WO1993006459A1

WO1993006459A1 - Dual-wavelength photometer and fiber optic sensor probe

Info

Publication number: WO1993006459A1
Application number: PCT/US1992/007883
Authority: WO
Inventors: Marc D. Porter; Thomas P. Jones
Original assignee: Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc.
Priority date: 1991-09-18
Filing date: 1992-09-17
Publication date: 1993-04-01
Also published as: US5307146A; JPH06511082A; CA2116786C; EP0604582A1; EP0604582A4

Abstract

A dual wavelength optical sensor for measuring the optical characteristics of sensing films which are responsive to a particular quantity to be measured. The optical sensor includes a light source (16, 18) for producing light outputs at two distinct wavelengths and transmitting twin components of light to first and second outputs. A time-shared optical fiber (26) receives the two distinct wavelengths of light from the first output and carries the light on a time-shared basis to a sensor probe (14). A sample detector (30) receives the two distinct wavelengths of light transmitted from the thin sensing film. A reference detector (34) receives the two distinct wavelengths of light from the second output and monitors the output intensity of the light source. A signal processing system (35) combines the measurements of the optical characteristics of the thin sensing film in response to each of the two distinct wavelengths to provide measurements which account for changes in the optical properties of the thin sensing film.

Description

DUAL-WAVELENGTH PHOTOMETER AND FIBER OPTIC SENSOR PROBE

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to optical sensors, and more particularly, to optical sensors used to measure the optical properties of thin sensing films which are responsive to particular physical quantities to be measured.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Thin film optical sensors have been used based on an optical sensor measuring changes in a thin sensing film for detecting and measuring physical quantities such as pH, metal-ion, and toxic gas levels. While different optical sensors exist, certain optical sensors include the use of a photometer, which is a device used to measure the optical properties of a thin film which is responsive to a particular physical characteristic or quantity to be measured. For example, the thin film can be responsive to pH, and changes in the optical properties of the film resulting from changes in the pH level are measured by the photometer whose output is calibrated in terms of pH.

Important application areas for such sensors can be found in environmental and clinical applications where there is a need for reliable, low-cost and portable sensors. However, due at least in part to the complexities of realizing analytical instrumentation to meet the demands of the above applications, the foregoing need has not been adequately satisfied. Indeed, only few reports describing such instrumentation have appeared, such as R. Smardzews i, "Multi-Element Optical Waveguide Sensor: General Concept and Design¹¹, Talanta, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 95-101 (1988), and A. Guthrie et al. , "Solid-State Instrumentation For Use With Optical-Fibre Chemical- Sensors", Talanta, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 157-159 (1988).

An important focus of the prior attempts has been the provision of low-cost, solid state components for the optical sensor portion of the instrument, which have included the use of light emitting diodes (LEDs) as light sources and photodiodes as detectors. The LED has an additional advantage of producing light at only single defined wavelengths although at variable intensities. In the Smardzewski article cited above, for example, a multi- element optical waveguide sensor for detection and identification of gaseous or liquid mixtures was disclosed. For each component or element to be detected and measured, an optical waveguide such as a cylindrical glass capillary tube was provided. Each optical waveguide was externally coated with a thin film known to react specifically with the particular element to be detected. An LED was then attached to each waveguide, and each waveguide was fiber-coupled to a single photodetector, so that the photodetector provided an output indicative of the level of the element being detected. As is apparent, this sensor operated in a single-wavelength mode, i.e., a single LED provided a light output at a particular wavelength for each waveguide. However, optical sensors such as these which operate in a single-wavelength mode experience calibration problems, due in part to variations in the LED output intensity due to time, temperature, and life of the LEDs, and the degradation of the sensing films. As would be expected, these calibration problems lead to inaccuracy and instability in the sensor response.

In addition to optical sensors utilizing single- wavelength mode operation, two-wavelength schemes have been developed. For example, in the Guthrie et al. article cited above, a two-wavelength scheme was employed. There, an optical fiber pH sensor was incorporated with a solid state instrument including two LEDs and a photodiode detector. One LED provided a measuring wavelength, while the second LED provided a near-infrared "reference wavelength". The respective wavelengths of light were transmitted to a sensor probe on separate optical fibers and the signal intensity was measured at each wavelength by the single detector. Because the light emitted at the reference wavelength was not absorbed by the indicator reagent of the sensor probe, the reflected light intensity at the reference wavelength was independent of indicator state. The signal intensities at the measuring and reference wavelengths were then divided in order to provide a measurement dependent only on the indicator state. Thus, the reference wavelength was utilized to compensate for changes in the signal intensity due to non- chemical causes, such as fiber-bending intensity losses or intensity changes at the fiber connections. However, similar to single-wavelength mode sensors, this two- wavelength device used two completely independent optical sources for illuminating the sensor, and did not compensate for variations in the LED output intensities due to time, temperature, and life of the LEDs, or for variations due to degradation of the sensing film.

In addition to light source output fluctuations, the optical properties of the thin sensing films such as the concentration of the indicator, and the ability of the films to sense the measured physical quantities can change over time resulting in degradation of the sensing films, which further contributes to long-range stability problems. Attempts have been made to combat the long-term stability problems with respect to the optical characteristics of thin sensing films by, for example, regenerating the reagent associated with the film, using controlled release films, and the like. However, none of these techniques have provided optical sensing devices with the desired long-term stability and minimal recalibration requirements.

Another problem not fully addressed by prior developments is that many of the targeted applications demand extreme miniaturization of both the optical and electrical components of the optical sensors. Furthermore, in instances where implantation into a biological host is required, biocompatibility of the optical sensor components is of considerable importance. Thus, as is apparent, the development of reliable, low- cost, and long-term optical sensors for environmental and clinical applications has not yet been achieved by the previous developments discussed above.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In view of the foregoing, it is a general aim of the present invention is to provide an optical sensor which is not only reliable, but which maintains long-term calibration far longer than sensors proposed in the past. In accomplishing that aim, it is a primary object of the present invention to provide an optical sensor which has long-term stability and requires no recalibration after initial setup.

In that regard, it is another object of the present invention to provide an optical sensor which compensates for variations in the light source output intensities which cause instability and calibration problems.

It is a related object of the present invention to provide an optical sensor which also compensates and accounts for changes in the optical properties of the thin sensing films such as changes in the indicator concentration, or the ability of the films to sense the measured physical quantities, which contribute to the instability of the sensor response. It is still another object of the present invention to provide an optical sensor which can be used in applications where the sensor probe of the optical sensor is inaccessible for recalibration or regeneration, such as in a biological host or underground. It is a feature of the optical sensor of the present invention that two distinct wavelengths of light are sequentially transmitted to a thin film sensor probe through a single optical fiber on a time-shared basis.

It is another feature of the optical sensor of the present invention that, in its preferred embodiment, the thin film sensor probe employs a graded index lens to couple light efficiently between the single optical fiber and a collection fiber.

It is yet another feature of the optical sensor of the present invention that a reference detector is utilized which continually monitors the output intensity of the light sources as they are sequentially transmitted to the sensor probe in order to provide continuous compensation to a sample detector with respect to fluctuations in output intensity of the light sources. It is still another feature of the optical sensor of the present invention that, in its preferred embodiment, a beam splitter is utilized which includes graded index optical lenses for transmitting twin components of light each including light at the two distinct wavelengths to the reference detector and the sample detector.

In accordance with the present invention, a dual wavelength optical sensor for measuring the optical characteristics of sensing films which are responsive to a particular quantity to be measured is provided. The optical sensor includes light source means for producing light outputs at two distinct wavelengths and transmitting twin components of light to first and second outputs, the twin components of light including light at each of the two distinct wavelengths. A time-shared optical fiber receives the two distinct wavelengths of light from the first output of the light source means and carries the two distinct wavelengths of light on a time-shared basis to a sensor probe. The sensor probe transmits the two distinct wavelengths of light to and from a thin sensing film associated with the sensor probe which is responsive to the quantity to be measured. Additionally, the two distinct wavelengths of light are selected so that the thin sensing film is responsive to each distinct wavelength. Detecting means receives the two distinct wavelengths of light transmitted from the thin sensing film and measures the optical characteristics of the thin sensing film in response to each of the two distinct wavelengths of light. Reference means receives the two distinct wavelengths of light from the second output of the light source means and monitors the output intensity of the light source means in order to provide continuous compensation to the detecting means with respect to fluctuations in the output intensity of the light source means. Finally, means are provided for combining the measurements of the optical characteristics of the thin sensing film in response to each of the two distinct wavelengths in order to provide measurements which account for changes in the optical properties of the thin sensing film.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIGURE IA is a block diagram of the dual wavelength optical sensor according to the present invention;

FIG. IB is a block diagram of a preferred embodiment of the dual wavelength optical sensor shown in FIG. IA;

FIG. 2A is a schematic diagram of the beam splitter of the optical sensor shown in FIG. IB; FIG. 2B is an expanded view of the optical lenses of the beam splitter shown in FIG. 2A;

FIG. 3A is a schematic diagram of the fiber optic sensor probe shown in FIGS. IA and IB;

FIG. 3B is an expanded view of the optical lens of the fiber optic sensor probe of FIG. 3A;

FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of the electronic circuitry for the sample detector and the reference detector shown in FIGS. IA and IB;

FIGS. 5A-5C are waveforms representing the light source output and detector responses;

FIGS. 6A-6B are waveforms showing the time-based responses of the sample detector and the reference detector, respectively, to illumination of the light sources; FIG. 6C are waveforms showing the absorbance vs. time traces at the two distinct wavelengths of light using the data from FIGS. 6A-6B;

FIGS. 7A-7B are waveforms of the absorbance time response of the thin film sensor to changes in pH at the first and second wavelengths of light, respectively;

FIG. 8 is a graph of the absorbance as a function of pH for the thin film optical sensor of the present invention; and FIG. 9 is a calibration curve for the thin film optical sensor of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

While the invention will be described in connection with a preferred embodiment, there is no intent to limit the invention to this embodiment. On the contrary, the intent is to cover all alternatives, modifications, and equivalents included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.

Turning now to the drawings, FIG. IA is a block diagram of a dual wavelength optical sensor 10 according to the present invention. The optical sensor 10 is capable of providing a continuously calibrated measurement of the optical absorption of thin sensing films which are in turn responsive to a characteristic to be measured, such as pH, metal-ion, or toxic gas levels. In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, optical sensor 10 comprises a dual-wavelength photometer and fiber optic sensor probe. In FIG. IA, a photometer 12 measures the optical characteristics of a thin sensing film located in a fiber optic sensor probe 14, the thin sensing film, discussed later, being responsive to a particular physical characteristic or quantity to be measured. Changes in the optical characteristics of the thin sensing film of sensor probe 14 are measured by the photometer 12. Photometer 12 comprises light source means 15 which produces light outputs at two distinct wavelengths of light and transmits twin components of light to first and second outputs connected to first and second optical fibers 26 and 28. The twin components of light transmitted to the optical fibers 26 and 28 include light at each of the two distinct wavelengths. The two distinct wavelengths of light from the first output of light source means 15 are transmitted through the single optical fiber 26 to the sensor probe 14 on a time-shared basis, as discussed in greater detail below. The two distinct wavelengths of light are selected so that they are both in the range of wavelengths to which the thin sensing film responds. In other words, the thin sensing film is responsive to each of the two distinct wavelengths of light. Photometer 12 further comprises a sample detector 30 which is connected to the sensor probe 14 through a collection optical fiber 32. The sample detector 30 receives the two distinct wavelengths of light transmitted from the thin sensing film of sensor probe 14, and measures the optical characteristics of the thin sensing film, such as the optical absorption of the sensing film, in response to each of the two wavelengths. Photometer 12 also includes a reference detector 34 which receives the two distinct wavelengths of light from the second output of light source means 15 through the optical fiber 28. The reference detector 34 monitors the output intensity of the light source means 15 in order to provide continuous compensation to the sample detector 30 with respect to fluctuations in the output intensity of the light source means 15. A signal processing system 35 is also provided which is operable for combining the measurements of the optical characteristics of the thin sensing film of sensor probe 14 in response to each of the two distinct wavelengths in order to provide measurements which account for changes in the optical properties of the thin sensing film, such as changes in the indicator concentration of the sensing film. Finally, the components of the photometer 12 are enclosed in a light isolation box 36 in order to minimize stray light.

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention shown in FIG. IB, light source means 15 comprise first and second light sources 16 and 18 each providing a light output at a distinct and different wavelength. Light source means 15 further comprise a beam splitter 20 which is connected to the light sources 16 and 18 via optical fibers 22 and 24. The beam splitter 20 is operable for transmitting twin components of light from light sources 16 and 18 through optical fibers 26 and 28 and to the sensor probe 14 and the reference detector 34. It should be understood, however, that the embodiment shown in FIG. IB is only a preferred embodiment, and that those skilled in the art would recognize alternative configurations for providing twin components of light to two separate outputs, with both components including light at the two distinct wavelengths.

As stated above, single wavelength optical sensors have been used in the past but tend to produce calibration problems. Additionally, two-wavelength schemes have been developed, but these two-wavelength optical devices do not compensate for variations in the light source output intensities due to time, temperature, and life of the light sources. Additionally, previous optical sensors were not able to compensate for changes in the optical properties of the thin sensing films which contribute to the instability of the sensor response. For example, changes in the optical properties of the thin sensing films such as changes in the indicator concentration of the films can result from degradation of the films over time, loss of the indicator upon immersion in the measured solutions, and varying levels of indicator concentration at the preparation of the sensing films. In accordance with the present invention, however, the dual wavelength optical sensor of the present invention is capable of compensating and accounting for both changes in the optical properties of the thin sensing film of the sensor probe 14, and for fluctuations in the output intensities of the first and second light sources 16 and 18.

An important aspect in achieving these desired results is the ability to use two wavelengths of light, both of which are compatible with (or are within the responsive range of) the thin sensing film, and to divide or chop the two wavelengths of light onto a single optical fiber connected to the sensor probe 14 on a time-shared basis. For example, if the optical properties of the thin sensing film change with time, the response to both wavelengths of light will change in a similar fashion. This allows the response for the two wavelengths to be combined in order to produce a measurement which does not change with the optical properties of the sensing film due to time or other factors. For example, a ratio can be taken of the measurement of the optical absorption of the thin sensing film at each of the two distinct wavelengths of light. By taking this ratio, a measurement can be derived which accounts for changes in the optical properties of the thin sensing film. Thus, use of the two distinct wavelengths of light provides long-term stability to the optical sensor of the present invention with respect to changing properties of the thin sensing film. As stated above, the two-wavelength light can be transmitted through the single optical fiber 26 to sensor probe 14 on a time-shared basis. This time-sharing of a single optical fiber for two distinct wavelengths of light is accomplished with the use of the two light sources 16 and 18, which are electronically modulated or switched at a predetermined frequency in order to transmit the two- wavelength light through the optical fiber 26 on a time- shared basis. By operating in this manner, the dual wavelength photometer of the present invention does not require the use of mechanically moving parts, thus enhancing the mechanical durability of the optical sensor. However, the use of a two-wavelength approach can produce electronic stability problems, relating primarily to the output of the light sources 16 and 18 operated in a modulated or switched mode. For example, the light output can change as the light sources are switched on and off for essentially the same input current, and/or the light source temperatures can increase or vary as the light sources are switched on and off. To accommodate for this problem, the dual wavelength optical sensor of the present invention includes the use of the reference detector 34 which monitors the light output of the first and second light sources 16 and 18 in order to provide continuous compensation to the sample detector 30 with respect to fluctuations in the output intensity of the light sources. For example, this continuous compensation can be provided by dividing the optical absorption measurement of the thin sensing film at each distinct wavelength of light by the reference detector 34 measurement at the same distinct wavelength. This quotient provides a measurement which is independent of fluctuations in the output intensities of the light sources. Thus, by compensating for these light source fluctuations, reference detector 34 allows the effective use of the two-wavelength approach, which in turn allows the optical sensor of the present invention to provide measurements which account for changes in the optical properties of the thin sensing film.

By compensating for these problems, the present invention provides an optical sensor such as a pH sensor which has long-term stability and no recalibration requirements. The optical sensor of the present invention can be put in place such as underground or in the body of a biological host for long periods of time and will produce reliable readings calibrated to a known standard for that lengthy interval.

In a practical implementation of the present invention, green and red light emitting diodes (LEDs) were utilized as the first and second light sources 16 and 18. The two LEDs 16 and 18 were polished to flatness successively with 32, 15, and 3 μm abrasive sheets. Polishing provides a smooth and flat surface near the emitting element, thereby enhancing light collection by the optical fibers 22 and 24. The green and red LEDs 16 and 18 have emission maxima (i.e., operating wavelengths) of about 565 and 635 nm, respectively, and bandwidths (at half-height) of about 35 and 40 nm, respectively, so that there is no overlap between the operating wavelengths of the two light sources.

In one practical implementation, the fiber optics used for optical fibers 22, 24, 26, 28 and 32 had a 400 μm core diameter and a 15 μm thick polymer cladding. Suitable fiber optics of this type are Model No. HCR-

M0400T-06, from Ensign-Bickford Optics Co. of Avon, CT.

The optical fibers were also polished successively with

32, 15, 3, and 0.3 μm abrasive sheets. A 1 cm portion of the protective Tefzel buffer was removed from the fibers at the ends which connect to beam splitter 20 and sensor probe 14, and the fibers were cemented in place with epoxy. The ends of the fibers which connect to the light sources 16 and 18 and to the detectors 30 and 34 were cemented in place with epoxy without removal of the protective buffer.

Referring again to the drawings, FIG. 2A is a schematic diagram of the beam splitter 20 of photometer 12 shown in FIG. IB. In the preferred embodiment, the beam splitter 20 includes a pair of graded-index (GRIN) lenses 38 placed end-to-end, with a beam-splitting, partially reflective metal film 40 deposited on an end of one of the

GRIN lenses 38 at the interface of the two lenses 38. A

17 nm chromium film is utilized as metal film 40. The beam splitter 20 is operable for transmitting twin components of light from the LEDs 16 and 18 between the reference detector 34 and the sample detector 30 (via the sensor probe 14) . The GRIN lenses 38 are enclosed in a cylindrical brass housing 42, and held end-to-end by Delrin end caps 44 and 46 which properly position the fiber optics for coupling the two-wavelength light between the respective optical fibers. As shown in FIG. 2A, optical fiber 22 from LED 16 and optical fiber 28 are positioned within cap 44, and optical fiber 24 from LED 18 and optical fiber 26 to sensor probe 14 are positioned within cap 46.

In a practical implementation of the present invention, the beam splitter 20 was constructed from 2.0 mm diameter Selfoc GRIN lenses, Model No. SLW-2.0, from NSG America, Somerset, NJ. The GRIN lenses 38 were 5.11 mm in length and 2.0 mm in diameter. The GRIN lenses 38 were held end-to-end in a cylindrical brass housing with dimensions of 2.5 cm in diameter by 2.3 cm in length.

FIG. 2B is an expanded view of GRIN lenses 38 of beam splitter 20 and demonstrates the light propagation path within GRIN lenses 38. The upper and lower diagrams of FIG. 2B demonstrate how beam splitter 20 transmits twin components of the light from LED 16 and LED 18 respectively, to reference detector 34 and sensor probe 14. As shown in the upper view of FIG. 2B, arrow 48 represents light from LED 16 which travels through optical fiber 22 and into GRIN lenses 38. As can be seen, a portion of the light reflects off of metal film 40 and back to fiber 28, while a portion of light travels through the metal film 40 and into optical fiber 26. Thus, arrow 50 represents the light transmitted to sensor probe 14, and arrow 52 represents the light transmitted to reference detector 34. In a similar fashion, the lower view of FIG. 2B demonstrates how beam splitter 20 divides the light from LED 18. Arrow 54 represents the light output of LED 18 which enters GRIN lenses 38 through optical fiber 24. Due to the partially reflective metal film 40, light from LED 18 is transmitted to the reference detector 34, represented as arrow 52, and to the sensor probe 14, represented as arrow 50. The splitting ratio of the beam splitter 20 was determined by the following method. An optical fiber was connected between one of the outputs of beam splitter 20 and reference detector 34, and the detector response to both wavelengths of light from LEDs 16 and 18 was measured. The fiber was then moved to the other output of beam splitter 20, and the reference detector response to both wavelengths was measured again. The ratio of the detector responses indicated that the relative amounts of transmitted and reflected light were 70% and 30%, respectively. The beam splitter 20 was oriented such that a greater amount of 565 nm light from green LED 16 entered sensor probe 14 than 635 nm light from red LED 18. Because of attenuation at 565 nm by sensor probe 14, however, the relative detector response for the two wavelengths was approximately equal at both detectors 34 and 30.

Optics based on graded-index materials offer advantages of small size and low cost, and are often used for such tasks as coupling light from a source to a fiber optic, collimating light from a fiber, and splitting light between multiple fibers. Unlike conventional lenses, which focus light by refraction at a curved surface of a material with a constant refractive index, GRIN lenses focus light via a refractive index gradient. A GRIN lens is a cylinder with flat ends, with a refractive index as a function of radial distance given by:

N(r) = N₀(l - Ar²/2) where A is a constant (units of mm^-2) , r is the radial distance (units of mm) from the axis of the lens, and N₀ is the refractive index at the axis.

The propagation of rays through a GRIN lens is such that a beam of monochromatic light originating at a point

(such as from a fiber optic) at the GRIN lens surface is periodically focused as a function of distance along the

GRIN lens axis. Meridional rays propagating through a

GRIN lens have a characteristic period of P = 2π/A¹/². Because light entering one end of a GRIN lens of length nP/2 mm (where n is an integer) is guided to a mirror- image point on the opposite face of the GRIN lens, light can be coupled with high efficiency between two fiber optics placed at the ends of the GRIN lens. Because the refractive index changes as a function of wavelength, however, the period of a lens depends on the wavelength of light.

As stated above, the fiber optic beam splitter 20 as shown in FIG. 2 was constructed with the use of GRIN lenses. Likewise, a GRIN lens (of length P/4 mm) in which the back face is coated with a mirror was used to couple light from two parallel fibers which are placed at the front face of the cylinder along the diameter at equal distances from the axis, as shown in FIG. 3B discussed below.

FIG. 3A is a diagram of the sensor probe 14 shown in FIGS. IA and IB. The sensor probe 14 includes a thin sensing film 56 which is responsive to the characteristic to be measured, and also responsive to each of the two distinct wavelengths of light. In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, thin sensing film 56 is a pH sensing film. Sensor probe 14 also includes a GRIN lens 58 which couples light from optical fiber 26 from beam splitter 20 to collection fiber 32 connected to sample detector 30. The back surface of lens 58 is coated with a reflective film 60 in order to provide the coupling of light efficiently from fiber 26 to collection fiber 32. The sensor probe 14 assembly included two Delrin plates 62, which were aligned with stainless steel guide pins 64. The guide pins 64 also provide a means to control the separation between the plates 62, providing a clear path for solution contact. The thin sensing film 56 is mounted on one of the plates 62 and held between the front surface of GRIN lens 58 and fibers 26 and 32 by a stainless steel plate 66. Additionally, plates 62 were held in place with the use of two screws 68, and epoxy 70 was used to secure the optical fibers 26 and 32 to the sensor probe 14, and to protect the reflective film 60 from degradation by solution contact.

FIG. 3B is an expanded view of the GRIN lens 58 of sensor probe 14 shown in FIG. 3A. As can be seen in FIG. 3B, the lens 58 of sensor probe 14 receives the two- wavelength light 50 from beam splitter 20 through single optical fiber 26. This two-wavelength light 50 is transmitted to and from the thin sensing film 56 which is responsive to the characteristic to be measured, such as pH. As stated above, the use of GRIN lens 58 allows efficient coupling of the light 50 from fiber 26 to collection fiber 32. As explained in greater detail below, the two-wavelength light transmitted through the collection fiber 32, represented as arrow 72, is received by sample detector 30. The sample detector 30 is operable for measuring the optical absorption of the thin sensing film 56 in response to each of the two distinct wavelengths. In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the thin sensing film 56 comprises a Congo Red pH sensor. Thus, in the preferred embodiment, sensor probe 14 is a Congo Red sensor probe, and optical sensor 10 is a Congo Red optical sensor. A Congo Red sensing film is a "two- color" indicator, and is operable for measuring pH levels across a large dynamic range (>4 pH units) which results from the polyprotic acid-base reactivity of Congo Red and the high optical absorptivity of its various ionic forms. Depending on the acidic level of the solution to be measured, the Congo Red sensor exhibits effectively two optical states in response to incident light (i.e., visible light) . For example, when the Congo Red sensor is subjected to a normal base solution, the sensor appears red in color in response to incident light. When the Congo Red sensor is subjected to a highly acidic solution, the sensor exhibits a blue color in response to incident light. However, regardless of the optical state of the sensor, the two distinct wavelengths of light from the LEDs are selected so that both wavelengths are compatible with each optical state. In other words, the Congo Red thin sensing film is responsive to both of the two distinct wavelengths of light for each optical state of the sensing film. As explained in greater detail below, this allows the optical sensor of the present invention to provide calibrated measurements across a large dynamic range of pH units which are independent of the indicator concentration of the thin sensing film.

The thin sensing film 56 was fabricated by spin- coating a 15% (w/v) solution of cellulose acetate and cyclohexanone at 2,000 rpm onto glass microscope slides. The concentration of the cellulose acetate was high enough to provide films having substantial mechanical strength. After drying for 24 hours in air, the films were hydrolyzed in 0.1 M KOH for 24 hours. Congo Red was immobilized according to a standard dye-bath recipe, and is sensitive in the pH range from 4.5 to 0.0. Thin sensing film 56 was mounted in sensor probe 14, and held in place by stainless steel plate 66 having a 1 mm thickness with a 5 mm hole to expose the pH-sensitive thin sensing film 56 to the solution to be measured.

FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of the electronic circuitry of sample detector 30 and reference detector 34. As stated previously, sample detector 30 provides a measurement of the optical absorption of thin sensing film 56 at each of the two distinct wavelengths, and reference detector 34 measures the output intensities of LEDs 16 and 18 in order to provide continuous compensation to sample detector 30 with respect to fluctuations in the output intensities of LEDs 16 and 18. In both detectors 30 and 34, a photodetector 74 is utilized, which contains a 5.0-mm² silicon photodiode 76 connected to an internally packaged low-noise pre-amplifier 78. A suitable photodetector is Model No. S529-01-5 from Devar, Inc., of Bridgeport, CT. The pre-amplifier 78 includes a resistor 80 connected between its non-inverting input and ground. Additionally, resistors 82 and 84 and a capacitor 86 are connected between the inverting input of pre-amplifier 78 and its output, and a resistor 90 is connected to ground. The output voltage from photodetector 74 is amplified by an operational amplifier 88 having adjustable gain and zero offset. A resistor 92 is connected between the output of pre-amplifier 78 and the non-inverting input of amplifier 88. Additionally, a variable resistor 94, a resistor 96, and a capacitor 98 are connected between the inverting input of amplifier 88 and its output. Finally, an A/D converter (not shown) is configured for ±10 V through a potentiometer 100, which results in a 0.3 mV resolution. The noise level of the signal (±7.5 mV) was 25 times the resolution of the A/D converter.

In order to monitor and manipulate the measurements of sample detector 30 and reference detector 34, a signal processing system 35 is utilized as shown in FIGS IA and IB. In a practical implementation of the preferred embodiment, signal processing system 35 included an 80386- based microcomputer with RTI-815 and RTI-850 data acquisition boards, produced by Analog Devices of Norwood, MA. The data acquisition boards were controlled with "Labtech Notebook" software from Laboratory Technology Corp. , of Wilmington, MA.

FIG. 5A shows the output waveforms of red LED 18 (waveform a) and green LED 16 (waveform b) in response to an applied voltage. The LEDs 16 and 18 were electronically modulated at 24 Hz through 8-bit analog output channels on the RTI-815 acquisition board. FIGS. 5B and 5C are waveforms of the responses of sample detector 30 and reference detector 34, respectively, resulting from illumination of LEDs 16 and 18. In FIGS. 5A-5C, the value of t for the time base is 1/24 seconds. Additionally, all Y-axes are in arbitrary units with the detector voltage used to indicate the lower sensitivity of detectors 30 and 34 to light at 565 nm from the green LED 16. The sample and reference detector voltages were measured with 16-bit analog input channels on the RTI-850 and represented 24 Hz square-wave functions of detector voltage comprising three stages: (1) illumination by red LED 18 as shown in waveforms b of FIGS. 5B-5C, (2) illumination by green LED 16 as shown in waveforms c of FIGS. 5B-5C, and (3) illumination by only background, with both LEDs off as shown in waveforms d of FIGS. 5B-5C. Each LED was switched on by applying a 7.8 V potential, resulting in a 20 mA current through each LED.

The absorbances of the optical sensor of the present invention at 565 and 650 nm were monitored as a function of time as sensor probe 14 was inserted into solutions of varying pH. The solutions were stirred with a magnetic stirring bar, and the sensor probe 14 was rinsed with deionized water between immersions to minimize solution carry-over. The response of optical sensor 10 was allowed to reach a constant value in each of the varying solutions. The absorbance vs. time trace was smoothed with a nine-point Savitsky-Golay smoothing algorithm. The time constant of the optical sensor 10 response was determined as the time required for 63% of the maximum response. Additionally, the pH of the solutions was controlled by varying the amounts of HC1 or KOH, and sufficient KC1 was added to adjust the ionic strength to 0.1. All solutions were prepared with deionized water.

FIGS. 6A and 6B show the amplified detector voltages of the sample and reference detectors 30 and 34, respectively, as a function of time for illumination by: (a) red LED 18, (b) green LED 16, and (c) background (LEDs off) . The traces in FIGS. 6A-6B represent a signal— average over intervals of one second (8 data-points per second) of the detector responses, which at this time base appear continuous. The periodic variations in the response of sample detector 30 in FIG. 6A are from stray light (fluorescent room lights) which enters through sensor probe 14. The subtraction of the detector background-voltage, however, compensates for variations in the background intensity. The slow increase observed in the early portion of trace (a) in FIG. 6B is due to thermal variations in the output of the red and green LEDs 18 and 16. At the initial stages of data acquisition, the current through each LED causes its temperature to increase until reaching a steady-state value. However, in accordance with the present invention, this variation is effectively compensated by measurement of the LED outputs with reference detector 34.

Because the voltages of the detector outputs are a linear function of the intensity of incident light, the absorbance of the thin sensing film 56 of sensor probe 14 at each of the two wavelengths is given by A = -log[f_s(V_Sfi - V_s#b)]/[f_r(V_rfi - V_rfb) ] © where V represents detector voltage, and f represents a proportionality constant arising from a number of factors (e.g., gain of detectors 30 and 34, splitting ratio of beam splitter 20, and light attenuation by the sensor probe 14 and fiber-optics) . The subscripts s and r refer to sample and reference detectors 30 and 34, respectively, and the subscripts i and b represent the detector-illuminated voltage and background voltage, respectively. Equation (1) can be rearranged to give A = -log[(V_{β i} - V_βFb)/(V_rfi - V_Erb)] + C 0 where C represents -log(f_s/f_r) . The sensor probe 14 was assembled without a sensing film 56, and the values of C were determined for absorbance determinations at both 635 and 565 nm. Subtraction of V_b corrected for detector dark-current, voltage offset of the operational amplifier, and stray light. The absorbance-vs.-time traces at 635 and 565 nm are shown in FIG. 6C. The absorbances were calculated by Equation (2) using the data from FIGS. 6A and 6B. The root-mean-square noise levels were ±0.002 and ±0.013 for the absorbances at 635 and 565 nm, respectively. The difference in noise level between these two wavelengths is attributed to two factors: (1) 565-nm light couples through sensor probe 14 with only about 53% of the efficiency as 630-nm light, and (2) the detector response for 565-nm light is about 30% of the response for 635-nm light. Improvements in the noise level of the absorbance measurement at 565 nm can be accomplished by utilizing detectors with a greater sensitivity to 565-nm light, and higher-intensity light sources. Additionally, an increase in the data collection rate will reduce the contribution of 1/f noise, which will result in further noise reduction.

The performance of the dual-wavelength photometer of the present invention was tested with a Congo Red thin-film sensor probe 14, which responds across a range from pH 0 to 4. The LEDs 16 and 18 were electronically modulated at 24 Hz. The absorbances at 565 and 635 nm were calculated from the detector voltages by Equation

(2) , and were displayed in real-time on a computer screen.

FIGS. 7A-7B show the response of the absorbance of the

Congo Red sensor probe 14 at 565 nm (FIG. 7A) and 635 nm (FIG. 7B) as the sensor probe 14 was inserted into solutions of differing pH. The hash marks adjacent the waveforms in FIGS. 7A-7B indicate the times at which the pH level of the measured solutions was changed, and the numerical values above or below the hash marks indicate the corresponding pH levels. As the pH of the solutions decreased, the absorbance at both 565 and 635 nm increased until they reached a limiting value. The small negative-going "spikes" at each sample change are an artifact resulting from the Savitsky-Golay smoothing algorithm. Although sensor probe 14 was rinsed with deionized water between immersions, no sensor response was observed when the sample probe was rinsed with deionized water, due to its low ionic strength. The time constant for the response of the Congo Red sensor probe 14 upon immersion in the pH standards was 10 seconds, which represents the time required for solution mixing as well as the sensor response. A preliminary stability test of the response of photometer 12 was determined over a four-hour period, during which no detectable change in absorbance was observed.

FIG. 8 shows the absorbance at 565 nm and 635 nm as a function of pH for the Congo Red sensor probe 14. The peak-to-peak noise level for the absorbance at 635 nm was ±0.001. This level of noise allows the singe-wavelength detection of changes in pH as small as 0.003 pH units. The peak-to-peak noise level for the absorbance at 565 nm was ±0.010. As noted before, the higher noise level for 565-nm light is due to the lower sensitivity of the detectors and the lower coupling efficiency of the sensor probe 14 for this wavelength.

One advantage of a "two-color" indicator (such as Congo Red) is that a calibration curve that is independent of indicator concentration can be constructed. As stated previously, changes in the indicator concentration of the thin sensing films can result from degradation of the films over time, loss of indicator upon immersion in the measured solutions, and varying levels of indicator concentration at the preparation of the thin sensing films. However, by utilizing the dual wavelength approach, the optical sensor of the present invention can realize calibration that is independent of the indicator concentration. For example, FIG. 9 shows a calibration curve for the Congo Red optical sensor 10 of the present invention, which was obtained by plotting the pH as a function of the ratio of the absorbance at 635 nm to the absorbance at 565 nm (^A ₆₃₅ ^A ₅₆₅) • Thus, the dual wavelength approach of the present invention provides an absorbance ratio that results in a calibration which is independent of indicator concentration. Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, the dual wavelength optical sensor 10 can compensate and account for changes in the optical properties of the thin sensing films due to time and other factors, and thus achieve long-term stability with no recalibration requirements. The two-wavelength calibration approach was determined to be reproducible for sensor films containing differing amounts of indicator to within ±0.05 pH units.

The data were then fitted with a fifth-order polynomial equation to give pH = 28.75 - 215.6r + 720.3r² - 1195r³ + 972.5r⁴ - 311.9r⁵ θ for the Congo Red sensor, where r is the absorbance ratio (^A ₆₃₅/^A ₅₆₅) • ^τtιe horizontal error bars in FIG. 9 represent the uncertainty in the measurement of the absorbance ratio. The vertical error bars in FIG. 9 represent the uncertainty in the calculated pH corresponding to the uncertainty in r, via the derivative of Equation (3) . The uncertainty in the pH calculated by Equation (3) varies from a low of ±0.03 in the middle of the calibration curve to ±0.08 and ±0.22 at the high-pH and low-pH ends, respectively. The greater uncertainty in pH at the ends of the calibration curves arises from the large change in pH corresponding to a small change in absorbance ratio. Additionally, although the bandwidth (in excess of 30 nm) of LEDs 16 and 18 causes nonlinearity of Beer-Lambert plots, this nonlinearity does not affect the accuracy of calibration plots like that shown in FIG. 9.

Particular applications of the optical sensor of the present invention include the construction of "remote sensing modules" (RSM) , which provide continuous environmental sensing at multiple remote locations, such as underground. Additionally, the optical sensor of the present invention can be used in sensors for biomedical applications, such as the measurement of physiological pH. The RSMs, which contain on-board microprocessors and FM-radio transceivers, can be placed at multiple locations along a watershed, and interrogated by a central data station located in a vehicle or communicating via microwave repeater stations. As is evident from the foregoing description, the present invention provides a solid-state optical photometer and fiber optic sensor probe that operates in a two-wavelength mode for producing long-term absorbance measurements with no recalibration requirements. The optical sensor of the present invention is capable of compensating for fluctuations in output intensities of the light sources in order to provide continuous calibration to the optical sensor with respect to the light source outputs. Additionally, the optical sensor of the present invention provides long-term stability and eliminates recalibration problems by also compensating and accounting for changes in the optical properties of the thin sensing films due to time, degradation, losses, etc., which contribute to the instability of the sensor response.

Claims

CLAIMS :

1. A dual wavelength optical sensor for measuring the optical characteristics of sensing films which are responsive to a particular quantity to be measured, the optical sensor comprising: light source means for producing light outputs at two distinct wavelengths and transmitting twin components of light to first and second outputs, the twin components of light including light at each of the two distinct wavelengths; a time-shared optical fiber receiving the two distinct wavelengths of light from the first output of the light source means and carrying the two distinct wavelengths of light on a time-shared basis to a sensor probe; the sensor probe transmitting the two distinct wavelengths of light to and from a thin sensing film associated with the sensor probe which is responsive to the quantity to be measured, the thin sensing film also being responsive to each of the two distinct wavelengths of light; detecting means receiving the two distinct wavelengths of light transmitted from the thin sensing film and measuring the optical characteristics of the thin sensing film in response to each of the two distinct wavelengths of light; reference means receiving the two distinct wavelengths of light from the second output of the light source means and monitoring the output intensity of the light source means in order to provide continuous compensation to the detecting means with respect to fluctuations in the output intensity of the light source means; and means for combining the measurements of the optical characteristics of the thin sensing film in response to each of the two distinct wavelengths in order to provide measurements which account for changes in the optical properties of the thin sensing film.

2. The optical sensor of claim 1 further comprising means for electronically modulating the two distinct wavelengths of light produced by the light source means at a predetermined frequency in order to sequentially transmit the two distinct wavelengths of light through the single optical fiber connected to the sensor probe on a time-shared basis.

3. The optical sensor of claim 2 wherein the light source means comprise first and second light emitting diodes, the first light emitting diode providing light having a wavelength of about 565 nm, and the second light emitting diode providing light having a wavelength of about 635 nm.

4. The optical sensor of claim 2 wherein the continuous compensation to the detecting means is provided by dividing the optical characteristic measurement of the thin sensing film at each distinct wavelength of light by the reference means measurement at the same distinct wavelength of light in order to produce measurements which are independent of fluctuations in the output intensity of the light source means.

5. The optical sensor of claim 2 wherein the means for combining comprises a signal processing system operable for taking a ratio of the measurements of the optical characteristics of the thin sensing film at each of the two distinct wavelengths of light in order to provide a measurement which accounts for changes in the optical properties of the thin sensing film.

6. The optical sensor of claim 2 wherein the thin sensing film is based on the immobilization of Congo Red at a porous polymer film, the thin sensing film being responsive to a pH range of 4 to 0.

7. The optical sensor of claim 6 wherein the thin sensing film changes between two optical states depending on the acidic level of the measured quantity, and the two distinct wavelengths of light are selected so that the thin sensing film is responsive to both wavelengths at each optical state of the thin sensing film.

8. A method of measuring the optical characteristics of sensing films which are responsive to a particular quantity to be measured, the method comprising: producing light source outputs at two distinct wavelengths; transmitting twin components of light from the light source outputs to first and second outputs, the twin components of light including light at each of the two distinct wavelengths; receiving one of the twin components of light from the first output and transmitting the two distinct wavelengths of light to and from a thin sensing film through a single optical fiber on a time-shared basis; sensing the quantity to be measured with the thin sensing film; measuring the optical characteristics of the thin sensing film in response to each of the two distinct wavelengths of light; monitoring the output intensity of the other twin component of light received from the second output and compensating for fluctuations in the output intensity of the light source outputs in order to provide continuous calibration with respect to the light source outputs; and combining the measurements of the optical characteristics of the thin sensing film in response to each of the two distinct wavelengths of light in order to provide measurements which account for changes in the optical properties of the thin sensing film.

9. The method of claim 8 further comprising the step of electronically modulating the two distinct wavelengths of light at a predetermined frequency in order to transmit the two distinct wavelengths of light through the single optical fiber on a time-shared basis.

10. The method of claim 9 wherein the step of combining comprises taking a ratio of the measurements of the optical charcteristics of the thin sensing film in response to each of the two distinct wavelengths of light.

AMENDED CLAIMS

[received by the International Bureau on 23 February 1993 (23.02.93); original claims 2 and 7 deleted; original claims 1,4,5,6,9 and 10 amended; new claims 3 and 8 added; original claims 3 and 8 amended and renumbered as claims 2 and 7 (4 pages)]

1. A dual wavelength optical sensor for measuring chemical properties of a particular quantity comprising: a sensor probe including a thin sensing film whose optical characteristics are responsive to the chemical properties of the quantity at at least two distinct wavelengths of light in such a way that when the responses to the at least two distinct wavelengths are combined, a self-calibrated measurement of the measured chemical properties is provided; light source means for generating the at least two distinct wavelengths of light, and a single optical fiber for carrying the light from the light source means to the sensor probe; sample detecting means receiving the light from the sensor probe after it has passed to and from the thin sensing film and producing light intensity readings for the at least two distinct wavelengths of light; and output means for combining the light intensity readings from the sample detecting means to produce the self-calibrated measurement which accounts for changes in the optical characteristics of the thin sensing film that otherwise contribute to instability in the sensor response.

2. The optical sensor as set forth in claim 1 wherein the light source means comprise first and second light emitting diodes, the first light emitting diode producing light at one of the at least two distinct wavelengths to which the thin sensing film is responsive, and the second light emitting diode producing light at another of the at least two distinct wavelengths to which the thin sensing film is responsive.

3. The optical sensor as set forth in claim 2 further comprising means for multiplexing the two distinct wavelengths of light from the respective light emitting diodes onto the single optical fiber.

4. The optical sensor as set forth in claim 1 further comprising reference detecting means coupled to the light source means in such a way as to monitor the output intensity of the light source means to provide compensation to the readings produced by the sample detecting means with respect to spectral variances in the output intensity of the light source means.

5. The optical sensor as set forth in claim 1 wherein the output means comprise a signal processing system operable for taking a ratio of the light intensity readings produced by the sample detecting means to provide the self-calibrated measurement which accounts for changes in the optical characteristics of the thin sensing film that otherwise contribute to instability in the sensor response. 6. The optical sensor as set forth in claim 1 wherein the thin sensing film is based on the immobilization of Congo Red in a porous polymer film.

7. A method of measuring chemical properties of a particular quantity based on the optical characteristics of thin sensing films which are responsive to at least two distinct wavelengths of light, the method comprising: producing light at the at least two distinct wave1engths; conveying the light through a single optical fiber to a thin sensing film; subjecting the thin sensing film to the chemical properties to be measured to produce responsive optical characteristics at the at least two distinct wavelengths which, when combined, provide a self-calibrated measurement of the chemical properties being measured; receiving the at least two distinct wavelengths of light from the thin sensing film and measuring the optical characteristics of the thin sensing film in response to the at least two distinct wavelengths of light; and combining the measurements of the optical characteristics of the thin sensing film for providing the self-calibrated measurement which accounts for changes in the optical characteristics of the thin sensing film that otherwise contribute to instability in the sensing response. 8. The method of claim 7 wherein the light at the at least two distinct wavelengths is produced by first and second light emitting diodes, the first light emitting diode providing light at one of the at least two distinct wavelengths, and the second light emitting diode providing light at another of the at least two distinct wavelengths.

9. The method of claim 7 further comprising the step of monitoring the output intensity of the light and compensating the measurements of the optical characteristics of the thin sensing film with respect to spectral variances in the output intensity of the light.

10. The method of claim 7 wherein the step of combining comprises taking a ratio of the measurements of the optical characteristics of the thin sensing film in response to the at least two distinct wavelengths of light to provide the self-calibrated measurement.