Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 25;168(4):1476–1489. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00450

Table I. Comparison of salinity-induced growth response models between subpopulations.

The mean growth response was calculated for each subpopulation and fitted to a decreasing logistic curve. Aromatic accessions were omitted due to low n. Subpopulations with the same letter indicate no significant differences (P < 10–4). Asym, Horizontal asymptote; xmid, value of x at the inflection point of the curve; scal, rate coefficient; AIC, Akaike Information Criterion; BIC, Bayesian Information Criterion; TeJ, temperate japonica; TrJ, tropical japonica.

Subpopulation Asym xmid scal AIC BIC logLik P > 10−4
Admix 0.997 32.4 −6.66 −3,560.161 −3,536.05 1,785.08 A
Aus 0.999 28.9 −4.82 −4,015.505 −3,991.30 2,012.75 A, B
Indica 0.979 30.0 −5.14 −5,152.778 −5,126.87 2,581.39 A
TeJ 0.982 28.7 −4.21 −6,093.456 −6,066.51 3,051.73 B
TrJ 0.983 30.8 −4.49 −5,465.48 −5,439.12 2,737.74