Abstract
The purpose of this manuscript is to explore methodologies for conducting comprehensive literature review. The manuscript objectives are twofold: one is to identify a suitable methodology for conducting comprehensive literature review and two is to enable the identification of main research themes and clusters obtained from the literature. The domain of humanitarian operations, logistics and supply chain performance is selected as the review context. The main strength of a systematic literature review from other styles of literature review is that it provides a much higher level of methodology to the process. It further provides a rapid comprehensive identification of main research themes and clusters as illustrated from the humanitarian operations and logistics performance domain.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altay, N., & Green, W. G. (2006). OR/MS research in disaster operations management. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(1), 475–93.
Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 247–271.
Asghar, S., Alahakoon, D., & Churilov, L. (2006). A comprehensive conceptual model for disaster management. Journal of Humanitarian Assistance, 1360(0222), 1–15.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1, 311–320.
Beamon, B. M., & Balcik, B. (2008). Performance measurement in humanitarian relief chains. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 31(1), 4–25.
Bell, J. (1999). Doing Your Research Project: A guide for first-time researchers in education and social science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Blecken, A., Danne, C., Dangelmaier, W., Rottkemper, B., & Hellingrath, B. (2010). Optimal stock relocation under uncertainty in post-disaster humanitarian operations. In Proceeding of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Science. IEEE Computer Society Press, Honolulu, 5–8 Jan 2010.
Clare, J., & Hamilton, H. (2003). Writing Research Transforming Data into Text. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
Colicchia, C., & Strozzi, F. (2012). Supply chain risk management: A new methodology for a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management, 17(4), 403–418.
Cozzolino, A., Rossi, S., & Conforti, A. (2012). Agile and lean principles in the humanitarian supply chain. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 2(1), 16–33.
De Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2005). Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In: D. A. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods (pp. 671–689). London: Sage.
EPPI-Centre (2015). What is a systematic review? http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=67.
Hart, C. (1998). Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Hemingway, P., & Brereton, N. (2009). What is a systematic review? (2nd ed.). Newmarket: Hayward Medical Communications. p. 8.
Huang, Y., Xueping, L., & Omitaomu, A.O. (2011). Conceptual super network model for coordination mechanisms in humanitarian relief chain. In IIE Annual Conference. Proceedings (pp. 1–8).
Idris, A., & Soh, S. N. C. (2014). The relative effects of logistics, coordination and human resource on humanitarian aid and disaster relief mission performance. The South East Asian Journal of Management, 8(2), 87–103.
Jahre, M., Jensen, L. M., & Listou, T. (2009). Theory development in humanitarian logistics—a framework and three cases. Management Research News, 32(1), 1008–1023.
Jamison, M. D. (2009). Information flow impediments in disaster relief supply chains. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10, 63.
Jesson, J., Matheson, L., & Lacey, F. M. (2011). Doing your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques. London: Sage.
Kabra, G., & Ramesh, A. (2015). Analyzing drivers and barriers of coordination in humanitarian supply chain management under fuzzy environment. Benchmarking, 22(4), 587–559.
Kovacs, G., & Spens, K. (2007). Humanitarian logistics in disaster relief operations. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 37(2), 99–114.
Kovacs, G., & Spens, K. (2011). Trends and developments in humanitarian logistics-a gap analysis. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(1), 32–45.
Manalo, E., & Trafford, J. (2004). Thinking to thesis: A guide to graduate success at all levels. Auckland: Pearson Education New Zealand.
Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Vanhamme, J. (2009). Developing supply chains in disaster relief operations through cross-sector socially oriented collaborations: a theoretical model. Supply Chain Management, 14(2), 149–164.
Matisziwa, T. C., & Murraya, A. T. (2009). Modeling s-t path availability to support disaster vulnerability assessment of network infrastructure. Computers & Operations Research, 36(1), 16–26.
Petticrew, M., & Helen, R. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Pettit, S. J., & Beresford, A. K. C. (2009). Critical success factors in the context of humanitarian aid supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 39(6), 450–468.
Pettit, S. J., & Beresford, A. K. C. (2006). Emergency relief logistics: An evaluation of military, non-military, and composite response models. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 8(4), 313–331.
Régnier, P., Neri, B., Scuteri, S., & Miniati, S. (2008). From emergency relief to livelihood recovery: Lessons learned from post-tsunami experiences in Indonesia and India. Disaster Prevention and Management, 17(3), 410–429.
Rocco, T. S., & Plakhotnik, M. S. (2008). Literature reviews, conceptual frameworks, and theoretical frameworks: Terms, functions, and distinctions. Human Ressource Development Review, 8, 120–130.
Rodríguez, J. T., Vitoriano, B., Montero, J., & Kecman, V. (2011). A disaster-severity assessment DSS comparative analysis. OR Spectrum, 33(3), 451–479.
Sandwell, C. (2011). A qualitative study exploring the challenges of humanitarian organisations. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 1(2), 132–150.
Schulz, S. F. (2010). Horizontal cooperation in disaster relief logistics: Benefits and impediments. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40(8/9), 636–656.
Sutton, A. (2016). Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
Torracro, R. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4, 356–367.
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207–222.
Ülkü, M. A., Bell, K. M., & Wilson, S. G. (2015). Modeling the impact of donor behavior on humanitarian aid operations. Annals of Operations Research, 230(1), 153–168.
van Wassenhove, L. N. (2006). Humanitarian aid logistics: Supply chain management in high gear. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(5), 475–489.
Vitoriano, B., Ortuño, M. T., Tirado, G., & Montero, J. (2011). A multi-criteria optimization model for humanitarian aid distribution. Journal of Global Optimization, 51(2), 189–208.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Banomyong, R., Varadejsatitwong, P. & Oloruntoba, R. A systematic review of humanitarian operations, humanitarian logistics and humanitarian supply chain performance literature 2005 to 2016. Ann Oper Res 283, 71–86 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2549-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2549-5