Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Contingency Theory of Organizations

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance
  • 340 Accesses

Synonyms

Exigency; Turning point

Definition

Identification of the circumstances under which a particular research finding is most applicable and appropriate. Contingency theories are a response to areas in organizational studies where the environment and other factors do not allow for models to be suitable in all circumstances and situations.

Introduction

As a major organization theory literary stream, contingency theory responded to the challenges identified with both the Human Relations and Organizational humanism approaches. Contingency theorists claimed both the Classical thinkers and the Human relations approach made the same mistake through the claim that there was one best way of managing all organizations. For example, Max Weber’s classical work neglected the role of structural variables in bureaucratic organization. He and others argued that specialization and formalization were key to maximizing performance. And Frederick Taylor’s scientific management was universalistic and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blau PM, Schoenherr RA (1971) The structure of organization. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns T, Stalker GM (1961) The management of innovation. Tavistock, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cancel AE, Mitrook MA, Cameron GT (1999) Testing the contingency theory of accommodation in public relations. Public Relat Rev 25(2):171–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler AD (1962) Strategy and structure: chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Child J (1972) Organizational structure, environment and performance: the role of strategic choice. Sociology 6(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child J (1975) Managerial and organizational factors associated with company performance, Part II, A contingency analysis. J Manage Stud 12(1/2):12–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daft RL (2007) Organization theory and design. Thomson, Mason

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton DR, Todor WD, Spendolin MJ, Fielding GJ, Porter LW (1980) Organization structure and performance: a critical review. Acad Manage 5(1):49–64

    Google Scholar 

  • De Ven AH, Drazin R (1984) The concept of fit in contingency theory. Discussion Paper #19 (August). University of Minneapolis: The Strategic Management Research Center, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delery JE (1998) Issues of fit in strategic human resource management: implications for research. Hum Resour Manage Rev 8(3):289–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delery JE, Doty DH (1996) Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Acad Manage J 39(4):802–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson L (2001) The contingency theory of organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gortner HF, Nichols KL, Ball C (2007) Organization theory: a public and nonprofit perspective. Wadsworth Thomson, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest DE (1997) Human resource management and performance: a review and research agenda. Int J Hum Resour Manage 8(3):263–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Organization and environment: managing differentiation and integration. Harvard University, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüder K (1992) A contingency model of governmental accounting innovations in political –administrative environment. In: Research in governmental and non –government profit accounting. volume 7. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 99–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennings JM (1992) Structural contingency theory: a reappraisal. Res Organ Behav 14:267–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh DS, Hickson DJ (eds) (1976) Organizational structure in its context. In: The Aston Programme I (reprint ed) Saxon House, Westmead-Farnborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith MJ (1984) Contingency rules theory, context, and compliance behaviors. Hum Commun Res 10(4):489–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villoria M (2016) Contingency Theory of Leadership. In: Ali Farazmand (ed.). Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. New York: Springer International. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-52227-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom VH, Jago AG (1988) The new leadership: making participation in organizations. Prentice –Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom VH, Yetton PW (1973) Leadership and decision making. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldo D (1978) Organization theory: revisiting the elephant. Public Adm Rev 38:590–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward J (1958) Management and technology. Her majesty’s Stationery Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward J (1965) Industrial organization theory and practice. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Otenyo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Otenyo, E. (2016). Contingency Theory of Organizations. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_58-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_58-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics