Abstract
Establishing protected areas is one of the most widely used tools for biodiversity conservation, but the effectiveness of this is disputed. We used satellite-based maps of land cover to compare forest cover and rate of forest loss before and after 28 Mexican protected areas were decreed. Forest cover declined over time, both inside and outside reserves, but the loss was lowest in designated core areas. No significant difference was found in the mean rate of change in forest cover between external buffer, decreed areas and areas not yet decreed. There was also no significant difference in forest loss among protected areas before and after being decreed. The centre of protected areas (whether or not it corresponds to core areas) had a lower rate of forest cover loss. Population and road density was significantly lower within than outside protected areas and in regulated core areas than in the rest of the area. Isolation from the boundary appears to reduce deforestation as much as the presence of regulated core areas, illustrating the importance of size and design and the importance of protecting large areas with adequate core areas for a more effective conservation management.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- MSS:
-
Multi spectral scanning
- ETM:
-
Enhanced thematic mapper
- INE:
-
Institito Nacional de Ecología (National Institute of Ecology)
- GIS:
-
Geographic information system
- INEGI:
-
Institututo Nacional de Estadística e Informática (National Institute of Statistics and Informatic)
References
Asner GP (2001) Cloud cover in Landsat observations of the Brazilian Amazon. Int J Remote Sens 22:3855–3862
Bhagwat S, Brown N, Evans T, Jennings S, Savill P (2001) Parks and factors in their success. Science 293:1045
Brook BW, Sodhi NS, Ng PKL (2003) Catastrophic extinctions follow deforestation in Singapore. Nature 424:420–423
Brooks TM, Pimm SL, Kapos V, Ravilious C (1999) Threat from deforestation to montane and lowland birds and mammals in insular South-east Asia. J Anim Ecol 68:1061–1078
Bruner AG, Gullison RE, Rice RE, da Fonseca GAB (2001) Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science 291:125–128
Cairns MA, Haggerty PK, Alvarez R, De Jong BHJ, Olmsted I (2000) Tropical Mexico’s recent land-use change: a region’s contribution to the global carbon cycle. Ecol Appl 10:1426–1441
Castillo A, Toledo VM (2000) Applying ecology in the Third World: The case of Mexico. Bioscience 50:66–76
Chape S, Spalding M, Jenkins M (2008) The world’s protected areas. Status, values and prospects in the twenty-first century. University of California Press, Berkeley
Cohen WB, Fiorella M, Gray J, Helmer E, Anderson K (1998) An efficient and accurate method for mapping forest clearcuts in the Pacific Northwest using Landsat imagery. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 64:293–300
Conabio (2009) Capital Natural de México, Volumen II
Curran LM, Trigg SN, McDonald AK, Astiani D, Hardiono YM, Siregar P, Caniago I, Kasischke E (2004) Lowland forest loss in protected areas of Indonesian Borneo. Science 303:1000–1003
DeFries R, Hansen A, Newton AC, Hansen MC (2005) Increasing isolation of protected areas in tropical forests over the past twenty years. Ecol Appl 15:19–26
Dirzo R, Garcia CM (1992) Rates of Deforestation in Los Tuxtlas, a neotropical area in Southeast Mexico. Conserv Biol 6:84–90
Enriquez-Andrade R, Anaya-Reyna G, Barrera-Guevara JC, Carvajal-Moreno MD, Martinez-Delgado ME, Vaca-Rodriguez J, Valdes-Casillas C (2005) An analysis of critical areas for biodiversity conservation in the Gulf of California Region. Ocean Coast Manag 48:31–50
Geoghegan J, Villar SC, Klepeis P, Mendoza PM, Ogneva-Himmelberger Y, Chowdhury RR, Turner BL, Vance C (2001) Modeling tropical deforestation in the southern Yucatan peninsular region: comparing survey and satellite data. Agric Ecosyst Environ 85:25–46
Hayes DJ, Sader SA, Schwartz NB (2002) Analyzing a forest conversion history database to explore the spatial and temporal characteristics of land cover change in Guatemala’s Maya Biosphere Reserve. Landsc Ecol 17:299–314
INEGI (2000) Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e Informática, Red de Carreteras 1:250, 0000, México
INEGI (2002) Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e Informática, “Localidades de la República Mexicana, 2000”. Obtenido de Principales Resultados por Localidad. XII Censo de Población y Vivienda 2000. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO), editor
Ite UE, Adams WM (1998) Forest conversion, conservation and forestry in Cross River State, Nigeria. Appl Geogr 18:301–314
Jensen JR (1995) Introductory digital image processing: a remote sensing perspective. Prentice Hall, Saddle River
Jensen JR (2000) Remote sensing of the environment: an earth resource perspective. Prentice Hall, Saddle River
Joppa LN, Loarie SR, Pimm SL (2008) On the protection of ‘protected areas’. PNAS 105:6673–6678
Kintz DB, Young KR, Crews-Meyer KA (2006) Implications o land use/land cover change in the buffer zone of a National Park in the Tropical Andes. Environ Manag 38:238–252
Kleinn C, Corrales L, Morales D (2002) Forest area in Costa Rica: a comparative study of tropical forest cover estimates over time. Environ Monit Assess 73:17–40
Liu JG, Linderman M, Ouyang ZY, An L, Yang J, Zhang HM (2001) Ecological degradation in protected areas: the case of Wolong Nature Reserve for giant pandas. Science 292:98–101
Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253
Mendoza E, Dirzo R (1999) Deforestation in Lacandonia (southeast Mexico): evidence for the declaration of the northernmost tropical hot-spot. Biodivers Conserv 8:1621–1641
Myers N (1992) The primary source: Tropical Forests and our future. Norton, New York
Naughton-Treves L, Buck Holland M, Brandon K (2005) The role of protected areas in conserving biodiversity and sustaining local livelihoods. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:219–252
Nepstad D, Schwartzman S, Bamberger B, Santilli M, Ray D, Schlesinger P, Lefebvre P, Alencar A, Prinz E, Fiske G, Rolla A (2006) Inhibition of Amazon deforestation and fire by parks and indigenous lands. Conserv Biol 20:65–73
Peres CA (2005) Why we need megareserves in Amazonia. Conserv Biol 19:728–733
Rodrigues ASL, Andelman SJ, Bakarr MI, Boitani L, Brooks TM, Cowling RM, Fishpool LDC, da Fonseca GAB, Gaston KJ, Hoffmann M, Long JS, Marquet PA, Pilgrim JD, Pressey RL, Schipper J, Sechrest W, Stuart SN, Underhill LG, Waller RW, Watts MEJ, Yan X (2004) Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428:640–643
Rodriguez JP, Rodriguez-Clark KM (2001) Even ‘paper parks’ are important. Trends Ecol Evol 16:17–18
Sader SA, Joyce AT (1988) Deforestation rates and trends in Costa Rica, 1940 to 1983. Biotropica 20(1):11–19
Sader SA, Hayes DJ, Hepinstal JA, Coan M, Soza C (2001) Forest change monitoring of a remote biosphere reserve. Int J Remote Sens 22:1937–1950
Sanchez-Azofeifa GA, Rivard B, Calvo J, Moorthy I (2002) Dynamics of tropical deforestation around national parks: Remote sensing of forest change on the Osa Peninsula of Costa Rica. Mountain Res Dev 22:352–358
Sanchez-Azofeifa GA, Daily GC, Pfaff ASP, Busch C (2003) Integrity and isolation of Costa Rica’s national parks and biological reserves: examining the dynamics of land-cover change. Biol Conserv 109:123–135
Schulze CH, Waltert M, Kessler PJA, Pitopang R, Shahabuddin, Veddeler D, Muhlenberg M, Gradstein SR, Leuschner C, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2004) Biodiversity indicator groups of tropical land-use systems: comparing plants, birds, and insects. Ecol Appl 14:1321–1333
Sodhi NS, Liow LH, Bazzaz FA (2004) Avian extinctions from tropical and subtropical forests. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:323–345
Southworth J, Nagendra H, Carlson LA, Tucker C (2004) Assessing the impact of Celaque National Park on forest fragmentation in western Honduras. Appl Geogr 24:303–322
Steininger MK (2000) Satellite estimation of tropical secondary forest above-ground biomass: data from Brazil and Bolivia. Int J Remote Sens 21:1139–1157
Steininger MK, Tucker CJ, Ersts P, Killeen TJ, Villegas Z, Hecht SB (2001) Clearance and fragmentation of tropical deciduous forest in the Tierras Bajas, Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Conserv Biol 15:856–866
Stibig HJ, Malingreau JP (2003) Forest cover of insular southeast Asia mapped from recent satellite images of coarse spatial resolution. Ambio 32:469–475
Stibig HJ, Beuchle R, Achard F (2003) Mapping of the tropical forest cover of insular Southeast Asia from SPOT4-Vegetation images. Int J Remote Sens 24:3651–3662
Sutherland WJ, Pullin AS, Dolman PM, Knight TM (2004) The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 19:305–308
Terborgh J, van Schaik C, Davenport L, Rao M (eds) (2002) Making parks work. Strategies for preserving tropical nature. Island Press, Washington
Triantakonstantis DP, Kollias VJ, Kalivas DP (2006) Forest re-growth since 1945 in the Dadia forest nature reserve in northern Greece. New Forests 32:51–69
Turner IM (1996) Species loss in fragments of tropical rain forest: a review of the evidence. J Appl Ecol 33:200–209
Uphoff N, Langholz J (1998) Incentives for avoiding the tragedy of the commons. Environ Conserv 25:251–261
Wells MP, McShane TO (2004) Integrating protected area management with local needs and aspirations. AMBIO: J Hum Environ 33:513–519
Young JE, Sanchez-Azofeifa GA, Hannon SJ, Chapman R (2006) Trends in land cover change and isolation of protected areas at the interface of the southern boreal mixewood and aspen parkland in Alberta, Canada. Forest Ecol Manag 230:151–161
Acknowledgments
We thank Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología for funding and the following for providing access to information: Instituto Nacional de Ecología, Instituto de Geografía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México and the Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e Informática. Also to Toby Gardiner for useful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Dení Rayn presently works as independent consultant.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rayn, D., Sutherland, W.J. Impact of nature reserve establishment on deforestation: a test. Biodivers Conserv 20, 1625–1633 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0051-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0051-y