- Bar-Hillel, M., and A. Margalit, “How Vicious Are Cycles of Intransitive Choice?” Theory and Decision 24 (1988), 119–145.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Battalio, R. C., J. H. Kagel, and K. Jiranyakul, “Testing between Alternative Models of Choice under Uncertainty: Some Initial Results,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 3 (1990), 25–50.
Bell, D. E., “Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty,” Operations Research 30 (1982), 961–981.
Birnbaum, M. H., and U. Schmidt, “An Experimental Investigation of Violations of Transitivity in Choice under Uncertainty,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 37 (2008), 77.
- Birnbaum, Michael H, “Violations of Monotonicity in Judgment and Decision Making” (pp. 73–100), in Anthony A. J. Marley, ed., Choice, Decision, and Measurement: Essays in Honor of R. Duncan Luce (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1997).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Blavatskyy, P. R., “Axiomatization of a Preference for Most Probable Winner.” Theory and Decision 60:1 (2006), 17–33.
Bleichrodt, H., and P. P. Wakker, “Regret Theory: A Bold Alternative to the Alternatives,” Economic Journal 125 (2015), 493–532.
- Blyth, C. R., “Some Probability Paradoxes in Choice from among Random Alternatives,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 67 (1972), 366–373.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Castagnoli, E., “Some Remarks on Stochastic Dominance,” Rivista di Matematica per le Scienze Economiche e Sociali 7:1–2 (1984), 15–28.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Clutton-Brock, T. H., ed., Reproductive Success: Studies of Individual Variation in Contrasting Breeding Systems (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Day, B., and G. Loomes, “Conflicting Violations of Transitivity and Where They May Lead Us,” Theory and Decision 68 (2010), 233–242.
Dekel, E., and S. Scotchmer, “On the Evolution of Attitudes towards Risk in Winner-Take-All Games,” Journal of Economic Theory 87 (1999), 125–143.
- Fishburn, P. C., “Nontransitive Measurable Utility,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 26:1 (1982), 31–67.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Gilboa, I., “Questions in Decision Theory,” Annual Reviews of Economics 2 (2010), 1–19.
Harless, D. W., “Actions versus Prospects: The Effect of Problem Representation on Regret,” American Economic Review 82 (1992), 634–649.
Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky, “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,” Econometrica 47 (1979), 263–291.
- Levy, H. “Regret Theory: State Dominance and Expected Utility Theory,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 79 (2017), 1–12.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Levy, H. Stochastic Dominance: Investment Decision Making under Uncertainty (Berlin: Springer, 2015).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Levy, H., “First Degree Stochastic Dominance Violations: Decision Weights and Bounded Rationality,” Economic Journal 118 (2008), 759–774.
- Loomes, G., “Further Evidence of the Impact of Regret and Disappointment in Choice under Uncertainty,” Economica 55 (1988a), 47–62.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Loomes, G., “Predicted Violations of the Invariance Principle in Choice under Uncertainty,” Annals of Operations Research 19 (1989a). Loomes, G., “Experimental Economics” (pp. 152–178), in Current Issues in Microeconomics (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1989B).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Loomes, G., “When Actions Speak Louder Than Prospects,” American Economic Review 78 (1988b), 463–470.
Loomes, G., and C. Taylor, “Non-Transitive Preferences over Gains and Losses,” Economic Journal 102 (1992), 357–365.
Loomes, G., and R. Sugden “Some Implications of a More General Form of Regret Theory,” Journal of Economic Theory 41 (1987b), 270–287.
Loomes, G., and R. Sugden “Testing for Regret and Disappointment in Choice under Uncertainty,” Economic Journal, 97 (1987a), 118–129.
Loomes, G., and R. Sugden, “Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice under Uncertainty,” Economic Journal 92:368 (1982), 805–824.
Loomes, G., C. Starmer, and R. Sugden “Are Preferences Monotonic? Testing Some Predictions of Regret Theory,” Economica 59 (1992), 17–33.
- Paterson, I., and A. Diekmann, “A Paradox in Decision Theory and Some Experimental Results: The Relative Nature of Decisions,” Theory and Decision 25 (1988), 107–116.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Rubinstein, A., “Similarity and Decision-Making under Risk (Is There a Utility Theory Resolution to the Allais Paradox?),” Journal of Economic Theory 46 (1988), 145–153.
Sarver, T., “Anticipating Regret: Why Fewer Options May Be Better,” Econometrica 76 (2008), 263–305.
- Savage Leonard, J., The Foundations of Statistics (New York: Wiley 1954).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Scarsini, M., “A Note on Bernoulli's Principle and Probability Dominance,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 47:1 (1985), 109–113.
- Sengupta, J. K., “Maximum Probability Dominance and Portfolio Theory,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 71 (1991), 341–357.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Starmer, C., “Developments in Non-Expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk,” Journal of Economic Literature 38 (2000), 332–382.
Starmer, C., “Testing New Theories of Choice under Uncertainty Using the Common Consequence Effect,” Review of Economic Studies 59 (1992), 813–830.
- Starmer, C., and R. Sugden “Probability and Juxtaposition Effects: An Experimental Investigation of the Common Ratio Effect,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2 (1989a), 159–178.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Starmer, C., and R. Sugden “Testing for Juxtaposition and Event-Splitting Effects,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 6 (1993), 235–254.
- Starmer, C., and R. Sugden, “Violations of the Independence Axion in Common Ratio Problems: An Experimental Test of Some Competing Hypotheses,” Annals of Operations Research 19 (1989a), 79–102.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman, “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5 (1992), 297–323.
- Wakker, P. P., Prospect Theory: For Risk and Ambiguity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Wrather, C., and P. L. Yu, “Probability Dominance in Random Outcomes,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 36 (1982), 315–334.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now