Analysis of Temporal Characteristics of Collaborative Knowledge Construction in Teacher Workshops

• Baek, S. I., & Kim, Y. M. (2015). Longitudinal analysis of online community dynamics. Industrial Management and Data Systems,115(4), 661–677. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-09-2014-0266.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centered learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review,5(3), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.001.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Barkley, E. F., & Major, C. H. (2005). Collaborative learning techniques: a handbook for college faculty. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series,56(4), 328–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/104515950301400412.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.

  Google Scholar 

• Chieu, V. M., & Herbst, P. (2016). A study of the quality of interaction among participants in online animation-based conversations about mathematics teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education,57, 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.010.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning: From design to orchestration. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. Jong, et al. (Eds.), Technology enhanced learning: Principles and products (pp. 3–19). New York: Springer.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2006). Designing integrative scripts. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, et al. (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 275–301). New York: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Duncan-Howell, J. (2010). Teachers making connections: Online communities as a source of professional learning. British Journal of Educational Technology,41(2), 324–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00953.x.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fosnot, C. T., & Perry, R. S. (2005). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives and practice (pp. 8–33). New York: Teacher College Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications,1, 147–166. https://doi.org/10.31274/etd-180810-507.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2010). The high cost of low educational performance: The Long-run economic impact of improving PISA outcomes. Paris: OECD Publishing.

  Google Scholar 

• Herrmann, K. J. (2013). The impact of cooperative learning on student engagement: Results from an intervention. Active Learning in Higher Education,14(3), 175–187.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hill, A. G., Srinivasa, S., Hawken, S. J., Barrow, M., Farrell, S. E., & Hattie, J. (2012). Impact of a resident-as-teacher workshop on teaching behaviour of interns and learning outcomes of medical students. Journal of Graduate Medical Education,4(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-11-00062.1.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Holmquist, P. O. (2015). Theorizing teaching and learning: Pre-service teachers’ theoretical awareness of learning. European Journal of Teacher Education,38(1), 102–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2014.902437.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ida, B. N. M. (2017). Promoting primary school teachers’ competence through dynamic interactive workshop and partnership. International Journal of Linguistics: Language and Culture,3(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v3i1.335.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Keogh, E. (2005). Datamining and machine learning in time series database. In Proceedings of the 5th industrial conference on data mining.

• Liesel, E., Tilda, L., Irma, E., & Ronél, F. (2015). In-service teacher training to provide psychosocial support and care in high-risk and high-need schools: School-based intervention partnerships. Journal of Education for Teaching,41(3), 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2015.1044226.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lin, S. (2004). The application of practice teaching model based on workshops. Modern Education Forum,3, 67–78.

  Google Scholar 

• Lin, S. Y., & Xie, Y. (2017). Effects of tag cloud-anchored group discussions on pre-service teachers’ collaborative knowledge construction. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,33(2), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2885.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Loes, C. N., An, B. P., Saichaie, K., & Pascarella, E. T. (2017). Does collaborative learning influence persistence to the second year of college? Journal of Higher Education,88(1), 62–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.1243942.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lucas, R. I., Promentilla, M. A., Ubando, A., Tan, R. G., Aviso, K., & Yu, K. D. (2017). An AHP-based evaluation method for a teacher training workshop on information and communication technology. Evaluation and Program Planning,63, 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.04.002.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Matijević, M., Topolovčan, T., & Rajić, V. (2017). Teacher assessment related to the use of digital media and constructivist learning in primary and secondary education. Croatian Journal of Education,19(2), 563–603.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Muñiz-Rodríguez, L., Velázquez, P. A., Muñiz, L. J. R., & Valcke, M. (2016). Is there a gap in initial secondary mathematics teacher education in Spain compared to other countries? Revista De Educacion,372, 111–132.

  Google Scholar 

• Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions (pp. 47–87). Cambridge: University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Prichard, A., & Woollard, J. (2010). Psychology for the classroom: Constructivism and social learning. London: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Rustaman, N. Y., Rusdiana, D., Efendi, R., & Liliawati, W. (2017). The workshop program on authentic assessment for science teachers. Journal of Physics Conference Series,812, 012062.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sang, Y. C. (2017). The design, implementation, and evaluation of Korean k-12 teacher training workshops. Journal of the National Council of Less Commonly Taught Languages,21, 145–167.

  Google Scholar 

• Scott, J. (2012). What is social network analysis?. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

  Google Scholar 

• Shankar, R., Orion, N., King, C., Warrier, A. K., Narahari, A. M., & Swamy, S. G. S. (2017). Teacher training workshops in India—A report. Journal of the Geological Society of India,89(2), 217–219.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Skrypnyk, O., Joksimovic, S., Kovanovic, V., Gasevic, D., & Dawson, S. (2015). Roles of course facilitators, learners, and technology in the flow of information of a cMOOC. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning,16(3), 188–217. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2170.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stahl, G. (2000). A model of collaborative knowledge building. In International conference of the learning sciences (Vol. 113, pp. 201–212). MIT Press.

• Taylor, G. W., Fergus, R., Lecun, Y., & Bregler, C. (2010). Convolutional learning of spatiotemporal characteristics. In European conference on computer vision (Vol. 6316, pp. 140–153). Springer.

• Thompson, L. M., Uyeda, K., Wright, J., & Halfon, N. (2005). Family support: Fostering leadership and partnership to improve access and quality (building state early comprehensive systems series, number 14). Los Angeles: National Centre for Infant and Early Childhood Health Policy.

  Google Scholar 

• Valtonen, T., Sointu, E., Kukkonen, J., Kontkanen, S., Lambert, M. C., & Mäkitalo-Siegl, K. (2017). TPACK updated to measure pre-service teachers’ twenty-first-century skills. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,33(3), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3518.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vuopala, E., Hyvönen, P., & Järvelä, S. (2016). Interaction forms in successful collaborative learning in virtual learning environments. Active Learning in Higher Education,17(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787415616730.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wise, A. F., Zhao, Y., Hausknecht, S., & Chiu, M. M. (2014). Temporal considerations in analyzing and designing online discussions in education: examining duration, sequence, pace, and salience. Assessment and Evaluation of Time Factors in Online Teaching and Learning,2, 198–231. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4651-3.ch008.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Xie, K., & Ke, F. (2011). The role of students' motivation in peer-moderated asynchronous online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology,42(6), 916–930. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01140.x.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Xie, K., Yu, C., & Bradshaw, A. C. (2014). Impacts of role assignment and participation in asynchronous discussions in college-level online classes. Internet and Higher Education,20(1), 10–19.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Yilmaz, K. (2008). Constructivism: Its theoretical underpinnings, variations, and implications for classroom instruction. Educational Horizons,86(3), 161–172.

  Google Scholar 

• Zhang, S., Liu, Q., Chen, W., Wang, Q., & Huang, Z. (2017). Interactive networks and social knowledge construction behavioral patterns in primary school teachers' online collaborative learning activities. Computers and Education,104, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.011.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zhang, S., Liu, Q., & Xiong, J. (2015). Research on teacher workshop training model from the perspective of cognitive apprenticeship. China Educational Technology,8, 114–120.

  Google Scholar 

Download references