Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Do mutual fund networks affect corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China. (2020). Qi, Lujun ; Li, Wei'An ; Wang, Lixiang.
In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
RePEc:wly:corsem:v:27:y:2020:i:2:p:1040-1050.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 8

Citations received by this document

Cites: 55

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Which institutional investors drive corporate sustainability? A systematic literature review. (2023). Velte, Patrick.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:32:y:2023:i:1:p:42-71.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. How do co?shareholding networks affect negative media coverage? Evidence from China. (2023). Liu, Yupei ; Hou, Wendi ; Wang, Lixiang.
    In: Accounting and Finance.
    RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:63:y:2023:i:4:p:4221-4249.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Investor behavior and the demand for conventional and socially responsible mutual funds. (2022). de Mingolopez, Diego Victor ; Navarromontoliu, Salvador ; Solerdominguez, Amparo ; Matallinsaez, Juan Carlos ; Juan Carlos Matallin Saez, .
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:29:y:2022:i:1:p:46-59.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Does entrepreneurs’ proactive attention to government policies matter?. (2022). Dong, Jincai ; Lin, Qiao ; Liao, Mingqing ; Dai, Weiqi.
    In: Asian Business & Management.
    RePEc:pal:abaman:v:21:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1057_s41291-020-00130-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Analysis of the Impact of the COVID-19 Crisis on the Hungarian Employees. (2022). Antalik, Imrich ; Krupanszki, Kornel ; Karacsony, Peter.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:1990-:d:745926.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Framing the evolution of the corporate social responsibility and environmental management journal. (2021). Meng, Fanchen ; Raza, Ali ; Farrukh, Muhammad ; Wu, Yihua ; Alam, Imtiaz.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:28:y:2021:i:4:p:1397-1411.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Aerts, W., Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2006). Intra‐industry imitation in corporate environmental reporting: An international perspective. Journal of Accounting & Public Policy, 25(3), 299–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2006.03.004.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  2. Ali, W., Frynas, J. G., & Mahmood, Z. (2017). Determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in developed and developing countries: A literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(4), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1410.

  3. Arena, C., Bozzolan, S., & Michelon, G. (2015). Environmental reporting: Transparency to stakeholders or stakeholder manipulation? An analysis of disclosure tone and the role of the board of directors. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(6), 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1350.

  4. Barnea, A., Heinkel, R., & Kraus, A. (2005). Green investors and corporate investment. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 16(3), 332–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2004.04.002.

  5. Becker, S. O., & Ichino, A. (2002). Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. The Stata Journal, 2(4), 358–377. https://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=st0026.

  6. Beddewela, E., & Fairbrass, J. (2016). Seeking legitimacy through CSR: Institutional pressures and corporate responses of multinationals in Sri Lanka. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(3), 503–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2478-z.

  7. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  8. Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x.

  9. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three‐dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1979.4498296.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  10. Chen, X. H., & Lai, Y. J. (2015). On the concentration of mutual fund portfolio holdings: Evidence from Taiwan. Research in International Business and Finance, 33, 268–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2014.10.004.

  11. Chen, Y. S., Lai, S. B., & Wen, C. T. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9025-5.

  12. Cohen, L., Frazzini, A., & Malloy, C. (2010). Sell‐side school ties. The Journal of Finance, 65(4), 1409–1437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01574.x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  13. Cox, P., & Wicks, P. G. (2011). Institutional interest in corporate responsibility: Portfolio evidence and ethical explanation. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(1), 143–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0859-0.

  14. Cox, P., Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2004). An empirical examination of institutional investor preferences for corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033105.77051.9d.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  15. Cremers, K. J. M., & Nair, V. B. (2005). Governance mechanisms and equity prices. The Journal of Finance, 60(6), 2859–2894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00819.x.

  16. Davis, G. F., Yoo, M., & Baker, W. E. (2003). The small world of the American corporate elite, 1982‐2001. Strategic organization, 1(3), 301–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270030013002.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Degli Antoni, G., & Sacconi, L. (2013). Social responsibility, activism and boycotting in a firm–stakeholders network of games with players' conformist preferences. The Journal of Socio‐Economics, 45, 216–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2013.05.016.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Di Norcia, V., & Larkins, J. T. (2000). Mixed motives and ethical decisions in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006053706207.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  19. Fracassi, C. (2017). Corporate finance policies and social networks. Management Science, 63(8), 2420–2438. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2433.

  20. Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social networks, 1(3), 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  21. García‐Meca, E., & Pucheta‐Martínez, M. C. (2018). How institutional investors on boards impact on stakeholder engagement and corporate social responsibility reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(3), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1451.

  22. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. (1994). Institutional owners and corporate social performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1034–1046. https://doi.org/10.5465/256611.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  24. Heinkel, R., Kraus, A., & Zechner, J. (2001). The effect of green investment on corporate behavior. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36(4), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.2307/2676219.

  25. Hochberg, Y. V., Ljungqvist, A., & Lu, Y. (2007). Whom you know matters: Venture capital networks and investment performance. The Journal of Finance, 62(1), 251–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01207.x.

  26. Hong, H., & Kacperczyk, M. (2009). The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(1), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.09.001.

  27. Humphery‐Jenner, M. (2012). Private equity fund size, investment size, and value creation. Review of Finance, 16(3), 799–835. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfr011.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564–576. https://doi.org/10.5465/256977.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Kim, Y., Park, M. S., & Wier, B. (2012). Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility. The Accounting Review, 87(3), 761–796. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10209.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  30. Klein, B., Crawford, R. G., & Alchian, A. A. (1978). Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. The Journal of Law and Economics, 21(2), 297–326. https://doi.org/10.1086/466922.

  31. Lamb, N. H., & Butler, F. C. (2018). The influence of family firms and institutional owners on corporate social responsibility performance. Business & Society, 57(7), 1374–1406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316648443.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  32. Li, Q., Li, T., Chen, H., Xiang, E., & Ruan, W. (2019). Executives' excess compensation, legitimacy, and environmental information disclosure in Chinese heavily polluting companies: The moderating role of media pressure. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 248–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1676.

  33. Li, W., Xu, J., & Zheng, M. (2018). Green governance: New perspective from open innovation. Sustainability, 10(11), 3845–3864. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113845.

  34. Luo, Y., & Chen, M. (1997). Does guanxi influence firm performance? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015401928005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  35. Martin, P. R., & Moser, D. V. (2016). Managers' green investment disclosures and investors' reaction. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(1), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.08.004.

  36. Mishra, S., & Suar, D. (2010). Does corporate social responsibility influence firm performance of Indian companies? Journal of Business Ethics, 95(4), 571–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0441-1.

  37. Muller, A., & Kolk, A. (2010). Extrinsic and intrinsic drivers of corporate social performance: Evidence from foreign and domestic firms in Mexico. Journal of Management Studies, 47(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00855.x.

  38. Neubaum, D. O., & Zahra, S. A. (2006). Institutional ownership and corporate social performance: The moderating effects of investment horizon, activism, and coordination. Journal of Management, 32(1), 108–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305277797.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  39. Ozsoylev, H. N., Walden, J., Yavuz, M. D., & Bildik, R. (2014). Investor networks in the stock market. Review of Financial Studies, 27(5), 1323–1366. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hht065.

  40. Pareek A. (2012). Information networks: Implications for mutual fund trading behavior and stock returns. AFA 2010 Atlanta Meetings Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1361779.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  41. Petersen, H. L., & Vredenburg, H. (2009). Morals or economics? Institutional investor preferences for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0030-3.

  42. Pool, V. K., Stoffman, N., & Yonker, S. E. (2015). The people in your neighborhood: Social interactions and mutual fund portfolios. The Journal of Finance, 70(6), 2679–2732. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12208.

  43. Press, J. (2008). China stock market handbook. Saratoga, NY: Javvin Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Pucheta‐Martínez, M. C., & López‐Zamora, B. (2018). Engagement of directors representing institutional investors on environmental disclosure. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(6), 1108–1120. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1525.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). Assessing sensitivity to an unobserved binary covariate in an observational study with binary outcome. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 45(2), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1983.tb01242.x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887–910. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022107.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5), 688–701. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037350.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  48. Smith, J. A., & Todd, P. E. (2005). Does matching overcome LaLonde's critique of nonexperimental estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 125(1), 305–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.011.

  49. Solis, R. (2009). Visualizing stock‐mutual fund relationships through social network analysis. Global Journal of Finance and Banking Issues, 3(3), 8–22. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1536157.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  50. Teng, M. J., & Wu, S. Y. (2018). Sustainable development and competitive advantages—Utilizing matching to overcome sample selection bias. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25, 313–326. https://doi, https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1462.

  51. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Wen, S. (2009). Institutional investor activism on socially responsible investment: Effects and expectations. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(3), 308–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2009.01565.x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  53. White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity‐consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817–838. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912934.

  54. Wooldridge, J. M. (2015). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Toronto, ON: Nelson Education.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Yu, T., & Lester, R. H. (2008). Moving beyond firm boundaries: A social network perspective on reputation spillover. Corporate Reputation Review, 11(1), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2008.6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Environmental, social and governance, corporate social responsibility, and stock returns: What are the short? and long?Run relationships?. (2022). Chang, Chunping ; Wang, Haijie ; Long, Han ; Feng, Genfu.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:29:y:2022:i:5:p:1884-1895.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Theoretical Insights of CSR Research in Communication from 1980 to 2018: A Bibliometric Network Analysis. (2022). Rim, Hyejoon ; Tao, Weiting ; Ji, Yi Grace.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:177:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-021-04748-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. The application of corporate social responsibility (CSR) actions for mitigation of environmental, social, corporate governance (ESG) and reputational risk in integrated reports. (2021). Raulinajtysgrzybek, Monika ; Karwowski, Mariusz.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:28:y:2021:i:4:p:1270-1284.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Modelling the impact of corporate reputation on customers behaviour. (2021). Balan, Dragos Alexandru ; Burleaschiopoiu, Adriana.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:28:y:2021:i:3:p:1142-1156.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Does corporate governance matter in corporate social responsibility disclosure? Evidence from Italy in the “era of sustainability”. (2021). Medioli, Alice ; Furlotti, Katia ; Marchini, Pier Luigi ; Tibiletti, Veronica.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:28:y:2021:i:2:p:896-907.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Social and environmental reporting, sustainable development and institutional voids: Evidence from a developing country. (2021). Moustafa, Maha W ; Elamer, Ahmed A ; Alshbili, Ibrahem.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:28:y:2021:i:2:p:881-895.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Transparency of materiality analysis in GRI?based sustainability reports. (2021). Fonseca, Alberto ; Pinto, Livia Cristina ; Almeida, Bianca Alves.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:28:y:2021:i:2:p:570-580.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Religious social norms and corporate sustainability: The effect of religiosity on environmental, social, and governance disclosure. (2021). Turzo, Teresa ; Terzani, Simone.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:28:y:2021:i:1:p:485-496.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. CSR reporting by Chinese and Western MNEs: patterns combining formal homogenization and substantive differences. (2021). Ervits, Irina.
    In: International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility.
    RePEc:spr:ijocsr:v:6:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1186_s40991-021-00060-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Board Structure and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence From Developing Economy. (2021). Nwude, Comfort Amaka.
    In: SAGE Open.
    RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:2158244020988543.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Disclosure of integrated reporting elements by industrial companies: evidence from Jordan. (2021). Mansor, Noorhayati ; al Amosh, Hamzeh.
    In: Journal of Management & Governance.
    RePEc:kap:jmgtgv:v:25:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10997-020-09541-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. How Do Companies Respond to Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) ratings? Evidence from Italy. (2021). Perkins, Richard ; Clementino, Ester.
    In: Journal of Business Ethics.
    RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:171:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-020-04441-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Corporate Social Responsibility Management. (2021). Abulkhanova, Guzel Azatovna ; Chumarina, Gulnara Raisovna.
    In: International Journal of Financial Research.
    RePEc:jfr:ijfr11:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:270-278.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Economic development and CSR assurance: Important drivers for carbon reporting… yet inefficient drivers for carbon management?. (2021). Merello, Paloma ; Zorio-Grima, Ana ; Roman, Carmen Cordova.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:163:y:2021:i:c:s0040162520312506.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Corporate controversies and companys financial performance: Exploring the moderating role of ESG practices. (2021). Quaglia, Roberto ; Miglietta, Nicola ; Santoro, Gabriele ; Nirino, Niccolo.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:162:y:2021:i:c:s0040162520311677.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. CSR disclosure of foreign versus U.S. firms: Evidence from ADRs. (2021). Lin, Nanying ; Huang, Qiping ; Fu, Chengbo ; Chowdhury, Reza H.
    In: Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money.
    RePEc:eee:intfin:v:70:y:2021:i:c:s1042443120301591.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Environmental sustainability practices and offshoring activities of multinational corporations across emerging and developed markets. (2021). Tarba, Shlomo Y ; Khan, Zaheer ; Adomako, Samuel ; Danso, Albert ; Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph ; Lartey, Theophilus A.
    In: International Business Review.
    RePEc:eee:iburev:v:30:y:2021:i:5:s0969593120301438.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. CSR achievement, reporting, and assurance in the energy sector: Does economic development matter?. (2021). Shahbaz, Muhammad ; Uyar, Ali ; Orazalin, Nurlan ; Karaman, Abdullah S.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:149:y:2021:i:c:s0301421520307187.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Corporate social responsibility in emerging market economies: Determinants, consequences, and future research directions. (2021). Wang, HE ; Guedhami, Omrane ; el Ghoul, Sadok ; Boubakri, Narjess.
    In: Emerging Markets Review.
    RePEc:eee:ememar:v:46:y:2021:i:c:s1566014120303307.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. The institutional analysis of CSR: Learnings from an emerging country. (2021). Bathurst, Ralph ; Lockhart, James ; Khan, Majid.
    In: Emerging Markets Review.
    RePEc:eee:ememar:v:46:y:2021:i:c:s1566014120300959.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Corporate social responsibility: Trends in global reporting initiative standards. (2021). HALKOS, GEORGE ; Nomikos, Stylianos.
    In: Economic Analysis and Policy.
    RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:69:y:2021:i:c:p:106-117.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. INFLUENCE OF NATIONAL CULTURE ON CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY. (2021). Margarete, Maria ; Klann, Roberto Carlos ; Da, Mikaeli ; Soschinski, Caroline K.
    In: CrossCultural Management Journal.
    RePEc:cmj:journl:y:2021:i:1:p:71-88.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Biodiversity and extinction accounting for sustainable development: A systematic literature review and future research directions. (2021). Nandy, Monomita ; Elamer, Ahmed ; Hassan, Abeer ; Roberts, Lee.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:30:y:2021:i:1:p:705-720.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Factors affecting corporate environmental disclosure in emerging markets: The role of corporate governance structures. (2021). Gerged, Ali Meftah.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:30:y:2021:i:1:p:609-629.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Analysis of corporate social disclosures of the apparel industry following crisis: an institutional approach. (2021). Deegan, Craig ; Akbar, Suraiyah.
    In: Accounting and Finance.
    RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:61:y:2021:i:2:p:3565-3600.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. The impact of the amount of environmental information disclosure on financial performance: The moderating effect of corporate internationalization. (2020). Li, Ying ; Yao, Congxu ; Yang, YI.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:27:y:2020:i:6:p:2893-2907.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Corporate social responsibility and brand passion among consumers: Theory and evidence. (2020). Zhang, NA ; Gong, Zhenxing ; Gilal, Rukhsana Gul ; Channa, Nisar Ahmed.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:27:y:2020:i:5:p:2275-2285.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Environmental disclosure and stakeholder engagement via social media: State of the art and potential in public utilities. (2020). Giacomini, Davide ; Mazzoleni, Mario ; Paredi, Diego ; Zola, Paola.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:27:y:2020:i:4:p:1552-1564.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Board interlocks and the diffusion of CSR reporting practices: The role of market development. (2020). Sun, Weizhang ; Zhang, Yifei ; Yang, Jinfeng ; Geng, Yanli ; Li, Xuan.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:27:y:2020:i:3:p:1333-1343.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. The moderating effects of employee corporate social responsibility motive attributions (substantive and symbolic) between corporate social responsibility perceptions and voluntary pro‐environmental . (2020). Afsar, Bilal ; Umrani, Waheed Ali ; Ur, Zia ; Alghazali, Basheer M.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:27:y:2020:i:2:p:769-785.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Impact of environmental policy on firms market performance: The case of ISO 14001. (2020). Riaz, Hammad ; Saeed, Abubakr.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:27:y:2020:i:2:p:681-693.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Corporate social responsibility practices incomes and outcomes: Stakeholders pressure, culture, employee commitment, corporate reputation, and brand performance. A Polish–German cross‐country stud. (2020). Kucharska, Wioleta ; Kowalczyk, Rafa.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:27:y:2020:i:2:p:595-615.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Social trust and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China. (2020). Chen, Xiangyu ; Wan, Peng.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:27:y:2020:i:2:p:485-500.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Do mutual fund networks affect corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China. (2020). Qi, Lujun ; Li, Wei'An ; Wang, Lixiang.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:27:y:2020:i:2:p:1040-1050.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Corporate social responsibility and earnings management: The moderating effect of corporate governance mechanisms. (2020). Buertey, Samuel ; Hwang, Juhee ; Lee, Jang Soon ; Sun, Eunjung.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:27:y:2020:i:1:p:256-271.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Restrictive and Supportive Mechanisms for Female Directors’ Risk-Averse Behavior: Evidence From South Asian Health Care Industry. (2020). Hashmi, Muhammad Sadiq ; Ahmed, Ammar ; Abbas, Ghulam ; Yahya, Farzan.
    In: SAGE Open.
    RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:2158244020962777.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure on the Future Earnings Response Coefficient (ASEAN Banking Analysis). (2020). Daniel, ; Trireksani, Terri.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:22:p:9671-:d:447908.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Does religion benefit corporate social responsibility (CSR)? Evidence from China. (2019). Su, Kun.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:26:y:2019:i:6:p:1206-1221.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Assessing the determinants of performance in the recycling business: Evidence from the Italian context. (2019). Franceschelli, Maria Vittoria ; Quaglia, Roberto ; Giacosa, Elisa ; Santoro, Gabriele.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:26:y:2019:i:5:p:1086-1099.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. An international approach of the relationship between board attributes and the disclosure of corporate social responsibility issues. (2019). Maria Consuelo Pucheta Martinez, ; Gallegoalvarez, Isabel ; Puchetamartinez, Maria Consuelo.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:26:y:2019:i:3:p:612-627.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Business contribution to the Sustainable Development Agenda: Organizational factors related to early adoption of SDG reporting. (2019). Rosati, Francesco ; Diniz, Loureno Galvo.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:26:y:2019:i:3:p:588-597.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Effect of corporate social responsibility disclosure on firms sales performance: A perspective of stakeholder engagement and theory. (2019). Waheed, Abdul ; Yang, Jianhua.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:26:y:2019:i:3:p:559-566.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. The importance of official certifications in globalized companies performance: An empirical approach to the shipbuilding industry. (2019). Paragonzalez, Lorena ; Mascaraqueramirez, Carlos.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:26:y:2019:i:2:p:408-415.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Reversing the lens: Why corporate social responsibility is not community development. (2019). McLennan, Sharon ; Banks, Glenn.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:26:y:2019:i:1:p:117-126.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. The content and determinants of greenhouse gas emission disclosure: Evidence from Indonesian companies. (2018). Faisal, Faisal ; Meiranto, Wahyu ; Haryanto, Haryanto ; Achmad, Tarmizi ; Andiningtyas, Erika Dwi.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:25:y:2018:i:6:p:1397-1406.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. CSR and green economy: Determinants and correlation of firms’ sustainable development. (2018). MONEVA, JOSE ; Scarpellini, Sabina ; Marcofondevila, Miguel.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:25:y:2018:i:5:p:756-771.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Does gender diversity in the audit committee influence key audit matters readability in the audit report? UK evidence. (2018). Velte, Patrick.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:25:y:2018:i:5:p:748-755.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Stakeholder Engagement for Corporate Sustainability: A Comparative Analysis of B2C and B2B Companies. (2018). Johnson, Matthew ; Schaltegger, Stefan ; Redlbacher, Friederike.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:25:y:2018:i:4:p:659-673.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Corporate social responsibility in Bolivia: meanings and consequences. (2018). Tavera, Carlos Arandia ; Frank, Bjorn ; Torrico, Boris Herbas.
    In: International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility.
    RePEc:spr:ijocsr:v:3:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1186_s40991-018-0029-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Environmental rating of oil and gas companies in Russia: How assessment affects environmental transparency and performance. (2018). Pakhalov, A ; Shvarts, E ; Ametistova, L ; Knizhnikov, A.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:27:y:2018:i:7:p:1023-1038.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-02-12 10:11:43 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.