Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

US20100036551A1 - Method and device for assisting an aircraft flight control during landing approach - Google Patents

Method and device for assisting an aircraft flight control during landing approach Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20100036551A1
US20100036551A1 US11/911,611 US91161106A US2010036551A1 US 20100036551 A1 US20100036551 A1 US 20100036551A1 US 91161106 A US91161106 A US 91161106A US 2010036551 A1 US2010036551 A1 US 2010036551A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
aircraft
approach
distance
minimum
ground
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US11/911,611
Other versions
US8346412B2 (en
Inventor
Isabelle Lacaze
Vincent Foucart
Jean-Louis De Menorval
Didier Zadrozynski
Frederic Lemoult
Joelle Barthe
Sebastien Lhote
Irene Hoste Ventos
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Airbus Operations SAS
Original Assignee
Airbus Operations SAS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Airbus Operations SAS filed Critical Airbus Operations SAS
Assigned to AIRBUS FRANCE reassignment AIRBUS FRANCE ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BARTHE, JOELLE, DE MENORVAL, JEAN-LOUIS, FOUCART, VINCENT, HOSTE VENTOS, IRENE, LACAZE, ISABELLE, LEMOULT, FREDERIC, LHOTE, SEBASTIEN, ZADROZYNSKI, DIDIER
Publication of US20100036551A1 publication Critical patent/US20100036551A1/en
Assigned to AIRBUS OPERATIONS SAS reassignment AIRBUS OPERATIONS SAS MERGER (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: AIRBUS FRANCE
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US8346412B2 publication Critical patent/US8346412B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05DSYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
    • G05D1/00Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots
    • G05D1/04Control of altitude or depth
    • G05D1/06Rate of change of altitude or depth
    • G05D1/0607Rate of change of altitude or depth specially adapted for aircraft
    • G05D1/0653Rate of change of altitude or depth specially adapted for aircraft during a phase of take-off or landing
    • G05D1/0676Rate of change of altitude or depth specially adapted for aircraft during a phase of take-off or landing specially adapted for landing
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01CMEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
    • G01C23/00Combined instruments indicating more than one navigational value, e.g. for aircraft; Combined measuring devices for measuring two or more variables of movement, e.g. distance, speed or acceleration
    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08GTRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G5/00Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
    • G08G5/02Automatic approach or landing aids, i.e. systems in which flight data of incoming planes are processed to provide landing data
    • G08G5/025Navigation or guidance aids

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method and a device for aiding the piloting of an aircraft, in particular of a transport aircraft, during an approach phase for the purpose of landing on an airport landing runway.
  • a go-around is a generally tricky maneuver which is often carried out too late since it is not desired.
  • a go-around is in fact often still considered to be a failure for pilots. So, pilots will in general seek to avoid it to the maximum, if necessary by trying to rescue a difficult situation.
  • the present invention relates to a method of aiding the piloting of an aircraft during an approach phase for the purpose of landing, and more precisely to a method of aiding the management of energy in the approach, which is aimed at aiding the pilot to take his decision as to whether or not to interrupt the approach phase with a go-around maneuver, in particular by indicating to him all the energy margins for attaining a stabilized approach.
  • a) current flight conditions of the aircraft are determined; b) a minimum approach distance which corresponds to a minimum distance between projections onto a horizontal plane of the current position of the aircraft and of a position of contact with the ground is determined, with the aid of said current flight conditions and of a predetermined model, when the aircraft descends and decelerates in accordance with an optimized approach so as to achieve stabilized approach conditions; and c) at least this minimum approach distance is presented to a pilot of the aircraft, on a navigation screen of ND (“Navigation Display”) type, in the form of a first circular arc which is centered on a position relating to the aircraft and which illustrates the position of contact with the ground (and provides a distance cue). Said position relating to the aircraft corresponds to the position that the aircraft has if it is situated on a prescribed trajectory for the purpose of landing or by default to the current position of said aircraft.
  • ND Navigation Display
  • the pilot knows his aircraft's position of contact with the ground (and therefore his margin in relation to the runway) if he implements an optimized approach, for which the horizontal distance from the current position of the aircraft up to the contact position of the aircraft on the landing runway is the smallest possible, as a function in particular of the aerodynamic braking capabilities of the aircraft (taken into account in said model) and of the current flight conditions.
  • step c) a symbol which illustrates the position of a landing runway scheduled for the landing and which indicates at least the threshold of this landing runway is presented moreover, on said navigation screen, said first circular arc being situated on the lateral trajectory of the aircraft, on which said symbol illustrating the position of the landing runway is also presumed to be situated.
  • said stabilized approach conditions assume that the aircraft exhibits a predetermined approach speed and approach slope that are stabilized (that is to say constant) at a predetermined height relative to the ground, for example 500 feet (about 150 meters) or 1000 feet (about 300 meters), down to a height, for example 50 feet (about 15 meters), in direct proximity to the landing runway.
  • an alert signal is emitted in the flight deck of the aircraft, when said first circular arc is situated beyond the threshold of the landing runway (with respect to the current position of the aircraft), that is to say when the position of the contact point of the aircraft (relating to an optimized approach such as previously indicated) is situated beyond said threshold of the landing runway so that the landing will not be able to be carried out at all, or at the very least not under good safety conditions.
  • step a) at least the following are determined (more precisely, are estimated or are measured in a customary manner) as current flight conditions of the aircraft:
  • said model intended for determining the minimum approach distance as a function of the current flight conditions comprises a neural net.
  • said neural net determines said minimum approach distance, as a function of said current flight conditions and of said stabilized approach conditions, as well as at least of the following parameters:
  • said neural net depends on the type of said aircraft, in particular its aerodynamic characteristics and its performance. This makes it possible to optimize the model and to adapt it to the aircraft on which the present invention is implemented.
  • said neural net is determined during a preliminary step, prior to the flight of the aircraft.
  • said minimum approach distance is determined by taking into account an optimal descent profile as a function of said current flight conditions.
  • a second approach distance which corresponds to a distance between projections onto a horizontal plane of the current position of the aircraft and of a position of contact with the ground is determined, when the aircraft descends and decelerates in accordance with a standard approach (in relation to aeronautical directives) so as to achieve the stabilized approach conditions;
  • this second approach distance is presented to the pilot of the aircraft on said navigation screen in the form of a second circular arc which is centered on said position relating to the aircraft and which illustrates the position of contact with the ground (relating to a standard approach).
  • the present invention also relates to a device for aiding the piloting of an aircraft, in particular of a transport aircraft, during an approach phase for the purpose of landing on an airport landing runway.
  • said device is noteworthy in that it comprises:
  • display means for presenting, on a navigation screen, at least this minimum approach distance in the form of a first circular arc which is centered on the (aforesaid) position relating to the aircraft and which illustrates the position of contact with the ground.
  • said second means comprise a neural net.
  • said device in accordance with the invention comprises, moreover, alert means capable of emitting an alert signal (audible and/or visual) in the flight deck of the aircraft, when said first circular arc is situated beyond the threshold of a landing runway scheduled for the landing.
  • alert means capable of emitting an alert signal (audible and/or visual) in the flight deck of the aircraft, when said first circular arc is situated beyond the threshold of a landing runway scheduled for the landing.
  • FIG. 1 is the schematic diagram of a device for aiding piloting in accordance with the invention.
  • FIG. 2 shows a navigation screen comprising the information presented in accordance with the present invention.
  • FIGS. 3 to 5 represent a part of the navigation screen of FIG. 2 , respectively for different approach phases.
  • FIG. 6 is a graphic illustrating various approach trajectories capable of being followed by an aircraft, in accordance with the present invention, for the purpose of a landing on a landing runway.
  • the device 1 in accordance with the invention and schematically represented in FIG. 1 is intended to aid a pilot to pilot an aircraft A, in particular a wide-bodied transport aircraft, during the approach to a landing runway 2 for the purpose of a landing on this runway 2 .
  • said device 1 comprises:
  • a set 3 of information sources which comprise at least means 4 for determining, in particular for measuring or estimating, in a customary manner, current flight conditions of the aircraft A. More precisely, said means 4 determine at least the following current flight conditions:
  • a central unit 5 which is connected by a link 6 to said set 3 of information sources, and which determines, with the aid of the current flight conditions received from said means 4 and of a predetermined model specified below, a minimum approach distance Dmin which corresponds to a minimum distance (profile achievable by the pilot) between first and second projections onto a horizontal plane, on the one hand of the current position of the aircraft A and, on the other hand of a position of contact with the ground of said aircraft A, when the latter descends and decelerates from its current position, in accordance with an optimized approach specified below, so as to achieve stabilized approach conditions, also specified hereinafter; and
  • ND Navigation Display
  • Dmin distance between the aircraft A and the central unit 5 and which are intended to present, on a customary navigation screen 9 of ND (“Navigation Display”) type, at least this minimum approach distance Dmin, in the form of a circular arc C 1 which is centered on a position relating to the aircraft A.
  • Said position relating to the aircraft A corresponds to the position that the aircraft A has if it is situated on a prescribed trajectory for the purpose of landing or by default to the current position of said aircraft A, illustrated in a customary manner by a symbol 10 .
  • the circular arc C 1 is separated from said symbol 10 by a distance representative of this distance Dmin.
  • This circular arc C 1 shows the contact position of the aircraft A with the ground if it carries out an optimized approach making it possible to obtain the smallest possible distance Dmin. It also provides the pilot with distance information (aircraft-contact position).
  • said device 1 at any instant the pilot knows his aircraft's A position of contact with the ground if he implements an optimized approach, for which the horizontal distance from the current position of the aircraft A up to the contact position of the aircraft A on the landing runway 2 , is the smallest possible, as a function in particular of the aerodynamic braking capabilities of the aircraft A (taken into account in said model) and of the current flight conditions (received from said means 4 ).
  • said display means 7 present moreover, on said navigation screen 9 , a symbol 11 which illustrates the position of the landing runway 2 scheduled for the landing of the aircraft A and which signals at least the position of the upstream threshold 12 of said landing runway 2 .
  • said circular arc C 1 is situated by definition on the lateral trajectory 13 which is followed by the aircraft A and which passes through said symbol 11 on the navigation screen 9 , so as to direct the aircraft A towards the landing runway 2 .
  • the device 1 in accordance with the invention affords the pilot valuable aid in taking his decision to possibly interrupt an approach phase, since by virtue of this information he knows when the approach is nonstabilized and nonrecoverable. In such a situation, he need then no longer hesitate to carry out a go-around maneuver. This will without doubt make it possible to avoid numerous incidents and accidents during the approach phase.
  • a go-around is a flight phase during which the landing operations in progress are not carried through to completion.
  • said central unit 5 determines an approach distance DO which corresponds to a distance between first and third projections onto a horizontal plane, on the one hand of the current position of the aircraft A and, on the other hand of a position of contact with the ground, when the aircraft A descends and decelerates from its current position, in accordance with a standard approach (that is to say in accordance with an approach which is carried out in a regulatory and customary manner) so as to achieve said stabilized approach conditions; and
  • said display means 7 present, on said navigation screen 9 , this approach distance DO in the form of a circular arc C 2 which is also centered on the aforesaid position relating to the aircraft A (symbol 10 ) and which illustrates the position of contact with the ground for a standard approach such as this.
  • said stabilized approach conditions assume that the aircraft A exhibits a predetermined approach speed and approach slope that are stabilized (that is to say constant) at a predetermined height relative to the ground, for example 500 feet (about 150 meters) or 1000 feet (about 300 meters), down to a height, for example 50 feet (about 15 meters), in direct proximity to the landing runway 2 .
  • FIGS. 3 to 5 show a part 14 of the navigation screen 9 comprising in particular the circular arcs C 1 and C 2 and the symbol 11 :
  • the circular arcs C 1 and C 2 are situated upstream of the threshold 12 of the landing runway (symbol 11 ) in the direction E of flight of the aircraft A so that the aircraft A can in this example carry out an approach, both in accordance with an optimized approach and in accordance with a standard approach;
  • the circular arc C 1 (optimized approach) is situated upstream of the threshold 12 of the landing runway 2
  • the circular arc C 2 (standard approach) is situated beyond (downstream) said threshold 12 of the landing runway 2 .
  • the aircraft A cannot carry out a standard approach.
  • an optimized approach is still possible;
  • the two circular arcs C 1 and C 2 are situated beyond (downstream) the threshold 12 of the landing runway 2 so that neither a standard approach nor an optimized approach are possible. In this example, the pilot must therefore implement a go-around maneuver.
  • the display means 7 present, moreover, in a customary manner, on the navigation screen 9 , in particular:
  • a customary graduation 17 in distance defined with respect to the current position of the aircraft A illustrated by the symbol 10 .
  • the device 1 in accordance with the invention comprises, moreover, alert means 18 which are connected by a link 19 to said central unit 5 and which are capable of emitting an alert signal in the flight deck of the aircraft A, when said circular arc C 1 is situated beyond the threshold 12 of the landing runway 2 (with respect to the current position of the aircraft A), that is to say when the position of the contact point of the aircraft A (relating to an optimized approach such as previously indicated) is situated beyond said threshold 12 of the landing runway 2 so that the landing will not be able to be carried out at all, or at the very least not under good safety conditions.
  • alert means 18 which are connected by a link 19 to said central unit 5 and which are capable of emitting an alert signal in the flight deck of the aircraft A, when said circular arc C 1 is situated beyond the threshold 12 of the landing runway 2 (with respect to the current position of the aircraft A), that is to say when the position of the contact point of the aircraft A (relating to an optimized approach such as previously indicated) is situated beyond said threshold 12 of the landing runway 2 so that the landing will not be
  • Said alert signal can be an audible signal and/or a visual signal, in particular an alert message and/or a change of color or of shape pertaining to information displayed on the navigation screen 9 , such as the circular arc C 1 and/or the symbol 11 for example.
  • the device 1 in accordance with the invention, indications are made available to the pilot which allow him to manage the energy of the aircraft A and, if appropriate, to perform corrections on the energy state or if necessary a go-around. Said device 1 thus makes it possible to reduce the number of incidents during approach phases.
  • the incidents which are covered by said device 1 are in particular runway exits, hard landings, results of nonstabilized approaches caused by surplus energy (too high, too quick).
  • this calculation module 20 comprises a neural net.
  • this neural net makes it possible to determine said minimum approach distance Dmin, as a function of said current flight conditions and of said stabilized approach conditions, as well as of the following parameters:
  • said neural net depends on the type of said aircraft A, in particular its characteristics and aerodynamic performance. This makes it possible to optimize the model and to adapt it to the aircraft A on which the device 1 is installed.
  • said neural net is determined on the ground during a preliminary step, prior to the flight of the aircraft A.
  • said calculation module 20 determines said minimum approach distance Dmin, by taking into account an optimal descent profile as a function of said current flight conditions of the aircraft A.
  • FIG. 6 Represented in FIG. 6 are various (descent) profiles referenced P 0 to P 4 , making it possible to carry out a landing on the runway 2 by overflying the relief 21 of the surrounding terrain 22 , as well as a height scale 23 whose values H 1 to H 5 signalled are for example separated each time by 50 feet (about 15 meters).
  • Said reference profiles P 0 to P 4 are optimal energy loss profiles which cover all the initial altitude and speed conditions of the aircraft A.
  • the central unit 5 chooses the energy loss profile P 0 , P 1 , P 2 , P 3 , P 4 which is optimal (which makes it possible in particular to obtain the smallest distance Dmin), and the calculation module 20 uses said profile to calculate said distance Dmin in accordance with said integrated model.
  • VLO Maximum Landing Gear Operating Speed
  • This vertical approach axis is an axis PA (termed “glide”) which is issued within the framework of a customary instrument approach and landing of ILS (“Instrument Landing System”) type;

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
  • Navigation (AREA)
  • Variable-Direction Aerials And Aerial Arrays (AREA)

Abstract

The inventive flight control assisting device comprises first means (4) for determining the actual aircraft flight conditions, second means (5) for determining, with the aid of said actual flight conditions and a predetermined pattern, a minimum approaching distance corresponding to a minimum distance between projections on the horizontal plane of the aircraft actual position and a touch-down point when said aircraft moves downwards and decelerates according to an optimised approach in such a way that stabilised approaching conditions are attained, and display means (7) for displaying at least said minimum approaching distance on a navigation screen (9) in the form of a first circular arc focused on a position relative to the aircraft which displays the touch-down position.

Description

  • The present invention relates to a method and a device for aiding the piloting of an aircraft, in particular of a transport aircraft, during an approach phase for the purpose of landing on an airport landing runway.
  • It is known that a significant proportion of aircraft accidents occur during an approach phase for the purpose of landing. The main causes of accidents relate in general to:
      • unanticipated meteorological conditions;
      • inappropriate reactions of pilots;
      • a nonoptimal aerodynamic configuration of the aircraft; and
      • a nonstabilized approach of the aircraft (which is too high and/or arrives too quickly).
  • In most cases, had the crews of the aircraft been aware that the real situation of their aircraft did not allow a landing to be carried out under good safety conditions, they would have been able to avoid these incidents by performing a go-around.
  • It is also known that a go-around is a generally tricky maneuver which is often carried out too late since it is not desired. A go-around is in fact often still considered to be a failure for pilots. So, pilots will in general seek to avoid it to the maximum, if necessary by trying to rescue a difficult situation.
  • However, if such a go-around maneuver were carried out wittingly whenever necessary, it would make it possible to avoid numerous incidents and accidents that occur in the approach phase (approach to a runway and landing on this runway).
  • The present invention relates to a method of aiding the piloting of an aircraft during an approach phase for the purpose of landing, and more precisely to a method of aiding the management of energy in the approach, which is aimed at aiding the pilot to take his decision as to whether or not to interrupt the approach phase with a go-around maneuver, in particular by indicating to him all the energy margins for attaining a stabilized approach.
  • For this purpose, according to the invention, said method is noteworthy in that the following series of successive steps is carried out in an automatic and repetitive manner:
  • a) current flight conditions of the aircraft are determined;
    b) a minimum approach distance which corresponds to a minimum distance between projections onto a horizontal plane of the current position of the aircraft and of a position of contact with the ground is determined, with the aid of said current flight conditions and of a predetermined model, when the aircraft descends and decelerates in accordance with an optimized approach so as to achieve stabilized approach conditions; and
    c) at least this minimum approach distance is presented to a pilot of the aircraft, on a navigation screen of ND (“Navigation Display”) type, in the form of a first circular arc which is centered on a position relating to the aircraft and which illustrates the position of contact with the ground (and provides a distance cue). Said position relating to the aircraft corresponds to the position that the aircraft has if it is situated on a prescribed trajectory for the purpose of landing or by default to the current position of said aircraft.
  • Thus, by virtue of the invention, at any instant the pilot knows his aircraft's position of contact with the ground (and therefore his margin in relation to the runway) if he implements an optimized approach, for which the horizontal distance from the current position of the aircraft up to the contact position of the aircraft on the landing runway is the smallest possible, as a function in particular of the aerodynamic braking capabilities of the aircraft (taken into account in said model) and of the current flight conditions.
  • In an advantageous manner, in step c), a symbol which illustrates the position of a landing runway scheduled for the landing and which indicates at least the threshold of this landing runway is presented moreover, on said navigation screen, said first circular arc being situated on the lateral trajectory of the aircraft, on which said symbol illustrating the position of the landing runway is also presumed to be situated.
  • Thus, when on said navigation screen said first circular arc oversteps said threshold of the landing runway illustrated by this symbol, the pilot knows that it will be impossible for him to achieve stabilized approach conditions for the purpose of carrying out the landing on said landing runway, unless perhaps he changes his lateral profile.
  • According to the invention, said stabilized approach conditions assume that the aircraft exhibits a predetermined approach speed and approach slope that are stabilized (that is to say constant) at a predetermined height relative to the ground, for example 500 feet (about 150 meters) or 1000 feet (about 300 meters), down to a height, for example 50 feet (about 15 meters), in direct proximity to the landing runway.
  • Consequently, by virtue of said first circular arc and of said symbol presented on the navigation screen, the pilot is afforded valuable aid in taking his decision to possibly interrupt an approach phase, since by virtue of this information he knows when the approach is nonstabilized and nonrecoverable. In such a situation, he need then no longer hesitate to carry out a go-around maneuver (or an energy loss maneuver). This will without doubt make it possible to avoid numerous incidents and accidents during the approach phase and to better manage the approach so as to reduce the number of go-arounds.
  • To properly apprise the pilot of any critical situation of the aforesaid type, advantageously, an alert signal is emitted in the flight deck of the aircraft, when said first circular arc is situated beyond the threshold of the landing runway (with respect to the current position of the aircraft), that is to say when the position of the contact point of the aircraft (relating to an optimized approach such as previously indicated) is situated beyond said threshold of the landing runway so that the landing will not be able to be carried out at all, or at the very least not under good safety conditions.
  • In a particular embodiment, in step a) at least the following are determined (more precisely, are estimated or are measured in a customary manner) as current flight conditions of the aircraft:
  • the height of the aircraft with respect to the ground;
  • the speed of the aircraft; and
  • the aerodynamic configuration of said aircraft.
  • Furthermore, advantageously, said model intended for determining the minimum approach distance as a function of the current flight conditions comprises a neural net. In this case, preferably, said neural net determines said minimum approach distance, as a function of said current flight conditions and of said stabilized approach conditions, as well as at least of the following parameters:
  • the atmospheric pressure at ground level;
  • the mass of the aircraft; and
  • the longitudinal instantaneous wind.
  • Moreover, in a particular embodiment, said neural net depends on the type of said aircraft, in particular its aerodynamic characteristics and its performance. This makes it possible to optimize the model and to adapt it to the aircraft on which the present invention is implemented.
  • Advantageously, said neural net is determined during a preliminary step, prior to the flight of the aircraft.
  • Furthermore, in an advantageous manner, said minimum approach distance is determined by taking into account an optimal descent profile as a function of said current flight conditions.
  • In a particular embodiment, moreover:
  • in step b), a second approach distance which corresponds to a distance between projections onto a horizontal plane of the current position of the aircraft and of a position of contact with the ground is determined, when the aircraft descends and decelerates in accordance with a standard approach (in relation to aeronautical directives) so as to achieve the stabilized approach conditions; and
  • in step c), this second approach distance is presented to the pilot of the aircraft on said navigation screen in the form of a second circular arc which is centered on said position relating to the aircraft and which illustrates the position of contact with the ground (relating to a standard approach).
  • The present invention also relates to a device for aiding the piloting of an aircraft, in particular of a transport aircraft, during an approach phase for the purpose of landing on an airport landing runway.
  • According to the invention, said device is noteworthy in that it comprises:
  • first means for determining current flight conditions of the aircraft;
  • second means for determining, with the aid of said current flight conditions and of a predetermined model, a minimum approach distance which corresponds to a minimum distance between projections onto a horizontal plane of the current position of the aircraft and of a position of contact with the ground, when the aircraft descends and decelerates in accordance with an optimized approach so as to achieve stabilized approach conditions; and
  • display means for presenting, on a navigation screen, at least this minimum approach distance in the form of a first circular arc which is centered on the (aforesaid) position relating to the aircraft and which illustrates the position of contact with the ground.
  • Preferably, said second means comprise a neural net.
  • Furthermore, in a particular embodiment, said device in accordance with the invention comprises, moreover, alert means capable of emitting an alert signal (audible and/or visual) in the flight deck of the aircraft, when said first circular arc is situated beyond the threshold of a landing runway scheduled for the landing.
  • The figures of the appended drawing will elucidate the manner in which the invention can be carried out. In these figures, identical references designate similar elements.
  • FIG. 1 is the schematic diagram of a device for aiding piloting in accordance with the invention.
  • FIG. 2 shows a navigation screen comprising the information presented in accordance with the present invention.
  • FIGS. 3 to 5 represent a part of the navigation screen of FIG. 2, respectively for different approach phases.
  • FIG. 6 is a graphic illustrating various approach trajectories capable of being followed by an aircraft, in accordance with the present invention, for the purpose of a landing on a landing runway.
  • The device 1 in accordance with the invention and schematically represented in FIG. 1 is intended to aid a pilot to pilot an aircraft A, in particular a wide-bodied transport aircraft, during the approach to a landing runway 2 for the purpose of a landing on this runway 2.
  • According to the invention, said device 1 comprises:
  • a set 3 of information sources which comprise at least means 4 for determining, in particular for measuring or estimating, in a customary manner, current flight conditions of the aircraft A. More precisely, said means 4 determine at least the following current flight conditions:
  • the height of the aircraft A with respect to the ground;
  • the speed of the aircraft A; and
  • the aerodynamic configuration (positions of the slats and flaps in particular) of said aircraft A;
  • a central unit 5 which is connected by a link 6 to said set 3 of information sources, and which determines, with the aid of the current flight conditions received from said means 4 and of a predetermined model specified below, a minimum approach distance Dmin which corresponds to a minimum distance (profile achievable by the pilot) between first and second projections onto a horizontal plane, on the one hand of the current position of the aircraft A and, on the other hand of a position of contact with the ground of said aircraft A, when the latter descends and decelerates from its current position, in accordance with an optimized approach specified below, so as to achieve stabilized approach conditions, also specified hereinafter; and
  • display means 7 which are connected by a link 8 to said central unit 5 and which are intended to present, on a customary navigation screen 9 of ND (“Navigation Display”) type, at least this minimum approach distance Dmin, in the form of a circular arc C1 which is centered on a position relating to the aircraft A. Said position relating to the aircraft A corresponds to the position that the aircraft A has if it is situated on a prescribed trajectory for the purpose of landing or by default to the current position of said aircraft A, illustrated in a customary manner by a symbol 10. The circular arc C1 is separated from said symbol 10 by a distance representative of this distance Dmin. This circular arc C1 shows the contact position of the aircraft A with the ground if it carries out an optimized approach making it possible to obtain the smallest possible distance Dmin. It also provides the pilot with distance information (aircraft-contact position).
  • Thus, by virtue of said device 1, at any instant the pilot knows his aircraft's A position of contact with the ground if he implements an optimized approach, for which the horizontal distance from the current position of the aircraft A up to the contact position of the aircraft A on the landing runway 2, is the smallest possible, as a function in particular of the aerodynamic braking capabilities of the aircraft A (taken into account in said model) and of the current flight conditions (received from said means 4).
  • According to the invention, said display means 7 present moreover, on said navigation screen 9, a symbol 11 which illustrates the position of the landing runway 2 scheduled for the landing of the aircraft A and which signals at least the position of the upstream threshold 12 of said landing runway 2. According to the invention, said circular arc C1 is situated by definition on the lateral trajectory 13 which is followed by the aircraft A and which passes through said symbol 11 on the navigation screen 9, so as to direct the aircraft A towards the landing runway 2.
  • Consequently, when on said navigation screen 9, said circular arc C1 oversteps the threshold 12 of the landing runway (symbol 11), the pilot knows that it will be impossible for him to achieve the stabilized approach conditions for the purpose of carrying out the landing on the landing runway 2, unless perhaps he changes his lateral profile.
  • Thus, by virtue of said circular arc C1 and of said symbol 11 presented on the navigation screen 9, the device 1 in accordance with the invention affords the pilot valuable aid in taking his decision to possibly interrupt an approach phase, since by virtue of this information he knows when the approach is nonstabilized and nonrecoverable. In such a situation, he need then no longer hesitate to carry out a go-around maneuver. This will without doubt make it possible to avoid numerous incidents and accidents during the approach phase.
  • By definition, a go-around is a flight phase during which the landing operations in progress are not carried through to completion.
  • In a particular embodiment:
  • said central unit 5 determines an approach distance DO which corresponds to a distance between first and third projections onto a horizontal plane, on the one hand of the current position of the aircraft A and, on the other hand of a position of contact with the ground, when the aircraft A descends and decelerates from its current position, in accordance with a standard approach (that is to say in accordance with an approach which is carried out in a regulatory and customary manner) so as to achieve said stabilized approach conditions; and
  • said display means 7 present, on said navigation screen 9, this approach distance DO in the form of a circular arc C2 which is also centered on the aforesaid position relating to the aircraft A (symbol 10) and which illustrates the position of contact with the ground for a standard approach such as this.
  • According to the invention, said stabilized approach conditions assume that the aircraft A exhibits a predetermined approach speed and approach slope that are stabilized (that is to say constant) at a predetermined height relative to the ground, for example 500 feet (about 150 meters) or 1000 feet (about 300 meters), down to a height, for example 50 feet (about 15 meters), in direct proximity to the landing runway 2.
  • By way of illustration, reference is made hereinafter to three different situations represented respectively in FIGS. 3 to 5 which show a part 14 of the navigation screen 9 comprising in particular the circular arcs C1 and C2 and the symbol 11:
  • in the example of FIG. 3, the circular arcs C1 and C2 are situated upstream of the threshold 12 of the landing runway (symbol 11) in the direction E of flight of the aircraft A so that the aircraft A can in this example carry out an approach, both in accordance with an optimized approach and in accordance with a standard approach;
  • in the example of FIG. 4, the circular arc C1 (optimized approach) is situated upstream of the threshold 12 of the landing runway 2, while the circular arc C2 (standard approach) is situated beyond (downstream) said threshold 12 of the landing runway 2. In this example, the aircraft A cannot carry out a standard approach. On the other hand, an optimized approach is still possible; and
  • in the example of FIG. 5, the two circular arcs C1 and C2 are situated beyond (downstream) the threshold 12 of the landing runway 2 so that neither a standard approach nor an optimized approach are possible. In this example, the pilot must therefore implement a go-around maneuver.
  • The display means 7 present, moreover, in a customary manner, on the navigation screen 9, in particular:
  • a plot 13 showing the theoretical flight trajectory of the aircraft A in the horizontal plane with course points 15;
  • a customary graduation 16 in angular deviations; and
  • a customary graduation 17 in distance, defined with respect to the current position of the aircraft A illustrated by the symbol 10.
  • The device 1 in accordance with the invention comprises, moreover, alert means 18 which are connected by a link 19 to said central unit 5 and which are capable of emitting an alert signal in the flight deck of the aircraft A, when said circular arc C1 is situated beyond the threshold 12 of the landing runway 2 (with respect to the current position of the aircraft A), that is to say when the position of the contact point of the aircraft A (relating to an optimized approach such as previously indicated) is situated beyond said threshold 12 of the landing runway 2 so that the landing will not be able to be carried out at all, or at the very least not under good safety conditions. Said alert signal can be an audible signal and/or a visual signal, in particular an alert message and/or a change of color or of shape pertaining to information displayed on the navigation screen 9, such as the circular arc C1 and/or the symbol 11 for example.
  • Consequently, by virtue of the device 1 in accordance with the invention, indications are made available to the pilot which allow him to manage the energy of the aircraft A and, if appropriate, to perform corrections on the energy state or if necessary a go-around. Said device 1 thus makes it possible to reduce the number of incidents during approach phases. The incidents which are covered by said device 1 are in particular runway exits, hard landings, results of nonstabilized approaches caused by surplus energy (too high, too quick). Furthermore, by virtue of the invention, it is possible to carry out in particular:
  • monitoring of the energy in the approach phase between 10 000 feet (about 3000 meters) and 500 feet (about 150 meters), 500 feet being the ultimate altitude in order to be stabilized by procedure; and
  • aid with the decision to carry out a go-around between 500 feet and 50 feet (about 15 meters), where the aircraft A must be stabilized on a predetermined approach slope (generally 3°) forming an approach axis PA, doing so at a predetermined customary approach speed.
  • Additionally, said model is used by a calculation module 20 of the central unit 5 to determine the minimum approach distance Dmin. Therefore, this calculation module 20 comprises a neural net. Preferably, this neural net makes it possible to determine said minimum approach distance Dmin, as a function of said current flight conditions and of said stabilized approach conditions, as well as of the following parameters:
  • the atmospheric pressure at ground level;
  • the mass of the aircraft A; and
  • the longitudinal instantaneous wind.
  • Moreover, in a particular embodiment, said neural net depends on the type of said aircraft A, in particular its characteristics and aerodynamic performance. This makes it possible to optimize the model and to adapt it to the aircraft A on which the device 1 is installed.
  • According to the invention, said neural net is determined on the ground during a preliminary step, prior to the flight of the aircraft A.
  • Furthermore, said calculation module 20 determines said minimum approach distance Dmin, by taking into account an optimal descent profile as a function of said current flight conditions of the aircraft A.
  • Represented in FIG. 6 are various (descent) profiles referenced P0 to P4, making it possible to carry out a landing on the runway 2 by overflying the relief 21 of the surrounding terrain 22, as well as a height scale 23 whose values H1 to H5 signalled are for example separated each time by 50 feet (about 15 meters). Said reference profiles P0 to P4 are optimal energy loss profiles which cover all the initial altitude and speed conditions of the aircraft A. Thus, in accordance with said initial altitude and speed conditions, the central unit 5 chooses the energy loss profile P0, P1, P2, P3, P4 which is optimal (which makes it possible in particular to obtain the smallest distance Dmin), and the calculation module 20 uses said profile to calculate said distance Dmin in accordance with said integrated model.
  • By referring to FIG. 6, wherein is represented the aircraft A which follows a standard descent profile P0, it is possible to consider that:
  • when the aircraft A is in a smooth configuration, one seeks to carry out a descent at a customary maximum speed VLO (known by the expression “Maximum Landing Gear Operating Speed”) in a smooth configuration, with the landing gear and the flaps extended, before decelerating on a vertical approach axis (profile P1). This vertical approach axis is an axis PA (termed “glide”) which is issued within the framework of a customary instrument approach and landing of ILS (“Instrument Landing System”) type;
  • when the aircraft A is in an enhanced-lift configuration, one seeks to carry out a descent at a customary maximum speed with flaps extended VFE (“Maximum Speed with Flaps Extended”) in a configuration termed “FULL”, with the landing gear and the flaps extended, before decelerating on the vertical approach axis PA (profile P2);
      • when the aircraft A is under the altitude of the standard procedure P0 (which is defined by the relief 21 of the approach terrain 22) and under the vertical approach axis PA, the aircraft A performs staged decelerations, with the landing gear and the flaps extended, before continuing the deceleration on said vertical approach axis PA (profile P4 which is a profile which is nonoptimal, but which favors safety relative to the relief); and
  • when the aircraft A is under the standard procedure altitude, but above the vertical approach axis PA, a descent in the enhanced-lift configuration is undertaken at the initial speed (if this initial speed is below the VFE speed of the “FULL” configuration), with the landing gear and the flaps extended, before decelerating on said vertical approach axis PA (profile P3).

Claims (16)

1-15. (canceled)
16. A method of aiding the piloting of an aircraft (A) during an approach phase for the purpose of landing, according to which method the following series of successive steps is carried out in an automatic and repetitive manner:
a) current flight conditions of the aircraft (A) are determined;
b) a minimum approach distance between the current position of the aircraft (A) and a position of contact with the ground is determined at least with the aid of said current flight conditions; and
c) at least this minimum approach distance is presented to a pilot of the aircraft (A) on a navigation screen (9),
wherein:
in step b), said minimum distance is determined with the aid of said flight conditions, as well as of a predetermined model which takes account of aerodynamic braking capabilities of the aircraft (A);
in step b), said minimum distance is determined as the minimum distance between projections onto a horizontal plane of the current position of the aircraft (A) and of a position of contact with the ground, when the aircraft (A) descends and decelerates in accordance with an optimized approach so as to achieve stabilized approach conditions, said optimized approach being such that it makes it possible to obtain the smallest possible minimum distance;
in step b), a second approach distance is determined, moreover, which corresponds to a distance between projections onto a horizontal plane of the current position of the aircraft (A) and of a position of contact with the ground, when the aircraft (A) descends and decelerates in accordance with a standard approach so as to achieve the stabilized approach conditions; and
in step c), at one and the same time the following are presented to the pilot of the aircraft (A), on said navigation screen (9):
this minimum approach distance, in the form of a first circular arc (C1) which is centered on a position (10) relating to the aircraft and which illustrates the position of contact with the ground relating to an optimized approach; and
this second approach distance, in the form of a second circular arc (C2) which is centered on said position (10) relating to the aircraft and which illustrates the position of contact with the ground relating to a standard approach.
17. The method as claimed in claim 16,
wherein in step c), a symbol (11) which illustrates the position of a landing runway (2) scheduled for the landing and which indicates at least the threshold (12) of this landing runway (2) is presented moreover, on said navigation screen (9), and said first circular arc (C1) is situated on the lateral trajectory (13) of the aircraft (A).
18. The method as claimed in claim 16,
wherein an alert signal is emitted in the flight deck of the aircraft (A), when said first circular arc (C1) is situated beyond the threshold (12) of the landing runway (2).
19. The method as claimed in claim 16,
wherein in step a), at least the following are determined as current flight conditions of the aircraft (A):
the height of the aircraft (A) with respect to the ground;
the speed of the aircraft (A); and
the aerodynamic configuration of said aircraft (A).
20. The method as claimed in claim 16, wherein said stabilized approach conditions assume that the aircraft (A) exhibits a predetermined approach speed and approach slope that are stabilized at a predetermined height relative to the ground.
21. The method as claimed in claim 16,
wherein said model intended for determining the minimum approach distance as a function of the current flight conditions, comprises a neural net.
22. The method as claimed in claim 21,
wherein said neural net determines said minimum approach distance, as a function of said current flight conditions and of said stabilized approach conditions, as well as at least of the following parameters:
the atmospheric pressure at ground level;
the mass of the aircraft (A); and
the longitudinal instantaneous wind.
23. The method as claimed in claim 21,
wherein said neural net depends on the type of said aircraft (A).
24. The method as claimed in claim 21,
wherein said neural net is determined during a preliminary step, prior to the flight of the aircraft (A).
25. The method as claimed in the claim 16,
wherein said minimum approach distance is determined by taking into account an optimal descent profile (P0 to P4) as a function of said current flight conditions.
26. A device for aiding the piloting of an aircraft during an approach phase for the purpose of landing, said device comprising:
first means (4) for determining current flight conditions of the aircraft (A);
second means (5) for determining, at least with the aid of said current flight conditions, a minimum approach distance between the current position of the aircraft (A) and a position of contact with the ground; and
display means (7) for presenting, on a navigation screen (9), at least this minimum approach distance, wherein:
said second means (5) comprise:
means for determining said minimum distance with the aid of said flight conditions and of a predetermined model which takes account of aerodynamic braking capabilities of the aircraft (A), said minimum distance corresponding to the minimum distance between projections onto a horizontal plane of the current position of the aircraft (A) and of a position of contact with the ground, when the aircraft (A) descends and decelerates in accordance with an optimized approach so as to achieve stabilized approach conditions, said optimized approach being such that it makes it possible to obtain the smallest possible minimum distance; and
means for determining a second approach distance which corresponds to a distance between projections onto a horizontal plane of the current position of the aircraft (A) and of a position of contact with the ground, when the aircraft (A) descends and decelerates in accordance with a standard approach so as to achieve the stabilized approach conditions; and
said display means (7) are formed so as to present at one and the same time the following to the pilot of the aircraft (A), on said navigation screen (9):
this minimum approach distance, in the form of a first circular arc (C1) which is centered on a position (10) relating to the aircraft and which illustrates the position of contact with the ground relating to an optimized approach; and
this second approach distance, in the form of a second circular arc (C2) which is centered on said position (10) relating to the aircraft and which illustrates the position of contact with the ground relating to a standard approach.
27. The device as claimed in claim 26,
wherein said second means (5) comprise a neural net.
28. The device as claimed in claim 26, wherein it comprises, moreover, alert means (18) capable of emitting an alert signal in the flight deck of the aircraft (A), when said first circular arc (C1) is situated beyond the threshold (12) of a landing runway (2) scheduled for the landing.
29. An aircraft, wherein it comprises a device (1) capable of implementing the method specified under claim 16.
30. An aircraft, wherein it comprises a device (1) such as that specified under claim 26.
US11/911,611 2005-05-09 2006-05-03 Method and device for assisting an aircraft flight control during landing approach Active 2028-01-19 US8346412B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR0504616 2005-05-09
FR0504616A FR2885439B1 (en) 2005-05-09 2005-05-09 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR AIDING THE CONTROL OF AN AIRCRAFT DURING AN APPROACH PHASE FOR LANDING
PCT/FR2006/000989 WO2006120318A2 (en) 2005-05-09 2006-05-03 Method and device for assisting an aircraft flight control during landing approach

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20100036551A1 true US20100036551A1 (en) 2010-02-11
US8346412B2 US8346412B2 (en) 2013-01-01

Family

ID=36010945

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/911,611 Active 2028-01-19 US8346412B2 (en) 2005-05-09 2006-05-03 Method and device for assisting an aircraft flight control during landing approach

Country Status (10)

Country Link
US (1) US8346412B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1880169B1 (en)
JP (1) JP5028411B2 (en)
CN (1) CN101171495B (en)
AT (1) ATE515681T1 (en)
BR (1) BRPI0612919A2 (en)
CA (1) CA2606821C (en)
FR (1) FR2885439B1 (en)
RU (1) RU2351898C1 (en)
WO (1) WO2006120318A2 (en)

Cited By (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090292483A1 (en) * 2008-04-24 2009-11-26 Airbus France Device and method for determining a runway state, aircraft comprising such a device and piloting assistance system using that runway state
US20100217461A1 (en) * 2009-02-25 2010-08-26 Ramon Gomez Ledesma Implementing continuous descent approaches for maximum predictability in aircraft
US20130026299A1 (en) * 2011-07-29 2013-01-31 Airbus Operations (Sas) Method And Device For An Optimal Management Of The Slats, The Flaps And The Landing Gear Of An Aircraft
EP2581893A2 (en) * 2011-10-11 2013-04-17 The Boeing Company Methods and systems for integrating runway status and layout
CN103197682A (en) * 2013-03-22 2013-07-10 北京航空航天大学 Unmanned aerial vehicle airport-entering landing gliding channel design and gliding path adjustment method
US20130184902A1 (en) * 2011-07-27 2013-07-18 Eurocopter Piloting assistance method, a piloting assistance device, and an aircraft
CN103963983A (en) * 2013-02-05 2014-08-06 霍尼韦尔国际公司 Method and apparatus for generating a virtual inner marker for an aircraft landing approach
US8972141B2 (en) 2012-03-30 2015-03-03 Airbus Operations (Sas) Method and system for controlling aircraft braking on a runway
US9114889B2 (en) 2013-05-14 2015-08-25 Thales Method and system for monitoring aircraft flight phase on approach to a runway
US20150367956A1 (en) * 2014-06-24 2015-12-24 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Aircraft landing monitor
EP3012590A1 (en) * 2014-10-21 2016-04-27 Honeywell International Inc. System and method for displaying runway landing information
EP2654029A3 (en) * 2012-02-22 2016-07-13 Honeywell International Inc. Method for generating a flight display
US9476733B2 (en) 2014-03-28 2016-10-25 Airbus Operations Sas Method and system for assisting the piloting of an aircraft
US20170158349A1 (en) * 2015-12-03 2017-06-08 Airbus Operations Sas Method and system for aiding landing of an aircraft
US20180273200A1 (en) * 2017-03-27 2018-09-27 Honeywell International Inc. Avionic display systems and methods for generating vertical situation displays including instability prediction and avoidance symbology
US10134289B2 (en) * 2016-02-18 2018-11-20 Honeywell International Inc. Methods and systems facilitating stabilized descent to a diversion airport
US10152195B2 (en) 2015-12-14 2018-12-11 Honeywell International Inc. Aircraft display system pertaining to energy management
US10793286B1 (en) * 2018-08-23 2020-10-06 Rockwell Collins, Inc. Vision based autonomous landing using flight path vector
US10839701B2 (en) 2018-06-05 2020-11-17 Honeywell International Inc. Methods and systems for stabilized approach energy management
US10854091B2 (en) * 2018-07-03 2020-12-01 Honeywell International Inc. Energy management visualization methods and systems
US11164469B2 (en) 2018-03-28 2021-11-02 Airbus Operations Sas Method and system for aiding in the piloting of an aircraft
US20220189323A1 (en) * 2020-12-10 2022-06-16 Honeywell International Inc. Dynamic radar vectoring guidance methods and systems

Families Citing this family (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9734727B2 (en) * 2015-04-16 2017-08-15 Honeywell International Inc. Aircraft systems and methods to display moving landing platforms
FR2908220B1 (en) 2006-11-08 2014-08-22 Airbus France METHOD AND DEVICE FOR AIDING THE CONTROL OF AN AIRCRAFT DURING AN APPROACH PHASE
FR2911988B1 (en) 2007-01-26 2016-03-25 Airbus France METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING A MAXIMUM STABILIZATION HEIGHT DURING THE FINAL FLIGHT PHASE OF AN AIRCRAFT
FR2937010B1 (en) * 2008-10-13 2010-12-10 Dcns METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MONITORING THE AUTOMATIC APPROVAL / TAKING OF A DRONE ON OR A CIRCULAR GRID FOR APPROVAL OF A PARTICULARLY NAVAL PLATFORM
CN101441478B (en) * 2008-12-26 2011-02-02 北京航空航天大学 Small-sized unmanned aerial vehicle automatic landing leveling control method and apparatus
US8532848B2 (en) * 2010-10-19 2013-09-10 Honeywell International Inc. Systems and methods for alerting potential tailstrike during landing
FR2968818B1 (en) * 2010-12-08 2014-07-11 Airbus Operations Sas METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR AIDING APPROACH TO AN AIRCRAFT DURING AN APPROACH FOR LANDING.
US8666567B2 (en) * 2011-03-31 2014-03-04 Honeywell International Inc. Systems and methods for controlling the speed of an aircraft
FR2978589B1 (en) * 2011-07-29 2013-08-23 Airbus Operations Sas METHOD AND DEVICE FOR OPTIMIZED MANAGEMENT OF THE VERTICAL TRAJECTORY OF AN AIRCRAFT
FR2986876B1 (en) * 2012-02-15 2014-12-05 Airbus ANOMALY DESCENT DETECTION OF AN AIRCRAFT
FR2987821B1 (en) * 2012-03-09 2014-03-28 Airbus Operations Sas METHOD AND DEVICE FOR IMPROVING LATERAL CONTROL ON THE GROUND OF AN AIRCRAFT DURING A TAKEOVER.
FR2990528B1 (en) * 2012-05-11 2015-12-25 Airbus Operations Sas METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE CONTROL OF AN AIRCRAFT
RU2518434C2 (en) * 2012-07-12 2014-06-10 Владимир Петрович Куклев Aircraft landing integrated control system
FR3016223B1 (en) * 2014-01-03 2017-03-10 Airbus Operations Sas METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING A LINEAR FIELD PROFILE ALONG A LATERAL APPROACH TRACK OF AN AIRPORT.
FR3016222B1 (en) 2014-01-03 2016-02-05 Airbus Operations Sas METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR VERTICAL GUIDANCE OF AN AIRCRAFT DURING AN APPROACH TO A LANDING TRACK ALONG A LATERAL APPROACH TRACK
US20150348423A1 (en) * 2014-05-27 2015-12-03 Honeywell International Inc. System and method for economizing flight expenditures during aircraft descent and approach
FR3024231B1 (en) * 2014-07-28 2019-12-20 Airbus Operations METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING AN OPERATIONAL DISTANCE FROM AN INDETERMINALLY TERMINATED SEGMENT OF AN AIRCRAFT FLIGHT PLAN.
US9418561B2 (en) * 2014-12-02 2016-08-16 Honeywell International Inc. System and method for displaying predictive conformal configuration cues for executing a landing
CA2984425C (en) * 2015-05-08 2023-10-10 Bombardier Inc. Systems and methods for assisting with aircraft landing
FR3043473B1 (en) 2015-11-05 2017-11-24 Airbus Operations Sas METHOD AND DEVICE FOR AIDING THE CONTROL OF AN AIRCRAFT FOR ENERGY MANAGEMENT DURING AN APPROACH PHASE.
US10643480B2 (en) * 2016-04-19 2020-05-05 George Mason University Method and apparatus for probabilistic alerting of aircraft unstabilized approaches using big data
FR3058016B1 (en) * 2016-10-21 2019-08-23 Airbus Operations METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MANAGING CONFIGURATIONS OF AN AIRCRAFT.
US11747360B2 (en) * 2017-10-11 2023-09-05 Embraer S.A. Neural network system whose training is based on a combination of model and flight information for estimation of aircraft air data
CN109866933B (en) * 2017-12-01 2022-08-26 空客直升机 Device for piloting an autogyro, associated display and corresponding method of piloting
FR3089497A1 (en) * 2018-12-10 2020-06-12 Airbus Operations Method and device for assisting the piloting of an aircraft when approaching a landing strip for a landing
JP7560458B2 (en) * 2018-12-11 2024-10-02 イーグル エアロスペース,リミテッド Method and software program for assessing aircraft landing and surface movement performance - Patents.com
US11358733B2 (en) 2020-01-21 2022-06-14 Rockwell Collins, Inc. Optimum idle descent start point display based on current conditions

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4368517A (en) * 1978-03-16 1983-01-11 Bunker Ramo Corporation Aircraft landing display system
US20030193410A1 (en) * 2001-12-26 2003-10-16 Chen Sherwin S. Vertical situation display terrain/waypoint swath, range to target speed, and blended airplane reference
US20040044446A1 (en) * 2001-08-30 2004-03-04 Honeywell International, Inc. Avionics system for determining terminal flightpath
US20040075586A1 (en) * 2002-10-15 2004-04-22 Glover John H. Approach monitoring and advisory system and method
US20040167685A1 (en) * 2003-02-24 2004-08-26 Ryan Dean E. Runway overrun monitor and method for monitoring runway overruns

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3526402B2 (en) * 1998-05-29 2004-05-17 株式会社東芝 Landing guidance system
EP1200949B1 (en) * 1999-07-30 2008-09-24 The Boeing Company Flight information display
EP1461792A4 (en) * 2001-10-11 2010-05-26 Sandel Avionics Inc Method and apparatus for reducing false taws warnings

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4368517A (en) * 1978-03-16 1983-01-11 Bunker Ramo Corporation Aircraft landing display system
US20040044446A1 (en) * 2001-08-30 2004-03-04 Honeywell International, Inc. Avionics system for determining terminal flightpath
US20030193410A1 (en) * 2001-12-26 2003-10-16 Chen Sherwin S. Vertical situation display terrain/waypoint swath, range to target speed, and blended airplane reference
US20040075586A1 (en) * 2002-10-15 2004-04-22 Glover John H. Approach monitoring and advisory system and method
US20040167685A1 (en) * 2003-02-24 2004-08-26 Ryan Dean E. Runway overrun monitor and method for monitoring runway overruns

Cited By (34)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8116989B2 (en) * 2008-04-24 2012-02-14 Airbus Operations Sas Device and method for determining a runway state, aircraft comprising such a device and piloting assistance system using that runway state
US20090292483A1 (en) * 2008-04-24 2009-11-26 Airbus France Device and method for determining a runway state, aircraft comprising such a device and piloting assistance system using that runway state
US20100217461A1 (en) * 2009-02-25 2010-08-26 Ramon Gomez Ledesma Implementing continuous descent approaches for maximum predictability in aircraft
US8442707B2 (en) * 2009-02-25 2013-05-14 The Boeing Company Implementing continuous descent approaches for maximum predictability in aircraft
US20130184902A1 (en) * 2011-07-27 2013-07-18 Eurocopter Piloting assistance method, a piloting assistance device, and an aircraft
US8843252B2 (en) * 2011-07-27 2014-09-23 Airbus Helicopters Piloting assistance method, a piloting assistance device, and an aircraft
US8864081B2 (en) * 2011-07-29 2014-10-21 Airbus Operations (Sas) Method and device for an optimal management of the slats, the flaps and the landing gear of an aircraft
US20130026299A1 (en) * 2011-07-29 2013-01-31 Airbus Operations (Sas) Method And Device For An Optimal Management Of The Slats, The Flaps And The Landing Gear Of An Aircraft
EP2581893A2 (en) * 2011-10-11 2013-04-17 The Boeing Company Methods and systems for integrating runway status and layout
EP2654029A3 (en) * 2012-02-22 2016-07-13 Honeywell International Inc. Method for generating a flight display
US9934692B2 (en) 2012-02-22 2018-04-03 Honeywell International Inc. Display system and method for generating a display
US8972141B2 (en) 2012-03-30 2015-03-03 Airbus Operations (Sas) Method and system for controlling aircraft braking on a runway
EP2763124A3 (en) * 2013-02-05 2014-08-13 Honeywell International Inc. Method and apparatus for generating a virtual inner marker for an aircraft landing approach
US9527601B2 (en) 2013-02-05 2016-12-27 Honeywell International Inc. Method and apparatus for generating a virtual inner marker for an aircraft landing approach
CN103963983A (en) * 2013-02-05 2014-08-06 霍尼韦尔国际公司 Method and apparatus for generating a virtual inner marker for an aircraft landing approach
CN103197682A (en) * 2013-03-22 2013-07-10 北京航空航天大学 Unmanned aerial vehicle airport-entering landing gliding channel design and gliding path adjustment method
US9114889B2 (en) 2013-05-14 2015-08-25 Thales Method and system for monitoring aircraft flight phase on approach to a runway
US9476733B2 (en) 2014-03-28 2016-10-25 Airbus Operations Sas Method and system for assisting the piloting of an aircraft
US9382016B2 (en) * 2014-06-24 2016-07-05 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Aircraft landing monitor
US20150367956A1 (en) * 2014-06-24 2015-12-24 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Aircraft landing monitor
US9399524B2 (en) 2014-10-21 2016-07-26 Honeywell International Inc. System and method for displaying runway landing information
EP3012590A1 (en) * 2014-10-21 2016-04-27 Honeywell International Inc. System and method for displaying runway landing information
US20170158349A1 (en) * 2015-12-03 2017-06-08 Airbus Operations Sas Method and system for aiding landing of an aircraft
US10384800B2 (en) * 2015-12-03 2019-08-20 Airbus Operations Sas Method and system for aiding landing of an aircraft
US10152195B2 (en) 2015-12-14 2018-12-11 Honeywell International Inc. Aircraft display system pertaining to energy management
US10134289B2 (en) * 2016-02-18 2018-11-20 Honeywell International Inc. Methods and systems facilitating stabilized descent to a diversion airport
US20180273200A1 (en) * 2017-03-27 2018-09-27 Honeywell International Inc. Avionic display systems and methods for generating vertical situation displays including instability prediction and avoidance symbology
US10654589B2 (en) * 2017-03-27 2020-05-19 Honeywell International Inc. Avionic display systems and methods for generating vertical situation displays including instability prediction and avoidance symbology
US11164469B2 (en) 2018-03-28 2021-11-02 Airbus Operations Sas Method and system for aiding in the piloting of an aircraft
US10839701B2 (en) 2018-06-05 2020-11-17 Honeywell International Inc. Methods and systems for stabilized approach energy management
US10854091B2 (en) * 2018-07-03 2020-12-01 Honeywell International Inc. Energy management visualization methods and systems
US10793286B1 (en) * 2018-08-23 2020-10-06 Rockwell Collins, Inc. Vision based autonomous landing using flight path vector
US20220189323A1 (en) * 2020-12-10 2022-06-16 Honeywell International Inc. Dynamic radar vectoring guidance methods and systems
US11842629B2 (en) * 2020-12-10 2023-12-12 Honeywell International Inc. Dynamic radar vectoring guidance methods and systems

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP5028411B2 (en) 2012-09-19
WO2006120318A3 (en) 2007-10-25
WO2006120318A8 (en) 2007-12-13
FR2885439B1 (en) 2010-11-19
BRPI0612919A2 (en) 2010-12-07
CA2606821A1 (en) 2006-11-16
US8346412B2 (en) 2013-01-01
EP1880169A2 (en) 2008-01-23
ATE515681T1 (en) 2011-07-15
WO2006120318A2 (en) 2006-11-16
CN101171495A (en) 2008-04-30
JP2008540228A (en) 2008-11-20
RU2351898C1 (en) 2009-04-10
CN101171495B (en) 2010-09-08
FR2885439A1 (en) 2006-11-10
EP1880169B1 (en) 2011-07-06
CA2606821C (en) 2014-07-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8346412B2 (en) Method and device for assisting an aircraft flight control during landing approach
US9058742B2 (en) Methods for illustrating aircraft situational information
CN106971632B (en) Aircraft display system in connection with energy management
EP3012590B1 (en) System and method for displaying runway landing information
JP4886794B2 (en) Method and apparatus for assisting flight of aircraft during autonomous approach
EP2654029B1 (en) Method for generating a flight display
US9008873B1 (en) Methods and systems for landing decision point
EP3208787A2 (en) Methods and systems facilitating stabilized descent to a diversion airport
US9511880B2 (en) Flight deck display systems and methods for generating vertical speed alerts during steep approaches of rotary wing aircraft
US9058743B2 (en) Automatic landing method and device for an aircraft on a strong slope runway
EP3364154B1 (en) Cockpit display systems and methods for generating cockpit displays including direct approach energy management symbology
EP3992946A1 (en) Method and system for updating a flight plan
US9476733B2 (en) Method and system for assisting the piloting of an aircraft
US11817000B2 (en) System and method to reduce runway occupancy time using pseudo threshold
US11733712B2 (en) Systems and methods for generating displays for noise abatement departure procedures
CN109841094A (en) A kind of forward sight alarm envelope curve modulator approach considering RNP and flight plan information
WO2009053964A2 (en) Method and system for displaying flight related information
EP4012686A1 (en) System and method to reduce runway occupancy time using pseudo threshold
US20230316937A1 (en) System and method of response to an unstable approach during an approach to landing for an aircraft
Mahr et al. Flight Crew Training Manual
Goerke et al. A400M tactical ground collision avoidance system T-GCAS®
Owens Operations
Bearce et al. Flight Crew Training Manual

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: AIRBUS FRANCE,FRANCE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LACAZE, ISABELLE;FOUCART, VINCENT;DE MENORVAL, JEAN-LOUIS;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:020055/0194

Effective date: 20070926

Owner name: AIRBUS FRANCE, FRANCE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LACAZE, ISABELLE;FOUCART, VINCENT;DE MENORVAL, JEAN-LOUIS;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:020055/0194

Effective date: 20070926

AS Assignment

Owner name: AIRBUS OPERATIONS SAS, FRANCE

Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:AIRBUS FRANCE;REEL/FRAME:026298/0269

Effective date: 20090630

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 8