The Byzantine empire in the intercloud
M Vukolić - ACM Sigact News, 2010 - dl.acm.org
ACM Sigact News, 2010•dl.acm.org
The relevance of Byzantine fault tolerance in the context of cloud computing has been
questioned [3]. While arguments against Byzantine fault tolerance seemingly makes sense
in the context of a single cloud, ie, a large-scale cloud infrastructure that resides under
control of a single, typically commercial provider, these arguments are less obvious in a
broader context of the Intercloud, ie, a cloud of multiple, independent clouds. In this paper,
we start from commonly acknowledged issues that impede the adoption of Byzantine fault …
questioned [3]. While arguments against Byzantine fault tolerance seemingly makes sense
in the context of a single cloud, ie, a large-scale cloud infrastructure that resides under
control of a single, typically commercial provider, these arguments are less obvious in a
broader context of the Intercloud, ie, a cloud of multiple, independent clouds. In this paper,
we start from commonly acknowledged issues that impede the adoption of Byzantine fault …
The relevance of Byzantine fault tolerance in the context of cloud computing has been questioned [3]. While arguments against Byzantine fault tolerance seemingly makes sense in the context of a single cloud, i.e., a large-scale cloud infrastructure that resides under control of a single, typically commercial provider, these arguments are less obvious in a broader context of the Intercloud, i.e., a cloud of multiple, independent clouds.
In this paper, we start from commonly acknowledged issues that impede the adoption of Byzantine fault tolerance within a single cloud, and argue that many of these issues fade when Byzantine fault tolerance in the Intercloud is considered.