US20100036551A1 - Method and device for assisting an aircraft flight control during landing approach - Google Patents
Method and device for assisting an aircraft flight control during landing approach Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20100036551A1 US20100036551A1 US11/911,611 US91161106A US2010036551A1 US 20100036551 A1 US20100036551 A1 US 20100036551A1 US 91161106 A US91161106 A US 91161106A US 2010036551 A1 US2010036551 A1 US 2010036551A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- aircraft
- approach
- distance
- minimum
- ground
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 123
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 18
- RZVHIXYEVGDQDX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 9,10-anthraquinone Chemical compound C1=CC=C2C(=O)C3=CC=CC=C3C(=O)C2=C1 RZVHIXYEVGDQDX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 title abstract 2
- 230000001537 neural effect Effects 0.000 claims description 14
- 230000003252 repetitive effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000010561 standard procedure Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 206010000369 Accident Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
- G05D1/00—Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots
- G05D1/04—Control of altitude or depth
- G05D1/06—Rate of change of altitude or depth
- G05D1/0607—Rate of change of altitude or depth specially adapted for aircraft
- G05D1/0653—Rate of change of altitude or depth specially adapted for aircraft during a phase of take-off or landing
- G05D1/0676—Rate of change of altitude or depth specially adapted for aircraft during a phase of take-off or landing specially adapted for landing
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01C—MEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
- G01C23/00—Combined instruments indicating more than one navigational value, e.g. for aircraft; Combined measuring devices for measuring two or more variables of movement, e.g. distance, speed or acceleration
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G08G5/00—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
- G08G5/02—Automatic approach or landing aids, i.e. systems in which flight data of incoming planes are processed to provide landing data
- G08G5/025—Navigation or guidance aids
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method and a device for aiding the piloting of an aircraft, in particular of a transport aircraft, during an approach phase for the purpose of landing on an airport landing runway.
- a go-around is a generally tricky maneuver which is often carried out too late since it is not desired.
- a go-around is in fact often still considered to be a failure for pilots. So, pilots will in general seek to avoid it to the maximum, if necessary by trying to rescue a difficult situation.
- the present invention relates to a method of aiding the piloting of an aircraft during an approach phase for the purpose of landing, and more precisely to a method of aiding the management of energy in the approach, which is aimed at aiding the pilot to take his decision as to whether or not to interrupt the approach phase with a go-around maneuver, in particular by indicating to him all the energy margins for attaining a stabilized approach.
- a) current flight conditions of the aircraft are determined; b) a minimum approach distance which corresponds to a minimum distance between projections onto a horizontal plane of the current position of the aircraft and of a position of contact with the ground is determined, with the aid of said current flight conditions and of a predetermined model, when the aircraft descends and decelerates in accordance with an optimized approach so as to achieve stabilized approach conditions; and c) at least this minimum approach distance is presented to a pilot of the aircraft, on a navigation screen of ND (“Navigation Display”) type, in the form of a first circular arc which is centered on a position relating to the aircraft and which illustrates the position of contact with the ground (and provides a distance cue). Said position relating to the aircraft corresponds to the position that the aircraft has if it is situated on a prescribed trajectory for the purpose of landing or by default to the current position of said aircraft.
- ND Navigation Display
- the pilot knows his aircraft's position of contact with the ground (and therefore his margin in relation to the runway) if he implements an optimized approach, for which the horizontal distance from the current position of the aircraft up to the contact position of the aircraft on the landing runway is the smallest possible, as a function in particular of the aerodynamic braking capabilities of the aircraft (taken into account in said model) and of the current flight conditions.
- step c) a symbol which illustrates the position of a landing runway scheduled for the landing and which indicates at least the threshold of this landing runway is presented moreover, on said navigation screen, said first circular arc being situated on the lateral trajectory of the aircraft, on which said symbol illustrating the position of the landing runway is also presumed to be situated.
- said stabilized approach conditions assume that the aircraft exhibits a predetermined approach speed and approach slope that are stabilized (that is to say constant) at a predetermined height relative to the ground, for example 500 feet (about 150 meters) or 1000 feet (about 300 meters), down to a height, for example 50 feet (about 15 meters), in direct proximity to the landing runway.
- an alert signal is emitted in the flight deck of the aircraft, when said first circular arc is situated beyond the threshold of the landing runway (with respect to the current position of the aircraft), that is to say when the position of the contact point of the aircraft (relating to an optimized approach such as previously indicated) is situated beyond said threshold of the landing runway so that the landing will not be able to be carried out at all, or at the very least not under good safety conditions.
- step a) at least the following are determined (more precisely, are estimated or are measured in a customary manner) as current flight conditions of the aircraft:
- said model intended for determining the minimum approach distance as a function of the current flight conditions comprises a neural net.
- said neural net determines said minimum approach distance, as a function of said current flight conditions and of said stabilized approach conditions, as well as at least of the following parameters:
- said neural net depends on the type of said aircraft, in particular its aerodynamic characteristics and its performance. This makes it possible to optimize the model and to adapt it to the aircraft on which the present invention is implemented.
- said neural net is determined during a preliminary step, prior to the flight of the aircraft.
- said minimum approach distance is determined by taking into account an optimal descent profile as a function of said current flight conditions.
- a second approach distance which corresponds to a distance between projections onto a horizontal plane of the current position of the aircraft and of a position of contact with the ground is determined, when the aircraft descends and decelerates in accordance with a standard approach (in relation to aeronautical directives) so as to achieve the stabilized approach conditions;
- this second approach distance is presented to the pilot of the aircraft on said navigation screen in the form of a second circular arc which is centered on said position relating to the aircraft and which illustrates the position of contact with the ground (relating to a standard approach).
- the present invention also relates to a device for aiding the piloting of an aircraft, in particular of a transport aircraft, during an approach phase for the purpose of landing on an airport landing runway.
- said device is noteworthy in that it comprises:
- display means for presenting, on a navigation screen, at least this minimum approach distance in the form of a first circular arc which is centered on the (aforesaid) position relating to the aircraft and which illustrates the position of contact with the ground.
- said second means comprise a neural net.
- said device in accordance with the invention comprises, moreover, alert means capable of emitting an alert signal (audible and/or visual) in the flight deck of the aircraft, when said first circular arc is situated beyond the threshold of a landing runway scheduled for the landing.
- alert means capable of emitting an alert signal (audible and/or visual) in the flight deck of the aircraft, when said first circular arc is situated beyond the threshold of a landing runway scheduled for the landing.
- FIG. 1 is the schematic diagram of a device for aiding piloting in accordance with the invention.
- FIG. 2 shows a navigation screen comprising the information presented in accordance with the present invention.
- FIGS. 3 to 5 represent a part of the navigation screen of FIG. 2 , respectively for different approach phases.
- FIG. 6 is a graphic illustrating various approach trajectories capable of being followed by an aircraft, in accordance with the present invention, for the purpose of a landing on a landing runway.
- the device 1 in accordance with the invention and schematically represented in FIG. 1 is intended to aid a pilot to pilot an aircraft A, in particular a wide-bodied transport aircraft, during the approach to a landing runway 2 for the purpose of a landing on this runway 2 .
- said device 1 comprises:
- a set 3 of information sources which comprise at least means 4 for determining, in particular for measuring or estimating, in a customary manner, current flight conditions of the aircraft A. More precisely, said means 4 determine at least the following current flight conditions:
- a central unit 5 which is connected by a link 6 to said set 3 of information sources, and which determines, with the aid of the current flight conditions received from said means 4 and of a predetermined model specified below, a minimum approach distance Dmin which corresponds to a minimum distance (profile achievable by the pilot) between first and second projections onto a horizontal plane, on the one hand of the current position of the aircraft A and, on the other hand of a position of contact with the ground of said aircraft A, when the latter descends and decelerates from its current position, in accordance with an optimized approach specified below, so as to achieve stabilized approach conditions, also specified hereinafter; and
- ND Navigation Display
- Dmin distance between the aircraft A and the central unit 5 and which are intended to present, on a customary navigation screen 9 of ND (“Navigation Display”) type, at least this minimum approach distance Dmin, in the form of a circular arc C 1 which is centered on a position relating to the aircraft A.
- Said position relating to the aircraft A corresponds to the position that the aircraft A has if it is situated on a prescribed trajectory for the purpose of landing or by default to the current position of said aircraft A, illustrated in a customary manner by a symbol 10 .
- the circular arc C 1 is separated from said symbol 10 by a distance representative of this distance Dmin.
- This circular arc C 1 shows the contact position of the aircraft A with the ground if it carries out an optimized approach making it possible to obtain the smallest possible distance Dmin. It also provides the pilot with distance information (aircraft-contact position).
- said device 1 at any instant the pilot knows his aircraft's A position of contact with the ground if he implements an optimized approach, for which the horizontal distance from the current position of the aircraft A up to the contact position of the aircraft A on the landing runway 2 , is the smallest possible, as a function in particular of the aerodynamic braking capabilities of the aircraft A (taken into account in said model) and of the current flight conditions (received from said means 4 ).
- said display means 7 present moreover, on said navigation screen 9 , a symbol 11 which illustrates the position of the landing runway 2 scheduled for the landing of the aircraft A and which signals at least the position of the upstream threshold 12 of said landing runway 2 .
- said circular arc C 1 is situated by definition on the lateral trajectory 13 which is followed by the aircraft A and which passes through said symbol 11 on the navigation screen 9 , so as to direct the aircraft A towards the landing runway 2 .
- the device 1 in accordance with the invention affords the pilot valuable aid in taking his decision to possibly interrupt an approach phase, since by virtue of this information he knows when the approach is nonstabilized and nonrecoverable. In such a situation, he need then no longer hesitate to carry out a go-around maneuver. This will without doubt make it possible to avoid numerous incidents and accidents during the approach phase.
- a go-around is a flight phase during which the landing operations in progress are not carried through to completion.
- said central unit 5 determines an approach distance DO which corresponds to a distance between first and third projections onto a horizontal plane, on the one hand of the current position of the aircraft A and, on the other hand of a position of contact with the ground, when the aircraft A descends and decelerates from its current position, in accordance with a standard approach (that is to say in accordance with an approach which is carried out in a regulatory and customary manner) so as to achieve said stabilized approach conditions; and
- said display means 7 present, on said navigation screen 9 , this approach distance DO in the form of a circular arc C 2 which is also centered on the aforesaid position relating to the aircraft A (symbol 10 ) and which illustrates the position of contact with the ground for a standard approach such as this.
- said stabilized approach conditions assume that the aircraft A exhibits a predetermined approach speed and approach slope that are stabilized (that is to say constant) at a predetermined height relative to the ground, for example 500 feet (about 150 meters) or 1000 feet (about 300 meters), down to a height, for example 50 feet (about 15 meters), in direct proximity to the landing runway 2 .
- FIGS. 3 to 5 show a part 14 of the navigation screen 9 comprising in particular the circular arcs C 1 and C 2 and the symbol 11 :
- the circular arcs C 1 and C 2 are situated upstream of the threshold 12 of the landing runway (symbol 11 ) in the direction E of flight of the aircraft A so that the aircraft A can in this example carry out an approach, both in accordance with an optimized approach and in accordance with a standard approach;
- the circular arc C 1 (optimized approach) is situated upstream of the threshold 12 of the landing runway 2
- the circular arc C 2 (standard approach) is situated beyond (downstream) said threshold 12 of the landing runway 2 .
- the aircraft A cannot carry out a standard approach.
- an optimized approach is still possible;
- the two circular arcs C 1 and C 2 are situated beyond (downstream) the threshold 12 of the landing runway 2 so that neither a standard approach nor an optimized approach are possible. In this example, the pilot must therefore implement a go-around maneuver.
- the display means 7 present, moreover, in a customary manner, on the navigation screen 9 , in particular:
- a customary graduation 17 in distance defined with respect to the current position of the aircraft A illustrated by the symbol 10 .
- the device 1 in accordance with the invention comprises, moreover, alert means 18 which are connected by a link 19 to said central unit 5 and which are capable of emitting an alert signal in the flight deck of the aircraft A, when said circular arc C 1 is situated beyond the threshold 12 of the landing runway 2 (with respect to the current position of the aircraft A), that is to say when the position of the contact point of the aircraft A (relating to an optimized approach such as previously indicated) is situated beyond said threshold 12 of the landing runway 2 so that the landing will not be able to be carried out at all, or at the very least not under good safety conditions.
- alert means 18 which are connected by a link 19 to said central unit 5 and which are capable of emitting an alert signal in the flight deck of the aircraft A, when said circular arc C 1 is situated beyond the threshold 12 of the landing runway 2 (with respect to the current position of the aircraft A), that is to say when the position of the contact point of the aircraft A (relating to an optimized approach such as previously indicated) is situated beyond said threshold 12 of the landing runway 2 so that the landing will not be
- Said alert signal can be an audible signal and/or a visual signal, in particular an alert message and/or a change of color or of shape pertaining to information displayed on the navigation screen 9 , such as the circular arc C 1 and/or the symbol 11 for example.
- the device 1 in accordance with the invention, indications are made available to the pilot which allow him to manage the energy of the aircraft A and, if appropriate, to perform corrections on the energy state or if necessary a go-around. Said device 1 thus makes it possible to reduce the number of incidents during approach phases.
- the incidents which are covered by said device 1 are in particular runway exits, hard landings, results of nonstabilized approaches caused by surplus energy (too high, too quick).
- this calculation module 20 comprises a neural net.
- this neural net makes it possible to determine said minimum approach distance Dmin, as a function of said current flight conditions and of said stabilized approach conditions, as well as of the following parameters:
- said neural net depends on the type of said aircraft A, in particular its characteristics and aerodynamic performance. This makes it possible to optimize the model and to adapt it to the aircraft A on which the device 1 is installed.
- said neural net is determined on the ground during a preliminary step, prior to the flight of the aircraft A.
- said calculation module 20 determines said minimum approach distance Dmin, by taking into account an optimal descent profile as a function of said current flight conditions of the aircraft A.
- FIG. 6 Represented in FIG. 6 are various (descent) profiles referenced P 0 to P 4 , making it possible to carry out a landing on the runway 2 by overflying the relief 21 of the surrounding terrain 22 , as well as a height scale 23 whose values H 1 to H 5 signalled are for example separated each time by 50 feet (about 15 meters).
- Said reference profiles P 0 to P 4 are optimal energy loss profiles which cover all the initial altitude and speed conditions of the aircraft A.
- the central unit 5 chooses the energy loss profile P 0 , P 1 , P 2 , P 3 , P 4 which is optimal (which makes it possible in particular to obtain the smallest distance Dmin), and the calculation module 20 uses said profile to calculate said distance Dmin in accordance with said integrated model.
- VLO Maximum Landing Gear Operating Speed
- This vertical approach axis is an axis PA (termed “glide”) which is issued within the framework of a customary instrument approach and landing of ILS (“Instrument Landing System”) type;
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
- Navigation (AREA)
- Variable-Direction Aerials And Aerial Arrays (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to a method and a device for aiding the piloting of an aircraft, in particular of a transport aircraft, during an approach phase for the purpose of landing on an airport landing runway.
- It is known that a significant proportion of aircraft accidents occur during an approach phase for the purpose of landing. The main causes of accidents relate in general to:
-
- unanticipated meteorological conditions;
- inappropriate reactions of pilots;
- a nonoptimal aerodynamic configuration of the aircraft; and
- a nonstabilized approach of the aircraft (which is too high and/or arrives too quickly).
- In most cases, had the crews of the aircraft been aware that the real situation of their aircraft did not allow a landing to be carried out under good safety conditions, they would have been able to avoid these incidents by performing a go-around.
- It is also known that a go-around is a generally tricky maneuver which is often carried out too late since it is not desired. A go-around is in fact often still considered to be a failure for pilots. So, pilots will in general seek to avoid it to the maximum, if necessary by trying to rescue a difficult situation.
- However, if such a go-around maneuver were carried out wittingly whenever necessary, it would make it possible to avoid numerous incidents and accidents that occur in the approach phase (approach to a runway and landing on this runway).
- The present invention relates to a method of aiding the piloting of an aircraft during an approach phase for the purpose of landing, and more precisely to a method of aiding the management of energy in the approach, which is aimed at aiding the pilot to take his decision as to whether or not to interrupt the approach phase with a go-around maneuver, in particular by indicating to him all the energy margins for attaining a stabilized approach.
- For this purpose, according to the invention, said method is noteworthy in that the following series of successive steps is carried out in an automatic and repetitive manner:
- a) current flight conditions of the aircraft are determined;
b) a minimum approach distance which corresponds to a minimum distance between projections onto a horizontal plane of the current position of the aircraft and of a position of contact with the ground is determined, with the aid of said current flight conditions and of a predetermined model, when the aircraft descends and decelerates in accordance with an optimized approach so as to achieve stabilized approach conditions; and
c) at least this minimum approach distance is presented to a pilot of the aircraft, on a navigation screen of ND (“Navigation Display”) type, in the form of a first circular arc which is centered on a position relating to the aircraft and which illustrates the position of contact with the ground (and provides a distance cue). Said position relating to the aircraft corresponds to the position that the aircraft has if it is situated on a prescribed trajectory for the purpose of landing or by default to the current position of said aircraft. - Thus, by virtue of the invention, at any instant the pilot knows his aircraft's position of contact with the ground (and therefore his margin in relation to the runway) if he implements an optimized approach, for which the horizontal distance from the current position of the aircraft up to the contact position of the aircraft on the landing runway is the smallest possible, as a function in particular of the aerodynamic braking capabilities of the aircraft (taken into account in said model) and of the current flight conditions.
- In an advantageous manner, in step c), a symbol which illustrates the position of a landing runway scheduled for the landing and which indicates at least the threshold of this landing runway is presented moreover, on said navigation screen, said first circular arc being situated on the lateral trajectory of the aircraft, on which said symbol illustrating the position of the landing runway is also presumed to be situated.
- Thus, when on said navigation screen said first circular arc oversteps said threshold of the landing runway illustrated by this symbol, the pilot knows that it will be impossible for him to achieve stabilized approach conditions for the purpose of carrying out the landing on said landing runway, unless perhaps he changes his lateral profile.
- According to the invention, said stabilized approach conditions assume that the aircraft exhibits a predetermined approach speed and approach slope that are stabilized (that is to say constant) at a predetermined height relative to the ground, for example 500 feet (about 150 meters) or 1000 feet (about 300 meters), down to a height, for example 50 feet (about 15 meters), in direct proximity to the landing runway.
- Consequently, by virtue of said first circular arc and of said symbol presented on the navigation screen, the pilot is afforded valuable aid in taking his decision to possibly interrupt an approach phase, since by virtue of this information he knows when the approach is nonstabilized and nonrecoverable. In such a situation, he need then no longer hesitate to carry out a go-around maneuver (or an energy loss maneuver). This will without doubt make it possible to avoid numerous incidents and accidents during the approach phase and to better manage the approach so as to reduce the number of go-arounds.
- To properly apprise the pilot of any critical situation of the aforesaid type, advantageously, an alert signal is emitted in the flight deck of the aircraft, when said first circular arc is situated beyond the threshold of the landing runway (with respect to the current position of the aircraft), that is to say when the position of the contact point of the aircraft (relating to an optimized approach such as previously indicated) is situated beyond said threshold of the landing runway so that the landing will not be able to be carried out at all, or at the very least not under good safety conditions.
- In a particular embodiment, in step a) at least the following are determined (more precisely, are estimated or are measured in a customary manner) as current flight conditions of the aircraft:
- the height of the aircraft with respect to the ground;
- the speed of the aircraft; and
- the aerodynamic configuration of said aircraft.
- Furthermore, advantageously, said model intended for determining the minimum approach distance as a function of the current flight conditions comprises a neural net. In this case, preferably, said neural net determines said minimum approach distance, as a function of said current flight conditions and of said stabilized approach conditions, as well as at least of the following parameters:
- the atmospheric pressure at ground level;
- the mass of the aircraft; and
- the longitudinal instantaneous wind.
- Moreover, in a particular embodiment, said neural net depends on the type of said aircraft, in particular its aerodynamic characteristics and its performance. This makes it possible to optimize the model and to adapt it to the aircraft on which the present invention is implemented.
- Advantageously, said neural net is determined during a preliminary step, prior to the flight of the aircraft.
- Furthermore, in an advantageous manner, said minimum approach distance is determined by taking into account an optimal descent profile as a function of said current flight conditions.
- In a particular embodiment, moreover:
- in step b), a second approach distance which corresponds to a distance between projections onto a horizontal plane of the current position of the aircraft and of a position of contact with the ground is determined, when the aircraft descends and decelerates in accordance with a standard approach (in relation to aeronautical directives) so as to achieve the stabilized approach conditions; and
- in step c), this second approach distance is presented to the pilot of the aircraft on said navigation screen in the form of a second circular arc which is centered on said position relating to the aircraft and which illustrates the position of contact with the ground (relating to a standard approach).
- The present invention also relates to a device for aiding the piloting of an aircraft, in particular of a transport aircraft, during an approach phase for the purpose of landing on an airport landing runway.
- According to the invention, said device is noteworthy in that it comprises:
- first means for determining current flight conditions of the aircraft;
- second means for determining, with the aid of said current flight conditions and of a predetermined model, a minimum approach distance which corresponds to a minimum distance between projections onto a horizontal plane of the current position of the aircraft and of a position of contact with the ground, when the aircraft descends and decelerates in accordance with an optimized approach so as to achieve stabilized approach conditions; and
- display means for presenting, on a navigation screen, at least this minimum approach distance in the form of a first circular arc which is centered on the (aforesaid) position relating to the aircraft and which illustrates the position of contact with the ground.
- Preferably, said second means comprise a neural net.
- Furthermore, in a particular embodiment, said device in accordance with the invention comprises, moreover, alert means capable of emitting an alert signal (audible and/or visual) in the flight deck of the aircraft, when said first circular arc is situated beyond the threshold of a landing runway scheduled for the landing.
- The figures of the appended drawing will elucidate the manner in which the invention can be carried out. In these figures, identical references designate similar elements.
-
FIG. 1 is the schematic diagram of a device for aiding piloting in accordance with the invention. -
FIG. 2 shows a navigation screen comprising the information presented in accordance with the present invention. -
FIGS. 3 to 5 represent a part of the navigation screen ofFIG. 2 , respectively for different approach phases. -
FIG. 6 is a graphic illustrating various approach trajectories capable of being followed by an aircraft, in accordance with the present invention, for the purpose of a landing on a landing runway. - The
device 1 in accordance with the invention and schematically represented inFIG. 1 is intended to aid a pilot to pilot an aircraft A, in particular a wide-bodied transport aircraft, during the approach to a landing runway 2 for the purpose of a landing on this runway 2. - According to the invention, said
device 1 comprises: - a
set 3 of information sources which comprise at least means 4 for determining, in particular for measuring or estimating, in a customary manner, current flight conditions of the aircraft A. More precisely, said means 4 determine at least the following current flight conditions: - the height of the aircraft A with respect to the ground;
- the speed of the aircraft A; and
- the aerodynamic configuration (positions of the slats and flaps in particular) of said aircraft A;
- a central unit 5 which is connected by a link 6 to said set 3 of information sources, and which determines, with the aid of the current flight conditions received from said
means 4 and of a predetermined model specified below, a minimum approach distance Dmin which corresponds to a minimum distance (profile achievable by the pilot) between first and second projections onto a horizontal plane, on the one hand of the current position of the aircraft A and, on the other hand of a position of contact with the ground of said aircraft A, when the latter descends and decelerates from its current position, in accordance with an optimized approach specified below, so as to achieve stabilized approach conditions, also specified hereinafter; and - display means 7 which are connected by a link 8 to said central unit 5 and which are intended to present, on a
customary navigation screen 9 of ND (“Navigation Display”) type, at least this minimum approach distance Dmin, in the form of a circular arc C1 which is centered on a position relating to the aircraft A. Said position relating to the aircraft A corresponds to the position that the aircraft A has if it is situated on a prescribed trajectory for the purpose of landing or by default to the current position of said aircraft A, illustrated in a customary manner by asymbol 10. The circular arc C1 is separated from saidsymbol 10 by a distance representative of this distance Dmin. This circular arc C1 shows the contact position of the aircraft A with the ground if it carries out an optimized approach making it possible to obtain the smallest possible distance Dmin. It also provides the pilot with distance information (aircraft-contact position). - Thus, by virtue of said
device 1, at any instant the pilot knows his aircraft's A position of contact with the ground if he implements an optimized approach, for which the horizontal distance from the current position of the aircraft A up to the contact position of the aircraft A on the landing runway 2, is the smallest possible, as a function in particular of the aerodynamic braking capabilities of the aircraft A (taken into account in said model) and of the current flight conditions (received from said means 4). - According to the invention, said display means 7 present moreover, on said
navigation screen 9, asymbol 11 which illustrates the position of the landing runway 2 scheduled for the landing of the aircraft A and which signals at least the position of theupstream threshold 12 of said landing runway 2. According to the invention, said circular arc C1 is situated by definition on thelateral trajectory 13 which is followed by the aircraft A and which passes through saidsymbol 11 on thenavigation screen 9, so as to direct the aircraft A towards the landing runway 2. - Consequently, when on said
navigation screen 9, said circular arc C1 oversteps thethreshold 12 of the landing runway (symbol 11), the pilot knows that it will be impossible for him to achieve the stabilized approach conditions for the purpose of carrying out the landing on the landing runway 2, unless perhaps he changes his lateral profile. - Thus, by virtue of said circular arc C1 and of said
symbol 11 presented on thenavigation screen 9, thedevice 1 in accordance with the invention affords the pilot valuable aid in taking his decision to possibly interrupt an approach phase, since by virtue of this information he knows when the approach is nonstabilized and nonrecoverable. In such a situation, he need then no longer hesitate to carry out a go-around maneuver. This will without doubt make it possible to avoid numerous incidents and accidents during the approach phase. - By definition, a go-around is a flight phase during which the landing operations in progress are not carried through to completion.
- In a particular embodiment:
- said central unit 5 determines an approach distance DO which corresponds to a distance between first and third projections onto a horizontal plane, on the one hand of the current position of the aircraft A and, on the other hand of a position of contact with the ground, when the aircraft A descends and decelerates from its current position, in accordance with a standard approach (that is to say in accordance with an approach which is carried out in a regulatory and customary manner) so as to achieve said stabilized approach conditions; and
- said display means 7 present, on said
navigation screen 9, this approach distance DO in the form of a circular arc C2 which is also centered on the aforesaid position relating to the aircraft A (symbol 10) and which illustrates the position of contact with the ground for a standard approach such as this. - According to the invention, said stabilized approach conditions assume that the aircraft A exhibits a predetermined approach speed and approach slope that are stabilized (that is to say constant) at a predetermined height relative to the ground, for example 500 feet (about 150 meters) or 1000 feet (about 300 meters), down to a height, for example 50 feet (about 15 meters), in direct proximity to the landing runway 2.
- By way of illustration, reference is made hereinafter to three different situations represented respectively in
FIGS. 3 to 5 which show apart 14 of thenavigation screen 9 comprising in particular the circular arcs C1 and C2 and the symbol 11: - in the example of
FIG. 3 , the circular arcs C1 and C2 are situated upstream of thethreshold 12 of the landing runway (symbol 11) in the direction E of flight of the aircraft A so that the aircraft A can in this example carry out an approach, both in accordance with an optimized approach and in accordance with a standard approach; - in the example of
FIG. 4 , the circular arc C1 (optimized approach) is situated upstream of thethreshold 12 of the landing runway 2, while the circular arc C2 (standard approach) is situated beyond (downstream) saidthreshold 12 of the landing runway 2. In this example, the aircraft A cannot carry out a standard approach. On the other hand, an optimized approach is still possible; and - in the example of
FIG. 5 , the two circular arcs C1 and C2 are situated beyond (downstream) thethreshold 12 of the landing runway 2 so that neither a standard approach nor an optimized approach are possible. In this example, the pilot must therefore implement a go-around maneuver. - The display means 7 present, moreover, in a customary manner, on the
navigation screen 9, in particular: - a
plot 13 showing the theoretical flight trajectory of the aircraft A in the horizontal plane with course points 15; - a
customary graduation 16 in angular deviations; and - a
customary graduation 17 in distance, defined with respect to the current position of the aircraft A illustrated by thesymbol 10. - The
device 1 in accordance with the invention comprises, moreover, alert means 18 which are connected by alink 19 to said central unit 5 and which are capable of emitting an alert signal in the flight deck of the aircraft A, when said circular arc C1 is situated beyond thethreshold 12 of the landing runway 2 (with respect to the current position of the aircraft A), that is to say when the position of the contact point of the aircraft A (relating to an optimized approach such as previously indicated) is situated beyond saidthreshold 12 of the landing runway 2 so that the landing will not be able to be carried out at all, or at the very least not under good safety conditions. Said alert signal can be an audible signal and/or a visual signal, in particular an alert message and/or a change of color or of shape pertaining to information displayed on thenavigation screen 9, such as the circular arc C1 and/or thesymbol 11 for example. - Consequently, by virtue of the
device 1 in accordance with the invention, indications are made available to the pilot which allow him to manage the energy of the aircraft A and, if appropriate, to perform corrections on the energy state or if necessary a go-around.Said device 1 thus makes it possible to reduce the number of incidents during approach phases. The incidents which are covered by saiddevice 1 are in particular runway exits, hard landings, results of nonstabilized approaches caused by surplus energy (too high, too quick). Furthermore, by virtue of the invention, it is possible to carry out in particular: - monitoring of the energy in the approach phase between 10 000 feet (about 3000 meters) and 500 feet (about 150 meters), 500 feet being the ultimate altitude in order to be stabilized by procedure; and
- aid with the decision to carry out a go-around between 500 feet and 50 feet (about 15 meters), where the aircraft A must be stabilized on a predetermined approach slope (generally 3°) forming an approach axis PA, doing so at a predetermined customary approach speed.
- Additionally, said model is used by a
calculation module 20 of the central unit 5 to determine the minimum approach distance Dmin. Therefore, thiscalculation module 20 comprises a neural net. Preferably, this neural net makes it possible to determine said minimum approach distance Dmin, as a function of said current flight conditions and of said stabilized approach conditions, as well as of the following parameters: - the atmospheric pressure at ground level;
- the mass of the aircraft A; and
- the longitudinal instantaneous wind.
- Moreover, in a particular embodiment, said neural net depends on the type of said aircraft A, in particular its characteristics and aerodynamic performance. This makes it possible to optimize the model and to adapt it to the aircraft A on which the
device 1 is installed. - According to the invention, said neural net is determined on the ground during a preliminary step, prior to the flight of the aircraft A.
- Furthermore, said
calculation module 20 determines said minimum approach distance Dmin, by taking into account an optimal descent profile as a function of said current flight conditions of the aircraft A. - Represented in
FIG. 6 are various (descent) profiles referenced P0 to P4, making it possible to carry out a landing on the runway 2 by overflying therelief 21 of the surroundingterrain 22, as well as aheight scale 23 whose values H1 to H5 signalled are for example separated each time by 50 feet (about 15 meters). Said reference profiles P0 to P4 are optimal energy loss profiles which cover all the initial altitude and speed conditions of the aircraft A. Thus, in accordance with said initial altitude and speed conditions, the central unit 5 chooses the energy loss profile P0, P1, P2, P3, P4 which is optimal (which makes it possible in particular to obtain the smallest distance Dmin), and thecalculation module 20 uses said profile to calculate said distance Dmin in accordance with said integrated model. - By referring to
FIG. 6 , wherein is represented the aircraft A which follows a standard descent profile P0, it is possible to consider that: - when the aircraft A is in a smooth configuration, one seeks to carry out a descent at a customary maximum speed VLO (known by the expression “Maximum Landing Gear Operating Speed”) in a smooth configuration, with the landing gear and the flaps extended, before decelerating on a vertical approach axis (profile P1). This vertical approach axis is an axis PA (termed “glide”) which is issued within the framework of a customary instrument approach and landing of ILS (“Instrument Landing System”) type;
- when the aircraft A is in an enhanced-lift configuration, one seeks to carry out a descent at a customary maximum speed with flaps extended VFE (“Maximum Speed with Flaps Extended”) in a configuration termed “FULL”, with the landing gear and the flaps extended, before decelerating on the vertical approach axis PA (profile P2);
-
- when the aircraft A is under the altitude of the standard procedure P0 (which is defined by the
relief 21 of the approach terrain 22) and under the vertical approach axis PA, the aircraft A performs staged decelerations, with the landing gear and the flaps extended, before continuing the deceleration on said vertical approach axis PA (profile P4 which is a profile which is nonoptimal, but which favors safety relative to the relief); and
- when the aircraft A is under the altitude of the standard procedure P0 (which is defined by the
- when the aircraft A is under the standard procedure altitude, but above the vertical approach axis PA, a descent in the enhanced-lift configuration is undertaken at the initial speed (if this initial speed is below the VFE speed of the “FULL” configuration), with the landing gear and the flaps extended, before decelerating on said vertical approach axis PA (profile P3).
Claims (16)
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FR0504616 | 2005-05-09 | ||
FR0504616A FR2885439B1 (en) | 2005-05-09 | 2005-05-09 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR AIDING THE CONTROL OF AN AIRCRAFT DURING AN APPROACH PHASE FOR LANDING |
PCT/FR2006/000989 WO2006120318A2 (en) | 2005-05-09 | 2006-05-03 | Method and device for assisting an aircraft flight control during landing approach |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20100036551A1 true US20100036551A1 (en) | 2010-02-11 |
US8346412B2 US8346412B2 (en) | 2013-01-01 |
Family
ID=36010945
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/911,611 Active 2028-01-19 US8346412B2 (en) | 2005-05-09 | 2006-05-03 | Method and device for assisting an aircraft flight control during landing approach |
Country Status (10)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8346412B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1880169B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP5028411B2 (en) |
CN (1) | CN101171495B (en) |
AT (1) | ATE515681T1 (en) |
BR (1) | BRPI0612919A2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2606821C (en) |
FR (1) | FR2885439B1 (en) |
RU (1) | RU2351898C1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2006120318A2 (en) |
Cited By (22)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090292483A1 (en) * | 2008-04-24 | 2009-11-26 | Airbus France | Device and method for determining a runway state, aircraft comprising such a device and piloting assistance system using that runway state |
US20100217461A1 (en) * | 2009-02-25 | 2010-08-26 | Ramon Gomez Ledesma | Implementing continuous descent approaches for maximum predictability in aircraft |
US20130026299A1 (en) * | 2011-07-29 | 2013-01-31 | Airbus Operations (Sas) | Method And Device For An Optimal Management Of The Slats, The Flaps And The Landing Gear Of An Aircraft |
EP2581893A2 (en) * | 2011-10-11 | 2013-04-17 | The Boeing Company | Methods and systems for integrating runway status and layout |
CN103197682A (en) * | 2013-03-22 | 2013-07-10 | 北京航空航天大学 | Unmanned aerial vehicle airport-entering landing gliding channel design and gliding path adjustment method |
US20130184902A1 (en) * | 2011-07-27 | 2013-07-18 | Eurocopter | Piloting assistance method, a piloting assistance device, and an aircraft |
CN103963983A (en) * | 2013-02-05 | 2014-08-06 | 霍尼韦尔国际公司 | Method and apparatus for generating a virtual inner marker for an aircraft landing approach |
US8972141B2 (en) | 2012-03-30 | 2015-03-03 | Airbus Operations (Sas) | Method and system for controlling aircraft braking on a runway |
US9114889B2 (en) | 2013-05-14 | 2015-08-25 | Thales | Method and system for monitoring aircraft flight phase on approach to a runway |
US20150367956A1 (en) * | 2014-06-24 | 2015-12-24 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Aircraft landing monitor |
EP3012590A1 (en) * | 2014-10-21 | 2016-04-27 | Honeywell International Inc. | System and method for displaying runway landing information |
EP2654029A3 (en) * | 2012-02-22 | 2016-07-13 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method for generating a flight display |
US9476733B2 (en) | 2014-03-28 | 2016-10-25 | Airbus Operations Sas | Method and system for assisting the piloting of an aircraft |
US20170158349A1 (en) * | 2015-12-03 | 2017-06-08 | Airbus Operations Sas | Method and system for aiding landing of an aircraft |
US20180273200A1 (en) * | 2017-03-27 | 2018-09-27 | Honeywell International Inc. | Avionic display systems and methods for generating vertical situation displays including instability prediction and avoidance symbology |
US10134289B2 (en) * | 2016-02-18 | 2018-11-20 | Honeywell International Inc. | Methods and systems facilitating stabilized descent to a diversion airport |
US10152195B2 (en) | 2015-12-14 | 2018-12-11 | Honeywell International Inc. | Aircraft display system pertaining to energy management |
US10793286B1 (en) * | 2018-08-23 | 2020-10-06 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Vision based autonomous landing using flight path vector |
US10839701B2 (en) | 2018-06-05 | 2020-11-17 | Honeywell International Inc. | Methods and systems for stabilized approach energy management |
US10854091B2 (en) * | 2018-07-03 | 2020-12-01 | Honeywell International Inc. | Energy management visualization methods and systems |
US11164469B2 (en) | 2018-03-28 | 2021-11-02 | Airbus Operations Sas | Method and system for aiding in the piloting of an aircraft |
US20220189323A1 (en) * | 2020-12-10 | 2022-06-16 | Honeywell International Inc. | Dynamic radar vectoring guidance methods and systems |
Families Citing this family (27)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9734727B2 (en) * | 2015-04-16 | 2017-08-15 | Honeywell International Inc. | Aircraft systems and methods to display moving landing platforms |
FR2908220B1 (en) | 2006-11-08 | 2014-08-22 | Airbus France | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR AIDING THE CONTROL OF AN AIRCRAFT DURING AN APPROACH PHASE |
FR2911988B1 (en) | 2007-01-26 | 2016-03-25 | Airbus France | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING A MAXIMUM STABILIZATION HEIGHT DURING THE FINAL FLIGHT PHASE OF AN AIRCRAFT |
FR2937010B1 (en) * | 2008-10-13 | 2010-12-10 | Dcns | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MONITORING THE AUTOMATIC APPROVAL / TAKING OF A DRONE ON OR A CIRCULAR GRID FOR APPROVAL OF A PARTICULARLY NAVAL PLATFORM |
CN101441478B (en) * | 2008-12-26 | 2011-02-02 | 北京航空航天大学 | Small-sized unmanned aerial vehicle automatic landing leveling control method and apparatus |
US8532848B2 (en) * | 2010-10-19 | 2013-09-10 | Honeywell International Inc. | Systems and methods for alerting potential tailstrike during landing |
FR2968818B1 (en) * | 2010-12-08 | 2014-07-11 | Airbus Operations Sas | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR AIDING APPROACH TO AN AIRCRAFT DURING AN APPROACH FOR LANDING. |
US8666567B2 (en) * | 2011-03-31 | 2014-03-04 | Honeywell International Inc. | Systems and methods for controlling the speed of an aircraft |
FR2978589B1 (en) * | 2011-07-29 | 2013-08-23 | Airbus Operations Sas | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR OPTIMIZED MANAGEMENT OF THE VERTICAL TRAJECTORY OF AN AIRCRAFT |
FR2986876B1 (en) * | 2012-02-15 | 2014-12-05 | Airbus | ANOMALY DESCENT DETECTION OF AN AIRCRAFT |
FR2987821B1 (en) * | 2012-03-09 | 2014-03-28 | Airbus Operations Sas | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR IMPROVING LATERAL CONTROL ON THE GROUND OF AN AIRCRAFT DURING A TAKEOVER. |
FR2990528B1 (en) * | 2012-05-11 | 2015-12-25 | Airbus Operations Sas | METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE CONTROL OF AN AIRCRAFT |
RU2518434C2 (en) * | 2012-07-12 | 2014-06-10 | Владимир Петрович Куклев | Aircraft landing integrated control system |
FR3016223B1 (en) * | 2014-01-03 | 2017-03-10 | Airbus Operations Sas | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING A LINEAR FIELD PROFILE ALONG A LATERAL APPROACH TRACK OF AN AIRPORT. |
FR3016222B1 (en) | 2014-01-03 | 2016-02-05 | Airbus Operations Sas | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR VERTICAL GUIDANCE OF AN AIRCRAFT DURING AN APPROACH TO A LANDING TRACK ALONG A LATERAL APPROACH TRACK |
US20150348423A1 (en) * | 2014-05-27 | 2015-12-03 | Honeywell International Inc. | System and method for economizing flight expenditures during aircraft descent and approach |
FR3024231B1 (en) * | 2014-07-28 | 2019-12-20 | Airbus Operations | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING AN OPERATIONAL DISTANCE FROM AN INDETERMINALLY TERMINATED SEGMENT OF AN AIRCRAFT FLIGHT PLAN. |
US9418561B2 (en) * | 2014-12-02 | 2016-08-16 | Honeywell International Inc. | System and method for displaying predictive conformal configuration cues for executing a landing |
CA2984425C (en) * | 2015-05-08 | 2023-10-10 | Bombardier Inc. | Systems and methods for assisting with aircraft landing |
FR3043473B1 (en) | 2015-11-05 | 2017-11-24 | Airbus Operations Sas | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR AIDING THE CONTROL OF AN AIRCRAFT FOR ENERGY MANAGEMENT DURING AN APPROACH PHASE. |
US10643480B2 (en) * | 2016-04-19 | 2020-05-05 | George Mason University | Method and apparatus for probabilistic alerting of aircraft unstabilized approaches using big data |
FR3058016B1 (en) * | 2016-10-21 | 2019-08-23 | Airbus Operations | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MANAGING CONFIGURATIONS OF AN AIRCRAFT. |
US11747360B2 (en) * | 2017-10-11 | 2023-09-05 | Embraer S.A. | Neural network system whose training is based on a combination of model and flight information for estimation of aircraft air data |
CN109866933B (en) * | 2017-12-01 | 2022-08-26 | 空客直升机 | Device for piloting an autogyro, associated display and corresponding method of piloting |
FR3089497A1 (en) * | 2018-12-10 | 2020-06-12 | Airbus Operations | Method and device for assisting the piloting of an aircraft when approaching a landing strip for a landing |
JP7560458B2 (en) * | 2018-12-11 | 2024-10-02 | イーグル エアロスペース,リミテッド | Method and software program for assessing aircraft landing and surface movement performance - Patents.com |
US11358733B2 (en) | 2020-01-21 | 2022-06-14 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Optimum idle descent start point display based on current conditions |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4368517A (en) * | 1978-03-16 | 1983-01-11 | Bunker Ramo Corporation | Aircraft landing display system |
US20030193410A1 (en) * | 2001-12-26 | 2003-10-16 | Chen Sherwin S. | Vertical situation display terrain/waypoint swath, range to target speed, and blended airplane reference |
US20040044446A1 (en) * | 2001-08-30 | 2004-03-04 | Honeywell International, Inc. | Avionics system for determining terminal flightpath |
US20040075586A1 (en) * | 2002-10-15 | 2004-04-22 | Glover John H. | Approach monitoring and advisory system and method |
US20040167685A1 (en) * | 2003-02-24 | 2004-08-26 | Ryan Dean E. | Runway overrun monitor and method for monitoring runway overruns |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP3526402B2 (en) * | 1998-05-29 | 2004-05-17 | 株式会社東芝 | Landing guidance system |
EP1200949B1 (en) * | 1999-07-30 | 2008-09-24 | The Boeing Company | Flight information display |
EP1461792A4 (en) * | 2001-10-11 | 2010-05-26 | Sandel Avionics Inc | Method and apparatus for reducing false taws warnings |
-
2005
- 2005-05-09 FR FR0504616A patent/FR2885439B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2006
- 2006-05-03 BR BRPI0612919-6A patent/BRPI0612919A2/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2006-05-03 CA CA2606821A patent/CA2606821C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2006-05-03 RU RU2007145408/28A patent/RU2351898C1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2006-05-03 EP EP06764587A patent/EP1880169B1/en not_active Ceased
- 2006-05-03 AT AT06764587T patent/ATE515681T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2006-05-03 CN CN2006800159651A patent/CN101171495B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2006-05-03 US US11/911,611 patent/US8346412B2/en active Active
- 2006-05-03 WO PCT/FR2006/000989 patent/WO2006120318A2/en active Application Filing
- 2006-05-03 JP JP2008510608A patent/JP5028411B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4368517A (en) * | 1978-03-16 | 1983-01-11 | Bunker Ramo Corporation | Aircraft landing display system |
US20040044446A1 (en) * | 2001-08-30 | 2004-03-04 | Honeywell International, Inc. | Avionics system for determining terminal flightpath |
US20030193410A1 (en) * | 2001-12-26 | 2003-10-16 | Chen Sherwin S. | Vertical situation display terrain/waypoint swath, range to target speed, and blended airplane reference |
US20040075586A1 (en) * | 2002-10-15 | 2004-04-22 | Glover John H. | Approach monitoring and advisory system and method |
US20040167685A1 (en) * | 2003-02-24 | 2004-08-26 | Ryan Dean E. | Runway overrun monitor and method for monitoring runway overruns |
Cited By (34)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8116989B2 (en) * | 2008-04-24 | 2012-02-14 | Airbus Operations Sas | Device and method for determining a runway state, aircraft comprising such a device and piloting assistance system using that runway state |
US20090292483A1 (en) * | 2008-04-24 | 2009-11-26 | Airbus France | Device and method for determining a runway state, aircraft comprising such a device and piloting assistance system using that runway state |
US20100217461A1 (en) * | 2009-02-25 | 2010-08-26 | Ramon Gomez Ledesma | Implementing continuous descent approaches for maximum predictability in aircraft |
US8442707B2 (en) * | 2009-02-25 | 2013-05-14 | The Boeing Company | Implementing continuous descent approaches for maximum predictability in aircraft |
US20130184902A1 (en) * | 2011-07-27 | 2013-07-18 | Eurocopter | Piloting assistance method, a piloting assistance device, and an aircraft |
US8843252B2 (en) * | 2011-07-27 | 2014-09-23 | Airbus Helicopters | Piloting assistance method, a piloting assistance device, and an aircraft |
US8864081B2 (en) * | 2011-07-29 | 2014-10-21 | Airbus Operations (Sas) | Method and device for an optimal management of the slats, the flaps and the landing gear of an aircraft |
US20130026299A1 (en) * | 2011-07-29 | 2013-01-31 | Airbus Operations (Sas) | Method And Device For An Optimal Management Of The Slats, The Flaps And The Landing Gear Of An Aircraft |
EP2581893A2 (en) * | 2011-10-11 | 2013-04-17 | The Boeing Company | Methods and systems for integrating runway status and layout |
EP2654029A3 (en) * | 2012-02-22 | 2016-07-13 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method for generating a flight display |
US9934692B2 (en) | 2012-02-22 | 2018-04-03 | Honeywell International Inc. | Display system and method for generating a display |
US8972141B2 (en) | 2012-03-30 | 2015-03-03 | Airbus Operations (Sas) | Method and system for controlling aircraft braking on a runway |
EP2763124A3 (en) * | 2013-02-05 | 2014-08-13 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method and apparatus for generating a virtual inner marker for an aircraft landing approach |
US9527601B2 (en) | 2013-02-05 | 2016-12-27 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method and apparatus for generating a virtual inner marker for an aircraft landing approach |
CN103963983A (en) * | 2013-02-05 | 2014-08-06 | 霍尼韦尔国际公司 | Method and apparatus for generating a virtual inner marker for an aircraft landing approach |
CN103197682A (en) * | 2013-03-22 | 2013-07-10 | 北京航空航天大学 | Unmanned aerial vehicle airport-entering landing gliding channel design and gliding path adjustment method |
US9114889B2 (en) | 2013-05-14 | 2015-08-25 | Thales | Method and system for monitoring aircraft flight phase on approach to a runway |
US9476733B2 (en) | 2014-03-28 | 2016-10-25 | Airbus Operations Sas | Method and system for assisting the piloting of an aircraft |
US9382016B2 (en) * | 2014-06-24 | 2016-07-05 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Aircraft landing monitor |
US20150367956A1 (en) * | 2014-06-24 | 2015-12-24 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Aircraft landing monitor |
US9399524B2 (en) | 2014-10-21 | 2016-07-26 | Honeywell International Inc. | System and method for displaying runway landing information |
EP3012590A1 (en) * | 2014-10-21 | 2016-04-27 | Honeywell International Inc. | System and method for displaying runway landing information |
US20170158349A1 (en) * | 2015-12-03 | 2017-06-08 | Airbus Operations Sas | Method and system for aiding landing of an aircraft |
US10384800B2 (en) * | 2015-12-03 | 2019-08-20 | Airbus Operations Sas | Method and system for aiding landing of an aircraft |
US10152195B2 (en) | 2015-12-14 | 2018-12-11 | Honeywell International Inc. | Aircraft display system pertaining to energy management |
US10134289B2 (en) * | 2016-02-18 | 2018-11-20 | Honeywell International Inc. | Methods and systems facilitating stabilized descent to a diversion airport |
US20180273200A1 (en) * | 2017-03-27 | 2018-09-27 | Honeywell International Inc. | Avionic display systems and methods for generating vertical situation displays including instability prediction and avoidance symbology |
US10654589B2 (en) * | 2017-03-27 | 2020-05-19 | Honeywell International Inc. | Avionic display systems and methods for generating vertical situation displays including instability prediction and avoidance symbology |
US11164469B2 (en) | 2018-03-28 | 2021-11-02 | Airbus Operations Sas | Method and system for aiding in the piloting of an aircraft |
US10839701B2 (en) | 2018-06-05 | 2020-11-17 | Honeywell International Inc. | Methods and systems for stabilized approach energy management |
US10854091B2 (en) * | 2018-07-03 | 2020-12-01 | Honeywell International Inc. | Energy management visualization methods and systems |
US10793286B1 (en) * | 2018-08-23 | 2020-10-06 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Vision based autonomous landing using flight path vector |
US20220189323A1 (en) * | 2020-12-10 | 2022-06-16 | Honeywell International Inc. | Dynamic radar vectoring guidance methods and systems |
US11842629B2 (en) * | 2020-12-10 | 2023-12-12 | Honeywell International Inc. | Dynamic radar vectoring guidance methods and systems |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP5028411B2 (en) | 2012-09-19 |
WO2006120318A3 (en) | 2007-10-25 |
WO2006120318A8 (en) | 2007-12-13 |
FR2885439B1 (en) | 2010-11-19 |
BRPI0612919A2 (en) | 2010-12-07 |
CA2606821A1 (en) | 2006-11-16 |
US8346412B2 (en) | 2013-01-01 |
EP1880169A2 (en) | 2008-01-23 |
ATE515681T1 (en) | 2011-07-15 |
WO2006120318A2 (en) | 2006-11-16 |
CN101171495A (en) | 2008-04-30 |
JP2008540228A (en) | 2008-11-20 |
RU2351898C1 (en) | 2009-04-10 |
CN101171495B (en) | 2010-09-08 |
FR2885439A1 (en) | 2006-11-10 |
EP1880169B1 (en) | 2011-07-06 |
CA2606821C (en) | 2014-07-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8346412B2 (en) | Method and device for assisting an aircraft flight control during landing approach | |
US9058742B2 (en) | Methods for illustrating aircraft situational information | |
CN106971632B (en) | Aircraft display system in connection with energy management | |
EP3012590B1 (en) | System and method for displaying runway landing information | |
JP4886794B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for assisting flight of aircraft during autonomous approach | |
EP2654029B1 (en) | Method for generating a flight display | |
US9008873B1 (en) | Methods and systems for landing decision point | |
EP3208787A2 (en) | Methods and systems facilitating stabilized descent to a diversion airport | |
US9511880B2 (en) | Flight deck display systems and methods for generating vertical speed alerts during steep approaches of rotary wing aircraft | |
US9058743B2 (en) | Automatic landing method and device for an aircraft on a strong slope runway | |
EP3364154B1 (en) | Cockpit display systems and methods for generating cockpit displays including direct approach energy management symbology | |
EP3992946A1 (en) | Method and system for updating a flight plan | |
US9476733B2 (en) | Method and system for assisting the piloting of an aircraft | |
US11817000B2 (en) | System and method to reduce runway occupancy time using pseudo threshold | |
US11733712B2 (en) | Systems and methods for generating displays for noise abatement departure procedures | |
CN109841094A (en) | A kind of forward sight alarm envelope curve modulator approach considering RNP and flight plan information | |
WO2009053964A2 (en) | Method and system for displaying flight related information | |
EP4012686A1 (en) | System and method to reduce runway occupancy time using pseudo threshold | |
US20230316937A1 (en) | System and method of response to an unstable approach during an approach to landing for an aircraft | |
Mahr et al. | Flight Crew Training Manual | |
Goerke et al. | A400M tactical ground collision avoidance system T-GCAS® | |
Owens | Operations | |
Bearce et al. | Flight Crew Training Manual |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: AIRBUS FRANCE,FRANCE Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LACAZE, ISABELLE;FOUCART, VINCENT;DE MENORVAL, JEAN-LOUIS;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:020055/0194 Effective date: 20070926 Owner name: AIRBUS FRANCE, FRANCE Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LACAZE, ISABELLE;FOUCART, VINCENT;DE MENORVAL, JEAN-LOUIS;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:020055/0194 Effective date: 20070926 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: AIRBUS OPERATIONS SAS, FRANCE Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:AIRBUS FRANCE;REEL/FRAME:026298/0269 Effective date: 20090630 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 8 |