Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Kinetic and morphology study of alginate-vineyard pruning waste biocomposite vs. non modified vineyard pruning waste for dye removal

J Environ Sci (China). 2015 Dec:38:158-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2015.05.032. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

Abstract

In this work a comparative bioadsorption study between a biocomposite consisting of hydrolysed vineyard pruning waste entrapped in calcium alginate spheres and non entrapped vineyard residue was carried out. Results have demonstrated that the biocomposite based on lignocellulose-calcium alginate spheres removed 77.3% of dyes, while non entrapped lignocellulose eliminated only removed 27.8% of colour compounds. The experimental data were fitted to several kinetic models (pseudo-first order, pseudo-second order, Chien-Clayton model, intraparticle diffusion model and Bangham model); being pseudo-second order the kinetic model that better described the adsorption of dyes onto both bioadsorbents. In addition, a morphological study (roughness and shape) of alginate-vineyard biocomposite was established under extreme conditions, observing significant differences between hydrated and dehydrated alginate-vineyard biocomposite. The techniques used to carry out this morphological study consisted of scanning electron microscopy (SEM), perfilometry and 3D surface analysis.

Keywords: Dyes; Immobilized alginate-vineyard; Kinetic studies; Roughness; Spherical shape.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Agriculture*
  • Alginates / chemistry*
  • Coloring Agents / chemistry*
  • Glucuronic Acid / chemistry
  • Hexuronic Acids / chemistry
  • Industrial Waste
  • Kinetics
  • Water Pollutants, Chemical / chemistry*

Substances

  • Alginates
  • Coloring Agents
  • Hexuronic Acids
  • Industrial Waste
  • Water Pollutants, Chemical
  • Glucuronic Acid