On the complexity of propositional knowledge base revision, updates, and counterfactuals
Proceedings of the eleventh ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART symposium on principles …, 1992•dl.acm.org
We study the complexity of several recently proposed methods for updating or revising
propositional knowledge bases. In particular, we derive complexity results for the following
problem: given a knowledge base T, an update p, and a formula q, decide whether q is
derivable from Top, the updated (or revised) knowledge base. This problem amounts to
evaluating the counterfactual p> q over T. Besides the general case, also subcases are
considered, in particular where T is a conjunction of Horn clauses, or where the size of p is …
propositional knowledge bases. In particular, we derive complexity results for the following
problem: given a knowledge base T, an update p, and a formula q, decide whether q is
derivable from Top, the updated (or revised) knowledge base. This problem amounts to
evaluating the counterfactual p> q over T. Besides the general case, also subcases are
considered, in particular where T is a conjunction of Horn clauses, or where the size of p is …
We study the complexity of several recently proposed methods for updating or revising propositional knowledge bases. In particular, we derive complexity results for the following problem: given a knowledge base T, an update p, and a formula q, decide whether q is derivable from Top, the updated (or revised) knowledge base. This problem amounts to evaluating the counterfactual p > q over T. Besides the general case, also subcases are considered, in particular where T is a conjunction of Horn clauses, or where the size of p is bounded by a constant.
ACM Digital Library