USRE37792E1 - Interpolation method for binary image - Google Patents
Interpolation method for binary image Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- USRE37792E1 USRE37792E1 US09/630,286 US63028600A USRE37792E US RE37792 E1 USRE37792 E1 US RE37792E1 US 63028600 A US63028600 A US 63028600A US RE37792 E USRE37792 E US RE37792E
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- value
- pixel
- values
- interpolation
- interpolated
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 47
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 claims description 20
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000000903 blocking effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 7
- 238000009499 grossing Methods 0.000 abstract description 7
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T3/00—Geometric image transformations in the plane of the image
- G06T3/40—Scaling of whole images or parts thereof, e.g. expanding or contracting
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T3/00—Geometric image transformations in the plane of the image
- G06T3/40—Scaling of whole images or parts thereof, e.g. expanding or contracting
- G06T3/4007—Scaling of whole images or parts thereof, e.g. expanding or contracting based on interpolation, e.g. bilinear interpolation
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N19/00—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals
- H04N19/10—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using adaptive coding
- H04N19/102—Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using adaptive coding characterised by the element, parameter or selection affected or controlled by the adaptive coding
- H04N19/13—Adaptive entropy coding, e.g. adaptive variable length coding [AVLC] or context adaptive binary arithmetic coding [CABAC]
Definitions
- the present invention relates to an interpolation method for a binary image, and more particularly, to an improved interpolation method in which a variable threshold value used for determining a pixel value to be generated by interpolation is determined according to a context (the state value of adjacent pixels).
- the shape information which refers to object information of the image, is expressed as a binary image.
- MPEG-4 adopts a content-based arithmetic encoder (CAE).
- CAE content-based arithmetic encoder
- For lossy shape coding a down sampling method and an upsampling method are performed in each shape macro block.
- a shape image is divided into shape blocks which have M ⁇ M block size.
- the down sampling refers to a method for reducing the binary image block according to a given conversion ratio.
- the reduced image block is transmitted together with the conversion ratio.
- the conversion ratio is determined such that an error between the original binary image block and an binary image block restored later is within a predetermined range.
- the reduced image block obtained by the down sampling is coded by a context based arithmetic encoder (CAE) and then transmitted.
- CAE context based arithmetic encoder
- the up sampling method is used to restore such a reduced image block.
- Up sampling is for restoring the reduced image block into the original binary image, by interpolation.
- an effective interpolation method must not cause excessive blocking and smoothing effects in the restored binary image.
- an interpolation method for a binary image for restoring a reduced binary image, reduced from an original binary image by down sampling, into the original binary image, the method comprising the steps of: (a) calculating an interpolation value based on the pixel values (object pixel values) of the reduced image around an interpolated pixel; (b) calculating a context C p (a state value of pixels (reference pixels) around the object pixels); (c) obtaining a threshold value corresponding to the calculated context; and (d) comparing the interpolation value with the threshold value of the step (c), and setting the pixel value of the interpolated pixel as “1” if the interpolation value is greater than the threshold value, and setting the pixel value of the interpolated pixel as “0” if the interpolation value is equal to or less than the threshold value.
- FIG. 1A is a diagram illustrating coding and decoding methods for a binary image according to MPEG-4;
- FIG. 1B is a diagram illustrating a down sampling step shown in FIG. 1A;
- FIG. 1C is a diagram illustrating an up sampling step shown in FIG. 1A;
- FIGS. 2A through 2D are diagrams illustrating an interpolation method according to the present invention.
- FIG. 3 is a FIGS. 3 and 3A show a flowchart illustrating a threshold value learning method according to the present invention.
- FIGS. 4A through 4C show the effect of the interpolation method according to the present invention, in contrast to the conventional method.
- coding and decoding methods for a binary image having object information according to the MPEG-4 includes a down sampling step 100 , a coding step 102 , a reverse coding step 104 and an up sampling step 106 .
- an M ⁇ N binary image block is converted into an (M ⁇ CR) ⁇ (N ⁇ CR) binary image block.
- CR is a conversion ratio indicating the ratio in size of the reduced image block obtained by the down sampling with respect to the original binary image block.
- the reduced image is encoded.
- MPEG-4 adopts a context based arithmetic encoder (CAE).
- CAE is an encoder which divides the binary image into blocks and processes all blocks by the same method.
- the CAE is adopted as a coding method in the verification model of MPEG-4, due to its simplicity and comparatively high coding efficiency.
- the reduced image coded through the coding step 102 is transmitted via a transmission route.
- the reverse coding step 104 the coded reduced image is restored into the reduced image.
- the up sampling step 106 the interpolation is performed on the reduced image to obtain the original binary image.
- FIG. 1B illustrates in detail the down sampling step 100 shown in FIG. 1 A.
- the binary image 200 is made into a plurality of macro blocks, as shown in FIG. 1 B. Pixels indicated by a character “0” in a macro block 201 are converted into one pixel indicated by a character “X”.
- the size of the macro block is determined depending on the conversion ratio.
- the conversion ratio of MPEG-4 may be 1, 1 ⁇ 2 or 1 ⁇ 4. Such conversion is performed on all macro blocks, resulting in an image reduced by the conversion ratio.
- four pixels (indicated by “0”) of a macro block are reduced to a pixel, that is, the convention ratio is equal to 1 ⁇ 2.
- pixels having value “1” represent a part of the picture containing an object
- pixels having value “0” represent a part of the picture without an object.
- the boundary between pixels having value “1” and pixels having value “0” represents the boundary of the object information.
- FIG. 1C illustrates in detail the up sampling step 106 shown in FIG. 1 A.
- each pixel of the original binary image is restored by the interpolation using four pixels of the reduced image.
- pixels A, B, C and D represent object pixels, which are pixels concerned in the interpolation
- pixels P 1 , P 2 , P 3 and P 4 represent interpolated pixels, which are pixels to be obtained by the interpolation.
- the object pixels A, B, C and D surround the interpolated pixels P 1 , P 2 , P 3 and P 4 .
- the object pixels belong to the reduced image while the interpolated pixels belong to the restored binary image.
- is obtained by a linear interpolation method as follows, using the object pixels A, B, C and D:
- P 1 r*A+s*(B+C+D)
- r*B+s*(A+C+D)
- P 3 r*C+s*(A+B+D)
- P 4 r*D+s*(A+B+C)
- r and s are weights, and r is greater than s. That is, for each interpolated pixel, the larger weight is applied to the pixel which is the closest to each interpolated pixel.
- and a threshold value THR are compared.
- the threshold value THR is set to a value which is half of the largest possible interpolation value. If the interpolation value INP
- is adaptively determined according to the context (state values of the pixels (reference pixels) around the interpolated pixel), thereby reducing ambiguity in determination of the pixel value of the interpolated pixel. Also, proposed threshold values are determined using a learning method.
- pixels A, B, C, D, C 0 , C 1 , C 2 , C 3 and C 4 indicated by “0” are pixels of the reduced image
- pixels P 1 , P 2 , P 3 and P 4 indicated by “X” represent the interpolated pixels of the restored binary image.
- the interpolation value of a pixel to be generated by the interpolation is calculated.
- the interpolation value is calculated by a bilinear interpolation method.
- the interpolation value may alternatively be calculated by using the average of the object pixels or other methods.
- the interpolation value is calculated using the bilinear interpolation method, by the following equation (1):
- A ⁇ (1 ⁇ h)(1 ⁇ v)+B ⁇ (1 ⁇ h)v+C ⁇ h(1 ⁇ v)+D ⁇ hv (1)
- is determined as a value between 0 and 1.
- the number of combinations of the object pixels is equal to 16, and the number of interpolation values INP
- the index k is varied depending on the position of the interpolated pixel. In the present invention, five pixels around the object pixels are used as the reference pixels.
- FIGS. 2A through 2D show positions and indices of the reference pixels used for interpolating the interpolated pixels P 1 through P 4 , respectively.
- are determined by a learning method, described below.
- and the threshold value THRC based on the context are compared to determine the pixel value of the interpolated pixel.
- the pixel value of the interpolated pixel becomes “1”. Otherwise, the pixel value of the interpolated pixel becomes “0”.
- the threshold value THRc is obtained by the learning method.
- the learning is performed by the step of comparing the original binary image with the restored binary image.
- are defined (step 310 ).
- holds numbers of hits, where a hit is the name given to when the restored pixel value is equal to the original pixel value.
- the hits are determined by applying all of the possible threshold values to each context.
- c is an index of the interpolation values
- t is an index of the proposed threshold values.
- the array THRc[t] stores the proposed threshold values.
- t is an index of the proposed threshold values.
- the array h[c][t] is initialized to zero (step 320 ).
- the original binary image and the reduced image are input (step 330 ).
- the location of an initial interpolated pixel is determined.
- the interpolation is performed from the upper-left to the lower-right by a raster scanning (step 340 ).
- context is calculated by the above equation (2) (step 350 ).
- the threshold index t is initialized (step 355 ).
- the interpolation value INP[P] of the interpolated pixel is calculated (step 360 ).
- the current proposed threshold value from THRc[t] is compared with the calculated interpolation value INP[P] (step 370 ). If the interpolation value INP[P] is greater than the proposed threshold value THRc[t], the pixel value P of the interpolated pixel is set to “1” (step 372 ). Otherwise, the pixel value P of the interpolated pixel is set to “0” (step 374 ).
- the pixel value P of the interpolated pixel is compared with the original pixel value (step 380 ). If the pixel value P is equal to the original pixel value, the corresponding value in the array h[c][t] is increased by “1”. This value represents the number of hits (step 385 ). Otherwise, the step 385 is not performed.
- step 390 It is checked whether the comparison of step 380 has been performed on all proposed threshold values of the current interpolation value.
- step 390 it is determined whether the interpolation has been performed on all pixels of the binary image (step 400 )
- step 390 If the condition of step 390 is not satisfied, then the process returns to step 370 .
- the proposed threshold value providing the highest frequency of hits is set as the threshold value of the corresponding interpolation value (step 400 ).
- step 390 If the condition of step 390 is not satisfied, the process returns to step 350 .
- ambiguity of the restoration performed by using only the interpolation value obtained by the bilinear interpolation can be removed by using the context, thereby reducing restoration error in the restored binary image.
- FIGS. 4A through 4C show the effect of the interpolation method according to the present invention, in contrast to the conventional method.
- FIG. 4A shows the original binary image containing the MPEG-4 logo
- FIG. 4B shows the result of the conventional interpolation described with reference to FIG. 1C
- FIG. 4C shows the result of the interpolation according to the present invention.
- the blocking and smoothing effects are sharply reduced compared to the conventional method.
- the ambiguity in the comparison between the interpolation value and the threshold value is removed by using the context (state value of the reference pixels around the interpolated pixel), thereby reducing the blocking and smoothing phenomena in the restored binary image.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Multimedia (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Image Processing (AREA)
- Editing Of Facsimile Originals (AREA)
- Compression Or Coding Systems Of Tv Signals (AREA)
- Apparatus For Radiation Diagnosis (AREA)
Abstract
An improved interpolation method in which a threshold value used for determining a pixel value of a pixel generated by interpolation according to a context (state value of adjacent pixels). In the interpolation method, the ambiguity between the interpolation value and the threshold value is removed by using the context (state value of the reference pixels around the interpolated pixel), thereby reducing the blocking and smoothing phenomena in the restored binary image.
Description
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an interpolation method for a binary image, and more particularly, to an improved interpolation method in which a variable threshold value used for determining a pixel value to be generated by interpolation is determined according to a context (the state value of adjacent pixels).
2. Description of the Related Art
Recently, a function for processing shape information has been added to MPEG-4. The shape information, which refers to object information of the image, is expressed as a binary image. To code such a binary image, MPEG-4 adopts a content-based arithmetic encoder (CAE). For lossy shape coding a down sampling method and an upsampling method are performed in each shape macro block. A shape image is divided into shape blocks which have M×M block size.
The down sampling refers to a method for reducing the binary image block according to a given conversion ratio. The reduced image block is transmitted together with the conversion ratio. Here, the conversion ratio is determined such that an error between the original binary image block and an binary image block restored later is within a predetermined range.
The reduced image block obtained by the down sampling is coded by a context based arithmetic encoder (CAE) and then transmitted.
The up sampling method is used to restore such a reduced image block. Up sampling is for restoring the reduced image block into the original binary image, by interpolation.
In such an up sampling process, an effective interpolation method must not cause excessive blocking and smoothing effects in the restored binary image.
To satisfy the above requirement, it is an object of the present invention to provide an improved interpolation method in which a context (state value of pixels adjacent to a pixel (interpolated pixel) generated by interpolation) is used for interpolation, thereby reducing blocking and smoothing effects.
To achieve the above object, there is provided an interpolation method for a binary image, for restoring a reduced binary image, reduced from an original binary image by down sampling, into the original binary image, the method comprising the steps of: (a) calculating an interpolation value based on the pixel values (object pixel values) of the reduced image around an interpolated pixel; (b) calculating a context Cp (a state value of pixels (reference pixels) around the object pixels); (c) obtaining a threshold value corresponding to the calculated context; and (d) comparing the interpolation value with the threshold value of the step (c), and setting the pixel value of the interpolated pixel as “1” if the interpolation value is greater than the threshold value, and setting the pixel value of the interpolated pixel as “0” if the interpolation value is equal to or less than the threshold value.
The above object and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent by describing in detail a preferred embodiment thereof with reference to the attached drawings in which:
FIG. 1A is a diagram illustrating coding and decoding methods for a binary image according to MPEG-4;
FIG. 1B is a diagram illustrating a down sampling step shown in FIG. 1A;
FIG. 1C is a diagram illustrating an up sampling step shown in FIG. 1A;
FIGS. 2A through 2D are diagrams illustrating an interpolation method according to the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a FIGS. 3 and 3A show a flowchart illustrating a threshold value learning method according to the present invention; and
FIGS. 4A through 4C show the effect of the interpolation method according to the present invention, in contrast to the conventional method.
In FIG. 1A, coding and decoding methods for a binary image having object information according to the MPEG-4 includes a down sampling step 100, a coding step 102, a reverse coding step 104 and an up sampling step 106.
In the down sampling step 100, an M×N binary image block is converted into an (M×CR)×(N×CR) binary image block. Here, CR is a conversion ratio indicating the ratio in size of the reduced image block obtained by the down sampling with respect to the original binary image block.
In the coding step 102, the reduced image is encoded. In order to code the binary image including objects, MPEG-4 adopts a context based arithmetic encoder (CAE). The CAE is an encoder which divides the binary image into blocks and processes all blocks by the same method. The CAE is adopted as a coding method in the verification model of MPEG-4, due to its simplicity and comparatively high coding efficiency.
The reduced image coded through the coding step 102 is transmitted via a transmission route. In the reverse coding step 104, the coded reduced image is restored into the reduced image. In the up sampling step 106, the interpolation is performed on the reduced image to obtain the original binary image.
FIG. 1B illustrates in detail the down sampling step 100 shown in FIG. 1A. The binary image 200 is made into a plurality of macro blocks, as shown in FIG. 1B. Pixels indicated by a character “0” in a macro block 201 are converted into one pixel indicated by a character “X”. Here, the size of the macro block is determined depending on the conversion ratio. The conversion ratio of MPEG-4 may be 1, ½ or ¼. Such conversion is performed on all macro blocks, resulting in an image reduced by the conversion ratio. In FIG. 1B, four pixels (indicated by “0”) of a macro block are reduced to a pixel, that is, the convention ratio is equal to ½.
In the down sampling step, if half or more pixels of each group of four pixels in a macro block are equal to “1”, the pixel value of the converted pixel becomes “1”. Here, pixels having value “1” represent a part of the picture containing an object, and pixels having value “0” represent a part of the picture without an object. The boundary between pixels having value “1” and pixels having value “0” represents the boundary of the object information.
FIG. 1C illustrates in detail the up sampling step 106 shown in FIG. 1A. During the up sampling step, each pixel of the original binary image is restored by the interpolation using four pixels of the reduced image.
Referring to FIG. 1C, a conventional interpolation method will be described in detail.
In FIG. 1C, pixels A, B, C and D represent object pixels, which are pixels concerned in the interpolation, and pixels P1, P2, P3 and P4 represent interpolated pixels, which are pixels to be obtained by the interpolation. Here, the object pixels A, B, C and D surround the interpolated pixels P1, P2, P3 and P4. Also, the object pixels belong to the reduced image while the interpolated pixels belong to the restored binary image.
First, an interpolation value INP|P| is obtained by a linear interpolation method as follows, using the object pixels A, B, C and D:
INP|P1|=r*A+s*(B+C+D)
INP|P2|=r*B+s*(A+C+D)
INP|P3|=r*C+s*(A+B+D)
INP|P4|=r*D+s*(A+B+C)
where, r and s are weights, and r is greater than s. That is, for each interpolated pixel, the larger weight is applied to the pixel which is the closest to each interpolated pixel.
Next, the obtained interpolation value INP|P| and a threshold value THR are compared. Here, the threshold value THR is set to a value which is half of the largest possible interpolation value. If the interpolation value INP|P| is greater than the threshold value THR, the pixel value of that interpolated pixel becomes “1”. Otherwise, the pixel value of the interpolated pixel becomes “0”.
Here, only one threshold THR is applied while a plurality of interpolation values INP may be applied. Thus, if the interpolation value INP|P| and the threshold value THR are close to each other, it is unclear whether the pixel value of the interpolated pixel is correct or not. Accordingly, serious blocking or smoothing phenomenon is present in the restored binary image.
To reduce the blocking or smoothing, a threshold value to be compared with the interpolation value INP|P| is adaptively determined according to the context (state values of the pixels (reference pixels) around the interpolated pixel), thereby reducing ambiguity in determination of the pixel value of the interpolated pixel. Also, proposed threshold values are determined using a learning method.
An improved interpolation method according to the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS. 2A through 2D. In FIGS. 2A through 2D, pixels A, B, C, D, C0, C1, C2, C3 and C4 indicated by “0” are pixels of the reduced image, and pixels P1, P2, P3 and P4 indicated by “X” represent the interpolated pixels of the restored binary image.
First, the interpolation value of a pixel to be generated by the interpolation is calculated. Here, the interpolation value is calculated by a bilinear interpolation method. However, the interpolation value may alternatively be calculated by using the average of the object pixels or other methods.
The interpolation value is calculated using the bilinear interpolation method, by the following equation (1):
where h and v of each term represent horizontal and vertical distances between the object pixel and the interpolated pixel included in the corresponding term. The interpolation value INP|P| is determined as a value between 0 and 1.
The number of combinations of the object pixels is equal to 16, and the number of interpolation values INP|P| is 16. However, if duplicate values are not counted, the actual number of interpolation values is 12, which are all between 0 and 1. Accordingly an integer t has the range of 0˜11, and the number of proposed threshold values THRc|t| is equal to 12, including 0, 0.0625, 0.1875, 0.25, 0.375, 0.4375, 0.5625, 0.625, 0.75, 0.8125, 0.9375 and 1.
Then, the context (state value of the reference pixels) is calculated by the following equation (2):
where P represents the position of the interpolated pixel (P indicates P1 in FIG. 2A, P2 in FIG. 2B, P3 in FIG. 2C or P4 in FIG. 2D). Ck represents the reference pixel (C0, C1, C2, C3 and C4 for K=0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively), and k is an index of reference pixels. Here, the index k is varied depending on the position of the interpolated pixel. In the present invention, five pixels around the object pixels are used as the reference pixels.
FIGS. 2A through 2D show positions and indices of the reference pixels used for interpolating the interpolated pixels P1 through P4, respectively.
The proposed threshold values THRc|t| are determined by a learning method, described below.
Then, the interpolation value INP|P| and the threshold value THRC based on the context are compared to determine the pixel value of the interpolated pixel.
If the interpolation value INP|P| is greater than the threshold value THRc, the pixel value of the interpolated pixel becomes “1”. Otherwise, the pixel value of the interpolated pixel becomes “0”.
Next, a method for determining the threshold value THRc based on the context of the reference pixel will be described. The threshold value THRc is obtained by the learning method. The learning is performed by the step of comparing the original binary image with the restored binary image.
In detail, referring to FIG. 3, first, arrays h|c||t| and THRc|t| are defined (step 310).
Here, the array h|c||t| holds numbers of hits, where a hit is the name given to when the restored pixel value is equal to the original pixel value. The hits are determined by applying all of the possible threshold values to each context.
Here, c is an index of the interpolation values, and t is an index of the proposed threshold values. In the case of FIG. 2, since the number of interpolation values and the number of proposed threshold values are both equal to 12, the size of the array becomes h [11][11].
Also, the array THRc[t] stores the proposed threshold values. Here, t is an index of the proposed threshold values.
Then, the array h[c][t] is initialized to zero (step 320).
After initializing the array h[c][t] to zero, the original binary image and the reduced image are input (step 330).
Then, the location of an initial interpolated pixel is determined. The interpolation is performed from the upper-left to the lower-right by a raster scanning (step 340).
Once the location of the interpolated pixel is determined, context is calculated by the above equation (2) (step 350).
The threshold index t is initialized (step 355).
Then, the interpolation value INP[P] of the interpolated pixel is calculated (step 360).
The current proposed threshold value from THRc[t] is compared with the calculated interpolation value INP[P] (step 370). If the interpolation value INP[P] is greater than the proposed threshold value THRc[t], the pixel value P of the interpolated pixel is set to “1” (step 372). Otherwise, the pixel value P of the interpolated pixel is set to “0” (step 374).
The pixel value P of the interpolated pixel is compared with the original pixel value (step 380). If the pixel value P is equal to the original pixel value, the corresponding value in the array h[c][t] is increased by “1”. This value represents the number of hits (step 385). Otherwise, the step 385 is not performed.
It is checked whether the comparison of step 380 has been performed on all proposed threshold values of the current interpolation value (step 390).
If the condition of step 390 is satisfied, it is determined whether the interpolation has been performed on all pixels of the binary image (step 400)
If the condition of step 390 is not satisfied, then the process returns to step 370.
If the interpolation has been performed on all pixels of the binary image, the proposed threshold value providing the highest frequency of hits is set as the threshold value of the corresponding interpolation value (step 400).
If the condition of step 390 is not satisfied, the process returns to step 350.
According to the interpolation method of the present invention, ambiguity of the restoration performed by using only the interpolation value obtained by the bilinear interpolation can be removed by using the context, thereby reducing restoration error in the restored binary image.
FIGS. 4A through 4C show the effect of the interpolation method according to the present invention, in contrast to the conventional method. In detail, FIG. 4A shows the original binary image containing the MPEG-4 logo, FIG. 4B shows the result of the conventional interpolation described with reference to FIG. 1C, and FIG. 4C shows the result of the interpolation according to the present invention. As can be seen from FIGS. 4B and 4C, the blocking and smoothing effects are sharply reduced compared to the conventional method.
As described above, in the interpolation method of the present invention, the ambiguity in the comparison between the interpolation value and the threshold value is removed by using the context (state value of the reference pixels around the interpolated pixel), thereby reducing the blocking and smoothing phenomena in the restored binary image.
Claims (10)
1. An interpolation method for restoring a reduced binary image, reduced from an original binary image by down sampling, into the original binary image, comprising the steps of:
(a) calculating a predicted value of an interpolated pixel based on values of the object pixels A, B, C and D around the interpolated pixel using the following equation:
where h and v of each term represent horizontal and vertical distances between the object pixel and the interpolated pixel included in the corresponding term;
(b) calculating a context Cp, representing a state value of reference pixels around the object pixels, by concatenation of the reference pixel values using the following equation:
wherein P represents the position of the interpolated pixel, Ck represents the reference pixel and k is an index of reference pixels;
(c) obtaining a threshold value, THRc(t), corresponding to the context Cp which is changed in each interpolated pixel based on its context; and
(d) determining the interpolated pixel as “1” if the predicted value in step (a) is greater than the threshold value in step (c), and setting the pixel value of the interpolated pixel as “0” otherwise.
2. The method as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the predicted value in step (a) is calculated by summing the values of the neighboring pixels which are weighted in a way that the nearer pixel to an interpolated pixel, the larger its weight value.
3. The method as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the threshold value THRc(t) in step (c) is obtained using the context value to decide whether each interpolated value is a “1” or “0” is determined using one of some predefined values comprising 12 default values which are calculated from the equation use in step (a).
4. The method as set forth in claim 3 , wherein said default values include: 0, 0.0625, 0.1875, 0.25, 0.375, 0.4375, 0.5625, 0.625, 0.75 and 0.9375.
5. The method as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the proposed threshold set of threshold values cited by context values in step (c) are obtained by the steps of:
(c1) defining arrays h(c)(t) and THRc(t), where c is an index of the predicted values in step (a), and t is an index of proposed threshold values;
(c2) initializing the array h(c)(t) to zero, and receiving the original binary image and the reduced image;
(c3) determining the location of the interpolated pixel to be interpolated, according to a raster scanning, and calculating a context of the reference pixels;
(c4) initializing the index t of proposed threshold values;
(c5) calculating interpolation value INP(P) of the interpolated pixel as in step (a); (c6) comparing the current proposed threshold value THRc(t) with the calculated predicted value INP(P), and setting the pixel value of the interpolated pixel to “1” if the interpolation value INP(P) is greater than the proposed threshold value THRc(t), and setting the pixel value of the interpolated pixel to “0” if the interpolation value INP(P) is less than or equal to the proposed threshold value THRc(t);
(c7) comparing the pixel value of the interpolated pixel with the original pixel value, and increasing the value of the array h(c)(t) and the index of proposed threshold values t by “1” if there is a hit, where a hit occurs when the pixel value of the interpolated pixel is equal to the original pixel value;
(c8) checking whether the comparison of the step (c6) has been performed on all proposed threshold values, and returning to the step (c6) if the comparison has not been performed on all candidate values;
(c9) checking whether the interpolation has been performed on all pixels of the binary image, and returning to the step (c3) if the interpolation has not been performed on all pixels of the binary image; and
(c10) setting the proposed threshold value having the highest frequency of hits as the threshold value of the corresponding interpolation value, if the interpolation is performed on all pixels of the binary image.
6. An interpolation method for restoring a reduced binary image, reduced from an original binary image by down sampling, into the original binary image, comprising the steps of:
(a) calculating a predicted value of an interpolated pixel based on the values of object pixels around the interpolated pixel;
(b) calculating a context C p1 representing a state value of reference pixels around the object pixels, by concatenation of the reference pixel values using the following equation:
wherein p represents the position of the interpolated pixel, Ck represents the reference pixel and k is an index of reference pixels;
(c) obtaining a threshold value, THRc(t), corresponding to the context C p which is changed in each interpolated pixel based on its context; and
(d) comparing the predicted value with the threshold value of step (c), and determining the interpolated pixel as “1” if the predicted value in step (a) is a greater than the threshold value in step (c), and setting the pixel value of the interpolated pixel as “0” if the predicted value is equal to or less than the threshold value.
7. The method as set forth in claim 6 , wherein the predicted value in step (a) is calculated by summing the values of the neighboring pixels which are weighted in a way that the nearer pixel to an interpolated pixel, the larger its weight value.
8. The method as set forth in claim 6 , wherein the threshold value THRc(t) in said step (c) is obtained using the context value to decide whether each interpolated value is a “1” or “0” is determined using one of some predefined values comprising 12 default values which are calculated from the equation use in step (a).
9. The method as set forth in claim 8 , wherein said default values include: 0, 0.0625, 0.1875, 0.25, 0.375, 0.4375, 0.5625, 0.625, 0.75 and 0.9375.
10. The method as set forth in claim 6 , wherein the proposed threshold set of threshold values cited by context values in step (c) are obtained by the steps of:
(c1 ) defining arrays h(c)(t) and THRc(t), where c is an index of the predicted values in step (a), and t is an index of proposed threshold values;
(c2 ) initializing the array h(c)(t) to zero, and receiving the original binary image and the reduced image;
(c3 ) determining the location of the interpolated pixel to be interpolated, according to a raster scanning, and calculating a context of the reference pixels;
(c4 ) initializing the index t of proposed threshold values;
(c5 ) calculating interpolation value INP(P) of the interpolated pixel as in step (a);
(c6 ) comparing the current proposed threshold value THRc(t) with the calculated predicted value INP(P), and setting the pixel value of the interpolated pixel to “1” if the interpolation value INP(P) is greater than the proposed threshold value THRc(t), and setting the pixel value of the interpolated pixel to “0” if the interpolation value INP(P) is less than or equal to the proposed threshold value THRc(t);
(c7 ) comparing the pixel value of the interpolated pixel with the original pixel value, and increasing the value of the array h(c)(t) and the index of proposed threshold values t by “1” if there is a hit, where a hit occurs when the pixel value of the interpolated pixel is equal to the original pixel value;
(c8 ) checking whether the comparison of the step (c6 ) has been performed on all proposed threshold values, and returning to the step (c6 ) if the comparison has not been performed on all candidate values;
(c9 ) checking whether the interpolation has been performed on all pixels of the binary image, and returning to the step (c3 ) if the interpolation has not been performed on all pixels of the binary image; and
(c10 ) setting the proposed threshold value having the highest frequency of hits as the threshold value of the corresponding interpolation value, if the interpolation is performed on all pixels of the binary image.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/630,286 USRE37792E1 (en) | 1997-05-29 | 2000-07-31 | Interpolation method for binary image |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
KR1019970021781A KR100314098B1 (en) | 1997-05-29 | 1997-05-29 | An interpolation method of binary shape data using an adaptive threshold by neighboring pixel values |
KR97-21781 | 1997-05-29 | ||
US08/979,852 US6021230A (en) | 1997-05-29 | 1997-11-26 | Interpolation method for binary image |
US09/630,286 USRE37792E1 (en) | 1997-05-29 | 2000-07-31 | Interpolation method for binary image |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/979,852 Reissue US6021230A (en) | 1997-05-29 | 1997-11-26 | Interpolation method for binary image |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
USRE37792E1 true USRE37792E1 (en) | 2002-07-16 |
Family
ID=19507784
Family Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/979,852 Ceased US6021230A (en) | 1997-05-29 | 1997-11-26 | Interpolation method for binary image |
US09/087,270 Ceased US6018601A (en) | 1997-05-29 | 1998-05-29 | Interpolation method for binary image |
US09/630,286 Expired - Lifetime USRE37792E1 (en) | 1997-05-29 | 2000-07-31 | Interpolation method for binary image |
Family Applications Before (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/979,852 Ceased US6021230A (en) | 1997-05-29 | 1997-11-26 | Interpolation method for binary image |
US09/087,270 Ceased US6018601A (en) | 1997-05-29 | 1998-05-29 | Interpolation method for binary image |
Country Status (11)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US6021230A (en) |
EP (1) | EP0884693B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP3669833B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR100314098B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN1155258C (en) |
BR (1) | BR9705837B1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE69720198T2 (en) |
ID (1) | ID20379A (en) |
IL (1) | IL122771A (en) |
MY (1) | MY116137A (en) |
RU (1) | RU2221274C2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP3349957B2 (en) * | 1997-07-09 | 2002-11-25 | 株式会社ハイニックスセミコンダクター | Interpolation apparatus and method for binary video information using context probability table |
US6002812A (en) * | 1997-07-10 | 1999-12-14 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Interpolation method for binary image |
JP3212917B2 (en) * | 1997-08-26 | 2001-09-25 | エヌイーシービューテクノロジー株式会社 | Scanning line interpolation device and scanning line interpolation method |
US6553153B1 (en) * | 1998-12-03 | 2003-04-22 | Chips And Technologies, Llc. | Method and apparatus for reducing video data |
KR100486700B1 (en) * | 1999-09-04 | 2005-05-03 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Linear down/up sampling apparatuses and generalized scan interleaving based encoding/decoding method and apparatus using the sampling apparatuses |
US6614917B1 (en) * | 1999-10-22 | 2003-09-02 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Dynamic process for identifying objects in multi-dimensional data |
AU2002357068A1 (en) | 2001-12-17 | 2003-06-30 | Corning Incorporated | System for selecting optical fiber reels from inventory to fill an order |
US7171493B2 (en) * | 2001-12-19 | 2007-01-30 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory | Camouflage of network traffic to resist attack |
KR100467582B1 (en) * | 2002-01-22 | 2005-01-24 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Addressing method and apparatus for halftoning |
JP3767513B2 (en) * | 2002-04-26 | 2006-04-19 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Pixel interpolation circuit, scanning line interpolation circuit, pixel interpolation method, scanning line interpolation method, and application apparatus |
CN100452909C (en) * | 2004-02-17 | 2009-01-14 | 英业达股份有限公司 | Radio local network environment testing system and its method |
CN1333372C (en) * | 2006-03-30 | 2007-08-22 | 北京中星微电子有限公司 | Resampling method for digital signal |
US20070247476A1 (en) * | 2006-04-21 | 2007-10-25 | Liron Yatziv | Fast smooth up-sampling of binary volumes derived from medical imaging |
Citations (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4360883A (en) * | 1978-03-22 | 1982-11-23 | Ricoh Co., Ltd. | Method of restoring a picture cell by estimation with high density |
US4381547A (en) * | 1979-11-28 | 1983-04-26 | Ricoh Co., Ltd. | Picture deforming process |
US4578812A (en) * | 1982-12-01 | 1986-03-25 | Nec Corporation | Digital image processing by hardware using cubic convolution interpolation |
US4771471A (en) * | 1985-03-07 | 1988-09-13 | Dainippon Screen Mfg. Co., Ltd. | Smoothing method for binary-coded image data and apparatus therefor |
US5054100A (en) * | 1989-11-16 | 1991-10-01 | Eastman Kodak Company | Pixel interpolator with edge sharpening |
US5121447A (en) * | 1989-04-27 | 1992-06-09 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Apparatus for performing gradation processing on image data |
US5345517A (en) * | 1989-04-10 | 1994-09-06 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Image reduction apparatus |
KR960030704A (en) | 1995-01-25 | 1996-08-17 | 구자홍 | Directional Interpolation Method of Image |
US5638187A (en) * | 1996-02-23 | 1997-06-10 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Image dithering method enabling conversion of a gray level pixel image into a binary pixel image |
US5644661A (en) * | 1993-10-29 | 1997-07-01 | British Technology Group Limited | Image interpolator for an image display system |
US5703965A (en) * | 1992-06-05 | 1997-12-30 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Image compression/decompression based on mathematical transform, reduction/expansion, and image sharpening |
US5754710A (en) * | 1993-08-06 | 1998-05-19 | Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. | Image resolution conversion method and appratus thereof |
US5832134A (en) * | 1996-11-27 | 1998-11-03 | General Electric Company | Data visualization enhancement through removal of dominating structures |
US5832123A (en) * | 1995-11-24 | 1998-11-03 | Kokusai Electric Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for producing an enhanced two-grayscale image |
US5911007A (en) * | 1993-10-29 | 1999-06-08 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Image processing method and apparatus |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2967014B2 (en) * | 1993-05-24 | 1999-10-25 | キヤノン株式会社 | Image processing device |
EP0645736B1 (en) * | 1993-09-27 | 2003-02-05 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Image processing apparatus |
JPH08186714A (en) * | 1994-12-27 | 1996-07-16 | Texas Instr Inc <Ti> | Noise removal of picture data and its device |
FR2743241B1 (en) * | 1995-12-28 | 1998-02-13 | Sagem | METHOD FOR MODIFYING THE RESOLUTION OF A DIGITAL IMAGE |
-
1997
- 1997-05-29 KR KR1019970021781A patent/KR100314098B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1997-11-26 US US08/979,852 patent/US6021230A/en not_active Ceased
- 1997-12-23 ID IDP973961A patent/ID20379A/en unknown
- 1997-12-23 DE DE69720198T patent/DE69720198T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1997-12-23 EP EP97310482A patent/EP0884693B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1997-12-25 IL IL12277197A patent/IL122771A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1997-12-29 CN CNB971234671A patent/CN1155258C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1997-12-29 BR BRPI9705837-8B1A patent/BR9705837B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1997-12-29 MY MYPI97006401A patent/MY116137A/en unknown
- 1997-12-30 RU RU97121882/09A patent/RU2221274C2/en active
-
1998
- 1998-02-26 JP JP04587798A patent/JP3669833B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-05-29 US US09/087,270 patent/US6018601A/en not_active Ceased
-
2000
- 2000-07-31 US US09/630,286 patent/USRE37792E1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4360883A (en) * | 1978-03-22 | 1982-11-23 | Ricoh Co., Ltd. | Method of restoring a picture cell by estimation with high density |
US4381547A (en) * | 1979-11-28 | 1983-04-26 | Ricoh Co., Ltd. | Picture deforming process |
US4578812A (en) * | 1982-12-01 | 1986-03-25 | Nec Corporation | Digital image processing by hardware using cubic convolution interpolation |
US4771471A (en) * | 1985-03-07 | 1988-09-13 | Dainippon Screen Mfg. Co., Ltd. | Smoothing method for binary-coded image data and apparatus therefor |
US5345517A (en) * | 1989-04-10 | 1994-09-06 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Image reduction apparatus |
US5121447A (en) * | 1989-04-27 | 1992-06-09 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Apparatus for performing gradation processing on image data |
US5054100A (en) * | 1989-11-16 | 1991-10-01 | Eastman Kodak Company | Pixel interpolator with edge sharpening |
US5703965A (en) * | 1992-06-05 | 1997-12-30 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Image compression/decompression based on mathematical transform, reduction/expansion, and image sharpening |
US5754710A (en) * | 1993-08-06 | 1998-05-19 | Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. | Image resolution conversion method and appratus thereof |
US5644661A (en) * | 1993-10-29 | 1997-07-01 | British Technology Group Limited | Image interpolator for an image display system |
US5911007A (en) * | 1993-10-29 | 1999-06-08 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Image processing method and apparatus |
KR960030704A (en) | 1995-01-25 | 1996-08-17 | 구자홍 | Directional Interpolation Method of Image |
US5832123A (en) * | 1995-11-24 | 1998-11-03 | Kokusai Electric Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for producing an enhanced two-grayscale image |
US5638187A (en) * | 1996-02-23 | 1997-06-10 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Image dithering method enabling conversion of a gray level pixel image into a binary pixel image |
US5832134A (en) * | 1996-11-27 | 1998-11-03 | General Electric Company | Data visualization enhancement through removal of dominating structures |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN1155258C (en) | 2004-06-23 |
KR19980085643A (en) | 1998-12-05 |
EP0884693A3 (en) | 1999-10-20 |
EP0884693A2 (en) | 1998-12-16 |
EP0884693B1 (en) | 2003-03-26 |
MY116137A (en) | 2003-11-28 |
KR100314098B1 (en) | 2001-12-12 |
US6021230A (en) | 2000-02-01 |
BR9705837B1 (en) | 2013-06-11 |
JP3669833B2 (en) | 2005-07-13 |
US6018601A (en) | 2000-01-25 |
IL122771A (en) | 2003-06-24 |
ID20379A (en) | 1998-12-03 |
IL122771A0 (en) | 1998-08-16 |
JPH10336431A (en) | 1998-12-18 |
CN1201333A (en) | 1998-12-09 |
BR9705837A (en) | 1999-03-16 |
DE69720198D1 (en) | 2003-04-30 |
RU2221274C2 (en) | 2004-01-10 |
DE69720198T2 (en) | 2004-01-29 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
USRE37792E1 (en) | Interpolation method for binary image | |
JPH07154784A (en) | Channel error correction method for video signal by quantization of classified vector | |
EP0613290B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for binary image data compression | |
WO2010074170A1 (en) | Image decoding device and image coding device | |
US20070047651A1 (en) | Video prediction apparatus and method for multi-format codec and video encoding/decoding apparatus and method using the video prediction apparatus and method | |
EP0890921B1 (en) | Interpolation method for binary image | |
JP3819482B2 (en) | Adaptive contour coding method | |
Chang et al. | An image zooming technique based on vector quantization approximation | |
US6263115B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for encoding a binary shape signal | |
EP0853435A2 (en) | Method and apparatus for encoding a contour image of an object in a video signal | |
US6198508B1 (en) | Method of encoding picture data and apparatus therefor | |
USRE37755E1 (en) | Interpolation method for binary image | |
US6240212B1 (en) | Scan interleaving method | |
US6002813A (en) | Interpolation method for binary image | |
US6944347B2 (en) | Image compression and restoring method for binary images | |
US7389005B2 (en) | Interpolation of video and audio digital data | |
JPH0265372A (en) | Encoding system for picture | |
EP1443461B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for texture compression | |
KR100252010B1 (en) | An interpolation method of binary shape using an adaptive thereshold | |
KR100269205B1 (en) | An interpolation method of binary shape using an adaptive threshold | |
JPH11272843A (en) | Device and method for encoding color image, and device and method for decoding color image | |
JPH099065A (en) | Picture data compression encoding method and decoding method | |
JP2001028052A (en) | Image interpolating device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Free format text: PAYER NUMBER DE-ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: RMPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 12 |