Lin et al., 2023 - Google Patents
FSmell: Recognizing Inline Function in Binary CodeLin et al., 2023
- Document ID
- 5827672025484382262
- Author
- Lin W
- Guo Q
- Yin J
- Zuo X
- Wang R
- Gong X
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- European Symposium on Research in Computer Security
External Links
Snippet
Function recognition is one of the most critical tasks in binary analysis and reverse engineering. However, the recognition of inline functions still remains challenging. This is mainly due to two factors. Firstly, in binaries, there exist no expert patterns, eg …
- 230000006870 function 0 abstract description 202
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F21/50—Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems
- G06F21/55—Detecting local intrusion or implementing counter-measures
- G06F21/56—Computer malware detection or handling, e.g. anti-virus arrangements
- G06F21/562—Static detection
- G06F21/563—Static detection by source code analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
- G06F8/40—Transformations of program code
- G06F8/41—Compilation
- G06F8/44—Encoding
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F21/50—Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems
- G06F21/57—Certifying or maintaining trusted computer platforms, e.g. secure boots or power-downs, version controls, system software checks, secure updates or assessing vulnerabilities
- G06F21/577—Assessing vulnerabilities and evaluating computer system security
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for programme control, e.g. control unit
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for programme control, e.g. control unit using stored programme, i.e. using internal store of processing equipment to receive and retain programme
- G06F9/44—Arrangements for executing specific programmes
- G06F9/455—Emulation; Software simulation, i.e. virtualisation or emulation of application or operating system execution engines
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for programme control, e.g. control unit
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for programme control, e.g. control unit using stored programme, i.e. using internal store of processing equipment to receive and retain programme
- G06F9/44—Arrangements for executing specific programmes
- G06F9/445—Programme loading or initiating
- G06F9/44589—Programme code verification, e.g. Java bytecode verification, proof-carrying code
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
- G06F8/40—Transformations of program code
- G06F8/41—Compilation
- G06F8/43—Checking; Contextual analysis
- G06F8/436—Semantic checking
- G06F8/437—Type checking
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
- G06F8/40—Transformations of program code
- G06F8/41—Compilation
- G06F8/42—Syntactic analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F21/50—Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems
- G06F21/52—Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems during program execution, e.g. stack integrity ; Preventing unwanted data erasure; Buffer overflow
- G06F21/54—Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems during program execution, e.g. stack integrity ; Preventing unwanted data erasure; Buffer overflow by adding security routines or objects to programs
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
- G06F8/40—Transformations of program code
- G06F8/51—Source to source
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3604—Software analysis for verifying properties of programs
- G06F11/3612—Software analysis for verifying properties of programs by runtime analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F21/50—Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems
- G06F21/51—Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems at application loading time, e.g. accepting, rejecting, starting or inhibiting executable software based on integrity or source reliability
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
- G06F8/70—Software maintenance or management
- G06F8/75—Structural analysis for program understanding
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
- G06F8/70—Software maintenance or management
- G06F8/74—Reverse engineering; Extracting design information from source code
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3668—Software testing
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F21/10—Protecting distributed programs or content, e.g. vending or licensing of copyrighted material
- G06F21/12—Protecting executable software
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
- G06F8/60—Software deployment
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Ding et al. | Asm2vec: Boosting static representation robustness for binary clone search against code obfuscation and compiler optimization | |
Haq et al. | A survey of binary code similarity | |
Hu et al. | Binary code clone detection across architectures and compiling configurations | |
Zhang et al. | Precise and accurate patch presence test for binaries | |
Eschweiler et al. | Discovre: Efficient cross-architecture identification of bugs in binary code. | |
Bao et al. | {BYTEWEIGHT}: Learning to recognize functions in binary code | |
Alrabaee et al. | BinGold: Towards robust binary analysis by extracting the semantics of binary code as semantic flow graphs (SFGs) | |
Xu et al. | VMHunt: A verifiable approach to partially-virtualized binary code simplification | |
Alrabaee et al. | Sigma: A semantic integrated graph matching approach for identifying reused functions in binary code | |
Cesare et al. | Software similarity and classification | |
Meng et al. | Identifying multiple authors in a binary program | |
Kim et al. | Refining Indirect Call Targets at the Binary Level. | |
Alam et al. | MAIL: Malware Analysis Intermediate Language: a step towards automating and optimizing malware detection | |
WO2016027641A1 (en) | Vulnerability detection device, vulnerability detection method, and vulnerability detection program | |
Bruschi et al. | Using Code Normalization for Fighting Self-Mutating Malware. | |
Thomas et al. | HumIDIFy: a tool for hidden functionality detection in firmware | |
Thakur et al. | Directed proof generation for machine code | |
Alrabaee et al. | On leveraging coding habits for effective binary authorship attribution | |
Hu et al. | A semantics-based hybrid approach on binary code similarity comparison | |
Campion et al. | Learning metamorphic malware signatures from samples | |
Van den Broeck et al. | Obfuscated integration of software protections | |
Alrabaee | A stratified approach to function fingerprinting in program binaries using diverse features | |
Alam et al. | Droidclone: Attack of the android malware clones-a step towards stopping them | |
Lin et al. | Enbindiff: Identifying data-only patches for binaries | |
Cesare et al. | Wire--a formal intermediate language for binary analysis |