Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

EP2586959B1 - Safety device, closing device and evaluation unit - Google Patents

Safety device, closing device and evaluation unit Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2586959B1
EP2586959B1 EP11008656.8A EP11008656A EP2586959B1 EP 2586959 B1 EP2586959 B1 EP 2586959B1 EP 11008656 A EP11008656 A EP 11008656A EP 2586959 B1 EP2586959 B1 EP 2586959B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
movement
sensors
evaluation unit
safety device
signal
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP11008656.8A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2586959B2 (en
EP2586959A1 (en
Inventor
Freedman Steven
Tobias Leutenegger Dr.
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Cedes AG
Original Assignee
Cedes AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=45065575&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP2586959(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Cedes AG filed Critical Cedes AG
Priority to US13/284,005 priority Critical patent/US8988213B2/en
Priority to DK11008656.8T priority patent/DK2586959T4/en
Priority to EP11008656.8A priority patent/EP2586959B2/en
Priority to CN201210548388.XA priority patent/CN103089109B/en
Publication of EP2586959A1 publication Critical patent/EP2586959A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2586959B1 publication Critical patent/EP2586959B1/en
Publication of EP2586959B2 publication Critical patent/EP2586959B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E06DOORS, WINDOWS, SHUTTERS, OR ROLLER BLINDS IN GENERAL; LADDERS
    • E06BFIXED OR MOVABLE CLOSURES FOR OPENINGS IN BUILDINGS, VEHICLES, FENCES OR LIKE ENCLOSURES IN GENERAL, e.g. DOORS, WINDOWS, BLINDS, GATES
    • E06B9/00Screening or protective devices for wall or similar openings, with or without operating or securing mechanisms; Closures of similar construction
    • E06B9/56Operating, guiding or securing devices or arrangements for roll-type closures; Spring drums; Tape drums; Counterweighting arrangements therefor
    • E06B9/80Safety measures against dropping or unauthorised opening; Braking or immobilising devices; Devices for limiting unrolling
    • E06B9/82Safety measures against dropping or unauthorised opening; Braking or immobilising devices; Devices for limiting unrolling automatic
    • E06B9/88Safety measures against dropping or unauthorised opening; Braking or immobilising devices; Devices for limiting unrolling automatic for limiting unrolling
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E05LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
    • E05FDEVICES FOR MOVING WINGS INTO OPEN OR CLOSED POSITION; CHECKS FOR WINGS; WING FITTINGS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, CONCERNED WITH THE FUNCTIONING OF THE WING
    • E05F15/00Power-operated mechanisms for wings
    • E05F15/40Safety devices, e.g. detection of obstructions or end positions
    • E05F15/42Detection using safety edges
    • E05F15/43Detection using safety edges responsive to disruption of energy beams, e.g. light or sound
    • E05F2015/434Detection using safety edges responsive to disruption of energy beams, e.g. light or sound with cameras or optical sensors
    • E05F2015/435Detection using safety edges responsive to disruption of energy beams, e.g. light or sound with cameras or optical sensors by interruption of the beam
    • E05F2015/436Detection using safety edges responsive to disruption of energy beams, e.g. light or sound with cameras or optical sensors by interruption of the beam the beam being parallel to the wing edge
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E05LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
    • E05YINDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBCLASSES E05D AND E05F, RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, ELECTRIC CONTROL, POWER SUPPLY, POWER SIGNAL OR TRANSMISSION, USER INTERFACES, MOUNTING OR COUPLING, DETAILS, ACCESSORIES, AUXILIARY OPERATIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, APPLICATION THEREOF
    • E05Y2900/00Application of doors, windows, wings or fittings thereof
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E05LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
    • E05YINDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBCLASSES E05D AND E05F, RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, ELECTRIC CONTROL, POWER SUPPLY, POWER SIGNAL OR TRANSMISSION, USER INTERFACES, MOUNTING OR COUPLING, DETAILS, ACCESSORIES, AUXILIARY OPERATIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, APPLICATION THEREOF
    • E05Y2900/00Application of doors, windows, wings or fittings thereof
    • E05Y2900/10Application of doors, windows, wings or fittings thereof for buildings or parts thereof
    • E05Y2900/106Application of doors, windows, wings or fittings thereof for buildings or parts thereof for garages
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E06DOORS, WINDOWS, SHUTTERS, OR ROLLER BLINDS IN GENERAL; LADDERS
    • E06BFIXED OR MOVABLE CLOSURES FOR OPENINGS IN BUILDINGS, VEHICLES, FENCES OR LIKE ENCLOSURES IN GENERAL, e.g. DOORS, WINDOWS, BLINDS, GATES
    • E06B9/00Screening or protective devices for wall or similar openings, with or without operating or securing mechanisms; Closures of similar construction
    • E06B9/56Operating, guiding or securing devices or arrangements for roll-type closures; Spring drums; Tape drums; Counterweighting arrangements therefor
    • E06B9/68Operating devices or mechanisms, e.g. with electric drive
    • E06B2009/6809Control
    • E06B2009/6818Control using sensors
    • E06B2009/6827Control using sensors sensing light
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E06DOORS, WINDOWS, SHUTTERS, OR ROLLER BLINDS IN GENERAL; LADDERS
    • E06BFIXED OR MOVABLE CLOSURES FOR OPENINGS IN BUILDINGS, VEHICLES, FENCES OR LIKE ENCLOSURES IN GENERAL, e.g. DOORS, WINDOWS, BLINDS, GATES
    • E06B9/00Screening or protective devices for wall or similar openings, with or without operating or securing mechanisms; Closures of similar construction
    • E06B9/56Operating, guiding or securing devices or arrangements for roll-type closures; Spring drums; Tape drums; Counterweighting arrangements therefor
    • E06B9/68Operating devices or mechanisms, e.g. with electric drive
    • E06B2009/6809Control
    • E06B2009/6818Control using sensors
    • E06B2009/6836Control using sensors sensing obstacle

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a safety device for securing a movable, guided movement element against unwanted collisions according to the preamble of claim 1 and a locking device according to the preamble of claim 14 and an evaluation unit according to the preamble of claim 15.
  • an electronic unit determines from the Zeizdifferenz from the first to the second light barrier by triggering these light barriers a time at which a subsequent, third light barrier would be detected, and switches in good time before this event occurs, the third light barrier in the measurement state.
  • the object of the invention is to propose a safety device or a locking device, which allows in an improved manner to detect a risk of collision during movement of the moving element.
  • the securing device according to the invention for securing a movable, guided movement element against unwanted collisions with an object lying on a movement path of the movement element comprises at least two sensors. for detecting the object or the movement element and for outputting signals as a function of the detection. Furthermore, the security device according to the invention comprises an evaluation unit for evaluating signals from the sensors and for generating a shutdown signal based on the evaluation.
  • Goals or doors, foil doors, swing gates, roller doors, telescope doors or the like come into consideration as a movement element. If necessary, parts of a closing device that are moved during the movement of the moving element may also belong to the moving element.
  • the securing device serves to avoid unwanted collisions during the movement of the moving element. If the movement element, such as a gate, closed, it may happen, for example, that a person, an object or any other object enters the range of motion of the movement element. Without any securing device, the object could in principle be grasped or clamped by the movement element in such a case. Such accidents should be avoided.
  • the evaluation unit of the safety device detects signals from the sensors and evaluates them, for example by a corresponding electronics. This detection can be carried out in the simplest way, that the evaluation unit is connected to the respective outputs of the sensors or wired.
  • the sensors basically serve to detect an object, that is one Object or a person who enters the movement space of the movement element.
  • the movement space is the space which is either passed directly by the movement element during the movement of the movement element, or an area which lies in the immediate vicinity of this zone passed by the movement element and thus to a certain extent constitutes a danger zone. An object which is thus located in this danger area may possibly cause a collision with the movement element, for example because of its spatial extent.
  • this movement space or at least part of this movement space is monitored by the securing device or the sensors, so that the risk of a collision can be reduced or even eliminated altogether.
  • the sensors are also arranged or designed so that the Bewegunselement can be detected.
  • the sensors may, for example, be mounted in the guide rail, in which the corresponding movement element is guided and moved. It is also conceivable that the light barriers are arranged laterally offset from the guide rail, e.g. arranged parallel to the guide rail.
  • the movement element is designed or arranged such that it is detected by the sensors during its guided movement, for example by the movement element penetrating into the detection area of the sensor. Among other things, this z. B. be used to determine the position of the moving element or a portion of thefroselemenzes by the sensors.
  • the sensors are further configured to output signals that, among other things, carry at least the information as to whether the sensor detects an object, a person or the like or not.
  • the signal can accordingly carry the information as to whether the light barrier is interrupted or not.
  • the corresponding signals are transferred to the evaluation unit or detected by the latter.
  • the securing device according to the invention offers a particularly advantageous measure, characterized in that, as soon as the sensor detects something, it can be distinguished whether it is an object and if there is a risk of collision or if it is the moving element itself, which in its movement from the sensor was recorded.
  • the invention makes use of the insight that the distinction between the movement element and the object that could cause a collision can be found by the stationary analysis of the signal state even without a consideration of a time course.
  • those signal images which correspond to the detection of an object can be defined in advance. The determination as to whether an object is detected is then made by comparison with the defined signal images.
  • the security device is characterized in that the evaluation unit is designed to detect from the at least two sensors a currently detected state vector from a set of state vectors, which unambiguously comprise all possible combinations of the signals of the sensors, and in the case of predetermined state vectors, the shutdown signal to generate.
  • a state vector in the sense of the invention comprises individual information or information contents of the signals of the sensors.
  • the state vector is designed such that this information or information contents can be assigned to the individual sensors.
  • the information or information contents may in particular include the information as to whether the sensor detects something (an object / a person or the movement element) or not.
  • the entirety of the signals of all outputs of the sensors can be viewed.
  • the information consists of a digital signal, ie 0 or 1; If, for example, a voltage is present at the output of the sensor, something is detected by the sensor and vice versa.
  • the state vector can be designed in various ways. It is conceivable on the one hand that a memory unit, e.g. a register bank, is provided, wherein each register a corresponding sensor can be assigned. It is also conceivable that only electrical lines are available, each of which can be assigned to a sensor.
  • the information both about the detection of the sensor and about which sensor it is, can also be encoded in some other way, for example by a numerical code, by assigning different numerical values to certain sensors with specific states. On the assignment, which sensor has supplied which signal or which information, it is then also known where the sensor is arranged or which position it has.
  • the evaluation unit detects the state vector, i.
  • the outputs of the sensors are connected to the evaluation unit.
  • the set of all possible state vectors thus unambiguously includes all possible combinations of the signals of the sensors. In particular, it can be clearly identified or deduced from the state vector which sensor detects something or not.
  • the state vectors can be repeated, for example, periodically, but in principle also continuously detected.
  • the currently detected state vector is the state vector that is used to determine whether or not there is a danger of collision right now or in some current time span.
  • the safety device comprises sensors which can detect both the movement element and an object.
  • the evaluation unit only evaluates the information from the state vector whether an object has been detected by a sensor or not and which sensor it is in each case.
  • Each individual piece of information of a single sensor in itself contains only the information, whether in principle of the respective sensor something is detected or not.
  • This single information does not yet permit the conclusion as to whether the detected object is the moving element or an object that could cause a collision. But this conclusion can be drawn from the totality of this information of all signals.
  • the movement element for example, during its movement successively cover one sensor after another and thus be detected by these sensors each. During the movement of the movement element, therefore, a characteristic "pattern" is generated which sensors detect something and which are not.
  • the evaluation unit If the signals of the sensors deviate from these possible patterns, an object has regularly entered the movement space and there is a danger of collision; then the evaluation unit generates a shutdown signal. Accordingly, all state vectors are known in principle, which mean that either nothing is detected or the motion element is detected or an object with the risk of collision is detected. Consequently, the shutdown signal is generated at the corresponding predetermined state vectors.
  • the signals of the sensors can be evaluated, for example, by a logic circuit or by a multiplexer, in particular if digital signals are available as signals.
  • the decision as to whether a shutdown signal is generated, that is, whether a predetermined state vector is present, can be made by either addressing certain fixed output lines of the logic circuit or of the multiplexer.
  • the predetermined state vectors are ready for comparison.
  • the state vectors can also be present as numerical values which are buffer-stored in a register, wherein the predetermined state vectors are stored in a further memory and then a comparison is made.
  • a digital comparison by logical switching elements.
  • the securing device according to the invention is advantageously used not only in the dynamic case, ie during the movement of the moving element, but also in the static case, when, for example, the gate is turned on again, the gate fully extended., Completely retracted or in an intermediate state can be located.
  • the security device is in particular hardly prone to errors and allows a particularly high level of security, since the actual sensor status is always checked in detail. In addition, sensors do not have to be activated or deactivated.
  • the securing device according to the invention also has the advantage that virtually no structural changes have to be made to a corresponding closing device on a gate, etc., e.g. in the sense of attaching special reflection flags. It therefore allows a particularly good retrofitting.
  • a detected state vector may also be stored at least temporarily to be used for later comparison with the current state vector. It is conceivable caching in a register, other use of flip-flop circuits or the like. This measure is also advantageous if, for example, there is a state vector during the movement of the movement element and therefore it is known which state vector should be present next. By this measure, therefore, the safety and reliability of the device can be increased again. If necessary, for example, in the case of a gate in which a so-called "blowout" is possible (for example in the case of the film gate), a distinction can be made even more reliably between a blowout case and a danger of collision by an object.
  • the time during the movement of the moving element can be recorded by a timer. Based on this information can be closed, for example, which state vector should be present. It is also conceivable, on the basis of this time, to select individual predetermined state vectors which can be used for a comparison or for the decision as to whether the shutdown signal is generated.
  • safety can be increased, for example in the case of a telescopic door, since in such a door gate elements can swing out after a certain time and can no longer be detected by the sensors.
  • this case can also be used for a blowout detection, since in the case of a "blowout" the movement element is partially out of the guide and, for example, is no longer detected at this point.
  • the evaluation unit is designed to assign each state vector unambiguously exactly one state information from a predetermined target quantity via a bijective mapping from a set of state vectors which comprise the signals of the respective sensors individually as a function of their position, and in the case predetermined state information to generate the shutdown signal.
  • the evaluation unit uniquely assigns exactly one state information to each state vector.
  • the state information may be, for example, a specific signal. It can be e.g. to act as an electrical or optical signal.
  • the state information can also consist of a numerical value.
  • the target set consists of all possible or possible state information that can be assigned to the state vectors. Any state information is an element of the target set.
  • the target set does not include any elements that can not be assigned to a state vector. Accordingly, the set of state vectors can again have as many elements as there are conceivable states of the sensors.
  • a fuse device includes n photoelectric sensors (n: natural number, n> 0), each as signals 0 or 1 (not interrupted or interrupted) output, the set of all possible state vectors comprises 2 n (2 high n) elements. Then, the target amount also includes 2 n (2 high n) elements.
  • This illustration is bijective, meaning that it is both injective and surjective.
  • Injectivity means that no value of the target set is assigned to several elements of the set of state vectors.
  • Surjectivity means that each value of the target quantity is also assigned to an element of the set of state vectors.
  • the evaluation unit comprises a multiplexer which has a plurality of inputs and, depending on which inputs are addressed or signals are received, responds to different outputs or outputs signals via different outputs.
  • the associated inputs of the multiplexer together then correspond to the state vector.
  • a logic circuit which receives the states of the individual sensors via associated signal inputs and logically linked so that only in the case of predefined signal pattern, a corresponding control signal, in particular a shutdown signal is output.
  • State information that can be output is known. Some of them are predetermined in the case of regular operation, others in the event of a breakdown or collision hazard. In regular operation, ie, the moving element is moved without an object penetrates into the movement space during this time or there is some other disturbance, certain predetermined state information occurs. If another status information is output, then there is no regular operation: The movement element is to be stopped.
  • the evaluation unit is designed to assign the sensors in each case a numerical value as a function of their position and their signal and to assemble the state vector from these numerical values.
  • a microcontroller or a processor can be used as an evaluation unit.
  • the corresponding mathematical operation can be carried out by a simple programming of the microcontroller or processor.
  • the signals are used to perform a mathematical operation that results in a single numerical value or result value.
  • the mathematical operation represents a bijective mapping.
  • Each element of the definition set is assigned an element of the target set by the mathematical operation, ie the mapping. All numerical values thus obtained, which are assigned to state vectors by the bijective mapping, together form the target quantity.
  • the result value effectively represents an encoding, which sensor detects something and which does not, it can also be deduced from this information whether the object or the movement element is detected. If only the movement element was detected, then during movement of the Movement element these continue, because in principle no risk of collision is to be feared. However, if exclusively or additionally an object is detected, then in fact this risk of collision is to be feared and the movement of the movement element is to be stopped.
  • an addition may be provided in an embodiment of the invention.
  • Such a mathematical function is usually provided by most commercially available processors / microcontrollers.
  • processors / microcontrollers In addition, such a microcontroller or processor enables rapid signal processing.
  • the predetermined state information can be stored as comparative numbers in a comparison table, which are stored in a memory unit such as a register bank or an EEPROM (electrically erasable programmable read-only memory). Subsequently, the numerical values / result values are compared with the comparative figures. If the result values are one of the comparison values, then e.g. a regular case, otherwise a shutdown signal is generated. It is also conceivable, in principle, to store only comparison values which correspond to a non-regular operation, so that a shutdown signal is generated if they match.
  • the evaluation of the result value can be done not only by specifying a comparison table and performing a numerical comparison, but also by programming another mathematical operation (eg, a mathematical function, logic gates (English: AND, OR, NAND, NOR or combinations thereof) or the like So that, if corresponding result values are available, the movement can be continued or stopped
  • another mathematical operation eg, a mathematical function, logic gates (English: AND, OR, NAND, NOR or combinations thereof) or the like
  • Such electronic components such as microcontrollers, as well as corresponding memory elements and registers can usually be purchased inexpensively Memory requirement for a corresponding comparison table also be so low that the memory or register of a commercial microcontroller for this purpose are quite sufficient. Therefore, a cost-effective production can be made possible.
  • a microcontroller can also be reprogrammed in a simple manner, if, for example, additional sensors are to be retrofitted.
  • the evaluation unit can, for example, perform the assignment of numerical values inter alia as a function of the respective sensor. In a development of the invention, this assignment can in particular be made such that, depending on the position of the individual sensors, fundamentally different numbers are assigned. For example, if there are N sensors in total (where N ⁇ 2 and N is a natural number). The N sensors can be counted individually, for example. The order of counting, for example, done so that after starting the movement of a moving element in the open state of the moving element, the sensors are counted in the order as they are passed by the moving element after each other.
  • the safety of the security device can be increased in particular by additionally assigning to the signals and / or result values a time value which corresponds to the time of detection.
  • the timer may begin to run when the motion element is activated.
  • the timer can then be stopped, even if the movement of the moving element is stopped.
  • the timer keeps track of the amount of time that has already passed during the movement of the moving element.
  • the timer measures the time of movement of the movement element.
  • the evaluation unit determines, based on the time determined by the timer, a desired position of the movement element at which the movement element would have to be in regular operation. This information can for example be compared with the information which photocells are currently interrupted or not. If, for example, a light barrier is interrupted, which still can not have happened at all by the movement element, then the detected object can only be an object, and not the movement element. So there is a risk of collision. It will then generate a shutdown signal.
  • the evaluation unit may be designed to determine, based on the desired position, which sensors should be interrupted and released again as a result of the movement of the movement element, and accordingly calculate a desired value resulting from the signals by means of the mathematical operation would result in the sensors passing during normal operation. Accordingly, in an advantageous development of the invention, the evaluation unit is designed to compare the result value with the desired value. Accordingly, it can be particularly advantageous to design the evaluation unit in such a way that, based on the desired position, it is determined which sensors should have detected the movement element as a result of the movement of the movement element. By means of the mathematical operation, a setpoint value is calculated, which would result from the signals of the light barriers interrupted during normal operation if, for example, photoelectric sensors are present as sensors.
  • the evaluation unit can thus be designed, for example, to carry out a countercheck. Due to the time determined by the timer, which has elapsed during the movement of the movement element, for example, a certain number of light barriers would have already happened and thus be interrupted. Furthermore, therefore, a certain result value would have to exist, a so-called setpoint. This setpoint is compared with the actually determined result value. If the values do not match, then there is no regular operation. If necessary, the movement element must be stopped. It is conceivable, for example, that an object is detected by a light barrier and therefore results in a deviation in the result value from the desired value. In principle, it is therefore also possible to detect whether there is another fault. For example, it could be that the speed of the moving element does not correspond to the speed required during regular operation. Thus, the moving element has passed too few or too many light barriers. Optionally, in this case, a stop of the movement element by a corresponding switch-off signal.
  • a telescopic moving element has at least two elements, which are guided in parallel rails. When fully opened, the elements are perpendicular to the closing plane at the edge of the corresponding opening during the closing process or the movement is at least one element in motion. When the closing operation is completed, the elements are arranged next to each other. For example, move the individual elements so that when the door is open, the sensors are first passed one after the other until about half of the door opening is reached. Subsequently, the detection ends by the sensor first passed, and so one sensor after another is "released" in the same order at times.
  • the sensors can be designed, for example, as light barriers. It is also conceivable, however, to use a time-of-flight (abbreviation: TOF) sensor.
  • TOF time-of-flight
  • a TOF sensor advantageously also enables a distance or position determination of a detected object.
  • the sensors can be arranged in a preferred development of the invention parallel to the direction of movement of the moving element, further in particular so that they lie in the plane of movement of the moving element.
  • the parallel arrangement along the direction of movement allows successively one sensor after another to detect the moving moving element.
  • the arrangement in the plane of motion allows the movement space in which a risk of collision could exist to be monitored as completely as possible.
  • the sensors may further be arranged perpendicular to the direction of movement, e.g. to evenly scrape the movement space.
  • the evaluation unit can also be designed to interrupt the movement of the movement element.
  • a corresponding switching unit, a contactor or a relay or the like may be integrated into the evaluation unit. It is conceivable to integrate the control and / or regulation of the movement element in the evaluation unit to a compact unit as possible.
  • the evaluation unit can therefore also be designed as a control unit for checking, ie for controlling and / or regulating the movement, the moment of movement.
  • the control unit can also be designed to receive a command from a user to close the gate or the To interrupt movement of the gate. Such a command can be issued, for example via a control panel, a remote control, optionally acoustically or in any other way.
  • the evaluation unit can repeatedly detect the state vectors continuously or at intervals, in particular also periodically.
  • a closing device with a movable, guided moving element and a securing device is characterized in that a securing device according to the invention or an embodiment of the invention is used.
  • the movement element is designed as a gate. At least one of the sensors is arranged so that the movement element can be detected by the sensor.
  • the evaluation unit can also be designed as a control unit for checking the movement of the movement element.
  • FIG. 1 shows a closing device 1 with a gate 2, which consists of individual gate elements 2a, 2b and 2c.
  • the gate two or the individual elements 2a, 2b, 2c are guided in guide rails 3.
  • In the guide of the guide rails 3 are light barriers 4a, 4b, 4c, 4d, 4e, wherein the individual optical Pfande are shown as dashed lines.
  • In the drawing are in the left guide rail of the guide 3, the transmitter of the light barriers 4a to 4e and in the right guide rail, the corresponding receiver.
  • the direction of movement when closing the door 2 is shown by an arrow 5.
  • the movement of the gate 2 is carried out by a drive motor M, which in turn is controlled or regulated by a control unit K.
  • the individual receivers of the light barriers 4a to 4e are connected to the control unit K via the corresponding lines 6a, 6b, 6c, 6d, 6e.
  • the output of the control unit K is in turn connected to the motor M, which is controlled or regulated via this output 7.
  • the closing plane in which the door 2 moves between the two guide rails of the guide 3 is identified by the reference numeral 8.
  • a person 9 In this level or in the movement space of the gate 2 is currently in the FIG. 1 a person 9. This person 9 interrupts the photocells 4c, 4d and 4e. The light barriers 4a and 4b are not interrupted.
  • FIG. 2 a corresponding comparison table is shown.
  • the photocell is not interrupted (indicated by the "o" symbol in the "Status” column)
  • the gate is set in motion in the open state, it first interrupts the first, then the second, then the third light barrier etc.
  • Case I (see columns 3 - 4 in FIG. 2 ): There are three light barriers interrupted; In the present case, the value 1 is assigned to the first light barrier, the value 2 to the second light barrier, and the value 4 to the third light barrier. The remaining photocells are each assigned the value 0.
  • the result value (sum) is 7.
  • the value 7 is included because the comparison table contains all the values that can be formed when the series after 1 to a maximum of N light barriers is interrupted / are. The comparison table thus contains the values 1, 3, 7, 15, 31, 63.
  • the result value 7 means that the first three light barriers are interrupted.
  • Case II shows that the photocells 1, 2, 3 and 5 are interrupted. This case II can not correspond to a movement of the gate, because otherwise the gate would have to have an interruption in the area of the fourth light barrier, which would have to allow the light beam of the light barrier to pass. The interruption of the fifth light barrier is therefore carried out an object that can cause a collision and thus the control unit must stop the movement of the door.
  • the result is 23, which is not included in the comparison table. This leads to a corresponding interruption. Since this mapping is advantageously bijective, a corresponding state can be clearly assigned to the result values. The control unit can thus infer whether an interruption is necessary or not.
  • the present embodiment can be further improved by running a timer.
  • FIG. 3 shows an embodiment in which a so-called "blow-out effect” takes place.
  • This may be the case in particular with so-called film doors.
  • Such film doors are guided so that at a corresponding gust of wind or a gust, which could lead to damage to the gate as a result of the large force against the gate, that the gate at the corresponding point at which the force is too large, from the leadership slips out. The force is reduced, and there is no damage to the gate.
  • the present embodiment makes it possible to distinguish whether an object has entered the movement space or whether such a so-called "blow-out effect" took place.
  • the time is tracked by a timer.
  • the first two columns of the table show a case in which the gate has passed the first three light barriers, at time t-1.
  • the value 7 (sum) contained in the comparison table is correctly stated at time t-1. If the result value still has the value 7 at time t, this means that the gate has been stopped.
  • Case II in FIG. 3 : In case II, the gate did not move further after passing the third light barrier, but an object has penetrated that the fifth light barrier passes. If the gate had moved further, the result value 15 would have been expected at time t, as already mentioned in the first case. By interrupting the light barrier 5, however, the value 23 (sum) is now available as a result value. This is greater than the expected result value and therefore means an interruption by an object. The gate must be stopped.
  • Case III indicates a "blow-out” case.
  • the gate has moved and meanwhile the fourth light barrier has happened.
  • the result value is not 15, as would be the case with regular operation, but only 13, since a gust of wind has spoiled the guidance in the area of the second light barrier (so-called "blow-out”).
  • the light barrier 2 is therefore no longer interrupted. In such a case, it may therefore no longer be an interruption of a light barrier by an object at the time t.
  • a light barrier is set in motion again, which has already been interrupted by the gate and thus should basically continue to be interrupted. Therefore If the sum is smaller than the expected result value, namely the desired value 15.
  • the comparison table is therefore designed so that, depending on elapsed time during the movement of the gate thus initially, in the case according to FIG. 2 the comparison table can take the values 0, 1, 3, 7 and 15. Subsequently, however, the comparison table does not assume the value 31 but the value 30, since the first light barrier is opened again. The next value is 60 because the first and second photocells are opened, that is, 63 - 1 - 2. Accordingly, the next value of the comparison table is 120. If these values deviate at the appropriate times, this means that either one object has penetrated, which is the case when the result values are greater than the reference values of the comparison table at the respective times. In principle, if the time information were not available, it could also be a so-called "blow-out case" if the value is smaller than the setpoint value.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Architecture (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Power-Operated Mechanisms For Wings (AREA)
  • Operating, Guiding And Securing Of Roll- Type Closing Members (AREA)
  • Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)

Abstract

The device has radiation barrier sensors detecting an object and a movement element and outputting signals depending on a detection. An evaluation unit evaluates signals of the sensors, and generates a switch-off signal on a basis of the evaluation. The unit acquires currently detected state vector from a set of state vectors, which unambiguously comprise combinations of the signals of the sensors from the sensors, and generates the switch-off signal in a case of predetermined state vectors. The unit determines the state vectors predetermined for generation of the switch-off signal. The sensor is selected from the group consisting of interrupted light barrier sensor, reflected light barrier sensor and time-of-flight sensor. An independent claim is also included for a closing device.

Description

Die Erfindung betrifft eine Sicherungsvorrichtung zur Absicherung eines bewegbaren, geführten Bewegungselementes gegen ungewollte Kollisionen nach dem Oberbegriff des Anspruchs 1 sowie eine Schließvorrichtung nach dem Oberbegriff des Anspruchs 14 sowie eine Auswerteeinheit nach dem Oberbegriff des Anspruchs 15.The invention relates to a safety device for securing a movable, guided movement element against unwanted collisions according to the preamble of claim 1 and a locking device according to the preamble of claim 14 and an evaluation unit according to the preamble of claim 15.

Aus dem Stand der Technik ist beispielsweise aus der EP 1 841 942 B1 eine Vorrichtung zur Absicherung eines angetriebenen Bewegungselements bekannt. Bei dieser Vorrichtung ermittelt eine Elektronikeinheit aus der Zeizdifferenz von der ersten zur zweiten Lichtschranke durch Auslösen dieser Lichtschranken eine Zeit, zu welcher eine nachfolgende, dritte Lichtschranke erfasst werden würde, und schaltet rechtzeitig, bevor dieses Ereignis eintritt, die dritte Lichtschranke in den Messzustand.From the prior art is for example from the EP 1 841 942 B1 a device for securing a driven moving member known. In this device, an electronic unit determines from the Zeizdifferenz from the first to the second light barrier by triggering these light barriers a time at which a subsequent, third light barrier would be detected, and switches in good time before this event occurs, the third light barrier in the measurement state.

Darüber hinaus ist aus der DE 299 01 664 U1 ein Hubtor mit einer Lichtgitter-Überwachungseinrichtung bekannt, bei welcher das sich aus den Ausgangssignalen der Lichtempfänger ergebende Signalmuster vor dem Einführen eines Objektes, mit dem eine Kollisionsgefahr besteht, abgespeichert wird. Sodann wird dieses Signalmuster mit dem Signalmuster nach dem Einführen des Objektes verglicher.In addition, from the DE 299 01 664 U1 a lifting gate with a light grid monitoring device, in which the signal pattern resulting from the output signals of the light receiver is stored prior to the insertion of an object with which there is a danger of collision. Then this signal pattern is compared with the signal pattern after insertion of the object.

Aufgabe der Erfindung ist es, eine Sicherungsvorrichtung bzw. eine Schließvorrichtung vorzuschlagen, welche in verbesserter Weise ermöglicht, eine Kollisionsgefahr bei Bewegung des Bewegungselementes zu erkennen.The object of the invention is to propose a safety device or a locking device, which allows in an improved manner to detect a risk of collision during movement of the moving element.

Die Aufgabe wird, ausgehend von einer Sicherungsvorrichtung bzw. einer schließvorrichtung der eingangs genannten Art, durch die kennzeichnenden Merkmale des Anspruchs 1, des Anspruchs 14 sowie des Anspruchs 15 gelöst.The object is achieved on the basis of a securing device or a closing device of the type mentioned above, by the characterizing features of claim 1, claim 14 and claim 15.

Durch die in den abhängigen Ansprüchen genannten Maßnahmen sind vorteilhafte Ausführungen und Weiterbildung der Erfindung möglich.By the measures mentioned in the dependent claims are advantageous embodiments and development of the invention possible.

Die erfindungsgemäße Sicherungsvorrichtung zur Absicherung eines bewegbaren, geführten Bewegungselementes gegen ungewollte Kollisionen mit einem auf einem Bewegungsweg des Bewegungselementes liegenden Objekt umfasst wenigstens zwei Sensoren. zur Detektion des Objektes bzw. des Bewegungselementes und zur Ausgabe von Signalen in Abhängigkeit von der Detektion. Ferner umfasst die erfindungsgemäße Sicherungsvorrichtung eine Auswerteeinheit zur Auswertung von Signalen der Sensoren und zur Generierung eines Abschaltsignals anhand der Auswertung.The securing device according to the invention for securing a movable, guided movement element against unwanted collisions with an object lying on a movement path of the movement element comprises at least two sensors. for detecting the object or the movement element and for outputting signals as a function of the detection. Furthermore, the security device according to the invention comprises an evaluation unit for evaluating signals from the sensors and for generating a shutdown signal based on the evaluation.

Als Bewegungselement kommen insbesondere Tore oder Türen, Folientore, Schwenktore, Rolltore, Teleskoptore oder dergleichen in Betracht. Zum Bewegungselement können gegebenenfalls auch Teile einer Schließvorrichtung gehören, welche bei der Bewegung des Bewegungselementes mitbewegt werden.Goals or doors, foil doors, swing gates, roller doors, telescope doors or the like come into consideration as a movement element. If necessary, parts of a closing device that are moved during the movement of the moving element may also belong to the moving element.

Grundsätzlich dient die erfindungsgemäße Sicherungsvorrichtung dazu, ungewollte Kollisionen bei der Bewegung des Bewegungselementes zu vermeiden. Wird das Bewegungselement, etwa ein Tor, geschlossen, kann es beispielsweise vorkommen, dass eine Person, ein Gegenstand oder ein sonstiges Objekt in den Bewegungsraum des Bewegungselementes eintritt. Ohne jegliche Sicherungsvorrichtung könnte grundsätzlich in einem solchen Fall das Objekt vom Bewegungselement erfasst bzw. eingeklemmt werden. Derartige Unfälle sollen vermieden werden können.Basically, the securing device according to the invention serves to avoid unwanted collisions during the movement of the moving element. If the movement element, such as a gate, closed, it may happen, for example, that a person, an object or any other object enters the range of motion of the movement element. Without any securing device, the object could in principle be grasped or clamped by the movement element in such a case. Such accidents should be avoided.

Die Auswerteeinheit der erfindungsgemäßen Sicherungsvorrichtung erfasst Signale der Sensoren und wertet diese aus, z.B. durch eine entsprechende Elektronik. Diese Erfassung kann in einfachster Weise dadurch erfolgen, dass die Auswerteeinheit mit den jeweiligen Ausgängen der Sensoren verbunden bzw. verdrahtet ist. Die Sensoren dienen grundsätzlich der Detektion eines Objekts, das heißt eines Gegenstandes oder einer Person, die in den Bewegungsraum des Bewegungselementes eintritt. Bei dem Bewegungsraum handelt es sich um den Raum, der entweder unmittelbar bei der Bewegung des Bewegungselementes vom Bewegungselement passiert wird, oder um einen Bereich, der in der unmittelbaren Umgebung dieser vom Bewegungselement passierten Zone liegt und somit gewissermaßen einen Gefahrenbereich darstellt. Ein Gegenstand, der sich also in diesem Gefahrenbereich befindet, kann beispielsweise aufgrund seiner räumlichen Ausdehnung möglicherweise eine Kollision mit dem Bewegungselement hervorrufen. In der Regel wird dieser Bewegungsraum oder wenigstens ein Teil dieses Bewegungsraumes von der Sicherungsvorrichtung bzw. den Sensoren überwacht, sodass die Gefahr einer Kollision verringert bzw. sogar gänzlich ausgeschlossen werden kann.The evaluation unit of the safety device according to the invention detects signals from the sensors and evaluates them, for example by a corresponding electronics. This detection can be carried out in the simplest way, that the evaluation unit is connected to the respective outputs of the sensors or wired. The sensors basically serve to detect an object, that is one Object or a person who enters the movement space of the movement element. The movement space is the space which is either passed directly by the movement element during the movement of the movement element, or an area which lies in the immediate vicinity of this zone passed by the movement element and thus to a certain extent constitutes a danger zone. An object which is thus located in this danger area may possibly cause a collision with the movement element, for example because of its spatial extent. As a rule, this movement space or at least part of this movement space is monitored by the securing device or the sensors, so that the risk of a collision can be reduced or even eliminated altogether.

Die Sensoren sind zudem so angeordnet bzw. ausgebildet, dass das Bewegunselement detektiert werde kann. Die Sensoren können beispielsweise in der Führungsschiene angebracht sein, in der das entsprechende Bewegungselement geführt und bewegt wird. Denkbar ist weiterhin, dass die Lichtschranken seitlich versetzt zur Führungsschiene angeordnet sind, z.B. parallel zur Führungsschiene angeordnet. Mitunter ist das Bewegungselement so ausgebildet bzw. angeordnet, dass es bei seiner geführten Bewegung von den Sensoren erfasst wird, indem zum Beispiel das Bewegungselement in den Detektionsbereich des Sensors eindringt. Unter anderem kann dies z. B. dazu ausgenutzt werden, die Position des Bewegungselementes bzw. des einen Abschnitts des Bewegungselemenzes durch die Sensoren zu bestimmen.The sensors are also arranged or designed so that the Bewegunselement can be detected. The sensors may, for example, be mounted in the guide rail, in which the corresponding movement element is guided and moved. It is also conceivable that the light barriers are arranged laterally offset from the guide rail, e.g. arranged parallel to the guide rail. Sometimes, the movement element is designed or arranged such that it is detected by the sensors during its guided movement, for example by the movement element penetrating into the detection area of the sensor. Among other things, this z. B. be used to determine the position of the moving element or a portion of the Bewegungselemenzes by the sensors.

Die Sensoren sind ferner dazu ausgebildet, Signale auszugeben, die unter anderem wenigstens die Information tragen, ob der Sensor ein Objekt, eine Person oder Ähnliches detektiert oder nicht. Im Falle einer einfachen Lichtschranke kann das Signal dementsprechend die Information tragen, ob die Lichtschranke unterbrochen ist oder nicht. Die entsprechenden Signale werden an die Auswerteeinheit übergeben bzw. von dieser erfasst.The sensors are further configured to output signals that, among other things, carry at least the information as to whether the sensor detects an object, a person or the like or not. In the case of a simple light barrier, the signal can accordingly carry the information as to whether the light barrier is interrupted or not. The corresponding signals are transferred to the evaluation unit or detected by the latter.

Die erfindungsgemäße Sicherungsvorrichtung bietet dabei eine besonders vorteilhafte Maßnahme, dadurch dass, sobald der Sensor etwas detektiert, unterschieden werden kann, ob es sich um ein Objekt handelt und gegebenenfalls Kollisionsgefahr besteht oder ob es sich um das Bewegungselement selbst handelt, welches bei seiner Bewegung vom Sensor erfasst wurde.The securing device according to the invention offers a particularly advantageous measure, characterized in that, as soon as the sensor detects something, it can be distinguished whether it is an object and if there is a risk of collision or if it is the moving element itself, which in its movement from the sensor was recorded.

Die Erfindung nutzt die Erkenntnis, dass die Unterscheidung von Bewegungselement und Objekt, das eine Kollision hervorrufen könnte, durch die stationäre Analyse des Signalzustandes auch ohne Betrachtung eines zeitlichen Verlaufs gefunden werden kann. Dazu können diejenigen Signalbilder, die der Detektion eines Objektes entsprechen, vorab definiert werden. Die Feststellung, ob ein Objekt detektiert ist, erfolgt dann durch Vergleich mit den definierten Signalbildern.The invention makes use of the insight that the distinction between the movement element and the object that could cause a collision can be found by the stationary analysis of the signal state even without a consideration of a time course. For this purpose, those signal images which correspond to the detection of an object can be defined in advance. The determination as to whether an object is detected is then made by comparison with the defined signal images.

Dementsprechend zeichnet sich die erfindungsgemäße Sicherungsvorrichtung dadurch aus, die Auswerteeinheit dazu ausgebildet ist, von den wenigstens zwei Sensoren einen aktuell detektierten Zustandsvektor aus einer Menge an Zustandsvektoren, welche eindeutig alle möglichen Kombinationen der Signale der Sensoren umfassen, zu erfassen und im Falle vorbestimmter Zustandsvektoren das Abschaltsignal zu generieren.Accordingly, the security device according to the invention is characterized in that the evaluation unit is designed to detect from the at least two sensors a currently detected state vector from a set of state vectors, which unambiguously comprise all possible combinations of the signals of the sensors, and in the case of predetermined state vectors, the shutdown signal to generate.

Ein Zustandsvektor umfasst im Sinne der Erfindung einzelne Informationen bzw. Informationsgehalte der Signale der Sensoren. Der Zustandsvektor ist so ausgebildet, dass diese Informationen oder Informationsgehalte den einzelnen Sensoren zugeordnet werden können. Die Informationen bzw. Informationsgehalte können insbesondere die Information umfassen, ob der Sensor etwas (ein Objekt / eine Person oder das Bewegungselement) detektiert oder nicht. Beispielsweise kann als Zustandsvektor die Gesamtheit der Signale aller Ausgänge der Sensoren angesehen werden. Im einfachsten Fall besteht die Information aus einem digitalen Signal, d.h. 0 oder 1; liegt z.B. eine Spannung am Ausgang des Sensors an, wird von Sensor etwas detektiert und umgekehrt.A state vector in the sense of the invention comprises individual information or information contents of the signals of the sensors. The state vector is designed such that this information or information contents can be assigned to the individual sensors. The information or information contents may in particular include the information as to whether the sensor detects something (an object / a person or the movement element) or not. For example, as a state vector, the entirety of the signals of all outputs of the sensors can be viewed. In the simplest case, the information consists of a digital signal, ie 0 or 1; If, for example, a voltage is present at the output of the sensor, something is detected by the sensor and vice versa.

Der Zustandsvektor kann in verschiedenster Weise ausgebildet sein. Denkbar ist zum einen, dass eine Speichereinheit, z.B. eine Registerbank, vorgesehen ist, wobei jedem Register ein entsprechender Sensor zugeordnet werden kann. Denkbar ist auch, dass lediglich elektrische Leitungen vorhanden sind, die sich jeweils einem Sensor zuordnen lassen. Die Informationen, sowohl über die Detektion des Sensors als auch darüber, um welchen Sensor es sich handelt, können auch in sonstiger Weise codiert vorliegen, etwa durch einen Zahlencode, indem bestimmten Sensoren mit bestimmten Zuständen unterschiedliche Zahlenwerte zugeordnet werden. Über die Zuordnung, welcher Sensor welches Signal bzw. welche Information geliefert hat, ist dann auch bekannt, wo der Sensor angeordnet ist bzw. welche Position er besitzt.The state vector can be designed in various ways. It is conceivable on the one hand that a memory unit, e.g. a register bank, is provided, wherein each register a corresponding sensor can be assigned. It is also conceivable that only electrical lines are available, each of which can be assigned to a sensor. The information, both about the detection of the sensor and about which sensor it is, can also be encoded in some other way, for example by a numerical code, by assigning different numerical values to certain sensors with specific states. On the assignment, which sensor has supplied which signal or which information, it is then also known where the sensor is arranged or which position it has.

Die Auswerteeinheit erfasst den Zustandsvektor, d.h. im einfachsten Fall sind die Ausgänge der Sensoren mit der Auswerteeinheit verbunden. Die Menge aller möglichen Zustandsvektoren umfasst also in eindeutiger Weise alle möglichen Kombinationen der Signale der Sensoren. Aus dem Zustandsvektor ist insbesondere eindeutig erkennbar bzw. ableitbar, welcher Sensor etwas detektiert oder nicht.The evaluation unit detects the state vector, i. In the simplest case, the outputs of the sensors are connected to the evaluation unit. The set of all possible state vectors thus unambiguously includes all possible combinations of the signals of the sensors. In particular, it can be clearly identified or deduced from the state vector which sensor detects something or not.

Die Zustandsvektoren können wiederholt, beispielsweise periodisch, grundsätzlich aber auch kontinuierlich erfasst werden. Der aktuell detektierte Zustandsvektor ist der Zustandsvektor, der herangezogen wird, um zu bestimmen, ob gerade jetzt oder in einer gewissen aktuellen Zeitspanne eine Kollisionsgefahr besteht oder nicht.The state vectors can be repeated, for example, periodically, but in principle also continuously detected. The currently detected state vector is the state vector that is used to determine whether or not there is a danger of collision right now or in some current time span.

Die erfindungsgemäße Sicherungsvorrichtung umfasst Sensoren, die sowohl das Bewegungselement als auch ein Objekt erfassen können. Die Auswerteeinheit wertet lediglich die Informationen aus dem Zustandsvektor aus, ob ein Gegenstand von einem Sensor detektiert wurde oder nicht und um welchen Sensor es sich jeweils dabei handelt. Jede einzelne Information eines einzelnen Sensors für sich genommen beinhaltet nur die Information, ob grundsätzlich vom jeweiligen Sensor etwas detektiert wird oder nicht. Diese einzelne Information lässt noch nicht den Schluss zu, ob es sich bei dem detektierten Gegenstand um das Bewegungselement oder ein Objekt handelt, das eine Kollision hervorrufen könnte. Dieser Schluss kann aber aus der Gesamtheit dieser Informationen aller Signale gezogen werden. Das Bewegungselement wird beispielsweise bei seiner Bewegung nacheinander einen Sensor nach dem anderen abdecken und also von diesen Sensoren jeweils detektiert werden. Bei der Bewegung des Bewegungselementes wird also ein charakteristisches "Muster" erzeugt, welche Sensoren etwas detektieren und welche nicht. Weichen die Signale der Sensoren von diesen möglichen Mustern ab, so ist regelmäßig ein Objekt in den Bewegungsraum eingedrungen und es besteht Kollisionsgefahr; sodann erzeugt die Auswerteeinheit ein Abschaltsignal. Es sind dementsprechend alle Zustandsvektoren grundsätzlich bekannt, die bedeuten, dass entweder nichts detektiert wird oder das Bewegungselement detektiert wird oder ein Objekt mit Kollisionsgefahr detektiert wird. Bei den entsprechenden vorbestimmten Zustandsvektoren wird folglich das Abschaltsignal erzeugt.The safety device according to the invention comprises sensors which can detect both the movement element and an object. The evaluation unit only evaluates the information from the state vector whether an object has been detected by a sensor or not and which sensor it is in each case. Each individual piece of information of a single sensor in itself contains only the information, whether in principle of the respective sensor something is detected or not. This single information does not yet permit the conclusion as to whether the detected object is the moving element or an object that could cause a collision. But this conclusion can be drawn from the totality of this information of all signals. The movement element, for example, during its movement successively cover one sensor after another and thus be detected by these sensors each. During the movement of the movement element, therefore, a characteristic "pattern" is generated which sensors detect something and which are not. If the signals of the sensors deviate from these possible patterns, an object has regularly entered the movement space and there is a danger of collision; then the evaluation unit generates a shutdown signal. Accordingly, all state vectors are known in principle, which mean that either nothing is detected or the motion element is detected or an object with the risk of collision is detected. Consequently, the shutdown signal is generated at the corresponding predetermined state vectors.

Denkbar sind im Allgemeinen verschiedene Fälle einer Auswertung. Die Signale der Sensoren können beispielsweise durch eine logische Schaltung bzw. durch einen Multiplexer ausgewertet werden, insbesondere dann, wenn als Signale digitale Werte zur Verfügung stehen. Die Entscheidung, ob ein Abschaltsignal erzeugt wird, d. h. ob ein vorbestimmter Zustandsvektor vorliegt, kann dadurch getroffen werden, dass entweder bestimmte, fest vorgegebene Ausgangsleitungen der logischen Schaltung bzw. des Multiplexers angesprochen werden. Denkbar ist aber grundsätzlich auch, dass die vorbestimmten Zustandsvektoren zum Vergleich bereit stehen. Beispielsweise können die Zustandsvektoren auch als Zahlenwerte vorliegen, die in einem Register zwischengespeichert werden, wobei in einem weiteren Speicher die vorbestimmten Zustandsvektoren abgespeichert sind und dann ein Vergleich vorgenommen wird. Denkbar ist auch ein digitaler Vergleich durch logische Schaltelemente.In general, different cases of an evaluation are conceivable. The signals of the sensors can be evaluated, for example, by a logic circuit or by a multiplexer, in particular if digital signals are available as signals. The decision as to whether a shutdown signal is generated, that is, whether a predetermined state vector is present, can be made by either addressing certain fixed output lines of the logic circuit or of the multiplexer. However, it is also conceivable in principle that the predetermined state vectors are ready for comparison. For example, the state vectors can also be present as numerical values which are buffer-stored in a register, wherein the predetermined state vectors are stored in a further memory and then a comparison is made. Also conceivable is a digital comparison by logical switching elements.

Die erfindungsgemäße Sicherungsvorrichtung ist in vorteilhafter Weise nicht nur im dynamischen Fall einsetzbar, also während der Bewegung des Bewegungselementes, sondern auch im statischen Fall, wenn zum Beispiel das Tor wieder angeschaltet wird, wobei das Tor vollständig ausgefahren., vollständig eingefahren oder sich in einem Zwischenzustand befinden kann.The securing device according to the invention is advantageously used not only in the dynamic case, ie during the movement of the moving element, but also in the static case, when, for example, the gate is turned on again, the gate fully extended., Completely retracted or in an intermediate state can be located.

Die Sicherungsvorrichtung ist insbesondere kaum fehlerarfällig und ermöglicht eine besonders hohe Sicherheit, da der tatsächliche Sensorzustand im Einzelnen immer überprüft wird. Zudem müssen Sensoren nicht aktiviert oder deaktiviert werden.The security device is in particular hardly prone to errors and allows a particularly high level of security, since the actual sensor status is always checked in detail. In addition, sensors do not have to be activated or deactivated.

Die erfindungsgemäße Sicherungsvorrichtung besitzt weiterhin den Vorteil, dass praktisch keine baulichen Änderungen an einer entsprechenden Schließvorrichtung an einem Tor usw. vorgenommen werden müssen, z.B. im Sinne einer Anbringung spezieller Reflexionsfahnen. Sie ermöglicht daher eine besonders gute Nachrüstbarkeit.The securing device according to the invention also has the advantage that virtually no structural changes have to be made to a corresponding closing device on a gate, etc., e.g. in the sense of attaching special reflection flags. It therefore allows a particularly good retrofitting.

Bei einer Ausführungsform der Erfindung kann auch ein detektierter Zustandsvektor wenigstens temporär gespeichert werden, um für einen späteren Vergleich mit dem aktuellen Zustandsvektor verwendet zu werden. Denkbar ist eine Zwischenspeicherung in einem Register, sonstige Verwendung von Flipflop-Schaltungen oder Ähnliches. Diese Maßnahme ist auch dann vorteilhaft, wenn zum Beispiel bei der Bewegung des Bewegungselementes ein Zustandsvektor vorliegt und daher bekannt ist, welcher Zustandsvektor als nächstes vorliegen sollte. Durch diese Maßnahme kann daher die Sicherheit und Zuverlässigkeit der Vorrichtung noch einmal erhöht werden. Gegebenenfalls kann zum Beispiel bei einem Tor, bei dem ein so genannter "Blowout" möglich ist (z.B. beim Folientor), noch zuverlässiger zwischen einem Blowout-Fall und einer Kollisionsgefahr durch ein Objekt unterschieden werden.In one embodiment of the invention, a detected state vector may also be stored at least temporarily to be used for later comparison with the current state vector. It is conceivable caching in a register, other use of flip-flop circuits or the like. This measure is also advantageous if, for example, there is a state vector during the movement of the movement element and therefore it is known which state vector should be present next. By this measure, therefore, the safety and reliability of the device can be increased again. If necessary, for example, in the case of a gate in which a so-called "blowout" is possible (for example in the case of the film gate), a distinction can be made even more reliably between a blowout case and a danger of collision by an object.

Des Weiteren kann auch die Zeit während der Bewegung des Bewegungselementes durch einen Zeitgeber aufgenommen werden. Anhand dieser Information kann z.B. geschlossen werden, welcher Zustandsvektor gerade vorliegen sollte. Denkbar ist ferner, anhand dieser Zeit einzelne vorbestimmte Zustandsvektoren auszuwählen, die für einen vergleich bzw. für die Entscheidung, ob das Abschaltsignal generiert wird, verwendet werden können. Dadurch kann etwa im Fall eines Teleskop-Tors die Sicherheit erhöht werden, da bei einem solchen Tor nach einer bestimmten Zeit Torelemente ausschwenken können und nicht mehr von den Sensoren detektiert werden. Grundsätzlich kann dieser Fall auch für eine Blowout-Detektion genutzt werden, da im Falle eines "Blowout" das Bewegungselement teilweise aus der Führung gerät und z.B. an dieser Stelle nicht mehr detektiert wird.Furthermore, the time during the movement of the moving element can be recorded by a timer. Based on this information can be closed, for example, which state vector should be present. It is also conceivable, on the basis of this time, to select individual predetermined state vectors which can be used for a comparison or for the decision as to whether the shutdown signal is generated. As a result, safety can be increased, for example in the case of a telescopic door, since in such a door gate elements can swing out after a certain time and can no longer be detected by the sensors. Basically, this case can also be used for a blowout detection, since in the case of a "blowout" the movement element is partially out of the guide and, for example, is no longer detected at this point.

Bei einer Weiterbildung der Erfindung ist die Auswerteeinheit dazu ausgebildet, aus einer Menge an Zustandsvektoren, welche die Signale der jeweiligen Sensoren einzeln in Abhängigkeit von deren Position umfassen, jedem Zustandsvektor eindeutig genau eine Zustandsinformation aus einer vorbestimmten Zielmenge über eine bijektive Abbildung zuzuordnen, und im Falle vorbestimmter Zustandsinformationen das Abschaltsignal zu generieren.In a further development of the invention, the evaluation unit is designed to assign each state vector unambiguously exactly one state information from a predetermined target quantity via a bijective mapping from a set of state vectors which comprise the signals of the respective sensors individually as a function of their position, and in the case predetermined state information to generate the shutdown signal.

Durch die Auswerteeinheit wird jedem Zustandsvektor eindeutig genau eine Zustandsinformation zugeordnet. Die Zustandsinformation kann zum Beispiel ein bestimmtes Signal sein. Es kann sich z.B. um ein elektrisches oder optisches Signal handeln. Die Zustandsinformation kann aber auch aus einem Zahlenwert bestehen. Die Zielmenge besteht aus allen möglichen bzw. in Frage kommenden Zustandsinformationen, die den Zustandsvektoren zugeordnet werden können. Jede mögliche Zustandsinformation ist ein Element der Zielmenge. Die Zielmenge umfasst keine Elemente, die nicht einem Zustandsvektor zugeordnet werden können. Die Menge der Zustandsvektoren kann demnach wiederum so viele Elemente aufweisen, wie es denkbare Zustände der Sensoren gibt.The evaluation unit uniquely assigns exactly one state information to each state vector. The state information may be, for example, a specific signal. It can be e.g. to act as an electrical or optical signal. The state information can also consist of a numerical value. The target set consists of all possible or possible state information that can be assigned to the state vectors. Any state information is an element of the target set. The target set does not include any elements that can not be assigned to a state vector. Accordingly, the set of state vectors can again have as many elements as there are conceivable states of the sensors.

Umfasst beispielsweise eine Sicherungsvorrichtung n Lichtschranken (n: natürliche Zahl, n > 0), die jeweils als Signale 0 oder 1 (nicht unterbrochen oder unterbrochen) ausgeben, so umfasst die Menge aller möglichen Zustandsvektcren 2n (2 hoch n) Elemente. Sodann umfasst die Zielmenge ebenfalls 2n (2 hoch n) Elemente.For example, a fuse device includes n photoelectric sensors (n: natural number, n> 0), each as signals 0 or 1 (not interrupted or interrupted) output, the set of all possible state vectors comprises 2 n (2 high n) elements. Then, the target amount also includes 2 n (2 high n) elements.

Diese Abbildung ist bijektiv, dass heißt sie ist sowohl injektiv als auch surjektiv. Injektivität bedeutet, dass kein Wert der Zielmenge mehreren Elementen der aus der Menge der Zustandsvektoren zugeordnet wird. Surjektivität wiederum bedeutet, dass jeder Wert der Zielmenge auch einem Element der aus der Menge der Zustandsvektoren zugeordnet wird. Mathematisch bedeutet dies, dass auch eine Umkehrfunktion existiert. Das heißt, aus der Information, welche Zustandsinformation (Element der Zielmenge) gerade vorliegt, kann eineindeutig geschlossen werden, welcher Zustandsvektor, d.h. welche kombination von Signalen von welchen Sensoren in die Auswerteeinheit eingegeben wurde.This illustration is bijective, meaning that it is both injective and surjective. Injectivity means that no value of the target set is assigned to several elements of the set of state vectors. Surjectivity, in turn, means that each value of the target quantity is also assigned to an element of the set of state vectors. Mathematically, this means that there is also an inverse function. That is, from the information which state information (element of the target amount) is currently present, one can uniquely conclude which state vector, i. which combination of signals from which sensors was entered into the evaluation unit.

Es sind verschiedene Möglichkeiten denkbar, wie eine derartige bijektive Abbildung in der Auswerteeinheit durchgeführt werden kann.There are various possibilities conceivable, such as such a bijective mapping can be performed in the evaluation.

Unter anderem ist denkbar, dass die Auswerteeinheit einen Multiplexer umfasst, der mehrere Eingänge aufweist und in Abhängigkeit davon, welche Eingänge angesprochen werden bzw. Signale empfangen werden, unterschiedliche Ausgänge anspricht bzw. Signale über unterschiedliche Ausgänge ausgibt. Die zugehörigen Eingänge des Multiplexers zusammen entsprechen dann dem Zustandsvektor.Among other things, it is conceivable that the evaluation unit comprises a multiplexer which has a plurality of inputs and, depending on which inputs are addressed or signals are received, responds to different outputs or outputs signals via different outputs. The associated inputs of the multiplexer together then correspond to the state vector.

So ist auch eine logische Schaltung denkbar, welche die Zustände der einzelnen Sensoren über zugeordnete Signaleingänge aufnimmt und logisch so verknüpft, dass nur im Falle vordefinierter Signalmuster ein entsprechendes Steuersignal, insbesondere ein Abschaltsignal, ausgegeben wird.Thus, a logic circuit is conceivable which receives the states of the individual sensors via associated signal inputs and logically linked so that only in the case of predefined signal pattern, a corresponding control signal, in particular a shutdown signal is output.

Anhand der Zustandsinformation, die schließlich durch die bijektive Abbildung erhalten wird, ist eindeutig eine weitere Zuordnung möglich. Grundsätzlich sind alle Zustandsinformationen, die ausgegeben werden können, bekannt. Einige davon sind für den Fall eines regulären Betriebs vorbestimmt, andere für den Fall, dass eine Störung bzw. Kollisionsgefahr besteht. Bei regulärem Betrieb, d.h. das Bewegungselement wird bewegt, ohne dass ein Objekt währenddessen in den Bewegungsraum eindringt oder eine sonstige Störung vorliegt, treten gewisse vorbestimmte Zustandsinformationen auf. Wird eine andere Zustandsinformation ausgegeben, so liegt kein regulärer Betrieb vor: Das Bewegungselement ist zu stoppen.Based on the state information, which is finally obtained by the bijective mapping, a further assignment is clearly possible. Basically all are State information that can be output is known. Some of them are predetermined in the case of regular operation, others in the event of a breakdown or collision hazard. In regular operation, ie, the moving element is moved without an object penetrates into the movement space during this time or there is some other disturbance, certain predetermined state information occurs. If another status information is output, then there is no regular operation: The movement element is to be stopped.

Bei einer vorteilhaften Ausführungsform der Erfindung ist die Auswerteeinheit dazu ausgebildet, den Sensoren jeweils einen Zahlenwert in Abhängigkeit von deren Position und von deren Signal zuzuordnen und den Zustandsvektor aus diesen Zahlenwerten zusammenzusetzen. Als Auswerteeinheit kann beispielsweise auch ein Mikrocontroller oder ein Prozessor verwendet werden. Die entsprechende mathematische Operation kann durch eine einfache Programmierung des Mikrocontrollers bzw. Prozessors durchgeführt werden.In an advantageous embodiment of the invention, the evaluation unit is designed to assign the sensors in each case a numerical value as a function of their position and their signal and to assemble the state vector from these numerical values. As an evaluation unit, for example, a microcontroller or a processor can be used. The corresponding mathematical operation can be carried out by a simple programming of the microcontroller or processor.

Mit den Signalen wird eine mathematische Operation durchgeführt, die zu einem einzigen Zahlenwert bzw. Ergebniswert führt. Die mathematische Operation stellt eine bijektive Abbildung dar. Die Menge aller möglichen Kombinationen von Signalen aller Lichtschranken, welche also in die Auswerteeinheit eingehen können, bildet gewissermaßen die Definitionsmenge der Abbildung. Jedem Element der Definitionsmenge wird ein Element der Zielmenge durch die mathematische Operation, also die Abbildung, zugeordnet. Alle so gewonnenen Zahlenwerte, welche durch die bijektive Abbildung Zustandsvektoren zugeordnet werden, bilden zusammen die Zielmenge.The signals are used to perform a mathematical operation that results in a single numerical value or result value. The mathematical operation represents a bijective mapping. The set of all possible combinations of signals of all light barriers, which can therefore enter into the evaluation unit, effectively forms the definition set of the mapping. Each element of the definition set is assigned an element of the target set by the mathematical operation, ie the mapping. All numerical values thus obtained, which are assigned to state vectors by the bijective mapping, together form the target quantity.

Da also der Ergebniswert gewissermaßen eine Codierung darstellt, welcher Sensor etwas detektiert und welcher nicht, lässt sich aus dieser Information auch ableiten, ob das Objekt oder das Bewegungselement detektiert wird. Wurde lediglich das Bewegungselement detektiert, so kann bei Bewegung des Bewegungselementes diese fortgesetzt werden, da grundsätzlich keine Kollisionsgefahr zu befürchten ist. Wird jedoch ausschließlich oder zusätzlich ein Objekt detektiert, so ist tatsächlich diese Kollisionsgefahr zu befürchten und die Bewegung des Bewegungselementes ist zu stoppen.Since, therefore, the result value effectively represents an encoding, which sensor detects something and which does not, it can also be deduced from this information whether the object or the movement element is detected. If only the movement element was detected, then during movement of the Movement element these continue, because in principle no risk of collision is to be feared. However, if exclusively or additionally an object is detected, then in fact this risk of collision is to be feared and the movement of the movement element is to be stopped.

Als mathematische Operation kann beispielsweise eine Addition bei einer Ausführungsform der Erfindung vorgesehen sein. Eine solche mathematische Funktion wird in der Regel von den meisten handelsüblichen Prozessoren / Mikrocontrollern zur Verfügung gestellt. Zudem ermöglicht ein derartiger Mikrocontroller bzw. Prozessor eine rasche Signalverarbeitung.As a mathematical operation, for example, an addition may be provided in an embodiment of the invention. Such a mathematical function is usually provided by most commercially available processors / microcontrollers. In addition, such a microcontroller or processor enables rapid signal processing.

Um ein Abschaltsignal zu generieren, können bei einer bevorzugten Weiterbildung der Erfindung die vorbestimmten Zustandsinformationen als Vergleichszahlen in einer Vergleichstabelle, welche in einer Speichereinheit wie einer Registerbank oder einem EEPROM (engl.: electrically erasable programmable read-only memory) hinterlegt werden, gespeichert werden. Anschließend werden die Zahlenwerte / Ergebniswerte mit den Vergleichszahlen verglichen. Handelt es sich bei den Ergebniswerten um einen der Vergleichswerte, so liegt z.B. ein regulärer Fall vor, andernfalls wird ein Abschaltsignal generiert. Denkbar ist grundsätzlich auch in umgekehrter Weise, nur Vergleichwerte abzuspeichern, die einem nicht regulären Betrieb entsprechen, sodass bei Übereinstimmung ein Abschaltsignal generiert wird.In order to generate a shutdown signal, in a preferred development of the invention, the predetermined state information can be stored as comparative numbers in a comparison table, which are stored in a memory unit such as a register bank or an EEPROM (electrically erasable programmable read-only memory). Subsequently, the numerical values / result values are compared with the comparative figures. If the result values are one of the comparison values, then e.g. a regular case, otherwise a shutdown signal is generated. It is also conceivable, in principle, to store only comparison values which correspond to a non-regular operation, so that a shutdown signal is generated if they match.

Die Auswertung des Ergebniswertes kann nicht nur durch Vorgabe einer Vergleichstabelle und Durchführung eines Zahlenvergleichs, sondern auch durch Einprogrammierung einer sonstigen mathematischen Operation (z.B. eine mathematische Funktion, logische Gatter (engl.: AND, OR, NAND, NOR oder deren Kombinationen) oder dergleichen erfolgen, sodass dann, wenn entsprechende Ergebniswerte vorliegen, die Bewegung weitergeführt oder gestoppt werden kann. Derartige Elektronikbausteine wie Mikrocontroller, ferner auch entsprechende Speicherelemente und Register können in der Regel kostengünstig erworben werden. Regelmäßig wird der Speicherbedarf für eine entsprechende Vergleichstabelle auch so gering sein, dass die Speicher bzw. Register eines handelsüblichen Mikrocontrollers für diese Zwecke durchaus ausreichend sind. Daher kann auch eine kostengünstige Fertigung ermöglicht werden. In vorteilhafter Weise kann ein solcher Mikrocontroller gegebenenfalls auch in einfacher Weise umprogrammiert werden, falls beispielsweise zusätzliche Sensoren nachträglich eingebaut werden sollen.The evaluation of the result value can be done not only by specifying a comparison table and performing a numerical comparison, but also by programming another mathematical operation (eg, a mathematical function, logic gates (English: AND, OR, NAND, NOR or combinations thereof) or the like So that, if corresponding result values are available, the movement can be continued or stopped Such electronic components such as microcontrollers, as well as corresponding memory elements and registers can usually be purchased inexpensively Memory requirement for a corresponding comparison table also be so low that the memory or register of a commercial microcontroller for this purpose are quite sufficient. Therefore, a cost-effective production can be made possible. Advantageously, if necessary, such a microcontroller can also be reprogrammed in a simple manner, if, for example, additional sensors are to be retrofitted.

Denkbar ist ferner, jedem Sensor zunächst den Zahlenwert Null zuzuordnen, wenn der Sensor nichts detektiert, z.B. die Lichtschranke nicht unterbrochen ist.It is also conceivable first to assign the numerical value zero to each sensor when the sensor detects nothing, e.g. the photocell is not interrupted.

Die Auswerteeinheit kann beispielsweise die Zuordnung von Zahlenwerten unter anderem in Abhängigkeit vom jeweiligen Sensor durchzuführen. Diese Zuordnung kann bei einer Weiterbildung der Erfindung insbesondere so erfolgen, dass, je nach Position der einzelnen Sensoren, grundsätzlich andere Zahlen zugeordnet werden. Sind insgesamt beispielsweise N Sensoren vorhanden (wobei N ≥ 2 und N eine natürliche Zahl ist). Die N Sensoren können beispielsweise einzeln durchgezählt werden. Die Reihenfolge der Abzählung kann beispielsweise so erfolgen, dass nach Start der Bewegung eines Bewegungselementes im geöffneten Zustand des Bewegungselementes die Sensoren in der Reihenfolge abgezählt werden, wie sie vom Bewegungselement nach einander passiert werden.The evaluation unit can, for example, perform the assignment of numerical values inter alia as a function of the respective sensor. In a development of the invention, this assignment can in particular be made such that, depending on the position of the individual sensors, fundamentally different numbers are assigned. For example, if there are N sensors in total (where N≥2 and N is a natural number). The N sensors can be counted individually, for example. The order of counting, for example, done so that after starting the movement of a moving element in the open state of the moving element, the sensors are counted in the order as they are passed by the moving element after each other.

Bei einer vorteilhaften Ausführungsform der Erfindung wird dem n-ten Sensor (wobei n = 1, 2, ... N und wobei n, N: natürliche Zahlen) dann ein Ergebniswert zugeordnet, der als Funktion von n beschrieben werden kann, sofern der n-te Sensor etwas detektiert ist. Andernfalls wird einem Sensor, der nichts detektiert, der Wert Null zugeordnet. Denkbar ist beispielsweise, dem n-ten Sensor den Zahlenwert 2n-1 zuzuordnen. Es ist besonders vorteilhaft, eine Exponentialfunktion zu wählen, weil hierdurch ein stetig wachsender Abstand zwischen den Zahlenwerten, die den einzelnen unterbrochenen Lichtschranken zugeordnet werden können, erreicht wird. Ist ferner als mathematischer Operation eine Addition gewählt, so erleichtert dies, eine bijektive Abbildung zu realisieren, da die so vom regulären Betrieb abweichenden Ergebniswerte sich von denen des nicht-regulären Betriebs unterscheiden.In an advantageous embodiment of the invention, the nth sensor (where n = 1, 2, ... N and where n, N: natural numbers) is then assigned a result value that can be described as a function of n, provided that n -th sensor is detected something. Otherwise, a sensor that does not detect anything is assigned the value zero. It is conceivable, for example, to assign the numerical value 2 n-1 to the n-th sensor. It is particularly advantageous to choose an exponential function, because in this way a constantly increasing distance between the numerical values assigned to the individual interrupted light barriers can be achieved. Furthermore, if an addition is selected as a mathematical operation, this makes it easier to realize a bijective mapping, since the result values thus deviating from the regular operation differ from those of the non-regular operation.

Denkbar ist auch, Potenzen zu einer anderen Basis zu wählen, .z.B. zur Basis 3.It is also conceivable to choose powers to another basis, eg. to base 3.

Die Sicherheit der Sicherungsvorrichtung kann insbesondere dadurch erhöht werden, dass den Signalen und oder Ergebniswerten zusätzlich ein Zeitwert zugeordnet wird, der dem Zeitpunkt der Detektion entspricht. Beispielsweise kann der Zeitgeber dann zu laufen beginnen, wenn das Bewegungselement aktiviert wird. Gegebenenfalls kann der Zeitgeber dann gestoppt werden, wenn auch die Bewegung des Bewegungselementes gestoppt wird. Somit verfolgt der zeitgeber gewissermaßen die Zeitspanne mit, die während der Bewegung des Bewegungselementes bereits verstrichen ist. Der Zeitgeber misst dadurch gewissermaßen die Zeit der Bewegung des Bewegungselementes.The safety of the security device can be increased in particular by additionally assigning to the signals and / or result values a time value which corresponds to the time of detection. For example, the timer may begin to run when the motion element is activated. Optionally, the timer can then be stopped, even if the movement of the moving element is stopped. Thus, the timer keeps track of the amount of time that has already passed during the movement of the moving element. As a result, the timer measures the time of movement of the movement element.

Im Übrigen ist auch denkbar, die Auswerteeinheit dazu auszubilden, anhand der vom Zeitgeber bestimmten Zeit eine Sollposition des Bewegungselementes zu bestimmen, an welcher sich das Bewegungselement bei regulärem Betrieb befinden müsste. Diese Information kann beispielsweise mit der Information abgeglichen werden, welche Lichtschranken gerade unterbrochen sind bzw. nicht. Ist beispielsweise eine Lichtschranke unterbrochen, welche vom Bewegungselement noch gar nicht passiert sein kann, so kann es sich bei dem detektierten Gegenstand lediglich um ein Objekt handeln, und nicht um das Bewegungselement. Es besteht also eine Kollisionsgefahr. Es wird dann eine Abschaltsignal generiert. Die Auswerteeinheit kann dazu ausgebildet sein, anhand der Sollposition zu bestimmen, welche Sensoren infolge der Bewegung des Bewegungselementes unterbrochen und wieder frei sein sollten, und dementsprechend mittels der mathematischen Operation einen Sollwert errechnen, der sich aus den Signalen der bei regulärem Betrieb passierten Sensoren ergeben würde. Dementsprechend ist bei einer vorteilhaften Weiterbildung der Erfindung die Auswerteeinheit dazu ausgebildet, den Ergebniswert mit dem Sollwert zu vergleichen. Dementsprechend kann es besonderes vorteilhaft sein, die Auswerteeinheit so auszubilden, dass anhand der Sollposition bestimmt wird, welche Sensoren in Folge der Bewegung des Bewegungselementes das Bewegungselement erfasst haben sollten. Es wird mittels der mathematischen Operation ein Sollwert errechnet, der sich aus den Signalen der bei regulärem Betrieb unterbrochenen Lichtschranken ergeben würde, wenn als Sensoren z.B. Lichtschranken vorhanden sind. Die Auswerteeinheit kann also beispielsweise dazu ausgebildet sein, eine Gegenkontrolle durchzuführen. Aufgrund der durch den Zeitgeber bestimmten Zeit, die während der Bewegung des Bewegungselementes verstrichen ist, müsste beispielsweise eine gewisse Anzahl von Lichtschranken bereits passiert und somit unterbrochen sein. Ferner müsste also ein bestimmter Ergebniswert vorliegen, ein so genannter Sollwert. Dieser Sollwert wird mit dem tatsächlich ermittelten Ergebniswert verglichen. Stimmen die Werte nicht überein, so liegt kein regulärer Betrieb vor. Gegebenenfalls muss das Bewegungselement gestoppt werden. Denkbar ist beispielsweise, dass ein Objekt von einer Lichtschranke detektiert wird und sich deshalb eine Abweichung im Ergebniswert vom Sollwert ergibt. Grundsätzlich kann somit auch detektiert werden, ob eine sonstige Störung vorliegt. Beispielsweise könnte es sein, dass die Geschwindigkeit des Bewegungselementes nicht der beim regulären Betrieb geforderten Geschwindigkeit entspricht. Somit hat das Bewegungselement zu wenige oder zu viele Lichtschranken passiert. Gegebenenfalls kann in diesem Fall auch ein Stopp des Bewegungselementes durch ein entsprechendes Abschaltsignal erfolgen.Incidentally, it is also conceivable to design the evaluation unit to determine, based on the time determined by the timer, a desired position of the movement element at which the movement element would have to be in regular operation. This information can for example be compared with the information which photocells are currently interrupted or not. If, for example, a light barrier is interrupted, which still can not have happened at all by the movement element, then the detected object can only be an object, and not the movement element. So there is a risk of collision. It will then generate a shutdown signal. The evaluation unit may be designed to determine, based on the desired position, which sensors should be interrupted and released again as a result of the movement of the movement element, and accordingly calculate a desired value resulting from the signals by means of the mathematical operation would result in the sensors passing during normal operation. Accordingly, in an advantageous development of the invention, the evaluation unit is designed to compare the result value with the desired value. Accordingly, it can be particularly advantageous to design the evaluation unit in such a way that, based on the desired position, it is determined which sensors should have detected the movement element as a result of the movement of the movement element. By means of the mathematical operation, a setpoint value is calculated, which would result from the signals of the light barriers interrupted during normal operation if, for example, photoelectric sensors are present as sensors. The evaluation unit can thus be designed, for example, to carry out a countercheck. Due to the time determined by the timer, which has elapsed during the movement of the movement element, for example, a certain number of light barriers would have already happened and thus be interrupted. Furthermore, therefore, a certain result value would have to exist, a so-called setpoint. This setpoint is compared with the actually determined result value. If the values do not match, then there is no regular operation. If necessary, the movement element must be stopped. It is conceivable, for example, that an object is detected by a light barrier and therefore results in a deviation in the result value from the desired value. In principle, it is therefore also possible to detect whether there is another fault. For example, it could be that the speed of the moving element does not correspond to the speed required during regular operation. Thus, the moving element has passed too few or too many light barriers. Optionally, in this case, a stop of the movement element by a corresponding switch-off signal.

Denkbar ist weiterhin, im Zusammenhang mit einem derartigen Sollwert eine gewisse Toleranz mit zu berücksichtigen. Die Geschwindigkeit des Bewegungselementes ist regelmäßig auch nur in einem gewissen Toleranzbereich bekannt. Daher kann es vorkommen, dass auch bei regulärem Betrieb unter Berücksichtigung dieser Toleranzen einen Sensor gerade passiert wird oder auch nicht, weil das Bewegungselement bei der größten anzunehmenden und noch tolerierbaren Geschwindigkeit den Sensor gerade passiert hätte, während bei einer Geschwindigkeit an der unteren Toleranzgrenze der Sensor noch nicht passiert worden wäre bzw. noch nicht das Bewegungselement erfassen kann, da es z.B. sich noch außer Reichweite des Sensors befindet.It is also conceivable to take into account a certain tolerance in connection with such a desired value. The speed of the movement element is regularly known only within a certain tolerance range. Therefore, it may happen that even with regular operation under Considering these tolerances a sensor is just passed or not, because the moving element at the largest assumed and still tolerable speed would have just passed the sensor, while at a speed at the lower tolerance limit of the sensor would not have happened or not yet the moving element can capture, for example, because it is still out of range of the sensor.

Eine derartige Ausführungsform ist insbesondere dann vorteilhaft, wenn es sich um ein Bewegungselement handelt, das eine Teleskopbewegung ausführt. Ein Teleskop-Bewegungselement besitzt aus wenigstens zwei Elementen, welche in parallelen Schienen geführt werden. Bei vollständiger Öffnung befinden sich die Elemente rechtwinklig zur Schließebene am Rand der entsprechenden Öffnung während des Schließvorgangs bzw. der Bewegung befindet sich mindestens ein Element in Bewegung. Ist der Schließvorgang abgeschlossen, befinden sich die Elemente jeweils nebeneinander angeordnet. Beispielsweise bewegen sich die einzelnen Elemente so, dass bei geöffnetem Tor die Sensoren zunächst einer nach dem anderen passiert werden, bis etwa die Hälfte der Toröffnung erreicht ist. Anschließend endet die Erfassung durch den zuerst passierten Sensor, und so wird in derselben Reihenfolge zeitweise ein Sensor nach dem anderen wieder "freigegeben".Such an embodiment is particularly advantageous when it is a moving element that performs a telescopic movement. A telescopic moving element has at least two elements, which are guided in parallel rails. When fully opened, the elements are perpendicular to the closing plane at the edge of the corresponding opening during the closing process or the movement is at least one element in motion. When the closing operation is completed, the elements are arranged next to each other. For example, move the individual elements so that when the door is open, the sensors are first passed one after the other until about half of the door opening is reached. Subsequently, the detection ends by the sensor first passed, and so one sensor after another is "released" in the same order at times.

Um dementsprechend einen Sollwert zu bestimmen, ist es notwendig, eine entsprechende Zeitinformation zu erhalten. Ansonsten könnte nur durch eine Kollisionsgefahr bzw. einen Störfall erklärt werden, warum die zunächst passierten Lichtschranken wieder geöffnet sind und beispielsweise nur Sensoren in der Mitte der Toröffnung eine Detektion anzeigen. Dieser Fall muss dann als regulärer Betrieb und nicht als Störfall interpretiert werden. Grundsätzlich ist es also denkbar, dass zwei unterschiedliche Fälle eintreten können, bei denen jedoch die Sensoren in gleicher Weise etwas detektieren oder nicht. In einem Fall kann zum Beispiel ein Störfall vorliegen (z.B.: Tor im oberen Bereich aus der Führung geraten), während im anderen Fall ein regulärer Betrieb vorliegt (z.B. : obere Lichtschranke bei Teleskoptor nach gewisser Zeit nicht mehr unterbrachen).In order to determine a target value accordingly, it is necessary to obtain a corresponding time information. Otherwise it could only be explained by a risk of collision or an accident, why the initially passed photocells are opened again and, for example, only sensors in the middle of the door opening indicate a detection. This case must then be interpreted as a regular operation and not as an accident. In principle, it is therefore conceivable that two different cases may occur, but in which the sensors detect something in the same way or not. In one case, for example, an accident may be present (eg: Tor in the upper area get out of the guide), while in the other case a regular Operation is present (eg: upper photocell at Teleskoptor after some time no longer interrupted).

Die Sensoren können zum Beispiel als Lichtschranken ausgebildet sein. Denkbar ist aber auch, einen Time-of-flight-(Abk.: TOF-) Sensor einzusetzen. Ein TOF-Sensor ermöglicht grundsätzlich in vorteilhafter Weise zudem eine Abstands- bzw. Positionsbestimmung eines detektierten Objekts. Denkbar ist allerdings, den TOF-Sensor so zu verwenden, dass nur die Information gewonnen wird, ob überhaupt etwas detektiert wird oder nicht.The sensors can be designed, for example, as light barriers. It is also conceivable, however, to use a time-of-flight (abbreviation: TOF) sensor. In principle, a TOF sensor advantageously also enables a distance or position determination of a detected object. However, it is conceivable to use the TOF sensor in such a way that only the information is obtained whether something is detected at all or not.

Die Sensoren können bei einer bevorzugten Weiterbildung der Erfindung parallel zur Bewegungsrichtung des Bewegungselements angeordnet sein, ferner insbesondere so, dass sie in der Bewegungsebene des Bewegungselementes liegen. Die parallele Anordnung entlang der Bewegungsrichtung ermöglicht, dass nacheinander ein Sensor nach dem anderen das sich bewegende Bewegungselement detektieren kann. Die Anordnung in der Bewegungsebene ermöglicht, dass der Bewegungsraum, in dem eine Kollisionsgefahr bestehen könnte, möglichst vollständig überwacht wird.The sensors can be arranged in a preferred development of the invention parallel to the direction of movement of the moving element, further in particular so that they lie in the plane of movement of the moving element. The parallel arrangement along the direction of movement allows successively one sensor after another to detect the moving moving element. The arrangement in the plane of motion allows the movement space in which a risk of collision could exist to be monitored as completely as possible.

Die Sensoren können ferner senkrecht zur Bewegungsrichtung angeordnet sein, um z.B. den Bewegungsraum gleichmäßig abzurastern.The sensors may further be arranged perpendicular to the direction of movement, e.g. to evenly scrape the movement space.

Die Auswerteeinheit kann auch dazu ausgebildet sein, die Bewegung des Bewegungselementes zu unterbrechen. Beispielsweise kann eine entsprechende Schalteinheit, ein Schütz bzw. ein Relais oder dergleichen in die Auswerteeinheit integriert sei. Denkbar ist, die Steuerung und/oder Regelung des Bewegungselementes in die Auswerteeinheit zu einer möglichst kompakten Einheit zu integrieren. Die Auswerteeinheit kann also auch als Kontrolleinheit zur Kontrolle, d.h. zur Steuerung und/oder Regelung der Bewegung das Bewegungselenentes ausgebildet sein. Unter anderem kann die Kontrolleinheit auch dazu ausgebildet sein, einen Befehl eines Benutzers zu empfangen, das Tor zu schließen oder die Bewegung des Tores zu unterbrechen. Ein solcher Befehl kann beispielsweise über ein Bedienpult, eine Fernbedienung, gegebenenfalls akustisch oder in sonstiger Weise abgegeben werden.The evaluation unit can also be designed to interrupt the movement of the movement element. For example, a corresponding switching unit, a contactor or a relay or the like may be integrated into the evaluation unit. It is conceivable to integrate the control and / or regulation of the movement element in the evaluation unit to a compact unit as possible. The evaluation unit can therefore also be designed as a control unit for checking, ie for controlling and / or regulating the movement, the moment of movement. Among other things, the control unit can also be designed to receive a command from a user to close the gate or the To interrupt movement of the gate. Such a command can be issued, for example via a control panel, a remote control, optionally acoustically or in any other way.

Grundsätzlich können von der Auswerteeinheit die Zustandsvektoren kcntinuierlich oder in zeitlichen Abständen wiederholt erfasst werden, insbesondere auch periodisch.In principle, the evaluation unit can repeatedly detect the state vectors continuously or at intervals, in particular also periodically.

Ferner zeichnet sich dementsprechend eine Schließvorrichtung mit einem bewegbaren, geführten Bewegungselement und einer Sicherungsvorrichtung dadurch aus, dass eine erfindungsgemäße Sicherungsvorrichtung bzw. ein Ausführungsbeispiel der Erfindung verwendet wird. Bei einer vorteilhaften Weiterbildung der Erfindung ist das Bewegungselement als Tor ausgebildet. Wenigstens einer der Sensoren ist so angeordnet, dass das Bewegungselement vom Sensor detektiert werden kann.Furthermore, accordingly, a closing device with a movable, guided moving element and a securing device is characterized in that a securing device according to the invention or an embodiment of the invention is used. In an advantageous embodiment of the invention, the movement element is designed as a gate. At least one of the sensors is arranged so that the movement element can be detected by the sensor.

Es ist denkbar, eine bestehende Sicherungsvorrichtung bzw. eine bestehende Schließvorrichtung nachzurüsten, indem lediglich eine erfindungsgemäße Auswerteeinheit zur Auswertung von Sensoren zur Generierung eines Abschaltsignals eingebaut wird. Die bestehende Sicherungsvorrichtung bzw. die bestehende Schließvorrichtung kann somit zu einer Ausführungsform der Erfindung werden. Die Auswerteeinheit kann gegebenenfalls auch als Kontrolleinheit zur Kontrolle der Bewegung des Bewegungselementes ausgebildet sein.It is conceivable to retrofit an existing security device or an existing locking device by merely incorporating an evaluation unit according to the invention for evaluating sensors for generating a shutdown signal. The existing securing device or the existing closing device can thus become an embodiment of the invention. If necessary, the evaluation unit can also be designed as a control unit for checking the movement of the movement element.

Ausführungsbeispiel:Embodiment:

Ein Ausführungsbeispiel der Erfindung ist in den Zeichnungen dargestellt und wird nachstehend in der Angabe weiterer Einzelheiten und Vorteile näher erläutert.An embodiment of the invention is illustrated in the drawings and is explained in more detail below in the specification of further details and advantages.

Im Einzelnen zeigen:

Figur 1
eine Schließvorrichtung gemäß der Erfindung,
Figur 2
eine Vergleichstabelle für eine Sicherungsvorrichtung gemäß der Erfindung,
Figur 3
eine Vergleichstabelle für eine Sicherungsvorrichtung gemäß der Erfindung, welche den Fall einer Entgleisung berücksichtigt, sowie
Figur 4
eine Vergleichstabelle für eine Sicherungsvorrichtung gemäß der Erfindung, die für den Fall eines Teleskoptors vorgesehen ist.
In detail show:
FIG. 1
a locking device according to the invention,
FIG. 2
a comparison table for a security device according to the invention,
FIG. 3
a comparison table for a safety device according to the invention, which takes into account the case of a derailment, as well as
FIG. 4
a comparison table for a securing device according to the invention, which is provided in the case of a telescope optics.

Figur 1 zeigt eine Schließvorrichtung 1 mit einem Tor 2, dass aus einzelnen Torelementen 2a, 2b und 2c besteht. Das Tor zwei bzw. die einzelnen Elemente 2a, 2b, 2c sind in Führungsschienen 3 geführt. In der Führung der Führungsschienen 3 befinden sich Lichtschranken 4a, 4b, 4c, 4d, 4e, wobei deren einzelne optische Pfande als gestrichelte Linien dargestellt sind. In der Zeichnung befinden sich in der linken Führungsschiene der Führung 3 die Sender der Lichtschranken 4a bis 4e und in der rechten Führungsschiene die entsprechenden Empfänger. Die Bewegungsrichtung beim Schließen des Tores 2 ist durch einen Pfeil 5 dargestellt. Die Bewegung des Tores 2 erfolgt durch einen Antriebsmotor M, der wiederum von einer Kontrolleinheit K gesteuert bzw. geregelt wird. Die einzelnen Empfänger der Lichtschranken 4a bis 4e sind über die entsprechenden Leitungen 6a, 6b, 6c, 6d, 6e mit der Kontrolleinheit K verbunden. Der Ausgang der Kontrolleinheit K ist wiederum mit dem Motor M verbunden, der über diesen Ausgang 7 gesteuert bzw. geregelt wird. FIG. 1 shows a closing device 1 with a gate 2, which consists of individual gate elements 2a, 2b and 2c. The gate two or the individual elements 2a, 2b, 2c are guided in guide rails 3. In the guide of the guide rails 3 are light barriers 4a, 4b, 4c, 4d, 4e, wherein the individual optical Pfande are shown as dashed lines. In the drawing are in the left guide rail of the guide 3, the transmitter of the light barriers 4a to 4e and in the right guide rail, the corresponding receiver. The direction of movement when closing the door 2 is shown by an arrow 5. The movement of the gate 2 is carried out by a drive motor M, which in turn is controlled or regulated by a control unit K. The individual receivers of the light barriers 4a to 4e are connected to the control unit K via the corresponding lines 6a, 6b, 6c, 6d, 6e. The output of the control unit K is in turn connected to the motor M, which is controlled or regulated via this output 7.

Die Schließebene, in der sich das Tor 2 zwischen den beiden Führungsschienen der Führung 3 bewegt, ist mit dem Bezugszeichen 8 gekennzeichnet. In dieser Ebene bzw. im Bewegungsraum des Tores 2 befindet sich gegenwärtig in der Figur 1 eine Person 9. Diese Person 9 unterbricht die Lichtschranken 4c, 4d und 4e. Die Lichtschranken 4a und 4b sind nicht unterbrochen.The closing plane in which the door 2 moves between the two guide rails of the guide 3 is identified by the reference numeral 8. In this level or in the movement space of the gate 2 is currently in the FIG. 1 a person 9. This person 9 interrupts the photocells 4c, 4d and 4e. The light barriers 4a and 4b are not interrupted.

In Figur 2 ist eine entsprechende Vergleichstabelle dargestellt. Hier sind sechs Lichtschranken vorhanden, die durch die Variable n Bewegungsrichtung des Tores abgezählt werden. Wird die Lichtschranke nicht unterbrochen (gekennzeichnet durch das Symbol "o" in der Spalte "Status"), wird jeder dieser Lichtschranken der Wert xn = 0 zugeordnet. Wird eine der Lichtschranken unterbrochen (gekennzeichnet durch das Symbol "---" in der Spalte "Status"), so wird dieser unterbrochenen n-ten Lichtschranke der Wert xn = 2n-1 zugeordnet, dass heißt der ersten wird der Wert 1 im Unterbrechungsfall zugeordnet, der zweiten der Wert 2, der dritten der Wert 4, der vierten der Wert 8, der fünften der Wert 16 und der sechsten 32. Wird bei geöffnetem Zustand das Tor in Bewegung gesetzt, so unterbricht es zunächst die erste, dann die zweite, dann die dritte Lichtschranke usw.In FIG. 2 a corresponding comparison table is shown. Here are six photoelectric sensors available, the be counted by the variable n direction of movement of the gate. If the photocell is not interrupted (indicated by the "o" symbol in the "Status" column), each of these photocells is assigned the value x n = 0. If one of the light barriers is interrupted (indicated by the symbol "---" in the "Status" column), then the value of this broken nth light barrier is assigned the value x n = 2 n-1 , ie the first value becomes 1 in the event of an interruption, the second value 2, the third the value 4, the fourth the value 8, the fifth the value 16 and the sixth 32. If the gate is set in motion in the open state, it first interrupts the first, then the second, then the third light barrier etc.

Fall I (vgl. Spalte 3 - 4 in Figur 2): Es sind drei Lichtschranken unterbrochen; vorliegend werden der ersten Lichtschranke der Wert 1, der zweiten Lichtschranke der Wert 2, der dritten Lichtschranke der Wert 4 zugeordnet. Den restlichen Lichtschranken wird jeweils der Wert 0 zugeordnet. Da im vorliegenden Ausführungsbeispiel als mathematische Operation eine Addition vorgesehen ist, ergibt sich im Fall 1 als Ergebniswert (Summe) der Wert 7. In der vergleichstabelle ist der Wert 7 enthalten, da die Vergleichstabelle alle Werte enthält, die gebildet werden können, wenn der Reihe nach 1 bis maximal N Lichtschranken unterbrochen ist/sind. Die Vergleichstabelle enthält also die Werte 1, 3, 7, 15, 31, 63. Der Ergebniswert 7 bedeutet, dass die ersten drei Lichtschranken unterbrochen sind.Case I (see columns 3 - 4 in FIG. 2 ): There are three light barriers interrupted; In the present case, the value 1 is assigned to the first light barrier, the value 2 to the second light barrier, and the value 4 to the third light barrier. The remaining photocells are each assigned the value 0. In the present embodiment, since addition is provided as a mathematical operation, in case 1, the result value (sum) is 7. In the comparison table, the value 7 is included because the comparison table contains all the values that can be formed when the series after 1 to a maximum of N light barriers is interrupted / are. The comparison table thus contains the values 1, 3, 7, 15, 31, 63. The result value 7 means that the first three light barriers are interrupted.

Fall II (vgl. Spalte 5 - 6 in Figur 2): Durch eine andere Konstellation, insbesondere ein eingedrungenes Objekt, kann dieser Wert grundsätzlich nicht entstehen. Der Fall II zeigt, dass die Lichtschranken 1, 2, 3 und 5 unterbrochen sind. Dieser Fall II kann einer Bewegung des Tores nicht entsprechen, weil das Tor ansonsten im Bereich der vierten Lichtschranke eine Unterbrechung aufweisen müsste, welche den Lichtstrahl der Lichtschranke passieren lassen müsste. Die Unterbrechung der fünften Lichtschranke erfolgt daher durch ein Objekt, das eine Kollision hervorrufen kann und somit muss die Kontrolleinheit die Bewegung des Tores stoppen. Mathematisch gesehen ergibt sich der Ergebniswert 23, der in der Vergleichstabelle nicht enthalten ist. Dieser führt den entsprechend zu einer Unterbrechung. Da diese Abbildung in vorteilhafter Weise bijektiv ist, kann eindeutig den Ergebniswerten ein entsprechender Zustand zugeordnet werden. Die Kontrolleinheit kann also daraus schließen, ob eine Unterbrechung notwendig ist oder nicht.Case II (see columns 5 - 6 in FIG. 2 ): By a different constellation, in particular an invaded object, this value can not arise in principle. Case II shows that the photocells 1, 2, 3 and 5 are interrupted. This case II can not correspond to a movement of the gate, because otherwise the gate would have to have an interruption in the area of the fourth light barrier, which would have to allow the light beam of the light barrier to pass. The interruption of the fifth light barrier is therefore carried out an object that can cause a collision and thus the control unit must stop the movement of the door. Mathematically, the result is 23, which is not included in the comparison table. This leads to a corresponding interruption. Since this mapping is advantageously bijective, a corresponding state can be clearly assigned to the result values. The control unit can thus infer whether an interruption is necessary or not.

Das vorliegende Ausführungsbeispiel kann noch einmal dadurch verbessert werden, dass ein Zeitgeber mitläuft. Beispielsweise könnte es sein, dass im vorliegenden Beispiel das Tor tatsächlich die Lichtschranken 1 und 2 passiert hat und die restlichen Lichtschranken eigentlich geöffnet sein müssten. Dringt ein Objekt allerdings so in den Bewegungsraum des Tores ein, dass die nächstfolgende, also die dritte Lichtschranke unterbrochen wird, so würde die Kontrolleinheit dementsprechend dieses Eindringen auch als Bewegung des Tores interpretieren, weil sich insgesamt der Wert 7 ergibt, der ebenfalls in der Vergleichstabelle enthalten ist. Läuft allerdings der Zeitgeber mit, so kann eine Zeitkorrelation erfolgen, dass heißt zu diesem Zeitpunkt der Bewegung des Tores kann der Wert 7 noch nicht erreicht sein, sondern lediglich der Wert 1 + 2 = 3. Dementsprechend kann die Kontrolleinheit die Bewegung des Tores stoppen.The present embodiment can be further improved by running a timer. For example, it could be that in the present example, the gate has actually passed the photocells 1 and 2 and the remaining photocells should actually be open. However, if an object penetrates into the movement space of the gate in such a way that the next, ie the third, light barrier is interrupted, the control unit would accordingly interpret this intrusion as movement of the gate because the total value is 7, which is also shown in the comparison table is included. If, however, the timer runs along, then a time correlation can take place, ie at this time of movement of the gate, the value 7 can not yet be reached, but only the value 1 + 2 = 3. Accordingly, the control unit can stop the movement of the gate.

Figur 3 zeigt ein Ausführungsbeispiel, bei dem ein sogenannter "Blow-out-Effekt" stattfindet. Dies kann insbesondere bei sogenannten Folientoren der Fall sein. Derartige Folientore sind so geführt, dass bei einem entsprechenden Windstoß bzw. einer Böe, die zu einer Beschädigung des Tores in Folge der großen Krafteinwirkung gegen das Tor führen könnte, dass das Tor an der entsprechenden Stelle, an der die Krafteinwirkung zu groß ist, aus der Führung herausrutscht. Die Kraft wird dadurch reduziert, und es kommt zu keiner Beschädigung des Tores. Die vorliegende Ausführungsform ermöglicht es, zu unterscheiden, ob ein Objekt in den Bewegungsraum eingedrungen ist, oder ob ein solcher sogenannter "Blow-out-Effekt" stattgefunden hat. Dabei wird die Zeit durch einen Zeitgeber mitverfolgt. Die ersten beiden Spalten der Tabelle zeigen einen Fall, bei dem das Tor die ersten drei Lichtschranken passiert hat, und zwar zum Zeitpunkt t-1. Als Ergebniswert wird korrekt zum Zeitpunkt t-1 der Wert 7 (Summe) angeführt, der in der Vergleichstabelle enthalten ist. Hat zum Zeitpunkt t der Ergebniswert immer noch den Wert 7, so bedeutet das, dass das Tor angehalten wurde. FIG. 3 shows an embodiment in which a so-called "blow-out effect" takes place. This may be the case in particular with so-called film doors. Such film doors are guided so that at a corresponding gust of wind or a gust, which could lead to damage to the gate as a result of the large force against the gate, that the gate at the corresponding point at which the force is too large, from the leadership slips out. The force is reduced, and there is no damage to the gate. The present embodiment makes it possible to distinguish whether an object has entered the movement space or whether such a so-called "blow-out effect" took place. The time is tracked by a timer. The first two columns of the table show a case in which the gate has passed the first three light barriers, at time t-1. As a result, the value 7 (sum) contained in the comparison table is correctly stated at time t-1. If the result value still has the value 7 at time t, this means that the gate has been stopped.

Fall I (in Figur 3): Wird das Tor weiter bewegt, so passiert es bis zum Zeitpunkt t auch die vierte Lichtschranke und nimmt somit korrekt den Wert 15 an, der ebenfalls in der Vergleichstabelle enthalten ist und auch für den Zeitpunkt t vorgesehen ist. Die Kontrolleinheit erkennt also, dass das Tor sich abwärts bewegt.Case I (in FIG. 3 ): If the gate is moved further, it also passes until the time t, the fourth light barrier and thus correctly assumes the value 15, which is also included in the comparison table and is also provided for the time t. The control unit thus recognizes that the gate is moving downwards.

Fall II (in Figur 3): Im Fall II hat sich das Tor nicht weiter bewegt, nachdem es die dritte Lichtschranke passiert hat, sondern es ist ein Objekt eingedrungen, dass die fünfte Lichtschranke passiert. Hätte sich das Tor weiter bewegt, so wäre zum Zeitpunkt t wie bereits im ersten Fall angesprochen der Ergebniswert 15 zu erwarten gewesen. Durch Unterbrechung der Lichtschranke 5 allerdings liegt nun der Wert 23 (Summe) als Ergebniswert vor. Dieser ist größer als der zu erwartende Ergebniswert und bedeutet daher eine Unterbrechung durch ein Objekt. Das Tor muss angehalten werden.Case II (in FIG. 3 ): In case II, the gate did not move further after passing the third light barrier, but an object has penetrated that the fifth light barrier passes. If the gate had moved further, the result value 15 would have been expected at time t, as already mentioned in the first case. By interrupting the light barrier 5, however, the value 23 (sum) is now available as a result value. This is greater than the expected result value and therefore means an interruption by an object. The gate must be stopped.

Fall III (in Figur 3): Der Fall III zeigt einen "Blow-out"-Fall an. Das Tor hat sich bewegt und mittlerweile die vierte Lichtschranke passiert. Der Ergebniswert beträgt allerdings nicht 15, wie es bei regulärem Betrieb der Fall wäre, sondern lediglich 13, da ein Windstoß die Führung im Bereich der zweiten Lichtschranke ausgehebelt hat (sog. "blow-out"). Die Lichtschranke 2 ist daher nicht mehr unterbrochen. Bei einem derartigen Fall kann es sich somit zum Zeitpunkt t zumindest nicht mehr um eine Unterbrechung einer Lichtschranke durch ein Objekt handeln. Es wird eine Lichtschranke wieder in Gang gesetzt, die bereits durch das Tor unterbrochen worden ist und somit grundsätzlich weiterhin unterbrochen sein sollte. Daher ist die Summe kleiner als der zu erwartende Ergebniswert, nämlich der Sollwert 15.Case III (in FIG. 3 ): Case III indicates a "blow-out" case. The gate has moved and meanwhile the fourth light barrier has happened. However, the result value is not 15, as would be the case with regular operation, but only 13, since a gust of wind has spoiled the guidance in the area of the second light barrier (so-called "blow-out"). The light barrier 2 is therefore no longer interrupted. In such a case, it may therefore no longer be an interruption of a light barrier by an object at the time t. A light barrier is set in motion again, which has already been interrupted by the gate and thus should basically continue to be interrupted. Therefore If the sum is smaller than the expected result value, namely the desired value 15.

Figur 4 zeigt eine Tabelle, bei der ein Teleskop-Tor eine Bewegung ausführt. Insgesamt sind acht Lichtschranken vorhanden. Jede Spalte zeigt einen anderen Bewegungszeitpunkt des Tores, und zwar zu den aufeinander folgenden Zeitpunkten t = 1, 2, ..., 8. Die erste Spalte (t = 1) zeigt einen vollkommen geöffneten Zustand. Setzt sich das Tor in Bewegung wird zunächst der erste (bei t = 2), zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt t = 3 die erste und zweite Lichtschranke, dann bei t= 4 die erste, zweite und dritte Lichtschranke, bei t = 5 die erste bis vierte Lichtschranke unterbrochen. Ab diesem Zeitpunkt wird dann zwar auch die nächste, die fünfte Lichtschranke unterbrochen (t = 6). Die erste Lichtschranke wird allerdings bei t = 6 wieder geöffnet, da das entsprechende Element aus dem Bereich der ersten Lichtschranke ausschwenkt. Anschließend wird zusätzlich zur ersten im weiteren Verlauf der Bewegung auch die zweite Lichtschranke geöffnet (t = 7). Die Vergleichstabelle ist demnach so gestaltet, dass je nach verstrichener Zeit während der Bewegung des Tores somit zunächst, im Fall gemäß Figur 2 die Vergleichstabelle die Werte 0, 1, 3, 7 und 15 annehmen kann. Anschließend nimmt jedoch Vergleichstabelle nicht dem Wert 31 sondern den Wert 30 an, da die erste Lichtschranke wieder geöffnet wird. Der nächste Wert ist der Wert 60, da die erste und zweite Lichtschranke geöffnet wird, also 63 - 1 - 2. Dementsprechend lautet der nächste Wert der Vergleichstabelle 120. Bei einem Abweichen von diesen Werten zu den entsprechenden Zeitpunkten bedeutet dies, dass entweder ein Objekt eingedrungen ist, was dann der Fall ist, wenn die Ergebniswerte größer als die Sollwerte der Vergleichstabelle sind zu den entsprechenden Zeitpunkten. Grundsätzlich könnte es sich, wenn die Zeitinformation nicht vorliegen würde, auch um einen sogenannten "Blow-out-Fall" handeln, wenn der Wert kleiner ist als der Sollwert. FIG. 4 shows a table in which a telescopic gate performs a movement. In total there are eight photocells. Each column shows a different moment of movement of the gate at successive times t = 1, 2, ..., 8. The first column (t = 1) shows a fully opened state. If the gate starts to move, first the first (at t = 2), at a later time t = 3 the first and second light barrier, then at t = 4 the first, second and third light barrier, at t = 5 the first to fourth photocell interrupted. From then on, the next, the fifth photocell will be interrupted (t = 6). However, the first light barrier is opened again at t = 6, since the corresponding element swings out of the area of the first light barrier. Subsequently, in addition to the first in the further course of the movement, the second light barrier is also opened (t = 7). The comparison table is therefore designed so that, depending on elapsed time during the movement of the gate thus initially, in the case according to FIG. 2 the comparison table can take the values 0, 1, 3, 7 and 15. Subsequently, however, the comparison table does not assume the value 31 but the value 30, since the first light barrier is opened again. The next value is 60 because the first and second photocells are opened, that is, 63 - 1 - 2. Accordingly, the next value of the comparison table is 120. If these values deviate at the appropriate times, this means that either one object has penetrated, which is the case when the result values are greater than the reference values of the comparison table at the respective times. In principle, if the time information were not available, it could also be a so-called "blow-out case" if the value is smaller than the setpoint value.

Bezugszeichenliste:LIST OF REFERENCE NUMBERS

11
Schließvorrichtungclosing device
22
Torgate
2a2a
Torelementgate element
2b2 B
Torelementgate element
2c2c
Torelementgate element
33
Führungguide
4a4a
Lichtschrankephotocell
4b4b
Lichtschrankephotocell
4c4c
Lichtschrankephotocell
4d4d
Lichtschrankephotocell
4e4e
Lichtschrankephotocell
55
Bewegungsrichtungmovement direction
6a6a
Signalleitungsignal line
6b6b
Signalleitungsignal line
6c6c
Signalleitungsignal line
6d6d
Signalleitungsignal line
6e6e
Signalleitungsignal line
77
Steuerleitungcontrol line
88th
Bewegungsebenemovement plane
99
Objekt / PersonObject / person
KK
Kontrolleinheitcontrol unit
MM
Motorengine

Claims (15)

  1. Safety device for safeguarding a movable, guided movement element against undesired collisions with an object (9) lying on a movement path of the movement element (2, 2a, 2b, 2c), said device comprising at least two sensors (4a, 4b, 4c, 4d, 4e) for detecting the object and the movement element and for outputting signals as a function of the detection, and an evaluation unit (K) for evaluating signals of the sensors and for generating a switch-off signal on the basis of the evaluation, characterised in that the evaluation unit is configured to acquire from the at least two sensors a currently detected state vector (6a, 6b, 6c, 6d, 6e) from a set of state vectors which clearly comprise all possible combinations of the signals of the sensors, and to generate the switch-off signal (7) in the case of predetermined state vectors.
  2. Safety device according to claim 1, characterised in that the evaluation unit is configured, from a set of state vectors, which comprise the signals of the respective sensors individually as a function of their position, to assign to each state vector clearly exactly one piece of state position from a predetermined target amount by means of bijective mapping and in the case of predetermined state information to generate the switch-off signal.
  3. Safety device according to one of the preceding claims, characterised in that the evaluation unit is configured:
    - to assign to the sensors respectively a numerical value as a function of their position and their signal and to create the state vector from these numerical values, and
    - to carry out the bijective mapping as a mathematical operation of the numerical values, in particular as addition, so that a corresponding result value is obtained as state information,
    wherein a storage unit is provided in which a comparison table with comparison numbers corresponding to the predetermined state vectors can be stored, and wherein the evaluation unit is configured to compare the determined result value with the comparison numbers of the comparison table and to generate the switch-off signal as a function thereof, wherein the evaluation unit is preferably designed to assign the numerical value zero to each of the sensors if the sensor is not interrupted, and to carry out the assignment of the numerical value as a function of the respective sensor in the case of a total of N sensors, (N ≥ 2, N; natural number) according to what position the sensor has within the arrangement of N sensors, wherein the evaluation unit is configured in particular to assign the numerical value 2n-1 (2 to the power (n-1)) to the n-th (n = 1, 2, ...N) sensor within the arrangement of sensors.
  4. Safety device according to one of the preceding claims, characterised in that the evaluation unit is configured to use predetermined state vectors and to compare a currently detected state vector with the predetermined state vectors and to generate the switch-off signal in the case of predetermined state vectors.
  5. Safety device according to one of the preceding claims, characterised in that the evaluation unit is configured to save at least temporarily at least one state vector determined before the currently detected state vector and to compare it with the currently detected state vector.
  6. Safety device according to one of the preceding claims, characterised in that a timer is provided which can be activated at the beginning of the movement of the movement element and can be stopped when the movement of the movement element stops, wherein the timer is configured to communicate a time value to the evaluation unit.
  7. Safety device according to one of the preceding claims, characterised in that the evaluation unit is configured to determine the state vectors predetermined for the generation of the switch-off signal on the basis of the time value.
  8. Safety device according to one of the preceding claims, characterised in that the evaluation unit is configured to assign in addition to the signals and/or to the result values a time value which corresponds to the moment of detection, wherein the evaluation unit comprises a timer, which can be activated at the beginning of the movement of the movement element and can be stopped when the movement of the movement element stops, so that the timer measures the elapsed time of the movement of the movement element, and wherein the evaluation unit is configured to calculate on the basis of the time value a desired value which would result from the signals of the sensors interrupted during regular operation, and to compare the result value with the desired value and generate the switch-off signal as a function of this.
  9. Safety device according to one of the preceding claims, characterised in that the sensor is configured as a beam barrier, in particular as an interruption light barrier or as a reflection light barrier or as a time of flight (TOF) sensor.
  10. Safety device according to one of the preceding claims, characterised in that the sensors are arranged parallel to the movement direction (5) of the movement element (2) and/or in the movement plane (8) of the movement element (2).
  11. Safety device according to one of the preceding claims, characterised in that the sensors are oriented perpendicular to the movement direction (5) of the movement element (2).
  12. Safety device according to one of the preceding claims, characterised in that the evaluation unit is configured to interrupt the movement of the movement element when the switch-off signal is present.
  13. Safety device according to one of the preceding claims, characterised in that the evaluation unit is configured to carry out the comparison with the comparison table repeatedly during the movement of the movement element.
  14. Closing device (1) comprising a movable, guided movement element and a safety device according to one of the preceding claims, wherein at least one of the sensors is arranged in such a way that it can detect the movement element during the movement thereof.
  15. Evaluation unit for evaluating sensors of a safety device and for generating a switch-off signal for switching off the drive of the movement element, wherein the evaluation unit and the safety device are configured according to one of the preceding claims.
EP11008656.8A 2011-10-28 2011-10-28 Safety device, closing device and evaluation unit Active EP2586959B2 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/284,005 US8988213B2 (en) 2011-10-28 2011-10-28 Safety device, closing device and evaluation unit
DK11008656.8T DK2586959T4 (en) 2011-10-28 2011-10-28 Safety device, closure and evaluation unit
EP11008656.8A EP2586959B2 (en) 2011-10-28 2011-10-28 Safety device, closing device and evaluation unit
CN201210548388.XA CN103089109B (en) 2011-10-28 2012-10-26 Safety device, shutoff device and assessment unit

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP11008656.8A EP2586959B2 (en) 2011-10-28 2011-10-28 Safety device, closing device and evaluation unit

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2586959A1 EP2586959A1 (en) 2013-05-01
EP2586959B1 true EP2586959B1 (en) 2013-12-25
EP2586959B2 EP2586959B2 (en) 2016-09-14

Family

ID=45065575

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP11008656.8A Active EP2586959B2 (en) 2011-10-28 2011-10-28 Safety device, closing device and evaluation unit

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US8988213B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2586959B2 (en)
CN (1) CN103089109B (en)
DK (1) DK2586959T4 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3530869A1 (en) 2018-02-27 2019-08-28 Cedes AG Light grid with distance information and use thereof

Families Citing this family (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2506034B1 (en) * 2011-04-01 2013-05-29 Cedes AG Sensor device, safety device, door and method for controlling its movement
DK2845985T3 (en) 2013-07-18 2016-02-29 Cedes Ag Port Security System
CN106461775B (en) * 2014-04-03 2019-09-03 伊沃夫科技有限公司 Subregion for radar system
JP2015214794A (en) * 2014-05-08 2015-12-03 文化シヤッター株式会社 Opening/closing body stop device of opening/closing device
CN104453681A (en) * 2014-11-19 2015-03-25 无锡悟莘科技有限公司 Door curtain rotation control method based on induction
JP6421043B2 (en) * 2015-01-16 2018-11-07 文化シヤッター株式会社 Switchgear
DE102015101017B4 (en) * 2015-01-23 2018-02-22 Efaflex Tor- Und Sicherheitssysteme Gmbh & Co. Kg Method for controlling a gate assembly and such gate assembly and a safety device therefor
US10619397B2 (en) * 2015-09-14 2020-04-14 Rytec Corporation System and method for safety management in roll-up doors
US20220228420A1 (en) * 2015-09-14 2022-07-21 Rytec Corporation System and method for safety management in roll-up doors
DE102018104314A1 (en) * 2018-02-26 2019-08-29 Marantec Antriebs- Und Steuerungstechnik Gmbh & Co. Kg gate system
DE102018104313A1 (en) * 2018-02-26 2019-08-29 Marantec Antriebs- Und Steuerungstechnik Gmbh & Co. Kg Method for determining the gate position in a gate system
WO2020005080A1 (en) * 2018-06-29 2020-01-02 Turinsky Wilfried Manfred A safety device for use with a panel return and an edgebander
US11346141B2 (en) 2018-12-21 2022-05-31 Rytec Corporation Safety system and method for overhead roll-up doors
EP3680814B1 (en) * 2019-01-14 2024-10-09 dormakaba Deutschland GmbH Method for detecting movements and passenger detection system
DE102019131324A1 (en) 2019-06-05 2020-12-10 Eurodoors Production GmbH Gate system with a device for collision detection
US12098582B2 (en) 2019-08-27 2024-09-24 Marantec Antriebs-Und Steuerungstechnik Gmbh & Co. Kg Method for determining a position of a door in a door system

Family Cites Families (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5233185A (en) * 1992-02-28 1993-08-03 Gmi Holdings, Inc. Light beam detector for door openers using fiber optics
CA2155818C (en) * 1994-08-11 1998-09-01 Masahiro Sai Automatic door opening and closing system
DE19604900C2 (en) 1996-02-10 2000-02-03 Hermann Wegener Safety device for hand-operated machine tools, especially for press brakes
DE19739543A1 (en) * 1997-09-09 1999-03-11 Efaflex Inzeniring D O O Ljubl Safety device for motorized gates
DE29901664U1 (en) 1999-02-03 1999-04-15 Samaco GmbH, 77694 Kehl Lift gate with light curtain monitoring device
DE29912572U1 (en) 1999-07-19 1999-09-16 Marantec Antriebs- und Steuerungstechnik GmbH & Co. KG, 33428 Marienfeld Device for opening or closing a gate
GB2353855B (en) * 1999-08-23 2002-02-20 Airdri Ltd Gap scanning
DE10203145C1 (en) 2002-01-28 2003-04-17 Efaflex Tor & Sicherheitssys Automatic door operating device for vertically displaced door uses surveillance system with reflected radiation detector for monitoring areas infront and behind door opening
DE102005003794A1 (en) 2005-01-26 2006-08-03 Cedes Ag Gate, e.g. rolling gate, protecting device, has light barriers between which distance transfers another light barrier in measuring state if gate is in path between another two of barriers and before gate reaches former barrier
US7532709B2 (en) * 2005-02-04 2009-05-12 Styers Justin R Remote garage door monitoring system
CN101405471B (en) * 2006-02-08 2013-07-10 纳博特斯克株式会社 Automatic door unit
DE202006002000U1 (en) * 2006-02-08 2006-04-06 Adolf Seuster Gmbh & Co. Kg Door has light cabinet arrangement and has panel movable along predetermined path between opened and closed positions, cabinet arrangement having several, preferably vertically arranged light cabinets
US8752032B2 (en) * 2007-02-23 2014-06-10 Irdeto Canada Corporation System and method of interlocking to protect software-mediated program and device behaviours
DE102007050334A1 (en) 2007-10-18 2009-04-23 Efaflex Tor- Und Sicherheitssysteme Gmbh & Co. Kg Method and device for controlling a gate moving vertically or horizontally while protecting the gate closing plane against obstacles
DE102008023294B4 (en) * 2008-01-16 2010-02-04 Cedes Ag Securing system for securing a moving, guided movement element against unwanted collisions
EP2226452B1 (en) * 2008-12-12 2014-05-14 Pepperl + Fuchs GmbH Door monitoring sensor
HUE024992T2 (en) 2009-03-17 2016-08-29 Seuster Kg Gate
EP2374985A3 (en) 2010-04-08 2014-10-01 Strack Lift Automation GmbH Motorised door with a safety device

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3530869A1 (en) 2018-02-27 2019-08-28 Cedes AG Light grid with distance information and use thereof

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2586959B2 (en) 2016-09-14
DK2586959T4 (en) 2017-01-09
EP2586959A1 (en) 2013-05-01
US20130106601A1 (en) 2013-05-02
CN103089109A (en) 2013-05-08
US8988213B2 (en) 2015-03-24
DK2586959T3 (en) 2014-03-17
CN103089109B (en) 2016-12-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2586959B1 (en) Safety device, closing device and evaluation unit
EP2506034B1 (en) Sensor device, safety device, door and method for controlling its movement
DE3618692C2 (en)
EP1841942B1 (en) Device for protecting a driven moving element
DE3346366C2 (en) Safety circuit for electric motor-driven window regulators for automobiles or similar vehicles
DE2926938A1 (en) SWITCHING ARRANGEMENT FOR DRIVING A MOVABLE ELEMENT, ESPECIALLY FOR DRIVING DISCS OR THE LIKE. IN MOTOR VEHICLES
DE102010017398B3 (en) Method for operating gate i.e. rolling gate in building, involves releasing signals during interruption of light lines of danger area and protection area, respectively, and releasing different action by gate controller based on signals
DE102006008513A1 (en) Sensor-monitoring device for motor driven wing of automatic door, has evaluation circuit provided for control and/or evaluation of detection signal, and sensors with overlapping area with reference to monitoring area
DE102008044990A1 (en) Method for controlling or monitoring drivable wing, particularly in form of rotating wing, sliding door wing, wing of folding door and window, involves projecting predetermined space element or opening wing in monitoring and releasing area
DE102016101487A1 (en) Vehicle window opening device
EP2799384A1 (en) Motor-driven door with a safety device
DE102010014806B4 (en) Door drive device, thus provided building closure, door system and manufacturing and drive method
EP0678649A1 (en) Roller shutter with controlling device
DE69719000T2 (en) Blocked door scanning in an elevator system
DE102019126718A1 (en) DEVICE FOR FIXED BUILDING INSTALLATION WITH AT LEAST ONE AUTOMATICALLY MOVABLE LEAF ELEMENT AND PROCEDURE FOR IT
DE102016211054A1 (en) Collision protection method for a motor-driven motor vehicle part and associated device
EP2204891A1 (en) Actuating drive of a motor vehicle component and method for operating such an actuating drive
DE102020201343A1 (en) Method for adjusting a vehicle part and associated adjusting device
EP2845985B1 (en) Gate securing system
EP0446651A2 (en) Electro-pneumatic actioning system for passenger vehicle door
EP2694766B1 (en) Method for controlling a door drive
DE102011102232A1 (en) Light grid for use in gate controller for monitoring slalom pathways, has evaluation unit including frame function that differentiates interruption of optical paths by gate leaf from interruption of paths by obstacle during assembling grid
EP1048812B1 (en) Method to normalize the position of the window pane of an externally powered vehicle window regulator
WO2021037345A1 (en) Method for determining the door position in a door system
DE102011102963A1 (en) Automatic door system e.g. double-leaves sliding door system commissioning method, involves performing calibration of sensors in opened and closed positions while processing door system in opened and closed positions

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20111028

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20130829

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 646769

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20140115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502011001862

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140220

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: KELLER AND PARTNER PATENTANWAELTE AG, CH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

Effective date: 20140314

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140325

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131225

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131225

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131225

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131225

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131225

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131225

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131225

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140425

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131225

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131225

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140428

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131225

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131225

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131225

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 502011001862

Country of ref document: DE

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: SICK AG

Effective date: 20140919

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131225

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 502011001862

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140919

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PCAR

Free format text: NEW ADDRESS: EIGERSTRASSE 2 POSTFACH, 3000 BERN 14 (CH)

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131225

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20141028

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131225

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20150630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141028

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20151021

Year of fee payment: 5

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20151021

Year of fee payment: 5

RIC2 Information provided on ipc code assigned after grant

Ipc: E06B 9/68 20060101ALI20160122BHEP

Ipc: E06B 9/88 20060101AFI20160122BHEP

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131225

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20151028

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131225

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140326

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131225

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131225

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20111028

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151028

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131225

PUAH Patent maintained in amended form

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED

27A Patent maintained in amended form

Effective date: 20160914

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B2

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R102

Ref document number: 502011001862

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: AELC

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T4

Effective date: 20170104

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20131225

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131225

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161031

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 646769

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20161028

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161028

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131225

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131225

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230519

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20231025

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20231018

Year of fee payment: 13