Strategies affecting Twitter-based networking pattern of South Korean politicians: social network analysis and exponential random graph model

• Barabási A.L., Albert E.: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286, 509–512 (1999)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Benkler Y.: The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press, New Haven (2007)

  Google Scholar 

• Bimber B.: The study of information technology and civic engagement. Political Commun 17(4), 329–333 (2000)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Borgatti S.P., Mehra A., Brass D.J., Labianca G.: Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323, 892–895 (2009)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bosker, B.: Twitter: we now have over 200 million accounts (update). Huffpost Tech. Retrieved May 26, 2011, from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/28/twitter-number-of-users_n_855177.html (2011)

• Burkett, T., Skvoretz, J.: Political support networks among US senators: stability and change from 1973–1990. Unpublished manuscript. http://web1.cas.usf.edu/MAIN/include/0-1201-000/polsupportnet.pdf (2001)

• Chang W.: The cyber balkanization and structural transformation of the public sphere in Korea. J. Contemp. East. Asia. 7(2), 29–48 (2008)

  Google Scholar 

• Chi, F., Yang, N.: Twitter adoption in congress. Rev. Netw. Econ. 10(1) (2011). http://www.bepress.com/rne/vol10/iss1/3

• Dahlgren P.: The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: dispersion and deliberation. Political Commun 22(2), 147–162 (2005)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Doreian P.,Teuter K., Wang C.: Network autocorrelation models: some monte carlo results. Sociol. Methods Res. 13(2), 155–200 (1984)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fowler J.H.: Connecting the congress: a study of cosponsorship networks. Political Anal 14(4), 456–487 (2006)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Glassman, M.E., Straus, J.E., Shogan, C.J.: Social networking and constituent communication: member use of Twitter during a two-month period in the 111th congress. Congressional Research Reservice. http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/R41066_20100203.pdf (2010)

• Granovetter M.: Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am. J. Sociol. 91(3), 481–510 (1985)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Habermas J.: Political communication in media society: does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Commun. Theory 16(4), 411–426 (2006)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hansen D., Shneiderman B., Smith M.A.: Social Media: New Technologies of Collaboration. Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL: Insights from a Connected World, pp. 11–39. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2010)

  Google Scholar 

• Highfield T., Kirchhoff L., Nicolai T.: Challenges of tracking optical discussion networks online. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 29((3), 340–353 (2011)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hindman M.: The Myth of Digital Democracy. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2009)

  Google Scholar 

• Hogan B.: The presentation of self in the age of social media: distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc. 20(6), 377–386 (2010)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Holland P.W., Leinhardt S.: Holland and Leinhardt reply: some evidence on the transitivity of positive interpersonal sentiment. Am. J. Sociol. 77(6), 1205–1209 (1972)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hsu C., Park H.W.: Sociology of hyperlink networks of Web 1.0, Web 2.0, and Twitter: a case study of South Korea. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 29(3), 354–368 (2011)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Jansen B., Zhang M., Sobel K., Chowdury A.: Twitter power: tweets as electronic word of mouth. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 60(11), 2169–2188 (2009)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kim J.H., Barnett G.A., Park H.W.: A hyperlink and issue network analysis of the United States senate: a rediscovery of Web as a relational and topical medium. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 61(8), 1598–1611 (2010)

  Google Scholar 

• Kim M.J., Park H.W.: Measuring Twitter-based political participation and deliberation in the South Korean context by using social network and triple helix indicators. Scientometrics 90(1), 121–140 (2012)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Korea Internet Security Agency: Internet usage statistics. http://isis.kisa.or.kr/sub02/?pageId=020200# (2011)

• Leenders R.T.A.J.: Modeling social influence through network autocorrelation: constructing the weight matrix. Social Netw. 24(1), 21–47 (2002)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Monge P.R., Contractor N.S.: Theories of Communication Networks. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)

  Google Scholar 

• Moody J., White D.R.: Structural cohesion and embeddedness: a hierarchical concept of social groups. Am. Soc. Rev. 68(1), 103–127 (2003)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Naaman, M., Boase, J., Lai, C.: Is it really about me? Message content in social awareness streams. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Savannah, pp. 189–192. ACM, New York (2010)

• Newsweek: Who’s winning the Twitter wars? http://www.newsweek.com/2009/09/08/who-s-winning-the-twitter-wars.html (2009)

• OikoLab: Twitter Korean index. http://tki.oiko.cc/ (2010)

• Park H.W., Lee Y.O.: The Korean presidential election of 2007: five years on from the “internet election”. J. Contemp. East. Asia. 7(1), 1–4 (2008)

  Google Scholar 

• Park H.W., Kluver R.: Trends in online networking among South Korean politicians. Gov. Inf. Q. 26(3), 505–515 (2009)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Park H.W., Thelwall M.: Link analysis: hyperlink patterns and social structure on politicians’ web sites in South Korea. Qual. Quant. 42(5), 687–697 (2008)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Park H.W., Kim C.S., Barnett G.A.: Socio-communicational structural among political actors on the web in South Korea. New Media Soc 6(3), 403–423 (2004)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Park S.J., Lim Y.S., Sams S., Nam S.M., Park H.W.: Networked politics on Cyworld: the text and sentiment of Korean political profiles. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 29(3), 288–299 (2011)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Peng W., Sharpe K., Robins G.L., Pattison P.E.: Exponential random graph (p*) models for affiliation networks. Soc. Netw. 31(1), 12–25 (2009)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Plotkowiak, T., Ebermann, J., Stanoevska-Slabeva, K.: A longitudinal social network analysis of German politicians’ Twitter accounts. In: Proceedings of Sunbelt Annual Conference, Riva del Garda (2010)

• Podolny J.M.: Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. Am. J. Sociol. 107(1), 33–60 (2001)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Robins G., Pattison P., Kalish Y., Lusher D.: An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Soc. Netw. 29(2), 173–191 (2007)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Shumate M., Lipp J.: Connective collective action online: an examination of the hyperlink network structure of an NGO issue network. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 14(1), 178–201 (2008)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Smith, A.: 22% of online Americans used social networking or Twitter for politics in 2010 campaign. Pew Research Center. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Politics-and-social-media.aspx (2011)

• Sunstein C.R.: Republic.com 2.0.. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2007)

  Google Scholar 

• Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T.O., Sandner, P.G., Welpe, I.M.: Predicting elections with Twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Washington, DC (2010)

• Wasserman S., Faust K.: Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, New York (1994)

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Web Ecology Project: The Iranian election on Twitter: the first eighteen days. http://www.webecologyproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/WEP-twitterFINAL.pdf (2009)

• Wilson R.K., Young C.D.: Cosponsorship in the United States congress. Legislative Stud. Q. 22(1), 24–43 (1997)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zhang Y., Friend A.J., Traud A.L., Porter M.A., Folwer J.H., Mucha P.J.: Community structure in congressional cosponsorship networks. Phys. A 387(7), 1705–1712 (2008)

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zhao, D., Rosson, M.B.: How and why people Twitter: the role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work, Sanibel Island, pp. 243–252. ACM, New York (2009)

Download references