Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Monitoring of the urban sprawl using geoprocessing tools in the Shenzhen Municipality, China

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shenzhen, located in South China has experienced rapid urbanization over the past three decades. This paper focuses on the urban sprawl integrating remote sensing and geographic information systems (GIS). The overlay of the urban area maps for two adjacent study years was used to generate the sprawl categories map. The three main sprawl categories of infilling sprawl, edge-expansion sprawl and outlying sprawl were calculated and analyzed in regard to their distribution and change throughout different counties during the study years. The result showed that the urban area in the study region had increased dramatically from 19.55 km2 in 1979 to 894.31 km2 in 2005. The urban area centroids over the six study years transferred from southwest to northeast from 1979 to 2005. Among the study counties, the patterns of sprawl categories were markedly distinctive over different study periods. From 1979 to 2005, Shenzhen’s chief spread was outlying sprawl. Bao’an experienced the maximum sprawl within the three study counties. The findings show that studying urban sprawl can provide a method of monitoring urban area change, which, in turn, gives us a clearer perspective of urban sprawl patterns over a longer period of time. This would prove invaluable to those researchers such as land and urban planners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alig R, Healy R (1987) Urban and built-up land area changes in the United States: an empirical investigation of determinants. Land Econ 63(3):215–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antrop M (2004) Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landscape Urban Plann 67(1–4):9–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty M (2005) Agents, cells, and cities: new representational models for simulating multiscale urban dynamics. Environ Plann A 37(8):1373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berling-Wolff S, Wu J (2004) Modeling urban landscape dynamics: a case study in Phoenix, USA. Urban Ecosyst 7(3):215–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess E (1925) The growth of the city: an introduction to a research project. University of Chicago, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Camagni R, Gibelli M, Rigamonti P (2002) Urban mobility and urban form: the social and environmental costs of different patterns of urban expansion. Ecol Econ 40(2):199–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clapham W (2003) Continuum-based classification of remotely sensed imagery to describe urban sprawl on a watershed scale. Remote Sens Environ 86(3):322–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Mar López T, Aide T, Thomlinson J (2001) Urban expansion and the loss of prime agricultural lands in Puerto Rico. Ambio 30(1):49–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Doygun H, Alphan H (2006) Monitoring urbanization of Iskenderun, Turkey, and its negative implications. Environ Monit Assess 114(1):145–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing R, Pendall R, Chen D (2002) Measuring sprawl and its impact. Smart Growth America, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang S, Gertner G, Sun Z et al (2005) The impact of interactions in spatial simulation of the dynamics of urban sprawl. Landscape Urban Plan 73(4):294–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies R, Brim Box J, Symanzik J et al (2003) Effects of urbanization on the aquatic fauna of the Line Creek watershed, Atlanta-a satellite perspective. Remote Sens Environ 86(3):411–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gitas I, Mitri G, Ventura G (2004) Object-based image classification for burned area mapping of Creus Cape, Spain, using NOAA-AVHRR imagery. Remote Sens Environ 92(3):409–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris C, Ullman E (1945) The nature of cities. Ann Am Acad Political Soc Sci 242(1):7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasse J, Lathrop R (2003) A housing-unit-level approach to characterizing residential sprawl. Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 69(9):1021–1030

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmer E, Ruefenacht B (2005) Cloud-free satellite image mosaics with regression trees and histogram matching. Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 71(9):1079–1089

    Google Scholar 

  • Herold M, Scepan J, Clarke K (2002) The use of remote sensing and landscape metrics to describe structures and changes in urban land uses. Environ Plan A 34(8):1443–1458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herold M, Goldstein N, Clarke K (2003) The spatiotemporal form of urban growth: measurement, analysis and modeling. Remote Sens Environ 86(3):286–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt H (1939) The structure and growth of residential neighborhoods in American cities. Federal Housing Administration, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang S, Wang S, Budd W (2009) Sprawl in Taipei’s peri-urban zone: Responses to spatial planning and implications for adapting global environmental change. Landscape Urban Plan 90(1–2):20–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keles S, Sivrikaya F, Cakir G et al (2008) Urbanization and forest cover change in regional directorate of Trabzon forestry from 1975 to 2000 using landsat data. Environ Monit Assess 140(1–3):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Wu F (2006) Socioeconomic transformations in Shanghai (1990–2000): policy impacts in global-national-local contexts. Cities 23(4):250–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck M, Wu J (2002) A gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern: a case study from the Phoenix metropolitan region, Arizona, USA. Landscape Ecol 17(4):327–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinuzzi S, Gould W, Ramos Gonzalez O (2007) Land development, land use, and urban sprawl in Puerto Rico integrating remote sensing and population census data. Landscape Urban Plan 79(3–4):288–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milesi C, Elvidge C, Nemani R et al (2003) Assessing the impact of urban land development on net primary productivity in the southeastern United States. Remote Sens Environ 86(3):401–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitri G, Gitas I (2004) A performance evaluation of a burned area object-based classification model when applied to topographically and non-topographically corrected TM imagery. Int J Remote Sens 25(14):2863–2870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouflis G, Gitas I, Iliadou S et al (2008) Assessment of the visual impact of marble quarry expansion (1984–2000) on the landscape of Thasos Island, NE Greece. Landscape Urban Plan 86(1):92–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redman C (1999) Human dimensions of ecosystem studies. Ecosystems 2(4):296–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seto K, Fragkias M (2005) Quantifying spatiotemporal patterns of urban land-use change in four cities of China with time series landscape metrics. Landscape Ecol 20(7):871–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seto K, Liu W (2003) Comparing ARTMAP neural network with the maximum-likelihood classifier for detecting urban change. Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 69(9):981–990

    Google Scholar 

  • Song Y, Knaap G (2004) Measuring urban form: is Portland winning the war on sprawl? J Am Plan Assoc 70(2):210–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton P (2003) A scale-adjusted measure of “Urban sprawl” using nighttime satellite imagery. Remote Sens Environ 86(3):353–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrens P, Alberti M (2000) Measuring sprawl (accessed 29 August 2009). http://www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/working_papers/paper27.pdf

  • Turner M, Costanza R, Sklar F (1989) Methods to evaluate the performance of spatial simulation models. Ecol Model 48(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson J, Clay M, Martin E et al (2003) Evaluating environmental influences of zoning in urban ecosystems with remote sensing. Remote Sens Environ 86(3):303–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Loucks O (1995) From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: a paradigm shift in ecology. Q Rev Biol 70(4):439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Liu M, Zhang C et al (2007) The spatiotemporal dynamics of rapid urban growth in the Nanjing metropolitan region of China. Landsc Ecol 22(6):925–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Xian G, Klaver J et al (2003) Urban land-cover change detection through sub-pixel imperviousness mapping using remotely sensed data. Photogramm Eng Rem Sens 69(9):1003–1010

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh A, Li X (1999) Economic development and agricultural land loss in the Pearl River Delta, China. Habitat Int 23(3):373–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh A, Wu F (1996) The new land development process and urban development in Chinese cities. Int J Urban Reg 20:330–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was in part supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 5006700; No. 40871229). We would especially like to thank the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research and Guangdong Institute of Eco-environment and Soil Science for their hard work in the basic data preparation. The insightful and constructive comments of the reviewers are appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhi-feng Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lv, Zq., Wu, Zf., Wei, Jb. et al. Monitoring of the urban sprawl using geoprocessing tools in the Shenzhen Municipality, China. Environ Earth Sci 62, 1131–1141 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0602-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0602-7

Keywords

Navigation