Competing provers yield improved Karp–Lipton collapse results
Information and Computation, 2005•Elsevier
Via competing provers, we show that if a language A is self-reducible and has polynomial-
size circuits then S2A= S2. Building on this, we strengthen the Kämper–AFK theorem,
namely, we prove that if NP⊆(NP∩ coNP)/poly then the polynomial hierarchy collapses to
S2NP∩ coNP. We also strengthen Yap's theorem, namely, we prove that if NP⊆ coNP/poly
then the polynomial hierarchy collapses to S2NP. Under the same assumptions, the best
previously known collapses were to ZPPNP and [Formula: see text], respectively ([SIAM …
size circuits then S2A= S2. Building on this, we strengthen the Kämper–AFK theorem,
namely, we prove that if NP⊆(NP∩ coNP)/poly then the polynomial hierarchy collapses to
S2NP∩ coNP. We also strengthen Yap's theorem, namely, we prove that if NP⊆ coNP/poly
then the polynomial hierarchy collapses to S2NP. Under the same assumptions, the best
previously known collapses were to ZPPNP and [Formula: see text], respectively ([SIAM …
Via competing provers, we show that if a language A is self-reducible and has polynomial-size circuits then S2A=S2. Building on this, we strengthen the Kämper–AFK theorem, namely, we prove that if NP⊆(NP∩coNP)/poly then the polynomial hierarchy collapses to S2NP∩coNP. We also strengthen Yap’s theorem, namely, we prove that if NP⊆coNP/poly then the polynomial hierarchy collapses to S2NP. Under the same assumptions, the best previously known collapses were to ZPPNP and [Formula: see text] , respectively ([SIAM Journal on Computing 28 (1) (1998) 311; Journal of Computer and System Sciences 52 (3) (1996) 421], building on [Proceedings of the 12th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, ACM Press, New York, 1980, pp. 302–309; Journal of Computer and System Sciences 39 (1989) 21; Theoretical Computer Science 85 (2) (1991) 305; Theoretical Computer Science 26 (3) (1983) 287]). It is known that S2⊆ZPPNP [Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, IEEE Computer Society Press, Silver Spring, MD, 2001, pp. 620–629]. That result and its relativized version show that our new collapses indeed improve the previously known results. The Kämper–AFK theorem and Yap’s theorem are used in the literature as bridges in a variety of results—ranging from the study of unique solutions to issues of approximation—and so our results implicitly strengthen those results.
Elsevier