CA2252524A1 - Pluripotent rabbit embryonic stem (es) cell lines and their use in the generation of chimeric rabbits - Google Patents
Pluripotent rabbit embryonic stem (es) cell lines and their use in the generation of chimeric rabbits Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2252524A1 CA2252524A1 CA002252524A CA2252524A CA2252524A1 CA 2252524 A1 CA2252524 A1 CA 2252524A1 CA 002252524 A CA002252524 A CA 002252524A CA 2252524 A CA2252524 A CA 2252524A CA 2252524 A1 CA2252524 A1 CA 2252524A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- cells
- rabbit
- embryonic stem
- medium
- cell lines
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 241000283973 Oryctolagus cuniculus Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 76
- 210000002459 blastocyst Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 44
- 238000012258 culturing Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 172
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 claims description 23
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 claims description 23
- 239000002609 medium Substances 0.000 claims description 20
- 102000002260 Alkaline Phosphatase Human genes 0.000 claims description 17
- 108020004774 Alkaline Phosphatase Proteins 0.000 claims description 17
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 14
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000010186 staining Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- JGSARLDLIJGVTE-MBNYWOFBSA-N Penicillin G Chemical compound N([C@H]1[C@H]2SC([C@@H](N2C1=O)C(O)=O)(C)C)C(=O)CC1=CC=CC=C1 JGSARLDLIJGVTE-MBNYWOFBSA-N 0.000 claims description 10
- 210000001161 mammalian embryo Anatomy 0.000 claims description 10
- DGVVWUTYPXICAM-UHFFFAOYSA-N β‐Mercaptoethanol Chemical compound OCCS DGVVWUTYPXICAM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 10
- 241001529936 Murinae Species 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000002744 homologous recombination Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000006801 homologous recombination Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 108091003079 Bovine Serum Albumin Proteins 0.000 claims description 7
- 102000004058 Leukemia inhibitory factor Human genes 0.000 claims description 7
- 108090000581 Leukemia inhibitory factor Proteins 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000010558 Gene Alterations Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- LOKCTEFSRHRXRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-I dipotassium trisodium dihydrogen phosphate hydrogen phosphate dichloride Chemical compound P(=O)(O)(O)[O-].[K+].P(=O)(O)([O-])[O-].[Na+].[Na+].[Cl-].[K+].[Cl-].[Na+] LOKCTEFSRHRXRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-I 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000002953 phosphate buffered saline Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- WEEMDRWIKYCTQM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2,6-dimethoxybenzenecarbothioamide Chemical compound COC1=CC=CC(OC)=C1C(N)=S WEEMDRWIKYCTQM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- 101001011741 Bos taurus Insulin Proteins 0.000 claims description 5
- 102000029816 Collagenase Human genes 0.000 claims description 5
- 108060005980 Collagenase Proteins 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000006144 Dulbecco’s modified Eagle's medium Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 241000287828 Gallus gallus Species 0.000 claims description 5
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N Glucose Natural products OC[C@H]1OC(O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-VKHMYHEASA-N L-glutamine Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCC(N)=O ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-VKHMYHEASA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- 229930182816 L-glutamine Natural products 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000004107 Penicillin G sodium Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- IXIBAKNTJSCKJM-BUBXBXGNSA-N bovine insulin Chemical compound C([C@@H](C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@H]1CSSC[C@H]2C(=O)N[C@@H](C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CO)C(=O)N[C@H](C(=O)N[C@H](C(N[C@@H](CO)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC=3C=CC(O)=CC=3)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(N)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(O)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(N)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC=3C=CC(O)=CC=3)C(=O)N[C@@H](CSSC[C@H](NC(=O)[C@H](C(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](CC=3C=CC(O)=CC=3)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](C)NC(=O)[C@H](CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](C(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](CC=3NC=NC=3)NC(=O)[C@H](CO)NC(=O)CNC1=O)C(=O)NCC(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(O)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)NCC(=O)N[C@@H](CC=1C=CC=CC=1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC=1C=CC=CC=1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC=1C=CC(O)=CC=1)C(=O)N[C@@H]([C@@H](C)O)C(=O)N1[C@@H](CCC1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCCN)C(=O)N[C@@H](C)C(O)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(N)=O)C(O)=O)=O)CSSC[C@@H](C(N2)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](C(C)C)NC(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)CN)[C@@H](C)CC)C(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)[C@@H](N)CC=1C=CC=CC=1)C(C)C)C1=CN=CN1 IXIBAKNTJSCKJM-BUBXBXGNSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- 229960002424 collagenase Drugs 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000003797 essential amino acid Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 235000020776 essential amino acid Nutrition 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000012091 fetal bovine serum Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 210000004602 germ cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000008103 glucose Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 235000019369 penicillin G sodium Nutrition 0.000 claims description 5
- 229940056360 penicillin g Drugs 0.000 claims description 5
- 210000002966 serum Anatomy 0.000 claims description 5
- 229960002385 streptomycin sulfate Drugs 0.000 claims description 5
- 102000013127 Vimentin Human genes 0.000 claims description 3
- 108010065472 Vimentin Proteins 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000002776 aggregation Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000004220 aggregation Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000024245 cell differentiation Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 210000005048 vimentin Anatomy 0.000 claims description 3
- 102100033421 Keratin, type I cytoskeletal 18 Human genes 0.000 claims description 2
- 108010066327 Keratin-18 Proteins 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000005757 colony formation Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000009795 derivation Methods 0.000 abstract description 13
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 abstract description 5
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 241000699666 Mus <mouse, genus> Species 0.000 description 18
- 210000002257 embryonic structure Anatomy 0.000 description 15
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 11
- 210000001671 embryonic stem cell Anatomy 0.000 description 9
- 210000002950 fibroblast Anatomy 0.000 description 9
- 230000004069 differentiation Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000004113 cell culture Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 5
- 241000699670 Mus sp. Species 0.000 description 4
- 241000700159 Rattus Species 0.000 description 4
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 210000004952 blastocoel Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 241000283690 Bos taurus Species 0.000 description 3
- 238000010171 animal model Methods 0.000 description 3
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 210000002308 embryonic cell Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 208000001608 teratocarcinoma Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 210000000143 trophectoderm cell Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 206010068051 Chimerism Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 108010058936 Cohn fraction V Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 241000699800 Cricetinae Species 0.000 description 2
- 239000012591 Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline Substances 0.000 description 2
- 241001494479 Pecora Species 0.000 description 2
- 241000288906 Primates Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001857 anti-mycotic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000002543 antimycotic Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003115 biocidal effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229940098773 bovine serum albumin Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010363 gene targeting Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004077 genetic alteration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 231100000118 genetic alteration Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000000338 in vitro Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010348 incorporation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000013011 mating Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000000472 morula Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000035772 mutation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000009261 transgenic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002054 transplantation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 241000700112 Chinchilla Species 0.000 description 1
- 108010044467 Isoenzymes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000011782 Keratins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010076876 Keratins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- YQEZLKZALYSWHR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ketamine Chemical compound C=1C=CC=C(Cl)C=1C1(NC)CCCCC1=O YQEZLKZALYSWHR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 208000035752 Live birth Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 229930192392 Mitomycin Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 101000803350 Mus musculus Vimentin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- NWIBSHFKIJFRCO-WUDYKRTCSA-N Mytomycin Chemical compound C1N2C(C(C(C)=C(N)C3=O)=O)=C3[C@@H](COC(N)=O)[C@@]2(OC)[C@@H]2[C@H]1N2 NWIBSHFKIJFRCO-WUDYKRTCSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000772415 Neovison vison Species 0.000 description 1
- 102000004160 Phosphoric Monoester Hydrolases Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000608 Phosphoric Monoester Hydrolases Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010059712 Pronase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100028255 Renin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000783 Renin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 208000035199 Tetraploidy Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000005395 beveled glass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000029803 blastocyst development Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009395 breeding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001488 breeding effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007975 buffered saline Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000006143 cell culture medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001086 cytosolic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002354 daily effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003981 ectoderm Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000013020 embryo development Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000032692 embryo implantation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002242 embryoid body Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000001900 endoderm Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000002336 epiblast cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000003237 epithelioid cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000003203 everyday effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011010 flushing procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001415 gene therapy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002695 general anesthesia Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002068 genetic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000001963 growth medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000010196 hermaphroditism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002779 inactivation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229960003299 ketamine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000004777 loss-of-function mutation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003716 mesoderm Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000000386 microscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229960004857 mitomycin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002703 mutagenesis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 231100000350 mutagenesis Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 238000002135 phase contrast microscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013612 plasmid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940047883 porcine follicle stimulating hormone Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 210000005238 principal cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 230000006798 recombination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005215 recombination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000000130 stem cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000007929 subcutaneous injection Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010254 subcutaneous injection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013589 supplement Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002381 testicular Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011800 void material Substances 0.000 description 1
- BPICBUSOMSTKRF-UHFFFAOYSA-N xylazine Chemical compound CC1=CC=CC(C)=C1NC1=NCCCS1 BPICBUSOMSTKRF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960001600 xylazine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 210000004340 zona pellucida Anatomy 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
- C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
- C12N15/87—Introduction of foreign genetic material using processes not otherwise provided for, e.g. co-transformation
- C12N15/873—Techniques for producing new embryos, e.g. nuclear transfer, manipulation of totipotent cells or production of chimeric embryos
- C12N15/877—Techniques for producing new mammalian cloned embryos
- C12N15/8777—Rabbit embryos
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N5/00—Undifferentiated human, animal or plant cells, e.g. cell lines; Tissues; Cultivation or maintenance thereof; Culture media therefor
- C12N5/06—Animal cells or tissues; Human cells or tissues
- C12N5/0602—Vertebrate cells
- C12N5/0603—Embryonic cells ; Embryoid bodies
- C12N5/0606—Pluripotent embryonic cells, e.g. embryonic stem cells [ES]
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2501/00—Active agents used in cell culture processes, e.g. differentation
- C12N2501/20—Cytokines; Chemokines
- C12N2501/23—Interleukins [IL]
- C12N2501/235—Leukemia inhibitory factor [LIF]
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2501/00—Active agents used in cell culture processes, e.g. differentation
- C12N2501/30—Hormones
- C12N2501/33—Insulin
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2502/00—Coculture with; Conditioned medium produced by
- C12N2502/13—Coculture with; Conditioned medium produced by connective tissue cells; generic mesenchyme cells, e.g. so-called "embryonic fibroblasts"
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2509/00—Methods for the dissociation of cells, e.g. specific use of enzymes
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Developmental Biology & Embryology (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Gynecology & Obstetrics (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Reproductive Health (AREA)
- Cell Biology (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Plant Pathology (AREA)
- Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention relates to a rabbit embryonic stem (ES) cell line, comprising at least 70 %, preferably 80 to 90 % undifferentiated cells and obtainable by isolating the inner cell mass of 5.5 days postcoitus blastocysts and culturing them on feeder cells in rabbit ES medium. The invention further relates to further optimization of derivation and maintenance of the cell line and to the use thereof in inter alia generation of chimeric rabbits.
Description
CA 022~2~24 1998-10-22 PLURIPOTENT RABBIT EMBRYONIC STEM (ES) CELL LINES AND
THEIR USE IN THE r,~N~TION OF CHIMERIC RABBITS
The present invention relates to novel rabblt embryonic stem (ES) cell lines and their use in the gene-ration of chimerlc rabbits.
Gene targeting (via homologous recombination in 5 embryonic stem (ES) cells) technology allows the manipulation of the genome in desired and defined ways (Capecchi, 1989; Robertson, 1987; Bradley, 1987).
Briefly, genes to be targeted are incorporated in plasmid transfer vectors and altered by replacement of some of 10 their sequence with foreign DNA which encodes selectable markers (inactivation) or by a mutated gene sequence (targeted mutagenesis). These inactivated or mutated genes are then introduced into ES cells (which each have the potential to develop into a complete animal).
15 Subsequently clones of ES cells in which the natural gene is replaced by the inactivated hybrid are selected ln vitro, and these selected clones are introduced into normal embryos which are reimplanted. This process generates chimeric animals which are selected for 20 germline transmission of the inactivated gene. Through breeding and selection, transgenic animals are then gene-rated which are deficient in the targeted ("knocked-out") gene.
Completely ES cell derived mice can be 25 generated utilising the recently developed technology to aggregate wild type or mutant ES cells with tetraploid embryos (Nagy et al., 1993). Alternatively ES cells can be used for introduction of genetic material by non-homologous recombination, allowing the study of genetic 30 alteration in live animals.
The application of transgenic technologies and ES cell technologies for the alteration of gene function - has provided animal models of important human diseases (for review cfr. Wilson, 1996; Rubin and Barsch, 1996).
35 However, at present this technology has only been CA 022~2S24 1998-10-22 WO97/41209 PCT~P97/02323 successful in the mouse. Although useful for many applications, the mouse has significant restrictions (e.g. size and inability to generate the phenotype of human diseases) that limit its potential applications.
5 Consequently, larger animal models to test the phenotypic consequences or loss-of-function mutations would be very valuable.
Presumptive pluripotential ES cells have been isolated in a number of additional species including 10 hamster (Doetschman et al., 1988), pig tEvans et al., 1990; Piedrahita et al., 1990; Notarianni et al., 1990;
Talbot et al., 1993), sheep (Notarianni et al., 1990), cattle (Evans et al.; Saito et al., 1992), mink (Sukoyan et al., 1993), rabbit (Graves and Moreadith, 1993), rat 15 (Iannaccione et al., 1994), man (Bongso et al., 1994) and primate (Thomson et al., 1995). However, only in the mouse and rat ES cells have been established in culture giving rise to chimeras following reintroduction into blastocysts, whereas all efforts in the rabbit and other 20 species have failed to date.
Inner cell mass (ICM) cells freshly derived from rabbit blastocysts have been shown to allow the generation of chimeric rabbits following injection into recipient blastocysts (Gardner and Munro, 1974; Moustafa, 25 1974; Babinet and Bordenave, 1980), whereas Yang et al.
(1993) have reported the production of chimeric rabbits both from freshly isolated ICM and from ICM cells maintained in culture in vitro for 3 days.
However, in order to allow gene targeting by 30 homologous recombination in ES cells, cell lines that can be kept in culture for a longer period of time and with demonstrated potential to generate chimeric animals are necessary for the production of offspring with targeted genetic alterations. Prior to the present invention, no 35 such cell lines of animals other than mice and rats had - been isolated.
The derivation of putative pluripotential rabbit ES cells was previously reported by Graves and CA 022~2~24 l998-l0-22 WO97/41209 PCT~P97/02323 Moreadith (1993). Two principal cell types emerged follo-wing serial passage of exp~anted embryos. One type had morphology identical to pr~mary outgrowths of trophecto-derm, cells that are responsible for embryo implantation.
5 The second type appeared t~pically epitheloid and was presumed to represent rabbit ES cells (Figure 1).
Although these putative ES cells were able to generate embryoid bodies, consisting of multiple cell types representative of ectoderm, mesoderm and endoderm, they 10 were unable to produce chi~eric rabbits after introduction of the epitheloid cells into blastocysts from the New Zealand White (NZW) strain (Graves and Moreadith, 1993; Graves and Moreadith, unpublished results (Table 1)) or after nuclear transfer into a 15 denucleated New Zealand White zygote (~u et al., 1995).
It was suggested that the inability to produce chimeras with these ES cells could have been due to a strain barrier. Nevertheless, the data in Table l demonstrate that no chimeric animals could be derived from any of the 20 four tested epitheloid lines, each derived from a single inner cell mass.
Table l: Results of rabbit embryo injection with putative ES cell lines (unpublished results, Graves and Moreadith) cell line stage of #injections #born (~) chimeras (%) embryo~0 -GM3 blastocyst 46 29(63) 0(0) GM4 blastocyst 24 2 (8) 0(0) GM8 morula 84 6 (7) 0(0) 35 GM4 morula 14 5(35) 0(0) Total 168 42(25) 0(0) CA 022~2~24 1998-10-22 WO97/41209 PCT~P97/02323 Niemann and Strelchenko (1994) also attempted to isolate and maintain pluripotent rabbit (California strain) ES cells but, although aggregation of the putative ES cells (maintained for a total of 12 passages) 5 with the inner cell mass of the host blastocyst (Chinchilla, Black Rex) was observed, generation of chimeric offspring was not documented. These putative ES
cells were derived from rabbit embryos collected 4 days after mating. Thus, to date, all efforts to generate 10 stable pluripotent rabbit ES cell lines, with the demonstrated potential to generate chimeric animals following injection into recipient blastocysts, have failed.
It is therefore the object of the invention to 15 come to the improved derivation and maintenance of rabbit embryonic stem (ES) cells with demonstrated potential to generate chimeric rabbits following injection in recipient blastocysts, thus enabling the production of wild type or genetically altered offspring (via either 20 homologous or non-homologous recombination, using for example gene or nuclear transfer).
It was now found that a rabbit embryonic stem (ES) cell line, comprising at least 70~, preferably 80 to 9o~ undifferentiated cells is obtainable by isolating the 25 inner cell mass of 5.5 days postcoitus blastocysts and culturing them on feeder cells in rabbit ES medium.
The rabbit ES medium according to the invention comprises high glucose Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium, 4mM L-glutamine, 0.1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 148 units/ml 30 penicillin G sodium, 148 microgram/ml streptomycin sulfate, 4 microgram/ml bovine insulin, 103 units/ml murine Leukemia Inhibitory Factor, 20~ fetal bovine serum, 1.5~ MEM non-essential amino acid solution.
The feeder cells are preferably mouse embryonic 35 fibroblasts derived from 12.5 days old mouse embryos and - used in a density of 3 to 4X106 cells per 10 cm petri dish.
CA 02252~24 1998-10-22 PCT~P97/02323 Preferably also a modified trypsinization method was used, which consists of the use of trypsinization medium comprising O.l~ collagenase, l~
chicken serum and 0.03~ trypsin-EDTA in phosphate-5 buffered saline. This medium allowed the selectivepassage of ES cells because mouse embryonic fibroblasts and trophectodermal cells detach more slowly in this medium.
Cells according to the invention are lO recognisable by virtue of their following properties:
three dimensional colony formation, positive staining for alkaline phosphatase and negative staining for cytokeratin 18 and vimentin after more than lO passages.
The invention further relates to the use of the 15 ES cell lines for the generation of chimeric rabbits, for example following blastocyst injection into recipient blastocysts or embryo aggregation or nuclear transfer.
The ES cell lines of the invention may also be used for gene alteration by homologous or non-homologous 20 recombination or for the generation of rabbits with gene alteration via germline transmission.
The use or differentiation of cell lines accor-ding to the invention can lead to the study or isolation of (novel) genes.
The present invention thus leads to the improved derivation of pluripotent ES cells, their maintenance in culture over several passages, and their use for the successful generation of chimeric animals.
The derivation and maintenance of rabbit ES
cells with demonstrated potential to generate chimeric rabbits following injection in recipient blastocysts will allow the generation of offspring capable of germline transmission of the targeted mutations following homologous or non-homologous recombination in these pluripotent ES cells. In addition, the pluripotency of the rabbit ES cells will allow to differentiate them into defined cell types enabling the study or isolation of novel genes.
CA 022~2~24 1998-10-22 WO97/41209 PCT~P97/02323 The invention will be illustrated in the following examples, that are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. Based on the present invention, several variants and improvements will be obvlous to those skilled in the art.
_ _ CA 022~2~24 l998-l0-22 WO97/41209 PCT~P97/02323 EXAMP~E 1 Cell culture conditions Starting from the ES cell line GM3, derived from Dutch Belted rabbit embryos as described by Graves and Moreadith (1993) (Figure 1), cell culture conditions were developed which stabilized the percentage of undifferen-tiated ES cells, relative to the methods described by Graves and Moreadith (1993). Thus, it became possible, for the first time, to generate chimeras after injection of ES cells into the blastocoel cavity of New Zealand White blastocysts, as will be demonstrated in Example 2.
Changes were made to the cell culture medium, the density of the mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) feeder layers, the age of the mouse embryos used to derive the MEFs, and the trypsinization medium used to dislodge cells for passage.
The culture medium used by Graves and Moreadith (1993) consisted of high glucose Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium, 4mM L-glutamine, 0.1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, penicillin G sodium 148U/ml, and streptomycin sulfate 148 ~g/ml.
According to the invention the following supplements were changed or added: 4 ~g/ml bovine insulin, 103 units/ml of murine Leukemia Inhibitory Factor, 20~ fetal bovine serum, 1.5~ MEM non-essential amino acid solution.
The rabbit ES cells (1.5 to 3 X 106 cells per 10 cm petridish) were grown to subconfluency on mouse embryonic fibroblasts mitotically arrested with mitomycin and the ES cells were passaged every 4-6 days onto freshly prepared feeders (3 to 4 X 106 cells per 10 cm dish). The ES cells were fed every day with the improved medium described above. Culture dishes were kept at 39~C
in a humidified atmosphere of 5~ C02 in air. The mouse embryonic fibroblast were derived from 12.5 day old mouse embryos and were used at passage 1. The increased density of the mouse embryonic fibroblasts (3 to 4 X lo6 as CA 022~2~24 l998-l0-22 WO97/41209 PCT~P97/02323 compared to 2 to 3 X 106 cells per 10 cm dish (Graves and Moreadith, 1993)) together with the use of 12.5 days embryos markedly reduce-d the differentiation of the ES
cells.
This reduction of differentiation proved to be crucial, since only undifferentiated cells maintain the capacity to incorporate in the inner cell mass of a recipient embryo, a prerequisite to give rise to chimeric offspring.
Furthermore, an improved selective trypsinization method was used which allowed the removal of trophectodermal cells (which can induce ES cell differentiation) from the culture. The trypsinization medium consisted of 0.1~ collagenase, 1~ chicken serum and 0.03~ trypsin-EDTA (Gibco Cat. no. 25200) in phosphate buffered saline. This selective trypsinization medium allowed the selective passage of ES cells because mouse embryonic fibroblasts and trophectodermal cells detach more slowly from the culture dish than ES cells.
Generation of chimeras The GM3 cells, derived from Dutch Belted embryos by Graves and Moreadith (1993), but maintained in culture conditions in Example 1, were used to generate chimeric offspring as described below. Blastocyst injection of the epitheloid colonies of the putative ES
cells had previously never generated chimeric rabbits after injection into rabbit embryos (Table 1). For further experiments described below, GM3 cells from passage 12 were maintained in improved culture conditions which stabilized the percentage of alkaline phosphatase positive, undifferentiated ES cells.
Sexually mature New Zealand White females were superovulated with six consecutive subcutaneous injections of porcine follicle stimulating hormone (FSH -0.4, 0.4, 0.5, 0.5, 0.5, 0.5 mg) given 12 hours apart, followed by 75 IU of human chorionic gonadoptropin (hCG) CA 022j2j24 l998-l0-22 WO97/41209 PCT~P97/02323 given intravenously 10 hours after the last dose of FSH.
Following the hCG injection, the females were mated with mature males of the same strain.
Blastocysts were recovered from the uterine horns 90 hours after mating, by flushing the uterine cavity with Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline supplemented with 3~ bovine serum albumin (Cohn fraction V) plus 5~ antibiotic/antimycotic solution (Gibco, Grand Island, NY) which had been pre-equilibrated at 39~C in a humidified atmosphere of 5~ CO2 in air.
Chimeras were generated by injection of both epitheloid alkaline phosphatase negative and the three dimensionally growing alkaline phosphatase positive ES
cells into the blastocoel cavity of New Zealand White blastocyst (Table 2). A total of 287 New Zealand White blastocysts were injected with 20 to 300 cells from the GM3 cell line. Blastocyst injections with GM3 cells were performed on a Zeiss inverted microscope with differential interference optics at a magnification of 250X. Micromanipulations were performed with Narashige micromanipulators as routinely employed for the mouse.
Between 5 and 10 embryos injected with GM3 cells were reimplanted into the proximal portion of each uterine horn of a recipient New Zealand White doe using a small incision and a sharpened glass pipette. This recipient doe had previously received 75 IU of hCG, 14 hours after the time of hCG injection in the donors. The reimplantation procedure was done under general anesthesia with a ketamine/xylazine mixture.
CA 022~2~24 1998-10-22 WO97/41209 PCT~P97/02323 Table 2: Production of chimeras after injection of ES
cells into the blastocoel cavity of New Zealand White blastocysts #blasts injected #ES cells passage #born(~) #chimeras(~) 76 20-30 22 30(41) 1(1) 124 50-100 15 31(25) 1(1) 87 100-300 18 6(7) 1(1) Total 287 67(23) 3(1) Percentages in parentheses are relative to numbers of blastocysts injected.
This procedure resulted in an overall live birth rate of 23~. Since the ES cell line used was derived from the pigmented Dutch Belted strain, injection of GM3 ES cells into blastocysts from a nonpigmented New Zealand White strain will generate overt coat color formation in chimeras. As judged by coat color, three chimeric animals were obtained with one or more black belts, typical for the Dutch Belted strain. The percentage of chimerism varied between 10% to more than 50~, based upon contribution of the Dutch Belted pigmented coat. One of these chimeras was male (Figure 2a), one female (Figure 2b) and one probably a hermaphrodite. These results constitute the first proof of principle that chimeric rabbits can be generated by blastocyst injection of ES cell lines maintained in culture and extensively (15 to 22 times) passaged. In retrospect chimerism appeared to be attributable to the three dimensionally growing alkaline phosphatase positive ES cells, as further detailed below.
Indeed, the frequency of chimera formation following injection of ES cells into the blastocoel cavity was low - only 4~ of live born animals. This might have been due to several factors, including 1) infrequent CA 022~2~24 l998-l0-22 WO97/41209 PCT~P97/02323 ~ incorporation of ES cells into the developing embryo due to the prominent void space in the mature blastocyst into which the ES cells were introduced, 2) an inherent incom-patibility of Dutch Belted ES cell lines with New Zealand White blastocysts, or 3) loss of pluripotency of the cell lines. Attempt to increase the frequency of delivery of ES cells to the developing inner cell mass by introducing the ES cells directly onto or into the developing inner cell mass, a prerequisite for incorporation into the subsequent embryo, did not result in a higher frequency or chimera formation. The use of Dutch White blastocysts (originating from the Dutch Belted strain by a natural point mutation) as recipients for ES cell injections also did not generate chimeras, thus eliminating the involvement of a strain barrier.
Additional experiments revealed that the absence of chimera formation with ES cells maintained in culture as described by Graves and Moreadith (1993) and the low efficiency with ES cells cultured as described in Example 1, starting from early passage GM3 cells was most likely due to the absence in the former and the low percentage in the latter of residual pluripotent ES
cells. This was revealed by staining for alkaline phosphatase, which is present in undifferentiated cells, but rapidly lost upon differentiation (Benham et al., 1981). The occurrence of alkaline phosphatase positive cells in the original cell line was less than 1~ after passage 10 (Figure 1), al- though this frequency cou~d be maintained under the improved culture conditions described herein. It appears that the flat epithelioid cell type (Figure 1) originally thought to represent putative ES cells (Graves and Moreadith, 1993) are mostly alkaline phosphatase negative, unable to incorporate in the inner cell mass of the recipient blastocyst, and unable to generate chimeric off-spring. Therefore new ES
cell lines were derived as described in Example 3.
CA 022~2~24 l998-l0-22 WO97/41209 PCT~P97/02323 Improved derivation of ES cells Improved methods for derivation of ES cells were developed which, in combination with the improved cell culture conditions, allowed the generation of five rabbit ES cell lines which consist of more than 80%
undifferen-tiated alkaline phosphatase positive cells after 8 to 10 passages, as described below.
Superovulated Dutch Belted does were mated with Dutch Belted bucks. The blastocysts were flushed from the uterine horns on day 5.5 (postcoitus instead of 4 or 5 days postcoitus) and rinsed with Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline supplemented with 3% bovine serum albumin (Cohn fraction V) plus 5% (v/v) antibiotic/antimycotic solution. The blastocysts were kept in rabbit ES medium (described above) at 39~C in a 5% CO2 incubator until further manipulation. The mucin coat and zona pellucida of the blastocysts were removed using acidified phosphate buffered saline (pH=2.5) and 0.5% pronase in phosphate buffered saline. The inner cell mass was prepared manually out of the surrounding trophectoderm cells with 2 needles and placed individually in a 96 well culture dish (plated with 12.5 days old, passage 1 mouse embryonic fibroblasts with a density equivalent to 3 to 4 X 10 cells per 10 cm dish).
The explanted inner cell masses were refed daily with the improved rabbit ~S cell medium described above in which murine Leukemia Inhibitory Factor was replaced by human or rabbit Leukemia Inhibitory Factor.
After 2 days, the inner cell mass outgrowth was easily freed from remaining trophectoderm cells by gently lifting the trophectoderm outgrowth with a beveled glass pipet off the underlying feeder layer and by aspirating it into the glass pipet.
Only ES-like colonies, characterised by three dimensional growth were subsequently passaged onto new culture dishes. Therefor the 96 well was selectively trypsinized after 4 to 5 days with the trypsinization medium described above, thus allowing the selective CA 022s2s24 1998-10-22 passaging of ES cells and not of trophectoderm cells or mouse embryonic fibroblasts. The three dimensional growth typical of the improved rabbit ES cells has not been noticed before and is apparently a novel characteristic of such cell lines. Only with the improved culture conditions and the use of 5.5 days old embryos, could three dimensional undifferentiated ES cell colonies be maintained at high frequency in culture. The ES cells were passaged very gradually onto larger culture dishes at 4 to 5 days intervals, to maintain the ES cells at a very high density, another prerequisite to prevent differentiation and loss of pluripotency. The feeder densities on the subsequent culture dishes was maintained at densities equivalent of 3 to 4 X 10 cells per 10 cm dish.
The rabbit ES cell lines obtained by this procedure (Figure 3) are more similar to pluripotent murine ES cell lines than any of the rabbit ES variants previously reported. The main characteristics are colony growth in three dimensions, high refractility and a small nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio. The most important characteristics are that after 10 passages, 80 to 90% of the ES cells remain undifferentiated as indicated by their positive staining for alkaline phosphatase (Figure 3b), and negative staining for human cyto~eratin 18 and mouse vimentin, which are known markers of differentiation (Viebahn et al., 1988; Piedrahita et al., 1990)~ These properties stand in major contrast with those of the earlier putative ES cell line (Figure 1), where less than 1% of the cells were undifferentiated as judged by al~aline phosphatase positive staining. This enormous increase in the percentage of undifferentiated cells (from 1~ to 80-90~) in frequently passaged rabbit ES cells, should markedly increase the efficiency of chimeric rabbit generation by ES cell injection into - blastocysts and allow the generation of chimeric rabbits containing targeted genetic alterations.
CA 022~2~24 1998-10-22 PCT~P97/02323 REFERENCES
- Babinet C, Bordenave GR (1980)i Chimeric rabbits from immunosurgically-prepared inner cell mass transplantation. J Embryol Exp Morphoi 60:429-440.
- Benham FJ, Andrews FW, Knowles BB, Bronson DL, Harris H (1981): Alkaline phosphatase isozymes as possible markers of differentiation in human testicular teratocarcinoma cell lines. Dev. Bio 88:279-287.
- Bongso A, Fong C-Y, Ng S-C, Ratman S (1994):
Isolation and culture of inner cell-mass from human blastocysts. Hum Reprod 9:2110-2117.
- Bradley A (1987): Production and analysis of chimeric mice. In: Teratocarcinomas and Embryonic Stem Cells: A Practical Approach (Ed. Robertson EJ), IRI Press Ltd., Oxford, 1987, pp. 113-15i.
- Capecchi MR (1989): Altering the genome by homologous recombination. Science 244:1288-1292.
- Doetschman T, Williams P, Maeda N (1988):
Establishment of hamster blastocyst-derived embryonic stem (ES) cells. Dev Biol 127:224-227.
- Du F, Giles JR, Foote RH, Graves KG, Yang X, Moreadith RW (1995): Nuclear transfer of putative rabbit embryonic stem cells leads to normal blastocyst development. J Reprod Fert 104:219-223.
25 - Evans MJ, Notarianni E, Laurie S, Moor RM (1990):
Derivation and preliminary characterization of pluripotent cell lines from porcine and bovine blastocysts. Theriogenology 33:125-123.
- Gardner RL, Munro AJ (1974): Successful construction of chimeric rabbit. Nature 250:146.
- Graves KH, Moreadith RW (1993): Derivation and characterization of putative pluripotential embryonic stem cells from preimplantation rabbit embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 36:424-433.
35 - Iannaccone PM, Taborn GU, Garton RL, Caplice MD, ~renin DR (1994): Pluripotent embryonic stem cells CA 022~2~24 1998-10-22 PCT~P97/02323 from the rat capable of producing chimeras. Dev Biol 163:288-292.
- Johnson LV, Calarco PG, Siebert LS (1977): Alkaline phosphatase activity in the preimplantation mouse embryo. J Embryol exp Morph 40:83-89.
- Moustafa L (1974): Chimeric rabbits from embryonic cell transplantation. Proc Soc Exp Biol 147:485-488.
- Nagy, A, J Rossant, R Nagy, W Abromow-Newerly, and Roder JC (1993): Derivation of completely cell culture derived mice from early-passage embryonic stem cells Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:8424-8428.
- Nieman H, Strelchenko N (1994): Isolation of rabbit embryonic stem (ES) cell like cells. Theriogenology 41:265.
15 - Notarianni E, Galli C, Laurie S, Moor RM, Evans MJ
(1991): Derivation of pluripotent, embryonic cell lines from the pig and sheep. J Reprod Fert Suppl 43:25S-260.
- Notarianni E, Laurie S, Moor RM, Evans MG (1990):
Maintenance and differentiation in culture of pluripotential embryonic cell lines from pig blastocysts. J Reprod Fert 40:51-56.
- Piedrahita JA, Anderson GB, BonDurant RH (1990): On the isolation of embryonic stem cells: Comparative behaviour of murine, porcine and ovine embryos.
Theriogenology 34:879-891.
- Robertson EJ (1987): Embryo-derived stem cell lines;
In/ Teratocarcinomas and Embryonic Stem Cells: A
Practical Approach (Ed. Robertson EJ), IRI Press Ltd., Oxford, 1987, pp. 71-112.
- Rubin EM, Barsh GS (1996): Biological insights through genomics: mouse to man. J Clin Invest 97:275-280.
- Saito S, Strelchenko N, Nieman H (1992): Bovine embryonic stem cell-like cell lines cultured over several passages. Roux Arch Dev Biol 201:134-141.
- Strojeck M, Reed MA, Hoover JL, Wagner TE (1990): A
method for cultivating morphologically CA 022~2~24 l998-l0-22 PCT~P97/02323 undifferentiated embryonic stem cells from porcine blastocysts. Theriogenology 33: 901-913.
- Sukoyan MA, Golubitsa AN, Zhelezova AI, Shilov AG, Vatolin SY, Maximovsky LP, Andreeva LE, Mc Whir J, Pack SD, Bayborodin SI, Kerkis AY, Kizilova HI, Serov OL (1992): Isolation and cultivation of blastocyst-derived stem cell lines from American mink. Mol Reprod Dev 33: 418 - 431.
- Talbot NC, Caird ER jr, Vernon GP, Powell AM, Nel ND
(1993): Culturing the pig epiblast cells of the pig blastocysts. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 29A: 546-554.
- Thomson JA, Kalishman J, Golos TG, During M, Harris CP, Becker RA, Hearn JP (1995): Isolation of a primate embryonic stem cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 7844-7848.
- Viebahn C, Lane BE, and Ramackers FCS (1988) Keratin and Vimentin expression in early embryogenesis of the rabbit embryo. Cell Tissue Research 253: 553 - 562.
- Wilson JM (1996): Animal models of human disease for gene therapy. J Clin Invest 97: 1138-1141.
- Yang X, Foote RH (1988): Production of chimeric rabbi~s from morulae by a simple procedure. Gamete Res 21: 345-351.
CA 022~2~24 l998-l0-22 PCT~P97/02323 WO 97/4120g LEGENDS TO THE FIGURES
~ Fig. 1:
Rabbit ES cells (GM3 l-ine), derived by Graves and Moreadith.
A) phase contrast microscopy of the putative ES
cells revealing a flat epitheloid phenotype B) alkaline phosphatase staining of the putative ES cells, showing a very low percentage (< 1 percent) of alkaline phosphatase positive cells (red).
Fig. 2:
A) male chimera with one black belt.
B) female chimera, showing several black belts.
The belts are typical for the Dutch Belted strain from which the GM3 ES cell line was derived.
FIg 3:
A) phase contract microscopy of a newly derived cell line using the improved cell culture and E~ derivation conditions described above.
B) alkaline phosphatase staining of a rabbit ES
cell line derived using the improved cel culture and ES derivation conditions described above. The new ES cell line is characterized by three dimensional growth, high refractibility and 80 to 90~ alkaline phosphatase positive staining.
THEIR USE IN THE r,~N~TION OF CHIMERIC RABBITS
The present invention relates to novel rabblt embryonic stem (ES) cell lines and their use in the gene-ration of chimerlc rabbits.
Gene targeting (via homologous recombination in 5 embryonic stem (ES) cells) technology allows the manipulation of the genome in desired and defined ways (Capecchi, 1989; Robertson, 1987; Bradley, 1987).
Briefly, genes to be targeted are incorporated in plasmid transfer vectors and altered by replacement of some of 10 their sequence with foreign DNA which encodes selectable markers (inactivation) or by a mutated gene sequence (targeted mutagenesis). These inactivated or mutated genes are then introduced into ES cells (which each have the potential to develop into a complete animal).
15 Subsequently clones of ES cells in which the natural gene is replaced by the inactivated hybrid are selected ln vitro, and these selected clones are introduced into normal embryos which are reimplanted. This process generates chimeric animals which are selected for 20 germline transmission of the inactivated gene. Through breeding and selection, transgenic animals are then gene-rated which are deficient in the targeted ("knocked-out") gene.
Completely ES cell derived mice can be 25 generated utilising the recently developed technology to aggregate wild type or mutant ES cells with tetraploid embryos (Nagy et al., 1993). Alternatively ES cells can be used for introduction of genetic material by non-homologous recombination, allowing the study of genetic 30 alteration in live animals.
The application of transgenic technologies and ES cell technologies for the alteration of gene function - has provided animal models of important human diseases (for review cfr. Wilson, 1996; Rubin and Barsch, 1996).
35 However, at present this technology has only been CA 022~2S24 1998-10-22 WO97/41209 PCT~P97/02323 successful in the mouse. Although useful for many applications, the mouse has significant restrictions (e.g. size and inability to generate the phenotype of human diseases) that limit its potential applications.
5 Consequently, larger animal models to test the phenotypic consequences or loss-of-function mutations would be very valuable.
Presumptive pluripotential ES cells have been isolated in a number of additional species including 10 hamster (Doetschman et al., 1988), pig tEvans et al., 1990; Piedrahita et al., 1990; Notarianni et al., 1990;
Talbot et al., 1993), sheep (Notarianni et al., 1990), cattle (Evans et al.; Saito et al., 1992), mink (Sukoyan et al., 1993), rabbit (Graves and Moreadith, 1993), rat 15 (Iannaccione et al., 1994), man (Bongso et al., 1994) and primate (Thomson et al., 1995). However, only in the mouse and rat ES cells have been established in culture giving rise to chimeras following reintroduction into blastocysts, whereas all efforts in the rabbit and other 20 species have failed to date.
Inner cell mass (ICM) cells freshly derived from rabbit blastocysts have been shown to allow the generation of chimeric rabbits following injection into recipient blastocysts (Gardner and Munro, 1974; Moustafa, 25 1974; Babinet and Bordenave, 1980), whereas Yang et al.
(1993) have reported the production of chimeric rabbits both from freshly isolated ICM and from ICM cells maintained in culture in vitro for 3 days.
However, in order to allow gene targeting by 30 homologous recombination in ES cells, cell lines that can be kept in culture for a longer period of time and with demonstrated potential to generate chimeric animals are necessary for the production of offspring with targeted genetic alterations. Prior to the present invention, no 35 such cell lines of animals other than mice and rats had - been isolated.
The derivation of putative pluripotential rabbit ES cells was previously reported by Graves and CA 022~2~24 l998-l0-22 WO97/41209 PCT~P97/02323 Moreadith (1993). Two principal cell types emerged follo-wing serial passage of exp~anted embryos. One type had morphology identical to pr~mary outgrowths of trophecto-derm, cells that are responsible for embryo implantation.
5 The second type appeared t~pically epitheloid and was presumed to represent rabbit ES cells (Figure 1).
Although these putative ES cells were able to generate embryoid bodies, consisting of multiple cell types representative of ectoderm, mesoderm and endoderm, they 10 were unable to produce chi~eric rabbits after introduction of the epitheloid cells into blastocysts from the New Zealand White (NZW) strain (Graves and Moreadith, 1993; Graves and Moreadith, unpublished results (Table 1)) or after nuclear transfer into a 15 denucleated New Zealand White zygote (~u et al., 1995).
It was suggested that the inability to produce chimeras with these ES cells could have been due to a strain barrier. Nevertheless, the data in Table l demonstrate that no chimeric animals could be derived from any of the 20 four tested epitheloid lines, each derived from a single inner cell mass.
Table l: Results of rabbit embryo injection with putative ES cell lines (unpublished results, Graves and Moreadith) cell line stage of #injections #born (~) chimeras (%) embryo~0 -GM3 blastocyst 46 29(63) 0(0) GM4 blastocyst 24 2 (8) 0(0) GM8 morula 84 6 (7) 0(0) 35 GM4 morula 14 5(35) 0(0) Total 168 42(25) 0(0) CA 022~2~24 1998-10-22 WO97/41209 PCT~P97/02323 Niemann and Strelchenko (1994) also attempted to isolate and maintain pluripotent rabbit (California strain) ES cells but, although aggregation of the putative ES cells (maintained for a total of 12 passages) 5 with the inner cell mass of the host blastocyst (Chinchilla, Black Rex) was observed, generation of chimeric offspring was not documented. These putative ES
cells were derived from rabbit embryos collected 4 days after mating. Thus, to date, all efforts to generate 10 stable pluripotent rabbit ES cell lines, with the demonstrated potential to generate chimeric animals following injection into recipient blastocysts, have failed.
It is therefore the object of the invention to 15 come to the improved derivation and maintenance of rabbit embryonic stem (ES) cells with demonstrated potential to generate chimeric rabbits following injection in recipient blastocysts, thus enabling the production of wild type or genetically altered offspring (via either 20 homologous or non-homologous recombination, using for example gene or nuclear transfer).
It was now found that a rabbit embryonic stem (ES) cell line, comprising at least 70~, preferably 80 to 9o~ undifferentiated cells is obtainable by isolating the 25 inner cell mass of 5.5 days postcoitus blastocysts and culturing them on feeder cells in rabbit ES medium.
The rabbit ES medium according to the invention comprises high glucose Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium, 4mM L-glutamine, 0.1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 148 units/ml 30 penicillin G sodium, 148 microgram/ml streptomycin sulfate, 4 microgram/ml bovine insulin, 103 units/ml murine Leukemia Inhibitory Factor, 20~ fetal bovine serum, 1.5~ MEM non-essential amino acid solution.
The feeder cells are preferably mouse embryonic 35 fibroblasts derived from 12.5 days old mouse embryos and - used in a density of 3 to 4X106 cells per 10 cm petri dish.
CA 02252~24 1998-10-22 PCT~P97/02323 Preferably also a modified trypsinization method was used, which consists of the use of trypsinization medium comprising O.l~ collagenase, l~
chicken serum and 0.03~ trypsin-EDTA in phosphate-5 buffered saline. This medium allowed the selectivepassage of ES cells because mouse embryonic fibroblasts and trophectodermal cells detach more slowly in this medium.
Cells according to the invention are lO recognisable by virtue of their following properties:
three dimensional colony formation, positive staining for alkaline phosphatase and negative staining for cytokeratin 18 and vimentin after more than lO passages.
The invention further relates to the use of the 15 ES cell lines for the generation of chimeric rabbits, for example following blastocyst injection into recipient blastocysts or embryo aggregation or nuclear transfer.
The ES cell lines of the invention may also be used for gene alteration by homologous or non-homologous 20 recombination or for the generation of rabbits with gene alteration via germline transmission.
The use or differentiation of cell lines accor-ding to the invention can lead to the study or isolation of (novel) genes.
The present invention thus leads to the improved derivation of pluripotent ES cells, their maintenance in culture over several passages, and their use for the successful generation of chimeric animals.
The derivation and maintenance of rabbit ES
cells with demonstrated potential to generate chimeric rabbits following injection in recipient blastocysts will allow the generation of offspring capable of germline transmission of the targeted mutations following homologous or non-homologous recombination in these pluripotent ES cells. In addition, the pluripotency of the rabbit ES cells will allow to differentiate them into defined cell types enabling the study or isolation of novel genes.
CA 022~2~24 1998-10-22 WO97/41209 PCT~P97/02323 The invention will be illustrated in the following examples, that are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. Based on the present invention, several variants and improvements will be obvlous to those skilled in the art.
_ _ CA 022~2~24 l998-l0-22 WO97/41209 PCT~P97/02323 EXAMP~E 1 Cell culture conditions Starting from the ES cell line GM3, derived from Dutch Belted rabbit embryos as described by Graves and Moreadith (1993) (Figure 1), cell culture conditions were developed which stabilized the percentage of undifferen-tiated ES cells, relative to the methods described by Graves and Moreadith (1993). Thus, it became possible, for the first time, to generate chimeras after injection of ES cells into the blastocoel cavity of New Zealand White blastocysts, as will be demonstrated in Example 2.
Changes were made to the cell culture medium, the density of the mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) feeder layers, the age of the mouse embryos used to derive the MEFs, and the trypsinization medium used to dislodge cells for passage.
The culture medium used by Graves and Moreadith (1993) consisted of high glucose Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium, 4mM L-glutamine, 0.1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, penicillin G sodium 148U/ml, and streptomycin sulfate 148 ~g/ml.
According to the invention the following supplements were changed or added: 4 ~g/ml bovine insulin, 103 units/ml of murine Leukemia Inhibitory Factor, 20~ fetal bovine serum, 1.5~ MEM non-essential amino acid solution.
The rabbit ES cells (1.5 to 3 X 106 cells per 10 cm petridish) were grown to subconfluency on mouse embryonic fibroblasts mitotically arrested with mitomycin and the ES cells were passaged every 4-6 days onto freshly prepared feeders (3 to 4 X 106 cells per 10 cm dish). The ES cells were fed every day with the improved medium described above. Culture dishes were kept at 39~C
in a humidified atmosphere of 5~ C02 in air. The mouse embryonic fibroblast were derived from 12.5 day old mouse embryos and were used at passage 1. The increased density of the mouse embryonic fibroblasts (3 to 4 X lo6 as CA 022~2~24 l998-l0-22 WO97/41209 PCT~P97/02323 compared to 2 to 3 X 106 cells per 10 cm dish (Graves and Moreadith, 1993)) together with the use of 12.5 days embryos markedly reduce-d the differentiation of the ES
cells.
This reduction of differentiation proved to be crucial, since only undifferentiated cells maintain the capacity to incorporate in the inner cell mass of a recipient embryo, a prerequisite to give rise to chimeric offspring.
Furthermore, an improved selective trypsinization method was used which allowed the removal of trophectodermal cells (which can induce ES cell differentiation) from the culture. The trypsinization medium consisted of 0.1~ collagenase, 1~ chicken serum and 0.03~ trypsin-EDTA (Gibco Cat. no. 25200) in phosphate buffered saline. This selective trypsinization medium allowed the selective passage of ES cells because mouse embryonic fibroblasts and trophectodermal cells detach more slowly from the culture dish than ES cells.
Generation of chimeras The GM3 cells, derived from Dutch Belted embryos by Graves and Moreadith (1993), but maintained in culture conditions in Example 1, were used to generate chimeric offspring as described below. Blastocyst injection of the epitheloid colonies of the putative ES
cells had previously never generated chimeric rabbits after injection into rabbit embryos (Table 1). For further experiments described below, GM3 cells from passage 12 were maintained in improved culture conditions which stabilized the percentage of alkaline phosphatase positive, undifferentiated ES cells.
Sexually mature New Zealand White females were superovulated with six consecutive subcutaneous injections of porcine follicle stimulating hormone (FSH -0.4, 0.4, 0.5, 0.5, 0.5, 0.5 mg) given 12 hours apart, followed by 75 IU of human chorionic gonadoptropin (hCG) CA 022j2j24 l998-l0-22 WO97/41209 PCT~P97/02323 given intravenously 10 hours after the last dose of FSH.
Following the hCG injection, the females were mated with mature males of the same strain.
Blastocysts were recovered from the uterine horns 90 hours after mating, by flushing the uterine cavity with Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline supplemented with 3~ bovine serum albumin (Cohn fraction V) plus 5~ antibiotic/antimycotic solution (Gibco, Grand Island, NY) which had been pre-equilibrated at 39~C in a humidified atmosphere of 5~ CO2 in air.
Chimeras were generated by injection of both epitheloid alkaline phosphatase negative and the three dimensionally growing alkaline phosphatase positive ES
cells into the blastocoel cavity of New Zealand White blastocyst (Table 2). A total of 287 New Zealand White blastocysts were injected with 20 to 300 cells from the GM3 cell line. Blastocyst injections with GM3 cells were performed on a Zeiss inverted microscope with differential interference optics at a magnification of 250X. Micromanipulations were performed with Narashige micromanipulators as routinely employed for the mouse.
Between 5 and 10 embryos injected with GM3 cells were reimplanted into the proximal portion of each uterine horn of a recipient New Zealand White doe using a small incision and a sharpened glass pipette. This recipient doe had previously received 75 IU of hCG, 14 hours after the time of hCG injection in the donors. The reimplantation procedure was done under general anesthesia with a ketamine/xylazine mixture.
CA 022~2~24 1998-10-22 WO97/41209 PCT~P97/02323 Table 2: Production of chimeras after injection of ES
cells into the blastocoel cavity of New Zealand White blastocysts #blasts injected #ES cells passage #born(~) #chimeras(~) 76 20-30 22 30(41) 1(1) 124 50-100 15 31(25) 1(1) 87 100-300 18 6(7) 1(1) Total 287 67(23) 3(1) Percentages in parentheses are relative to numbers of blastocysts injected.
This procedure resulted in an overall live birth rate of 23~. Since the ES cell line used was derived from the pigmented Dutch Belted strain, injection of GM3 ES cells into blastocysts from a nonpigmented New Zealand White strain will generate overt coat color formation in chimeras. As judged by coat color, three chimeric animals were obtained with one or more black belts, typical for the Dutch Belted strain. The percentage of chimerism varied between 10% to more than 50~, based upon contribution of the Dutch Belted pigmented coat. One of these chimeras was male (Figure 2a), one female (Figure 2b) and one probably a hermaphrodite. These results constitute the first proof of principle that chimeric rabbits can be generated by blastocyst injection of ES cell lines maintained in culture and extensively (15 to 22 times) passaged. In retrospect chimerism appeared to be attributable to the three dimensionally growing alkaline phosphatase positive ES cells, as further detailed below.
Indeed, the frequency of chimera formation following injection of ES cells into the blastocoel cavity was low - only 4~ of live born animals. This might have been due to several factors, including 1) infrequent CA 022~2~24 l998-l0-22 WO97/41209 PCT~P97/02323 ~ incorporation of ES cells into the developing embryo due to the prominent void space in the mature blastocyst into which the ES cells were introduced, 2) an inherent incom-patibility of Dutch Belted ES cell lines with New Zealand White blastocysts, or 3) loss of pluripotency of the cell lines. Attempt to increase the frequency of delivery of ES cells to the developing inner cell mass by introducing the ES cells directly onto or into the developing inner cell mass, a prerequisite for incorporation into the subsequent embryo, did not result in a higher frequency or chimera formation. The use of Dutch White blastocysts (originating from the Dutch Belted strain by a natural point mutation) as recipients for ES cell injections also did not generate chimeras, thus eliminating the involvement of a strain barrier.
Additional experiments revealed that the absence of chimera formation with ES cells maintained in culture as described by Graves and Moreadith (1993) and the low efficiency with ES cells cultured as described in Example 1, starting from early passage GM3 cells was most likely due to the absence in the former and the low percentage in the latter of residual pluripotent ES
cells. This was revealed by staining for alkaline phosphatase, which is present in undifferentiated cells, but rapidly lost upon differentiation (Benham et al., 1981). The occurrence of alkaline phosphatase positive cells in the original cell line was less than 1~ after passage 10 (Figure 1), al- though this frequency cou~d be maintained under the improved culture conditions described herein. It appears that the flat epithelioid cell type (Figure 1) originally thought to represent putative ES cells (Graves and Moreadith, 1993) are mostly alkaline phosphatase negative, unable to incorporate in the inner cell mass of the recipient blastocyst, and unable to generate chimeric off-spring. Therefore new ES
cell lines were derived as described in Example 3.
CA 022~2~24 l998-l0-22 WO97/41209 PCT~P97/02323 Improved derivation of ES cells Improved methods for derivation of ES cells were developed which, in combination with the improved cell culture conditions, allowed the generation of five rabbit ES cell lines which consist of more than 80%
undifferen-tiated alkaline phosphatase positive cells after 8 to 10 passages, as described below.
Superovulated Dutch Belted does were mated with Dutch Belted bucks. The blastocysts were flushed from the uterine horns on day 5.5 (postcoitus instead of 4 or 5 days postcoitus) and rinsed with Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline supplemented with 3% bovine serum albumin (Cohn fraction V) plus 5% (v/v) antibiotic/antimycotic solution. The blastocysts were kept in rabbit ES medium (described above) at 39~C in a 5% CO2 incubator until further manipulation. The mucin coat and zona pellucida of the blastocysts were removed using acidified phosphate buffered saline (pH=2.5) and 0.5% pronase in phosphate buffered saline. The inner cell mass was prepared manually out of the surrounding trophectoderm cells with 2 needles and placed individually in a 96 well culture dish (plated with 12.5 days old, passage 1 mouse embryonic fibroblasts with a density equivalent to 3 to 4 X 10 cells per 10 cm dish).
The explanted inner cell masses were refed daily with the improved rabbit ~S cell medium described above in which murine Leukemia Inhibitory Factor was replaced by human or rabbit Leukemia Inhibitory Factor.
After 2 days, the inner cell mass outgrowth was easily freed from remaining trophectoderm cells by gently lifting the trophectoderm outgrowth with a beveled glass pipet off the underlying feeder layer and by aspirating it into the glass pipet.
Only ES-like colonies, characterised by three dimensional growth were subsequently passaged onto new culture dishes. Therefor the 96 well was selectively trypsinized after 4 to 5 days with the trypsinization medium described above, thus allowing the selective CA 022s2s24 1998-10-22 passaging of ES cells and not of trophectoderm cells or mouse embryonic fibroblasts. The three dimensional growth typical of the improved rabbit ES cells has not been noticed before and is apparently a novel characteristic of such cell lines. Only with the improved culture conditions and the use of 5.5 days old embryos, could three dimensional undifferentiated ES cell colonies be maintained at high frequency in culture. The ES cells were passaged very gradually onto larger culture dishes at 4 to 5 days intervals, to maintain the ES cells at a very high density, another prerequisite to prevent differentiation and loss of pluripotency. The feeder densities on the subsequent culture dishes was maintained at densities equivalent of 3 to 4 X 10 cells per 10 cm dish.
The rabbit ES cell lines obtained by this procedure (Figure 3) are more similar to pluripotent murine ES cell lines than any of the rabbit ES variants previously reported. The main characteristics are colony growth in three dimensions, high refractility and a small nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio. The most important characteristics are that after 10 passages, 80 to 90% of the ES cells remain undifferentiated as indicated by their positive staining for alkaline phosphatase (Figure 3b), and negative staining for human cyto~eratin 18 and mouse vimentin, which are known markers of differentiation (Viebahn et al., 1988; Piedrahita et al., 1990)~ These properties stand in major contrast with those of the earlier putative ES cell line (Figure 1), where less than 1% of the cells were undifferentiated as judged by al~aline phosphatase positive staining. This enormous increase in the percentage of undifferentiated cells (from 1~ to 80-90~) in frequently passaged rabbit ES cells, should markedly increase the efficiency of chimeric rabbit generation by ES cell injection into - blastocysts and allow the generation of chimeric rabbits containing targeted genetic alterations.
CA 022~2~24 1998-10-22 PCT~P97/02323 REFERENCES
- Babinet C, Bordenave GR (1980)i Chimeric rabbits from immunosurgically-prepared inner cell mass transplantation. J Embryol Exp Morphoi 60:429-440.
- Benham FJ, Andrews FW, Knowles BB, Bronson DL, Harris H (1981): Alkaline phosphatase isozymes as possible markers of differentiation in human testicular teratocarcinoma cell lines. Dev. Bio 88:279-287.
- Bongso A, Fong C-Y, Ng S-C, Ratman S (1994):
Isolation and culture of inner cell-mass from human blastocysts. Hum Reprod 9:2110-2117.
- Bradley A (1987): Production and analysis of chimeric mice. In: Teratocarcinomas and Embryonic Stem Cells: A Practical Approach (Ed. Robertson EJ), IRI Press Ltd., Oxford, 1987, pp. 113-15i.
- Capecchi MR (1989): Altering the genome by homologous recombination. Science 244:1288-1292.
- Doetschman T, Williams P, Maeda N (1988):
Establishment of hamster blastocyst-derived embryonic stem (ES) cells. Dev Biol 127:224-227.
- Du F, Giles JR, Foote RH, Graves KG, Yang X, Moreadith RW (1995): Nuclear transfer of putative rabbit embryonic stem cells leads to normal blastocyst development. J Reprod Fert 104:219-223.
25 - Evans MJ, Notarianni E, Laurie S, Moor RM (1990):
Derivation and preliminary characterization of pluripotent cell lines from porcine and bovine blastocysts. Theriogenology 33:125-123.
- Gardner RL, Munro AJ (1974): Successful construction of chimeric rabbit. Nature 250:146.
- Graves KH, Moreadith RW (1993): Derivation and characterization of putative pluripotential embryonic stem cells from preimplantation rabbit embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 36:424-433.
35 - Iannaccone PM, Taborn GU, Garton RL, Caplice MD, ~renin DR (1994): Pluripotent embryonic stem cells CA 022~2~24 1998-10-22 PCT~P97/02323 from the rat capable of producing chimeras. Dev Biol 163:288-292.
- Johnson LV, Calarco PG, Siebert LS (1977): Alkaline phosphatase activity in the preimplantation mouse embryo. J Embryol exp Morph 40:83-89.
- Moustafa L (1974): Chimeric rabbits from embryonic cell transplantation. Proc Soc Exp Biol 147:485-488.
- Nagy, A, J Rossant, R Nagy, W Abromow-Newerly, and Roder JC (1993): Derivation of completely cell culture derived mice from early-passage embryonic stem cells Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:8424-8428.
- Nieman H, Strelchenko N (1994): Isolation of rabbit embryonic stem (ES) cell like cells. Theriogenology 41:265.
15 - Notarianni E, Galli C, Laurie S, Moor RM, Evans MJ
(1991): Derivation of pluripotent, embryonic cell lines from the pig and sheep. J Reprod Fert Suppl 43:25S-260.
- Notarianni E, Laurie S, Moor RM, Evans MG (1990):
Maintenance and differentiation in culture of pluripotential embryonic cell lines from pig blastocysts. J Reprod Fert 40:51-56.
- Piedrahita JA, Anderson GB, BonDurant RH (1990): On the isolation of embryonic stem cells: Comparative behaviour of murine, porcine and ovine embryos.
Theriogenology 34:879-891.
- Robertson EJ (1987): Embryo-derived stem cell lines;
In/ Teratocarcinomas and Embryonic Stem Cells: A
Practical Approach (Ed. Robertson EJ), IRI Press Ltd., Oxford, 1987, pp. 71-112.
- Rubin EM, Barsh GS (1996): Biological insights through genomics: mouse to man. J Clin Invest 97:275-280.
- Saito S, Strelchenko N, Nieman H (1992): Bovine embryonic stem cell-like cell lines cultured over several passages. Roux Arch Dev Biol 201:134-141.
- Strojeck M, Reed MA, Hoover JL, Wagner TE (1990): A
method for cultivating morphologically CA 022~2~24 l998-l0-22 PCT~P97/02323 undifferentiated embryonic stem cells from porcine blastocysts. Theriogenology 33: 901-913.
- Sukoyan MA, Golubitsa AN, Zhelezova AI, Shilov AG, Vatolin SY, Maximovsky LP, Andreeva LE, Mc Whir J, Pack SD, Bayborodin SI, Kerkis AY, Kizilova HI, Serov OL (1992): Isolation and cultivation of blastocyst-derived stem cell lines from American mink. Mol Reprod Dev 33: 418 - 431.
- Talbot NC, Caird ER jr, Vernon GP, Powell AM, Nel ND
(1993): Culturing the pig epiblast cells of the pig blastocysts. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 29A: 546-554.
- Thomson JA, Kalishman J, Golos TG, During M, Harris CP, Becker RA, Hearn JP (1995): Isolation of a primate embryonic stem cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 7844-7848.
- Viebahn C, Lane BE, and Ramackers FCS (1988) Keratin and Vimentin expression in early embryogenesis of the rabbit embryo. Cell Tissue Research 253: 553 - 562.
- Wilson JM (1996): Animal models of human disease for gene therapy. J Clin Invest 97: 1138-1141.
- Yang X, Foote RH (1988): Production of chimeric rabbi~s from morulae by a simple procedure. Gamete Res 21: 345-351.
CA 022~2~24 l998-l0-22 PCT~P97/02323 WO 97/4120g LEGENDS TO THE FIGURES
~ Fig. 1:
Rabbit ES cells (GM3 l-ine), derived by Graves and Moreadith.
A) phase contrast microscopy of the putative ES
cells revealing a flat epitheloid phenotype B) alkaline phosphatase staining of the putative ES cells, showing a very low percentage (< 1 percent) of alkaline phosphatase positive cells (red).
Fig. 2:
A) male chimera with one black belt.
B) female chimera, showing several black belts.
The belts are typical for the Dutch Belted strain from which the GM3 ES cell line was derived.
FIg 3:
A) phase contract microscopy of a newly derived cell line using the improved cell culture and E~ derivation conditions described above.
B) alkaline phosphatase staining of a rabbit ES
cell line derived using the improved cel culture and ES derivation conditions described above. The new ES cell line is characterized by three dimensional growth, high refractibility and 80 to 90~ alkaline phosphatase positive staining.
Claims (20)
1. Rabbit embryonic stem (ES) cell line, comprising at least 70%, preferably 80 to 90%
undifferentiated cells and having the potential to generate chimeric rabbits following injection in recipient blastocysts, which cell line is obtained by isolating the inner cell mass of 5.5 days postcoitus blastocysts and culturing them on feeder cells in rabbit ES medium.
undifferentiated cells and having the potential to generate chimeric rabbits following injection in recipient blastocysts, which cell line is obtained by isolating the inner cell mass of 5.5 days postcoitus blastocysts and culturing them on feeder cells in rabbit ES medium.
2. Rabbit embryonic stem (ES) cell line as claimed in claim 1, wherein the rabbit ES medium comprises high glucose Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium, 4mM L-glutamine, 0.1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 148 units/ml penicillin G sodium, 148 microgram/ml streptomycin sulfate, 4 microgram/ml bovine insulin, 10 3 units/ml murine Leukemia Inhibitory Factor, 20% fetal bovine serum, 1.5% MEM non-essential amino acid solution.
3. Rabbit embryonic stem (ES) cell line as claimed in claims 1 or 2, wherein the feeder cells are 12.5 days old Mouse Embryonic Feeder cells in a density of 3 to 4 X 10 6 cells per 10 cm petri dish.
4. Rabbit embryonic stem (ES) cell line as claimed in claims 1, 2 or 3, wherein the ES cells are cultured over various passages and the ES cells are trypsinized before each passage with a selective trypsinization medium consisting of 0.1% collagenase, 1 chicken serum and 0.03% trypsin-EDTA in phosphate buffered saline.
5. Rabbit embryonic stem (ES) cell line as claimed in any one of the claims 1-4, characterized by three dimensional colony formation, positive staining for alkaline phosphatase and negative staining for cytokeratin 18 and vimentin after more than 10 passages.
6. Rabbit embryonic stem (ES) cell line as claimed in any one of the claims 1 to 5 for use in the generation of chimeric rabbits.
7. Rabbit embryonic stem (ES) cell lines as claimed in any one of the claims 1 to 5 for gene alteration by homologous or non-homologous recombination
8. Rabbit embryonic stem (ES) cell lines as claimed in any one of the claims 1 to 5 for the generation of rabbits with gene alteration via germline transmission.
9. Rabbit embryonic stem (ES) cell lines as claimed in claims 1 to 5 for the study or isolation of genes.
10. Use of ES cell lines according to claims 1-5 for the generation of chimeric rabbits.
11. Use as claimed in claim 10 for the generation of chimeric rabbits following blastocyst injection into recipient blastocysts or embryo aggregation or nuclear transfer.
12. Use of ES cell lines according to claims 1-5 for gene alteration by homologous or non-homologous recombination.
13. Use of ES cell lines according to claims 1-5 for the generation of rabbits with gene alteration via germline transmission.
14. Use or differentiation of cell lines according to claim 1-5 for the study or isolation of genes.
15. Rabbit ES medium, comprising high glucose Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium, 4mM L-glutamine, 0.1 mM
2-mercaptoethanol, 148 units/ml penicillin G sodium, 148 microgram/ml streptomycin sulfate, 4 microgram/ml bovine insulin, 10 3 units/ml murine Leukemia Inhibitory Factor, 20% fetal bovine serum, 1.5% MEM non-essential amino acid solution.
2-mercaptoethanol, 148 units/ml penicillin G sodium, 148 microgram/ml streptomycin sulfate, 4 microgram/ml bovine insulin, 10 3 units/ml murine Leukemia Inhibitory Factor, 20% fetal bovine serum, 1.5% MEM non-essential amino acid solution.
16. Selective trypsinization medium, consisting of 0.1% collagenase, 1% chicken serum and 0.03%
trypsin-EDTA in phosphate buffered saline.
trypsin-EDTA in phosphate buffered saline.
17. Method for producing a rabbit embryonic stem (ES) cell line, which comprises at least 70%, preferably 80 to 90% undifferentiated cells and which has the potential to generate chimeric rabbits following injection in recipient blastocysts, which method comprises the steps of isolating the inner cell mass of 5.5 days postcoitus blastocysts and culturing them on feeder cells in rabbit ES medium.
18. Method as claimed in claim 17, wherein the rabbit ES medium comprises high glucose Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium, 4mM L-glutamine, 0.1 mM
2-mercaptoethanol, 148 units/ml penicillin G sodium, 148 microgram/ml streptomycin sulfate, 4 microgram/ml bovine insulin, 103 units/ml murine Leukemia Inhibitory Factor, 20% fetal bovine serum, 1.5% MEM non-essential amino acid solution.
2-mercaptoethanol, 148 units/ml penicillin G sodium, 148 microgram/ml streptomycin sulfate, 4 microgram/ml bovine insulin, 103 units/ml murine Leukemia Inhibitory Factor, 20% fetal bovine serum, 1.5% MEM non-essential amino acid solution.
19. Method as claimed in claims 17 or 18, wherein the feeder cells are 12.5 days old Mouse Embryonic Feeder cells in a density of 3 to 4 X 10 6 cells per 10 cm petri dish.
20. Method as claimed in claims 17, 18 or 19, wherein the ES cells are cultured over various passages and the ES cells are trypsinised before each passage with a selective trypsinization medium consisting of 0.1%
collagenase, 1% chicken serum and 0.03% trypsin-EDTA in phosphate buffered saline.
collagenase, 1% chicken serum and 0.03% trypsin-EDTA in phosphate buffered saline.
Applications Claiming Priority (6)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP96201169 | 1996-04-29 | ||
EP96203060 | 1996-11-04 | ||
EP97200168.9 | 1997-01-22 | ||
EP97200168 | 1997-01-22 | ||
EP96203060.7 | 1997-01-22 | ||
EP96201169.8 | 1997-01-22 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2252524A1 true CA2252524A1 (en) | 1997-11-06 |
Family
ID=27237546
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002252524A Abandoned CA2252524A1 (en) | 1996-04-29 | 1997-04-29 | Pluripotent rabbit embryonic stem (es) cell lines and their use in the generation of chimeric rabbits |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0907722A1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2000508919A (en) |
CN (1) | CN1217746A (en) |
AU (1) | AU2892997A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2252524A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1997041209A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (25)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2002511732A (en) | 1996-10-11 | 2002-04-16 | ザ・テキサス・エイ・アンド・エム・ユニヴァーシティ・システム | Compositions and methods for generating transgenic animals |
WO1999027076A1 (en) * | 1997-11-25 | 1999-06-03 | Arc Genomic Research | Pluripotent embryonic stem cells and methods of obtaining them |
IL136347A0 (en) * | 1997-11-25 | 2001-05-20 | Arc Genomic Res | Pluripotent embryonic stem cells and methods of obtaining them |
US6238922B1 (en) * | 1999-02-26 | 2001-05-29 | Stemcells, Inc. | Use of collagenase in the preparation of neural stem cell cultures |
ATE293159T1 (en) | 1999-12-14 | 2005-04-15 | Thermo Biostar Inc | STABILIZING DILUENT FOR POLYPEPTIDES AND ANTIGENS |
CA2411914C (en) * | 2000-06-20 | 2012-08-21 | Es Cell International Pte Ltd | Method of controlling differentiation of embryonic stem (es) cells by culturing es cells in the presence of bmp-2 pathway antagonists |
DE60044301D1 (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2010-06-10 | Agronomique Inst Nat Rech | Position-independent and tissue-specific expression of a transgene in the milk of a transgenic animal |
FR2834518B1 (en) * | 2002-01-10 | 2005-03-18 | Agronomique Inst Nat Rech | METHOD FOR NUCLEAR CLONING IN RABBITS AND USES |
US8846393B2 (en) | 2005-11-29 | 2014-09-30 | Gamida-Cell Ltd. | Methods of improving stem cell homing and engraftment |
CA2782596A1 (en) * | 2009-12-01 | 2011-06-09 | National Cancer Center | Method for constructing chimeric rat using rat embryonic stem cells |
EP2511366A4 (en) | 2009-12-09 | 2014-04-30 | Univ Kyoto | Agent for promoting differentiation of pluripotent stem cells into cardiac muscle cells which includes nitrovin |
ES2727738T3 (en) | 2010-06-11 | 2019-10-18 | Regeneron Pharma | Production of fertile xy female animals from cells is xy |
US9499790B2 (en) | 2010-08-26 | 2016-11-22 | Kyoto University | Method for promoting differentiation of pluripotent stem cells into cardiac muscle cells |
CN103209968B (en) | 2010-08-26 | 2015-08-05 | 国立大学法人京都大学 | Pluripotent stem cell cardiomyocyte differentiation-promagent agent |
JP6274510B2 (en) | 2012-01-27 | 2018-02-07 | 国立大学法人京都大学 | Method for inducing myocardial differentiation of pluripotent stem cells |
EP2814950A1 (en) | 2012-02-13 | 2014-12-24 | Gamida-Cell Ltd. | Mesenchymal stem cells conditioned medium and methods of generating and using the same |
US9175266B2 (en) | 2012-07-23 | 2015-11-03 | Gamida Cell Ltd. | Enhancement of natural killer (NK) cell proliferation and activity |
US9567569B2 (en) | 2012-07-23 | 2017-02-14 | Gamida Cell Ltd. | Methods of culturing and expanding mesenchymal stem cells |
US10196609B2 (en) | 2013-03-08 | 2019-02-05 | Kyoto University | Composition for promoting cardiac differentiation of pluripotent stem cell comprising EGFR inhibitor |
WO2015037706A1 (en) | 2013-09-13 | 2015-03-19 | 国立大学法人京都大学 | Compound promoting differentiation of pluripotent stem cells into cardiomyocytes |
JP6651218B2 (en) | 2014-05-30 | 2020-02-19 | 国立大学法人京都大学 | Induction of myocardial differentiation of pluripotent stem cells using low molecular weight compounds |
SG10201911411YA (en) | 2014-06-26 | 2020-02-27 | Regeneron Pharma | Methods and compositions for targeted genetic modifications and methods of use |
SG10201913789VA (en) | 2015-09-17 | 2020-03-30 | Regeneron Pharma | Selection of pluripotent cells for production of fertile xy female mice |
WO2017159862A1 (en) | 2016-03-18 | 2017-09-21 | 国立大学法人京都大学 | Freezing method for aggregates of pluripotent stem cell-derived myocardial cells |
CN109609446B (en) * | 2018-11-14 | 2020-11-03 | 广西大学 | Culture solution and method for isolated culture of rabbit embryonic stem cells |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5166065A (en) * | 1988-08-04 | 1992-11-24 | Amrad Corporation Limited | In vitro propagation of embryonic stem cells |
US5523226A (en) * | 1993-05-14 | 1996-06-04 | Biotechnology Research And Development Corp. | Transgenic swine compositions and methods |
-
1997
- 1997-04-29 AU AU28929/97A patent/AU2892997A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1997-04-29 CA CA002252524A patent/CA2252524A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1997-04-29 WO PCT/EP1997/002323 patent/WO1997041209A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1997-04-29 JP JP9538604A patent/JP2000508919A/en active Pending
- 1997-04-29 CN CN97194183A patent/CN1217746A/en active Pending
- 1997-04-29 EP EP97922992A patent/EP0907722A1/en not_active Withdrawn
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO1997041209A1 (en) | 1997-11-06 |
CN1217746A (en) | 1999-05-26 |
JP2000508919A (en) | 2000-07-18 |
EP0907722A1 (en) | 1999-04-14 |
AU2892997A (en) | 1997-11-19 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2252524A1 (en) | Pluripotent rabbit embryonic stem (es) cell lines and their use in the generation of chimeric rabbits | |
Schoonjans et al. | Pluripotential rabbit embryonic stem (ES) cells are capable of forming overt coat color chimeras following injection into blastocysts | |
Wheeler | Development and validation of swine embryonic stem cells: a review | |
Baharvand et al. | Culture condition difference for establishment of new embryonic stem cell lines from the C57BL/6 and BALB/c mouse strains | |
Strojek et al. | A method for cultivating morphologically undifferentiated embryonic stem cells from porcine blastocysts | |
Saito et al. | Bovine embryonic stem cell-like cell lines cultured over several passages | |
Graves et al. | Derivation and characterization of putative pluripotential embryonic stem cells from preimplantation rabbit embryos | |
US6436701B1 (en) | Derivation of pluripotential embryonic cell lines from ungulate species | |
Strelchenko | Bovine pluripotent stem cells | |
Vackova et al. | Putative embryonic stem cell lines from pig embryos | |
US6107543A (en) | Culture of totipotent embryonic inner cells mass cells and production of bovine animals | |
Dattena et al. | Isolation, culture, and characterization of embryonic cell lines from vitrified sheep blastocysts | |
Zhou et al. | In vitro derivation of germ cells from embryonic stem cells in mammals | |
Sukoyan et al. | Establishment of new murine embryonic stem cell lines for the generation of mouse models of human genetic diseases | |
US6103523A (en) | Pluripotent rabbit cell lines and method of making | |
KR101213691B1 (en) | Preantral Follicle-Derived Embryonic Stem Cells | |
Anderson | Isolation and use of embryonic stem cells from livestock species | |
CA2372635A1 (en) | A process of cell reprogramming through production of a heterokaryon | |
Mizutani et al. | Propagation of senescent mice using nuclear transfer embryonic stem cell lines | |
US20070250943A1 (en) | Construction of Chimera Using En Cells | |
Modliński et al. | Embryonic stem cells: developmental capabilities and their possible use in mammalian embryo cloning | |
EP0716690A1 (en) | Rat pluripotent embryonic stem cells and method of obtaining and using same | |
Anderson | Embryonic stem cells in agricultural species | |
Strelchenko | Bovine Pluripotent stem cells for transgenic vectors | |
Kim et al. | Efficient method for generating homozygous embryonic stem cells in mice |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
FZDE | Dead |