Matěj Suchánek

Hi there I hope you are doing well! I wanted to say, I appreciate the fact that you reverted my edit since I make a mistake by doing that particular edit yesterday. I am not too sure why, I believe the page did had a sort of issue when I was trying to remove each of those and none of the UI box was working. I did reload the page and actually, they were all registered. My actual goal was to simply register a name, for my Agent that I am building and I hope this is not an issue. If this is the case, again It was not my intention, and I believe I was maybe too excited as usual, or I would simply say, just as naturally being enthusiast. I don't usually do any sort of damage to the page and as I said, it was to get a name with my Agent.

Have a wonderful day, best regards. ~~~ARMX86

I appreciate your message, but I did really nothing: .

Can you create one to prevent false values?

example https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q19723717&diff=prev&oldid=2264333206

If it happens too often, I think we could simply copy-paste Special:AbuseFilter/110.

Like I wrote in the other thread:

In my opinion (and experience), the problems with setting filters for individual properties are

• You need an admin to modify the filter, especially in situations when the format changes.
• They are getting more complex (due to the diff structure) when you want to cover 100% cases (modification with qualifier addition, etc.).
• We cannot really cover every property.

Please delete User:MatSuBot/Disambig errors. Taylor 49 (talk) 16:52, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Is there a particular reason? It didn't take me long, even after six years later, to find entries for fixing: and more. Isn't generating a new list what you want?

Update is equally good of course. ;-)

I can see that you started updating the page. The "particular reason" for deletion namely "list of problems relevant over 8 years ago but probably no longer now" is invalidated.

Unfortunately some wikis have the habit to contain pages that are both article and disambig. Several such faulty pages hang on Asian Championship (Q2949123) (ru, zh, ...).

Unfortunately, there isn't much we can do about these (more other problems arise). Anyways, after the first run which analyzed a subset of all disambiguation items on Wikidata, I'm now running an analysis of rozcestník stejně pojmenovaných osob (Q22808320) (new entries go to the bottom). These are generally easier to deal with.

Well ... "Wikimedia human name disambiguation page" Wikimedia human name disambiguation page (Q22808320) is currently subclass of both "Wikimedia disambiguation page" and "Wikimedia set index article" Wikimedia set index article (Q15623926).

That's true. But set indices are mostly of enwiki origin (I never understood why things need to be that complicated). And I actually skip enwiki and some other wikis that originally had too many false positives.

Set index articles allow disambiguation pages e.g. for place names, even when none of the listed items has an article

Can you exclude redirects with collegamento intenzionale a un reindirizzamento (Q70894304) badge or at least highlight them?

I will exclude them from the next run.

Thank you.

Jak založit položku (papírová) kniha, ze které jsem nasdílel velké množství dat (Lietuvos upės: B. Gailiušis, J. Jablonskis, M Kovalenkovienė, Kaunas, Lietuvos energetikos institutas, 2001 ISBN 99968-492-64-5; 789 STRAN)? Chci ji ve mnou editovaných položkách uvádět. @Martin Urbanec:

Kniha nemá internetovou verzi. Má jen jeden svazek (není vícesvazková). Má jen jedno vydání (neexistují dotisky ani opakovaná vydání).

Special:NewItem a pak podle Help:Sources#Books.

Q130353834. Děkuji. ISBN 99968-492-64-5 nelze přidat. (?)

Q130353834#P957.

Hi Matej

My contributions were deleted and now I am unable to view or edit the pages

Is there a way to restore and redo the contributions from scratch?

Thank you

Hi, I can see you created three items:

• Q125808243 (Jeevan Healthcare) reason
• Q125808543 (Your Mind At Siege) reason
• Q125808616 (David James) reason

It is possible to restore the items if you can reasonably challenge why these items meet the notability policy.