Acute effect of percutaneous MitraClip therapy in patients with haemodynamic decompensation
S Biner, RJ Siegel, T Feldman… - European journal of …, 2012 - Wiley Online Library
European journal of heart failure, 2012•Wiley Online Library
Aims To evaluate the haemodynamic effect of acute procedural success (APS) after
MitraClip therapy in patients with haemodynamic decompensation. Methods and results Of
107 patients, 79 achieved APS after MitraClip implantation. The increase in cardiac index
(CI) was primarily detected in patients with a low baseline CI (2.0±0.5 to 2.5±5 L/min/m 2, P<
0.001). There was a decrease in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP)(20±5 to
13±5 mmHg, P= 0.002) and mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWPm)(20±4 to …
MitraClip therapy in patients with haemodynamic decompensation. Methods and results Of
107 patients, 79 achieved APS after MitraClip implantation. The increase in cardiac index
(CI) was primarily detected in patients with a low baseline CI (2.0±0.5 to 2.5±5 L/min/m 2, P<
0.001). There was a decrease in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP)(20±5 to
13±5 mmHg, P= 0.002) and mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWPm)(20±4 to …
Abstract
Aims
To evaluate the haemodynamic effect of acute procedural success (APS) after MitraClip therapy in patients with haemodynamic decompensation.
Methods and results
Of 107 patients, 79 achieved APS after MitraClip implantation. The increase in cardiac index (CI) was primarily detected in patients with a low baseline CI (2.0±0.5 to 2.5±5 L/min/m 2, P< 0.001). There was a decrease in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP)(20±5 to 13±5 mmHg, P= 0.002) and mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWPm)(20±4 to 16±5 mmHg, P= 0.001) in patients with values> 15 mmHg at baseline, and a decrease in mean pulmonary artery systolic (PAPm)(36±4 to 29±7 mmHg P= 0.003) in those with values> 30 mmHg before the MitraClip procedure. Patients with decompensation compared with patients with compensation experienced significant reduction in LVEDP (–8.3±11.9 mmHg vs.–0.2±4.5 mmHg, P= 0.009), a reduction in PCWPm (–3.5±5.6 mmHg vs. 1.9±4.7 mmHg, P< 0.001), and a reduction in PAPm (–8±9 mmHg vs. 3±6 mmHg, P< 0.001).
Conclusion
The favourable haemodynamic effects of MitraClip therapy on CI were primarily detected in patients with low CI before the procedure, and improvements in left-sided filling pressure and PAP were primarily seen in those with elevated values at baseline.
Wiley Online Library