Semiautomatically quantified tumor volume using 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET as a biomarker for survival in patients with advanced prostate cancer

R Seifert, K Herrmann, J Kleesiek… - Journal of Nuclear …, 2020 - Soc Nuclear Med
Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2020Soc Nuclear Med
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–targeting PET imaging is becoming the
reference standard for prostate cancer staging, especially in advanced disease. Yet, the
implications of PSMA PET–derived whole-body tumor volume for overall survival are poorly
elucidated to date. This might be because semiautomated quantification of whole-body
tumor volume as a PSMA PET biomarker is an unmet clinical challenge. Therefore, in the
present study we propose and evaluate a software that enables the semiautomated …
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–targeting PET imaging is becoming the reference standard for prostate cancer staging, especially in advanced disease. Yet, the implications of PSMA PET–derived whole-body tumor volume for overall survival are poorly elucidated to date. This might be because semiautomated quantification of whole-body tumor volume as a PSMA PET biomarker is an unmet clinical challenge. Therefore, in the present study we propose and evaluate a software that enables the semiautomated quantification of PSMA PET biomarkers such as whole-body tumor volume.
Methods
The proposed quantification is implemented as a research prototype. PSMA-accumulating foci were automatically segmented by a percental threshold (50% of local SUVmax). Neural networks were trained to segment organs in PET/CT acquisitions (training CTs: 8,632, validation CTs: 53). Thereby, PSMA foci within organs of physiologic PSMA uptake were semiautomatically excluded from the analysis. Pretherapeutic PSMA PET/CTs of 40 consecutive patients treated with 177Lu-PSMA-617 were evaluated in this analysis. The whole-body tumor volume (PSMATV50), SUVmax, SUVmean, and other whole-body imaging biomarkers were calculated for each patient. Semiautomatically derived results were compared with manual readings in a subcohort (by 1 nuclear medicine physician). Additionally, an interobserver evaluation of the semiautomated approach was performed in a subcohort (by 2 nuclear medicine physicians).
Results
Manually and semiautomatically derived PSMA metrics were highly correlated (PSMATV50: R2 = 1.000, P < 0.001; SUVmax: R2 = 0.988, P < 0.001). The interobserver agreement of the semiautomated workflow was also high (PSMATV50: R2 = 1.000, P < 0.001, interclass correlation coefficient = 1.000; SUVmax: R2 = 0.988, P < 0.001, interclass correlation coefficient = 0.997). PSMATV50 (ml) was a significant predictor of overall survival (hazard ratio: 1.004; 95% confidence interval: 1.001–1.006, P = 0.002) and remained so in a multivariate regression including other biomarkers (hazard ratio: 1.004; 95% confidence interval: 1.001–1.006 P = 0.004).
Conclusion
PSMATV50 is a promising PSMA PET biomarker that is reproducible and easily quantified by the proposed semiautomated software. Moreover, PSMATV50 is a significant predictor of overall survival in patients with advanced prostate cancer who receive 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy.
Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging