US20060011906A1 - Ion implantation for suppression of defects in annealed SiGe layers - Google Patents
Ion implantation for suppression of defects in annealed SiGe layers Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20060011906A1 US20060011906A1 US10/890,765 US89076504A US2006011906A1 US 20060011906 A1 US20060011906 A1 US 20060011906A1 US 89076504 A US89076504 A US 89076504A US 2006011906 A1 US2006011906 A1 US 2006011906A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- layer
- relaxed sige
- sige alloy
- alloy layer
- energy
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 229910000577 Silicon-germanium Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims abstract description 92
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 73
- 238000005468 ion implantation Methods 0.000 title claims description 14
- 230000001629 suppression Effects 0.000 title 1
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 65
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 49
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 49
- 229910045601 alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 47
- 239000000956 alloy Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 47
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 27
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 27
- 239000012212 insulator Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 15
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 claims description 11
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 claims description 9
- 229910052710 silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000001590 oxidative effect Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 229910052731 fluorine Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- 229910052734 helium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 229910052796 boron Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000011261 inert gas Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052698 phosphorus Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910001218 Gallium arsenide Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000007943 implant Substances 0.000 description 14
- 238000002513 implantation Methods 0.000 description 11
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000000137 annealing Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000005530 etching Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 description 5
- LEVVHYCKPQWKOP-UHFFFAOYSA-N [Si].[Ge] Chemical compound [Si].[Ge] LEVVHYCKPQWKOP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicon Chemical compound [Si] XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229910052739 hydrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 238000002844 melting Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008018 melting Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000010703 silicon Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229910003811 SiGeC Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 229910021417 amorphous silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000001505 atmospheric-pressure chemical vapour deposition Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000013078 crystal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000005137 deposition process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004518 low pressure chemical vapour deposition Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001000 micrograph Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000879 optical micrograph Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000623 plasma-assisted chemical vapour deposition Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910021420 polycrystalline silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000000038 ultrahigh vacuum chemical vapour deposition Methods 0.000 description 2
- CBENFWSGALASAD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ozone Chemical compound [O-][O+]=O CBENFWSGALASAD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000002547 anomalous effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052786 argon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002800 charge carrier Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000295 complement effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013068 control sample Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000151 deposition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000407 epitaxy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052732 germanium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000010884 ion-beam technique Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052743 krypton Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910044991 metal oxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 150000004706 metal oxides Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229910003465 moissanite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910021421 monocrystalline silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910010271 silicon carbide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004627 transmission electron microscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035899 viability Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052724 xenon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L21/00—Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
- H01L21/02—Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof
- H01L21/04—Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof the devices having potential barriers, e.g. a PN junction, depletion layer or carrier concentration layer
- H01L21/18—Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof the devices having potential barriers, e.g. a PN junction, depletion layer or carrier concentration layer the devices having semiconductor bodies comprising elements of Group IV of the Periodic Table or AIIIBV compounds with or without impurities, e.g. doping materials
- H01L21/26—Bombardment with radiation
- H01L21/263—Bombardment with radiation with high-energy radiation
- H01L21/265—Bombardment with radiation with high-energy radiation producing ion implantation
- H01L21/26506—Bombardment with radiation with high-energy radiation producing ion implantation in group IV semiconductors
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L21/00—Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
- H01L21/02—Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof
- H01L21/02104—Forming layers
- H01L21/02365—Forming inorganic semiconducting materials on a substrate
- H01L21/02367—Substrates
- H01L21/0237—Materials
- H01L21/02373—Group 14 semiconducting materials
- H01L21/02381—Silicon, silicon germanium, germanium
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L21/00—Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
- H01L21/02—Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof
- H01L21/02104—Forming layers
- H01L21/02365—Forming inorganic semiconducting materials on a substrate
- H01L21/02518—Deposited layers
- H01L21/02521—Materials
- H01L21/02524—Group 14 semiconducting materials
- H01L21/02532—Silicon, silicon germanium, germanium
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L21/00—Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
- H01L21/02—Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof
- H01L21/02104—Forming layers
- H01L21/02365—Forming inorganic semiconducting materials on a substrate
- H01L21/02656—Special treatments
- H01L21/02664—Aftertreatments
- H01L21/02694—Controlling the interface between substrate and epitaxial layer, e.g. by ion implantation followed by annealing
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L21/00—Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
- H01L21/02—Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof
- H01L21/04—Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof the devices having potential barriers, e.g. a PN junction, depletion layer or carrier concentration layer
- H01L21/18—Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof the devices having potential barriers, e.g. a PN junction, depletion layer or carrier concentration layer the devices having semiconductor bodies comprising elements of Group IV of the Periodic Table or AIIIBV compounds with or without impurities, e.g. doping materials
- H01L21/26—Bombardment with radiation
- H01L21/263—Bombardment with radiation with high-energy radiation
- H01L21/265—Bombardment with radiation with high-energy radiation producing ion implantation
- H01L21/2658—Bombardment with radiation with high-energy radiation producing ion implantation of a molecular ion, e.g. decaborane
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a semiconductor substrate material, and more particularly to a semiconductor substrate material that includes a substantially relaxed, high-quality SiGe alloy layer.
- the SiGe alloy layer of the inventive semiconductor substrate material which is located on an upper surface thereof, has a reduced planar defect density as compared to prior art SiGe-containing substrate materials.
- the present invention also provides a method of fabricating the inventive substrate material in which the upper SiGe alloy layer of the substrate material has a reduced planar defect density.
- CMOS complementary metal oxide semiconductor
- Dislocation defects are generally reported in the prior art as threading defects, which are single defect lines that pass through, i.e., thread, a material layer.
- the density of the threading defects is generally reported in the range from 10 5 to 10 8 threads/cm 2 . Due to their lower density and lack of any reliable defect etching techniques, there has essentially been no discussions or reports of planar defects (stacking faults or microtwins) in the literature.
- planar defects are below 10 6 defects/cm 2 , it becomes unlikely that even low magnification plan-view transmission electron microscopy (TEM) can detect these defects. Even if a very large prepared area was made and one planar defect was detected after 20 or so frames, it would tend to be discounted as anomalous.
- TEM transmission electron microscopy
- planar defects are far more ubiquitous than previously thought. Planar defects most likely represent a far more serious threat to device operation than an isolated threading dislocation because in contrast to a threading dislocation, a planar defect represents an entire plane of broken or distorted atomic bonds and therefore defects of this type affect a larger cross-sectional area of the crystal.
- the present invention provides a method for suppressing the formation of planar defects, such as stacking faults and microtwins, in a relaxed SiGe alloy layer.
- the method of the present invention uses ion implantation into a structure that includes a strained Ge-containing layer and a Si-containing substrate in order to suppress the formation of planar defects formed within the Ge-containing layer during a subsequent relaxation anneal.
- the ion implant creates a damaged region at or below an interface formed between the Ge-containing layer and Si-containing substrate that has a sufficient threshold energy that is capable of suppressing planar defects.
- the Ge-containing layer includes a pure Ge layer as well as a SiGe alloy layer, while the Si-containing substrate includes bulk Si-containing substrates as well as silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrates.
- SOI silicon-on-insulator
- the method of the present invention comprises the steps of:
- the ions employed in the present invention create a damaged region within the structure that has sufficient threshold energy to suppress planar defect formation during the heating step.
- Illustrative examples of such ions that can be used in the present invention include, but are not limited to: H, He, Ne, C, O, F, B, P, Si or mixtures and isotopes thereof.
- O ions and their isotopes are preferred.
- H-containing ions (H, H 2 , CH 2 , etc.) and their isotopes are preferred.
- F ions and their isotopes are preferred.
- the present invention also provides a semiconductor substrate material that includes a high-quality, substantially relaxed SiGe alloy layer that has a planar defect density that is less than 5000 planar defects/cm 2 .
- FIGS. 1A-1E are pictorial representations (through cross sectional views) illustrating the basic processing steps of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is a plot showing the measured planar defect density (defect/cm 2 ) vs. oxygen (O) dose (10 14 atoms/cm 2 ) for an O energy of 169 and 80 keV.
- FIG. 3A shows an optical defect micrograph of a relaxed SiGe layer that received no H implant prior to the relaxation step.
- FIG. 3B shows an optical defect micrograph of a relaxed SiGe layer which received a H implantation step of 19 keV H 2 + at a dose of 1.3 ⁇ 10 16 H 2 + /cm 2 prior to the relaxation step.
- the present invention which provides a method of fabricating a substantially relaxed SiGe alloys layer on a Si-containing substrate as well as the resultant substrate material and heterostructure containing the same, will now be described in greater detail by referring to the drawings that accompany the present application.
- like and/or corresponding elements are referred to by like reference numerals.
- FIGS. 1A-1E illustrate the basic processing steps that are employed in forming a substantially relaxed SiGe alloy layer having a suppressed planar defect density.
- FIG. 1A shows the initial structure that is formed after forming a strained Ge-containing layer 14 on a surface of a Si-containing substrate 10 .
- the interface that exists between the Ge-containing layer 14 and the Si-containing substrate 10 is labeled as reference numeral 12 in FIG. 1A .
- the term “Si-containing substrate” as used herein denotes any semiconductor material that includes silicon.
- Si-containing substrates that can be employed in the present invention include, but are not limited to: Si, SiGe, SiC, SiGeC, Si/Si, Si/SiC, Si/SiGeC and preformed silicon-on-insulators (SOIs) which may include any number of buried insulating (continuous, non-continuous or mixtures of continuous and non-continuous) regions present therein.
- SOIs silicon-on-insulators
- the strained Ge-containing layer 14 formed at this point of the present invention may be a SiGe alloy layer or a pure Ge layer.
- SiGe alloy layer includes SiGe alloys that comprise up to 99.99 atomic percent Ge, whereas pure Ge includes layers that comprise 100 atomic percent Ge.
- the Ge content in the SiGe alloy layer be from about 0.1 to about 99.9 atomic percent, with a Ge atomic percent of from about 10 to about 35 being even more highly preferred.
- a strained Ge-containing layer 14 is formed atop an upper surface of the Si-containing substrate 10 forming interface 12 using any conventional epitaxial growth method that is well known to those skilled in the art which is capable of (i) growing a thermodynamically stable (below a critical thickness) SiGe alloy or pure Ge layer, (ii) growing a SiGe alloy or pure Ge layer that is metastable and free from defects, i.e., misfit and TD dislocations, or (iii) growing a partially relaxed SiGe layer, yet strained; the extent of relaxation being controlled by growth temperature, Ge concentration, thickness, or the presence of a Si-containing capping layer.
- Illustrative examples of such epitaxial growing processes that are capable of satisfying conditions (i), (ii) or (iii) include, but are not limited to: low-pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD), ultra-high vacuum chemical vapor deposition (UHVCVD), atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition (APCVD), molecular beam (MBE) epitaxy and plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD).
- LPCVD low-pressure chemical vapor deposition
- UHVCVD ultra-high vacuum chemical vapor deposition
- APCVD atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition
- MBE molecular beam epitaxy
- PECVD plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition
- the thickness of the strained Ge-containing layer 14 formed at this point of the present invention may vary, but typically the Ge-containing layer 14 has a thickness from about 10 to about 500 nm, with a thickness from about 20 to about 200 nm being more highly preferred.
- an optional cap layer is formed atop Ge-containing layer 14 at this point of the present invention, i.e., prior to ion implantation and performing the heating step of the present invention.
- the optional cap layer employed in the present invention comprises any Si-containing material including, but not limited to: epitaxial silicon (epi-Si), epitaxial silicon-germanium (epi-SiGe), amorphous silicon (a:Si), amorphous silicon-germanium (a: SiGe), single or polycrystalline Si or any combination thereof including multilayers.
- the optional cap layer is comprised of epi Si. It is noted that layer 14 and the optional cap layer may, or may not, be formed in the same reaction chamber.
- the optional cap layer has a thickness from about 1 to about 100 nm, with a thickness from about 1 to about 30 nm being more highly preferred.
- the optional cap layer is formed utilizing any well-known deposition process including the epitaxial growth processes mentioned above.
- a pure Ge or SiGe alloy (15 to 20 atomic percent Ge) layer 14 having a thickness from about 1 to about 2000 nm on the surface of the Si-containing substrate 10 , and thereafter form a Si-containing cap layer having a thickness from about 1 to about 100 nm atop the Ge-containing layer 14 .
- ions 16 are implanted into the structure shown in FIG. 1A (or a structure including an optional cap layer atop layer 14 ) such that a damaged region is located at or below interface 12 .
- Reference numeral 15 denotes the damaged region that is formed during this ion implantation step.
- the ion implantation can be a blanket ion implantation process as shown, or alternatively, a masked ion implantation process (not shown) can be utilized. Masked ion implantation provides a means for fabricating discrete regions in which a substantially relaxed SiGe alloy layer having reduced planar defects could be formed adjacent to a relaxed SiGe alloy layer that does not contain the suppressed planar defect density.
- ion implantation is performed using a conventional ion implantation apparatus wherein at least one ion of H, He, Ne, C, O, F, B, P or Si, including isotopes thereof, is used.
- Preferred ions employed in the present invention for suppressing planar defect formation are O, F or H ions, or any isotope thereof, implanted using any molecular or charge state.
- the damaged region 15 formed at this point of the present invention has a threshold energy value that is sufficient to suppress planar defects from forming during the subsequent heating step and depends on the mass of the implanted ion.
- the damaged region 15 is typically formed about 0 to about 500 ⁇ below the interface 12 .
- An important role of the implantation step is to deposit energy from the incoming ions to the lattice atoms at or near the interface 12 .
- the transferral of kinetic energy from the ions to the target atoms near interface 12 results in the formation of vacancies, phonons, recoiled atoms and other lattice defects. It is believed that the lattice defects near interface 12 caused by the energy deposition inhibits the formation of planar defects, such as stacking faults, during the subsequent SiGe alloy layer relaxation step.
- the implant conditions used in forming the damaged region 15 vary depending upon the type of ions 16 being implanted.
- the supression of stacking faults during relaxation of the SiGe alloy layer appears to be related to damage produced near the interface 12 .
- the amount of damage created by the implant step is related to the amount of energy transferred from the incoming ions to the lattice atoms.
- the energy deposited within a given region of the initial structure can be estimated using available software code such as SRIM, see, J. F. Ziegler, et al., “The Stopping and Range of Ions Solids”, Version 2003.20.
- the relevant energy terms from a typical SRIM calculation are the energy converted into phonons and the energy transferred to recoils.
- the energy converted to phonons near the interface 12 must be greater than 2.5 ⁇ 10 15 in units of (electron-volts per Angstrom) per cm 2 . These units are the output of the SRIM calculation for the energy loss to phonons (eV/ ⁇ ) at the interface 12 multiplied by the required dose.
- the energy transferred to recoils calculated using SRIM near the interface 12 must be greater than 2.5 ⁇ 10 15 in units of (electron-volts per Angstrom) per cm 2 . It is possible to specify the energy transferred from the ions to the lattice atoms in the region at or near interface 12 as the sum of the energy loss to phonons and the energy transferred to recoils using the abovementioned procedures.
- the relationship between ion species, energy and dose necessary to suppress stacking fault formation is determined by the condition that the sum of the energy loss to phonons and the energy transferred to recoils calculated using SRIM near interface 12 be greater than 5 ⁇ 10 5 (eV/ ⁇ )(cm ⁇ 2 ).
- the structure to be implanted is inputted into SRIM as well as the selected ion species and energy.
- the values of the energy loss to phonons and the energy transferred to recoils at the position of interface 12 are added together and the threshold value between 5 ⁇ 10 15 to 15 ⁇ 10 15 is divided by this number to give the ion dose range (in atoms/cm 2 ).
- the lower limit of the threshold energy value (5 ⁇ 10 15 (eV/ ⁇ )(cm ⁇ 2 )) is determined by the required energy density to create sufficient lattice damage near interface 12 to suppress planar defect formation during subsequent annealing.
- the upper limit of the threshold energy value (15 ⁇ 10 15 (eV/ ⁇ )(cm 2 )) is determined by staying below the energy density that will amorphize all or part of the SiGe alloy layer. This range is sensitive to the temperature of the substrate during implantation as well as ion beam current densities. Chilled (lower than 20° C.) and heated (greater than 20° C.) implantation steps are both contemplated herein.
- the prescription given above can be used to estimate the required dose for any ion/energy combination that will result in a lower planar defect density during relaxation of the SiGe alloy layer.
- the ions are implanted using an ion dosage from about 1 ⁇ 10 14 to about 3 ⁇ 10 16 atoms/cm 2 , with an ion dosage from about 2 ⁇ 10 14 to about 2.8 ⁇ 10 16 atoms/cm 2 being more typical.
- the ion implantation is typically carried out in an ion implantation apparatus that operates at a beam current density from about 0.05 to about 50 milliamps cm ⁇ 2 and at an energy from about 4 to about 250 keV. More preferably, the implant is performed using an energy from about 5 to about 200 keV.
- the implant generally is performed at a substrate temperature from about ⁇ 50° to about 550° C. A single implant step can be employed, or multiple implant steps can be used as well.
- O ions are implanted into the structure shown in FIG. 1A .
- the O implantation is performed using an O ion dose from about 1 ⁇ 10 14 to about 1 ⁇ 10 16 atoms/cm 2 , with an O ion dose from about 5 ⁇ 10 14 to about 5 ⁇ 10 15 atoms/cm 2 being more typical.
- the O implantation is performed using an implant energy from about 50 to about 500 keV, with an oxygen implant energy from about 80 to about 250 keV being more typical.
- H ions are implanted into the structure shown in FIG. 1A .
- the H implantation is performed using an H ion dose from about 1 ⁇ 10 16 to about 3 ⁇ 10 16 atoms/cm 2 , with an H ion dose from about 1.5 ⁇ 10 16 to about 2.8 ⁇ 10 16 atoms/cm 2 being more typical.
- the H implantation is performed using an implant energy from about 4 to about 50 keV, with an oxygen implant energy from about 5 to about 40 keV being more typical.
- the structure shown in FIG. 1B is then heated, i.e., annealed, at a temperature which can permits relaxation of the SiGe alloy layer 14 .
- the substrate 10 is part of a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate, then the heating step can be used to form a SGOI layer in a manner described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/055,138, filed Jan. 23, 2003, entitled “Method of Creating High-Quality Relaxed SiGe-On-Insulator for Strained Si CMOS Applications”.
- the SGOI formed using the thermal mixing technique ( FIG. 1C ) in conjunction with the implantation step described here will have a lower stacking fault density than if no implantation was performed.
- oxide layer 24 is formed atop layer 20 during the heating step.
- Oxide layer 24 is typically, but not always, removed from the structure after the heating step using a conventional wet etch process wherein a chemical etchant such as HF that has a high selectivity for removing oxide as compared to SiGe is employed. If substrate 10 is not part of a SOI substrate, the heating step relaxes the SiGe layer 14 while suppressing planar defect generation.
- a single crystal Si-containing layer (not shown) can be formed atop layer 20 and the above processing steps of the present invention may be repeated any number of times to produce a multilayered relaxed SiGe substrate material.
- the oxide layer 24 formed after the heating step of the present invention has a variable thickness which may range from about 10 to about 1000 nm, with a thickness from about 20 to about 500 nm being more typical.
- the heating step of the present invention is an annealing step that is performed at a high temperature from about 900° C. to about 1350° C., with a temperature from about 1200° C. to about 1335° C. being more highly preferred when the substrate 10 is part of a SOI substrate.
- the heating step of the present invention is carried out in an oxidizing ambient which includes at least one oxygen-containing gas such as O 2 , NO, N 2 O, ozone, air and other like oxygen-containing gases.
- the oxygen-containing gas may be admixed with each other (such as an admixture of O 2 and NO), or the gas may be diluted with an inert gas such as He, Ar, N 2 , Xe, Kr, or Ne.
- a preferred temperature range from 800° C. to about 1050° C. is used in the present invention when the substrate 10 is a non-SOI substrate to prevent Ge loss into the substrate 10 during the anneal.
- An oxidizing or non-oxidizing ambient can be used during the annealing step when substrate 10 is a non-SOI substrate.
- the heating step may be carried out for a variable period of time that typically ranges from about 10 to about 1800 minutes, with a time period from about 60 to about 600 minutes being more highly preferred.
- the heating step may be carried out at a single targeted temperature, or various ramp and soak cycles using various ramp rates and soak times can be employed.
- the heating step is performed under an oxidizing ambient to achieve the presence of a surface oxide layer, i.e., layer 24 , which acts as a diffusion barrier to Ge atoms. Therefore, once the oxide layer 24 is formed on the surface of the structure, Ge becomes trapped between barrier layer 22 and oxide layer 24 . As the surface oxide increases in thickness, the Ge becomes more uniformly distributed throughout layers 10 , 14 , and optionally the cap layer, but it is continually and efficiently rejected from the encroaching oxide layer. So as the (now homogenized) layers are thinned during this heating step, the relative Ge fraction increases. Efficient thermal mixing is achieved in this embodiment of the present invention when the heating step is carried out at a temperature of from about 1200° C. to about 1320° C. in a diluted oxygen-containing gas.
- the role of the high-temperature heating step of the present invention is (1) to form a barrier layer 22 that is resistant to Ge diffusion in the Si-containing substrate, (2) to allow Ge atoms to diffuse more quickly thereby maintaining a homogeneous distribution during annealing, and (3) to subject the initial layered structure to a thermal budget which will facilitate an equilibrium configuration.
- the heating step can also increase the degree of relaxation of the initial strained Ge-containing layer 14 .
- the structure includes a uniform and substantially relaxed SiGe alloy layer, i.e., layer 20 , sandwiched between the barrier layer 22 and surface oxide layer 24 .
- the ions implanted previously into the structure facilitate the relaxation of the strained Ge-containing layer 14 , while effectively suppressing planar defects such as stacking faults and microtwins from forming during the thermal mixing process.
- planar defects such as stacking faults and microtwins from forming during the thermal mixing process.
- the mechanism for this phenomenon has not been extensively studied by the applicants.
- the substantially relaxed SiGe alloy layer 20 has a thickness of about 2000 nm or less, with a thickness from about 10 to about 100 nm being more highly preferred.
- the barrier layer 22 formed during the annealing step of the present invention has a thickness of about 500 nm or less, with a thickness from about 50 to about 200 nm being more highly preferred.
- the substantially relaxed SiGe alloy layer 20 formed in the present invention has a defect density including misfits and TDs, of less than about 5 ⁇ 10 7 defects/cm 2 . This defect density value approaches those reported for contemporary SGOI materials.
- the SiGe alloy layer 20 of the present invention has a reduced planar defect density than that achieved using prior art methods.
- the SiGe alloy layer 20 has a planar defect density that is less than 5000 planar defects/cm 2 , with a planar defect density of less than 100 planar defects/cm 2 being more typical.
- the planar defects, particularly the stacking faults can be measured using the etching technique described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/654,231, which application was previously incorporated herein in its entirety. Note that when the defect etching technique described in the '231 application is employed, a strained Si layer, to be subsequently described herein, is formed atop the relaxed SiGe alloy layer 20 prior to etching.
- the substantially relaxed SiGe alloy layer 20 formed in the present invention has a final Ge content of from about 0.1 to about 99.9 atomic percent, with an atomic percent of Ge of from about 10 to about 35 being more highly preferred.
- Another characteristic feature of the substantially relaxed SiGe layer 20 is that it has a measured lattice relaxation of from about 1 to about 100%, with a measured lattice relaxation of from about 50 to about 80% being more highly preferred.
- the surface oxide layer 24 may be stripped at this point of the present invention so as to provide the SiGe-on-insulator substrate material shown, for example, in FIG. 1D (note that the substrate material does not include the cap layer since that layer has been used in forming the relaxed SiGe layer).
- FIG. 1E show the structure that is obtained after forming a Si-containing layer 26 atop the SiGe layer 20 .
- Si-containing layer 26 is formed using a conventional epitaxial deposition process well known in the art.
- the thickness of the Si-containing layer 26 may vary, but typically, the Si-containing layer 26 has a thickness from about 1 to about 100 nm, with a thickness from about 1 to about 30 nm being more highly preferred.
- the Si-containing layer 26 may include: epitaxial silicon (epi-Si), epitaxial silicon-germanium (epi-SiGe), amorphous silicon (a:Si), amorphous silicon-germanium (a: SiGe), single or polycrystalline Si or any combination thereof including multilayers.
- additional SiGe can be formed atop the substantially relaxed SiGe layer 20 utilizing the above mentioned processing steps, and thereafter the Si-containing layer 26 may be formed. Because layer 20 has a large in-plane lattice parameter as compared to layer 26 , Si-containing layer 26 will be strained in a tensile manner.
- the present invention also contemplates superlattice structures as well as lattice mismatched structures which include at least the SiGe-on-insulator substrate material of the present invention.
- superlattice structures such structures would include at least the substantially relaxed SiGe-on-insulator substrate material of the present invention, and alternating layers Si and SiGe formed atop the substantially relaxed SiGe layer of the substrate material.
- GaAs, GaP or other like compound would be formed atop the substantially relaxed SiGe layer of the inventive SiGe-on-insulator substrate material.
- FIG. 2 is a plot of the measured planar defect density vs. O implantation dose for an O energy of 80 and 169 keV.
- the initially formed SiGe layer was a 1000 ⁇ -17% pseudomorphic SiGe layer on an SOI substrate.
- the thermal processing step was a 1250° C. step to form a uniform 800 ⁇ -21% (80 keV) and a 750 ⁇ -23% (169 keV) relaxed SiGe-on-insulator substrate material which was then capped with a 180 ⁇ strained Si layer.
- the defects were measured using the chemical defect etching described in the '231 application mentioned supra. The data points in FIG.
- the critical dose for 80 keV oxygen is about 4E14 O/cm 2 whereas for 169 keV oxygen it is about 7E14 O/cm 2 .
- FIGS. 3A and 3B show an example of using H 2 + ions to suppress SF defects.
- the initially formed SiGe layer was a 1000 ⁇ -17% pseudomorphic SiGe layer on an SOI substrate.
- 19 keV H 2 + ions were implanted into the structure at a dose of 1.3E16H 2 /cm 2 .
- the thermal processing step was a 1250° C. step to form a uniform 800 ⁇ -21%.
- the surface oxide was removed and a 180 ⁇ Si layer was grown in order to defect etch the samples according to the '231 application.
- FIG. 3A shows the optical micrograph of the etched control sample (no implant) and
- FIG. 3B shows the optical micrograph of the sample which received the H implant before annealing.
- the critical dose of about 2.5E16H/cm 2 for 9.5 keV H was simulated to give a threshold energy value at the interface 12 of 10.7E15 (eV/ ⁇ )(cm 2 ) using SR
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Condensed Matter Physics & Semiconductors (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Microelectronics & Electronic Packaging (AREA)
- Power Engineering (AREA)
- High Energy & Nuclear Physics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Toxicology (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Spectroscopy & Molecular Physics (AREA)
- Recrystallisation Techniques (AREA)
- Physical Vapour Deposition (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This application is related to co-pending and co-assigned U.S. Patent application Ser. No. 10/654,231, filed Sep. 3, 2003, entitled “Method of Measuring Crystal Defects in Thin Si/SiGe Bilayers” as well as co-pending and co-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/055,138, filed Jan. 23, 2003, entitled “Method of Creating High-Quality Relaxed SiGe-On-Insulator for Strained Si CMOS Applications”. The entire contents of each of the aforementioned U.S. Applications are incorporated herein by reference.
- The present invention relates to a semiconductor substrate material, and more particularly to a semiconductor substrate material that includes a substantially relaxed, high-quality SiGe alloy layer. The SiGe alloy layer of the inventive semiconductor substrate material, which is located on an upper surface thereof, has a reduced planar defect density as compared to prior art SiGe-containing substrate materials. The present invention also provides a method of fabricating the inventive substrate material in which the upper SiGe alloy layer of the substrate material has a reduced planar defect density.
- In the semiconductor industry, the use of relaxed SiGe layers as a template for strained Si layer growth has been the primary approach employed to create tensile-strained Si for possible use in high-performance complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) circuits. The strained Si layers provide improved charge carrier transportation compared to unstrained materials.
- The viability of using such materials in mainstream CMOS applications will ultimately depend on manufacturing issues such as cost and circuit yield. Because most techniques for creating a relaxed SiGe layer involve plastically deforming an initially pseudomorphic strained Si film, residual dislocation defects tend to be present in all relaxed SiGe and strained Si materials. Thus, in addition to yield challenges inherent to any material change in CMOS processing, the additional challenge of defect-related yield issues will exist as well.
- To minimize this challenge, many approaches have been created in an attempt to reduce the dislocation defect density in relaxed SiGe and strained Si layers. Dislocation defects are generally reported in the prior art as threading defects, which are single defect lines that pass through, i.e., thread, a material layer. The density of the threading defects is generally reported in the range from 105 to 108 threads/cm2. Due to their lower density and lack of any reliable defect etching techniques, there has essentially been no discussions or reports of planar defects (stacking faults or microtwins) in the literature.
- Because typical densities of planar defects are below 106 defects/cm2, it becomes unlikely that even low magnification plan-view transmission electron microscopy (TEM) can detect these defects. Even if a very large prepared area was made and one planar defect was detected after 20 or so frames, it would tend to be discounted as anomalous.
- A recent defect etch that was developed (see, U.S. application Ser. No. 10/654,231, filed Sep. 3, 2003, which has been incorporated herein by reference) to study strained Si and SiGe layers has shown that planar defects are far more ubiquitous than previously thought. Planar defects most likely represent a far more serious threat to device operation than an isolated threading dislocation because in contrast to a threading dislocation, a planar defect represents an entire plane of broken or distorted atomic bonds and therefore defects of this type affect a larger cross-sectional area of the crystal.
- In view of the serious threat of planar defects, there is a need for developing a method to reduce stacking faults and other planar defects in strained Si/relaxed SiGe technologies.
- The present invention provides a method for suppressing the formation of planar defects, such as stacking faults and microtwins, in a relaxed SiGe alloy layer. Specifically, the method of the present invention uses ion implantation into a structure that includes a strained Ge-containing layer and a Si-containing substrate in order to suppress the formation of planar defects formed within the Ge-containing layer during a subsequent relaxation anneal. The ion implant creates a damaged region at or below an interface formed between the Ge-containing layer and Si-containing substrate that has a sufficient threshold energy that is capable of suppressing planar defects.
- The Ge-containing layer includes a pure Ge layer as well as a SiGe alloy layer, while the Si-containing substrate includes bulk Si-containing substrates as well as silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrates. The method of the present invention provides a significant reduction (on the order of several orders of magnitude) in the planar defect density compared to controlled (non-implanted) SiGe layers.
- In broad terms, the method of the present invention comprises the steps of:
-
- forming a Ge-containing layer having strain on a surface of a Si-containing substrate;
- implanting ions to create a damaged region at or below an interface between said Ge-containing layer and said Si-containing substrate; and
- heating said Ge-containing layer and said Si-containing substrate containing said damaged region at a temperature which forms at least a substantially relaxed SiGe alloy layer, wherein said damaged region suppresses planar defects from forming during said heating step.
- As indicated above, the ions employed in the present invention create a damaged region within the structure that has sufficient threshold energy to suppress planar defect formation during the heating step. Illustrative examples of such ions that can be used in the present invention include, but are not limited to: H, He, Ne, C, O, F, B, P, Si or mixtures and isotopes thereof. In one embodiment, O ions and their isotopes are preferred. In an alternate embodiment, H-containing ions (H, H2, CH2, etc.) and their isotopes are preferred. In still another embodiment, F ions and their isotopes are preferred.
- The present invention also provides a semiconductor substrate material that includes a high-quality, substantially relaxed SiGe alloy layer that has a planar defect density that is less than 5000 planar defects/cm2.
-
FIGS. 1A-1E are pictorial representations (through cross sectional views) illustrating the basic processing steps of the present invention. -
FIG. 2 is a plot showing the measured planar defect density (defect/cm2) vs. oxygen (O) dose (1014 atoms/cm2) for an O energy of 169 and 80 keV. -
FIG. 3A shows an optical defect micrograph of a relaxed SiGe layer that received no H implant prior to the relaxation step. -
FIG. 3B shows an optical defect micrograph of a relaxed SiGe layer which received a H implantation step of 19 keV H2 + at a dose of 1.3×1016H2 +/cm2 prior to the relaxation step. - The present invention, which provides a method of fabricating a substantially relaxed SiGe alloys layer on a Si-containing substrate as well as the resultant substrate material and heterostructure containing the same, will now be described in greater detail by referring to the drawings that accompany the present application. In the drawings, like and/or corresponding elements are referred to by like reference numerals.
- Reference is first made to
FIGS. 1A-1E which illustrate the basic processing steps that are employed in forming a substantially relaxed SiGe alloy layer having a suppressed planar defect density. Specifically,FIG. 1A shows the initial structure that is formed after forming a strained Ge-containinglayer 14 on a surface of a Si-containingsubstrate 10. The interface that exists between the Ge-containinglayer 14 and the Si-containingsubstrate 10 is labeled asreference numeral 12 inFIG. 1A . The term “Si-containing substrate” as used herein denotes any semiconductor material that includes silicon. Illustrative examples of suitable Si-containing substrates that can be employed in the present invention include, but are not limited to: Si, SiGe, SiC, SiGeC, Si/Si, Si/SiC, Si/SiGeC and preformed silicon-on-insulators (SOIs) which may include any number of buried insulating (continuous, non-continuous or mixtures of continuous and non-continuous) regions present therein. - The strained Ge-containing
layer 14 formed at this point of the present invention may be a SiGe alloy layer or a pure Ge layer. The term “SiGe alloy layer” includes SiGe alloys that comprise up to 99.99 atomic percent Ge, whereas pure Ge includes layers that comprise 100 atomic percent Ge. When SiGe alloy layers are employed, it is preferred that the Ge content in the SiGe alloy layer be from about 0.1 to about 99.9 atomic percent, with a Ge atomic percent of from about 10 to about 35 being even more highly preferred. - In accordance with the present invention, a strained Ge-containing
layer 14 is formed atop an upper surface of the Si-containingsubstrate 10 forminginterface 12 using any conventional epitaxial growth method that is well known to those skilled in the art which is capable of (i) growing a thermodynamically stable (below a critical thickness) SiGe alloy or pure Ge layer, (ii) growing a SiGe alloy or pure Ge layer that is metastable and free from defects, i.e., misfit and TD dislocations, or (iii) growing a partially relaxed SiGe layer, yet strained; the extent of relaxation being controlled by growth temperature, Ge concentration, thickness, or the presence of a Si-containing capping layer. - Illustrative examples of such epitaxial growing processes that are capable of satisfying conditions (i), (ii) or (iii) include, but are not limited to: low-pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD), ultra-high vacuum chemical vapor deposition (UHVCVD), atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition (APCVD), molecular beam (MBE) epitaxy and plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD).
- The thickness of the strained Ge-containing
layer 14 formed at this point of the present invention may vary, but typically the Ge-containinglayer 14 has a thickness from about 10 to about 500 nm, with a thickness from about 20 to about 200 nm being more highly preferred. - In an optional embodiment of the present invention (not shown), an optional cap layer is formed atop Ge-containing
layer 14 at this point of the present invention, i.e., prior to ion implantation and performing the heating step of the present invention. The optional cap layer employed in the present invention comprises any Si-containing material including, but not limited to: epitaxial silicon (epi-Si), epitaxial silicon-germanium (epi-SiGe), amorphous silicon (a:Si), amorphous silicon-germanium (a: SiGe), single or polycrystalline Si or any combination thereof including multilayers. In a preferred embodiment, the optional cap layer is comprised of epi Si. It is noted thatlayer 14 and the optional cap layer may, or may not, be formed in the same reaction chamber. - When present, the optional cap layer has a thickness from about 1 to about 100 nm, with a thickness from about 1 to about 30 nm being more highly preferred. The optional cap layer is formed utilizing any well-known deposition process including the epitaxial growth processes mentioned above.
- In one embodiment of the present invention, it is preferred to form a pure Ge or SiGe alloy (15 to 20 atomic percent Ge)
layer 14 having a thickness from about 1 to about 2000 nm on the surface of the Si-containingsubstrate 10, and thereafter form a Si-containing cap layer having a thickness from about 1 to about 100 nm atop the Ge-containinglayer 14. - Next, and as shown in
FIG. 1B ,ions 16 are implanted into the structure shown inFIG. 1A (or a structure including an optional cap layer atop layer 14) such that a damaged region is located at or belowinterface 12.Reference numeral 15 denotes the damaged region that is formed during this ion implantation step. The ion implantation can be a blanket ion implantation process as shown, or alternatively, a masked ion implantation process (not shown) can be utilized. Masked ion implantation provides a means for fabricating discrete regions in which a substantially relaxed SiGe alloy layer having reduced planar defects could be formed adjacent to a relaxed SiGe alloy layer that does not contain the suppressed planar defect density. - Specifically, ion implantation is performed using a conventional ion implantation apparatus wherein at least one ion of H, He, Ne, C, O, F, B, P or Si, including isotopes thereof, is used. Preferred ions employed in the present invention for suppressing planar defect formation are O, F or H ions, or any isotope thereof, implanted using any molecular or charge state.
- The damaged
region 15 formed at this point of the present invention has a threshold energy value that is sufficient to suppress planar defects from forming during the subsequent heating step and depends on the mass of the implanted ion. The damagedregion 15 is typically formed about 0 to about 500 Å below theinterface 12. An important role of the implantation step is to deposit energy from the incoming ions to the lattice atoms at or near theinterface 12. The transferral of kinetic energy from the ions to the target atoms nearinterface 12 results in the formation of vacancies, phonons, recoiled atoms and other lattice defects. It is believed that the lattice defects nearinterface 12 caused by the energy deposition inhibits the formation of planar defects, such as stacking faults, during the subsequent SiGe alloy layer relaxation step. - The implant conditions used in forming the damaged
region 15 vary depending upon the type ofions 16 being implanted. The supression of stacking faults during relaxation of the SiGe alloy layer appears to be related to damage produced near theinterface 12. The amount of damage created by the implant step is related to the amount of energy transferred from the incoming ions to the lattice atoms. The energy deposited within a given region of the initial structure can be estimated using available software code such as SRIM, see, J. F. Ziegler, et al., “The Stopping and Range of Ions Solids”, Version 2003.20. The relevant energy terms from a typical SRIM calculation are the energy converted into phonons and the energy transferred to recoils. The energy converted to phonons near theinterface 12 must be greater than 2.5×1015 in units of (electron-volts per Angstrom) per cm2. These units are the output of the SRIM calculation for the energy loss to phonons (eV/Å) at theinterface 12 multiplied by the required dose. In a similar manner, the energy transferred to recoils calculated using SRIM near theinterface 12 must be greater than 2.5×1015 in units of (electron-volts per Angstrom) per cm2. It is possible to specify the energy transferred from the ions to the lattice atoms in the region at or nearinterface 12 as the sum of the energy loss to phonons and the energy transferred to recoils using the abovementioned procedures. Therefore, the relationship between ion species, energy and dose necessary to suppress stacking fault formation is determined by the condition that the sum of the energy loss to phonons and the energy transferred to recoils calculated using SRIM nearinterface 12 be greater than 5×105 (eV/Å)(cm−2). To estimate the dose required to suppress stacking faults for a given ion species and energy, the structure to be implanted is inputted into SRIM as well as the selected ion species and energy. The values of the energy loss to phonons and the energy transferred to recoils at the position ofinterface 12 are added together and the threshold value between 5×1015 to 15×1015 is divided by this number to give the ion dose range (in atoms/cm2). The lower limit of the threshold energy value (5×1015 (eV/Å)(cm−2)) is determined by the required energy density to create sufficient lattice damage nearinterface 12 to suppress planar defect formation during subsequent annealing. The upper limit of the threshold energy value (15×1015 (eV/Å)(cm2)) is determined by staying below the energy density that will amorphize all or part of the SiGe alloy layer. This range is sensitive to the temperature of the substrate during implantation as well as ion beam current densities. Chilled (lower than 20° C.) and heated (greater than 20° C.) implantation steps are both contemplated herein. - The prescription given above can be used to estimate the required dose for any ion/energy combination that will result in a lower planar defect density during relaxation of the SiGe alloy layer. Typically, the ions are implanted using an ion dosage from about 1×1014 to about 3×1016 atoms/cm2, with an ion dosage from about 2×1014 to about 2.8×1016 atoms/cm2 being more typical. The ion implantation is typically carried out in an ion implantation apparatus that operates at a beam current density from about 0.05 to about 50 milliamps cm−2 and at an energy from about 4 to about 250 keV. More preferably, the implant is performed using an energy from about 5 to about 200 keV. The implant generally is performed at a substrate temperature from about −50° to about 550° C. A single implant step can be employed, or multiple implant steps can be used as well.
- In a highly preferred embodiment of the present invention, O ions are implanted into the structure shown in
FIG. 1A . In this embodiment of the present invention, the O implantation is performed using an O ion dose from about 1×1014 to about 1×1016 atoms/cm2, with an O ion dose from about 5×1014 to about 5×1015 atoms/cm2 being more typical. The O implantation is performed using an implant energy from about 50 to about 500 keV, with an oxygen implant energy from about 80 to about 250 keV being more typical. - In another preferred embodiment of the present invention, H ions are implanted into the structure shown in
FIG. 1A . In this embodiment of the present invention, the H implantation is performed using an H ion dose from about 1×1016 to about 3×1016 atoms/cm2, with an H ion dose from about 1.5×1016 to about 2.8×1016 atoms/cm2 being more typical. The H implantation is performed using an implant energy from about 4 to about 50 keV, with an oxygen implant energy from about 5 to about 40 keV being more typical. - After ion implantation, the structure shown in
FIG. 1B is then heated, i.e., annealed, at a temperature which can permits relaxation of theSiGe alloy layer 14. If thesubstrate 10 is part of a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate, then the heating step can be used to form a SGOI layer in a manner described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/055,138, filed Jan. 23, 2003, entitled “Method of Creating High-Quality Relaxed SiGe-On-Insulator for Strained Si CMOS Applications”. The SGOI formed using the thermal mixing technique (FIG. 1C ) in conjunction with the implantation step described here will have a lower stacking fault density than if no implantation was performed. Note that oxide layer 24 is formed atoplayer 20 during the heating step. Oxide layer 24 is typically, but not always, removed from the structure after the heating step using a conventional wet etch process wherein a chemical etchant such as HF that has a high selectivity for removing oxide as compared to SiGe is employed. Ifsubstrate 10 is not part of a SOI substrate, the heating step relaxes theSiGe layer 14 while suppressing planar defect generation. - Note that when the oxide layer is removed, a single crystal Si-containing layer (not shown) can be formed atop
layer 20 and the above processing steps of the present invention may be repeated any number of times to produce a multilayered relaxed SiGe substrate material. - The oxide layer 24 formed after the heating step of the present invention has a variable thickness which may range from about 10 to about 1000 nm, with a thickness from about 20 to about 500 nm being more typical.
- Specifically, the heating step of the present invention is an annealing step that is performed at a high temperature from about 900° C. to about 1350° C., with a temperature from about 1200° C. to about 1335° C. being more highly preferred when the
substrate 10 is part of a SOI substrate. Moreover, the heating step of the present invention is carried out in an oxidizing ambient which includes at least one oxygen-containing gas such as O2, NO, N2O, ozone, air and other like oxygen-containing gases. The oxygen-containing gas may be admixed with each other (such as an admixture of O2 and NO), or the gas may be diluted with an inert gas such as He, Ar, N2, Xe, Kr, or Ne. A preferred temperature range from 800° C. to about 1050° C. is used in the present invention when thesubstrate 10 is a non-SOI substrate to prevent Ge loss into thesubstrate 10 during the anneal. An oxidizing or non-oxidizing ambient can be used during the annealing step whensubstrate 10 is a non-SOI substrate. - The heating step may be carried out for a variable period of time that typically ranges from about 10 to about 1800 minutes, with a time period from about 60 to about 600 minutes being more highly preferred. The heating step may be carried out at a single targeted temperature, or various ramp and soak cycles using various ramp rates and soak times can be employed.
- When a SOI substrate is used, the heating step is performed under an oxidizing ambient to achieve the presence of a surface oxide layer, i.e., layer 24, which acts as a diffusion barrier to Ge atoms. Therefore, once the oxide layer 24 is formed on the surface of the structure, Ge becomes trapped between
barrier layer 22 and oxide layer 24. As the surface oxide increases in thickness, the Ge becomes more uniformly distributed throughoutlayers - It is also contemplated herein to use a tailored heat cycle that is based upon the melting point of the SiGe layer. In such an instance, the temperature is adjusted to tract below the melting point of the SiGe layer.
- Note that if the oxidation occurs too rapidly, Ge cannot diffuse away from the surface oxide/SiGe interface fast enough and is either transported through the oxide (and lost) or the interfacial concentration of Ge becomes so high that the alloy melting temperature will be reached.
- When a SOI substrate is used, the role of the high-temperature heating step of the present invention is (1) to form a
barrier layer 22 that is resistant to Ge diffusion in the Si-containing substrate, (2) to allow Ge atoms to diffuse more quickly thereby maintaining a homogeneous distribution during annealing, and (3) to subject the initial layered structure to a thermal budget which will facilitate an equilibrium configuration. The heating step can also increase the degree of relaxation of the initial strained Ge-containinglayer 14. After this heating step has been performed, the structure includes a uniform and substantially relaxed SiGe alloy layer, i.e.,layer 20, sandwiched between thebarrier layer 22 and surface oxide layer 24. - It is noted that the ions implanted previously into the structure facilitate the relaxation of the strained Ge-containing
layer 14, while effectively suppressing planar defects such as stacking faults and microtwins from forming during the thermal mixing process. The mechanism for this phenomenon has not been extensively studied by the applicants. - In accordance with the present invention, the substantially relaxed
SiGe alloy layer 20 has a thickness of about 2000 nm or less, with a thickness from about 10 to about 100 nm being more highly preferred. Thebarrier layer 22 formed during the annealing step of the present invention has a thickness of about 500 nm or less, with a thickness from about 50 to about 200 nm being more highly preferred. Note that the substantially relaxedSiGe alloy layer 20 formed in the present invention has a defect density including misfits and TDs, of less than about 5×107 defects/cm2. This defect density value approaches those reported for contemporary SGOI materials. - More importantly, the
SiGe alloy layer 20 of the present invention has a reduced planar defect density than that achieved using prior art methods. Specifically, theSiGe alloy layer 20 has a planar defect density that is less than 5000 planar defects/cm2, with a planar defect density of less than 100 planar defects/cm2 being more typical. The planar defects, particularly the stacking faults, can be measured using the etching technique described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/654,231, which application was previously incorporated herein in its entirety. Note that when the defect etching technique described in the '231 application is employed, a strained Si layer, to be subsequently described herein, is formed atop the relaxedSiGe alloy layer 20 prior to etching. - The substantially relaxed
SiGe alloy layer 20 formed in the present invention has a final Ge content of from about 0.1 to about 99.9 atomic percent, with an atomic percent of Ge of from about 10 to about 35 being more highly preferred. Another characteristic feature of the substantiallyrelaxed SiGe layer 20 is that it has a measured lattice relaxation of from about 1 to about 100%, with a measured lattice relaxation of from about 50 to about 80% being more highly preferred. - As stated above, the surface oxide layer 24 may be stripped at this point of the present invention so as to provide the SiGe-on-insulator substrate material shown, for example, in
FIG. 1D (note that the substrate material does not include the cap layer since that layer has been used in forming the relaxed SiGe layer). -
FIG. 1E show the structure that is obtained after forming a Si-containinglayer 26 atop theSiGe layer 20. Si-containinglayer 26 is formed using a conventional epitaxial deposition process well known in the art. The thickness of the Si-containinglayer 26 may vary, but typically, the Si-containinglayer 26 has a thickness from about 1 to about 100 nm, with a thickness from about 1 to about 30 nm being more highly preferred. The Si-containinglayer 26 may include: epitaxial silicon (epi-Si), epitaxial silicon-germanium (epi-SiGe), amorphous silicon (a:Si), amorphous silicon-germanium (a: SiGe), single or polycrystalline Si or any combination thereof including multilayers. - In some instances, additional SiGe can be formed atop the substantially
relaxed SiGe layer 20 utilizing the above mentioned processing steps, and thereafter the Si-containinglayer 26 may be formed. Becauselayer 20 has a large in-plane lattice parameter as compared tolayer 26, Si-containinglayer 26 will be strained in a tensile manner. - As stated above, the present invention also contemplates superlattice structures as well as lattice mismatched structures which include at least the SiGe-on-insulator substrate material of the present invention. In the case of superlattice structures, such structures would include at least the substantially relaxed SiGe-on-insulator substrate material of the present invention, and alternating layers Si and SiGe formed atop the substantially relaxed SiGe layer of the substrate material.
- In the case of lattice mismatched structures, GaAs, GaP or other like compound would be formed atop the substantially relaxed SiGe layer of the inventive SiGe-on-insulator substrate material.
- Reference is made to
FIG. 2 , which is a plot of the measured planar defect density vs. O implantation dose for an O energy of 80 and 169 keV. In this example, the initially formed SiGe layer was a 1000 Å-17% pseudomorphic SiGe layer on an SOI substrate. The thermal processing step was a 1250° C. step to form a uniform 800 Å-21% (80 keV) and a 750 Å-23% (169 keV) relaxed SiGe-on-insulator substrate material which was then capped with a 180 Å strained Si layer. The defects were measured using the chemical defect etching described in the '231 application mentioned supra. The data points inFIG. 2 represent the stacking fault densities measured using an optical microscope after etching the Si/SGOI layers in a dilute Secco solution according to the method described in the '231 application. The critical dose for 80 keV oxygen is about 4E14 O/cm2 whereas for 169 keV oxygen it is about 7E14 O/cm2. This corresponds to a threshold energy value (described above) atinterface 12 of 11.2E15 and 9.8E15 (eV/Å)(cm−2) for the 80 and 169 keV data, respectively. -
FIGS. 3A and 3B show an example of using H2 + ions to suppress SF defects. In this example, the initially formed SiGe layer was a 1000 Å-17% pseudomorphic SiGe layer on an SOI substrate. 19 keV H2 + ions were implanted into the structure at a dose of 1.3E16H2/cm2. The thermal processing step was a 1250° C. step to form a uniform 800 Å-21%. The surface oxide was removed and a 180 Å Si layer was grown in order to defect etch the samples according to the '231 application.FIG. 3A shows the optical micrograph of the etched control sample (no implant) andFIG. 3B shows the optical micrograph of the sample which received the H implant before annealing. The critical dose of about 2.5E16H/cm2 for 9.5 keV H was simulated to give a threshold energy value at theinterface 12 of 10.7E15 (eV/Å)(cm2) using SRIM. - While the present invention has been particularly shown and described with respect to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the foregoing and other changes in forms and details may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. It is therefore intended that the present invention not be limited to the exact forms and details described and illustrated, but fall within the scope of the appended claims.
Claims (30)
Priority Applications (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/890,765 US20060011906A1 (en) | 2004-07-14 | 2004-07-14 | Ion implantation for suppression of defects in annealed SiGe layers |
TW094122582A TWI357097B (en) | 2004-07-14 | 2005-07-04 | Ion implantation for suppression of defects in ann |
CNB2005100832812A CN100397571C (en) | 2004-07-14 | 2005-07-08 | Method for manufacturing underlaying material and semiconductor underlaying material |
JP2005204182A JP2006032962A (en) | 2004-07-14 | 2005-07-13 | METHOD OF FORMING RELAXED SiGe LAYER |
US12/539,248 US8053759B2 (en) | 2004-07-14 | 2009-08-11 | Ion implantation for suppression of defects in annealed SiGe layers |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/890,765 US20060011906A1 (en) | 2004-07-14 | 2004-07-14 | Ion implantation for suppression of defects in annealed SiGe layers |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/539,248 Division US8053759B2 (en) | 2004-07-14 | 2009-08-11 | Ion implantation for suppression of defects in annealed SiGe layers |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20060011906A1 true US20060011906A1 (en) | 2006-01-19 |
Family
ID=35598530
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/890,765 Abandoned US20060011906A1 (en) | 2004-07-14 | 2004-07-14 | Ion implantation for suppression of defects in annealed SiGe layers |
US12/539,248 Expired - Fee Related US8053759B2 (en) | 2004-07-14 | 2009-08-11 | Ion implantation for suppression of defects in annealed SiGe layers |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/539,248 Expired - Fee Related US8053759B2 (en) | 2004-07-14 | 2009-08-11 | Ion implantation for suppression of defects in annealed SiGe layers |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US20060011906A1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2006032962A (en) |
CN (1) | CN100397571C (en) |
TW (1) | TWI357097B (en) |
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060081836A1 (en) * | 2004-10-14 | 2006-04-20 | Yoshinobu Kimura | Semiconductor device and method of manufacturing the same |
US20080050883A1 (en) * | 2006-08-25 | 2008-02-28 | Atmel Corporation | Hetrojunction bipolar transistor (hbt) with periodic multilayer base |
US20080099754A1 (en) * | 2006-10-31 | 2008-05-01 | Atmel Corporation | Method for providing a nanoscale, high electron mobility transistor (hemt) on insulator |
US20080138967A1 (en) * | 2006-12-08 | 2008-06-12 | Shijian Li | Plasma immersed ion implantation process |
US20080153271A1 (en) * | 2006-12-18 | 2008-06-26 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Safe handling of low energy, high dose arsenic, phosphorus, and boron implanted wafers |
US7524740B1 (en) | 2008-04-24 | 2009-04-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Localized strain relaxation for strained Si directly on insulator |
US8530934B2 (en) | 2005-11-07 | 2013-09-10 | Atmel Corporation | Integrated circuit structures containing a strain-compensated compound semiconductor layer and methods and systems related thereto |
WO2015163875A1 (en) * | 2014-04-24 | 2015-10-29 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Engineering the optical properties of an integrated computational element by ion implantation |
US20170323973A1 (en) * | 2010-08-27 | 2017-11-09 | Acorn Technologies, Inc. | Soi wafers and devices with buried stressor |
US10833194B2 (en) | 2010-08-27 | 2020-11-10 | Acorn Semi, Llc | SOI wafers and devices with buried stressor |
Families Citing this family (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2896255B1 (en) * | 2006-01-17 | 2008-05-09 | Soitec Silicon On Insulator | METHOD OF ADJUSTING THE STRESS OF A SUBSTRATE IN A SEMICONDUCTOR MATERIAL |
CN101958270B (en) * | 2010-07-09 | 2012-09-26 | 中国科学院上海微系统与信息技术研究所 | Method for preparing ultrathin strain material-on-insulator |
CN102201364A (en) * | 2011-05-26 | 2011-09-28 | 北京大学 | Method for preparing germanium-on-insulator (GeOI) substrate |
JP2014216555A (en) * | 2013-04-26 | 2014-11-17 | 株式会社豊田自動織機 | Method for manufacturing semiconductor substrate |
US9876110B2 (en) * | 2014-01-31 | 2018-01-23 | Stmicroelectronics, Inc. | High dose implantation for ultrathin semiconductor-on-insulator substrates |
US20170179127A1 (en) * | 2015-12-18 | 2017-06-22 | Globalfoundries Inc. | Semiconductor structure having silicon germanium fins and method of fabricating same |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020185686A1 (en) * | 2001-06-12 | 2002-12-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Relaxed SiGe layers on Si or silicon-on-insulator substrates by ion implantation and thermal annealing |
US20050054175A1 (en) * | 2003-07-23 | 2005-03-10 | Matthias Bauer | Deposition of silicon germanium on silicon-on-insulator structures and bulk substrates |
US20050151134A1 (en) * | 2003-01-15 | 2005-07-14 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | Method for isolating silicon germanium dislocation regions in strained-silicon CMOS applications |
Family Cites Families (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP4047098B2 (en) * | 1994-09-13 | 2008-02-13 | 株式会社東芝 | Semiconductor device and manufacturing method thereof |
US6350993B1 (en) * | 1999-03-12 | 2002-02-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | High speed composite p-channel Si/SiGe heterostructure for field effect devices |
CN1331240C (en) * | 1999-03-12 | 2007-08-08 | 国际商业机器公司 | High speed ge channel heterostructures for field effect devices |
US20020167048A1 (en) * | 2001-05-14 | 2002-11-14 | Tweet Douglas J. | Enhanced mobility NMOS and PMOS transistors using strained Si/SiGe layers on silicon-on-insulator substrates |
JP2003128494A (en) * | 2001-10-22 | 2003-05-08 | Sharp Corp | Method for producing semiconductor device and semiconductor device |
JP2003151987A (en) * | 2001-11-19 | 2003-05-23 | Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd | Semiconductor substrate and manufacturing method thereof |
JP2003347399A (en) * | 2002-05-23 | 2003-12-05 | Sharp Corp | Method of manufacturing semiconductor substrate |
US6703293B2 (en) * | 2002-07-11 | 2004-03-09 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | Implantation at elevated temperatures for amorphization re-crystallization of Si1-xGex films on silicon substrates |
US6841457B2 (en) * | 2002-07-16 | 2005-01-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Use of hydrogen implantation to improve material properties of silicon-germanium-on-insulator material made by thermal diffusion |
JP4289864B2 (en) * | 2002-10-22 | 2009-07-01 | シャープ株式会社 | Semiconductor device and semiconductor device manufacturing method |
JP4856350B2 (en) * | 2002-12-16 | 2012-01-18 | Hoya株式会社 | diode |
-
2004
- 2004-07-14 US US10/890,765 patent/US20060011906A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2005
- 2005-07-04 TW TW094122582A patent/TWI357097B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2005-07-08 CN CNB2005100832812A patent/CN100397571C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-07-13 JP JP2005204182A patent/JP2006032962A/en active Pending
-
2009
- 2009-08-11 US US12/539,248 patent/US8053759B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020185686A1 (en) * | 2001-06-12 | 2002-12-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Relaxed SiGe layers on Si or silicon-on-insulator substrates by ion implantation and thermal annealing |
US20050151134A1 (en) * | 2003-01-15 | 2005-07-14 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | Method for isolating silicon germanium dislocation regions in strained-silicon CMOS applications |
US20050054175A1 (en) * | 2003-07-23 | 2005-03-10 | Matthias Bauer | Deposition of silicon germanium on silicon-on-insulator structures and bulk substrates |
Cited By (22)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060081836A1 (en) * | 2004-10-14 | 2006-04-20 | Yoshinobu Kimura | Semiconductor device and method of manufacturing the same |
US9012308B2 (en) | 2005-11-07 | 2015-04-21 | Atmel Corporation | Integrated circuit structures containing a strain-compensated compound semiconductor layer and methods and systems related thereto |
US8530934B2 (en) | 2005-11-07 | 2013-09-10 | Atmel Corporation | Integrated circuit structures containing a strain-compensated compound semiconductor layer and methods and systems related thereto |
US20080050883A1 (en) * | 2006-08-25 | 2008-02-28 | Atmel Corporation | Hetrojunction bipolar transistor (hbt) with periodic multilayer base |
US20080099754A1 (en) * | 2006-10-31 | 2008-05-01 | Atmel Corporation | Method for providing a nanoscale, high electron mobility transistor (hemt) on insulator |
WO2008054967A2 (en) * | 2006-10-31 | 2008-05-08 | Atmel Corporation | Method for providing a nanoscale, high electron mobility transistor (hemt) on insulator |
WO2008054967A3 (en) * | 2006-10-31 | 2008-08-14 | Atmel Corp | Method for providing a nanoscale, high electron mobility transistor (hemt) on insulator |
US8173526B2 (en) | 2006-10-31 | 2012-05-08 | Atmel Corporation | Method for providing a nanoscale, high electron mobility transistor (HEMT) on insulator |
US7550758B2 (en) | 2006-10-31 | 2009-06-23 | Atmel Corporation | Method for providing a nanoscale, high electron mobility transistor (HEMT) on insulator |
US7838399B2 (en) | 2006-12-08 | 2010-11-23 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Plasma immersed ion implantation process using balanced etch-deposition process |
US8273624B2 (en) | 2006-12-08 | 2012-09-25 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Plasma immersed ion implantation process using balanced etch-deposition process |
US20080138967A1 (en) * | 2006-12-08 | 2008-06-12 | Shijian Li | Plasma immersed ion implantation process |
US20100173484A1 (en) * | 2006-12-18 | 2010-07-08 | Foad Majeed A | Safe handling of low energy, high dose arsenic, phosphorus, and boron implanted wafers |
US20080153271A1 (en) * | 2006-12-18 | 2008-06-26 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Safe handling of low energy, high dose arsenic, phosphorus, and boron implanted wafers |
US8927400B2 (en) | 2006-12-18 | 2015-01-06 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Safe handling of low energy, high dose arsenic, phosphorus, and boron implanted wafers |
US7524740B1 (en) | 2008-04-24 | 2009-04-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Localized strain relaxation for strained Si directly on insulator |
US20170323973A1 (en) * | 2010-08-27 | 2017-11-09 | Acorn Technologies, Inc. | Soi wafers and devices with buried stressor |
US10833194B2 (en) | 2010-08-27 | 2020-11-10 | Acorn Semi, Llc | SOI wafers and devices with buried stressor |
US11322615B2 (en) | 2010-08-27 | 2022-05-03 | Acorn Semi, Llc | SOI wafers and devices with buried stressor |
US11791411B2 (en) | 2010-08-27 | 2023-10-17 | Acorn Semi, Llc | Relating to SOI wafers and devices with buried stressors |
WO2015163875A1 (en) * | 2014-04-24 | 2015-10-29 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Engineering the optical properties of an integrated computational element by ion implantation |
US9905425B2 (en) | 2014-04-24 | 2018-02-27 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Engineering the optical properties of an integrated computational element by ion implantation |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
TW200618077A (en) | 2006-06-01 |
US8053759B2 (en) | 2011-11-08 |
CN1722365A (en) | 2006-01-18 |
TWI357097B (en) | 2012-01-21 |
US20100032684A1 (en) | 2010-02-11 |
CN100397571C (en) | 2008-06-25 |
JP2006032962A (en) | 2006-02-02 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8053759B2 (en) | Ion implantation for suppression of defects in annealed SiGe layers | |
US6855436B2 (en) | Formation of silicon-germanium-on-insulator (SGOI) by an integral high temperature SIMOX-Ge interdiffusion anneal | |
JP4582487B2 (en) | SiGe on insulator substrate material | |
US7679141B2 (en) | High-quality SGOI by annealing near the alloy melting point | |
US7067400B2 (en) | Method for preventing sidewall consumption during oxidation of SGOI islands | |
US7358166B2 (en) | Relaxed, low-defect SGOI for strained Si CMOS applications | |
US20060057403A1 (en) | Use of thin SOI to inhibit relaxation of SiGe layers | |
JP4452132B2 (en) | Defect reduction by oxidation of silicon | |
US20060042542A1 (en) | Method of producing silicon-germanium-on-insulator material using unstrained Ge-containing source layers | |
Buca et al. | Si+ ion implantation for strain relaxation of pseudomorphic Si1− xGex/Si (100) heterostructures | |
Regula et al. | Rare Gas Ion Implanted‐Silicon Template for the Growth of Relaxed Si1− xGex/Si (100) |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, NEW Y Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BEDELL, STEPHEN W.;CHEN, HUAJIE;FOGEL, KEITH E.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:015219/0925;SIGNING DATES FROM 20040720 TO 20040820 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S. 2 LLC, NEW YORK Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:036550/0001 Effective date: 20150629 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GLOBALFOUNDRIES INC., CAYMAN ISLANDS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S. 2 LLC;GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S. INC.;REEL/FRAME:036779/0001 Effective date: 20150910 |