Role of instructional technology in the transformation of higher education

• Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. Internet and Higher Education. doi:10.10160j.iheduc.2008.05.22.

• Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(3), 3–22.

  Google Scholar 

• Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., et al. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3–4), 133–136.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445–459.

  Google Scholar 

• Duderstadt, J. J., Atkins, D. E., & Van Houweling, D. (2002). Higher education in the digital age: Technology issues and strategies for American colleges and universities. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Eraut, M. (1994). Educational technology: Conceptual frameworks and historical development. In T. Huse’n & P. T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

  Google Scholar 

• Garrison, D. R. (in press). Communities of inquiry in online learning: Social, teaching and cognitive presence. In C. Howard, et al. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distance and online learning. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

• Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-Learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. London: Routledge/Falmer.

  Google Scholar 

• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.

  Google Scholar 

• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157–172.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2000). A transactional perspective on teaching-learning: A framework for adult and higher education. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

  Google Scholar 

• Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133–148.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. (2008). Blended learning in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  Google Scholar 

• Grineski, S. (1999). Questioning the role of technology in higher education: Why is this the road less travelled. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(1), 45–54.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gunawardena, C. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferencing. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2–3), 147–166.

  Google Scholar 

• Hastings, N. B., & Tracey, M. W. (2005). Does media affect learning: Where are we now? TechTrends, 49(2), 28–30.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Howard, A. B. (2004). American studies and the new technologies: New paradigms for teaching and learning. Rethinking History, 8(2), 277–291.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works. Change, July/August, 27–35.

• Kesim, E., & Agaoglu, E. (2007). A paradigm shift in distance education: Web 2.0 and social software. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 8(3), 66–75. Retrieved February 23, 2009 from: http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde27/pdf/article_4.pdf.

  Google Scholar 

• Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179–211.

  Google Scholar 

• Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Maloney, E. (2007). What Web 2.0 can teach us about learning. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(18), B26.

  Google Scholar 

• Merrill, M. D. (2002). Effective use of instructional technology requires educational reform. Educational Technology, 17(2), 13–18.

  Google Scholar 

• Meyer, K. A. (2003). Face-to-face versus threaded discussions: The role of time and higher-order thinking. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 55–65.

  Google Scholar 

• Meyer, K. A., & Xu, Y. J. (2007). A Bayesian analysis of the institutional and individual factors influencing the faculty technology use. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 184–195.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Murphy, E. (2004). Identifying and measuring ill-structured problem formulation and resolution in online asynchronous discussions. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 30(1), 5–20.

  Google Scholar 

• Nagy, J., & Bigum, C. (2007). Bounded and unbounded knowledge: Teaching and learning in a Web 2 world. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 8(3), 76–86. Retrieved February 23, 2009 from: http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde27/pdf/article_5.pdf.

  Google Scholar 

• Nworie, J. (2007). Academic technology in higher education: Organizing for better results. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35(1), 105–128.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved December 17, 2008 from: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html.

• Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 21–40.

  Google Scholar 

• Reigeluth, C. M., & Joseph, R. (2002). Beyond technology integration: The case for technology transformation. Educational Technology, 17(2), 9–12.

  Google Scholar 

• Reiser, R. A. (2007). A history of instructional design and technology. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 17–34). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

  Google Scholar 

• Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68–88.

  Google Scholar 

• Rogers, P., & Lea, M. (2005). Social presence in distributed group environments: The role of social identity. Behavior & Information Technology, 24(2), 151–158.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Saettler, P. (2004). The evolution of American educational technology. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

  Google Scholar 

• Salinas, M. F. (2008). From Dewey to Gates: A model to integrate psychoeducational principles in the selection and use of instructional technology. Computers & Education, 50(3), 652–660.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Salomon, G. (2002). Technology and pedagogy: Why don’t we see the promised revolution? Educational Technology, 17(2), 71–75.

  Google Scholar 

• Schrire, S. (2004). Interaction and cognition in asynchronous computer conferencing. Instructional Science, 32, 475–502.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shea, P., & Bidjeramo, T. (2008, March). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.

• Shea, P., Li, C., Swan K., & Pickett, A. (2005). Developing learning community in online asynchronous college courses: The role of teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(4). Retrieved May 1, 2008 from: http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v9n4/v9n4_shea.asp.

• Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. Toronto: Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

• Sullivan, K. (2008). The case for hands-on education. Strategy+Business, 52. Retrieved September 22, 2008 from: http://www.strategy-business.com/press/article/08303?gko=d1e76-1876-27125602.

• Swan, K. (2002). Building communities in online courses: The importance of interaction. Education, Communication and Information, 2(1), 23–49.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Swan, K. (2003). Developing social presence in online discussions. In S. Naidu (Ed.), Learning and teaching with technology: Principles and practices (pp. 147–164). London: Kogan Page.

  Google Scholar 

• Swan, K., & Shih, L.-F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 115–136.

  Google Scholar 

• Vaughan, N., & Garrison, D. R. (2006). How blended learning can support a faculty development community of inquiry. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(4), 139–152.

  Google Scholar 

• Wu, D., & Hiltz, S. R. (2004). Predicting learning from asynchronous online discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(2), 139–152.

  Google Scholar 

Download references