Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: update tokenless branch logic #1650

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Nov 15, 2024
Merged

Conversation

thomasrockhu-codecov
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

action.yml Fixed Show fixed Hide fixed
action.yml Fixed Show fixed Hide fixed
action.yml Fixed Show fixed Hide fixed
@thomasrockhu-codecov thomasrockhu-codecov merged commit 2e2a9c6 into main Nov 15, 2024
13 checks passed
@thomasrockhu-codecov thomasrockhu-codecov deleted the th/fix-tokenless-branches branch November 15, 2024 12:50
env:
CC_BRANCH: ${{ inputs.override_branch }}
GITHUB_EVENT_PULL_REQUEST_HEAD_LABEL: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.label }}
GITHUB_EVENT_PULL_REQUEST_REPO_FULL_NAME: ${{ github.event.pull_request.repo.full_name }}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Greetings.

I am not sure where did full_name come from. This event variable does not exist in the documentation, and it is also not outputting anything when I am testing it in my repositories (not forks).

And due to that fact, the following check here:
if [ -z "$CC_BRANCH" ] && [ -z "$CODECOV_TOKEN" ] && [ "${GITHUB_EVENT_PULL_REQUEST_REPO_FULL_NAME}" != "$GITHUB_REPOSITORY"
is always false when I am upgrading to codecov-action v5, which leads to some side effects with the token check.

So, unless I am missing something, I think it is a bug.

Best,
Rust

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@amureki there was a slight bug, but that has been fixed in 5.0.3. As for why is it empty, it seems that this variable when not from a fork will be empty, thus the issue you were seeing.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, got it @thomasrockhu-codecov
Thank you for the explanation and resolving the issue!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants