Abstract
Genetically encoded sensor proteins provide unique opportunities to advance the understanding of complex cellular interactions in physiologically relevant contexts; however, previously described sensors have proved to be of limited use to report cell signaling in vivo in mammals. Here, we describe an improved Ca2+ sensor, GCaMP2, its inducible expression in the mouse heart, and its use to examine signaling in heart cells in vivo. The high brightness and stability of GCaMP2 enable the measurement of myocyte Ca2+ transients in all regions of the beating mouse heart and prolonged pacing and mapping studies in isolated, perfused hearts. Transgene expression is efficiently temporally regulated in cardiomyocyte GCaMP2 mice, allowing recording of in vivo signals 4 weeks after transgene induction. High-resolution imaging of Ca2+ waves in GCaMP2-expressing embryos revealed key aspects of electrical conduction in the preseptated heart. At embryonic day (e.d.) 10.5, atrial and ventricular conduction occur rapidly, consistent with the early formation of specialized conduction pathways. However, conduction is markedly slowed through the atrioventricular canal in the e.d. 10.5 heart, forming the basis for an effective atrioventricular delay before development of the AV node, as rapid ventricular activation occurs after activation of the distal AV canal tissue. Consistent with the elimination of the inner AV canal muscle layer at e.d. 13.5, atrioventricular conduction through the canal was abolished at this stage. These studies demonstrate that GCaMP2 will have broad utility in the dissection of numerous complex cellular interactions in mammals, in vivo.
Keywords: atrioventricular node, Ca2+ imaging, genetic sensor, heart development, fluorescent Ca2+ sensor
Transient, highly regulated elevations in cytosolic free Ca2+ underlie numerous cellular processes that enable organ function (1–5). In the mammalian heart, for example, efficient function depends upon the coordinated release and reuptake of Ca2+ ions from intracellular organelles in millions of cells, at rates between 0.5 and 15 Hz throughout life, and even subtle dysfunctions of this process can result in cardiac arrythmias and sudden death. Whereas fluorescent imaging using purpose-designed small Ca2+-binding indicator molecules has enabled important advances in the understanding of the regulatory processes underlying Ca2+ signaling in single cells (6, 7), these approaches have significant limitations in the context of a complex, multicellular organ such as the beating heart. Thus, difficulties in obtaining an adequate and stable concentration of indicator molecules within cells deep in complex tissues, the incompatibility of loading procedures in the in vivo setting, and the inability to selectively load specific cell lineages constitute substantial experimental constraints on the study of multicellular, processive Ca2+ signaling in complex organ function. Genetically encoded sensors of Ca2+ signaling (7–13) hold great promise in this regard and have been used to study signaling in lower organisms (14–17), but they have not been effectively used in mammals in vivo because of poor intrinsic signal strength, alinearity, inadequate temperature stability, or perturbing interactions between the sensing molecule and endogenous cellular proteins (18–21). Recently Pologruto et al. (21) illustrated this point by a careful comparison of the performance of GCaMP1 (11), Camgaroo2 (22), and Inverse Pericam (12) with the small molecule Ca2+ probes X-Rhod-5F and Fluo4-FF in brain slices, demonstrating the inability of the genetic indicators to detect physiologic, low-frequency action potential Ca2+ transients (see also ref. 23). Here, we report a markedly improved genetically encoded Ca2+ reporter molecule based on circular permutation of GFP (cpGFP) (10–12), its conditional expression in the hearts of transgenic mice, and the use of the sensor to monitor Ca2+ transients in the beating heart of adult and embryonic mice in vivo and in vitro.
Results and Discussion
Development of GCaMP2.
Designed and random alterations in the previously described, circularly permutated eGFP-based, Ca2+-sensing molecule, which we now term GCaMP1 (11), were undertaken to improve brightness and stability. Ca2+-dependent fluorescence of GCaMP arises from the interaction between Ca2+/calmodulin at the C terminus of cpGFP and an N-terminal myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) fragment. GCaMP1 has only a fraction of the brightness of the parent eGFP molecule and is unstable at physiological temperatures. To address these deficiencies, three mutations were first introduced into GCaMP1: V163A, S175G, and A206K (Fig. 1a); V163A and S175G are previously described mutations that improved the temperature stability of GFP (24), whereas the A206K was introduced to prevent GFP dimerization (25). V163A and S175G mutations in GCaMP1 were previously reported as GCaMP1.6 (26), result in an intermediate improvement in the brightness of GCaMP1, but neither these mutations or A206K correct the instability above 30°C. A plasmid leader sequence (RSET) was attached to the N terminus for purification, GCaMP1.6 cDNA was subjected to PCR-based random mutagenesis, and bacterial colonies displaying the brightest fluorescence at 37°C were picked and sequenced (see Materials and Methods). This process identified two new mutations (D180Y and V93I) in separate β-sheets that improved the brightness of the cpGFP molecule. The addition of the N-terminal 35-residue polyHis RSET linked to the MLCK sequence was critical for thermal stability, because removal of the leader sequence led to loss of fluorescence at 37°C. The RSET-M13-cpGFP-calmodulin molecule GCaMP2 (GenBank accession no. DQ381402) is, respectively, ≈200 times and 6 times brighter than GCaMP1 and GCaMP1.6, and displays a similar 4- to 5-fold increase in signal between 0 and saturating Ca2+ (Fig. 1b; Table 1). Most importantly, the thermal stability of GCaMP2 results in retained high brightness at 37°C (Fig. 1c). Titrations of purified GCaMP2 protein with fixed Ca2+ solutions indicated highly cooperative Ca2+ binding over the physiological range of cellular free Ca2+ (KD = 146 nM; Hill coefficient = 3.8), with no significant Mg2+ dependence (data not shown). The high brightness, thermal stability, and large dynamic range of GCaMP2 constitute significant attributes relative to previously reported genetic Ca2+ sensors (refs. 11, 12, and 22 and Table 1), suggesting that the molecule may enable the detection of physiological Ca2+ signals in mice in vivo. A previous report (27) has described the use of GCaMP2 for in vitro measurements.
Table 1.
Name | Ca2+ | λabs (ε) | λem (Φ) | Brightness (ε × Φ) |
---|---|---|---|---|
G-CaMP1 | − | 409 (1,100) | ||
488 (570) | 510 (0.03) | 17 | ||
+ | 410 (690) | |||
487 (1,400) | 510 (0.05) | 70 | ||
G-CaMP1.6 | − | 404 (5,800) | ||
489 (1,100) | 510 (0.56) | 616 | ||
+ | 403 (5,200) | |||
488 (3,800) | 509 (0.79) | 3,002 | ||
G-CaMP2 | − | 400 (11,100) | ||
491 (5,200) | 511 (0.70) | 3,640 | ||
+ | 401 (5,800) | |||
487 (19,000) | 508 (0.93) | 17,670 |
Transgenic Mice Conditionally Expressing GCaMP2 in Heart Cells.
We conditionally expressed GCaMP2 in heart cells using a tet-Off system, to avoid potential pathology associated with high expression of a Ca2+-binding protein in myocytes. GCaMP2 was placed downstream of a weakened α myosin heavy chain (ΔαMHC) promoter and seven tetO enhancer sequences (28) (Fig. 1d). Six founder lines (ccGCaMP2 mice) were crossed with hemizygous αMHC-tetracycline transactivator allele (tTA) transgenic mice expressing the hybrid transactivator protein (28) and screened for transgene expression in the absence of doxycycline (dox). Three lines of ccGCaMP2 were selected as having strong, homogenous transgene expression in all areas of the heart and minimal or no leak expression of GCaMP2 in the absence of the tetracycline transactivator allele (tTA-mice) (Fig. 1e). As expected, transgene expression in the hearts of double transgenic [ccGCaMP2+/tTA+ (ccGC2)] mice was restricted to myocytes, with no staining observed in endocardial, coronary vascular smooth muscle, or non-muscle tissues; expression was observed in smooth muscle in the large pulmonary arteries, likely reflecting the derivation of these tissues from myocardium (29). Administration of dox for 2–5 weeks resulted in a time-dependent decrease of transgene expression, with almost complete suppression by 3–4 weeks (Fig. 1e). Unregulated expression of GCaMP2 from birth resulted in significant cardiomegaly in adult double transgenic mice, similar to that reported in mice with targeted overexpression of calmodulin (30). However, heart size in mice maintained on dox from birth and hearts from GCaMP2+ or tTA+ single transgenic mice were not enlarged relative to strain-matched WT controls (Fig. 1g), further demonstrating effective regulation of transgene expression by dox. Because GCaMP2 expression is effectively regulated, ccGC2 mice should be useful for the study of cardiac hypertrophy during controlled induction. To demonstrate that this phenotype can be effectively avoided, mice were maintained on dox starting in utero until 13–15 weeks and then removed for up to 6 weeks, and transgene expression was monitored. No cardiomegaly was detected up to 6 weeks after withdrawal (Fig. 1f), whereas transgene expression was detected by 2 weeks and robust functional signals were recorded beginning 4 weeks after withdrawal (see below). We confirmed that expression of GCaMP2 does not itself alter excitation–contraction coupling characteristics of heart cells by transiently loading control and transgenic hearts with the Ca2+-sensitive dye Rhod2. In four transgenic and age-matched control hearts, the amplitude and duration of Rhod2 ventricular Ca2+ transients were not significantly different (Fig. 1g).
Optical Measurements of Ca2+ Transients in the Heart in Vivo.
A prominent increase in eGFP fluorescence was observed in vivo in open-chested, ventilated, ccGC2 mice in all heart regions with every systole. As shown in Fig. 2a and Movie 1, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site, Ca2+-dependent fluorescence was restricted to cardiac muscle, resulting in the highlighting of the vasculature pattern by the surrounding fluorescent cardiac myocytes. The increase in fluorescence observed between end diastole and peak systole varied between ≈0.5 and 1.5 (ΔF/Fdiastole) in spontaneously beating, adult hearts, and high signal/noise Ca2+ transients could be measured in all areas of the surface without constraining heart motion. Similar results were obtained in neonatal mice as early as 1 day after birth (Fig. 2b), although the level of transgene expression was more modest at this stage. Inotropic stimulation of the heart with isoproterenol (iso) resulted in a marked augmentation in end-diastolic and peak-systolic GCaMP2 fluorescence, and in the amplitude and rate of rise of the Ca2+-dependent fluorescent transients, which were obtained from individual heart regions as small as 30 μm2 beginning at postnatal day 1 (Fig. 2 b and c). In vivo recordings were also obtained from phenotypically normal mice withdrawn from dox for 4–6 weeks (Fig. 2d), indicating the ability to experimentally circumvent cardiac hypertrophy. To our knowledge, there are no previously reported measurements of cellular Ca2+ transients in the mammalian heart in vivo, or while the heart is pumping against a physiological load.
Optical Measurements of Ca2+ Transients in the Isolated, Perfused Heart.
To more quantitatively examine GCaMP2 signaling in the intact heart, cellular Ca2+ transients from the heart surface were recorded in spontaneously beating, isolated, perfused hearts by using photodiode arrays or a high-speed complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) camera (see Materials and Methods). The high brightness of GCaMP2 enabled the recording of Ca2+ signals with excellent signal/noise characteristics and spatial resolution over the entire heart surface (Fig. 3a and Movie 2, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site). Fluorescent transients in paced hearts were not altered by inhibition of contraction with 2 μM cytochalasin D, indicating a lack of significant motion artifact in this system (data not shown). Transients recorded at frame rates as high as 5 kHz from a single pixel comprising a spatial dimension of ≈40 μm2, or <10 myocytes, were highly stable, providing reproducible Ca2+ signals from all heart regions for up to 5 h without signal/noise deterioration or loss of signal amplitude (Fig. 3 b and c). In a series of experiments, the conduction velocity of the Ca2+ transient was 24.1 ± 3.7 cm/s and increased 8–20% after perfusion with 1 μM iso. The spectral separation between GCaMP2 and commonly used potentiometric dyes (31) also allowed the simultaneous optical recordings of action potential and Ca2+ transients using spatially registered photodiode arrays (32). GCaMP2-expressing hearts were briefly loaded with RH237, illuminated at wavelengths that excited both indicators, and imaged with spatially registered photodiode arrays (Fig. 3d). Action potentials and Ca2+ signals were recorded from the same heart regions in spontaneously beating and paced hearts; the presence of the Ca2+ indicator in cardiac cytosol did not alter the characteristics of cardiac action potentials.
Biophysical Characteristics of GCaMP2 in Vivo.
When expressed as transgenes in animals, genetically encoded sensors undergo unpredictable changes in photochemical properties, most likely because of interactions between the indicator and endogenous proteins, resulting in a marked degradation of indicator signaling properties relative to those observed in transiently transfected cells in tissue culture (20, 21, 23). To determine the behavior of GCaMP2 in this context, we compared Ca2+-dependent fluorescence of heart cytosol from ccGC2 mice with GCaMP2 protein purified from bacteria. The Ca2+ affinity of GCaMP2 in cardiac cytosol was somewhat lower than the purified protein (KD 188 versus 146 nM), but the Hill slope (3.8) was equivalent and the high indicator dynamic range was maintained (data not shown). An equivalent shift was detected by using cardiomyocytes isolated from transgenic hearts and fixed Ca2+ concentrations in the presence of ionomycin (data not shown). We estimated the concentration of GCaMP2 expressed in ccGC2 mouse hearts at 1.6 μM, by comparing the magnitude of fluorescence of diluted cytosol (488/508) under saturating Ca2+ conditions with that of the purified protein.
Fusion protein indicators such as GCaMP2 undergo complex transitions to and from the photoactive state, potentially resulting in kinetic discrepancies between the underlying signal and emitted fluorescence. In the context of rapid Ca2+ signaling in the heart, these transition delays would be expected to result in a significant distortion of the underlying rapid Ca2+ transient kinetics and might be affected by interaction with endogenous proteins. We examined the fluorescence association and dissociation kinetics of GCaMP2 in ccGC2 heart cytosol in stop-flow experiments and compared these with the purified protein. As shown in Fig. 4a and b and Table 2, the association time constant was ≈14 ms and did not vary significantly as a function of cytosol concentration; addition of purified GCaMP2 protein to cardiac cytosol also did not alter the association kinetics (data not shown). The fluorescence association rate constant of the purified protein was equivalent to that of cardiac cytosol, indicating that neither competing Ca2+ buffers within the cytosol nor interactions between GCaMP2 and cytosolic proteins significantly alter the kinetic performance of GCaMP2. The dissociation time constant was ≈75 ms for cardiac cytosol, which was equivalent to purified protein and unaffected by cytosol dilution or addition of recombinant GCaMP2 (Table 2). Thus, the association and dissociation time constants for GCaMP2 are markedly faster than reported for GCaMP1 (11), almost certainly because of evaluation of the less stable GCaMP1 kinetics at room temperature; not surprisingly decreases in temperature similarly delayed fluorescence transitions in GCaMP2 (Fig. 4 a and b and Table 2). Of interest was the absence of the prominent Ca2+ dependence of the association time constant of GCaMP1, which increases steeply below ≈400 nM (11); fluorescence on and off rates for GCaMP2 were equivalent over a 200-fold range of free Ca2+. The more rapid and simpler kinetics of GCaMP2 at 37°C constitute a marked advantage for the measurement of rapid Ca2+ signals although, in the context of the rapidly beating mouse heart, fluorescence transitions in the ms range would be expected to produce predictable distortions of the underlying Ca2+ transients at higher rates.
Table 2.
Sample | Concentration | Temp., °C | τon, ms | +ΔCa2+, nM | τoff, ms | −ΔCa2+, nM | No. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cytosol | 4× dilution | 37 | 14.29 ± 0.30 | 0.02→240 | 75.19 ± 0.68 | 91→0.02 | 1 |
Cytosol | 32× dilution | 37 | 13.85 ± 0.22 | 0.02→240 | 78.62 ± 0.57 | 12.3→0.02 | 2 |
Cytosol | 32× dilution | 20 | 27.4 ± 1.28* | 0.02→240 | 429 ± 1.47* | 12.3→0.02 | 3 |
Purified | 1 nM | 37 | 15.50 ± 5.10 | 0.02→61 | 73 ± 0.767 | 2200→0.02 | 4 |
Average time constants were derived from stop-flow experiments with step changes of free Ca2+ as indicated. The last column refers to traces shown in Fig. 3, which are representative of each condition. Only temperature had a significant effect on fluorescence time constants
(*, P < 0.05 by ANOVA).
To determine the effect of slower fluorescence transitions of GCaMP2 on rapid heart Ca2+ transients, we measured Ca2+ signals in paced hearts from ccGC2 mice transiently loaded with Rhod2, a fast Ca2+ indicator. GCaMP2 and Rhod2 fluorescent signals simultaneously recorded from the same array subregions provided a direct comparison of the raw signals. The dynamic range (ΔF/Fo) of GCaMP2 was almost three times greater than observed for Rhod2 during cardiac cycles (data not shown); however, GCaMP2 fluorescence signals displayed a consistent, rate-dependent delay relative to the fast dye (Fig. 4c). In a series of experiments in hearts paced at 200-ms cycle length, the rise of the GCaMP2 raw fluorescent signal was 45% slower than the Rhod2 signal (38.2 ± 4.2 vs. 26.3 ± 2.8 ms), and the diastolic decay similarly prolonged. The lagging GCaMP2 signals were well explained by the slower fluorescence transition kinetics, because the converted Ca2+ signals matched when corrected by using fluorescent association and dissociation rate constants obtained experimentally (Fig. 4c Inset; Rhod 2 transition kinetics were submillisecond and could not be measured by stop-flow). At cycle lengths lower than ≈200 ms, a rise in basal fluorescence was observed proportional to the stimulation rate, indicating that complete decay of fluorescence did not occur during diastole. Ca2+ sparks were not observed in single, voltage-clamped myocytes enzymatically prepared from the hearts of double transgenic mice, a limitation shared by other small molecule Ca2+ indicators such as Fura2; bulk cytosolic transients were readily recorded in single myocytes (data not shown).
Conduction of Ca2+ Waves in the Embryonic Heart.
Genetically encoded cell sensors are particularly useful in the dissection of the complex cellular interactions that occur during development. We examined GCaMP2 signals in spontaneously beating embryonic hearts by imaging open-chested embryos in vivo and ex vivo. Signals were augmented in embryos by mating mice homozygous for GCaMP2, with one parent also expressing tTA, resulting in embryos with two functional GCaMP2 alleles and markedly augmented transgene expression. Ca2+-dependent fluorescent signals were robust across the surface of the tubular, unseptated heart beginning at embryonic day (e.d.) 10, shortly after regular contractions are initiated, a period in which only limited ex vivo optical measurements have been attempted (33, 34). We were particularly interested in understanding the mechanism of atrioventricular (AV) delay and the timing of development of a functional AV node. As shown in Fig. 5a, prominent Ca2+ waveforms initiated in the atria of spontaneously beating embryonic hearts were rapidly conducted across the atrial surface. A dramatic slowing of the conducted Ca2+ wave occurred in the region of the AV canal, which separates the common atrial and ventricular chambers (Fig. 5 a and b and Movie 3, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site). Ca2+ waves exiting from the AV canal region continued along the ventricular surface; rapid conduction occurred through the ventricle, indicating a functional connection of the AV conduction pathway to the His/Purkinje system, consistent with histological (35) and electrophysiological (33, 34) data. The rate of conduction through the AV canal was ≈10-fold slower than through the atrial and ventricular chambers, effectively delaying connection to the ventricular conduction pathway, because ventricular breakthrough occurred after transmission of the signal through the AV canal (Fig. 5c), providing a sufficient delay for effective mechanical pumping. At e.d. 10.5, the atria could be efficiently paced from the ventricles, and bidirectional conduction was observed through the AV canal (data not shown). A distinct surface pathway has been anatomically identified in the embryonic mouse heart and hypothesized to mediate AV conduction before formation of a functional AV node (35); and a similar region of slowed cardiac conduction has been documented in the chick heart (36) but has not previously been demonstrated in mammals. Cells in this tissue layer display a distinct genetic pattern (37) and are eliminated by programmed cell death by e.d. 13.5 in the mouse (35). Consistent with the timing of elimination of these cells, we observed a loss of surface conduction through the AV canal at e.d. 13.5 (Fig. 5d); surface conduction of the Ca2+ waves ends at a discrete ring and does not travel continuously along the ventricular wall (see also Movie 4, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site) but emerges at the apical ventricular surface after a slight distinct delay. Similarly, pacing of embryonic hearts from the ventricles did not result in retrograde conduction into the atria (data not shown), indicating development of effective unidirectional conduction. These data indicate the presence of an AV conduction pathway that connects to both ventricular myocardium and the developing conduction system, demonstrating the important functional role of AV canal conduction in the preseptated heart and lending functional support to the importance of AV canal developmental abnormalities in fetal and adult arrhythmias. Given the difficulty in loading the heart without perfusion and the relatively slow spontaneous embryonic heart rate, ccGC2 mice will be particularly useful for the study of cardiac organogenesis.
Conclusions
We have demonstrated the use of a genetically encoded, high-signal Ca2+ indicator to monitor cellular Ca2+ signaling events in vivo and in vitro in the intact heart. The genetic Ca2+ sensor displays a relatively high signal over the physiological operating range of free [Ca2+]i in the working heart, and interactions between endogenous proteins and the sensor domains of GCaMP2, which may underlie the marked discrepancy observed in the signal range of genetic indicators between transfected cells and transgenic mice (19, 20), do not seem to affect sensor function. The rapidly beating mouse heart represents perhaps the most challenging context for the use of an optical probe, because the requirement for high bandwidth measurements limits signal acquisition and the very short cardiac cycle length is on the order of magnitude of the fluorescent decay constant. Nonetheless, the reproducibility and high fidelity of signals obtained in ccGC2 mice at heart rates in excess of 300/min provide confidence that genetically encoded sensors will enable the measurement of Ca2+ and other cellular signals in virtually any mammalian organ system for which optical access can be obtained, providing a markedly expanded window of observations of physiological and pathophysiological cellular processes.
Materials and Methods
Generation of Tet-Off αMHC-CaMP2 Mice.
The αMHC fragment containing seven tetO sequences (28) was ligated to a GCaMP2 BglII/NotI digestion product to αMHC-GCamP2. The 7,831-bp transgene was excised with NotI, gel purified, and injected into oocytes using standard techniques. Animals were genotyped by using primers for eGFP (18). Three lines were bred to tTA-αMHC mice to produce double transgenic mice. Transgene suppression was examined by addition of dox (1 mg/ml) in 2% sucrose in drinking water. Immunocytochemical methods were as described (38).
Ca2+-GCaMP2-Binding Kinetics.
Fluorescence association and dissociation was monitored in a stop-flow spectrofluorometer (Applied PhotoPhysics, Surrey, UK). Mouse hearts (2 ml volume) were suspended in 8 ml of buffer (200 mM sucrose/20 mM histidine, pH 7.2), homogenized with a Teflon glass homogenizer, and centrifuged at 2,000 × g for 20 min. Aliquots of Ca-EGTA-buffered solutions were added to the supernatant to clamp free Ca2+ at the desired level (39).
Optical Mapping.
Hearts were perfused and suspended in a custom-designed optical chamber (32). Di-4-ANNEPS and Rhod2 loading, photodiode array mapping, restitution protocols, and analysis were as described (40). GCaMP2 was excited at 488 nm, and di-4-ANEPPS and Rhod-2 were excited at 530 nm. Emission was collected at >520 nm for eGFP, >610 nm for di-4-ANEPPS, and 585 nm for Rhod-2. Activation maps that included both the atria and ventricles (100 × 100 pixels) were captured with a CMOS camera (Micam Ultima; SciMedia, Irvine, CA) at ≥1 kHz. In vivo images were obtained by using a cooled charge-coupled device (CCD) camera (iXon; Andor Technology, South Windsor, CT) and acquired at 66 or 128 frames per s.
In Vivo Imaging.
Mice were time-mated, and embryos removed at the designated period of development by dissection from the uterus. Embryos were kept on ice until studied at 37°C in Tyrode’s solution (136 mM NaCl/5.4 mM KCl/1 mM MgCl2/0.33 mM NaH2PO4/2.5 mM CaCl2/10 mM Hepes/10 mM glucose, pH 7.4) and imaged using a dissecting microscope (MSFLIII; Leica Microsystems, Heerbrug, Switzerland) and intensified charge-coupled device camera (iXon 860-BI; Andor Technology). Data were analyzed and processed by using customized matlab, imagej, or idl routines. Color-coded images were normalized on a pixel-by-pixel basis throughout the series, setting the highest value to the maximum value, the lowest value to 0, and linearly scaling other values. Neonatal and adult mice were anesthetized with isofluorane and cannulated via tracheotomy. Positive pressure ventilation was initiated, and the chest was opened to expose the heart. Animals were maintained at 37°C with a heating pad, and ventilation frequency and tidal volume were adjusted to eliminate spontaneous breathing. The ventilator was briefly halted during image capture.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Warren Zipfel, Mark Rishniw, and Geoffrey Eddlestone for helpful advice and Pat Fisher for immunocytochemistry. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants HL45239, DK65992, and DK58795 (to M.I.K.) and HL69097, HL70722, and HL057929 (to G.S.), and a grant-in-aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (to J.N.).
Abbreviations
- αMHC
α myosin heavy chain
- cpGFP
circularly permutated GFP
- AV
atrioventricular
- e.d.
embryonic day
- tTA
tetracycline transactivator allele
- iso
isoproterenol
- dox
doxycycline
- ccGC2
ccGCaMP2+/tTA+.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest statement: No conflicts declared.
This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.
Data deposition: The sequence reported in this paper has been deposited in the GenBank database (accession no. DQ381402).
References
- 1.Berridge M. J., Irvine R. F. Nature. 1984;312:315–321. doi: 10.1038/312315a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tsien R. W., Tsien R. Y. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 1990;6:715–760. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.06.110190.003435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bootman M. D., Berridge M. J. Cell. 1995;83:675–678. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90179-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Clapham D. E. Cell. 1995;80:259–268. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90408-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Berridge M. J., Bootman M. D., Lipp P. Nature. 1998;395:645–648. doi: 10.1038/27094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Grynkiewicz G., Poenie M., Tsien R. Y. J. Biol. Chem. 1985;260:3440–3450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhang J., Campbell R. E., Ting A. Y., Tsien R. Y. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002;3:906–918. doi: 10.1038/nrm976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Miyawaki A., Llopis J., Heim R., McCaffery J. M., Adams J. A., Ikura M., Tsien R. Y. Nature. 1997;388:882–887. doi: 10.1038/42264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Miyawaki A., Griesbeck O., Heim R., Tsien R. Y. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96:2135–2140. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.5.2135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Baird G. S., Zacharias D. A., Tsien R. Y. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96:11241–11246. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.20.11241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nakai J., Ohkura M., Imoto K. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001;19:137–141. doi: 10.1038/84397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nagai T., Sawano A., Park E. S., Miyawaki A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2001;98:3197–3202. doi: 10.1073/pnas.051636098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Heim N., Griesbeck O. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:14280–14286. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M312751200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kerr R., Lev-Ram V., Baird G., Vincent P., Tsien R. Y., Schafer W. R. Neuron. 2000;26:583–594. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81196-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Higashijima S. I., Masino M. A., Mandel G., Fetcho J. R. J. Neurophysiol. 2003;90:3986–3997. doi: 10.1152/jn.00576.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fiala A., Spall T. Sci. STKE. 2003 Mar 18; doi: 10.1126/stke.2003.174.pl6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang J. W., Wong A. M., Flores J., Vosshall L. B., Axel R. Cell. 2003;112:271–282. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00004-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ji G., Feldman M., Deng K. Y., Greene K. S., Wilson J., Lee J., Johnston R., Rishniw M., Tallini Y., Zhang J., et al. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:21461–21468. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M401084200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hasan M. T., Friedrich R. W., Euler T., Larkum M. E., Giese G., Both M., Duebel J., Waters J., Bujard H., Griesbeck O., et al. PLoS. Biol. 2004;2:763–775. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nagai T., Yamada S., Tominaga T., Ichikawa M., Miyawaki A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:10554–10559. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400417101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pologruto T. A., Yasuda R., Svoboda K. J. Neurosci. 2004;24:9572–9579. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2854-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Griesbeck O., Baird G. S., Campbell R. E., Zacharias D. A., Tsien R. Y. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:29188–29194. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M102815200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Reiff D. F., Ihring A., Guerrero G., Isacoff E. Y., Joesch M., Nakai J., Borst A. J. Neurosci. 2005;25:4766–4778. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4900-04.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Siemering K. R., Golbik R., Sever R., Haseloff J. Curr. Biol. 1996;6:1653–1663. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)70789-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zacharias D. A., Violin J. D., Newton A. C., Tsien R. Y. Science. 2002;296:913–916. doi: 10.1126/science.1068539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ohkura M., Matsuzaki M., Kasai H., Imoto K., Nakai J. Anal. Chem. 2005;77:5861–5869. doi: 10.1021/ac0506837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Diez-Garcia J., Matsushita S., Mutoh H., Nakai J., Ohkura M., Yokoyama J., Dimitrov D., Knopfel T. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2005;22:627–635. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04250.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sanbe A., Gulick J., Hanks M. C., Liang Q., Osinska H., Robbins J. Circ. Res. 2003;92:609–616. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000065442.64694.9F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Waldo K. L., Kumiski D. H., Wallis K. T., Stadt H. A., Hutson M. R., Platt D. H., Kirby M. L. Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 2001;128:3179–3188. doi: 10.1242/dev.128.16.3179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Colomer J. M., Terasawa M., Means A. R. Endocrinology. 2004;145:1356–1366. doi: 10.1210/en.2003-1119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Loew L. M., Cohen L. B., Dix J., Fluhler E. N., Montana V., Salama G., Jian-young W. J. Membr. Biol. 1992;130:1–10. doi: 10.1007/BF00233734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Baker L. C., London B., Choi B. R., Koren G., Salama G. Circ. Res. 2000;86:396–407. doi: 10.1161/01.res.86.4.396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rentschler S., Vaidya D. M., Tamaddon H., Degenhardt K., Sassoon D., Morley G. E., Jalife J., Fishman G. I. Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 2001;128:1785–1792. doi: 10.1242/dev.128.10.1785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Rothenberg F., Nikolski V. P., Watanabe M., Efimov I. R. Am. J. Physiol Heart Circ. Physiol. 2005;288:H344–H351. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00770.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Viragh S., Challice C. E. Dev. Biol. 1977;56:382–396. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(77)90278-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.de Jong F., Opthof T., Wilde A. A., Janse M. J., Charles R., Lamers W. H., Moorman A. F. Circ. Res. 1992;71:240–250. doi: 10.1161/01.res.71.2.240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Franco D., Lamers W. H., Moorman A. F. Cardiovasc. Res. 1998;38:25–53. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(97)00321-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Xin H. B., Deng K. Y., Rishniw M., Ji G., Kotlikoff M. I. Physiol. Genomics. 2002;10:211–215. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00054.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bers D. M., Patton C. W., Nuccitelli R. Methods Cell Biol. 1994;40:3–29. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)61108-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Baker L. C., Wolk R., Choi B. R., Watkins S., Plan P., Shah A., Salama G. Am. J. Physiol Heart Circ. Physiol. 2004;287:H1771–H1779. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00234.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.