Halo: a technique for visualizing off-screen objects
P Baudisch, R Rosenholtz - Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on …, 2003 - dl.acm.org
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 2003•dl.acm.org
As users pan and zoom, display content can disappear into off-screen space, particularly on
small-screen devices. The clipping of locations, such as relevant places on a map, can make
spatial cognition tasks harder. Halo is a visualization technique that supports spatial
cognition by showing users the location of off-screen objects. Halo accomplishes this by
surrounding off-screen objects with rings that are just large enough to reach into the border
region of the display window. From the portion of the ring that is visible on-screen, users can …
small-screen devices. The clipping of locations, such as relevant places on a map, can make
spatial cognition tasks harder. Halo is a visualization technique that supports spatial
cognition by showing users the location of off-screen objects. Halo accomplishes this by
surrounding off-screen objects with rings that are just large enough to reach into the border
region of the display window. From the portion of the ring that is visible on-screen, users can …
As users pan and zoom, display content can disappear into off-screen space, particularly on small-screen devices. The clipping of locations, such as relevant places on a map, can make spatial cognition tasks harder. Halo is a visualization technique that supports spatial cognition by showing users the location of off-screen objects. Halo accomplishes this by surrounding off-screen objects with rings that are just large enough to reach into the border region of the display window. From the portion of the ring that is visible on-screen, users can infer the off-screen location of the object at the center of the ring. We report the results of a user study comparing Halo with an arrow-based visualization technique with respect to four types of map-based route planning tasks. When using the Halo interface, users completed tasks 16-33% faster, while there were no significant differences in error rate for three out of four tasks in our study.
ACM Digital Library