp:121.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Does Government Support for Private Innovation Matter? Firm-Level Evidence from Turkey and Poland. (2013). Tandoğan, Vedat ; Szczygielski, Krzysztof ; Pamukçu, Mehmet ; Grabowski, Wojciech ; Pamukcu, Teoman ; Tandogan, Sinan .
    In: CASE Network Studies and Analyses.
    RePEc:sec:cnstan:0458.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. THE DYNAMICS OF R&D HUMAN RESOURCES IN ROMANIA WITHIN THE EUROPEAN CONTEXT. (2013). LAVRIC, Victor .
    In: Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE.
    RePEc:rom:mancon:v:7:y:2013:i:1:p:259-267.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. HIGHLY IMPORTANT OBJECTIVES FOR INNOVATION IN ROMANIA WITHIN THE EUROPEAN CONTEXT. (2013). Victor, Lavric ; Ion, Popa .
    In: Annals of Faculty of Economics.
    RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2013:i:1:p:1588-1594.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. The Determinants of R&D Investment: A Survey of the Empirical Research. (2013). Becker, Bettina.
    In: Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:lbo:lbowps:2013_09.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Innovation panel surveys in Germany. (2013). Peters, Bettina ; Rammer, Christian.
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:14427_6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Micro-econometric approaches to the evaluation of technology-oriented public programmes: a non-technical review of the state of the art. (2013). Arvanitis, Spyros.
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:14384_3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Value for money? New microeconometric evidence on public R&D grants in Flanders. (2013). Czarnitzki, Dirk ; Lopes-Bento, Cindy .
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:42:y:2013:i:1:p:76-89.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. MANAGERIAL METHODS STIMULATING NEW IDEAS OR CREATIVITY IN ROMANIA WIHIN THE EUROPEAN CONTEXT. (2013). Victor, Lavric ; Ion, Popa .
    In: Revista Economica.
    RePEc:blg:reveco:v:65:y:2013:i:6:p:128-138.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. R&D INCENTIVES: THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A PLACE-BASED POLICY. (2012). Giunta, Anna ; Gabriele, Roberto.
    In: Departmental Working Papers of Economics - University 'Roma Tre'.
    RePEc:rtr:wpaper:0169.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. THE DYNAMICS OF R&D ACTIVITIES IN ROMANIA WITHIN THE EUROPEAN CONTEXT. (2012). LAVRIC, Victor .
    In: Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE.
    RePEc:rom:mancon:v:6:y:2012:i:1:p:648-654.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. (International) R&D Collaboration and SMEs: The effectiveness of targeted public R&D support schemes. (2012). Hottenrott, Hanna ; Cindy, LOPES BENTO .
    In: LISER Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:irs:cepswp:2012-36.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Do financial constraints threat the innovation process? Evidence from Portuguese firms. (2011). Silva, Filipe ; Carreira, Carlos.
    In: GEMF Working Papers.
    RePEc:gmf:wpaper:2011-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Using Innovation Surveys for Econometric Analysis. (2010). Mohnen, Pierre ; MAIRESSE, Jacques.
    In: MERIT Working Papers.
    RePEc:unm:unumer:2010023.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Using Innovations Surveys for Econometric Analysis. (2010). Mohnen, Pierre ; MAIRESSE, Jacques.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:15857.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Government R&D subsidies as a signal for private investors. (2010). Kleer, Robin .
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:39:y:2010:i:10:p:1361-1374.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Using Innovation Surveys for Econometric Analysis. (2010). Mairesse, Jacques ; Mohnen, Pierre.
    In: Handbook of the Economics of Innovation.
    RePEc:eee:haechp:v2_1129.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-28 23:17:31 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.