Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
On publication, refereeing and working hard. (2018). Popov, Sergey ; Baghestanian, Sascha.
In: Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique.
RePEc:wly:canjec:v:51:y:2018:i:4:p:1419-1459.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 5

Citations received by this document

Cites: 32

References cited by this document

Cocites: 44

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. You should reject this paper: Dynamic agency, sequential evaluation, and learning in academic publishing. (2024). Lawson, Nicholas.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:217:y:2024:i:c:p:112-140.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Inconsistent quality signals: evidence from the regional journals. (2023). Yudkevich, Maria ; Veretennik, Elena.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:128:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s11192-023-04723-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. What citation tests really tell us about bias in academic publishing. (2023). Lawson, Nicholas.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:158:y:2023:i:c:s0014292123001630.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Tactical Refereeing and Signaling by Publishing. (2022). Popov, Sergey.
    In: Cardiff Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:cdf:wpaper:2022/14.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Social connections and editorship in economics. (2020). Miniaci, Raffaele ; Pezzoni, Michele.
    In: Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique.
    RePEc:wly:canjec:v:53:y:2020:i:3:p:1292-1317.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Atal, V. (2010) “Do journals accept too many papers?,” Economics Letters 107(2), 229–32.

  2. Azar, O. H. (2005) “The review process in economics: Is it too fast?,” Southern Economic Journal 72(2), 482–91.

  3. Baghestanian, S., and S. V. Popov (2014) “Alma mat(t)er(s): Determinants of early career success in economics,” technical report, Goethe University.

  4. Barbos, A. (2014) “Imperfect evaluation in project screening,” Journal of Economics 112(1), 31–46.

  5. Bardhan, P. (2003) “Journal publication in economics: A view from the periphery,” The Economic Journal113(488), F332–F337.

  6. Bergstrom, T. (2001) “Free labor for costly journals?,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(4), 183–98.

  7. Bikard, M., F. Murray, and J. S. Gans (2015) “Exploring trade‐offs in the organization of scientific work: Collaboration and scientific reward,” Management Science 61(7), 1473–95.

  8. Blank, R. M. (1991) “The effects of double‐blind versus single‐blind reviewing: Experimental evidence from The American Economic Review,” The American Economic Review 81(5), 1041–67.

  9. Bornmann, L. (2011) “Scientific peer review,” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 45(1), 197–245.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  10. Card, D., and S. DellaVigna (2013) “Nine facts about top journals in economics,” Journal of Economic Literature 51(1), 144–61.

  11. Caselli, F., T. Cunningham, M. Morelli, and I. M. Barreda (2014) “The incumbency effects of signalling,” Economica 81(323), 397–418.

  12. Chang, J‐J., and C‐C Lai (2001) “Is it worthwhile to pay referees?,” Southern Economic Journal 68(2), 457–63.

  13. Cotton, C. (2013) “Submission fees and response times in academic publishing,” The American Economic Review 103(1), 501–509.

  14. Ellison, G. (2002a) “Evolving standards for academic publishing: A q‐r theory,” Journal of Political Economy 110(5), 994–1034.

  15. Ellison, G. (2002b) “The slowdown of the economics publishing process,” Journal of Political Economy 110(5), 947–93.

  16. Ellison, G. (2011) “Is peer review in decline?,” Economic Inquiry 49(3), 635–57.

  17. Engers, M., and J. S. Gans (1998) “Why referees are not paid (enough),” The American Economic Review88(5), 1341–49.

  18. Fafchamps, M., M. J. Leij, and S. Goyal (2010) “Matching and network effects,” Journal of the European Economic Association 8(1), 203–31.

  19. Grant, D. (2016) “The essential economics of threshold‐based incentives: Theory, estimation, and evidence from the Western States 100,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 130, 180–97.

  20. Hamermesh, D. S. (1994) “Facts and myths about refereeing,” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(1), 153–63.

  21. Hamermesh, D. S. (2013) “Six decades of top economics publishing: Who and how?,” Journal of Economic Literature 51(1), 162–72.

  22. Heintzelman, M., and D. Nocetti (2009) “Where should we submit our manuscript? An analysis of journal submission strategies,” The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 9(1), 1–26.

  23. Laband, D. N. (1990) “Is there value‐added from the review process in economics? Preliminary evidence from authors,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 105(2), 341–52.

  24. Laband, D. N., and M. J. Piette (1994) “A citation analysis of the impact of blinded peer review,” Journal of American Medical Association 272(2), 147–49.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  25. Leslie, D. (2005) “Are delays in academic publishing necessary?,” The American Economic Review 95(1), 407–13.

  26. Müller‐Itten, M. (2016) “Gatekeeping under asymmetric information,” technical report, University of California, Berkeley.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  27. Medoff, M. H. (2003) “Editorial favoritism in economics?,” Southern Economic Journal 70(2), 425–34.

  28. Oster, S. M. (1980) “The optimal order for submitting manuscripts,” The American Economic Review 70(3), 444–48.

  29. Oster, S. M., and D. S. Hamermesh (1998) “Aging and productivity among economists,” The Review of Economics and Statistics 80(1), 154–56.

  30. Taylor, C. R., and H. Yildirim (2011) “Subjective performance and the value of blind evaluation,” The Review of Economic Studies 78(2), 762–94.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  31. Taylor, C. R., and H. Yildirim (2011) “Subjective performance and the value of blind evaluation,” The Review of Economics and Statistics 80(1), 154–56.

  32. Welch, I. (2014) “Referee recommendations,” Review of Financial Studies 27(8), 1–29.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. The marginalizing effect of journal submission fees in Accounting and Finance. (2023). Armenakyan, Anahit ; Fiset, John ; Oldford, Erin.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:128:y:2023:i:8:d:10.1007_s11192-023-04758-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Optimal pricing and quality of academic journals and the ambiguous welfare effects of forced open access: A two?sided model. (2021). Watt, Richard ; Muellerlanger, Frank.
    In: Managerial and Decision Economics.
    RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:42:y:2021:i:8:p:1945-1959.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help. (2021). , Thomas ; Thomas, ; Yan, Minhua ; Tiokhin, Leonid.
    In: Nature Human Behaviour.
    RePEc:nat:nathum:v:5:y:2021:i:7:d:10.1038_s41562-020-01040-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Begutachtungsverfahren nach Zahl, Gewichtung und Fehlern der Gutachten. (2019). Dilger, Alexander.
    In: Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics.
    RePEc:zbw:umiodp:22019.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. On publication, refereeing and working hard. (2018). Popov, Sergey ; Baghestanian, Sascha.
    In: Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique.
    RePEc:wly:canjec:v:51:y:2018:i:4:p:1419-1459.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Academic Research and the Strategic Interaction of Scholars and Editors: A Two-Stage Game. (2017). Faria, Joao ; Besancenot, Damien ; Mixon, Franklin G.
    In: International Game Theory Review (IGTR).
    RePEc:wsi:igtrxx:v:19:y:2017:i:01:n:s0219198916500109.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Priority criteria in peer review of scientific articles. (2016). Dekanski, Aleksandar ; Nedi, Olgica.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:107:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-016-1869-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. When do referees shirk in a peer review process?. (2016). Roy Chowdhury, Sahana ; Roychowdhury, Sahana .
    In: Economics and Business Letters.
    RePEc:ove:journl:aid:11163.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Social network structure and government provision crowding-out on voluntary contributions. (2016). Chih, Yao-Yu.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:63:y:2016:i:c:p:83-90.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Academic Publication Uncertainty and Publishing Behavior: A Game-Theoretic Perspective. (2016). Goel, Rajeev ; Faria, Joo Ricardo.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_6176.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. SUBMISSION DEMAND IN CORE ECONOMICS JOURNALS: A PANEL STUDY. (2016). Zheng, Yuqing ; Kaiser, Harry M.
    In: Economic Inquiry.
    RePEc:bla:ecinqu:v:54:y:2016:i:2:p:1319-1338.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. What drives the relevance and reputation of economics journals? An update from a survey among economists. (2015). Muck, Johannes ; Haucap, Justus.
    In: Scientometrics.
    RePEc:spr:scient:v:103:y:2015:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-015-1542-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Which factors drive the decision to opt out of individual research rankings? An empirical study of academic resistance to change. (2015). Haucap, Justus ; Berlemann, Michael.
    In: Research Policy.
    RePEc:eee:respol:v:44:y:2015:i:5:p:1108-1115.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. On Publication, Refereeing, and Working Hard. (2014). Popov, Sergey ; Baghestanian, Sascha .
    In: Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:qub:wpaper:1404.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. On Publication, Refereeing and Working Hard. (2014). Popov, Sergey ; Baghestanian, Sascha.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:58539.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. On the marketization of the academic review process. (VF) Sur la marchandisation du processus de referee des revues académiques. (2014). de Mesnard, Louis.
    In: Working Papers CREGO.
    RePEc:dij:wpfarg:1141001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Congestion of Academic Journals Under Papers’ Imperfect Selection. (2014). Faria, Joao ; Besancenot, Damien ; Damien, Besancenot ; Kim, Huynh ; Faria João R., .
    In: The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy.
    RePEc:bpj:bejeap:v:14:y:2014:i:3:p:23:n:14.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. What drives the relevance and reputation of economics journals? An update from a survey among economists. (2013). Muck, Johannes ; Haucap, Justus.
    In: DICE Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:dicedp:103.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Which factors drive the decision to boycott and opt out of research rankings? A note. (2012). Haucap, Justus ; Berlemann, Michael.
    In: DICE Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:dicedp:72.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Search and research: the influence of editorial boards on journals’ quality. (2012). Faria, Joao ; Besancenot, Damien ; Huynh, Kim.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:73:y:2012:i:4:p:687-702.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Which Factors Drive the Decision to Boycott and Opt Out of Research Rankings?. (2012). Haucap, Justus ; Berlemann, Michael.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_3997.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. A Matching Model of the Academic Publication Market. (2011). Vranceanu, Radu ; Besancenot, Damien ; Huynh, Kim.
    In: Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE).
    RePEc:mhr:jinste:urn:sici:0932-4569(201112)167:4_708:ammota_2.0.tx_2-h.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. A Matching Model of the Academic Publication Market. (2011). Vranceanu, Radu ; Huynh, Kim.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-00589186.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. A Matching Model of the Academic Publication Market. (2011). Vranceanu, Radu ; Huynh, Kim ; Besancenot, Damien.
    In: ESSEC Working Papers.
    RePEc:ebg:essewp:dr-11004.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. The Economic History of the American Economic Review : A Centurys Explosion of Economics Research. (2011). Margo, Robert.
    In: American Economic Review.
    RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:101:y:2011:i:1:p:9-35.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. The Economic History of the American Economic Review : A Centurys Explosion of Economics Research. (2010). Margo, Robert.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:16274.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. The Economic History of the American Economic Review: A Century’s Explosion of Economics Research. (2010). Margo, Robert.
    In: Boston University - Department of Economics - Working Papers Series.
    RePEc:bos:wpaper:wp2010-027.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. The ‘Read or Write’ Dilemma in Academic Production: A Transatlantic Perspective. (2009). Vranceanu, Radu ; Besancenot, Damien ; Huynh, Kim.
    In: The American Economist.
    RePEc:sae:amerec:v:53:y:2009:i:1:p:75-84.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Congestion in academic journals under an impartial selection process. (2009). Faria, Joao ; Huynh, Kim.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-00382585.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Publishing in accounting journals: A fair game?. (2009). Moizer, Peter.
    In: Accounting, Organizations and Society.
    RePEc:eee:aosoci:v:34:y:2009:i:2:p:285-304.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Where Should we Submit our Manuscript? An Analysis of Journal Submission Strategies. (2009). Nocetti, Diego ; Heintzelman, Martin.
    In: The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy.
    RePEc:bpj:bejeap:v:9:y:2009:i:1:n:39.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. An Application Game with Fees and Time Costs. (2008). Cotton, Christopher.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:mia:wpaper:0904.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Can incentives for research harm research? A business schools tale. (2008). Vranceanu, Radu ; Besancenot, Damien.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:37:y:2008:i:3:p:1248-1265.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Evolution of social norms with heterogeneous preferences: A general model and an application to the academic review process. (2008). Azar, Ofer.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:65:y:2008:i:3-4:p:420-435.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Concentration in Publishing at Top†Tier Business Journals: Evidence and Potential Explanations*. (2007). Zardkoohi, Asghar ; Wolfe, Christopher J ; Swanson, Edward P.
    In: Contemporary Accounting Research.
    RePEc:wly:coacre:v:24:y:2007:i:4:p:1255-1289.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Is Peer Review in Decline?. (2007). Ellison, Glenn.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:13272.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Behavioral economics and socio-economics journals: A citation-based ranking. (2007). Azar, Ofer.
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:36:y:2007:i:3:p:451-462.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Evolution of Social Norms with Heterogeneous Preferences: A General Model and an Application to the Academic Review Process. (2006). Azar, Ofer.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bgu:wpaper:0602.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. The Academic Review Process: How Can We Make it More Efficient?. (2005). Azar, Ofer.
    In: General Economics and Teaching.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpgt:0502069.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Besonderheiten und Wettbewerbsprobleme des Marktes für wissenschaftliche Fachzeitschriften. (2005). Uhde, Andre ; Haucap, Justus ; Hartwich, Tobias.
    In: Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research.
    RePEc:diw:diwvjh:74-3-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Rejections and the Importance of First Response Times (Or: How Many Rejections Do Others Receive?). (2003). Azar, Ofer.
    In: General Economics and Teaching.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpgt:0309002.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Evolution of social norms with heterogeneous preferences: A general model and an application to the academic review process. (2002). Azar, Ofer.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:4482.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. The slowdown in first-response times of economics journals: Can it be beneficial?. (2002). Azar, Ofer.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:4478.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-04 13:36:09 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.