Neuroscience and education: myths and messages

PA Howard-Jones - Nature reviews neuroscience, 2014 - nature.com
PA Howard-Jones
Nature reviews neuroscience, 2014nature.com
For several decades, myths about the brain—neuromyths—have persisted in schools and
colleges, often being used to justify ineffective approaches to teaching. Many of these myths
are biased distortions of scientific fact. Cultural conditions, such as differences in
terminology and language, have contributed to a'gap'between neuroscience and education
that has shielded these distortions from scrutiny. In recent years, scientific communications
across this gap have increased, although the messages are often distorted by the same …
Abstract
For several decades, myths about the brain — neuromyths — have persisted in schools and colleges, often being used to justify ineffective approaches to teaching. Many of these myths are biased distortions of scientific fact. Cultural conditions, such as differences in terminology and language, have contributed to a 'gap' between neuroscience and education that has shielded these distortions from scrutiny. In recent years, scientific communications across this gap have increased, although the messages are often distorted by the same conditions and biases as those responsible for neuromyths. In the future, the establishment of a new field of inquiry that is dedicated to bridging neuroscience and education may help to inform and to improve these communications.
nature.com