Abstract
Urban ecological networks are defined differently in ecology, urban planning and landscape ecology, but they all have linearity and linkage in common. Early urban representations evolved from the constraints of deep ecological structure in the landscape to built elements that must work around natural linear obstacles—rivers, coastlines, dunes, cliffs, hills and valley swamps. Village commons were linked by roads. The Industrial Revolution led to accelerating urban growth, where the role of open space focussed on public health and transport. The Renaissance, Baroque and Picturesque movements accentuated networks in wooded parks, boulevards and sweeping riverine vistas. These provided a new aesthetic and sense of grandeur in the urban centres of European empires and later their colonies. Grafted onto this visual connectivity has been an awakened ecological understanding of spatial dynamics. The emergent notion of ecological corridor functionality provided support for green linear features, although initially this was based on untested theory. The idea of organisms moving along green highways seemed logical, but only recently has unequivocal empirical evidence emerged that demonstrates this functionality. Nevertheless, the main role of corridors may be to provide habitat rather than to act as connectors of nodal habitats. Most organisms can utilise stepping stones, and these may accommodate desired meta-populations while deterring pest movement. Swale drains and treatment wetlands provide riparian services and serve as biodiversity corridors. However, to most people the obvious function is visual—providing green fingers through what would otherwise be urban grey. The health benefits of these are have been demonstrated to be psychological as much as biophysical.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvey A (2006) Promoting and preserving biodiversity in the urban forest. Urban For Urban Green 5:195–201
Arnberger A (2006) Recreation use of urban forests: an inter-area comparison. Urban For Urban Green 4:135–144
Beatley T (2000) Green urbanism. Island, Washington, DC
Beier P, Noss RF (1998) Do habitat corridors provide connectivity? Conserv Biol 12:1241–1252
Bengston D, Yeo-Chang Y (2005) Seoul’s greenbelt: an experiment in urban containment. In: Bengston DN (ed) Policies for managing urban growth and landscape change: a key to conservation in the 21st century (Gen Tech Rep NC-265). US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St. Paul, pp 27–34
Beverage C, Rocheleau P (1995) Frederick Law Olmsted: designing the American Landscape. Rizzoli, New York
Breuste J (2007) Urban soil sealing—key indicator for urban ecological functionality and ecological planning. In: 25 years of landscape ecology: scientific principles in practice (Proc 7th IALE World Congress): part 1. IALE, Wageningen, pp 197–198
Dawson D (1994) Are habitat corridors conduits for animals and plants in a fragmented landscape (English Nature Res Rep 94). English Nature, Peterborough
Dramstad W, Olson J, Forman R (1996) Landscape ecology principles in landscape architecture and land-use planning. Island Press, Harvard University
Dubyago (1963) Russian regular parks and gardens. Stroisdat, Leninigrad (in Russian)
Dunnett N, Kingsbury N (2004) Planting green roffs and living walls. Timber, Portland
Fabos J (1995) Introduction and overview: the greenway movement, uses and potentials of greenways. Landsc Urban Plan 33:1–13
Faggi A, Ignatieva M (2009) Urban green spaces in Buenos Aires and Christchurch. Municipal Eng 162:241–250
Florgärd C (2009) Planning for preservation of original natural vegetation in cities. In: Graber D, Birmingham K (eds) Urban planning in the 21st century. Nova Science, Hauppauge, pp 1–25
Gobster PH, Nassauer JI, Daniel TC, Fry G (2007) The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landsc Ecol 2:959–972
Hoskins R (2008) Re-thinking urban environments and health. Public Health Advisory Committee, Wellington
Hough M (1995) Cities and natural process. Rutledge, London
Ignatenko M, Gavrilov G, Karpov L (1980) Forest-parks of Leningrad. Stroiisdat, Leningrad (in Russian)
Ignatieva M (2002) Ecopolis—search for sustainable cities in Russia. In: Brebbia C, Martin-Duque J, Wadhwa L (eds) The sustainable city II: urban regeneration and sustainability. WIT, Boston, pp 53–61
Ignatieva M, Golosova E (2009) Sustainable practice of landscape architecture in the socialist era in Russia: what we can learn from it? In: Proceedings of (CD ROM) 46th IFLA World Congress on Green Infrastructure: High Performance Landscapes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 21–23 October 2009
Ignatieva M, Stewart G (2009) Homogeneity of urban biotopes and similarity of landscape design language in former colonial cities. In: McDonnell MJ, Hahs A, Breuste J (eds) Ecology of cities and towns: a comparative approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 399–421
Ignatieva M, Meurk C, van Roon M, Simcock R, Stewart G (2008a) Urban greening manual. How to put nature in our neighbourhoods: application of low impact urban design and development (LIUDD) principles, with a biodiversity focus, for New Zealand developers and homeowners (Landcare Res Sci Ser no. 35). Manaaki Whenua, Lincoln
Ignatieva M, Stewart G, Meurk C (2008b) Low impact urban design and development (LIUDD): matching urban design and urban ecology. Landsc Rev 12:60–73
Kuznetsov E, Ignatieva M (2003) St. Petersburg forest greenbelt status report. Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute, Hoersholm
McHarg I (1969) Design with nature. Doubleday–Natural History, New York
Memmott J, Alonso D, Berlow E, Dobson A, Dunne J, Sole R, Weitz J (2005) Biodiversity loss and ecological network structure. In: Pascual M, Dunne J (eds) Ecological networks: linking structure to dynamics in food webs. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 325–347
Meurk C, Hall G (2006) Option for enhancing forest biodiversity across New Zealand’s managed landscapes based on ecosystem modelling and spatial design. N Z J Ecol 30:131–146
Meurk CD, McMurtrie S (2006) Socio-ecological lessons from 15 years of waterway restoration in New Zealand. In: Proc (CD ROM) New Zealand Waste and Water Assoc Stormwater Conf, Rotorua, New Zealand, 4–5 May 2006
Meurk C, Palang H (2005) The power of plants—plants as power (abstract). In: Abstr Eur IALE Congr 2005, Faro, Portugal, 29 March–2 April 2005, p 82
Meurk CD, Lucas Associates, Barker R (1997) Streamside planting guide. Christchurch City Council
Mihova J, Ignatieva M (2001) View of landscape design history as an art and cultural phenomenon in New Zealand. In: Anagnostopoulos G (ed) Art and landscape (Proc IFLA Symp, Athens, Greece, 8–10 Sept 1998). International Federation of Landscape Architects/Panhellenic Association of Landscape Architects/Panayotis and Effie Michelis Foundation, Athens, pp 153–159
Natuhara Y (2006) Landscape evaluation for ecosystem planning. Landsc Ecol Eng 2:3–11
Open Space Seattle 2100 Project (2006) Envisioning Seattle’s green future. Department of Landscape Architecture, College of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Washington, Seattle
Rogers E (2001) Landscape design: a cultural and architectural history. Harry N. Abrams, New York
Sanesi G, Lafortezza R, Bonnes M, Carrus G (2006) Comparison of two different approaches for assessing the psychological and social dimensions of green areas. Urban For Urban Green 5:121–129
Searns R (1995) The evolution of greenways as an adaptive urban landscape form. Landsc Urban Plan 33:65–80
Sorensen A (2002) The making of urban Japan: cities and planning from Edo to the twenty-first century. Routledge, London
Sotoudehnia F, Comber A (2010) Poverty and environmental justice: a GIS analysis of urban greenspace accessibility for different economic groups. In: 13th AGILE Int Conf on Geographic Information Science, Guimaraes, Portugal, 10–14 May 2010
Strongman T (1999) City beautiful: the first 100 years of the Christchurch beautifying association. Clerestory, Christchurch
Swaffield SR, Meurk C, Ignatieva M (2009) Urban biodiversity in New Zealand: issues, challenges and opportunities. In: Hedfors P (ed) Urban naturmark i landskapet—en syntes genom landskapsarkitektur (Urban nature in the landscape). Festskrift till Clas Florgård (Rapportserien no. 3/09). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Urban and Rural Development, Unit for Landscape Architecture, Uppsala, pp 105–132
Taylor J, Paine C, FitzGibbon J (1995) From greenbelt to greenways: four Canadian case studies. Landsc Urban Plan 33:47–64
Thompson C (2002) Urban open space in the 21st century. Landsc Urban Plan 60:59–72
Turner T (1995) Greenways, blueways, skyways and other ways to a better London. Landsc Urban Plan 33:269–282
Tzoulas K, Korpela K, Venn S, Yli-Pelkonen V, Kāzmierczak A, Niemela J, James P (2007) Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review. Landsc Urban Plan 81:167–178
Walmsley A (1995) Greenways and the making of urban form. Landsc Urban Plan 33:81–127
Yang J, Jinxing Z (2007) The failure and success of greenbelt program in Beijing. Urban For Urban Green 6:287–296
Yang J, McBride J, Zhou J, Sun Z (2005) The urban forest in Beijing and its role in air pollution reduction. Urban For Urban Green 3:65–78
Zhang S (1990) The forest and urban greening in Shanghai. In: Sukopp H, Hejny S (eds) Urban ecology: plants and plant communities in urban environments. SPB Academic, The Hague, pp 141–153
Zube E (1995) Greenways and US National Park System. Landsc Urban Plan 33:17–25
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ignatieva, M., Stewart, G.H. & Meurk, C. Planning and design of ecological networks in urban areas. Landscape Ecol Eng 7, 17–25 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-010-0143-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-010-0143-y