Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
PMC home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1988 Jan;54(1):10–19. doi: 10.1128/aem.54.1.10-19.1988

Control of Interspecies Electron Flow during Anaerobic Digestion: Role of Floc Formation in Syntrophic Methanogenesis

Jurgen H Thiele 1, M Chartrain 1,†, J Gregory Zeikus 1,*
PMCID: PMC202390  PMID: 16347517

Abstract

The flora of an anaerobic whey-processing chemostat was separated by anaerobic sedimentation techniques into a free-living bacterial fraction and a bacterial floc fraction. The floc fraction constituted a major part (i.e., 57% total protein) of the total microbial population in the digestor, and it accounted for 87% of the total CO2-dependent methanogenic activity and 76% of the total ethanol-consuming acetogenic activity. Lactose was degraded by both cellular fractions, but in the free flora fraction it was associated with higher intermediary levels of H2, ethanol, butyrate, and propionate production. Electron microscopic analysis of flocs showed bacterial diversity and juxtapositioning of tentative Desulfovibrio and Methanobacterium species without significant microcolony formation. Ethanol, an intermediary product of lactose-hydrolyzing bacteria, was converted to acetate and methane within the flocs by interspecies electron transfer. Ethanol-dependent methane formation was compartmentalized and closely coupled kinetically within the flocs but without significant formation of H2 gas. Physical disruption of flocs into fragments of 10- to 20-μm diameter initially increased the H2 partial pressure but did not change the carbon transformation kinetic patterns of ethanol metabolism or demonstrate a significant role for H2 in CO2 reduction to methane. The data demonstrate that floc formation in a whey-processing anaerobic digestor functions in juxtapositioning cells for interspecies electron transfer during syntrophic ethanol conversion into acetate and methane but by a mechanism which was independent of the available dissolved H2 gas pool in the ecosystem.

Full text

PDF
10

Images in this article

15Image
on p.15

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boone D. R., Bryant M. P. Propionate-Degrading Bacterium, Syntrophobacter wolinii sp. nov. gen. nov., from Methanogenic Ecosystems. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 Sep;40(3):626–632. doi: 10.1128/aem.40.3.626-632.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bryant M. P., Campbell L. L., Reddy C. A., Crabill M. R. Growth of desulfovibrio in lactate or ethanol media low in sulfate in association with H2-utilizing methanogenic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 May;33(5):1162–1169. doi: 10.1128/aem.33.5.1162-1169.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bryant M. P., Wolin E. A., Wolin M. J., Wolfe R. S. Methanobacillus omelianskii, a symbiotic association of two species of bacteria. Arch Mikrobiol. 1967;59(1):20–31. doi: 10.1007/BF00406313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chartrain M., Bhatnagar L., Zeikus J. G. Microbial ecophysiology of whey biomethanation: comparison of carbon transformation parameters, species composition, and starter culture performance in continuous culture. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 May;53(5):1147–1156. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.5.1147-1156.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chartrain M., Zeikus J. G. Microbial ecophysiology of whey biomethanation: characterization of bacterial trophic populations and prevalent species in continuous culture. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Jan;51(1):188–196. doi: 10.1128/aem.51.1.188-196.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cheng K. J., Costerton J. W. The formation of microcolonies by rumen bacteria. Can J Microbiol. 1980 Sep;26(9):1104–1113. doi: 10.1139/m80-183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Conrad R., Phelps T. J., Zeikus J. G. Gas metabolism evidence in support of the juxtaposition of hydrogen-producing and methanogenic bacteria in sewage sludge and lake sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 Sep;50(3):595–601. doi: 10.1128/aem.50.3.595-601.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Costerton J. W., Irvin R. T., Cheng K. J. The bacterial glycocalyx in nature and disease. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1981;35:299–324. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.35.100181.001503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ferry J. G., Wolfe R. S. Anaerobic degradation of benzoate to methane by a microbial consortium. Arch Microbiol. 1976 Feb;107(1):33–40. doi: 10.1007/BF00427864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hartree E. F. Determination of protein: a modification of the Lowry method that gives a linear photometric response. Anal Biochem. 1972 Aug;48(2):422–427. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(72)90094-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jones W. J., Guyot J. P., Wolfe R. S. Methanogenesis from sucrose by defined immobilized consortia. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Jan;47(1):1–6. doi: 10.1128/aem.47.1.1-6.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kenealy W., Zeikus J. G. Influence of corrinoid antagonists on methanogen metabolism. J Bacteriol. 1981 Apr;146(1):133–140. doi: 10.1128/jb.146.1.133-140.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McInerney M. J., Bryant M. P., Hespell R. B., Costerton J. W. Syntrophomonas wolfei gen. nov. sp. nov., an Anaerobic, Syntrophic, Fatty Acid-Oxidizing Bacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Apr;41(4):1029–1039. doi: 10.1128/aem.41.4.1029-1039.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Oremland R. S. Hydrogen metabolism by decomposing cyanobacterial aggregates in big soda lake, nevada. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 May;45(5):1519–1525. doi: 10.1128/aem.45.5.1519-1525.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Phelps T. J., Conrad R., Zeikus J. G. Sulfate-Dependent Interspecies H(2) Transfer between Methanosarcina barkeri and Desulfovibrio vulgaris during Coculture Metabolism of Acetate or Methanol. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 Sep;50(3):589–594. doi: 10.1128/aem.50.3.589-594.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sahm H. Anaerobic wastewater treatment. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 1984;29:83–115. doi: 10.1007/BFb0000691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Thauer R. K., Jungermann K., Decker K. Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria. Bacteriol Rev. 1977 Mar;41(1):100–180. doi: 10.1128/br.41.1.100-180.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Thiele Jurgen H., Zeikus J. Gregory. Control of Interspecies Electron Flow during Anaerobic Digestion: Significance of Formate Transfer versus Hydrogen Transfer during Syntrophic Methanogenesis in Flocs. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Jan;54(1):20–29. doi: 10.1128/aem.54.1.20-29.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zeikus J. G., Bowen V. G. Fine structure of Methanospirillum hungatii. J Bacteriol. 1975 Jan;121(1):373–380. doi: 10.1128/jb.121.1.373-380.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES