Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Contracting Probability Distortions. (2019). Gonzalez-Jimenez, Victor H.
In: Vienna Economics Papers.
RePEc:vie:viennp:vie1901.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 61

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Against the Odds! The Tradeoff Between Risk and Incentives is Alive and Well. (2023). Corgnet, Brice ; Zylbersztejn, Adam ; Kpegli, Yao Thibaut ; Hernan-Gonzalez, Roberto.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:gat:wpaper:2305.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abdellaoui, M. (2000). Parameter-Free Elicitation of Utility and Probability Weighting Functions. Management Science, 46(11):1497–1512.

  2. Abdellaoui, M., Baillon, A., Placido, L., and Wakker, P. P. (2011). The Rich Domain of Uncertainty: Source Functions and Their Experimental Implementation. American Economic Review, 101(2):695–723.

  3. Abeler, J., Falk, A., Goette, L., and Huffman, D. (2011). Reference Points and Effort Provision. American Economic Review, 101(2):470–492.

  4. Ashraf, N., Bandiera, O., and Lee, S. S. (2014). Awards unbundled: Evidence from a natural field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 100:44–63.

  5. Azrieli, Y., Chambers, C., and Healy, P. J. (2018). Incentives in experiments: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 126(4):1472–1503.

  6. Bandiera, O., Barankay, I., and Rasul, I. (2013). Team Incentives: Evidence From a Firm Level Experiment. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(5):1079–1114.

  7. Berns, G. S., Capra, M. C., Chappelow, J., Moore, S., and Noussair, C. N. (2008). Nonlinear Neurobiological Probability Weighting Functions For Aversive Outcomes. Neuroimage, 39(4):2047–2057.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  8. Blanco, M., Koch, A. K., Engelmann, D., and Normann, H.-T. (2010). Belief Elicitation in Experiments: Is there a Hedging Problem ? Experimental Economics, 13(4):412–438.

  9. Bleichrodt, H. and Pinto, L. (2000). A Parameter-Free Elicitation of the Probability Weighting Function in Medical Decision Analysis. Management Science, 46(11):1485–1496.

  10. Bruhin, A., Fehr-Duda, H., and Epper, T. (2010). Risk and Rationality: Uncovering Heterogeneity in Probability Distortion. Econometrica, 78(4):1375–1412.

  11. Buser, T., Niederle, M., and Oosterbeek, H. (2014). Gender, competition and career choices.

  12. Camerer, C. F. and Ho, T.-h. (1994). Violations of the Betweenness Axiom and Nonlinearity in Probability. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, (8):167–196.

  13. Charness, G. and Kuhn, P. (2011). Lab labor: What can labor economists learn from the lab? Handbook of Labor Economics, 4(Part A):229–330.

  14. Chateauneuf, A., Eichberger, J., and Grant, S. (2007). Choice under Uncertainty with the Best and Worst in Mind: Neo-additive Capacities. Journal of Economic Theory, 137(1):538–567.

  15. Corgnet, B., Gómez-Miñambres, J., and Hernán-Gonzalez, R. (2015). Goal Setting and Monetary Incentives : When Large Stakes Are Not Enough. Management Science, 61(12):2926–2944.

  16. Cubitt, R. P., Starmer, C., and Sugden, R. (1998). On the Validity of the Random Lottery Incentive System. Experimental Economics, 1:115–131.

  17. Dalton, P. S., Ghosal, S., and Mani, A. (2016). Poverty and Aspirations Failure. Economic Journal, 126:165–188.

  18. DellaVigna, S. and Malmendier, U. (2004). Contract Design and Self-Control: Theory and Evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(May):353–402.

  19. Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., and Sunde, U. (2012). The intergenerational transmission of risk and trust attitudes. Review of Economic Studies, 79(November 2011):645–677.

  20. Etchart-Vincent, N. (2004). Is Probability Weighting Sensitive to the Magnitude of Consequences? An Experimental Investigation on Losses. The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 28(3):217–235.

  21. Falk, A. and Ichino, A. (2006). Clean Evidence on Peer Effects. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(1):39–57.

  22. Fehr-duda, H. (2012). Probability and Risk : Foundations and Economic Implications of Probability-Dependent Risk Preferences. Annual Review of Economics, 4(1):567–593.

  23. Fehr, E., Klein, A., and Schmidt, K. M. (2007). Fairness and Contract Design. Econometrica, 75(1):121–154.

  24. Fischbacher, U. (2007). Z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2):171–178.

  25. Gómez-Miñambres, J. (2012). Motivation through goal setting. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(6):1223–1239.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  26. Gibbons, R. (1987). Piece-Rate Incentive Schemes. Journal of Labor Economics, 5(4):413–429.

  27. Gibbons, R. and Roberts, J. (2013). The Handbook of Organizational Economics. Number 3. Princeton Unversity Press, Princeton.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  28. Goette, L., Huffman, D., and Fehr, E. (2004). Loss aversion and labor supply. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(2-3):216–228.

  29. Goldstein, W. and Einhorn, H. (1987). Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena. Psychological Review, 94(2):236.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Gonzalez, R. and Wu, G. (1999). On the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function a. Cognitive Psychology, 166:129–166.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  31. Haridon, O., Aycinena, D., Vieider, F. M., Belianin, A., and Bandur, A. (2018). Off the Charts : Massive Unexplained Heterogeneity in a Global Study of Ambiguity Attitudes. Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(4):664–677.

  32. Hau, R. and Pleskac, T. J. (2008). The Description-Experience Gap in Risky Choice : The Role of Sample Size and Experienced Probabilities. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21:493–518.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Heath, C., Larrick, R. P., and Wu, G. (1999). Goals as reference points. Cognitive psychology, 38(1):79–109.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Heidhues, B. P. and Koszegi, B. (2010). Exploiting Naïvete about Self-Control in the Credit Market. The American Economic Review, 100(5):2279–2303.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E. U., and Erev, I. (2004). Decisions From Experience and the Effect of Rare Events in Risky Choice. Psychological Science, 15(8):534–539.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  36. Herweg, F. and Mueller, D. (2010). Binary payment schemes: Moral hazard and loss aversion.

  37. Hey, J. D. and Lee, J. (2005). Do subjects separate (or are they sophisticated)? Experimental Economics, 8:233–265.

  38. Holmstrom, B. (1979). Moral hazard and observability. Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1):74–91.

  39. Holmstrom, B. (1999). Managerial Incentive Problems: A Dynamic Perspective. The Review of Economic Studies, 66:169–182.

  40. Holmstrom, B. and Milgrom, P. (1991). Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 7(January 1991):24–52.

  41. Holt, C. (1986). Preference Reversals and the Independence. The American Economic Review, 76(3):508–515.

  42. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., and Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies The Endowment Effect , Loss Aversion , and Status Quo Bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1):193–206.

  43. Koszegi, B. (2014). Behavioral Contract Theory. Journal of Economic Literature, 52:1075–1118.

  44. Koszegi, B. and Rabin, M. (2006). A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4):1133–1165.

  45. Lazear, E. P. (1986). Salaries and Piece Rates. The Journal of Business, 59(3):405.

  46. Moldovanu, B., Sela, A., and Shi, X. (2007). Contests for Status. Journal of Political Economy, 115(2):338–363.

  47. Murphy, R. O. and Ten Brincke, R. H. W. (2018). Hierarchical Maximum Likelihood Parameter Estimation for Cumulative Prospect Theory: Improving the Reliability of Individual Risk Parameter Estimates. Management Science, 64(1):308–326.

  48. Niederle, M. and Vesterlund, L. (2007). Do Women Shy Away From Competition? Do Men Compete Too Much? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3):1067–1101.

  49. Pokorny, K. (2008). Pay-but do not pay too much. An experimental study on the impact of incentives. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 66:251–264.

  50. Prelec, D. (1998). The Probability Weighting Function. Econometrica, 66(3):497–527.

  51. Quiggin, J. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility.

  52. Rabin, M. (2000). Risk Aversion and Expected-Utility theory : A Calibration Theorem.

  53. Sandroni, B. A. and Squintani, F. (2007). Overconfidence , Insurance , and Paternalism. The American Economic Review, 97(5):1994–2004.

  54. Spalt, O. (2013). Probability Weighting and Employee Stock Options. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48(4):1085–1118.

  55. Starmer, C. and Sugden, R. (1991). Does the Random-Lottery Incentive System Elicit True Preferences ? An Experimental Investigation Author. The American Economic Review, 81(4):971–978.

  56. Tversky, A. and Fox, C. R. (1995). Weighing risk and uncertainty. Psychological Review, 102(2):269–283.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  57. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4):297–323.

  58. Wakker, P. and Deneffe, D. (1996). Eliciting von Neumann–Morgenstern Utilities When Probabilities Are Distorted or Unknown. Management Science, 42(8):1131–1150.

  59. Wakker, P. P. (2010). Prospect Theory for Risk and Ambiguity. Cambridge university press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  60. Wu, G. and Gonzalez, R. (1996). Curvature of the Probability Weighting Function. Management Science, 42(12):1676–1690.

  61. Wu, G., Heath, C., and Larrick, R. (2008). A prospect theory model of goal behavior. Mimeo.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Efficiency of the Experimental Prediction Market: Public Information, Belief Evolution, and Personality Traits. (2021). Yang, Chih-Hwa ; Chie, Bin-Tzong.
    In: Advances in Management and Applied Economics.
    RePEc:spt:admaec:v:11:y:2021:i:4:f:11_4_3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Certainty Preference, Random Choice, and Loss Aversion: A Comment on Violence and Risk Preference: Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan. (2016). Vieider, Ferdinand.
    In: Economics & Management Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:rdg:emxxdp:em-dp2016-06.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Heterogeneity in risk attitudes across domains: A bivariate random preference approach. (2015). Moffatt, Peter ; conte, anna ; Riddel, Mary .
    In: Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS).
    RePEc:uea:wcbess:15-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Civil Liability, Knight’s Uncertainty and Non-Dictatorial Regulator. (2015). Mondello, Gerard.
    In: GREDEG Working Papers.
    RePEc:gre:wpaper:2015-47.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Ambiguous Beliefs on Damages and Civil Liability Theories. (2013). Mondello, Gerard.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00929948.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. The ratio bias phenomenon: fact or artifact?. (2011). Villeval, Marie Claire ; Vieider, Ferdinand ; Lefebvre, Mathieu.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:71:y:2011:i:4:p:615-641.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Solving the St. Petersburg Paradox in cumulative prospect theory: the right amount of probability weighting. (2011). pfiffelmann, marie.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:71:y:2011:i:3:p:325-341.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Risk aversion elicitation: reconciling tractability and bias minimization. (2011). L'Haridon, Olivier ; Driouchi, Ahmed ; Abdellaoui, Mohammed ; Lharidon, Olivier.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:71:y:2011:i:1:p:63-80.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Investment in antiviral drugs: a real options approach. (2010). Attema, Arthur ; Lugner, Anna K. ; Feenstra, Talitha L..
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:19:y:2010:i:10:p:1240-1254.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Safety and the Allocation of Costs in Large Accidents. (2010). LANGLAIS, Eric.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:25710.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. The influence of probabilities on the response mode bias in utility elicitation. (2010). Vetschera, Rudolf ; Wakolbinger, Lea ; Schwand, Christopher .
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:69:y:2010:i:3:p:395-416.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Individual fairness in Harsanyi’s utilitarianism: operationalizing all-inclusive utility. (2010). Trautmann, Stefan.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:68:y:2010:i:4:p:405-415.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. On probabilities and loss aversion. (2010). Zank, Horst.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:68:y:2010:i:3:p:243-261.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Stability of risk preferences and the reflection effect of prospect theory. (2010). Baucells, Manel ; Villasis, Antonio .
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:68:y:2010:i:1:p:193-211.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Endowment effects? “Even” with half a million on the table!. (2010). Blavatskyy, Pavlo ; Pogrebna, Ganna.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:68:y:2010:i:1:p:173-192.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Reevaluating evidence on myopic loss aversion: aggregate patterns versus individual choices. (2010). Blavatskyy, Pavlo ; Pogrebna, Ganna.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:68:y:2010:i:1:p:159-171.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Separating curvature and elevation: A parametric probability weighting function. (2010). L'Haridon, Olivier ; Abdellaoui, Mohammed ; Lharidon, Olivier ; Zank, Horst.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:41:y:2010:i:1:p:39-65.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Competence effects for choices involving gains and losses. (2010). Resende, Jose Lara ; Wu, George.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:40:y:2010:i:2:p:109-132.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. An Empirical Analysis of Choices Between Gambles of Children and Adults in China. (2010). Zhang, Jie ; Peel, David ; Paya, Ivan.
    In: Journal of Gambling Business and Economics.
    RePEc:buc:jgbeco:v:4:y:2010:i:1:p:1-18.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Coordination after gains and losses: Is prospect theory’s value function predictive for games?. (2010). Schroeder, Andreas ; Krause, Kai Oliver ; Schade, Christian .
    In: Structural Change in Agriculture/Strukturwandel im Agrarsektor (SiAg) Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:huscpw:59524.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Distinguishing trust from risk: an anatomy of the investment game. (2009). Winter, Joachim ; Schunk, Daniel ; Houser, Daniel.
    In: IEW - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:iewwpx:450.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Preference for Skew in Lotteries: Evidence from the Laboratory. (2009). Santos-Pinto, Luis ; Mata, José ; Astebro, Thomas.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:17165.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Previous outcomes and reference dependence: A meta study of repeated investment tasks with and without restricted feedback. (2009). Hopfensitz, Astrid.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:16096.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Is brain activity observable that leads to an evaluation of a probability of 0.5 that is different from 0.5 in binary lottery choices?. (2009). Vogt, Bodo ; Munte, Thomas ; Morgenstern, Ralf ; Heldmann, Marcus .
    In: FEMM Working Papers.
    RePEc:mag:wpaper:09003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. The influence of fear in decisions: Experimental evidence. (2009). Chichilnisky, Graciela ; CHANEL, Olivier.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:39:y:2009:i:3:p:271-298.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Probability weighting and the ‘level’ and ‘spacing’ of outcomes: An experimental study over losses. (2009). ETCHART-VINCENT, Nathalie.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:39:y:2009:i:1:p:45-63.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Attitudes toward Uncertainty among the Poor: Evidence from Rural Ethiopia. (2009). Trautmann, Stefan ; Martinsson, Peter ; Akay, Alpaslan ; Medhin, Haileselassie .
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp4225.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. The shape of the utility function under risk in the loss domain and the ruinous losses hypothesis: some experimental results. (2009). ETCHART-VINCENT, Nathalie.
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-09-00246.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Eliciting beliefs. (2008). Melkonyan, Tigran ; Chambers, Robert.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:65:y:2008:i:4:p:271-284.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. A Betting Market: Description and a Theoretical Explanation of Bets in Pelota Matches. (2008). Llorente, Loreto ; Aizpurua, Josemari.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:64:y:2008:i:2:p:421-446.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theory. (2008). L'Haridon, Olivier ; Abdellaoui, Mohammed ; Lharidon, Olivier ; Bleichrodt, Han.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:36:y:2008:i:3:p:245-266.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Are the Treasures of Game Theory Ambiguous?. (2008). Kelsey, David ; Eichberger, Jürgen.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:awi:wpaper:0469.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. The Relationship Between Risk Attitudes and Heuristics in Search Tasks: A Laboratory Experiment. (2007). Winter, Joachim ; Schunk, Daniel.
    In: Discussion Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:lmu:muenec:1377.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Insights into Trader Behavior: Risk Aversion and Probability Weighting. (2007). Pennings, Joost ; Garcia, Philip ; Mattos, Fabio ; Pennings, Joost M. E., ; Pennings, Joost M. E., .
    In: 2007 Conference, April 16-17, 2007, Chicago, Illinois.
    RePEc:ags:nccsci:37569.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Loss Aversion? Not with Half-a-Million on the Table!. (2006). Pogrebna, Ganna ; Blavatskyy, Pavlo.
    In: IEW - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:iewwpx:274.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Averting risk in the face of large losses: Bernoulli vs. Tversky and Kahneman. (2006). Silvestre, Joaquim ; bosch-domènech, antoni ; Bosch-Domenech, Antoni.
    In: Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:upf:upfgen:932.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Disappointment without prior expectation: a unifying perspective on decision under risk. (2006). Cillo, Alessandra ; Delquie, Philippe .
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:33:y:2006:i:3:p:197-215.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. De laversion à lambiguïté aux attitudes face à lambiguïté. Les apports dune perspective psychologique en économie. (2006). Cabantous, Laure .
    In: Revue économique.
    RePEc:cai:recosp:reco_572_0259.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. What Drives Strategic Behavior? A Framework to Explain and Predict SMEs Transition to Sustainable Production Systems. (2006). Pennings, Joost ; Garcia, Philip ; Pennings, Joost M. E., ; Pennings, Joost M. E., ; Kalogeras, Nikos.
    In: 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea06:21354.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Explaining heterogeneity in utility functions by individual differences in decision modes. (2005). Schunk, Daniel.
    In: MEA discussion paper series.
    RePEc:mea:meawpa:05078.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. The Relationship Between Risk Attitudes and Heuristics in Search Tasks: A Laboratory Experiment. (2005). Winter, Joachim ; Schunk, Daniel.
    In: MEA discussion paper series.
    RePEc:mea:meawpa:05077.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Consumer Choices Under Small Probabilities: Overweighting or Underweighting?. (2005). Chen, Rong ; Jia, Jianmin.
    In: Marketing Letters.
    RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:16:y:2005:i:1:p:5-18.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Loss Averse Behavior. (2005). Brooks, Peter ; Zank, Horst.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:31:y:2005:i:3:p:301-325.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. What is Loss Aversion?. (2005). Schmidt, Ulrich ; Zank, Horst.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:30:y:2005:i:2:p:157-167.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Testing Prospect Theories Using Probability Tradeoff Consistency. (2005). Abdellaoui, Mohammed ; Zhang, Jiao ; Wu, George.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:30:y:2005:i:2:p:107-131.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Choices under ambiguity with familiar and unfamiliar outcomes.. (2004). Fontini, Fulvio ; Chateauneuf, Alain ; Basili, Marcello.
    In: Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques.
    RePEc:mse:wpsorb:b04115.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Framing and stakes: A survey study of decisions under uncertainty. (2004). Baucells, Manel ; Rata, Cristina.
    In: IESE Research Papers.
    RePEc:ebg:iesewp:d-0568.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Choice-Based Elicitation and Decomposition of Decision Weights for Gains and Losses Under Uncertainty. (2003). Weber, Martin ; Abdellaoui, Mohammed ; Vossman, Frank.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:3756.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Testing Theories of Choice Under Risk: Estimation of Individual Functionals. (2002). Blondel, Serge.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:24:y:2002:i:3:p:251-265.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Choice under Uncertainty with the Best and Worst in Mind: Neo-additive Capacities. (2002). Grant, Simon ; Eichberger, Jürgen ; Chateauneuf, Alain.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ecl:riceco:2002-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-03-05 21:47:02 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.