Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Looking at the IPO from the “top floor”: a literature review

  • Published:
Journal of Management and Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article aims to assess the current situation and the evolution of the literature on the role of top level decision-makers in initial public offerings. The article combines bibliometric and qualitative reviews of 147 articles published in 57 journals until 2015. Findings show that the debate on the role of top-level decision-makers in initial public offerings has followed an irregular pathway. Research attention has moved from studies on the actors and the dynamics of going public to a focus on the strategic implications of initial public offerings. The paper is a good starting point for future policy-making interventions designed to support top-level decision-making. By enhancing awareness of the strategic role of initial public offerings, we hope to improve the governance practices associated with them. The paper also sheds light on the importance of fostering the corporate transparency of top-level decision-making in firms going public, as an additional tool to increase investors’ trust and attract financial resources. Finally, the paper provides a comprehensive overview of the academic field, examining research trends and the evolutionary pattern. It also suggests future research avenues by identifying un(der)explored issues to advance knowledge on the topic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In line with previous literature, “intellectual structure” of the field means the structure of the research field described by the main research subfields and the related topics/themes, the relationships among them and the authors who played a pivotal role in developing the research field (Nerur et al. 2008; Ramos-Rodríguez and Ruíz-Navarro 2004).

References

  • Abdi, H., & Valentin, D. (2007). Multiple correspondence analysis. In N. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aerts, W., & Cheng, P. (2011). Causal disclosures on earnings and earnings management in an IPO setting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(5), 431–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, R. K., Krigman, L., & Womack, K. L. (2002). Strategic IPO underpricing, information momentum, and lockup expiration selling. Journal of Financial Economics, 66(1), 105–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alavi, A., Pham, P. K., & Pham, T. M. (2008). Pre-IPO ownership structure and its impact on the IPO process. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(11), 2361–2375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aria M, Cuccurullo C (2017) bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics 11(4), 959–975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthurs, J. D., Hoskisson, R. E., Busenitz, L. W., & Johnson, R. A. (2008). Managerial agents watching other agents: Multiple agency conflicts regarding underpricing in IPO firms. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 277–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M., & Gompers, P. A. (2003). The determinants of board structure at the initial public offering. Journal of Law and Economics, 46(2), 569–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bancel, F., & Mittoo, U. R. (2009). Why do European firms go public? European Financial Management, 15(4), 844–884.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebchuk, L. A., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The state of corporate governance research. Review of Financial Studies, 23(3), 939–961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, C. M., & Burton, M. D. (2008). Founding the future: Path dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO. Organization Science, 19(1), 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bédard, J., Coulombe, D., & Courteau, L. (2008). Audit committee, underpricing of IPOs, and accuracy of management earnings forecasts. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(6), 519–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. G., Moore, C. B., & Filatotchev, I. (2012). Strategic and institutional effects on foreign IPO performance: Examining the impact of country of origin, corporate governance, and host country effects. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 197–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benninga, S., Helmantel, M., & Sarig, O. (2005). The timing of initial public offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 75(1), 115–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertoni, F., Meoli, M., & Vismara, S. (2014). Board independence, ownership structure and the valuation of IPOs in Continental Europe. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(2), 116–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borenstein, M. (1997). Comprehensive meta-analysis. Englewood, NJ: Biostat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, W., & Tarnai, C. (1999). Content analysis in empirical social research. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(8), 659–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bova, F., Minutti-Meza, M., Richardson, G., & Vyas, D. (2014). The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Exit Strategies of Private Firms. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(3), 818–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brau, J. C., Francis, B., & Kohers, N. (2003). The choice of IPO versus takeover: Empirical evidence. The Journal of Business, 76(4), 583–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, M. J., & Franks, J. (1997). Underpricing, ownership and control in initial public offerings of equity securities in the UK. Journal of Financial Economics, 45(3), 391–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., Chahine, S., & Filatotchev, I. (2009). Founders, private equity investors, and underpricing in entrepreneurial IPOs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(4), 909–928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M. A., Pollock, T. G., & Leary, M. M. (2003). Testing a model of reasoned risk-taking: Governance, the experience of principals and agents, and global strategy in high-technology IPO firms. Strategic Management Journal, 24(9), 803–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Certo, S. T. (2003). Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: Signaling with board structures. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 432–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Certo, S. T., Holcomb, T. R., & Holmes, R. M. (2009). IPO research in management and entrepreneurship: Moving the agenda forward. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1340–1378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chahine, S., Filatotchev, I., & Zahra, S. A. (2011). Building perceived quality of founder-involved IPO firms: Founders’ effects on board selection and stock market performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(2), 319–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chahine, S., & Saade, S. (2011). Shareholders’ rights and the effect of the origin of venture capital firms on the underpricing of US IPOs. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(6), 601–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chahine, S., & Tohmé, N. S. (2009). Is CEO duality always negative? An exploration of CEO duality and ownership structure in the Arab IPO context. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(2), 123–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charitou, A., Louca, C., & Panayides, S. (2007). Cross-listing, bonding hypothesis and corporate governance. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 34(7–8), 1281–1306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chemmanur, T. J., & Paeglis, I. (2005). Management quality, certification, and initial public offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 76(2), 331–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. S., Lin, W. C., Chang, S. C., & Lin, C. Y. (2013). Information uncertainty, earnings management, and long-run stock performance following initial public offerings. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 40(9–10), 1126–1154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheon, Y. S., Kim, M., & Hwang, M. (2011). Post-initial public offering earnings management driven by insider selling motives: Using KOSDAQ initial public offerings. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 40(5), 627–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chok, J. I., & Sun, Q. (2007). Determinants of idiosyncratic volatility for biotech IPO firms. Financial Management, 36, 107–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cirillo, A., Romano, M., & Ardovino, O. (2015a). Does family involvement foster IPO value? Empirical analysis on Italian stock market. Management Decision, 53(5), 1125–1154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cirillo, A., Romano, M., & Pennacchio, L. (2015b). All the power in two hands: The role of CEOs in family IPOs. European Management Journal, 33(5), 392–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, W. S., & Devlin, S. J. (1988). Locally weighted regression: An approach to regression analysis by local fitting. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(403), 596–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombelli, A. (2015). Top management team characteristics and firm growth: Evidence from a sample of listed companies. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 21(1), 107–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, M. G., Croce, A., & Murtinu, S. (2014). Ownership structure, horizontal agency costs and the performance of high-tech entrepreneurial firms. Small Business Economics, 42(2), 265–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutchley, C. E., Garner, J. L., & Marshall, B. B. (2002). An examination of board stability and the long-term performance of initial public offerings. Financial Management, 31, 63–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuccurullo C, Aria M, Sarto F (2016) Foundations and trends in performance management. A twenty-five years bibliometric analysis in business and public administration domains. Scientometrics 108(2), 595–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily, C. M., Certo, S. T., Dalton, D. R., & Roengpitya, R. (2003). IPO underpricing: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(3), 271–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1999). Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 674–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, A., & Mussolino, D. (2014). Exploring what makes family firms different: Discrete or overlapping constructs in the literature? Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(2), 169–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deeds, D. L., DeCarolis, D., & Coombs, J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities and new product development in high technology ventures: An empirical analysis of new biotechnology firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(3), 211–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, Y., & Ross, T. W. (2003). You are known by the directors you keep: Reputable directors as a signaling mechanism for young firms. Management Science, 49(8), 1003–1017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Y., Nowak, E., & Zhang, H. (2010). Foreign vs. domestic listing: An entrepreneurial decision. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(2), 175–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durisin, B., & Puzone, F. (2009). Maturation of corporate governance research, 1993–2007: An assessment. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 266–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst & Young. (2009). Beyond borders: Global biotechnology report.

  • Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law & Economics, 26(2), 301–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J. P., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, T. (2007). Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and Post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(2), 330–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farag, H., Mallin, C., & Ow-Yong, K. (2014). Governance, ownership structure, and performance of entrepreneurial IPOs in AIM companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(2), 100–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Alles, M., & Ramos-Rodríguez, A. (2009). Intellectual structure of human resources management research: A bibliometric analysis of the Journal of Human Resource Management, 1985–2005. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 161–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, L. C., & Karpoff, J. M. (2002). Takeover defenses of IPO firms. The Journal of Finance, 57(5), 1857–1889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev, I., & Bishop, K. (2002). Board composition, share ownership, and ‘underpricing’of UK IPO firms. Strategic Management Journal, 23(10), 941–955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev, I., Wright, M., & Arberk, M. (2006). Venture capitalists, syndication and governance in initial public offerings. Small Business Economics, 26(4), 337–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, A. (2010). Conducting research literature reviews. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furrer, O., Thomas, H., & Goussevskaia, A. (2008). The structure and evolution of the strategic management field: A content analysis of 26 years of strategic management research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerasymenko, V., & Arthurs, J. D. (2014). New insights into venture capitalists’ activity: IPO and time-to-exit forecast as antecedents of their post-investment involvement. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(3), 405–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovannini, R. (2010). Corporate governance, family ownership and performance. Journal of Management and Governance, 14(2), 145–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartzell, J. C., Kallberg, J. G., & Liu, C. H. (2008). The role of corporate governance in initial public offerings: Evidence from real estate investment trusts. Journal of Law and Economics, 51(3), 539–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, B. (2011). The performance and the effects of family control in North African IPOs. International Review of Financial Analysis, 20(3), 140–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, M. C., & Gulati, R. (2003). Getting off to a good start: The effects of upper echelon affiliations on underwriter prestige. Organization Science, 14(3), 244–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibbotson, R. G., Sindelar, J. L., & Ritter, J. R. (1988). Initial public offerings. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 1(2), 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insch, G. S., Moore, J. E., & Murphy, L. D. (1997). Content analysis in leadership research: Examples, procedures, and suggestions for future use. The Leadership Quarterly, 8, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, B. A., Jayaraman, N., & Kini, O. (2008). The path-to-profitability of Internet IPO firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(2), 165–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, W. Q., Witt, M. A., Zattoni, A., Talaulicar, T., Chen, J. J., Lewellyn, K., et al. (2015). Corporate governance and IPO underpricing in a cross-national sample: A multilevel knowledge-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 36(8), 1174–1185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kor, Y. Y., & Mahoney, J. T. (2005). How dynamics, management, and governance of resource deployments influence firm-level performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(5), 489–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, K., & Strömsten, T. (2012). Going public: The role of accounting and shareholder value in making sense of an IPO. Management Accounting Research, 23(3), 186–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, S., & Braun, M. R. (2010). To IPO or not to IPO: Risks, uncertainty and the decision to go public. British Journal of Management, 21(3), 666–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le, S. A., Kroll, M. J., & Walters, B. A. (2013). Outside directors’ experience, TMT firm-specific human capital, and firm performance in entrepreneurial IPO firms. Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 533–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebart, L., Morineau, A., & Warwick, K. M. (1984). Multivariate descriptive statistical analysis: correspondence analysis and related techniques for large matrices. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. W. (1999). Using qualitative methods in organizational research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, K., Li, J., Hesterly, W., & Cannella, A. (2012). Top management team tenure and technological inventions at post-IPO biotechnology firms. Journal of Business Research, 65(9), 1349–1356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., Fang, F., & Esqueda, O. A. (2012). The overseas listing puzzle: Post-IPO performance of Chinese stocks and ADRs in the US market. Journal of multinational financial management, 22(5), 193–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsilio, M., Cappellaro, G., & Cuccurullo, C. (2011). The intellectual structure of research into PPPS: A bibliometric analysis. Public Management Review, 13(6), 763–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGilvery, A., Faff, R., & Pathan, S. (2012). Competitive valuation effects of Australian IPOs. International Review of Financial Analysis, 24, 74–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. B., Bell, R. G., Filatotchev, I., & Rasheed, A. A. (2012). Foreign IPO capital market choice: Understanding the institutional fit of corporate governance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(8), 914–937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousa, F. T., Marlin, D., & Ritchie, W. J. (2013). Configurations of slack and their performance implications: An examination of high-tech IPOs. Management Decision, 51(2), 225–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, R., & Treichel, M. Z. (2005). Cash crisis in newly public Internet-based firms: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(4), 543–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. (2003). The persistence of founder influence: Management, ownership, and performance effects at initial public offering. Strategic Management Journal, 24(8), 707–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerur, S. P., Rasheed, A. A., & Natarajan, V. (2008). The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: An author co-citation. Strategic Management Journal, 29(3), 319–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsson, U. (2013). Do less regulated markets attract lower quality firms? Evidence from the London AIM market. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 22(3), 335–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagano, M., Panetta, F., & Zingales, L. (1998). Why do companies go public? An empirical analysis. The Journal of Finance, 53(1), 27–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, G. T., Moore, C. B., Bell, R. G., & Zachary, M. A. (2013). Signaling organizational virtue: an examination of virtue rhetoric, country-level corruption, and performance of foreign IPOs from emerging and developed economies. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(3), 230–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popescu, M., & Xu, Z. (2011). Co-managers, information, and the secondary market liquidity of initial public offerings. Financial Management, 40(1), 199–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugliese, A., Bezemer, P. J., Zattoni, A., Huse, M., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Boards of directors’ contribution to strategy: A literature review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 292–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Rodríguez, A.-R., & Ruíz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 981–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashman, L., Withers, E., & Hartley, J. (2009). Organizational learning and knowledge in public service organizations: A systematic review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(4), 463–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revest, V., & Sapio, A. (2013). Does the alternative investment market nurture firm growth? A comparison between listed and private companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(4), 953–979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, J. R. (1984). The “hot issue” market of 1980. Journal of Business, 57(2), 215–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, J., & Welch, I. (2002). A review of IPO activity, pricing, and allocations. Journal of Finance, 57, 1795–1828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosenboom, P., & Schramade, W. (2006). The price of power: Valuing the controlling position of owner–managers in French IPO firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(2), 270–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saggese, S., Sarto, F., & Cuccurullo, C. (2016). Evolution of the debate on control enhancing mechanisms: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(4), 417–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shekhar, C., & Stapledon, G. (2007). Governance structures of initial public offerings in Australia. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(6), 1177–1189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih, K. H., Lin, C. W., Huang, H. T., & Chiang, W. C. (2008). Market information feedback for the high-tech dominated IPO companies. International Journal of Technology Management, 43(1–3), 76–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, S. B., & Zutter, C. J. (2003). Control as a motivation for underpricing: A comparison of dual and single-class IPOs. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(1), 85–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchard, J. A. (2009). The impact of venture capital backing on the corporate governance of Australian initial public offerings. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(4), 765–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudarsanam, S., Wright, M., & Huang, J. (2011). Target bankruptcy risk and its impact on going private buyout performance and exit. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(3), 240–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teoh, S. H., Welch, I., & Wong, T. J. (1998). Earnings management and the long-run market performance of initial public offerings. The Journal of Finance, 53(6), 1935–1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Bommel, J. (2002). Messages from market to management: The case of IPOs. Journal of Corporate Finance, 8(2), 123–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., & Ligon, J. A. (2009). The underpricing of insurance IPOs. Financial Management, 38(2), 301–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welbourne, T. M., & Cyr, L. A. (1999). The human resource executive effect in initial public offering firms. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 616–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Q., Zimmerman, M., & Jiang, C. (2011). An empirical study of the impact of CEO characteristics on new firms’ time to IPO. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(2), 163–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, Y. H., Shu, P. G., & Guo, R. J. (2008). Ownership structure and IPO valuation—Evidence from Taiwan. Financial Management, 37(1), 141–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zattoni, A., & Cuomo, F. (2008). Why adopt codes of good governance? A comparison of institutional and efficiency perspectives. Corporate governance: An international review, 16(1), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zattoni, A., & Judge, W. (2012). Corporate governance and initial public offerings: An international perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. A. (2008). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on the capital raised through an initial public offering. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(3), 391–414.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Professor Corrado Cuccurullo for his fruitful comments on the methodology. All errors remain the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, University of Foggia, Largo Papa Giovanni Paolo II, 1, 71121, Foggia, Italy

    Alessandro Cirillo

  2. Department of Economics, Management, Institutions, University of Naples “Federico II”, Via Cinthia, 45 Monte S. Angelo, 80126, Naples, Italy

    Donata Mussolino, Sara Saggese & Fabrizia Sarto

Authors
  1. Alessandro Cirillo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Donata Mussolino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sara Saggese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fabrizia Sarto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Cirillo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cirillo, A., Mussolino, D., Saggese, S. et al. Looking at the IPO from the “top floor”: a literature review. J Manag Gov 22, 661–688 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-017-9397-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-017-9397-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation