Kernel methods in Quantum Machine Learning

• Agresti I, et al. (2019) Pattern recognition techniques for boson sampling validation. Phys Rev X 9:14

  Google Scholar 

• Aharonov D, Jones V, Landau Z (2006) A polynomial quantum algorithm for approximating the Jones polynomial. In: Proceedings of the 38th annual ACM symposium on theory of computing, pp 427–436

• Aïmeur, et al. (2013) Quantum speed-up for unsupervised learning. Mach Learn 90:261–287

  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Amin MH, et al. (2018) Quantum Boltzmann machine. Phys Rev X 8:11

  Google Scholar 

• Anguita D, et al. (2003) Quantum optimization for training support vector machines. Neural Netw 16:763–770

  Google Scholar 

• Arunachalam S, Wolf Ronald de (2017) A survey of quantum learning theory, arXiv:1701.06806

• Barry J, et al. (2014) Quantum partially observable Markov decision processes. Phys Rev A 90:032311

  Google Scholar 

• Benedetti M, et al. (2019) Adversarial quantum circuit learning for pure state approximation. New J Phys 21:043023

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Biamonte J, et al. (2017) Quantum machine learning. Nature 549:195–202

  Google Scholar 

• Bishop C (2016) Pattern recognition and machine learning, vol 738. Springer, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Bottarelli L, et al. (2018) Biclustering with a quantum annealer. Soft Comput 22:6247–6260

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Buhrman H, Cleve R, Watrous J, De Wolf R (2001) Quantum fingerprinting. Phys Rev Lett 87:4

  Google Scholar 

• Canabarro A, Fernandes Fanchini F, Malvezzi AL, Pereira R, Chaves R (2019) Unveiling phase transitions with machine learning. arXiv:1904.01486

• Ciliberto C, et al. (2018) Quantum machine learning: a classical perspective. Proc R Soc A: Math Phys Eng Sci 474:20170551

  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20:273–297

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Crawford D, et al. (2016) Reinforcement learning using quantum Boltzmann machines, arXiv:1612.05695

• Di Pierro A, et al. (2017) Distance kernelisation via topological quantum computation theory and practice of natural computing. Lect Notes Comput Sci 10687:269–280

  Google Scholar 

• Di Pierro A, et al. (2018) Homological analysis of multi-qubit entanglement. Europhys Lett 123:30006

  Google Scholar 

• Dong XY, Pollmann F, Zhang XF (2019) Machine learning of quantum phase transitions. Phys Rev B 99:121104

  Google Scholar 

• Dunjko V, Briegel HJ (2018) Machine learning & artificial intelligence in the quantum domain: a review of recent progress. Rep Prog Phys 81:074001

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Dunjko V, et al. (2016) Quantum-enhanced machine learning. Phys Rev Lett 117:6

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Giovannetti V, Lloyd S, Maccone L (2008) Quantum random access memory. Phys Rev Lett 100:4

  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Goldberg LA, Guo H (2017) The complexity of approximating complex-valued ising and tutte partition functions. Computational Complexity 26:765–833

  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Gray J, et al. (2018) Machine-learning-assisted many-body entanglement measurement. Phys Rev Lett 121:6

  Google Scholar 

• Harrow AW, Hassidim A, Lloyd S (2009) Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations. Phys Rev Lett 103:4

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Havlicek V, Córcoles AD, et al. (2019) Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces. Nature 567:2019–212

  Google Scholar 

• Heim B, et al. (2015) Quantum versus classical annealing of ising spin glasses. Science 348:215–217

  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Huembeli P, et al. (2019) Automated discovery of characteristic features of phase transitions in many-body localization. Phys Rev B 99:6

  Google Scholar 

• Iten R, et al. (2018) Discovering physical concepts with neural networks, arXiv:1807.10300

• Kauffman LH (1987) State models and the Jones polynomial. Topology 26:395–407

  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Levine Y, et al. (2018) Deep learning and quantum entanglement: fundamental connections with implications to network design. In: International conference on learning representations

• Li Z, Liu X, Xu N, Du J (2015) Experimental realization of a quantum support vector machine. Phys Rev Lett 114:5

  Google Scholar 

• Lloyd S, Mohseni M, Rebentrost P (2014) Quantum principal component analysis. Nat Phys 10:631–633

  Google Scholar 

• Lu S, Braunstein SL (2014) Quantum decision tree classifier. Quantum Inf Process 13:757–770

  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Mcclean JR, Romero J, Babbush R, Aspuru-Guzik A (2016) The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms. New J Phys 18:023023

  Google Scholar 

• Mercer J, et al. (1909) Functions of positive and negative type and their connection the theory of integral equations, 209 Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London

• Mikhail V, et al. (2016) Altaisky towards a feasible implementation of quantum neural networks using quantum dots. Appl Phys Lett 108:103108

  Google Scholar 

• Mitchell T (1997) Machine learning. McGraw Hill, New York

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Mohri M, et al. (2012) Foundations of machine learning, vol 432. MIT Press, Cambridge

  Google Scholar 

• Nielsen MA, Chuang IL (2011) Quantum computation and quantum information. Cambridge University Press, New York

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• O’Driscoll L, et al. (2019) A hybrid machine learning algorithm for designing quantum experiments. Quantum Mach Intell 1:1–11

  Google Scholar 

• Pachos JK (2012) Introduction to topological quantum computation. Cambridge University Press, New York

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Patrick J, et al. (2018) Coles quantum algorithm implementations for beginners, arXiv:1804.03719

• Perdomo-Ortiz A, et al. (2018) Opportunities and challenges for quantum-assisted machine learning in near-term quantum computers. Quantum Sci Technol 3:030502

  Google Scholar 

• Rebentrost P, Mohseni M, Lloyd S (2014) Quantum support vector machine for big data classification. Phys Rev Lett 113:5

  Google Scholar 

• Schuld M, Killoran N (2019) Quantum machine learning in feature Hilbert spaces. Phys Rev Lett 122:6

  Google Scholar 

• Schuld M, Petruccione F (2018) Supervised learning with quantum computers, vol 287. Springer International Publishing, Berlin

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Schuld M, Sinayskiy I, Petruccione F (2015) An introduction to quantum machine learning. Contemp Phys 56(2):172–185

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Sergioli G, et al. (2018) A quantum-inspired version of the nearest mean classifier. Soft Comput 22:691–705

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Stoudenmire E, Schwab DJ (2016) Supervised learning with tensor networks. Advances in neural information processing systems (NIPS Proceedings) 29:4799–4807

  Google Scholar 

• Suykens JAK, Vandewalle J (1999) Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neural Process Lett 9:293–300

  Google Scholar 

• Theodoridis S (2008) Pattern recognition, vol 984. Elsevier Academic Press, Cambridge

  Google Scholar 

• Wiebe N, et al. (2015) Quantum algorithms for nearest-neighbours methods for supervised and unsupervised learning. Quantum Info Comput 15:316–356

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Windridge D, Mengoni R, Nagarajan R (2018) Quantum error-correcting output codes. Int J Quantum Info 16:1840003

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Wittek P (2014) Quantum machine learning, vol 176. Elsevier Academic Press, Cambridge

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Yu S, Albarrán-Arriagada F, Retamal JC, Wang YT, Liu W, Ke ZJ, Meng Y, Li ZP, Tang JS, Solano E, Lamata L, Li CF, Guo GC (2019) . Adv Quantum Technol 2(7-8):1800074

  Google Scholar 

Download references