Kizar

This edit has copied the en label to the es label. That seems to be quite counterproductive to me. I'd be glad if you find a way to stop your bot producing those edits systematically. Regards, --Marsupium (talk) 22:57, 5 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi, another incorrect edit. I do not find "pilot" word in Spanish dictionary. — Ivan A. Krestinin (talk) 22:14, 7 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Dear Kizar,

It is a while ago, but in May, your bot added to the item Sudak (Q7830) a country (P17) claim that it is in Italy. It is a town on the Crimea, so I wonder how your bot came up with this idea? Although it was a Venetian and Genovese colony from the 13th to 15th century, nowadays it is part of the Ukraine. Best regards, Bever (talk) 23:23, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your bot incorrectly added date of birth (P569) to presidency of George W. Bush (Q1719918). --Yair rand (talk) 12:53, 20 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

It was imported from es.wiki long time ago. Thanks for fixing it. --Kizar (talk) 13:20, 21 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I was wondering why it:Sonja Haraldsen was marked as dead, until I realized that itwiki gets this information from Wikidata. Her false date of death was added in this edit made by KLBot2 last summer. It is actually her consecration date. --Silvonen (talk) 07:13, 25 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello Kizar,

Could you please re-run your banner bot? There are 202 banners waiting to get included into Wikivoyage.

Thanks a lot! Nicolas1981 (talk) 01:21, 28 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello, April 23 is the traditional date of death for Shakespeare, but your bot incorrectly marked it as gregorian calendar while I'm told that would be May 3.[1] How many dates did you import? Were they all from English Wikipedia? Do you have an idea of how common the error may be? Thanks for the help! --Nemo 13:55, 30 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

This item's person was born 1917 and died 1972, but in this edit, KLBot2 set the date of death to 1917. The entry ended up with P569 = P570. I'm guessing that the bot was tricked by some Wikipedian's misuse of the death date template, which for some reason included the birth date too: {{death date|1972|1|18|1917|1|8}}. Hopefully that's an isolated mistake on Wikipedia. Thanks Haplology (talk) 02:04, 2 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi! At https://www.wikidata.org/?diff=77225092&oldid=75535049#top you added a statement to a Wikimedia disambiguation page. I moved the statementds from the disambiguation page Roma people (Q7361513)      to Romani society and culture (Q4246706)      . It was the best item I could find. There is also Romani people (Q8060)      . Regards gangLeri לערי ריינהארט (talk) 20:46, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello! We have 268 banners pending transfer to Wikidata. Could you please run your bot once again? Thank you in advance! --Alexander (talk) 18:27, 19 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi, please stop adding wrong values like [2], [3], [4] and fix your edits. — Ivan A. Krestinin (talk) 12:08, 26 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

You can use your bot account for Widar editing. There'll be no rate limit using your bot. See Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive/2014/05#Flooding of Special:RecentChanges for related discussion. However, you may need a new bot approval for this.--GZWDer (talk) 12:20, 26 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

However, If you want to do many (10k+) edits, you'd better file a new bot approval. You should check the list before adding statement, otherwise your bot's flag may be removed. see Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Removal.--GZWDer (talk) 12:45, 26 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

I have found an additional instance of the bot failing to account for the difference between Gregorian and Julian calendars here. Since neither the complaint above about the Gregorian calendar, nor any other complaint mentioned on this talk page, seems to have been responded to, I have given notice at Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard#KLBot2 creating incorrect birth dates. Jc3s5h (talk) 17:03, 9 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello Kizar,

Could you please re-run your banner bot? There are 501 banners waiting to get included into Wikivoyage.

Thanks a lot! Nicolas1981 (talk) 10:45, 8 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Dear Kizar, would you be so kind to run the bot for us again? We have 200+ now. Thanks! Danapit (talk) 19:19, 25 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

There are more than 1000 now. Syced (talk) 13:18, 30 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wonderful thanks a lot Kizar! :-D Syced (talk) 02:42, 31 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hola. Me he encontrado con varios elementos marcados por ti como humanos, pero que no lo son. Solo te lo comento para que prestes más atención. No es muy normal ponerle la etiqueta de persona al Segundo viaje de Colón, por poner un ejemplo. Saludos. --Millars (talk) 17:33, 1 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Please see https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q563378&diff=51633741&oldid=28399189 fixed in https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q563378&diff=285300982&oldid=258087164 and discussed at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T122295 ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 14:00, 23 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hey there Kizar, We currently have well over a thousand banners waiting to get linked in Wikidata. Would you be so kind as to start the bot up once more? On another note, is there any chance the bot can be ran, say, every half a year? Thanks!
-- Wauteurz (talk) 20:29, 30 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello Wauteurz, sorry for the late response. I run the script yesterday. The remaining articles in the category must be fixed by hand. There are 2 issues: articles without page in Wikidata (create it manually) and articles with the banner hosted in Wikivoyage (move it to Commons). The code is awful and commented in Spanish but here it's. I can run the script again in the future if you need. Regards --Kizar (talk) 12:10, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi! Thanks for running the bot to move most of the Page Banners on Wikivoyage to Wikidata! It is very appreciated! Happy New Year to you Too! Zcarstvnz (talk) 15:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Gracias por actualizar el padrón de 2017. Podrías quitar el rank=preferred en el dato de population (P1082) de 2016? --Davidpar (talk) 18:29, 30 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hola! Vengo a pedirte lo mismo con el año 2017. Gracias :) --Davidpar (talk) 11:07, 7 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hola Davidpar, estoy trabajando en ello. => https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/KLBot2 --Kizar (talk) 11:16, 7 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi, while adding 2023 population values, you forgot to remove the preferred rank of the previous year (2022) population: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q2074405&curid=2001511&diff=2038233747&oldid=2037322141 Now there are two population values with preferred rank (2022 and 2023). Albert Villanova del Moral (talk) 12:07, 27 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Buenas, ¿qué tal? Espero que muy bien, un saludo. Sobre esta edición, creo que no es correcto poner método de determinación: oficina de Registro, de hecho da un error. Sería censo, o algo así, no una oficina. ¿Podrías cambiarlo en todos las propiedades de población? Gracias y un saludo. Vanbasten 23 (talk) 18:42, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Buenos días,

Se que el valor de esa propiedad es incorrecto. Llevo muchos años manteniendo los datos poblacionales de España y no sé que valor sería correcto.

El INE proporciona valores del Censo (cada 5 años creo) y del Padrón municipal todos los años. Los datos importados en Wikipedia son los del Padrón por actualizarse con más frecuencia.

El Padrón no tiene nada que ver con las elecciones o el censo, es un registro que llevan los ayuntamientos. Si encuentras la propiedad que tengo que poner puedo cambiarlo en todos los municipios de España. Kizar (talk) 13:29, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hola, Kizar y Vanbasten 23. Rodelar me ha avisado sobre este tema. Se me ocurre una solución más sencilla, ¿y si simplemente eliminamos lo del método de determinación? Me parece que lo único importante es que el dato proviene del Padrón de 20xx, y en todo caso el funcionamiento de ese padrón, el tipo de información que es y cómo se ha obtenido serían más bien propiedades del elemento del padrón, que resultan redundantes fuera de él. Salvo que resulte que los demás datos de poblaciones de otros países se estén introduciendo con esa (presunta) redundancia y se haya convertido en un estándar recomendado o algo así, pero lo dudo mucho... -jem- (talk) 20:12, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Muy buenas. Yo me fijaría un poco en cómo se hace en ciudades grandes. Por ejemplo Berlin (Q64) y tras ver unos cuántos casos hacer lo más completo posible. Si miráis este caso, en los últimos años viene la fecha, el método y después debajo la referencia completa. ¿Qué os parece? --Vanbasten 23 (talk) 20:41, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Pero con la importante diferencia de que en Berlín no usan un calificador «afirmado en» que apunta a un elemento propio que describe la actualización realizada y en el que se pueden incluir todos los detalles necesarios... no sé, no me acaba de convencer. -jem- (talk) 23:47, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Yo soy partidario de tener las dos propiedades. El método de determinación puede valer para distinguir entre Censo y Padrón cuando se incorporen más datos. También puede valer de filtro si se utiliza para pintar gráficos. Necesito ayuda para cambiar el valor de la propiedad "método de determinación" por otro valor que sea válido. Hay que mirar ciudades de otros paises que no usen el valor "censo". --Kizar (talk) 08:24, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi, on WikiData page "Rio Grande cutthroat trout" (Q7335249), the bot KLBot2 added and attempted to source a picture of a college building that I removed. 70.108.41.185 04:00, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

good morning. Sorry to bother you. I wanted to ask if it would be possible to add the Venetian language to the list of languages ​​supported for item descriptions and labels on wikidata?. Many thanks and thanks for your time Fierodelveneto (talk) 03:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply