Gender role and the use of university library website resources: A social cognitive theory perspective
YM Kim - Journal of Information Science, 2010 - journals.sagepub.com
Journal of Information Science, 2010•journals.sagepub.com
Existing studies have reported that significant gender differences exist in the use of
technology. For example, males have higher levels of computer self-efficacy, which enable
them to utilize technology more so than their counterparts. This difference could create a
potential disparity in the benefits of the utilization of university library website resources
(ULWR). The findings of this study show that male and female users' computer self-efficacy
is very different. Female users have lower levels of computer self-efficacy and subsequently …
technology. For example, males have higher levels of computer self-efficacy, which enable
them to utilize technology more so than their counterparts. This difference could create a
potential disparity in the benefits of the utilization of university library website resources
(ULWR). The findings of this study show that male and female users' computer self-efficacy
is very different. Female users have lower levels of computer self-efficacy and subsequently …
Existing studies have reported that significant gender differences exist in the use of technology. For example, males have higher levels of computer self-efficacy, which enable them to utilize technology more so than their counterparts. This difference could create a potential disparity in the benefits of the utilization of university library website resources (ULWR). The findings of this study show that male and female users’ computer self-efficacy is very different. Female users have lower levels of computer self-efficacy and subsequently, their intention to use ULWR is derived from a website’s ease-of-use. In contrast, male users’ intentions to use ULWR are derived from the subjective norm, a finding that challenges expectations based on social cognitive theory which posits that females are more likely than males to be influenced by others’ opinions. It is interpreted that males are much more goal- and performance-oriented than females. Detailed theoretical and managerial implications are offered.
Sage Journals