Estimation of the Parameters of Wakeby Distribution by a Numerical Least Squares Method and Applying it to the Annual Peak Flows of Turkish Rivers

• Ahmad MI, Sinclair CD, Spurr BD (1988) Assessment of flood frequency models using empirical distribution function statistics. Water Resour Res 24(8):1323–1328

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Greenwood JA, Landwehr JM, Matalas NC, Wallis JR (1979) Probability weighted moments: definition and relation to parameters of several distributions expressable in inverse form. Water Resour Res 15(5):1049–1054

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Griffiths GA (1989) A theoretically based Wakeby distribution for annual flood series. Hydrol Sci 34(3):231–248

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Grubbs F, Beck G (1972) Extension of sample sizes and percentage points for significance tests of outlying observations. Technometrics 14(4):847–854

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Haktanir T (1992) Comparison of various flood frequency distributions using annual flood peaks data of rivers in Anatolia. J Hydrol 136:1–31

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Haktanir T, Horlacher HB (1993) Evaluation of various distributions for flood frequency analysis. Hydrol Sci 38(1):15–32

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Haktanir T, Bozduman A (1995) A study on sensitivity of the probability-weighted moments method on the choice of the plotting position formula. J Hydrol 168:265–281

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hosking JRM (2000) Research report Fortran routines for use with the method of L-moments. Version 3.03, IBM Research Division, New York, p 33

• Hosking JRM, Wallis JR (1997) Regional frequency analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York, p 224

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Houghton JC (1978) Birth of a parent: the Wakeby distribution for modeling flood flows. Water Resour Res 14(6):1105–1109

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Karamouz M, Abesi O, Moridi A, Ahmadi A (2009) Development of optimization schemes for floodplain management; a case study. Water Resour Manage 23(9):1743–1761

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kumar A, Chander S (1987) Statistical flood frequency analysis: an overview. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on flood frequency and risk analyses, hydrologic frequency modelling. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, pp 19–35

  Google Scholar 

• Landwehr JM, Matalas NC, Wallis JR (1979a) Probability weighted moments compared with some traditional techniques in estimating Gumbel parameters and quantiles. Water Resour Res 15(5):1055–1064

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Landwehr JM, Matalas NC, Wallis JR (1979b) Estimation of parameters and quantiles of Wakeby distributions 1. Known lower bounds. Water Resour Res 15(6):1361–1372

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Moharram SH, Gosain AK, Kapoor PN (1993) A comparative study for the estimators of the generalized Pareto distribution. J Hydrol 150:169–185

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Öztekin T (2007) Wakeby distribution for representing annual extreme and partial duration rainfall series. Meteorol Appl 14(4):381–387

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (1992) Numerical recipes in Fortran. Cambridge University Press, New York, p 963

  Google Scholar 

• Rao AR, Arora PS (1987) An empirical study of probability distributions of annual maximum floods. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on flood frequency and risk analyses, hydrologic frequency modelling. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, pp 449–465

  Google Scholar 

• Rao AR, Hamed KH (2000) Flood frequency analysis. CRC Press, New York, p 350

  Google Scholar 

• Sinclair CD, Spurr BD, Ahmad MI (1987) Modified Anderson-Darling test. Technical report, Department of Mathematics Science, St. Andrews University, St. Andrews, Fife, Scotland

• The MathWorks Inc. (2005) MATLAB Release 7.1. Natick, MA

• Vogel RM, McMahon TA, Chiew FHS (1993) Flood flow frequency model selection in Australia. J Hydrol 146:421–449

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zalina MD, Desa MNM, Nguyen VTV, Kassim AHM (2002) Selecting a probability distribution for extreme rainfall series in Malaysia. Water Sci Technol 45(2):63–68

  Google Scholar 

Download references