@FourMalibus said in camera & lens advice - shooting outdoor sports:
@MUSASHI66 said in camera & lens advice - shooting outdoor sports:
@FourMalibus Hence why I said he should use the 2.8. I’m confused here.
You're right, but I guess by saying "2.8 is the slowest I'd go" implies that he should get something faster, but there really isn't anything faster in those focal lengths other than the 200 f2.
And it also implies that an f4 or 5.6 wouldn't work, but I think that going slower than 2.8 is fine for outdoor sports. Even the pros are using f4 and 5.6 at the extreme long end and they make it look awesome. And I showed a 6.3 image that I still shot at 1/1600 400iso which for a parent taking shots of their highschool kid I think came out fine.
F4 is more than enough when it comes to the image, with telephoto you get enough background separation and blurring. Hockey is okay for light as the ice helps brighten things up, but other sports might not do great.
Worth noting that modern bodies do so well in high ISO that you can compensate for aperture to keep the exposure triangle in a working range. Remember that you'll be stuck against a faster shutter speed for certain sports to freeze motion, so you need either ISO, Aperture, or ideally a combination to keep things balanced, especially when working with longer lenses.
If this is nothing but a hobby I would grab a good EF lens (70-200 is good, otherwise try to keep the aperture in the F4-6 range especially if you're shooting low light). A more modern Canon DSLRs will still get the job done and it's the cheapest upgrade path - it's not like professional sports photography all of a sudden jumped in quality with mirrorless, it just got easier.