Evaluation of electronic assessment systems within the USA and their ability to meet the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) Standard 2

• AASCU. (n.d.) AASCU College Accountability Policy Priorities. Retrieved from http://www.congressweb.com/aascu/collegeaccountability.htm.

• CAEP (2013). CAEP accreditation standards. Retrieved from http://caepnet.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/final_board_approved1.pdf.

• CAEP (2014). CAEP evidence guide. Retrieved from http://caepnet.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/caep_evidence_guide1.pdf.

• Cavanaugh, T., Cavanaugh, C., Daniels, L., et al. (2005). A journey of design: developing a technology based unit assessment system: designing and implementing a teacher education unit assessment system. In C. Crawford (Ed.), Proceedings of society for information technology and teacher education international conference 2005 (pp. 40–46). Chesapeake: AACE.

  Google Scholar 

• Cibulka, J.G. (2012). How the use of data will transform educator preparation. The Newsletter of the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education, 21(2). Retrieved from http://www.ncate.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=xBeteqTC1pM%3D&tabid=523.

• Cibulka, J., LaCelle-Peterson, M., Benbow, C., Poda, J., Rigden, D., & Eldridge, D. (2012). CAEP/NCATE/TEAC:A Workshop on Standards-Setting for Our Profession, retrieved from http://ncate.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=SNDMQKSFgqM%3d&tabid=391.

• Dee, T. S., & Jacob, B. A. (2010). The impact of no child left behind on students, teachers, and schools. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2010(2), 149–194. Retrieved March 15, 2011, from Project MUSE database.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Educational Testing Service:KY (n.d.). Overview of Kentucky testing requirements. Retrieved from http://www.ets.org/praxis/ky.

• Educational Testing Service:TX (n.d.) Overview of Texas testing requirements. Retrieved from http://www.ets.org/praxis/tx.

• Grant, R. W., & Keohane, R. O. (2005). Accountability and abuses of power in world politics. American Political Science Review, 99, 29–43. doi:10.1017/S0003055405051476.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Greenberg, J., & Walsh, K. (2010). Evaluating the fundamentals of teacher training programs in Texas, National Council on Teacher Quality. Retrieved from http://www.nctq.org/edschoolreports/texas/docs/executive_summary.pdf.

• Hebert, D. M. (2007). Innovation in Teacher Education: Faculty Members’ and Assessment Coordinators’ Perceptions of Electronic Assessment Systems. Retrieved from http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-11062007-181936/.

• Holmes Partnership. (n.d.). Holmes Partnership – History. Retrieved from http://www.holmespartnership.org/about/history.cfm.

• Jackson, J. (2006). Increasing accountability for teacher preparation programs, Southern Regional Accreditation Board, Retrieved from http://publications.sreb.org/2006/06E18_Increasing_Accountability.pdf.

• Ma, X. (2005). Building an accountability system for teacher education: an actor-network approach. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, United States - Maryland. Retrieved December 4, 2009, from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text. (Publication No. AAT 3237664).

• National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future | Strategies | Assure Quality Teacher Preparation. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.nctaf.org/strategies/assure/index.htm.

• National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2008). Professional Standards for Accreditation of Teacher Preparation Institutions. Retrieved from http://www.ncate.org/documents/standards/NCATE%20Standards%202008.pdf.

• No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107–110, § 115, Stat. 1425 (2002).

• Noell, G. H., & Burns, J. L. (2006). Value-added assessment of teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(1), 37–50. doi:10.1177/0022487105284466.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Owsiak, N. (2008). Teacher quality accountability measures: perceptions of degree and direction of influence on university-based teacher education programs. Ed.D. dissertation, The George Washington University, United States - District of Columbia. Retrieved October 12, 2009, from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text.(Publication No. AAT 3296990).

• Reusser, J., Butler, L., Symonds, M., Vetter, R., & Wall, T. J. (2007). An assessment system for teacher education program quality improvement. International Journal of Educational Management, 21(2), 105–113.

  Google Scholar 

• RiCharde, S. R., (n.d.). Data management and data management tools. Retrieved September 9, 2011 from http://usfweb2.usf.edu/assessment/Resources/Data%20Management%20and%20Data%20Management%20Tools.pdf.

• Sanders, W. L., & Horn, S. P. (1998). Research findings from the Tennessee value-added assessment system (TVAAS) database: implications for educational evaluation and research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12(3), 247–256.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sanders, W. L., & Rivers, J. C. (1996). Cumulative and Residual Effects of Teachers on Future Student Academic Achievement. Retrieved July 13, 2011 from http://www.mccsc.edu/~curriculum/cumulative%20and%20residual%20effects%20of%20teachers.pdf.

• Sandoval, P., & Wigle, S. (2006). Building a unit assessment system: creating quality evaluation of candidate performance. Education, 126(4), 640–652.

  Google Scholar 

• Schulte, L., Danielson, L., Conway, D., & Clark, P. (2006). Avoiding the pitfalls: a comprehensive approach to meeting NCATE’s standard 2. Online Submission, Retrieved from ERIC database.

• Sivakumaran, T., Holland, G., Wishart, W., Heynig, K., & Flowers-Gibson, B. (2010). Electronic assessment systems: implementation, maintenance and support. Focus on Colleges, Universities, and Schools, 4, 1.

  Google Scholar 

• Slavin, R. E. (2007). Educational research in an age of accountability. Boston: Pearson.

  Google Scholar 

• Stoulig, D. (2009). Teacher education preparation assessment system and the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education accreditation. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Southern Mississippi, United States - Mississippi. Retrieved from Dissertations & Theses: Full Text.(Publication No. AAT 3396130).

• Subedi, B. R., Swan, B., & Hynes, M. C. (2011). Are school factors important for measuring teacher effectiveness? A multilevel technique to predict student gains through a value-added approach. Educational Research International, 2011, 1–10.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Teacher preparation: reforming the uncertain profession—remarks of Secretary Arne Duncan at Teachers College, Columbia University. (2009). Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/2009/10/10222009.html.

• Wineburg, M. S. (2006). Evidence in teacher preparation: establishing a framework for accountability. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(1), 51–64. doi:10.1177/0022487105284475.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zou, J., De Vaney, C., & Wang, Y. (2009). A meta-modeling framework to support accountability in Business process modeling. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 20, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-01112-2.

Download references