Anticipating technological breakthroughs: Using bibliographic coupling to explore the nanotubes paradigm

• Ansoff, I. (1984), Implanting Strategic Management, Prentice Hall International, New Jersey.

  Google Scholar 

• Brown W., Jin, S., Zhu, W. (2001), In-Situ Nano-Interconnected Circuit Devices and Method for Making the Same, US patent 6,297,063 full text.

• Dosi, G. (1988), The nature of the innovative process, In: G Dosi et al. (Eds), Technical Change and Economic Theory, Pinter, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Dosi, G. (1982), Technical paradigms and technological trajectories, Research Policy, 11(3): 147–162.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Egghe, L., Rousseau, R. (2002), Co-citation, bibliographic coupling and a characterization of lattice citation networks, Scientometrics, 55: 349–361.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Glänzel, W. (2003), Bibliometrics as a Research Field, K.U. Leuven, F.E.T.E.W.: Leuven.

  Google Scholar 

• Glänzel, W., Czerwon, H. J. (1996), A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level, Scientometrics, 37: 195–221.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hicks, D. (1987), Limitations of co-citation analysis as a tool for science policy, Social Studies of Science, 17: 295–316.

  Google Scholar 

• Katz, J. S., Stewart, S., Gow, T. A. K., Martin, B. (2001), Science Foresight Project Final Report, Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire: Defense Science and Technology Laboratory UK. www.sussex.ac.uk.Units/spru/foresight

  Google Scholar 

• Kessler, M. M. (1963), Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers, American Documentation, 14: 10–25.

  Google Scholar 

• Kuusi, O. (1999), Expertise in the Future Use of Generic Technologies, Government Institute for Economic Research (VATT), Doctoral thesis, Helsinki, B 59.

• Kuusi, O., Meyer M. (2002), Technological generalizations and leitbilder — the anticipation of technological opportunities, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 69: 625–639.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Luzzi, D., Smith B. (2005), Hybrid Materials and Methods for Producing the Same, US patent 6,863,857.

• Marshakova, I. V. (1973), System of connections between documents based on references (as the Science Citation Index), Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya, Seriya 2, (6): 3–8 (in Russian).

• Marz, L., Dierkes, M. (1994), Leitbildprägung und Leitbildgestaltung, In: G. Bechmann, T. Petermann (Eds), Intedisziplinäre Technikforschung, Genese, Folgen, Diskurs. Campus, Frankfurt/M, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Mau, A. et al. (2005), Patterned Carbon Nanotube Films, US patent 6,811,957 full text.

• Merkerk, R., van Lente, H. (2005), Tracing emerging irreversibilities in emerging technology: the case of nanotubes, Report from the EU-US seminar: New Technology Foresight, Forecasting & Assessment Methods, Seville 13–14 May 2004.

• Meyer, M. (2000), What is special about patent citations? Differences between patent and scientific citations, Scientometrics, 49: 93–123.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Meyer, M., Kuusi, O. (2004), Nanotechnology: Generalizations in an Interdisciplinary Field of Science and Technology, HYLE — International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 10(2): 155–170.

  Google Scholar 

• Persson, O. (1994), The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986–1990, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(1): 31–38.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rueckes, T., Segal, B. (2004), Methods of Nanotube Films and Articles, US patent 6,835,591 full text.

• Rueckes, T. et al. (2000), Carbon nanotube-based nonvolatile random access memory for molecular computing, Science, 289: 94–97.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schmoch U. (1993), Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicators, Scientometrics, 26: 193–211.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schmoch, U. (1997), Indicators and the relations between science and technology, Scientometrics, 38: 103–116.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sen, S. K., Gan, S. K. (1983), A mathematical extension of the idea of bibliographic coupling and its applications, Annals of Library Science and Documentation, 30: 78–82.

  Google Scholar 

• Sharabchiev, J. T. (1988), Comparative analysis of two methods of cluster analysis of bibliographic references, Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya, Seriya 2, (4): 25–28 (in Russian).

• Small, H. (1973), Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24: 265–269.

  Google Scholar 

• Small, H. (1978), Cited documents as context symbols, Social Studies of Science, 8: 327–240.

  Google Scholar 

• Small, H. (1982), Citation context analysis, Progress in Communication, Science, 3: 287–310.

  Google Scholar 

• Small, H. (1988), A general framework for general large-scale maps of science in two or three dimensions: The SciViz system, Scientometrics, 41: 125–133.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vladutz, G., Cook, J. (1984), Bibliographic coupling and subject relatedness, In: Challenges to an Information Society, Proceedings of the 47th ASIS Annual Meeting (compiled by B. Flood, J. Witiak, T. H. Hogan), White Plains: Knowledge Industry Publications, 204–207.

  Google Scholar 

• von Wartburg, I., Teichert, T., Rost, K. (2005), Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis, Research Policy, 34(10): 1591–1607.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references