PEP 561 – Distributing and Packaging Type Information
- Author:
- Ethan Smith <ethan at ethanhs.me>
- Status:
- Final
- Type:
- Standards Track
- Topic:
- Packaging, Typing
- Created:
- 09-Sep-2017
- Python-Version:
- 3.7
- Post-History:
- 10-Sep-2017, 12-Sep-2017, 06-Oct-2017, 26-Oct-2017, 12-Apr-2018
Abstract
PEP 484 introduced type hinting to Python, with goals of making typing gradual and easy to adopt. Currently, typing information must be distributed manually. This PEP provides a standardized means to leverage existing tooling to package and distribute type information with minimal work and an ordering for type checkers to resolve modules and collect this information for type checking.
Rationale
Currently, package authors wish to distribute code that has inline type
information. Additionally, maintainers would like to distribute stub files
to keep Python 2 compatibility while using newer annotation syntax. However,
there is no standard method to distribute packages with type information.
Also, if one wished to ship stub files privately the only method available
would be via setting MYPYPATH
or the equivalent to manually point to
stubs. If the package can be released publicly, it can be added to
typeshed [1]. However, this does not scale and becomes a burden on the
maintainers of typeshed. In addition, it ties bug fixes in stubs to releases
of the tool using typeshed.
PEP 484 has a brief section on distributing typing information. In this
section
the PEP recommends using shared/typehints/pythonX.Y/
for
shipping stub files. However, manually adding a path to stub files for each
third party library does not scale. The simplest approach people have taken
is to add site-packages
to their MYPYPATH
, but this causes type
checkers to fail on packages that are highly dynamic (e.g. sqlalchemy
and Django).
Definition of Terms
The definition of “MAY”, “MUST”, and “SHOULD”, and “SHOULD NOT” are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119.
“inline” - the types are part of the runtime code using PEP 526 and
PEP 3107 syntax (the filename ends in .py
).
“stubs” - files containing only type information, empty of runtime code
(the filename ends in .pyi
).
“Distributions” are the packaged files which are used to publish and distribute a release. (PEP 426)
“Module” a file containing Python runtime code or stubbed type information.
“Package” a directory or directories that namespace Python modules. (Note the distinction between packages and distributions. While most distributions are named after the one package they install, some distributions install multiple packages.)
Specification
There are several motivations and methods of supporting typing in a package. This PEP recognizes three types of packages that users of typing wish to create:
- The package maintainer would like to add type information inline.
- The package maintainer would like to add type information via stubs.
- A third party or package maintainer would like to share stub files for a package, but the maintainer does not want to include them in the source of the package.
This PEP aims to support all three scenarios and make them simple to add to packaging and deployment.
The two major parts of this specification are the packaging specifications
and the resolution order for resolving module type information. The type
checking spec is meant to replace the shared/typehints/pythonX.Y/
spec of PEP 484.
New third party stub libraries SHOULD distribute stubs via the third party packaging methods proposed in this PEP in place of being added to typeshed. Typeshed will remain in use, but if maintainers are found, third party stubs in typeshed MAY be split into their own package.
Packaging Type Information
In order to make packaging and distributing type information as simple and easy as possible, packaging and distribution is done through existing frameworks.
Package maintainers who wish to support type checking of their code MUST add
a marker file named py.typed
to their package supporting typing. This marker applies
recursively: if a top-level package includes it, all its sub-packages MUST support
type checking as well. To have this file installed with the package,
maintainers can use existing packaging options such as package_data
in
distutils, shown below.
Distutils option example:
setup(
...,
package_data = {
'foopkg': ['py.typed'],
},
...,
)
For namespace packages (see PEP 420), the py.typed
file should be in the
submodules of the namespace, to avoid conflicts and for clarity.
This PEP does not support distributing typing information as part of module-only distributions or single-file modules within namespace packages.
The single-file module should be refactored into a package and indicate that the package supports typing as described above.
Stub-only Packages
For package maintainers wishing to ship stub files containing all of their
type information, it is preferred that the *.pyi
stubs are alongside the
corresponding *.py
files. However, the stubs can also be put in a separate
package and distributed separately. Third parties can also find this method
useful if they wish to distribute stub files. The name of the stub package
MUST follow the scheme foopkg-stubs
for type stubs for the package named
foopkg
. Note that for stub-only packages adding a py.typed
marker is not
needed since the name *-stubs
is enough to indicate it is a source of typing
information.
Third parties seeking to distribute stub files are encouraged to contact the maintainer of the package about distribution alongside the package. If the maintainer does not wish to maintain or package stub files or type information inline, then a third party stub-only package can be created.
In addition, stub-only distributions SHOULD indicate which version(s)
of the runtime package are supported by indicating the runtime distribution’s
version(s) through normal dependency data. For example, the
stub package flyingcircus-stubs
can indicate the versions of the
runtime flyingcircus
distribution it supports through install_requires
in distutils-based tools, or the equivalent in other packaging tools. Note that
in pip 9.0, if you update flyingcircus-stubs
, it will update
flyingcircus
. In pip 9.0, you can use the
--upgrade-strategy=only-if-needed
flag. In pip 10.0 this is the default
behavior.
For namespace packages (see PEP 420), stub-only packages should
use the -stubs
suffix on only the root namespace package.
All stub-only namespace packages should omit __init__.pyi
files. py.typed
marker files are not necessary for stub-only packages, but similarly
to packages with inline types, if used, they should be in submodules of the namespace to
avoid conflicts and for clarity.
For example, if the pentagon
and hexagon
are separate distributions
installing within the namespace package shapes.polygons
The corresponding types-only distributions should produce packages
laid out as follows:
shapes-stubs
└── polygons
└── pentagon
└── __init__.pyi
shapes-stubs
└── polygons
└── hexagon
└── __init__.pyi
Type Checker Module Resolution Order
The following is the order in which type checkers supporting this PEP SHOULD resolve modules containing type information:
- Stubs or Python source manually put in the beginning of the path. Type
checkers SHOULD provide this to allow the user complete control of which
stubs to use, and to patch broken stubs/inline types from packages.
In mypy the
$MYPYPATH
environment variable can be used for this. - User code - the files the type checker is running on.
- Stub packages - these packages SHOULD supersede any installed inline
package. They can be found at
foopkg-stubs
for packagefoopkg
. - Packages with a
py.typed
marker file - if there is nothing overriding the installed package, and it opts into type checking, the types bundled with the package SHOULD be used (be they in.pyi
type stub files or inline in.py
files). - Typeshed (if used) - Provides the stdlib types and several third party libraries.
If typecheckers identify a stub-only namespace package without the desired module
in step 3, they should continue to step 4/5. Typecheckers should identify namespace packages
by the absence of __init__.pyi
. This allows different subpackages to
independently opt for inline vs stub-only.
Type checkers that check a different Python version than the version they run
on MUST find the type information in the site-packages
/dist-packages
of that Python version. This can be queried e.g.
pythonX.Y -c 'import site; print(site.getsitepackages())'
. It is also recommended
that the type checker allow for the user to point to a particular Python
binary, in case it is not in the path.
Partial Stub Packages
Many stub packages will only have part of the type interface for libraries completed, especially initially. For the benefit of type checking and code editors, packages can be “partial”. This means modules not found in the stub package SHOULD be searched for in parts four and five of the module resolution order above, namely inline packages and typeshed.
Type checkers should merge the stub package and runtime package or typeshed
directories. This can be thought of as the functional equivalent of copying the
stub package into the same directory as the corresponding runtime package or
typeshed folder and type checking the combined directory structure. Thus type
checkers MUST maintain the normal resolution order of checking *.pyi
before
*.py
files.
If a stub package distribution is partial it MUST include partial\n
in a
py.typed
file. For stub-packages distributing within a namespace
package (see PEP 420), the py.typed
file should be in the
submodules of the namespace.
Type checkers should treat namespace packages within stub-packages as
incomplete since multiple distributions may populate them.
Regular packages within namespace packages in stub-package distributions
are considered complete unless a py.typed
with partial\n
is included.
Implementation
The proposed scheme of indicating support for typing is completely backwards compatible, and requires no modification to package tooling. A sample package with inline types is available [typed_package], as well as a [stub_package]. A sample package checker [pkg_checker] which reads the metadata of installed packages and reports on their status as either not typed, inline typed, or a stub package.
The mypy type checker has an implementation of PEP 561 searching which can be read about in the mypy docs [4].
[numpy-stubs] is an example of a real stub-only package for the numpy distribution.
Acknowledgements
This PEP would not have been possible without the ideas, feedback, and support of Ivan Levkivskyi, Jelle Zijlstra, Alyssa Coghlan, Daniel F Moisset, Andrey Vlasovskikh, Nathaniel Smith, and Guido van Rossum.
Version History
- 2023-01-13
- Clarify that the 4th step of the Module Resolution Order applies
to any package with a
py.typed
marker file (and not just inline packages).
- Clarify that the 4th step of the Module Resolution Order applies
to any package with a
- 2021-09-20
- Clarify expectations and typechecker behavior for stub-only namespace packages
- Clarify handling of single-file modules within namespace packages.
- 2018-07-09
- Add links to sample stub-only packages
- 2018-06-19
- Partial stub packages can look at typeshed as well as runtime packages
- 2018-05-15
- Add partial stub package spec.
- 2018-04-09
- Add reference to mypy implementation
- Clarify stub package priority.
- 2018-02-02
- Change stub-only package suffix to be -stubs not _stubs.
- Note that py.typed is not needed for stub-only packages.
- Add note about pip and upgrading stub packages.
- 2017-11-12
- Rewritten to use existing tooling only
- No need to indicate kind of type information in metadata
- Name of marker file changed from
.typeinfo
topy.typed
- 2017-11-10
- Specification re-written to use package metadata instead of distribution metadata.
- Removed stub-only packages and merged into third party packages spec.
- Removed suggestion for typecheckers to consider checking runtime versions
- Implementations updated to reflect PEP changes.
- 2017-10-26
- Added implementation references.
- Added acknowledgements and version history.
- 2017-10-06
- Rewritten to use .distinfo/METADATA over a distutils specific command.
- Clarify versioning of third party stub packages.
- 2017-09-11
- Added information about current solutions and typeshed.
- Clarify rationale.
References
Copyright
This document has been placed in the public domain.
Source: https://github.com/python/peps/blob/main/peps/pep-0561.rst
Last modified: 2024-06-05 15:44:49 GMT