Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Czyrnek‐Delêtre et al., 2016 - Google Patents

Is small‐scale upgrading of landfill gas to biomethane for use as a cellulosic transport biofuel economically viable?

Czyrnek‐Delêtre et al., 2016

Document ID
7484513406923284334
Author
Czyrnek‐Delêtre M
Ahern E
Murphy J
Publication year
Publication venue
Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining

External Links

Snippet

Landfill gas (with methane content of 35–55%) adds significantly to global warming if released to the atmosphere. Under the EU Landfill Directive, all landfill sites are obliged to collect this gas if supplied with biodegradable municipal waste. Landfill gas (LFG) can be (i) …
Continue reading at scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com (other versions)

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02CCAPTURE, STORAGE, SEQUESTRATION OR DISPOSAL OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG]
    • Y02C10/00CO2 capture or storage
    • Y02C10/10Capture by membranes or diffusion

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Orr Jr Carbon capture, utilization, and storage: an update
Hu et al. A review of technical advances, barriers, and solutions in the power to hydrogen (P2H) roadmap
Eldardiry et al. Carbon capture and sequestration in power generation: review of impacts and opportunities for water sustainability
Mac Dowell et al. The role of CO2 capture and utilization in mitigating climate change
Tang et al. Multicriteria environmental and economic analysis of municipal solid waste incineration power plant with carbon capture and separation from the life-cycle perspective
Patterson et al. An evaluation of the policy and techno-economic factors affecting the potential for biogas upgrading for transport fuel use in the UK
Folger Carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) in the United States
Jaramillo et al. Comparative life-cycle air emissions of coal, domestic natural gas, LNG, and SNG for electricity generation
Oh Carbon capture and storage potential in coal-fired plant in Malaysia—A review
Mousavi et al. Technical, economic, and environmental assessment of flare gas recovery system: a case study
Groesbeck et al. Coal with carbon capture and sequestration is not as land use efficient as solar photovoltaic technology for climate neutral electricity production
Sánchez et al. Exergy analysis of offshore primary petroleum processing plant with CO2 capture
Bahman et al. Review of carbon capture and storage technologies in selected industries: potentials and challenges
Huang et al. Techno-economic analysis and optimization models for carbon capture and storage: a survey
Albrecht et al. Prospects of electrofuels to defossilize transportation in Denmark–A techno-economic and ecological analysis
Bhavsar et al. The current scope and stand of carbon capture storage and utilization∼ A comprehensive review
Schjølberg et al. Small scale reformers for on-site hydrogen supply
Mintz et al. Well-to-Wheels analysis of landfill gas-based pathways and their addition to the GREET model.
Cho et al. Life-cycle energy, cost, and CO2 emission of CO2-enhanced coalbed methane (ECBM) recovery framework
Czyrnek‐Delêtre et al. Is small‐scale upgrading of landfill gas to biomethane for use as a cellulosic transport biofuel economically viable?
Ciuła et al. Energy efficiency economics of conversion of biogas from the fermentation of sewage sludge to biomethane as a fuel for automotive vehicles
Dávila et al. Preconditions for achieving carbon neutrality in cement production through CCUS
Joppert et al. A short-cut model for predicting biomethane availability after biogas upgrading
Nguyen et al. Supply chain optimization framework for CO2 capture, utilization, and storage in Germany
Gonzalez Sanchez et al. The role of direct air capture in EU’s decarbonisation and associated carbon intensity for synthetic fuels production