US7937069B2 - System and process for switching between cell phone and landline services - Google Patents
System and process for switching between cell phone and landline services Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US7937069B2 US7937069B2 US11/380,898 US38089806A US7937069B2 US 7937069 B2 US7937069 B2 US 7937069B2 US 38089806 A US38089806 A US 38089806A US 7937069 B2 US7937069 B2 US 7937069B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- call
- service
- base station
- phone
- determining
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related, expires
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
- H04M15/00—Arrangements for metering, time-control or time indication ; Metering, charging or billing arrangements for voice wireline or wireless communications, e.g. VoIP
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
- H04M15/00—Arrangements for metering, time-control or time indication ; Metering, charging or billing arrangements for voice wireline or wireless communications, e.g. VoIP
- H04M15/80—Rating or billing plans; Tariff determination aspects
- H04M15/8044—Least cost routing
- H04M15/8055—Selecting cheaper transport technology for a given service
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
- H04M2215/00—Metering arrangements; Time controlling arrangements; Time indicating arrangements
- H04M2215/74—Rating aspects, e.g. rating parameters or tariff determination apects
- H04M2215/745—Least cost routing, e.g. Automatic or manual, call by call or by preselection
- H04M2215/7464—Select transport technology for a given service, e.g. use for data connection WLAN rather than GSM/UMTS/GPRS or use company's communication network rather than a public network
Definitions
- the invention relates to a system and a process for determining the most advantageous telephone system to use to connect a call based upon the price of the call and the quality of the reception.
- the system can then be used to automatically switch the user between the different services or to allow a user to manually select the different services to use.
- a docking station could decide whether it should route the current call through a cell phone or through a land line service such as a POTS service or a voice over IP or VOIP service.
- a land line service such as a POTS service or a voice over IP or VOIP service.
- charges associated with a cell phone service can vary depending on different characteristics associated with the call.
- the call is a local call, such as within the same area code
- many land line plans allow free local calls within the United States.
- using a cell phone instead of a landline would mean that the user would lose precious minutes on his or her cell phone plan that could have easily been saved if the user had not chosen to use the cell phone plan.
- the penalties could be particularly harsh. For example, a user may have 600 free minutes in a month for $39.99, however if the user exceeds this time limit, then the user could be charged up to 40 cents a minute.
- the present invention is not limited to a simple docking station for a cell phone but rather an intelligent system that can include a docking station that can be used to optimize the cost relating to a user's phone bills.
- the invention can relate to a system for determining which type of telephone communication service to use.
- the system can include at least one base station, and at least one telephone communication system or mechanism in communication with the base station.
- There can also be at least one computer which is in communication with at least one the base station or the telephone communication system or mechanism.
- the database system can be for storing data, which can be used for assisting the computer in selecting a particular telecommunication service to place a telephone call based upon a user's preferences.
- the computer can be in the form of a server which is in communication with the base station over the communication network.
- the database can be disposed on the server.
- the computer for performing the functions for this system can be stored in a telephone handset or in a base station for receiving a telephone handset or functioning as a telephone.
- the database can include a plurality of listings of characteristics including the price of a call and the quality of a reception of a call based upon historical data.
- the computer can determine a level of quality of call reception during an initialization of a call.
- the database can be used to store information about a caller's plan including the number of minutes left in the user's plan.
- the database can be used to store information about a caller's plan including the different rates based upon the time of day of the call.
- this database can be used to store information relating to a number prefix for a discount calling plan for a user's call.
- this database can be used to store information relating to a number prefix for the region that the user is calling.
- This database can also be used to store information relating to whether a call is local, toll free, or an international call. All of these characteristics can be compiled in a database matrix table which would allow the computer or the user to quickly select the desired type of calling plan.
- the computer can be used to determine the cost of a call based upon at least one of the following characteristics: the number of minutes left in a user's plan; the time of day or the day of the week; the party being called; the number prefix for determining whether the user is calling under a discount calling plan; the number prefix for determining whether the call is a local, toll free, or international; the information relating to the carrier of the number to be dialed, and a listing of the historical records for the connection quality for a telephone call based upon the region that the user is calling from.
- the computer or computers can process this information in the database and make the determination based upon a series of steps that can be in any practical order.
- the first step can include determining which phone services are available, for example, the computer may be able to select from a plurality of different plans for each user including at least one cell phone plan, at least one land line plan or at least one voice over IP plan (VOIP).
- VOIP voice over IP plan
- the computer can determine for at least one phone service, the number of minutes left in that plan.
- the computer can determine the time and day of the week or the day of the month for a particular call. For example, some cell phone plans have free unlimited calling during nights and weekends. This type of pricing plan would be included as part of the pricing schedule. In addition if a user was calling during the end of the time period such as the end of the month and there were still a substantial number of minutes left in that user's plan, then the computer could select the appropriate plan for that user which would most likely be the user's cell phone plan.
- the computer could determine whether the number to be dialed is part of a similar network or service provider as the service where the call is originating from.
- the computer could be used to determine whether the call is either local, toll free, or international.
- the calls associated with a land line or POTS connection are free if the call is designated as a local or toll free call such as relating to a (800) prefix number.
- international calls are less expensive when originating from a land line call rather than via a cellular calling plan. All of these factors would be weighed to determine the pricing of the call.
- the computer could determine the signal strength for the call. This would be particularly important for wireless telephone plans which can include cellular telephones and satellite telephones. If the reception quality is not sufficiently strong, then it may be more beneficial for a user to individually select or to have a computer select a calling plan that may cost the user more but offer better service.
- the computer can select based upon an algorithm which can use a formula or a database matrix table for selecting the best combination of price and quality of reception based upon a default set of criteria, or based upon a user's pre-set selection criteria.
- the computer could connect a telephone call to a desired telephone destination.
- FIG. 1A is a block diagram showing multiple potential embodiments of a layout of the system
- FIG. 1B is a block diagram of a layout of the computer
- FIG. 2 shows another embodiment of a system for housing a computer
- FIG. 3A shows a block diagram for a first embodiment of a base station
- FIG. 3B shows a perspective view of the base station shown in FIG. 3A ;
- FIG. 3C shows a block diagram for a second embodiment of a base station
- FIG. 3D shows a perspective view of the base station shown in FIG. 3C ;
- FIG. 3E shows another embodiment of a base station
- FIG. 4 shows a block diagram for a handset
- FIG. 5 is a view of the matrix for determining the system for selecting the carrier plan
- FIG. 6 is a flow chart for a first process for the system.
- FIG. 7 is a another flow chart for conducting an alternative process for the system.
- FIG. 1A is a block diagram of a first embodiment of the system.
- a base station 12 which can include a computer 20 which is shown in greater detail in FIG. 1B .
- computer can be in the form of any type of computer such as a personal computer (PC) or a server or it can be in the form of a set of processing and memory components including a RAM memory 24 , a ROM or flash memory or mass storage 26 and a processor 22 .
- Base station 12 can be in communication with server 40 , and telecommunications system 50 .
- Remote computers 42 and 44 can be in communication with server 40 and/or with base station 12 . This communication can be through a direct connection to base station or through an internet or ethernet connection with base station through another computer.
- Database 100 can be stored on base station 12 , computer 20 , server 40 , or telecommunications system 50 or remote computers 42 or 44 .
- FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of an alternative system which includes a telephone communication system 50 which can housed in a computer 20 .
- Telephone communication system can be in the form of a cordless telephone which can house a computer type device 20 inside.
- the program or process followed by the system can be processed inside of computer 20 which is disposed inside of the associated handset.
- database 100 can be either store on handset or communicator system 50 , or in base station 12 , or on server 40 wherein if this database is stored in server 40 it can also be uploaded to telephone communicator system or handset 50 or to base station 12 .
- Remote computers 40 and 42 can also be used to input information into the system, particularly into database 100 to update information relating to database 100 including information regarding particular calling plans, pricing, historical reception quality or any other characteristic processed by database 100 .
- FIG. 3A shows a schematic block diagram of a base station 12 wherein this base station is shown in a perspective view in FIG. 3B .
- this base station 12 can include a communications interface 80 , which can be in the form of a keypad, a speakerphone, or loudspeaker, an LED or LCD display and any other interactive features necessary for achieving a call.
- this device can also include an antenna 60 , for wireless communication, an RJ11 connection 62 or a TCPIP or ethernet communications connection 64 .
- antenna 60 can be for any known wireless communication including but not limited to 900 mHz communications, 80211 a, b or g communications bluetooth communications, satellite communications, or any other known wireless type of communications.
- RJ11 connection 62 can be used to allow this base station 12 to connect to a typical telephone line
- ethernet connection 64 can be used to allow this base station to connect to a computer or other computerized network.
- RJ11 connection 62 can be used to allow this base station 12 to connect to a typical telephone line
- ethernet connection 64 can be used to allow this base station to connect to a computer or other computerized network.
- These different types of connections are all optional so long as there is at least one type of communication with the base station.
- the base station may only include a wireless antenna 60 which could allow the system to compare the pricing on at least two wireless plans, or to compare the pricing between a wireless plan and a wired plan that communicates through antenna 60 such as a typical phone plan or a VOIP type plan.
- a power source 121 which can be in the form of a battery or a power input to power this system. All of these components can communicate with each other through either one common mother board or multiple motherboards in any known manner.
- this base station 12 Connected to this base station 12 is also a handset 90 which allows a user to communicate using this handset which can be in wired communication with this base station 12 .
- FIG. 3C shows a block diagram for a similar type base station 12 a , however this type base station does not include an antenna or a SIM card as disclosed in FIG. 3A , because this antenna and SIM card is disposed inside of handset or telecommunications system 50 as shown in FIG. 4A .
- this base station there can be a handset 90 coupled to the base station, while there is also an additional handset communication interface 100 , which can be used to allow a handset/telecommunications system 50 to communicate with handset 12 a .
- Handset communication interface 100 includes communication connections for establishing a communication contact with handset 50 , and also for establishing a power connection with handset 50 to recharge a battery or power module 120 (See FIG. 4A ).
- an optional communications interface 80 which would allow a user to dial a number or to communicate via a speakerphone without touching handset 50 .
- FIG. 3E shows a perspective view of a similar type handset which can include a handset communication interface 100 , and may optionally include a computer 20 for running the process according to the system.
- this type of design can also be built as a simple basic handset for recharging a handset or for further communication via RJ11 communication interface 62 or ethernet communication interface 64 while the process runs on a computer or computer type system on handset 50 .
- FIG. 4A is a block diagram of a set of components for a handset 50 .
- Handset 50 can also include at least one SIM card 72 , however this handset can also include multiple additional SIM cards as well.
- this handset 50 can also include a communications interface 82 which can include a keypad, a speakerphone, a microphone, a display, or any other means for communicating via a handset that is known in the art.
- a base station communication interface 102 can be used to communicate with handset communications interface 100 . This form of communication can be in the form of a power connection, and a data connection so that power can be received by handset 50 from the base station, while data can be both uploaded and downloaded between handset 50 and its associated base station.
- handset 50 can also include at least one optional RJ11 connection(s) 62 —and/or at least one optional Ethernet connection(s) 64 . Communications between many of these components housed inside of handset 50 can be through a motherboard of any known design which can be used to connect these components together inside of a common handset housing.
- FIG. 5 shows a matrix which can be used to help a user or the system to determine which telecommunications system or plan to use before transmitting a call.
- this matrix 200 can be stored with database 100 and can be set forth as a composite or array of price vs. quality of reception.
- either a computer 20 , a handset 50 or a base station can determine the signal strength of a reception connection either through actual or historical calling data.
- the actual data could be the particular reading that is registered as a reception signal either through the handset or through the base station. In most cases, this reading is shown visually on a display through “bars” wherein with most cell phones, 0 bars means little or no reception and the greatest number of bars such as 5 bars means the highest reception quality.
- the reception quality of the call can be based entirely on the historical data, of the reception signal rather than on the actual signal received by either the handset or the base station.
- this information can be read from the antenna 60 or 62 and then stored in database during a previous call. For example, if calls are consistently made from a particular stationary base station, and the call reception is consistent because this base station does not move, then the system can use this historical information recorded in database 100 to calculate the proper calling system using matrix 200 .
- the cost of a particular call can be determined. This cost can be determined by querying the different parameters for different calling plans and then determining which plan would be most likely to invoke the least cost on the present call and on calls in the recent future.
- some of the parameters for determining the cost of a call can include at least one of the following parameters: determining the minutes left in a users calling plan; determine the time, day of the week and day of the month; determine whether the receiving caller is part of the same network, determine whether a call is local, toll free, or international, determine whether the call is an emergency call such as a 911 call, or any other parameter which may affect a users access or the cost of a users call.
- the weighted cost of a call may be different depending on the time of the month, and the number of minutes left.
- the weighted cost of a call on a plan having 600 minutes left in a month and only one hour left in the month might be much lower than a weighted cost of a call having only 30 minutes left and 28 days left in the monthly or periodic calling plan cycle.
- Matrix 200 shows that in many cases calls using a plan which result in the position of 201 in matrix 200 would most likely be the most advantageous type of call. This is because this type of call would be a call with the highest reception quality and the lowest cost. Conversely calls through a system which would be found in box 216 in matrix 200 would result in the least advantageous call because this would result in the lowest reception quality with the highest cost.
- the system or program running on computer 20 can provide default settings for weighted criteria for reception quality and for the cost of the call.
- each prospective call can be charted on a matrix such as that shown in matrix 200 .
- a user could adjust these default settings to alter the positioning of different options on this matrix.
- each user could adjust the weighted settings for cost or reception quality.
- a user may value reception quality higher than the associated cost.
- the user may be able to adjust these values or correlate these values by placing an approximate price tag on reception quality. Therefore, each “bar” in reception quality may be balanced against a prospective call cost such as for each bar of increased reception quality, would amount to an associated $1.00 in call cost.
- the system could also calculate the duration of the call, based upon previous calling data to the same number. For example, if a user was calling his or her parents, at a particular number, and the duration of that call was on average 1 minute, then the total cost of an estimated call could be calculated vs. reception quality. Alternatively, if a user was calling a new partner, or significant other and the average call length was much longer, then the system could calculate a different level of cost vs. reception quality by placing a higher weight on the expected cost of the call vs. reception quality.
- FIG. 6 shows an example of a flow chart for the process which can be conducted by a program performed on computer 20 .
- This program can be performed on a computer 20 which can be housed on any known personal computer or server 40 , 42 , or 44 , in a base station 12 , 12 a , or 12 b or in handset 50 .
- step 1 can include the step of determining the array of services provided for an individual user.
- a user can subscribe to multiple calling plans including multiple cell phone plans, multiple satellite phone plans, multiple line or POTS based plans, and multiple VOIP plans. All plans available to a particular user at that particular calling time are then polled and identified in this step.
- This step can be optional but can be important because if a handset is not in communication with a base station, it may not have access to different calling plans such as a VOIP plan that is in communication with a base station. Therefore, the system may then only have access to wireless type plans.
- step 2 the process can optionally include determining the minutes left in a plan. This step can be optional but possibly important because many cellular telephone plans can include different pricing plans depending on the minutes left in a user's plan.
- step 3 the system can optionally include a step of determining the time and day of the week. Some calling plans offer rate plans that include “free nights and weekends” or other types of plans. In that case, these parameters could be important for pricing a telephone call.
- the system could optionally determine the signal strength of the handset or in the base station. As described above, this determination could be based upon the actual data received on the reception strength by an antenna. Alternatively this reception quality could be based upon historical data of previous phone calls. This historical data could be stored in database 100 .
- step 5 the process and system could optionally determine whether the receiving caller is part of a same calling network. Some calling plans offer free calls or discounted calls if the call is with the same network.
- step 6 the system, process or program could determine whether the call is local, toll free, or international. For example, local calls, and toll free calls may be free on a land line system. In addition, long distance calls could be less expensive depending on the carrier or calling system used.
- Step 7 results in either the system selecting the most desirable call service or the user having the selection of his or her most desired service.
- the user could be shown a matrix such as matrix 200 which would be presented on a screen either on base station 12 , handset 50 , or on a screen associated with server 40 or remote computes 42 or 44 , could show the position of each calling service positioned in different positions in matrix 200 . The user could then select a particular plan based upon a position on this matrix.
- this selection could be made by assigning a number to each calling plan and then allowing a user to press an associated number on the keypad associated with either base station 12 , or 12 a or on a keypad on handset 50 to choose the desired calling plan or on a keyboard, in connection with computers 40 , 42 , or 44 , base station 12 , 12 a , or 12 b , or with hand set 50 .
- This selection could also be performed on a computer using a computer keyboard which could be used to select a particular plan.
- the system could place the call through the most desired service.
- FIG. 7 discloses an alternative process which can include steps 201 - 210 , wherein steps 201 - 207 could be performed in any order.
- step 201 could include determining the different services in the array of services.
- Step 202 can include determining the signal strength for each of these services.
- step 203 can include determining the number of minutes left in each plan or in any one of the particular plans.
- step 204 involves determining the time of day and the day of the week.
- step 205 can include determining whether the receiving caller is part of the same network.
- step 206 can include determining whether the call is local, toll free, or international.
- step 207 the system can include determining the historical call duration to a particular caller based upon previous call data.
- step 208 the system can be used to determine the position of each calling plan on matrix 200 .
- step 209 either the user or the system could select the most desirable service while in step 210 , the system can connect the call through the most desired service.
- this system could be set so that the least cost/and highest quality service is either automatically selected each time or manually selected by each user or a combination of both.
- this type of system also allows each user to adjust his or her weighted preferences for cost and quality of reception based upon individual tastes. For example, a user could log into a handset 50 a abase station 12 or a remote computer 42 or 44 or server 40 and access database 100 . Once the user has access to this database, the user can use a keypad associated with handset 50 or base station 12 or a keyboard associated with either server 40 , remote computer 42 or remote computer 44 and reset particular weighted values for signal strength or price.
- each user could have multiple customizable presets for different calling numbers. For example, if a user was calling an emergency number such as 911, the preset could always be set for the highest quality call over price.
- this system could be used to give each user the most variety in calling plans for any particular call.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
- Telephonic Communication Services (AREA)
Abstract
A system and a method for determining which type of telephone communication service to use. The system can include at least one base station, and at least one telephone communication system in communication with the base station. There can also be at least one computer which is in communication with at least one of the base station or the telephone communication system. There can also be at least one database system in communication with the computer. The database system can be for storing data for assisting the computer in selecting a particular telecommunication service to place a telephone call based upon a user's preferences. The database system can include a matrix which sets the price of the telephone call vs. the signal or reception quality of the call so that the computer or system will select the most desired calling plan based upon a user's criteria or preferences.
Description
This application is a non provisional application and hereby claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/676,632 filed on Apr. 29, 2005, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
The invention relates to a system and a process for determining the most advantageous telephone system to use to connect a call based upon the price of the call and the quality of the reception. The system can then be used to automatically switch the user between the different services or to allow a user to manually select the different services to use.
Other telephone systems are known in the art. For example: U.S. Pat. No. 5,638,433 to Bubian, Jr. et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 6,970,692 to Tysor; U.S. Pat. No. 6,813,264 to Vassilovski; U.S. Pat. No. 6,804,532 to Moon et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 6,836,644 to Bacon et al.; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2005/0153736 to Ganton; US Patent Application Publication No. 2005/0107086 to Tell et al.; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2004/0242230 to Rue; U.S. Pat. No. 6,804,536 to Bultman; U.S. Pat. No. 2004/0235518 to Beyette et al.; US Patent Application Publication No. 2004/0204033 to Yang; U.S. Pat. No. 6,539,237 to Sayers et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 6,498,938 to Morrow, Sr.; U.S. Pat. No. 6,741,835 to Pulver; US Patent Application Publication No. 2004/0259541 to Hicks et al. III; U.S. Pat. No. 6,240,169 to Haskins et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 6,078,652 to Barak; U.S. Pat. No. 7,003,281 to Gamble; U.S. Pat. No. 6,487,283 to Thomas et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,138,650 to Stahl et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 6,424,760 Katz et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 6,751,462 to Torrey et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 6,473,499 to Ng; US Patent Application Publication No. 2004/0266478 to King et al.; and U.S. Publication No. 2006/0068795 to Caspi et al., the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
In this case it could be advantageous to a user if a docking station could decide whether it should route the current call through a cell phone or through a land line service such as a POTS service or a voice over IP or VOIP service. Under many circumstances it may be more advantageous to route calls through either a cell phone, or a VOIP service, however, charges associated with a cell phone service can vary depending on different characteristics associated with the call.
For example, if the call is a local call, such as within the same area code, many land line plans allow free local calls within the United States. Thus, in this instance, using a cell phone instead of a landline would mean that the user would lose precious minutes on his or her cell phone plan that could have easily been saved if the user had not chosen to use the cell phone plan.
In addition, international calls or calls using specific numbers such as 1-800 numbers are typically less expensive when using a land line. This is because third party providers often offer plans to save on international, long distance and even frequently called numbers.
Furthermore, depending on the cell phone plan, if a user exceeds his or her minutes, the penalties could be particularly harsh. For example, a user may have 600 free minutes in a month for $39.99, however if the user exceeds this time limit, then the user could be charged up to 40 cents a minute.
Therefore, the present invention is not limited to a simple docking station for a cell phone but rather an intelligent system that can include a docking station that can be used to optimize the cost relating to a user's phone bills.
The invention can relate to a system for determining which type of telephone communication service to use. The system can include at least one base station, and at least one telephone communication system or mechanism in communication with the base station. There can also be at least one computer which is in communication with at least one the base station or the telephone communication system or mechanism. There can also be at least one database system in communication with the computer. The database system can be for storing data, which can be used for assisting the computer in selecting a particular telecommunication service to place a telephone call based upon a user's preferences.
In addition, there can also be a communication network, wherein the computer can be in the form of a server which is in communication with the base station over the communication network. In this case, the database can be disposed on the server.
Alternatively the computer for performing the functions for this system can be stored in a telephone handset or in a base station for receiving a telephone handset or functioning as a telephone.
The database can include a plurality of listings of characteristics including the price of a call and the quality of a reception of a call based upon historical data.
To determine the characteristics surrounding a telephone call, the computer can determine a level of quality of call reception during an initialization of a call. In addition, the database can be used to store information about a caller's plan including the number of minutes left in the user's plan.
In this case, the database can be used to store information about a caller's plan including the different rates based upon the time of day of the call. In addition, this database can be used to store information relating to a number prefix for a discount calling plan for a user's call. Furthermore, this database can be used to store information relating to a number prefix for the region that the user is calling. This database can also be used to store information relating to whether a call is local, toll free, or an international call. All of these characteristics can be compiled in a database matrix table which would allow the computer or the user to quickly select the desired type of calling plan.
Once these characteristics have been compiled, the computer can be used to determine the cost of a call based upon at least one of the following characteristics: the number of minutes left in a user's plan; the time of day or the day of the week; the party being called; the number prefix for determining whether the user is calling under a discount calling plan; the number prefix for determining whether the call is a local, toll free, or international; the information relating to the carrier of the number to be dialed, and a listing of the historical records for the connection quality for a telephone call based upon the region that the user is calling from.
Essentially, the computer or computers can process this information in the database and make the determination based upon a series of steps that can be in any practical order. For example, the first step can include determining which phone services are available, for example, the computer may be able to select from a plurality of different plans for each user including at least one cell phone plan, at least one land line plan or at least one voice over IP plan (VOIP).
Next, if the pricing of the plan is based upon the number of minutes in the plan, the computer can determine for at least one phone service, the number of minutes left in that plan.
Next, the computer can determine the time and day of the week or the day of the month for a particular call. For example, some cell phone plans have free unlimited calling during nights and weekends. This type of pricing plan would be included as part of the pricing schedule. In addition if a user was calling during the end of the time period such as the end of the month and there were still a substantial number of minutes left in that user's plan, then the computer could select the appropriate plan for that user which would most likely be the user's cell phone plan.
Next, the computer could determine whether the number to be dialed is part of a similar network or service provider as the service where the call is originating from. In addition the computer could be used to determine whether the call is either local, toll free, or international. In many cases, the calls associated with a land line or POTS connection are free if the call is designated as a local or toll free call such as relating to a (800) prefix number. In addition, it is currently recognized that international calls are less expensive when originating from a land line call rather than via a cellular calling plan. All of these factors would be weighed to determine the pricing of the call.
Next, the computer could determine the signal strength for the call. This would be particularly important for wireless telephone plans which can include cellular telephones and satellite telephones. If the reception quality is not sufficiently strong, then it may be more beneficial for a user to individually select or to have a computer select a calling plan that may cost the user more but offer better service.
Based upon these criteria, the computer can select based upon an algorithm which can use a formula or a database matrix table for selecting the best combination of price and quality of reception based upon a default set of criteria, or based upon a user's pre-set selection criteria. Next, the computer could connect a telephone call to a desired telephone destination.
Other objects and features of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description considered in connection with the accompanying drawings which disclose at least one embodiment of the present invention. It should be understood, however, that the drawings are designed for the purpose of illustration only and not as a definition of the limits of the invention.
In the drawings, wherein similar reference characters denote similar elements throughout the several views:
Referring in detail to the drawings, FIG. 1A is a block diagram of a first embodiment of the system. With this design, there is a base station 12 which can include a computer 20 which is shown in greater detail in FIG. 1B . For example, computer can be in the form of any type of computer such as a personal computer (PC) or a server or it can be in the form of a set of processing and memory components including a RAM memory 24, a ROM or flash memory or mass storage 26 and a processor 22.
For example, antenna 60 can be for any known wireless communication including but not limited to 900 mHz communications, 80211 a, b or g communications bluetooth communications, satellite communications, or any other known wireless type of communications.
Connected to this base station 12 is also a handset 90 which allows a user to communicate using this handset which can be in wired communication with this base station 12.
With this device, there can be an optional communications interface 80 which would allow a user to dial a number or to communicate via a speakerphone without touching handset 50.
In at least one other embodiment of handset 50 can also include at least one optional RJ11 connection(s) 62—and/or at least one optional Ethernet connection(s) 64. Communications between many of these components housed inside of handset 50 can be through a motherboard of any known design which can be used to connect these components together inside of a common handset housing.
Alternatively, the reception quality of the call can be based entirely on the historical data, of the reception signal rather than on the actual signal received by either the handset or the base station. For example, this information can be read from the antenna 60 or 62 and then stored in database during a previous call. For example, if calls are consistently made from a particular stationary base station, and the call reception is consistent because this base station does not move, then the system can use this historical information recorded in database 100 to calculate the proper calling system using matrix 200.
In addition to the signal quality, the cost of a particular call can be determined. This cost can be determined by querying the different parameters for different calling plans and then determining which plan would be most likely to invoke the least cost on the present call and on calls in the recent future.
For example, some of the parameters for determining the cost of a call can include at least one of the following parameters: determining the minutes left in a users calling plan; determine the time, day of the week and day of the month; determine whether the receiving caller is part of the same network, determine whether a call is local, toll free, or international, determine whether the call is an emergency call such as a 911 call, or any other parameter which may affect a users access or the cost of a users call. Thus, depending on the time of the month, and the number of minutes left, the weighted cost of a call may be different. For example, the weighted cost of a call on a plan having 600 minutes left in a month and only one hour left in the month might be much lower than a weighted cost of a call having only 30 minutes left and 28 days left in the monthly or periodic calling plan cycle.
This simultaneous or effectively simultaneous cost vs. reception comparison can be used to provide for a particular user the best quality call at the lowest price. Matrix 200 shows that in many cases calls using a plan which result in the position of 201 in matrix 200 would most likely be the most advantageous type of call. This is because this type of call would be a call with the highest reception quality and the lowest cost. Conversely calls through a system which would be found in box 216 in matrix 200 would result in the least advantageous call because this would result in the lowest reception quality with the highest cost.
The system or program running on computer 20 can provide default settings for weighted criteria for reception quality and for the cost of the call. In this way, each prospective call can be charted on a matrix such as that shown in matrix 200. In addition, a user could adjust these default settings to alter the positioning of different options on this matrix. For example, each user could adjust the weighted settings for cost or reception quality. Thus, a user may value reception quality higher than the associated cost. Alternatively, the user may be able to adjust these values or correlate these values by placing an approximate price tag on reception quality. Therefore, each “bar” in reception quality may be balanced against a prospective call cost such as for each bar of increased reception quality, would amount to an associated $1.00 in call cost.
Before placing the call, the system could also calculate the duration of the call, based upon previous calling data to the same number. For example, if a user was calling his or her parents, at a particular number, and the duration of that call was on average 1 minute, then the total cost of an estimated call could be calculated vs. reception quality. Alternatively, if a user was calling a new partner, or significant other and the average call length was much longer, then the system could calculate a different level of cost vs. reception quality by placing a higher weight on the expected cost of the call vs. reception quality.
This process can be in any known practical order wherein the order shown in FIG. 6 is shown by way of example. For example, step 1 can include the step of determining the array of services provided for an individual user. For example, a user can subscribe to multiple calling plans including multiple cell phone plans, multiple satellite phone plans, multiple line or POTS based plans, and multiple VOIP plans. All plans available to a particular user at that particular calling time are then polled and identified in this step. This step can be optional but can be important because if a handset is not in communication with a base station, it may not have access to different calling plans such as a VOIP plan that is in communication with a base station. Therefore, the system may then only have access to wireless type plans.
Next, in step 2, the process can optionally include determining the minutes left in a plan. This step can be optional but possibly important because many cellular telephone plans can include different pricing plans depending on the minutes left in a user's plan. Next, in step 3, the system can optionally include a step of determining the time and day of the week. Some calling plans offer rate plans that include “free nights and weekends” or other types of plans. In that case, these parameters could be important for pricing a telephone call.
Next, in step 4, the system could optionally determine the signal strength of the handset or in the base station. As described above, this determination could be based upon the actual data received on the reception strength by an antenna. Alternatively this reception quality could be based upon historical data of previous phone calls. This historical data could be stored in database 100.
Next, in step 5, the process and system could optionally determine whether the receiving caller is part of a same calling network. Some calling plans offer free calls or discounted calls if the call is with the same network. Next, in step 6, the system, process or program could determine whether the call is local, toll free, or international. For example, local calls, and toll free calls may be free on a land line system. In addition, long distance calls could be less expensive depending on the carrier or calling system used.
Ultimately this system could be set so that the least cost/and highest quality service is either automatically selected each time or manually selected by each user or a combination of both. In addition, this type of system also allows each user to adjust his or her weighted preferences for cost and quality of reception based upon individual tastes. For example, a user could log into a handset 50 a abase station 12 or a remote computer 42 or 44 or server 40 and access database 100. Once the user has access to this database, the user can use a keypad associated with handset 50 or base station 12 or a keyboard associated with either server 40, remote computer 42 or remote computer 44 and reset particular weighted values for signal strength or price. In addition, each user could have multiple customizable presets for different calling numbers. For example, if a user was calling an emergency number such as 911, the preset could always be set for the highest quality call over price.
Ultimately, this system could be used to give each user the most variety in calling plans for any particular call.
Accordingly, while at least one embodiment of the present invention has been shown and described, it is to be understood that many changes and modifications may be made thereunto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
Claims (21)
1. A computerized method for determining which telephone service to use for a particular call selected from a plurality of phone services comprising using a processor which is programmed to perform the following steps:
providing a portable base station for housing the processor;
determining via the processor which of the phone services are available wherein the phone services are selected from the group comprising landline phone services, and wireless phone services;
determining via said portable base station a call quality for each phone service;
determining via the processor for at least one phone service the number of minutes left in a plan for that service;
determining via the processor the time and day of the week for a particular call;
determining via the processor the signal strength for the call;
determining via the processor whether the number to be dialed is part of a similar network or service provider as the service where the call is originating from;
determining via the processor whether the call is either local, toll free, or international; and
selecting a particular carrier in a said base station based upon both call an estimated call quality and an estimated price of the call;
automatically connecting a telephone call in said base station through the particular carrier and particular service selected from the group comprising landline phone services, and wireless phone services based upon the determined answers from all of said determination steps to provide a caller with a call having the desired characteristics of price and quality of the call.
2. The method as in claim 1 , wherein a system for connecting a telephone call selects a cell phone plan if the number being dialed is part of a similar or the same telephone network.
3. The method as in claim 1 , wherein a system for connecting a telephone call selects a particular telephone service based upon the number of free minutes left in a telephone service plan.
4. The method as in claim 1 , wherein said landline phone service comprises both analog phone service and voip phone service.
5. The method as in claim 1 , wherein said step of connecting a telephone call through the desired service occurs in said base station wherein said base station comprises a RJ11 connection, a ethernet connection and at least one wireless communication means through a SIM card.
6. The method as in claim 1 , further comprising the step of selecting a desired phone service based upon an estimated cost for the call.
7. The method as in claim 1 , further comprising the step of selecting a desired phone service based upon a perceived quality of reception of the call.
8. The method as in claim 1 further comprising the step of determining the service to select based upon the number dialed by the customer.
9. The method as in claim 1 , wherein said step of selecting a desired phone service comprises selecting a phone service based upon a balance between potential cost for the call and perceived reception quality of the call based upon a matrix of pre calculated values and which is stored in said base station.
10. The method as in claim 9 wherein said matrix is displayed on a screen on said base station.
11. The method as in claim 1 , wherein said matrix is stored in a handset on said base station.
12. The method as in claim 11 , wherein said matrix is programmable.
13. The method as in claim 12 , further comprising the step of adjusting a position on said matrix for determining which of said services to use.
14. The method as in claim 13 , further comprising the step of using at least one keypad to adjust a position on said matrix for determining which of said services to use.
15. The method as in claim 14 , further comprising the step of presetting a position on a matrix for a particular call based upon a particular number.
16. A method for determining which telephone service to use for a particular call comprising the following steps:
providing a portable base station;
determining in said portable base station a reception quality of a call to be placed;
determining via said base station which phone services are available wherein said phone services are selected from the group comprising: landline analog phone services, and voice over IP phone services;
determining for at least one phone service the number of minutes left in a plan for that service;
determining the time and day of the week for a particular call;
determining the signal strength for the call;
determining whether the number to be dialed is part of a similar network or service provider as the service where the call is originating from;
determining whether the call is either local, toll free, or international;
selecting a desired phone service in said base station; and
automatically connecting a telephone call through a base station to a desired carrier and to the desired service selected from the group comprising landline phone services, and wireless phone services based upon the determined answers from all of said determination steps, wherein said connection occurs in a base station for a phone to provide a caller with a call having the desired characteristics of price and quality of the call.
17. The method as in claim 16 , further comprising the step of determining the service to select based upon the number dialed by the customer.
18. The method as in claim 16 ,
wherein said step of selecting the desired phone service comprises determining based upon availability, reception quality and cost the proper phone service for selection via a matrix.
19. The method as in claim 18 , wherein said step of selecting a desired phone service includes utilizing a stored matrix of values for both reception and cost for an available service.
20. The method as in claim 16 , further comprising the step of:
recording in said portable base station historical reception quality information based upon previous calls from said portable base station.
21. The method as in claim 20 , further comprising the step of displaying said matrix on a screen on said portable base station.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/380,898 US7937069B2 (en) | 2005-04-29 | 2006-04-28 | System and process for switching between cell phone and landline services |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US67663205P | 2005-04-29 | 2005-04-29 | |
US11/380,898 US7937069B2 (en) | 2005-04-29 | 2006-04-28 | System and process for switching between cell phone and landline services |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20070037550A1 US20070037550A1 (en) | 2007-02-15 |
US7937069B2 true US7937069B2 (en) | 2011-05-03 |
Family
ID=37743164
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/380,898 Expired - Fee Related US7937069B2 (en) | 2005-04-29 | 2006-04-28 | System and process for switching between cell phone and landline services |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7937069B2 (en) |
Cited By (60)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20100188975A1 (en) * | 2009-01-28 | 2010-07-29 | Gregory G. Raleigh | Verifiable device assisted service policy implementation |
US20100198698A1 (en) * | 2009-01-28 | 2010-08-05 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Adaptive ambient services |
US20100255831A1 (en) * | 2009-04-07 | 2010-10-07 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Determining delay in a communications system |
US8275830B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2012-09-25 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Device assisted CDR creation, aggregation, mediation and billing |
US8340634B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2012-12-25 | Headwater Partners I, Llc | Enhanced roaming services and converged carrier networks with device assisted services and a proxy |
US8346225B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2013-01-01 | Headwater Partners I, Llc | Quality of service for device assisted services |
US8351898B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2013-01-08 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Verifiable device assisted service usage billing with integrated accounting, mediation accounting, and multi-account |
US8391834B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2013-03-05 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Security techniques for device assisted services |
US8402111B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2013-03-19 | Headwater Partners I, Llc | Device assisted services install |
US8478276B1 (en) * | 2011-12-26 | 2013-07-02 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Methods for transferring a communication session between companion devices |
US8548428B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2013-10-01 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Device group partitions and settlement platform |
US8589541B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2013-11-19 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Device-assisted services for protecting network capacity |
US8606911B2 (en) | 2009-03-02 | 2013-12-10 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Flow tagging for service policy implementation |
US8626115B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-01-07 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Wireless network service interfaces |
US8635335B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-01-21 | Headwater Partners I Llc | System and method for wireless network offloading |
US8725123B2 (en) | 2008-06-05 | 2014-05-13 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Communications device with secure data path processing agents |
US8745220B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-06-03 | Headwater Partners I Llc | System and method for providing user notifications |
US8793758B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-07-29 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Security, fraud detection, and fraud mitigation in device-assisted services systems |
US8832777B2 (en) | 2009-03-02 | 2014-09-09 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Adapting network policies based on device service processor configuration |
US8893009B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-11-18 | Headwater Partners I Llc | End user device that secures an association of application to service policy with an application certificate check |
US8898293B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-11-25 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Service offer set publishing to device agent with on-device service selection |
US8924543B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-12-30 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Service design center for device assisted services |
US8924469B2 (en) | 2008-06-05 | 2014-12-30 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Enterprise access control and accounting allocation for access networks |
US9094311B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2015-07-28 | Headwater Partners I, Llc | Techniques for attribution of mobile device data traffic to initiating end-user application |
US9154826B2 (en) | 2011-04-06 | 2015-10-06 | Headwater Partners Ii Llc | Distributing content and service launch objects to mobile devices |
US9253663B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2016-02-02 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Controlling mobile device communications on a roaming network based on device state |
US9351193B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2016-05-24 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Intermediate networking devices |
US9392462B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2016-07-12 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Mobile end-user device with agent limiting wireless data communication for specified background applications based on a stored policy |
US9413867B2 (en) * | 2012-01-06 | 2016-08-09 | Blackberry Limited | Communications system providing caller identification features based upon near field communication and related methods |
US9557889B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-01-31 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Service plan design, user interfaces, application programming interfaces, and device management |
US9565707B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-02-07 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Wireless end-user device with wireless data attribution to multiple personas |
US9571559B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-02-14 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Enhanced curfew and protection associated with a device group |
US9572019B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-02-14 | Headwater Partners LLC | Service selection set published to device agent with on-device service selection |
US9578182B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-02-21 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Mobile device and service management |
US9609510B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-03-28 | Headwater Research Llc | Automated credential porting for mobile devices |
US9647918B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-05-09 | Headwater Research Llc | Mobile device and method attributing media services network usage to requesting application |
US9706061B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-07-11 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Service design center for device assisted services |
US9755842B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-09-05 | Headwater Research Llc | Managing service user discovery and service launch object placement on a device |
US9858559B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2018-01-02 | Headwater Research Llc | Network service plan design |
US9955332B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2018-04-24 | Headwater Research Llc | Method for child wireless device activation to subscriber account of a master wireless device |
US9954975B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2018-04-24 | Headwater Research Llc | Enhanced curfew and protection associated with a device group |
US9980146B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2018-05-22 | Headwater Research Llc | Communications device with secure data path processing agents |
US10057775B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2018-08-21 | Headwater Research Llc | Virtualized policy and charging system |
US10064055B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2018-08-28 | Headwater Research Llc | Security, fraud detection, and fraud mitigation in device-assisted services systems |
US10200541B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2019-02-05 | Headwater Research Llc | Wireless end-user device with divided user space/kernel space traffic policy system |
US10237757B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2019-03-19 | Headwater Research Llc | System and method for wireless network offloading |
US10248996B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2019-04-02 | Headwater Research Llc | Method for operating a wireless end-user device mobile payment agent |
US10264138B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2019-04-16 | Headwater Research Llc | Mobile device and service management |
US10326800B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2019-06-18 | Headwater Research Llc | Wireless network service interfaces |
US10492102B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2019-11-26 | Headwater Research Llc | Intermediate networking devices |
US10715342B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2020-07-14 | Headwater Research Llc | Managing service user discovery and service launch object placement on a device |
US10779177B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2020-09-15 | Headwater Research Llc | Device group partitions and settlement platform |
US10783581B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2020-09-22 | Headwater Research Llc | Wireless end-user device providing ambient or sponsored services |
US10798252B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2020-10-06 | Headwater Research Llc | System and method for providing user notifications |
US10841839B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2020-11-17 | Headwater Research Llc | Security, fraud detection, and fraud mitigation in device-assisted services systems |
US11218854B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2022-01-04 | Headwater Research Llc | Service plan design, user interfaces, application programming interfaces, and device management |
US11412366B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2022-08-09 | Headwater Research Llc | Enhanced roaming services and converged carrier networks with device assisted services and a proxy |
US11973804B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2024-04-30 | Headwater Research Llc | Network service plan design |
US11985155B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2024-05-14 | Headwater Research Llc | Communications device with secure data path processing agents |
US12137004B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2024-11-05 | Headwater Research Llc | Device group partitions and settlement platform |
Families Citing this family (31)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20070002837A1 (en) * | 2005-07-01 | 2007-01-04 | Eric Tan | VOIP access cellphone adapter |
US8036367B2 (en) | 2007-03-19 | 2011-10-11 | Google Inc. | Flexible communication systems and methods |
CN101330722B (en) | 2007-06-18 | 2012-10-17 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method for controlling district access as well as user facility |
US8488757B1 (en) | 2009-05-28 | 2013-07-16 | Amdocs Software Systems Limited | System, method, and computer program product for determining a recommended device from a plurality of devices for initiating a phone call |
US11503084B2 (en) * | 2011-07-27 | 2022-11-15 | Vonage America Inc. | Systems and methods of providing communications services |
US10973059B2 (en) | 2011-07-27 | 2021-04-06 | Vonage America, Llc | Systems and methods of providing communications services |
US20130121214A1 (en) * | 2011-07-27 | 2013-05-16 | Vonage Network, Llc | Systems and methods of providing communications services |
US8767695B2 (en) * | 2012-06-27 | 2014-07-01 | Google Inc. | Measurement-based network selection |
US10143018B2 (en) | 2012-06-27 | 2018-11-27 | Google Llc | Computing device with wireless network selection feature |
EP2701374B1 (en) * | 2012-08-23 | 2016-01-13 | Arndt Mehlhorn | Telephone system and method |
US8582739B1 (en) * | 2012-11-15 | 2013-11-12 | Network Enhanced Telecom, Llp | Providing access to communication plans via multiple access methods |
US10491749B2 (en) | 2013-09-27 | 2019-11-26 | Google Llc | System and method for increased call quality and success rate |
US9628359B1 (en) | 2013-12-23 | 2017-04-18 | Google Inc. | Network selection using current and historical measurements |
US9736704B1 (en) | 2013-12-23 | 2017-08-15 | Google Inc. | Providing an overlay network using multiple underlying networks |
US9877188B1 (en) | 2014-01-03 | 2018-01-23 | Google Llc | Wireless network access credential sharing using a network based credential storage service |
US10341929B2 (en) | 2014-01-14 | 2019-07-02 | Google Llc | PSTN / VoIP communication system and method |
US9565578B2 (en) | 2014-06-18 | 2017-02-07 | Google Inc. | Method for collecting and aggregating network quality data |
US10412230B2 (en) | 2014-07-14 | 2019-09-10 | Google Llc | System and method for retail SIM marketplace |
US9814009B2 (en) | 2014-08-01 | 2017-11-07 | Google Llc | Multiple carrier attachment establishment and maintenance |
US9614915B2 (en) | 2014-08-18 | 2017-04-04 | Google Inc. | Seamless peer to peer internet connectivity |
US9942900B1 (en) | 2014-11-24 | 2018-04-10 | Google Llc | System and method for improved band-channel scanning and network switching |
US9648537B2 (en) | 2015-04-17 | 2017-05-09 | Google Inc. | Profile switching powered by location |
US10021618B2 (en) | 2015-04-30 | 2018-07-10 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | Apparatus and method for cloud assisted wireless mobility |
US10257782B2 (en) | 2015-07-30 | 2019-04-09 | Google Llc | Power management by powering off unnecessary radios automatically |
US9832716B2 (en) | 2015-08-12 | 2017-11-28 | Google Llc | Switching between networks based on quality of available networks |
US10341923B2 (en) | 2016-01-29 | 2019-07-02 | Google Llc | Techniques for minimizing user disruption during network connection switching |
US9980095B2 (en) | 2016-03-22 | 2018-05-22 | Google Llc | Method and apparatus for providing country detection on cellular devices using cell tower information |
US9980142B2 (en) | 2016-03-22 | 2018-05-22 | Google Llc | Methods and apparatus for SIM-based authentication of non-SIM devices |
US10225783B2 (en) | 2016-04-01 | 2019-03-05 | Google Llc | Method and apparatus for providing peer based network switching |
US10462734B2 (en) | 2016-10-31 | 2019-10-29 | Google Llc | Method, apparatus and system with carrier network switching control |
US11039364B2 (en) | 2018-09-28 | 2021-06-15 | Google Llc | Methods and apparatus for proactively switching between available networks |
Citations (40)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5138650A (en) | 1990-09-27 | 1992-08-11 | Motorola, Inc. | Cordless telephone with internal debit and credit memory |
US5638433A (en) | 1993-11-18 | 1997-06-10 | Best Rate, Inc. | Best rate telecommunication access code and data transceiver/facilitator (BRTF) |
US5987325A (en) | 1997-05-19 | 1999-11-16 | Motorola, Inc. | Multiple smart card phone and method |
US6058312A (en) * | 1995-12-21 | 2000-05-02 | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | Automatic selecting apparatus for an optimum wireless communication route |
US6078652A (en) | 1995-07-21 | 2000-06-20 | Call Manage, Ltd. | Least cost routing system |
US6240169B1 (en) | 1999-05-06 | 2001-05-29 | Mediacom Telesystems, Inc. | Communications protocol for least cost call routing system |
US20020065076A1 (en) | 1998-01-12 | 2002-05-30 | David A. Monroe | Apparatus and method for selection of circuit in multi-circuit communications device |
US6424706B1 (en) | 1999-03-31 | 2002-07-23 | Imagine Networks, Llc | Method and system for transferring telecommunication-time units among accounts and exchanging same for goods or services |
US6473499B1 (en) | 1999-03-12 | 2002-10-29 | Mediaring.Com Ltd. | Dynamic individual phone rates |
US6487283B2 (en) | 1998-08-04 | 2002-11-26 | Transnexus, Inc. | Pricing center for internet protocol routed transactions |
US6498938B1 (en) | 1999-12-13 | 2002-12-24 | James G. Morrow, Sr. | Wireless telephone-to-wired telephone system interfacing |
US6539237B1 (en) | 1998-11-09 | 2003-03-25 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for integrated wireless communications in private and public network environments |
US20040023652A1 (en) | 2002-07-31 | 2004-02-05 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Wireless personal communicator and communication method |
US6741835B2 (en) | 2001-01-12 | 2004-05-25 | Fred Pulver | Systems and methods for communications |
US6751462B1 (en) | 1999-04-30 | 2004-06-15 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Premises telephonic interface system for communicating using a hand-held wireless device |
US6795686B2 (en) | 2001-12-05 | 2004-09-21 | Quicksilver Technology | Method and system for increasing availability and proximity of base stations for cellular communications via mobile base stations |
US6804536B1 (en) | 1999-06-24 | 2004-10-12 | Parkervision, Inc. | Wireless communications interface |
US6804532B1 (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2004-10-12 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | System and method for re-routing communications based on wireless communication link quality |
US20040204033A1 (en) | 2002-10-17 | 2004-10-14 | Chia-Li Yang | Communication device connected to a first and a second communication networks |
US6813264B2 (en) | 2001-11-02 | 2004-11-02 | Qualcomm, Incorporated | System and method for routing voice over IP calls |
US20040235518A1 (en) | 2003-05-22 | 2004-11-25 | Beyette Fred R. | Hybrid telephone network utilizing wireless link and landline services |
US20040242230A1 (en) | 2003-05-29 | 2004-12-02 | Seon-Soo Rue | Complex wireless service arrangement using wired or wireless communication systems |
US20040259541A1 (en) | 2003-06-06 | 2004-12-23 | Hicks John A. | System and method for providing integrated voice and data services utilizing wired cordless access with unlicensed/unregulated spectrum and wired access with licensed/regulated spectrum |
US6836644B2 (en) | 2002-08-26 | 2004-12-28 | Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corporation | Methods and apparatus for establishing a fixed wireless telephone service |
US20040266478A1 (en) | 2003-06-27 | 2004-12-30 | King Anthony G. | Wireless phone adapter |
US20050009525A1 (en) | 2003-07-07 | 2005-01-13 | Tom Evslin | Wireless phone with interface to different networks |
US20050090283A1 (en) | 2003-10-28 | 2005-04-28 | Rodriquez Pablo R. | Wireless network access |
US20050101347A1 (en) | 2003-11-12 | 2005-05-12 | Shroeder Prudent | Communications device for a wireless and land-line network |
US20050107086A1 (en) | 2003-11-13 | 2005-05-19 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and gateway for controlling call routing |
US20050153736A1 (en) | 2004-01-05 | 2005-07-14 | Ganton Robert B. | Method and apparatus for associating with a communication system |
US6954643B2 (en) | 2003-06-25 | 2005-10-11 | Arraycomm Llc | Criteria for base station selection, including handover, in a wireless communication system |
US20050233749A1 (en) | 2004-04-16 | 2005-10-20 | Jeyhan Karaoguz | Method and system for extended network access notification via a broadband access gateway |
US6970692B2 (en) | 2001-04-12 | 2005-11-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Cell phone minute usage calculation and display |
US6970474B1 (en) | 1999-07-01 | 2005-11-29 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Personalized universal phone service |
US7003281B1 (en) | 2000-07-11 | 2006-02-21 | Oliver Wendel Gamble | Method and system for routing cellular calls to desired discount telephone services |
US7010107B1 (en) * | 2002-12-20 | 2006-03-07 | Yong Lee | Internet conference call bridge management system |
US7016673B2 (en) | 2002-10-01 | 2006-03-21 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Wireless communication method and system with controlled WTRU peer-to-peer communications |
US20060068795A1 (en) | 2004-09-27 | 2006-03-30 | Rami Caspi | System and method for optimizing mobility access |
US7197321B2 (en) * | 2003-02-25 | 2007-03-27 | Boston Communications Group, Inc. | Method and system for providing supervisory control over wireless phone usage |
US7443971B2 (en) * | 2003-05-05 | 2008-10-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Computer system with do not disturb system and method |
-
2006
- 2006-04-28 US US11/380,898 patent/US7937069B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (40)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5138650A (en) | 1990-09-27 | 1992-08-11 | Motorola, Inc. | Cordless telephone with internal debit and credit memory |
US5638433A (en) | 1993-11-18 | 1997-06-10 | Best Rate, Inc. | Best rate telecommunication access code and data transceiver/facilitator (BRTF) |
US6078652A (en) | 1995-07-21 | 2000-06-20 | Call Manage, Ltd. | Least cost routing system |
US6058312A (en) * | 1995-12-21 | 2000-05-02 | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | Automatic selecting apparatus for an optimum wireless communication route |
US5987325A (en) | 1997-05-19 | 1999-11-16 | Motorola, Inc. | Multiple smart card phone and method |
US20020065076A1 (en) | 1998-01-12 | 2002-05-30 | David A. Monroe | Apparatus and method for selection of circuit in multi-circuit communications device |
US6487283B2 (en) | 1998-08-04 | 2002-11-26 | Transnexus, Inc. | Pricing center for internet protocol routed transactions |
US6539237B1 (en) | 1998-11-09 | 2003-03-25 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for integrated wireless communications in private and public network environments |
US6473499B1 (en) | 1999-03-12 | 2002-10-29 | Mediaring.Com Ltd. | Dynamic individual phone rates |
US6424706B1 (en) | 1999-03-31 | 2002-07-23 | Imagine Networks, Llc | Method and system for transferring telecommunication-time units among accounts and exchanging same for goods or services |
US6751462B1 (en) | 1999-04-30 | 2004-06-15 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Premises telephonic interface system for communicating using a hand-held wireless device |
US6240169B1 (en) | 1999-05-06 | 2001-05-29 | Mediacom Telesystems, Inc. | Communications protocol for least cost call routing system |
US6804536B1 (en) | 1999-06-24 | 2004-10-12 | Parkervision, Inc. | Wireless communications interface |
US6970474B1 (en) | 1999-07-01 | 2005-11-29 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Personalized universal phone service |
US6498938B1 (en) | 1999-12-13 | 2002-12-24 | James G. Morrow, Sr. | Wireless telephone-to-wired telephone system interfacing |
US7003281B1 (en) | 2000-07-11 | 2006-02-21 | Oliver Wendel Gamble | Method and system for routing cellular calls to desired discount telephone services |
US6804532B1 (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2004-10-12 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | System and method for re-routing communications based on wireless communication link quality |
US6741835B2 (en) | 2001-01-12 | 2004-05-25 | Fred Pulver | Systems and methods for communications |
US6970692B2 (en) | 2001-04-12 | 2005-11-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Cell phone minute usage calculation and display |
US6813264B2 (en) | 2001-11-02 | 2004-11-02 | Qualcomm, Incorporated | System and method for routing voice over IP calls |
US6795686B2 (en) | 2001-12-05 | 2004-09-21 | Quicksilver Technology | Method and system for increasing availability and proximity of base stations for cellular communications via mobile base stations |
US20040023652A1 (en) | 2002-07-31 | 2004-02-05 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Wireless personal communicator and communication method |
US6836644B2 (en) | 2002-08-26 | 2004-12-28 | Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corporation | Methods and apparatus for establishing a fixed wireless telephone service |
US7016673B2 (en) | 2002-10-01 | 2006-03-21 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Wireless communication method and system with controlled WTRU peer-to-peer communications |
US20040204033A1 (en) | 2002-10-17 | 2004-10-14 | Chia-Li Yang | Communication device connected to a first and a second communication networks |
US7010107B1 (en) * | 2002-12-20 | 2006-03-07 | Yong Lee | Internet conference call bridge management system |
US7197321B2 (en) * | 2003-02-25 | 2007-03-27 | Boston Communications Group, Inc. | Method and system for providing supervisory control over wireless phone usage |
US7443971B2 (en) * | 2003-05-05 | 2008-10-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Computer system with do not disturb system and method |
US20040235518A1 (en) | 2003-05-22 | 2004-11-25 | Beyette Fred R. | Hybrid telephone network utilizing wireless link and landline services |
US20040242230A1 (en) | 2003-05-29 | 2004-12-02 | Seon-Soo Rue | Complex wireless service arrangement using wired or wireless communication systems |
US20040259541A1 (en) | 2003-06-06 | 2004-12-23 | Hicks John A. | System and method for providing integrated voice and data services utilizing wired cordless access with unlicensed/unregulated spectrum and wired access with licensed/regulated spectrum |
US6954643B2 (en) | 2003-06-25 | 2005-10-11 | Arraycomm Llc | Criteria for base station selection, including handover, in a wireless communication system |
US20040266478A1 (en) | 2003-06-27 | 2004-12-30 | King Anthony G. | Wireless phone adapter |
US20050009525A1 (en) | 2003-07-07 | 2005-01-13 | Tom Evslin | Wireless phone with interface to different networks |
US20050090283A1 (en) | 2003-10-28 | 2005-04-28 | Rodriquez Pablo R. | Wireless network access |
US20050101347A1 (en) | 2003-11-12 | 2005-05-12 | Shroeder Prudent | Communications device for a wireless and land-line network |
US20050107086A1 (en) | 2003-11-13 | 2005-05-19 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and gateway for controlling call routing |
US20050153736A1 (en) | 2004-01-05 | 2005-07-14 | Ganton Robert B. | Method and apparatus for associating with a communication system |
US20050233749A1 (en) | 2004-04-16 | 2005-10-20 | Jeyhan Karaoguz | Method and system for extended network access notification via a broadband access gateway |
US20060068795A1 (en) | 2004-09-27 | 2006-03-30 | Rami Caspi | System and method for optimizing mobility access |
Non-Patent Citations (28)
Title |
---|
Report # 12 for Intelligent Cellular Telephone Docking Station Group Leader Fred Rassam Dated Dec. 11, 2003. |
Report # 4 for Intelligent Cellular Telephone Docking Station, Group Leader Fred Rassam Dated Oct. 14, 2003. |
Report #1 for Intelligent Cellular Telephone Docking Station; Group Leader David Plum Dated Jan. 26, 2004. |
Report #10 for Intelligent Cellular Telephone Docking Station Group Leader, Fred Rassam, Dated Nov. 24, 2003. |
Report #10 Intelligent Cellular Telephone Docking Station Group Leader Daniel Svoboda Dated Apr. 5, 2004. |
Report #11 for Intelligent Cellular Telephone Docking Station Group Leader, Fred Rassam Dated Dec. 2, 2003. |
Report #11 Intelligent Cellular Telephone Docking Station Group Leader Daniel Svoboda Dated Apr. 12, 2004. |
Report #12 Intelligent Cellular Telephone Docking Station Group Leader Daniel Svoboda Dated Apr. 19, 2004. |
Report #2 for Intelligent Cellular Telephone Docking Station Group Leader Fred Rassam Dated Sep. 28, 2003. |
Report #2 for Intelligent Cellular Telephone Docking Station; Group Leader David Plum Dated Jan. 31, 2004. |
Report #3 for Intelligent Cellular Telephone Docking Station; Group Leader David Plum Dated Feb. 6, 2004. |
Report #3 for intelligent Cellular Telephone Docking Station; Group Leader Fred Rassam Dated Oct. 3, 2003. |
Report #5 Intelligent Cellular Telephone Docking Station Group Leader Daniel Svoboda Dated Feb. 23, 2004. |
Report #6 for Intelligent Cellular Telephone Docking Station Group Leader Fred Rassam, Dated Oct. 27, 2003. |
Report #6 Intelligent Cellular Telephone Docking Station Daniel Svoboda Dated Mar. 1, 2004. |
Report #7 for Intelligent Cellular Telephone Docking Station Group Leader Fred Rassam, Dated Nov. 3, 2003. |
Report #7 Intelligent Cellular Telephone Docking Station Group Leader Daniel Svoboda Dated Mar. 8, 2004. |
Report #8 for Intelligent Cellular Telephone Docking Station;Group Leader, Fred Rassam, Dated Nov. 10, 2003. |
Report #8 Intelligent Cellular Telephone Docking Station Group Leader Daniel Svoboda Dated Mar. 21, 2004. |
Report #9 for Intelligent Cellular Telephone Docking Station,Group Leader Fred Rassam Dated Nov. 17, 2003. |
Report #9 Intelligent Cellular Telephone Docking Station Group Leader Daniel Svoboda Dated Mar. 28, 2004. |
Report $5 for Intelligent Cellular Telephone Docking Station; Group Leader Fred Rassam Dated Oct. 20, 2003. |
Report Series 1 for Intelligent Cellular Telephone Docking Station; Group Leader Fred Rassam dated Sep. 21, 2003. |
Report#4 for Intelligent Cellular Telephone Docking Station; Group Leader Daniel Svoboda Dated Feb. 16, 2003. |
Senior Design Project Final Design Report Intelligent Cellular Telephone Docking Station; Fred Rassam, David Plum, Subhakam Misra; Daniel Svoboda, Advisor Bruce McNair Published Dec. 11, 2003. |
Senior Design Project Final Report Intelligent Cellular Telephone Docking Station; Fred Rassam, David Plum, Subhakam Misra; Daniel Svoboda, Advisor Bruce McNair Published May 15, 2004. |
Senior Design Project Interim Report Group # 20 Intelligent Cellular Docking Station Fred Rassam, David Plum, Subhakam Misra; Daniel Svoboda, Advisor Bruce McNair Published Oct. 14, 2003. |
Senior Design Project-Spring Semester Interim Report Group #20 Intelligent Cellular Telephone Docking Station; Dan Svoboda; Fred Rassam; Subhakam Misra; David Plum Published Mar. 22, 2004. |
Cited By (245)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8725123B2 (en) | 2008-06-05 | 2014-05-13 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Communications device with secure data path processing agents |
US8924469B2 (en) | 2008-06-05 | 2014-12-30 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Enterprise access control and accounting allocation for access networks |
US9386165B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2016-07-05 | Headwater Partners I Llc | System and method for providing user notifications |
US8570908B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2013-10-29 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Automated device provisioning and activation |
US20100188994A1 (en) * | 2009-01-28 | 2010-07-29 | Gregory G. Raleigh | Verifiable service billing for intermediate networking devices |
US20100191575A1 (en) * | 2009-01-28 | 2010-07-29 | Gregory G. Raleigh | Network based ambient services |
US20100191613A1 (en) * | 2009-01-28 | 2010-07-29 | Gregory G. Raleigh | Open transaction central billing system |
US20100198698A1 (en) * | 2009-01-28 | 2010-08-05 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Adaptive ambient services |
US12200786B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2025-01-14 | Headwater Research Llc | Enterprise access control and accounting allocation for access networks |
US8023425B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2011-09-20 | Headwater Partners I | Verifiable service billing for intermediate networking devices |
US8229812B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2012-07-24 | Headwater Partners I, Llc | Open transaction central billing system |
US8250207B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2012-08-21 | Headwater Partners I, Llc | Network based ambient services |
US8270310B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2012-09-18 | Headwater Partners I, Llc | Verifiable device assisted service policy implementation |
US8270952B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2012-09-18 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Open development system for access service providers |
US8275830B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2012-09-25 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Device assisted CDR creation, aggregation, mediation and billing |
US8321526B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2012-11-27 | Headwater Partners I, Llc | Verifiable device assisted service usage billing with integrated accounting, mediation accounting, and multi-account |
US8326958B1 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2012-12-04 | Headwater Partners I, Llc | Service activation tracking system |
US8331901B2 (en) * | 2009-01-28 | 2012-12-11 | Headwater Partners I, Llc | Device assisted ambient services |
US8340634B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2012-12-25 | Headwater Partners I, Llc | Enhanced roaming services and converged carrier networks with device assisted services and a proxy |
US8346225B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2013-01-01 | Headwater Partners I, Llc | Quality of service for device assisted services |
US8351898B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2013-01-08 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Verifiable device assisted service usage billing with integrated accounting, mediation accounting, and multi-account |
US8355337B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2013-01-15 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Network based service profile management with user preference, adaptive policy, network neutrality, and user privacy |
US8385916B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2013-02-26 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Automated device provisioning and activation |
US8391834B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2013-03-05 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Security techniques for device assisted services |
US8396458B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2013-03-12 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Automated device provisioning and activation |
US8402111B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2013-03-19 | Headwater Partners I, Llc | Device assisted services install |
US8406748B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2013-03-26 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Adaptive ambient services |
US12184700B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2024-12-31 | Headwater Research Llc | Automated device provisioning and activation |
US8437271B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2013-05-07 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Verifiable and accurate service usage monitoring for intermediate networking devices |
US8441989B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2013-05-14 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Open transaction central billing system |
US8467312B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2013-06-18 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Verifiable and accurate service usage monitoring for intermediate networking devices |
US8478667B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2013-07-02 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Automated device provisioning and activation |
US12166596B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2024-12-10 | Disney Enterprises, Inc. | Device-assisted services for protecting network capacity |
US8516552B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2013-08-20 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Verifiable service policy implementation for intermediate networking devices |
US8527630B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2013-09-03 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Adaptive ambient services |
US8531986B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2013-09-10 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Network tools for analysis, design, testing, and production of services |
US8547872B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2013-10-01 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Verifiable and accurate service usage monitoring for intermediate networking devices |
US8548428B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2013-10-01 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Device group partitions and settlement platform |
US9392462B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2016-07-12 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Mobile end-user device with agent limiting wireless data communication for specified background applications based on a stored policy |
US8583781B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2013-11-12 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Simplified service network architecture |
US8588110B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2013-11-19 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Verifiable device assisted service usage billing with integrated accounting, mediation accounting, and multi-account |
US8589541B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2013-11-19 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Device-assisted services for protecting network capacity |
US12143909B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2024-11-12 | Headwater Research Llc | Service plan design, user interfaces, application programming interfaces, and device management |
US8626115B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-01-07 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Wireless network service interfaces |
US8630611B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-01-14 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Automated device provisioning and activation |
US8630630B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-01-14 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Enhanced roaming services and converged carrier networks with device assisted services and a proxy |
US8630617B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-01-14 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Device group partitions and settlement platform |
US8630192B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-01-14 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Verifiable and accurate service usage monitoring for intermediate networking devices |
US8631102B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-01-14 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Automated device provisioning and activation |
US8634821B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-01-21 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Device assisted services install |
US8634805B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-01-21 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Device assisted CDR creation aggregation, mediation and billing |
US8635678B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-01-21 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Automated device provisioning and activation |
US8635335B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-01-21 | Headwater Partners I Llc | System and method for wireless network offloading |
US8640198B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-01-28 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Automated device provisioning and activation |
US8639935B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-01-28 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Automated device provisioning and activation |
US8639811B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-01-28 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Automated device provisioning and activation |
US8667571B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-03-04 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Automated device provisioning and activation |
US8666364B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-03-04 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Verifiable device assisted service usage billing with integrated accounting, mediation accounting, and multi-account |
US8675507B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-03-18 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Service profile management with user preference, adaptive policy, network neutrality and user privacy for intermediate networking devices |
US8688099B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-04-01 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Open development system for access service providers |
US8695073B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-04-08 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Automated device provisioning and activation |
US8713630B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-04-29 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Verifiable service policy implementation for intermediate networking devices |
US20100188990A1 (en) * | 2009-01-28 | 2010-07-29 | Gregory G. Raleigh | Network based service profile management with user preference, adaptive policy, network neutrality, and user privacy |
US8724554B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-05-13 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Open transaction central billing system |
US8737957B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-05-27 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Automated device provisioning and activation |
US8745220B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-06-03 | Headwater Partners I Llc | System and method for providing user notifications |
US8745191B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-06-03 | Headwater Partners I Llc | System and method for providing user notifications |
US8788661B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-07-22 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Device assisted CDR creation, aggregation, mediation and billing |
US8793758B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-07-29 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Security, fraud detection, and fraud mitigation in device-assisted services systems |
US8797908B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-08-05 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Automated device provisioning and activation |
US8799451B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-08-05 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Verifiable service policy implementation for intermediate networking devices |
US12137004B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2024-11-05 | Headwater Research Llc | Device group partitions and settlement platform |
US8839388B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-09-16 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Automated device provisioning and activation |
US8839387B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-09-16 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Roaming services network and overlay networks |
US8868455B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-10-21 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Adaptive ambient services |
US8886162B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-11-11 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Restricting end-user device communications over a wireless access network associated with a cost |
US8893009B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-11-18 | Headwater Partners I Llc | End user device that secures an association of application to service policy with an application certificate check |
US8898293B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-11-25 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Service offer set publishing to device agent with on-device service selection |
US8897744B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-11-25 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Device assisted ambient services |
US8897743B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-11-25 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Verifiable device assisted service usage billing with integrated accounting, mediation accounting, and multi-account |
US8898079B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-11-25 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Network based ambient services |
US8903452B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-12-02 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Device assisted ambient services |
US8924549B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-12-30 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Network based ambient services |
US8924543B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2014-12-30 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Service design center for device assisted services |
US20100191576A1 (en) * | 2009-01-28 | 2010-07-29 | Gregory G. Raleigh | Verifiable device assisted service usage billing with integrated accounting, mediation accounting, and multi-account |
US8948025B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2015-02-03 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Remotely configurable device agent for packet routing |
US9014026B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2015-04-21 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Network based service profile management with user preference, adaptive policy, network neutrality, and user privacy |
US9026079B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2015-05-05 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Wireless network service interfaces |
US9037127B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2015-05-19 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Device agent for remote user configuration of wireless network access |
US9094311B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2015-07-28 | Headwater Partners I, Llc | Techniques for attribution of mobile device data traffic to initiating end-user application |
US9137701B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2015-09-15 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Wireless end-user device with differentiated network access for background and foreground device applications |
US9137739B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2015-09-15 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Network based service policy implementation with network neutrality and user privacy |
US9143976B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2015-09-22 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Wireless end-user device with differentiated network access and access status for background and foreground device applications |
US12101434B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2024-09-24 | Headwater Research Llc | Device assisted CDR creation, aggregation, mediation and billing |
US9154428B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2015-10-06 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Wireless end-user device with differentiated network access selectively applied to different applications |
US9173104B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2015-10-27 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Mobile device with device agents to detect a disallowed access to a requested mobile data service and guide a multi-carrier selection and activation sequence |
US20100188975A1 (en) * | 2009-01-28 | 2010-07-29 | Gregory G. Raleigh | Verifiable device assisted service policy implementation |
US9179308B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2015-11-03 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Network tools for analysis, design, testing, and production of services |
US9179316B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2015-11-03 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Mobile device with user controls and policy agent to control application access to device location data |
US9179315B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2015-11-03 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Mobile device with data service monitoring, categorization, and display for different applications and networks |
US9198074B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2015-11-24 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Wireless end-user device with differential traffic control policy list and applying foreground classification to roaming wireless data service |
US9198042B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2015-11-24 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Security techniques for device assisted services |
US9198076B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2015-11-24 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Wireless end-user device with power-control-state-based wireless network access policy for background applications |
US9198075B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2015-11-24 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Wireless end-user device with differential traffic control policy list applicable to one of several wireless modems |
US9198117B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2015-11-24 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Network system with common secure wireless message service serving multiple applications on multiple wireless devices |
US9204374B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2015-12-01 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Multicarrier over-the-air cellular network activation server |
US9204282B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2015-12-01 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Enhanced roaming services and converged carrier networks with device assisted services and a proxy |
US9215613B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2015-12-15 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Wireless end-user device with differential traffic control policy list having limited user control |
US9215159B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2015-12-15 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Data usage monitoring for media data services used by applications |
US9220027B1 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2015-12-22 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Wireless end-user device with policy-based controls for WWAN network usage and modem state changes requested by specific applications |
US9225797B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2015-12-29 | Headwater Partners I Llc | System for providing an adaptive wireless ambient service to a mobile device |
US9232403B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2016-01-05 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Mobile device with common secure wireless message service serving multiple applications |
US9247450B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2016-01-26 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Quality of service for device assisted services |
US9253663B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2016-02-02 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Controlling mobile device communications on a roaming network based on device state |
US9258735B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2016-02-09 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Device-assisted services for protecting network capacity |
US9271184B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2016-02-23 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Wireless end-user device with per-application data limit and traffic control policy list limiting background application traffic |
US9270559B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2016-02-23 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Service policy implementation for an end-user device having a control application or a proxy agent for routing an application traffic flow |
US9277433B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2016-03-01 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Wireless end-user device with policy-based aggregation of network activity requested by applications |
US9277445B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2016-03-01 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Wireless end-user device with differential traffic control policy list and applying foreground classification to wireless data service |
US9319913B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2016-04-19 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Wireless end-user device with secure network-provided differential traffic control policy list |
US9351193B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2016-05-24 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Intermediate networking devices |
US9386121B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2016-07-05 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Method for providing an adaptive wireless ambient service to a mobile device |
US9179359B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2015-11-03 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Wireless end-user device with differentiated network access status for different device applications |
US20100192120A1 (en) * | 2009-01-28 | 2010-07-29 | Gregory G. Raleigh | Open development system for access service providers |
US8406733B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2013-03-26 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Automated device provisioning and activation |
US9491564B1 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2016-11-08 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Mobile device and method with secure network messaging for authorized components |
US9491199B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2016-11-08 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Security, fraud detection, and fraud mitigation in device-assisted services systems |
US9521578B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2016-12-13 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Wireless end-user device with application program interface to allow applications to access application-specific aspects of a wireless network access policy |
US9532261B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2016-12-27 | Headwater Partners I Llc | System and method for wireless network offloading |
US9532161B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2016-12-27 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Wireless device with application data flow tagging and network stack-implemented network access policy |
US9544397B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-01-10 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Proxy server for providing an adaptive wireless ambient service to a mobile device |
US9557889B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-01-31 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Service plan design, user interfaces, application programming interfaces, and device management |
US9565707B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-02-07 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Wireless end-user device with wireless data attribution to multiple personas |
US9565543B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-02-07 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Device group partitions and settlement platform |
US9571559B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-02-14 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Enhanced curfew and protection associated with a device group |
US9572019B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-02-14 | Headwater Partners LLC | Service selection set published to device agent with on-device service selection |
US9578182B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-02-21 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Mobile device and service management |
US9591474B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-03-07 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Adapting network policies based on device service processor configuration |
US9609510B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-03-28 | Headwater Research Llc | Automated credential porting for mobile devices |
US9609459B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-03-28 | Headwater Research Llc | Network tools for analysis, design, testing, and production of services |
US9609544B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-03-28 | Headwater Research Llc | Device-assisted services for protecting network capacity |
US9615192B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-04-04 | Headwater Research Llc | Message link server with plural message delivery triggers |
US9641957B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-05-02 | Headwater Research Llc | Automated device provisioning and activation |
US9647918B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-05-09 | Headwater Research Llc | Mobile device and method attributing media services network usage to requesting application |
US9674731B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-06-06 | Headwater Research Llc | Wireless device applying different background data traffic policies to different device applications |
US9706061B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-07-11 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Service design center for device assisted services |
US9705771B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-07-11 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Attribution of mobile device data traffic to end-user application based on socket flows |
US9749899B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-08-29 | Headwater Research Llc | Wireless end-user device with network traffic API to indicate unavailability of roaming wireless connection to background applications |
US9749898B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-08-29 | Headwater Research Llc | Wireless end-user device with differential traffic control policy list applicable to one of several wireless modems |
US9755842B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-09-05 | Headwater Research Llc | Managing service user discovery and service launch object placement on a device |
US9769207B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-09-19 | Headwater Research Llc | Wireless network service interfaces |
US9819808B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2017-11-14 | Headwater Research Llc | Hierarchical service policies for creating service usage data records for a wireless end-user device |
US9858559B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2018-01-02 | Headwater Research Llc | Network service plan design |
US9866642B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2018-01-09 | Headwater Research Llc | Wireless end-user device with wireless modem power state control policy for background applications |
US9942796B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2018-04-10 | Headwater Research Llc | Quality of service for device assisted services |
US9955332B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2018-04-24 | Headwater Research Llc | Method for child wireless device activation to subscriber account of a master wireless device |
US9954975B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2018-04-24 | Headwater Research Llc | Enhanced curfew and protection associated with a device group |
US9973930B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2018-05-15 | Headwater Research Llc | End user device that secures an association of application to service policy with an application certificate check |
US9980146B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2018-05-22 | Headwater Research Llc | Communications device with secure data path processing agents |
US10028144B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2018-07-17 | Headwater Research Llc | Security techniques for device assisted services |
US10057775B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2018-08-21 | Headwater Research Llc | Virtualized policy and charging system |
US10057141B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2018-08-21 | Headwater Research Llc | Proxy system and method for adaptive ambient services |
US10064033B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2018-08-28 | Headwater Research Llc | Device group partitions and settlement platform |
US10064055B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2018-08-28 | Headwater Research Llc | Security, fraud detection, and fraud mitigation in device-assisted services systems |
US10070305B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2018-09-04 | Headwater Research Llc | Device assisted services install |
US10080250B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2018-09-18 | Headwater Research Llc | Enterprise access control and accounting allocation for access networks |
US10165447B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2018-12-25 | Headwater Research Llc | Network service plan design |
US10171988B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2019-01-01 | Headwater Research Llc | Adapting network policies based on device service processor configuration |
US10171990B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2019-01-01 | Headwater Research Llc | Service selection set publishing to device agent with on-device service selection |
US11985155B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2024-05-14 | Headwater Research Llc | Communications device with secure data path processing agents |
US10171681B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2019-01-01 | Headwater Research Llc | Service design center for device assisted services |
US10200541B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2019-02-05 | Headwater Research Llc | Wireless end-user device with divided user space/kernel space traffic policy system |
US10237146B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2019-03-19 | Headwater Research Llc | Adaptive ambient services |
US10237757B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2019-03-19 | Headwater Research Llc | System and method for wireless network offloading |
US10237773B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2019-03-19 | Headwater Research Llc | Device-assisted services for protecting network capacity |
US10248996B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2019-04-02 | Headwater Research Llc | Method for operating a wireless end-user device mobile payment agent |
US10264138B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2019-04-16 | Headwater Research Llc | Mobile device and service management |
US10320990B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2019-06-11 | Headwater Research Llc | Device assisted CDR creation, aggregation, mediation and billing |
US10321320B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2019-06-11 | Headwater Research Llc | Wireless network buffered message system |
US10326800B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2019-06-18 | Headwater Research Llc | Wireless network service interfaces |
US10326675B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2019-06-18 | Headwater Research Llc | Flow tagging for service policy implementation |
US10462627B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2019-10-29 | Headwater Research Llc | Service plan design, user interfaces, application programming interfaces, and device management |
US10492102B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2019-11-26 | Headwater Research Llc | Intermediate networking devices |
US10536983B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2020-01-14 | Headwater Research Llc | Enterprise access control and accounting allocation for access networks |
US10582375B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2020-03-03 | Headwater Research Llc | Device assisted services install |
US10681179B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2020-06-09 | Headwater Research Llc | Enhanced curfew and protection associated with a device group |
US10694385B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2020-06-23 | Headwater Research Llc | Security techniques for device assisted services |
US10716006B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2020-07-14 | Headwater Research Llc | End user device that secures an association of application to service policy with an application certificate check |
US10715342B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2020-07-14 | Headwater Research Llc | Managing service user discovery and service launch object placement on a device |
US10749700B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2020-08-18 | Headwater Research Llc | Device-assisted services for protecting network capacity |
US10771980B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2020-09-08 | Headwater Research Llc | Communications device with secure data path processing agents |
US10779177B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2020-09-15 | Headwater Research Llc | Device group partitions and settlement platform |
US10783581B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2020-09-22 | Headwater Research Llc | Wireless end-user device providing ambient or sponsored services |
US10791471B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2020-09-29 | Headwater Research Llc | System and method for wireless network offloading |
US10798252B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2020-10-06 | Headwater Research Llc | System and method for providing user notifications |
US10798254B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2020-10-06 | Headwater Research Llc | Service design center for device assisted services |
US10798558B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2020-10-06 | Headwater Research Llc | Adapting network policies based on device service processor configuration |
US10803518B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2020-10-13 | Headwater Research Llc | Virtualized policy and charging system |
US10834577B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2020-11-10 | Headwater Research Llc | Service offer set publishing to device agent with on-device service selection |
US11973804B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2024-04-30 | Headwater Research Llc | Network service plan design |
US10841839B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2020-11-17 | Headwater Research Llc | Security, fraud detection, and fraud mitigation in device-assisted services systems |
US10848330B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2020-11-24 | Headwater Research Llc | Device-assisted services for protecting network capacity |
US10855559B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2020-12-01 | Headwater Research Llc | Adaptive ambient services |
US10869199B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2020-12-15 | Headwater Research Llc | Network service plan design |
US10985977B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2021-04-20 | Headwater Research Llc | Quality of service for device assisted services |
US11039020B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2021-06-15 | Headwater Research Llc | Mobile device and service management |
US11096055B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2021-08-17 | Headwater Research Llc | Automated device provisioning and activation |
US11134102B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2021-09-28 | Headwater Research Llc | Verifiable device assisted service usage monitoring with reporting, synchronization, and notification |
US11190427B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2021-11-30 | Headwater Research Llc | Flow tagging for service policy implementation |
US11190645B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2021-11-30 | Headwater Research Llc | Device assisted CDR creation, aggregation, mediation and billing |
US11190545B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2021-11-30 | Headwater Research Llc | Wireless network service interfaces |
US11218854B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2022-01-04 | Headwater Research Llc | Service plan design, user interfaces, application programming interfaces, and device management |
US11219074B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2022-01-04 | Headwater Research Llc | Enterprise access control and accounting allocation for access networks |
US11228617B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2022-01-18 | Headwater Research Llc | Automated device provisioning and activation |
US11337059B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2022-05-17 | Headwater Research Llc | Device assisted services install |
US11363496B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2022-06-14 | Headwater Research Llc | Intermediate networking devices |
US11405224B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2022-08-02 | Headwater Research Llc | Device-assisted services for protecting network capacity |
US11405429B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2022-08-02 | Headwater Research Llc | Security techniques for device assisted services |
US11412366B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2022-08-09 | Headwater Research Llc | Enhanced roaming services and converged carrier networks with device assisted services and a proxy |
US11425580B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2022-08-23 | Headwater Research Llc | System and method for wireless network offloading |
US11477246B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2022-10-18 | Headwater Research Llc | Network service plan design |
US11494837B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2022-11-08 | Headwater Research Llc | Virtualized policy and charging system |
US11516301B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2022-11-29 | Headwater Research Llc | Enhanced curfew and protection associated with a device group |
US11533642B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2022-12-20 | Headwater Research Llc | Device group partitions and settlement platform |
US11538106B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2022-12-27 | Headwater Research Llc | Wireless end-user device providing ambient or sponsored services |
US11563592B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2023-01-24 | Headwater Research Llc | Managing service user discovery and service launch object placement on a device |
US11570309B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2023-01-31 | Headwater Research Llc | Service design center for device assisted services |
US11582593B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2023-02-14 | Head Water Research Llc | Adapting network policies based on device service processor configuration |
US11589216B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2023-02-21 | Headwater Research Llc | Service selection set publishing to device agent with on-device service selection |
US11665592B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2023-05-30 | Headwater Research Llc | Security, fraud detection, and fraud mitigation in device-assisted services systems |
US11665186B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2023-05-30 | Headwater Research Llc | Communications device with secure data path processing agents |
US11968234B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2024-04-23 | Headwater Research Llc | Wireless network service interfaces |
US11750477B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2023-09-05 | Headwater Research Llc | Adaptive ambient services |
US11757943B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2023-09-12 | Headwater Research Llc | Automated device provisioning and activation |
US11923995B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2024-03-05 | Headwater Research Llc | Device-assisted services for protecting network capacity |
US11966464B2 (en) | 2009-01-28 | 2024-04-23 | Headwater Research Llc | Security techniques for device assisted services |
US8832777B2 (en) | 2009-03-02 | 2014-09-09 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Adapting network policies based on device service processor configuration |
US8606911B2 (en) | 2009-03-02 | 2013-12-10 | Headwater Partners I Llc | Flow tagging for service policy implementation |
US20100255831A1 (en) * | 2009-04-07 | 2010-10-07 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Determining delay in a communications system |
US9154826B2 (en) | 2011-04-06 | 2015-10-06 | Headwater Partners Ii Llc | Distributing content and service launch objects to mobile devices |
US8478276B1 (en) * | 2011-12-26 | 2013-07-02 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Methods for transferring a communication session between companion devices |
US9413867B2 (en) * | 2012-01-06 | 2016-08-09 | Blackberry Limited | Communications system providing caller identification features based upon near field communication and related methods |
US11743717B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2023-08-29 | Headwater Research Llc | Automated credential porting for mobile devices |
US10834583B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2020-11-10 | Headwater Research Llc | Automated credential porting for mobile devices |
US10171995B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2019-01-01 | Headwater Research Llc | Automated credential porting for mobile devices |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20070037550A1 (en) | 2007-02-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7937069B2 (en) | System and process for switching between cell phone and landline services | |
US20020193094A1 (en) | Method and system for downloading software products directly to wireless phones | |
JP3756964B2 (en) | Minimum cost routing device for separate connections into telephone lines. | |
US7280816B2 (en) | Techniques for monitoring mobile telecommunications for shared accounts | |
Buehler et al. | Mobile number portability | |
US20080051146A1 (en) | Base Unit for Communicating with a Cellular Telephone | |
US20020183048A1 (en) | Portable terminal service method | |
WO2008124447A1 (en) | Techniques for populating a contact list | |
US5793854A (en) | System for selection and monitoring telephone rates | |
US20080268812A1 (en) | Method and System For Prepaid Calls on Postpaid Bills | |
US7711350B2 (en) | Tracking communications usage time | |
US7277691B1 (en) | Method and system for management of call tones | |
JP4747005B2 (en) | Portable terminal device, transmission method, and program | |
KR100469410B1 (en) | Optimum fee pattern decision method for mobile communication terminal equipment | |
EP1189414A1 (en) | Communication service system and dedicated communication terminal used in it | |
WO2003009622A1 (en) | Method and device for selecting the most suitable and the most cost-effective network | |
JP4667257B2 (en) | Billing processing system and billing processing method | |
CN101895645A (en) | VOIP system for simulating PSTN using habit and mobile phone | |
JP3803568B2 (en) | Portable communication device | |
US20060246873A1 (en) | Method for making calling card telephone calls using a mobile telephone | |
US8139724B2 (en) | Method and system for incorporating audio clips during a voice call | |
KR101076594B1 (en) | Method for providing mobile service in wireless terminal | |
Flanagan | Calling party pays: Is anyone listening to the customer? | |
JP2005191836A (en) | Method and server for assigning telephone number of portable telephone | |
KR200352437Y1 (en) | Mobile Phone for Auto-Connecting to PSTN Network |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY |
|
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY |
|
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20190503 |