Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

A systematic review of humanitarian operations, humanitarian logistics and humanitarian supply chain performance literature 2005 to 2016

  • Applications of OR in Disaster Relief Operations
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this manuscript is to explore methodologies for conducting comprehensive literature review. The manuscript objectives are twofold: one is to identify a suitable methodology for conducting comprehensive literature review and two is to enable the identification of main research themes and clusters obtained from the literature. The domain of humanitarian operations, logistics and supply chain performance is selected as the review context. The main strength of a systematic literature review from other styles of literature review is that it provides a much higher level of methodology to the process. It further provides a rapid comprehensive identification of main research themes and clusters as illustrated from the humanitarian operations and logistics performance domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source adapted from Hemingway and Brereton (2009)

Fig. 2

Source The Authors

Fig. 3

Source The Authors

Fig. 4

Source The Authors

Fig. 5

Source The Authors

Fig. 6

Source The Authors

Fig. 7

Source The Authors

Fig. 8

Source The Authors

Fig. 9

Source The Authors

Fig. 10

Source The Authors

Fig. 11

Source The Authors

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altay, N., & Green, W. G. (2006). OR/MS research in disaster operations management. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(1), 475–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 247–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asghar, S., Alahakoon, D., & Churilov, L. (2006). A comprehensive conceptual model for disaster management. Journal of Humanitarian Assistance, 1360(0222), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1, 311–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beamon, B. M., & Balcik, B. (2008). Performance measurement in humanitarian relief chains. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 31(1), 4–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J. (1999). Doing Your Research Project: A guide for first-time researchers in education and social science. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blecken, A., Danne, C., Dangelmaier, W., Rottkemper, B., & Hellingrath, B. (2010). Optimal stock relocation under uncertainty in post-disaster humanitarian operations. In Proceeding of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Science. IEEE Computer Society Press, Honolulu, 5–8 Jan 2010.

  • Clare, J., & Hamilton, H. (2003). Writing Research Transforming Data into Text. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colicchia, C., & Strozzi, F. (2012). Supply chain risk management: A new methodology for a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management, 17(4), 403–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cozzolino, A., Rossi, S., & Conforti, A. (2012). Agile and lean principles in the humanitarian supply chain. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 2(1), 16–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2005). Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In: D. A. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods (pp. 671–689). London: Sage.

  • EPPI-Centre (2015). What is a systematic review? http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=67.

  • Hart, C. (1998). Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemingway, P., & Brereton, N. (2009). What is a systematic review? (2nd ed.). Newmarket: Hayward Medical Communications. p. 8.

  • Huang, Y., Xueping, L., & Omitaomu, A.O. (2011). Conceptual super network model for coordination mechanisms in humanitarian relief chain. In IIE Annual Conference. Proceedings (pp. 1–8).

  • Idris, A., & Soh, S. N. C. (2014). The relative effects of logistics, coordination and human resource on humanitarian aid and disaster relief mission performance. The South East Asian Journal of Management, 8(2), 87–103.

  • Jahre, M., Jensen, L. M., & Listou, T. (2009). Theory development in humanitarian logistics—a framework and three cases. Management Research News, 32(1), 1008–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamison, M. D. (2009). Information flow impediments in disaster relief supply chains. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10, 63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jesson, J., Matheson, L., & Lacey, F. M. (2011). Doing your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabra, G., & Ramesh, A. (2015). Analyzing drivers and barriers of coordination in humanitarian supply chain management under fuzzy environment. Benchmarking, 22(4), 587–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs, G., & Spens, K. (2007). Humanitarian logistics in disaster relief operations. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 37(2), 99–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs, G., & Spens, K. (2011). Trends and developments in humanitarian logistics-a gap analysis. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(1), 32–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manalo, E., & Trafford, J. (2004). Thinking to thesis: A guide to graduate success at all levels. Auckland: Pearson Education New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Vanhamme, J. (2009). Developing supply chains in disaster relief operations through cross-sector socially oriented collaborations: a theoretical model. Supply Chain Management, 14(2), 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matisziwa, T. C., & Murraya, A. T. (2009). Modeling s-t path availability to support disaster vulnerability assessment of network infrastructure. Computers & Operations Research, 36(1), 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petticrew, M., & Helen, R. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, S. J., & Beresford, A. K. C. (2009). Critical success factors in the context of humanitarian aid supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 39(6), 450–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, S. J., & Beresford, A. K. C. (2006). Emergency relief logistics: An evaluation of military, non-military, and composite response models. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 8(4), 313–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Régnier, P., Neri, B., Scuteri, S., & Miniati, S. (2008). From emergency relief to livelihood recovery: Lessons learned from post-tsunami experiences in Indonesia and India. Disaster Prevention and Management, 17(3), 410–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocco, T. S., & Plakhotnik, M. S. (2008). Literature reviews, conceptual frameworks, and theoretical frameworks: Terms, functions, and distinctions. Human Ressource Development Review, 8, 120–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, J. T., Vitoriano, B., Montero, J., & Kecman, V. (2011). A disaster-severity assessment DSS comparative analysis. OR Spectrum, 33(3), 451–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandwell, C. (2011). A qualitative study exploring the challenges of humanitarian organisations. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 1(2), 132–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, S. F. (2010). Horizontal cooperation in disaster relief logistics: Benefits and impediments. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40(8/9), 636–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, A. (2016). Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torracro, R. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4, 356–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ülkü, M. A., Bell, K. M., & Wilson, S. G. (2015). Modeling the impact of donor behavior on humanitarian aid operations. Annals of Operations Research, 230(1), 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Wassenhove, L. N. (2006). Humanitarian aid logistics: Supply chain management in high gear. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(5), 475–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitoriano, B., Ortuño, M. T., Tirado, G., & Montero, J. (2011). A multi-criteria optimization model for humanitarian aid distribution. Journal of Global Optimization, 51(2), 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruth Banomyong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Banomyong, R., Varadejsatitwong, P. & Oloruntoba, R. A systematic review of humanitarian operations, humanitarian logistics and humanitarian supply chain performance literature 2005 to 2016. Ann Oper Res 283, 71–86 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2549-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2549-5

Keywords

Navigation